ML20044C536

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-482/92-32 on 930201.Corrective Actions:Investigation Showed That All Personnel Are Aware of Crane Travel Restrictions
ML20044C536
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 03/02/1993
From: Hagan R
WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20044C533 List:
References
NA-93-0055, NA-93-55, NUDOCS 9303240108
Download: ML20044C536 (3)


Text

I W@NUCLEAROPERATIN LF CREEK

~

C

~~

_ REGION U i

}

Robert C Hagan March 2, 1993 vee %oent Noctear Assuranc, NA 93-0055 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Station F1-137 Washington, D. C. 20555

Reference:

Letter dated February 1, 1993 from A. B. Beach, NRC to B. D. Withers, WCNOC

Subject:

Docket No. 50-482:

Response to Violation 482/9232-02 i

I Gentlemen:

Attached is Wolf Craek Nuclear Operating Corporation's (WCNOC) response to j

Violation 482/9232-02 which documented in the Reference.

Violation 482/9232-

~

02 involved the failure to have appropriate procedural guidance to ensure the Spent Fuel Transfer Canal Gate would not be positioned over the fuel.

Also documented in the Reference was Violation 482/9232-01 which involved the i

failure to follow scitten instructions during the removal of Spent Fuel Pool Cooling Pump

'A' inboard bearing.

Per discussions with Mr. Greg Pick, NRC Senior Resident inspector, and Mr. Chris Kennedy, Acting NRC Section Chief for Region IV, WCNOC requested an extension to Ebrch 15, 1993, to respond to Violation 482/9232-01.

This extensien was approved by the NRC, as noted in a followup telecon between Mr.

Chris Kennedy and T.

L.

Riley, Supervisor Regulatory Compliance, on march 2, 1993.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (316) 364-8831, extension 4000 or Mr. Kevin J. Moles of my staff at extension 4565.

Ver ruly yours, fn y

Robert C. Hagan if

'bM Vice President I

Nuclear Assurance

,$:;.;ce RCH/jan Attachment cc:

J. L. Milhoan (NRC), w/a G. A. Pick (NRC), w/a W. D. Reckley (NRC), w/a W. D. Johnson (NRC), w/a t

9303240108 930317

-gg

- DR ADOCK 0500 2

P O Box 411/ Burhngton. KS 66839 / Phone. (316) 364-BB31 An Eaual Opportunity Employer M/F /HC/ VET

a i

1 Attachment to WM 93-0029 Page 1 of 2 i

Reply to Notice of Violation Violation 9232-02: Inadeonate Spent Fuel Pool Bridge Crane Operating Procedure r

Failure to have adequate procedural guidance to ensure the fuel transfer canal

.l gate would not be positioned over the fuel.

l Findine:

[

t

" Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires that written procedures shall be established, implemented, and maintained covering the applicable procedures

?

recommended in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33. Revision 2, dated February 1978.

10CFR50, Appendix B,

Criterion V.

' Instructions, Procedures, and j

Drawings', in part, that activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures, or drawings, of a type appropriate to the circumstance.

Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A,

Item 2.k.

recommends procedures for-refueling equipment operation.

This is accomplished, in part, by procedure FHP 03-007. Revision 13, " Spent Fuel Pool Bridge Crane Operating Instructions

[

and Daily Checks".

?

i Step 7.8 procedure FHP 03-007 specifies steps for moving the spent fuel pool j

gate.

The instructions included cautions to ensure that the mechanical stops were installed and to ensure that the spent fuel pool gate was not lifted more than one foot above the fuel assemblies.

j i

Contrary to the

above, the cautions associated with Step 7-. 8 were inappropriate to the circumstances because they did not provide adequate i

guidance to ensure that the fuel transfer canal gate was not positioned over fuel assemblies. On November 5, 1992, while inspecting a spent fuel pool gate j

seal, licensee personnel moved the spent fuel pool gate such that it may have i

been positioned over some fuel assemblies.

l Admission Or Denial Of The Alleged Violation WCNOC denies the alleged violation.

[

Reason For Denial Of The Violation:

f Procedure FHP 03-007 Revision 13, ' Spent Fuel Pool Bridge Crane Operating Instructions And Daily Checks', Section 4.0 ' Notes and Precautions' contained

)

precaution 4.9 stating, 'There shall be. no crane operations directly over stored fuel other than that required for fuel handling.'

Prior to being allowed to operate the spent fuel pool bridge crane all Operations Personnel must first be qualified in accordance with procedure CKL WQ-009. Revision 1, ' Fuel Handling Operator Special Qualification Card'.

This procedure requires the operator to demonstrate a strong working knowledge of the technical specification fuel bridge crane travel restrictions.

w s

r I

?

Attachment to VM 93-0029

)

Page 2 of 2 The assigned operator on the date of the alleged violation was qualified in accordance with this procedure.

Additionally, when questioned after the l

alleged violation the operator provided a detailed explanation of the fuel l

bridge crane travel restrictions contained in the technical specifications.

This demonstrated he was indeed knowledgeable of Technical Specification 3.9.7 f

limitations (that loads in excess of 2250 po ads shall be prohibited from travel over fuel assemblies in the spent fuel pool).

Interviews with personnel involved indicated that Pre-Job Briefings conducted prior to the fuel canal gate seal replacement activity were very detailed.

i The briefing included a discussion of acceptable load paths for the movement l

of the fuel transfer canal gate during the seal replacement activity.

All personnel were aware of the fuel bridge crane travel restrictions contained in j

the technical specifications.

r Upon identification of the alleged event, Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating l

Corporation conducted a thorough' investigation to determine if the personnel were aware of the crane travel restrictions and to determine if the restrictions were violated.

This investigation clearly showed all personnel j

were aware of the restriction and used the necessary precautions to prevent j

the technical specification restrictions from being violated.

The results of the investigation (as documented in Reportability Evaluation Request 92-077) l showed the restrictions were not violated.

j I'

VCNOC does acknowledge the placement of an additional precaution statement, regarding Technical Specification 3.9.7 load limitations, prior to step 7.8 Spent Fuel Pool Gate Operations, of FHP 03-007 is a procedure enhancement l

worth implementing.

This addition was accomplished on 12-1-92.

The addition l'

of this precaution is viewed as another administrative barrier to aid in preventing a violation of the technical specification restriction on crane travel with heavy loads over spent fuel.

(

In summary. (1) a violation of Technical Specification 3.9.7 did not occur, (2) the original procedure FHP 03-007 contained adequate guidance to preclude movement of the crane over stored fuel, (3) based on training, operator l

knowledge and pre-job briefings, the technical specification requirements were well understood, and (4) the procedure was enhanced to provide an additional barrier to preclude such a violation (of Technical Specification 3.9.7 i

specifically).

VCNOC continues to maintain compliance with Technical i

Specification. 6.8.1.a and Regulatory Guide 1.33, Appendix A.

l I

l l

l l

--