ML20044C158

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Response to FOIA Request for Info.Forwards 840320 Memo from Nj Palladino to Commissioners Re Licensing Delays. Document Already Available in PDR
ML20044C158
Person / Time
Site: Shoreham, Limerick  File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date: 01/07/1993
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Stewart L
UNION ASSOCIATES
References
FOIA-92-621 NUDOCS 9303180210
Download: ML20044C158 (1)


Text

.

-4

[

K U1 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION tac wiA HiOtyy Nuvut FOIA -- V2, @p.2, f 3

j-at SPONSE 7 YPE -

f

h

$ ^

RESPONSE TO FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST.

Xi mat l - l PARDAL j

('...../

' =

JAN - 71993 1

n Docm Ei NuuBE HlS)(tf ashcabte/.-

- l ttE OULSTLR.

b PART t,--AGENCY RECORDS RELEASED OR NOT LOCATED ISee checArdboses)

No agency records subject to the request have been located.

. {

No additional agency records subject to the request have been located.

t Requested records are available through another pubhc distribution program, See Comments section, P

Agency tecords subject to the request that are identified in Append;xies) are already available for public inspection and copying at the 3.-

NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC.

~ v Agency records subject to the request that are ide.ntified in Appendix (es) are being made available for public inspection and copying '

at the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC, en a folder under this FOIA number.

i The nonproprietary version of the proposal (s) that you agreed to accept in a telephone conversation with a me nber of my staff is now being made available for public inspection and copying at the N RC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC, ir a folder under this FDI A number, Agency records subject to the request that are identified in Ap;endixles) rnay be inspected and copied at the N RC Local Public Document.

floom identified in the Comments sectionc Enclosed is information on how you may obtain access to and the charges for copying records located at the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street,

. N.W., Washington, DC. FOR 9e o fL 1 N F F R_ M A T / 0 V

- i

. Agency records subject to the request are enclosed. h

, Records subject to the request have been referred to another Federal agencybes) for review and direct response to you_.

~

h/[

fees

]

You will be billed by the NRC for fees totahng S I

. i, You will receive a rcfund frorn the N RC in the amount of S in view of N RC's response to this request, no further action is being taken on appeaf letter dated

. No..

i

,r PART IL A-INFORMATION WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC DISCLOSURE -

Certain information in the f equested records is being withheld f rom public disclosure pursuant to the enemptions described in and for the reasons stated in Part it, B, C, and D. Any released portions of the documents for which only part of the record is being withheld are being made available for public

^ !

Inspection and copying in the NRC Public Document Room,2120 L Street, N.W., Washington, DC in a folder under thrs FOIA numberc

...o COMMENTS

'*3/20/84, Memorandum from Nunzio J.

Palladino to Commissioners re:

Licensing Delays (3 pages)-

'l This confirms your telephone conversation with Connie Pappas-on January 5, 1993, in which you narrowed the scope of your request to the above record.- You are not being assessed fees for the' processing of your FOIA request since the m1nimal fee limit has.

{

not been exceeded.

This completes'NRC's action on your request.

' l, "9303100210 930107 6

PDR FOIA STEWART 92-621 PDR

. j

. i SIGN,:

.y g JP E, DIRE CT OR, vi510N OW

[ DOM OF INF ORMATION ArO PUBLICAllONS $E RVICE S

{

/

\\

. 4

.1.i i

l

_.2._

m v

=

teuCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSiOrd

[g'g,,M usect eu. a. c. nsss

p..y f

e.,

e N _ s. f l'

March 20, 1984 L

came.uu l-1 Mr.MO.U.NDUM FOP.:

Commissioner Gilinsky l-Comnissioner Roberts Coms.issioner Asselstine Co=:issioner Bernthal FROM:

Nunzio J. Palladino SU3 JECT:

EICENSING DEIMS on March 9,1984, the EDO notified us that potential licensing delays, as of the end of rebruary, are 9 months for Shoreha.a and 5 months for Limerick.

On March 16, I had a status and scheduling meeting with the staff, OGC, OPE, and Tony Cotter to discuss these and other possible delays.

It turns out that, beyond Shoreham and Limerick, delays may arise for Waterford and Cor.anche Peak.

These possible delays are in addition to the difficulties being experienced at Diablo Canyon, Byron, Midland. Palo Verde, and Grand Gulf.

Briefing sheets were provided on allegations and on the problems at.a number of plants, and these were distributed to your offices to' assist in understanding the problem and preparing for the Bevill hearing.

I suggest that the Commission hold a special meeting to discuss the problems associated with the foregoing plants.

I believe it is important that we have such a meeting in the near' future so we can focus better on the issues.

We can address this at agenda planning.

Identified below are some thoughts that we might discuss at the meeting.

So that we can take steps to both (a) reduce the d51ays at Shoreham and Limerick that have been officially reported to us by the EDO, and (b) reduce the possibility that delays at other plants nay arise or, if they arise, be extensive, I propose the followingt

.j Tor Shoreham, have the Commission consider a proposal from OGC for an expedited hearing on the diesel problam, or proposals for other possible actions so that at least a low power decision might be possible while i

awaiting tesolution of the amergency planning issue.-

1 have asked the OGC to provide a paper on this subject soon.

In preparing this paper, the OGC.shobid 4

1 work with other offices within HRC at necessary.

w,*

e

~

~

~

For Limerick', have the staff determine whether the licensee will seek a low power authoriration, and have OGC (again working with others as necessary) determine whether there are any other steps that might be taken to expedite the hearing.

For Waterfohd and Comanche Peak, the EDO informed us that he has placed one senior executive in charge of identifying the problems and laying out solutions and schedules for,getting to a licensing decision at each plant.

In addition, I would like the EDO to determine how what we are doing relates to the Board.

I also want to, ensure that we are taking action with the licensee to correct, either by consultation or enforcement, as appropriate, any problems having merit that come to our; attention.

For Diablo Canyon, I suggest that we give careful consideration to the staff's proposal yesterday morning to proceed without going deeply into the other allegations unless a review shows serious problems not already dealt with.

For Byron, we probably need to wait to see what.the Appeal Board says.

Bowever, if a hearing is reopened,

/.

OGC (again working with others as necessary),

should prepare options for Cc= mission consideration to

.~'

expedite it.

We have a revidw by the Con =dssion of the Midland plant now scheduled for April 2, 1984 I suggest that the review include options prepared by the staff for subsequent agency action.

Tor palo Verde land Grand, Gulf, the staff should keep the Commission informed of actions' planned or needed.

In any event, staff review of the diesel generators should be completed on an expedited basis.

l Tor the general problem of last minute allegations that affect a number of plants, 2 recornend that the Connission consider developing a policy for handling last minute allegations.

Such a policy might include a deadline after which the threshold for allowing allegations to hold up a licensing action is very high.

Te-example, that threshold might be something like the followings new inforwation,.

supported by signed affidavits, and presented in a

\\

i I

4 m

mer m

+m

-(.

a.

4..

disciplined way through established channels.

By copy, I would like OGC to explore. this and other possible approaches.

in a paper for-Comission review and decision.

l By copy, I would also.like.the EDD to respond to the specific 1

matters raised above and provide a paper to the-Comission-outlining the steps for dealing with potential delays.

This.

paper would be in preparation' for. a Commission meeting on -

this general subject.at the earliest.possible time.

j

't In keeping with my sbggestion for a Cormnission meeting in the near future,.I propose that papers be prepared within the next co.uple of weeks (at least by April 5) so that the i'

cor=nission could meet-about mid-April.

SECY, please track the above action items.

cc:

SECY OGC-OPE EDO

?*~

3 T

f l

ff I

I