ML20043H990
| ML20043H990 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1990 |
| From: | Brothers M CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20043H989 | List: |
| References | |
| ST-11.7-51, NUDOCS 9006270169 | |
| Download: ML20043H990 (11) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,.- iiTi '(. E .- ^. .,h,# g 3 d 'm'.nlj. e' '., l. +.q s. 4 s 4 4 a,- y .g 7 1. ywm / g.j %. R j _ s lj 1 'l d g. ,c 4 s ~
- j
,.'j .;.4 y n t, , ~% a.. .g-1 Docket No. 50 213-li ' 80.Sitfti 3i
- 3 o
3 .' y. j.e, . ! t4 1l 4 1 %y.g,l,- I w L $l.5
- -{
n m._ ylg, pl. ._ g. 4. (31
- y. g, f
'J: f,h 'h h ' l p ," 9,7 s 4 1 j?'[AS s j
- m. "
- =
i (, K + a 1 F e: )j'b'i{ Attachment No. 1 a wg- ;m: - Haddam Neck P1 ant -'.i ,y w .i .,i k. t ng" I l Electromagnetic Interference Test Procedure. j
- 2. t '
.-el s ST 11'.7-51 i 3 .- I 1 m' 3 i ,t Mf..(, j a 6 l ', + .[ ' ' b ..4--.
- )
, $ 7, e:.; n' u ) w 4 M W',7 . A. ;. .p t t .i c + a.f a 4 s-7, ;. " 1, - J !'?,; f j.- .. y ' i. if -( r., y . e.t s ,i 1 um: } s.1 'i .:. t %'
- _ y a
)..-' l:,th _ 4 '4 1:. l i !.; i f ' i, t y 1 7 i .,t q; . w.. June 1990 '!!A ! T > .r $, i, W 062701'69 o00621 y e$g$..q, p R < . PDC 7 ~ ADOCK.0500o233 I iyf;??
- p m' y w a n; m?
4 g nec- ,,g l ? o. -d 's t i .i d. '.)e - - Q> 4k5 'P i j 'W* 4 i ) y t). '- 4 ,.,,:,.: w,,. i..,,.m ,y. Q. g,.,y g,Q '- g
i j CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO. PROCEDURE COVER SHEET 4 JUN 121990 ) PROCEDURE, NUMBER TITLE REY. NO. RPS EW EMWNETEST ST 11.7-51 Original ORGNATOR M. Brothers DATE DEPT. 6 June 1990 Engineering TECHNICAL REVIEW dOPERATIONS HEALTH PHYSICS I ENGINEERING I CHEMISTRY REACTOR ENGR. I SECURITY l MAINTENANCE STORES l X l lNST. & CONTROL IAk lQA / / ADMIN. RECORDS [ Gen. Test ] l[ ] L [ ] l[ ] DEPARTMENT HEAD REVIEW C4-Col #LETE/ BIENNIAL REVIEW? h M PC PORC REVIEW REQUIRED? IXIYESI lNO MAJOR REVISION? h YES ENVIRONIENTAL IMPACT? l IYESIXIPC A CHANGE TO INTENT? YES WRITTEN SAFETY EVALUATION ATTACHED?I IYESIXlN/A SAFETY. EVALUATION REQUIRED'b.__l YES! X l PC UNREVIEWED SAFETYOUESTION? I lYESIXlPC APPROVAL 0 %, L / 0 PoittMerditNtrNO DA PROCEDUREEFFECmT DATE REQUIRES UCENSED OPERATORTVIEW"I d"/39 TTfho h/ 2O fd-YES ] NO Q f ACP 1,2-6.5 ATTACHMENT 12.2, 9/88 M*
Sl!W i 2 M ST 11.7 51 [ Rtv. Original ~ i ~* Connecticut Yankee Special Test Pmeedure RPS EMI ENVIRONMENTAL TEST 1.0, PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this test is to demonstrate that the EMI environment of the Reactor Protection System is enveloped by the vendor qualification testing. 2.0 LINNSE OR ADMINISTRATIVE REOUIREhEh"rS 2.1 COTRAP #A08661
3.0 REFERENCES
3.1 NUREG/CR 3270 " Investigation of Electromagnetic Interference (EMI)l.evels in Commercial Nuclear Power Plants" 3.2 IEEE Std 518 1982 "IEEE Guide for the Installation of Electrical Equipment to Minimize Electrical Noise to Controllers from Extemal Sources" 3.3 The A.R.R.L. Antenna Book 1955, published by the American Radio Relay 1.cague 3.4 Grounding and Shielding Technlaues in Instrumentnion 3rd Edition 1986 by Ralph Morrison 3.5 Electromacnetic Comnatibility Handbook 1987 by J.L. Norman Violette, Donald R.J. White and' Michael F.Violette 3.6 ANSI C63.2-1987 " Electromagnetic Noise and Field Strength,10 kHz to 40 Ghz Specifications" 3.7 ANSI C63.4-1988 "American National Standard Methods of Measurement of Radio - Noise Emissions from 1.ow - Voltage Electrical and Electronic Equipment in the Range of 10 kHz to 1 GHz" 3.8 ' ANSI C63.5 1988 "American National Standard for Calibration of Antennas used for Radiated Emission Measurements in Ecctromagnetic Interference (EMI) Control" 3.9 ANSI C63.61988 "American National Standard Guide for the Computation of Errors in Open Area Test Site Measurements" 3.10 ANSI C63.12 1987 "American National Standant for Electromagnetic Compatibility Limits - Recommended Practice" 3.11 "EMI/RFI Shielding:'Iheory and Technique 1988, Mark Farsi, Shipley Company, Inc. 1of9
Juli 121990 ST 11.7 51 Rev. Original 3.12 Foxboro Qualification Test Re port # 88 1033a Interference Testing of (1) 2CCA SPEC 200 Micro Control Cart, (1) 2CDA S1 SPEC 200 Micro Display, (1) 2Al 12V SPEC 200 Converter, (1) 2AO val SPEC 200 Converter and (1) 2ARPS05 SPEC 200 Power Supply. 3.1 4.0 PREREOUISITES 4.1 Prerequisites 4.1.1 Verify that the following conditions have been met 4.1.1 a. The conditions required for each section of testing are specified in the applicable section. 4.1.2 Test Equipment 4.1.2 a BMI Model 4800 PowerScope 4.1.2 b HP Model 54501 A Digital Oscilloscope - 4.1.2 e Genisco Model 5120 CurrentINobe l 4.1.3 Additional Tools and Equipment 4.1.3 b Shop constructed loop Antenna Probe (ref 3.7) 4.2 Test Release i I 4.2.1 Test Supervisor's Review l ( a. Prereauisite Exceptions (Completed by the Test Supervisor) a Prereaufsite No. ExcentiortComments y l 1 l l' l 1 The Test Supervisor may remove specific exceptions by lining through l the restriction and initialing / dating. (Refer to Section 6.5 of ACP 1.211.7) 2 of 9 4
ST I1.7 51 Rev. Original i b. Documentation of Releases (if requimd). Prerequisites and initial conditions have been reverified, and plant conditions suppon restan of testin3 Test Suptrvisor Dat Test Suporvisor Dat i 4.2.2 Resnonsible Department Head's Resdew a. Restrictions on Procedure Performance (Completed by the Responsible Depanment Head) i I The Responsible Department Head may remove specific restrictions by lining through the restriction and initialing / dating. (Refer to Section 6.5 of ACP 1.211.7) b. Release for Perfonnanec l The test procedure is released for performance subject to the restrictions listed in Section 4.2.2.a. Responsible Depanment Head Date Engineering Supervisor Date (PDCR Preoperational Testing Only) -Y Y I 3 of 9
JUN 121990 I ST 11.7 51 i Rev. Original 4.2.3 Ehift Sunervitar Review and Relente t a. Initial Release Shift Supervisor Dat b. Documentation of Re releases (if required) i f Shift Supervisor Dam t Shift Supervisor Dae Shift Supervisor Dat 5.0 PRECAUTIONS 5.1 None
- st :
6.0 PROCEDURE NrrIAL 6.1 Short term shutdown testing 6.1.1 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "AF" amund the "A" 120 VAC feed. 6.1.2 Connect the current probe to the digital osciUoscope. 6.1.3 Observe the oscilloscope for a period of at least 4 minutes, i 6.1.4 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope,iecord a representative waveform and photograph the oscilloscope screen. 6.1.5 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "BF" around the "B" 120 VAC feed. t 6.1.6 Connect the current probe to the digital oscilloscope, 6.1.7 Observe the oscilloscope for a a period of at least 4 minutes. D L 6.1.8 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope, record a representative waveform and photograph the osciUoscope screen. 6.1.9 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "CF" around the "C" 120 VAC feed. 6.1.10 Connect the cunent probe to the digital oscilloscope. 6.1.11 Observe the oscilloscope for a a period of at least 4 minutes. 4 of 9 w*ete e-m
JUN 121990 i/ ST 11.7 51 Rev. Original 6.1.12 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope, record a representative waveforrn and photograph the oscilloscope screen. 6.1.13 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "DF" around the "D" 120 VAC feed, t 6.1.14 Connect the current probe to the digital oscilloscope. ~ 6.1.15 Observe the oscilloscope for a a period of at least 4 minutet 6.1.16 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope, record a representative waveform and photograph the oscilloscope screen. 6.2 Long term shutdown testing 6.2.1 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "AF" around the "A" 120 VAC feed. 6.2.2 Connect the current probe to the PLDM. 6.2.3 leave the connection in place fc r at least 4 days. 6.2.4 Record the results of the PLDM test on electronic media. 6.2.5 Following manufacturer's instrucions, install the current probe in cabinet "BF" around the "B" 120 VAC feed. 6.2.6 Connect the current probe to the PLDM. 6.2.7 leave the connection in place for at least 4 days. 6.2.8 Record the results of the PLDM test on electronic media. 6.2.9 Following manufacturer's instructions, install the current probe in cabinet "CF" around the "C" 120 VAC feed. 6.2.10 Connect the current probe to the PLDM. 6.2.11 leave the conr.mion in place for at least 4 days, i 6.2.12 Record the results of the PLDM ast on electronic media. 6.2.13 Following manufacturer's instruction.t. Install the current probe in cabinet "DF" around the "D" 120 VAC feed. 6.2.14 Connect the curTent probe to the PLDM. 6.2.15 leave the connection in place for at least 4 days. 6.2.16 Record the results of the PLDM test on electronic media. 5 of 9 ~
JH 12 990 1 ST 11.7 51 Rev. Original 6.3 Radiated Magnetic Field EMI measurements (Control Room) 6.3.1 Have the I&C department construct a loop probe per reference 3.3,3.7 and 3.8. j 6.3.2 Connect the probe constructed in step 6.6.1 to the digital oscilloscope. ] 6.3.3 Rotate the probe to achieve the maximum observable reading. 6.3.4 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope, record a representative waveform and photograph the oscilloscope screen. 6.4 Radiated Magnetic Field EMI measurements (Switchgear 'B' Room) 6.4.1 Connect the probe constructed in step 6.6.1 to the digital oscilloscope. 6.4.2 Rotate the probe to achieve the maximum observable reading. 6.4.3 Utilizing the capture function of the oscilloscope, record a representative waveform and photograph the oscilloscope screen. 6.5 Startup testing 6.5.1 During Plant startup (modes 2,3,4 or 5) repeat steps 6.1.1 trough 6.1.16. 6.6 Operating plant short term testing 6.6.1 With the plant in mode 1 repeat steps 6.1.1 through 6.1.16. 6.7 Operating plant long term testing 6.7.1 With the plant in mode 1 repeat steps 6.2.1 through 6.2.16, 7.0 CHECKI ISTS ( 7.1 None 8.0 , ACCFTYTANCE CRM l 8.1 There are no s cific cceptance criteria for this procedure. Acceptance will be L determined b the project / site engineer to ensure that the observed EMI emironment is l-enveloped b the venoor qualification testing. t 6 of 9 1
JH 121990 ST 11.7 51 Rev. Original 9.0 REVIEW AND SIGNOFF 9.1 enmments on Test Pedomana t t i e 9.2 Pedomance Documentatinn Test Performer Signature Initials Date Test Pedormer. Signature Initials Date Test Performet Signature Initials Date Test Performer Signature Initials Date - Test Performer Signature Initials Date t i + 7 of 9
JUN 111990 ST 11.7-51 Rev. Original ~ 1 o 9.3 Performance Renew 'Ihe test has been wrformed in accordance with the test procedure and authorized changes. All data ins been accurately and properly recorded, any deviations from acceptance criteria or other deficiencies are noted in Section 9.4. Tet,t Performer i Signature initials Date Test Performer Signature initials Date Test Performer i Signature Initials Date 7est Performer Signature initials Date r i Tt st Performer i Signature Initials Date 9.4 - Performance Deficiencies Step No. Deficiency Description Disposidon i i l ) i 9.5 Shift Sunervisor Review Shift Supervisor: Signature Date l-l' i l l L 8 of 9 i
..I JUN 121990 j 4 ST 11.7 51 e Rev. Original ~ 9.6 W ueEvninadnn I have evaluated the completed procedure. Any comments are attached. No.of Pages Signature Igk Dgg M 9.7 ProcMm Anntance 9.7.1 Reennntible Denartment HnA This test procedure has been satisfactorily completed. All test deficiencies have been reviewed for impact on plant operation. Responsible Department Head Date Engineering Supervisor Dale (PDCR Preoperational Testing Only) 9.7.2 PORC Accentance Test procedure accepted: Superintendent Date POh - ecting Number 10.0 FOOTNOTES l l 10.1 None t 11.0
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES l' I ,Section/ Sten Change Reason i l 12.0 ATTACHMENTS 12.1 None 90f9 .}}