ML20044A253

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Final Response to FOIA Request for Records.App E Record Encl & Available in Pdr.App F Records Withheld in Entirety (Ref FOIA Exemption 5)
ML20044A253
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/24/1990
From: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To: Van Tuyle K
CONOCO, INC. (CONTINENTAL OIL CO.)
Shared Package
ML20044A254 List:
References
FOIA-TUYL90-36 NUDOCS 9006280260
Download: ML20044A253 (4)


Text

--

u s. swcas.A mouwoRa m aioN g.w.i a m.w.

I f/

t m

F OIA 36 h

5

~

c 5. =, r.

1 RESPO E @F 1.! DOM

]1~

1 Inna

'=

INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) REQUEST

...../

MAY 2 41990 D(uCeli vvut h:$s.,.e e.as, hi Ovi 6it a Ms. Karen Van Tuyle PART 1.- AGENCY Rf CoROS RittA$tD OR NOT LOCAf tD t$ce cht(&td boats)

w.. ac, enee...,d,un. is....a n s... b..a in..
w.. m.a.i.

ae,,u...os,u n e is....

n k... i.aix es.e n

  • n.e eu.e.......a.i.i. is,...s.,ms.., owc e.n..i.oie su C-.ai. Sui a.

a

c..n.

..d,. n i. iw... a. u s.i....o r u +e.a acnae in'

....*.......w. ** wiu rin ne.e4 c.c..ne.,,

e roix oxom.a n,o riso t swe. w w. wnw,* oc sosss e

E

.a ae,,u.....a,.n i. i.....i...i....e.au..e.a an.ae ini

... i+ve n....'.w. ie i* rino.*. c onre.,

X

.nc e.,iu ox,.ni mm is to t si..n. ~ w. wnw i.a. oe. e io... se.us. e oia ari..~e... nie.

.m.

e T,

none..n..c..,.... a rn n n.~ec r,.a en eiw...n...iis.i.

.r..i..cc..i..i.i..~.e. coa.....

a..is.ee.ei,.

,...ie..

. i.,,,.e..,

.,,.,....i.,,,i-Sac r w: our.ai ac s i to o si.ni. ~ w. wusee,.a oc... i.e..

.. is.. e ora arw......,, -...

a e.nc,.u e e. 4,.n i. i.,....<nn..i....ero...a an se..ni

_ _,a., i. a o.,.,

c.....ns. sac e u....wc ou r a.

.si

.n is. c-.. i s.n a E nee..e..ne -c e.a

.... -., c.e..a n nne.~e is, csr... i, or re,..... >>u.e e is. sac e.,u.c ou r a a.

. a iro i si...

., a w

wu -r a _oc s

Ae.nc,.n e..ai.ci i. iw....ni c..acS..

  • n.c o... 4,u n. r.... n t... i.a........ i. res.. r.......e.,w.o

.......se..n.nor. i.,

[

v.o. i t i,.i.e,is. sac i ins ie. ire i2116L(actua.Lduplication exceeded estimate by 359 pgs. )

ia... sae.,n w.i.u.

...an.a.i e.,.n a..i..-ei..a.a..nei.n......

. S.

~

PART N. A-INFoRMATiON WITHHELD FROM PustlC Ol5CLOSURt c e a..a.e... a e is.... n i. e. u ee.........~..e..- ~e.,...nn... ~...rn. i~... -n r.

u. +. e a.ee i,,....m......e....

..n.r.e c

.~e o w.e.n.,nus.r

..is. m -.ni iv m ri,tri iis..u e. i.e..i,w c.i...,- u....<.......

.r X

or, ae a " 'vac

  • pc o*-.at a*** 3 ' 20 L S..'

N * *n"'ae'*a oc 'a. 've..ao* "'.i ' o a .at.e ee..a n'e *.+.

COMMtN18 CA copy of the record identified on enclosed Appendix E is enclosed.

The records identified on enclosed Appendix F are being denied in their entirety.

This will complete NRC's action on your request.

9006200260 900524 PDR FOIA VAN TUYL90-36 PDR si Umt. DIRE CTOR. I i$ ION (EDOM Of iN5ORMAfiON AND eV80 CATIONS $tMvict$

M

/

l l

i e.-.

I E

FftEEDOM OF INFORMADON ACT RESPONSE roia NuMet ns.

FOlA 36 DAtt.

PART B B-APPLICABLE EXEMPTIOleS Recorde subfect IJ the toquest that are Ocacrited on the enclosed Appendis(ts) d are being withheld in their entirety or in part under the Enemptions and for the rossons set forth below pursuant M $ U.S C. b52(b) and 10 CFR 9.t 7(a) of NRC Regulations,

t. The withbeid hformetion es p operty classited pursvent to Caecutrve Order itxtMPTION 11
2. The withheld enformation relates solony to the mtsmal personnel rules and procedures of NRC. {EX(MPTION 21
3. The w6thheld enformaten 6: speciteceey esempted frorn pubhc disciosure by statute endicated, itxtMPTION 31 Sections 141 146 of the Atomic treigy Act *Nch proNtats the disclosure of Restricted Data or Formetty Restricted Data 142 U $ C. 21612166L i-Section 147 of the Atomic Energy Act wh.ch proNbsts the disclosure of Unclassefed Safeguards informaten t42 U S C 2167)
4. The withtend mformation is e trede secret or commercial or fmancel informeten that to teing wahheld far the seasonts) mdicated (tX(MPTION 4)

The oitormation 6s consdered to be contdentia! busmans apropretaryl enformaten.

The informaten is consdormt to be propnetary enformation pursuant to lo Cf R 2.790tdH11 i

The information was submitted and receeved in contdence pursuant to 10 CFR I.790idH2)

N

6. The withheld information consists of enteragency or estrangency recoros that are est ova'lable through discovery dunne liteaten 1(R(MPTION 6 Appiceb#e Pnvisepe-Deletierateve Process. Dis who,e raco,ds are wahh. closure of predecesenal mformaten would tend to inNbat the open and frank enchange of edeos e portions because the rolesse of the f acts would permet an mdirect inquiry ento the.oredecessonal process of the agency k

Attorney work product pnyttege (Docurnents prepared by en attomey an contemplation of htigation 1 Attorney-chent pnydege IContdenhal communn atens between an attorney and his her thent i

6. The withheld informaten as esempted from pubhc disclosure because Its disclosure would result m o cioarty unmerranted mves.on of gersonal pnvecy. (EX(MPTION 81
7. The withheld mformaten consists of records compiled for law enforcement purposes and is being withheld for the reason (sl endicated ff X(MPTION 7)

Disclosure could reasonably te espected to mtestere with an enforcement proc 6edmg because et could sesset the scope directen. and focus of on-torcoment ettorts. and thus could possibly allow them to tabe action to sheid potential wrongdomg or a violateon of NRC recupements from e*vestigators (KEMPTION 7 lAli Disclosure would constitute an unwerranted invasion of personal pnvecy itx(MPTION 7tCH The enformation contests of names of edividuals and other mformaten the disclosuit of wNch could reasonably be enDetted to revealidentites of confidential sources qE AEMPTION 7 (Dil OTHLR

~

PART N. C-DENYlNO OFFICIALS Pursuant to 10 CFR 9 26tbl end/or 9 26 (c) of the U $ Nuclear Regulatory Commissen regulatens at has teen determered that the infoemation withheld is esempt from producten or desclosure. and that its producten or disclosure is contrary to the public mte'est The persons responsible for the denial are those officials edentifed below as denyng officials and the Director. Division of Freedom of informaten and Publ*catens Services. Of fice of Administration and Resources Management, for en r deneais that may be appepied to the laecutive Director los Operations ilDol O(NYING OFFICIAL TITLE /OFFfCf RECORDS DENIED APPELLATE OFFICI AL Joseph Scinto Deauty General Counsel for App. F N

1HMHgs anrEnrpteunt PART N. D-APPEAL RIGHTS The deniel by each denying officiat identified 6n Part Il C may be oppealed to the Appellate Offic.ial ndentifed 6n that secuon. Any such appeal must be in wettn's and must be made witNn 30 days of receipt of tNs response. Appeals must be addressed as appropnate to the Executrve Dwector for Operations or to the Secretary of the Commissen.

U S. Nuclear Regulatory Commissen. WesNngton, DC 20$66, and should cieerty stole on the envelope and in the letter that it is en " Appeal from an Irwtial FOIA Decision?

NRC FORM 464 (Port 2)

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISS60N (ti 661 FOlA RESPONSE CONTINUATION

'\\,i

1. ig!j Rea F01A. 90-36 APPENDIX E

RECORDS MAINTAINED IN THE POR UNDER THE ABOVE REQUEST NUMBER NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION _

,:n 1.

-5/21/87 Letter to llarold Denton from Robert Bernstein regarding the Conoco Conquista license transfer to Conquista Project Corporation, (2 pgs.).

1 i

f i

r r

v s

9 a

1

f Ret FOI A. 90-36 APPENDIX F

g RECORDS WITHHELD IN THEIR ENTIRETY FROM DISCLOSURE NUMBER DATE DESCRIPTION 1.

5/24/88 Memo for Malcolm R. Knapp from Stuart A. Treby, subject:

"The Role of Maintenance in Implementing the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, As Amended," (5 pgs.).-

EXEMPTION 5.

2.

9/20/88 Memo for Joel Lubenau from Robert L. Fonner, subject:

" Agreement State Authority in Setting Alternate Concentration Limits," (1 pg.), - EXEMPTION 5.

3.

12/1/88 Memo for Carlton Kammerer from Stuart Treby, subject:

" Texas Draft Changes to Uranium Rules " (2 pgs.), -

EXEMPTION 5.

I 5

l l

I l

\\

i i

r (conoco) j.

Moren von Twyle conoco Inc.

Associate Loget Assistent McLean Building. bom 2100 Legal Department 600 North Dairy Ashford(77079)

Generet Lngation PO. Som 4783 Houston, TX 77210 (713)293-4277 January 19, 1990 Fet 293144o Teles: 776347 Mr. Donnie Grimulay, Direc tor Division of Freedom of Information i

and Publications Servicea EREEDOM OF INFORI.1ATION office of Administration Nuclear Regulatory Cortmj ssion ACT REQUEST

[Q M. Wa Washington, D. C.

20555 N

Oc 'dMS-90 Re Freedom of Information Act Request Deer Sir:

Under the provleions of the Freedom of Information Act, S

'U.S.C.

I 552, as amended, I am r equesting access to records pertaining to the Conoco Conquista Project located near Falls City, Texas.

The Conquista Project is a low level radioactive waste disposul eite operated by conoco inc.

We would be specificelly intereated in documents re:ponsive to re luests received by the Nuclear Regulatory Comraission from the general public, members of Congress, otht:r governmental agencies, etc., in regard to the posuible tiansfer of ownership of the Conquista Project i n t he mid-1980s.

ss Texas is an agreement state and wo have already made Treedom of Information requests on this subject to the Texas Depart-ment of Health and the Texas Railroad Com.nission, I believe it would be more efficient for me to review cespor.ai,ve documents and/or a listing of responsive doenraents rather than make a general copying requeet.

Conoco Inc. is inter-ested in the review of all documents, correspondence, reports, internal memoranda, etc.,

retained by the Nuclear Regulatcry Commission pertinent to the Conquista Project site and especially those located in the Region 4 office in Arlington, Texas.

We are aware that there will be a charge for the search and review of these records and request that you proceed with the search and review and advise us only if the charges exceed $50,00.

A written response is requested within 10 working days to this request.

He believe the documents requested should be available to the public and are not subject to any specific i

l

' January 22,1990 Page 2 exemptions.

Should the Nuclear Regulatory Commission decide that any of the materials requested are not subject to disclosure, we request the Commission supply us with the substance of deleted or withheld items and the reasons justifying non-disclosure.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely, Ngun k. ()cs tylL Karen L. Van Tuyle Associate Legal Assistant Conoco Inc.

600 N. Dairy Ashford Houston, Texas 77079

-(713) 293-4277

/pmg l

I l

l l