ML20043F831
| ML20043F831 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 06/06/1990 |
| From: | Kwiatkowski D Federal Emergency Management Agency |
| To: | Congel F Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20043F832 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9006180202 | |
| Download: ML20043F831 (1) | |
Text
-
qw e
a i
k
( Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 o
O J.N 61990
-Mr. Frank J. Congel Director, Division of Radiation Protection and Emergency Preparedness Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Recf.11atory Commission Washirgton, D.C.
.20555
Dear Mr. Congel:
Enclosed is a copy of the report on the October 3, 1988, exercise of the offsite radiological emergency preparedness plans ' site-specific to the Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station.
We Rancho Seco IAlclear Conerating Station is located approximately twenty miles southeast of Sacramento, 1
California, mis was the fifth joint offsite exercise at Rancho Seco. We State of Califomia's limited participation was' not evaluated during this exercise; : however, its play pluvided exercise support to the offsite
{
jurisdictions and served as a training opportunity for the State.
participants.
Sacraraento, Amador, and San Joaquin Counties, all located in the 10-mile plume emergency planning zone, participated in the exercise.
Under an agreement with State and local officials, the Federal Emergency i
Management Agency (FDR) fomally evaluated five objectives during this
-exercise.
Wese five objectives included those objectives remaining to be demonstrated and evaluated in order to complete the initial six year j
exercise cycle -for -Rancho' Seco.
Additional' exercise objectives were demonstrated for.. training purposes, but.were not fomally: evaluated.
We second six year cycle and the provisions of Guidance Memorandum EX-3 will begin with the next offsite exercise at Rarcho Seco.
his exercise report was prepared by FD%'s Region IX staff.
B ere were no i
deficiencies identified; however, there were several areas identified that-i require corrective action.
We report has been forwarded to the State of California and the affected counties ard a schedule for corrective actions
. has been included in the report.
7 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Craig S.
Wingo, chief,
.j Technological Hazards Division, at (202) 646-3026.
Sincerely, f.fA*^
L Dennis H. IW1 tkowski
,4 Assistant Associate Director office of Natural and Technological Hazards Programs l
' Enclosure 1
l
,