ML20043F173
| ML20043F173 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 06/07/1990 |
| From: | Taylor J NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| TASK-PII, TASK-SE SECY-90-205, NUDOCS 9006140221 | |
| Download: ML20043F173 (27) | |
Text
-
?[sueg A
RELEASED TO THE PDR e1 i
4h9%
\\,..../.::....v...'./.......initf F :
~
aie
,,,,, 1,,0 POLICY ISSUE SECv-90-20s M:
The Commissioners (Information)
From:
James M. Taylor Executive Director for Operations
Subject:
RESULTS OF INDUSTRY SURVEY ON LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN INSPECTIONS AND AUDITS
Purpose:
To provide the Commission with the results of a survey conducted to gain information about the time that nuclear power plant managers spend in responding to various inspections and audits.
Background:
In approving a staff recommendation to conduct a survey of 13 selected licensees to evaluate the effect of NRC activities on the safe operation of nuclear power plants, the Commission requested that the survey be augmented by a short, voluntary, questionnaire to all utilities. The Commission desired intormation aboutTe time that key nuclear power plant managers spend in responding to all of the various inspections and audits (including those conducted by the licensee itself) that are imposed upon them. The Comission indicated that the study should distinguish between inspections and audits conducted by INPO, insurers, and the licensee, and should distinguish between the types of audits and inspections that have been or are expected to be conducted in the future.
The study should ascertain a number of different types of information, including the number of inspections and audits conducted from each source, the areas covered, the nature and extent of the inspections, the time required by the licensee's management, and the frequency of the inspections, in addition, the Commission requested that the questionnaire determine the numbar of internal licensee inspections that are conducted to fulfill NRC requirements.
Discussion:
On January 12, 1990, the staff issued Generic letter No. 90-01,
" Request For Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey." Following suggestions by INPO and NUMARC, the request was modified to remove INP0 Assistance Visits and licensee-initiated self assessments from the survey, in addition, Plant Supervisors were added as a sixth level of management to be surveyed. On a voluntary basis, licensees were asked to provide estimates of the time spent by six levels of management in responding to 11 different kinds of inspections and audits.
The questionnaire indicated that licensee managers should report on their direct involvement in preparing for the activity, CONTACT:
NOTE:
TO BE MADE PUBLICLY AVAILABLE J. Partlow. 492-1284 IN 10 WORKING DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS PAPER AV g
$$b)4/+'daR KS Y
The Commissitners )
participating in the inspection or audit, and in performing the necessary follow-up. The questionnaire requested responses
.from Plant Supervisors, Plant Department Heads Plant Managers, Corporate Department Heads, Corporate Vice Presidents, and the Chief Nuclear Officers. The questionnaire requested information about the following types of inspections and audits:
NRC Team Inspections OSHA-Other NRC Resident, Regional DOT and HQ Inspections / Audits State and Local Authorities INPO Evaluations Other(asspecifiedby NRC-Required QA Audits licensee)
Insurers (ANI)
Other Required Self EPA Assessments The staff received responses from 44 of the 54 nuclear utilities.
The results of the survey are presented in the enclosed graphs and figures. For each of the various kinds of inspections and i
audits conducted, the graphs show the reported average percentage of time each year that managers from each of the six levels are involved in that activity. The table following each graph gives the same average data and also includes the range of involvement reported by the 44 respondents.
In addition, each graph contains a short narrative description of the nature, frequency, and extent of each type of inspection or audit.
Graph I and Table 1 show the total average percentage of time i
that the res)ondents from each of the six levels of management i
reported as being involved in the 11 inspection or audit areas.
The levels of involvement in each of the 11 areas are shown in Graphs 2 to 12 and Tables 2 to 12. The following information summarizes the reported data:
.Among the six levels of management, Plant Supervisors and Department Heads are the most heavily involved in inspections and audits, averaging 27 percent of.their working time.
The level of involvement generally decreases with increasing.
seniority. Corporate Vice Presidents reported being involved in inspections and audits during about 13 percent of the time, while Chief Nuclear Officers reported being involved 8 percent of the time.
Supervisors, De>artment Heads, and Managers at the plant sites-are more leavily involved in inspections and audits than are corporate managers.
As might be expected, NRC inspections represent the largest single inspection or audit area requiring management involve-ment.
For example, Plant Managers reported a total involve-ment of nearly 24 percent of the time, with almost one-half s
The Commissioners
- ofthattime(11.4 percent)attributedtoinvolvementwith NRC inspections. Plant Department Heads also re>orted a i
heavy involvement (11.5 percent of the time) witt NRC inspections.
~
After the NRC inspections, evaluations by INPO require the next largest amount of time. Managers at the plant sites are involved with INP0 evaluations between 4 and 5 percent of their time, and Corporate Officers spend about 2 percent of their time in this area.
Quality Assurance (QA) audits are the only other type of i
inspection and audit where managers from any one of the six levels spend more than about 2.5 percent of their time.
Plant Supervisors are involved in QA audits 3.6 percent of their time. The level of involvement decreases with seniority, with Corporate Officers spending about 1.7 L
percent of their time in this area.
4 None of the remaining areas (including State and local governments, insurers, EPA) individually account for more than about 2.5 percent of any management group's time.
For Plant Managers, the combination of NRC, INPO, and QA audits accounts for 18.5 percent of their time while the seven other types of inspections and audits in the survey account for a total of 5.5 percent of their time, f
Overall, the results of this survey show that all levels of licensee management are significantly affected by the need to be involved in various inspections and audits. Managers at the plant sites are more involved than those at the corporate offices.
The staff is currently developing an action plan to address the issues raised in the onsite survey of 13 selected licensees (SECY-90-080andNUREG-1395). The results of this voluntary survey on management time spent on inspections and audits will be used as additional information in formulating the staff plans.
i
/
NW J mes M. T lor xecutive irector for Operations
Enclosures:
DISTRIBUTION:
M:1:l!
gg"--
OIG GPA REGIONAL OFFICES EDO ACRS ACNW ASLBP ASLAP SECY
L LICENSEE MANAGEMENT TIME
SUMMARY
OF INSPECTIONS / AUDITS i
100 90 -
l l
M-70 -
60 -
=
=-
y 40 -
30 - 26.9 27 7 3
23.7 N
K q'
20 -
s YA A
b YA h(
\\E 8.4 10 -h'
\\
//
O I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
SUPYSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC MAf%GEMENT LEVEL NRC INSPECTIONS OTHER INSPECTIONS
.. GRAPH 1 m.
g3 y,+o<-
4 y
yM
c
- i c,,
. ;.~,c r,
a 1
c >.:'
SUMMARY
OF INSPECTIONS / AUDITS rsJ" INSPECTION CATEGORY
. MANAGEMENT _lJtVEL (% involvement)
SUPVSRS
' PIANT MGR CORP VP.
1 PLANT DH.
CORP DH
~ CHIEF NUC
-i NRC TEAM INSPECTIONS 3.3 4.1 3.3 4.0 1.7
-1,7 i
NRC - OTHER 4.7 7.5 8.2.
4.3 4.1 1.0--
. TOTAL NRC INSPECTIC'1,3 8.0 11.5 11.4 8.2 5.8
.2.8 j
., " NRC Required
- QA
- -Audits' 3.6 3.2 2.6 2.3 1.7 1.7
- INPO~
4.2 4.6 4.4 3.1 1.8 2.0
)
SELF-ASSESSMENTS 2.2 2.6 2.0 1.5 0.7 0.5
. STATE /I4 CAL 2.2
- 1. F, 1.2 1.3 1.2 0.5 INSURERS.
1.4 1.0 0.6 1.3 0.6 0.5 EPA-2.5 0.6' O.3 0.8 0.2 0.1 9
' OSHA 2.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2.
DOT 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 0 '. 0 0.0 OTHER.
0.5 1.4 0.8.
0.5 0.7/
0.1 TOTAL OTHER INSPECTIONS 18.9 16.1 12.3 11.1 7.4 5.6-i TOTAL ALL INSPECTIONS 26.9
-27.7 23.7 19.4 13.2 8.4 7
Note:
Totals may'not add' exactly due to rounding of numbers.
k
)
TABLE 1 i
~'
.. fL:'
N7 LICENSEE MANAGEsENT. TIME fftC TEAM INSPECDONS
~
~
20 19 -
^"
An'" average"-NRC Team. inspection occurs 4.6 times ig -
~
per year,- consists of:6.7 people onsite for 9.7 days, and 17 -
covers 1a. variety
'of areas of-plant operations, 16 - -
engineering, maintenance,.-and security.
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
p i
z 11 -
kJ O
10 -
at i
h:
g_
n.
8-7-
I 6-5-
4.1 4,o '
4-3.3 7.
3,3 7
3-//
//
s
/
[
'I'7 l *7 '
I 2-I I
I i
I i
1 1
s s
s SUPVSRS PLANT GH PtANT MGR CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC t'!
I MANAGEMENT LEVEL 1
i l
i
' GRAPH 2
. 7 1..
a
__.._n_,.,
._,.2.,..
,J_
?
.' s
~
5
-j
- {
I
.i LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN NRC TEAM INSPECTIONS ll l
MANAGEMENT LEVEL
% OF TIME i
AVG HIGH LOW
{
i SUPERVISORS 3.3 13.0 1.2 j
PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS.
4.1 17.1 0.4
'^
PLANT MANAGER-3.3
.12.0 0,8
. CORPORATE DEPARTMENT = HEADS 4.0 11.0 0.8 CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENTS 1.7 8.4 0.1 CHI $F NUCLEAR OFFICER 1.7 10.0 0.3 i
.d T
I 4
?
TABLE 2
. - =..
=
x L
UCENSEE MANAGEMENT TIME
=
NRC - RESIDENT /IREGIONAL NSPECTIONS 20 l
19 -
l' 18 -
An '" average" NRC. - Resident / Region huse1 individual inspection occurs 31'.4. tilmes per: year, c utsists of 2.3 17 -
people onsite for 6.4 days, and covers all areas of plant 16 -
Operations.
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
11 -
g 10 -
y-9-
-8.2 8-7.5 7-
/
6-4.7 5-4,3 43 4-
'l V
a-2-
O'
/
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1.
SUPVSRS PLANT DH ~
PLANT MGR CORP DH
~ CORP.W-CHIEF NUC MAPMGEMENT LEVEL r
..GRA_PH 3 T
_g
-i y
e-h+E,,
-*ms
-e.~,
-+-yg-
-a=sy oy-
,.ws-
+m, y.-+
p.m-
-m,
,+.a,-v
,,i:
j 4
y c.-:
i LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN NRC - RESIDENT / REGIONAL INSPECTIONS c
MANAGEMENT LEVEL 4 OF TIME AVG HIGH LOW j-
. SUPERVISORS 4.7 18.7 2.0 PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS 7.5-26.0 1.0
-PLANT MANAGER 8.2 26.3 1.0
.' CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 4.3.
9.3 0.5
' CORPORATE.VICE-PRESIDENTS 4.1 8.8 0.3-CNIEFNUCLEAROFFICER 1.C 23.5 0.1 p.
a E
'k t
I L
u p
ls R
3 i
1 ".
l i
l.
l:
TABLE 3 N'
m
.k
~
,w e
!. e :.-
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT TIME
. NRC - REQUIRED.QA ALDf15 20 19 -
i 18 -
.. An " average" NRC -. Required Oh audit occurs 31.4 times.:per~ year, consists of-3.4 people onsite for 14.2 17 -
days, and' covers -all-safety related issues.
16 -
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
i z
11 -
w o
10 -
9-n.
8-i 7-6-
5-
'[a 3.6 4-3.2 3-//
2.6
/
2.3
/
/ /.
1.7-1.7 2-y
- - A A
,A A
VA 74 l
1 1
I 1.
I I
I.
I I
I I
. -t SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC l
mal %GEMENT LEVEL GRAPH 4
i 1
f.
1 3
e LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN 4
NRC - REQUIRED QA AUDITS 1
MANAGEMENT LEVEL
% OF TIME d-AVG HIGH LOW L
- SUPERVISORS 3.6 6.3 1.6
~ PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS 3.2 12.0
- 0. S' e
, PLANT MANAGER 2.6 6.0 0.0
' CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 2.3 9.0 O.2 N
CORPORATE VICE-PRESIDENTS-1.7 5.0
'O.2
,y
]
s v1 CHIEF NUCLEAR OFFICER 1.7 6.0 0.1 1
+
o l
ul
'l 4
o W>',,
f t:n-y'
- iL p,
1 lj l
l?
,1,
" 5,y!g t
_l
\\
.:r>
\\!
i4
,i.
E'3
?
L: t B<
!.i <
f-
.! (: 's cI.
< ' ':,; L TABLE 4
.j.p[fj,jlr 9:0 3
1.( ' '.h(ll,y',;
fe
\\ \\:! cy.
uT
..<..a j_
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT TIMEL
~
INPO EVALUATIONS 20
-)
.. 19 -
18 -
An " average" INPO evaluation occurs 1[4 times.per year, consists of'14.6 people onsite.,for.9.5' days,_ and 17 -
covers all areas of plant-operations.
1 16 -
15 -
i 14 -
- 'f i
12 -
~
j z
11 -
l (d
O 10 -
g l
[
9-3_
7-4 6-4.6
,5 -
4,2 4,4
~
/
3.1 2-l0 A
A 4
4
/
~ !b
'~
/
a I
I I
1 I
I I
I l
3 SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR CORP.DH-CORP.W CHIEF NUC i
mal %GEMENT LEVEL i
i GRAPil-5
-i a
,f
,N l ^ ;_ a
.?____________.,
^
- --~~. -
- w;-
-....Q...
~.-
- ~. -
.,,g-
[?' :.,,.
{
i lll s
t it
.s in
't' LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN l!'-
INPO EVALUATIONS l
l R
MANAGEMENT LEVEL
% OF TIME
,;j AVG HIGH LOW Ln-SUPERVISORS 4.2 11.4 0.8 s
T PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS' 4.6 25.0 0.4
,.1
...j
= PLANT MANAGER 4.4-31.2
- 0. 4' l
CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 3.1 20.0 0.2-CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENTS 1.8
.10.0 0.2 CHIEF NUCLEAR' OFFICER 2.0 10.0.
O '.1
,?
TABLE 5 l
'1
~
g_ :
. e -_
" e.:
[F ',.,
LICENSEE :MANAGEMENTL TIME
~
SELF-ASSESSMENTS (IMPOSED) 20
~
19 -
18 -
An " average" -'Self-Assessment occurs 3 8 times per
~
year, consists of-3.9 people onsite for 7.3 days, and 17 -
- covers engineering compliance with various QA standards.
16 -
15 -
14 -
3 13 -
12 -
11 -
y 10 -
[
9-8-
7-l 6-5-
4-3 3-2.2
.2.6
/
1.5 i
2- '<
- - A A
7A M
r%
J';
l 1
I I
- l I
I-
- 1 I
I, i
.I t '
SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR
. CORP DH.
CORP W CHIEF NUC mat %GEMENT: LEVEL :
GRAPH 6
~
9 9
f T7"'YY 4
"I
'I f
- '"'"*--+##
'"WN if' w'.
'"= - a*
u-'
E e
mJr--
eusw t
ji
-'ei lb 4-c.;
. ?
A
.t,1'u p,t
, t j
L.
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN SELF - ASSESSMENTS (IMPOSED) 1
- MANAGEMENT LEVEL 4 OF TIME AVG HIGH LOW SUPERVISORS-2.2 3.5 1.5-iPLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS-2.6 4.1
~ 0. 5
('
cLPLANT MANAGER 2.0 3.4 0.5 o
l CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS-1.5.
2.7 0.3 JCORPORATE VICE' PRESIDENTS' O.7 1.1-0.3 2
i
. CHIEF NUCLEAR. OFFICER 0.5
.1.1-
~0.0.
I t
i
'k e
i
'i
<r i
i
+-'II, a
TABLE 6 yr
\\.-
.w n-
. = m-e
.,qc'-
_x
_.y 47
. -',.; 7
.-^?
- *f h,Ih?$
~' f.
^
~- ;l _. :(-:..
--a
_ {-f
~~ _g
~
,. a;
- -- l 4LICENSEEL MAN'AGElUENT TIME f{
STATE / LOCAL INSPECDONS 20 19 -
.18 -
An " average" State /Incal inspection occurs 7.7 times 17 -
Per year,. consists of 1.9 people ~onsite for 3.9 days,. and covers radioactive waste and-discharge compliance.
16 -
~
~ 15 -
14 -
13 '-
12 -
z 11 -
id 0
10 -
ity 9-B'-
7-6-
5-l 4-3-
2.2 2-1.6-1.2-
.13
'1.2
/
,/
,/
/
/
E
?
O i.
_i SUPVSRS PLANT DH-PLANT MGR
' CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC MANAGEMENT LEVEL
{
GRAPH:7'
'l y
a,
.~.
$~-
- - = - - - - - -
. --/ 3
- - = - - - - - -
E
. r s_.
+
to
,y
.s
[ k ':
'J LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN STATE /IDCAL INSPECTIONS 1
.1 MANAGEMENT LEVEL
% OF' TIME
]
AVG HIGH LOW 1
SUPERVISORS 2.2 5.0 l0. 4 -
PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS:
1.6 8.8
~0.0
. PLANT MANAGER.
1.2 6.8 0.1 g
CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 1.3 5.0 0.1
~l
~ CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENTS
~~1.2.
5.2 0.1 j
CHIfF NUCLEAR OFFICER 0.5~
1.5 0.0 x
1 h (
?
A, k$
4 TABLE 7 k
9 g
.--r, s.
wq
' ~ '
.~
n m
L
- LlCENSEEJMANAGElVIENTiTIME a
NSURER INSPECTIONS 20 18.-
- An " average". Insurers'-inspection-occurs 6.4 times.
- per year,- consists of 2.'0. people onsite for 4.0 days, and' g_
covers fire protection, ' operations and~ maintenance 16 -
Practices.-
f l:
15,-
l l
14 -
i i
13~-
12 -
11 -
I o
10 -
(r
~
8-lt 7-i; t
6-5-
t 4-3-
[
2-1.4
~
1.0 -
-1.3 l
~W/
T
/l
.,/
7 /, / \\
,/.
O i.
n SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR'-
CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC mat %GEMENT LEVEL ~
GRAPH 8-l s
,w-
.g
..+-Uma-y
-.,,,,n
/=,-a
.a.m u,
..w,,,
e..
4
~.~
a 7
i
~
i LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN i
INSURER INSPECTIONS i
- i MANAGEMENT LEVEL
% OF TIME AVG' HIGH LOW SUPERVISORS 1.4
~*7.3 0.4
. PLANT DEPARTMENT' HEADS' 1.0-5.2 0.2
' PLANT MANAGER?
0.6 2.5 0.1 CORPORATE DEPARTMENT! HEADS 1.3 4.0 0.2 CORPORATE VICE, PRESIDENTS-0.6 4.0 0.1
' CHIEF NUCLEAR-OFFICER.
0.5 4.0 0.0 t
- . Reported for.two supervisors responsible for Insurer inspections o
- l
' 1 i
TABLE 8 t
5-o.
m'
.,,J
.M
_e LLICENSEE :MANAGEIViENT TIMEi
~ #
r_FA' INSPECTIONS
-20 i
~
q 19 -
'18 -
An " average" EPA inspection' occurs 1.9. times. ~per
- year, consists of 1.5 people onsite for 1.2 days, and 17 -
covers hazardous -waste,
. discharges-and; chemistry 16 -
controls.-
15 -
.14 -
13 -
12 -
z 11 -
w0 10 -
ir
[
9-i 8-7-
6-
- l 5-l 4-l 3-2.5 2-1 -
0.6 0.8 10.3 0.2
' O'1
/
I
I I
I I
f//I '
0 I
I I
I I
I I
SUPVSRS PLANT DH Pl. ANT MGR CORP DH CORP W CHIEF NUC MAf%GEMENT LEVEL
~
'GRAPli 9
=.-:-
N :
~
-w a
s..
j'
,_ ( _.
~.
1 6
t LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMEN'a U EPA INSPECTIOHE MANAGEMENT LEVEL 4 OF TIME-AVG HIGH LOW
' SUPERVISORS 2.5
- 10.4 0.3
, PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS 0.6 2.4' O.1
-PLANT MANAGERL 0.3 1.2 0.1
- i-CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 0.8 1.5~
0.0 o s.-
, CORPORATE.VICE PRESIDENTS.
0.2 1.2 0.0 CHINF NUCLEAR OFFICER
.0.1 1.1 0.O i
>?
' '*'. Reported for one' supervisor responsible for EPA-inspections' o
\\*
9g e
T j
(
4:,
'.jf c
i --f t
. f s
. 1 TABLE 9 t
i e.
.m
.m m
=
- LICENSEE MANAGEMENT. TIME OSHA INSPECHONS 20 19 -
f 18 - -
-An " average"iOSHA inspection occurs.h.9 times per 17 -
year,. consists : of-1.3 people onsite.for 3.1 days, and
'- l-covers asbestos and personal safety issues.
~
16'-
15 -
1 14 -
13 -
12 -
F-Z 11 -
1 hJ r
O 10 -
b 9-a 8 '-
i 7-t 6-q' 5-4-
t 3-2.0 2- /
1-0.6' O.5 0.5 -
.O.5 0.2 I ' 'I I
II I'/l O
i 1
i e
i i
i
.i SUPVSRS PUNT DH PLANT MGR -
CORP DH CORP VP
' CHIEF NUC
'i MANAGEMENT LEVEL
' GRAPH 10'
'~-
n
~
~D..
l
_ 3 --
..,~.a
, -;3.,, ; c: ' ~ ;
y:,,
...., v.. ;v i.
,,,nn
~
~..
~
._z....,..
t 1
4
- &.y si p.
h
'[','
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN OSHA INSPECTIONS t
- .t.
1 M&HAgywen T LEVEL 4 OF TIME
]
AVG HIGH IDW -
m
, SUPERVISORS 2.0
- 8.6 0.2 i
.t PLANT: DEPARTMENT HEADS--
0.6 3.1 0.2 PLANT MANAGER'-
0.5 1.1 0.1 CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 0.5 1.1
.O.4
. CORPORATE VICE PRESIDENTS 0.5 2.0 0.2 CHTIF NUCLEAR OFFICER 0.2 1.1 0.1 i
i
- Reported for:one supervisor' responsible for OSHA inspections
.q J
4-TABLE 10 l
2 1.f
.1-.. - :.
- 11. ;
=
~
LICEN.SE. EL.MANA. GEMENTJTIME'
~
~'4 7._ -
DEPT OF... TRANSPORTATION 20 19 -
1 8 --
An " average"' Department of Transportation inspection occurs 0.4 times per ' year; consists of '2.1 people onsite 17 -
for 2.1-
- days, and ' covers'. radioactive material 16 -
transportation practices.
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
11 -
td 0
10 -
5 9-(L 8-7-
6 --
I 5-4-
3-2-
- i
'1-0.4 0.6-
'[
'O.O O.0 0.0 0.0 1
O
/, / I I /, / l '
i SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR CORP DH -
CORP W
. CHIEF NUC 1
MAPMGEME' NT LEVEL GRAPil 11
~
~.....
... _. ~,..
I
, e -..
6 LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INSPECTIONS MANAGEMENP LEVEL 4 OF TIME f
AVG HIGH IDW
SUPERVISORS 0.4 0.5
-0.3 PLANT' DEPARTMENT HEADS' 0'. 6 1.2 0.1 PLANT. MANAGER 0.0 0.1 0.0 CORPORATE DEPARTMENT HEADS 0.0 0.0 0.0 CORPORATE'VICE PRESIDENTS-0.0 0.0 0.0 i
.CHINF NUCLEAR' OFFICER 0.0 0.0 0.0 it; 3:
4 TABLE 11
'i b
E A
=
---vv
---r
y v
~~
=.
. a
- '. ; : ~. ; ';
~ ~
-~
4
.gzm; 3.
~
LICENSEE MANAGEldlENT TIME
~-
UTHER NSPEC110NS 20
.19 -
18 -
other inspections / audits occur 7.4 times per.. year, nsist of 1.9 people :. onsite for " 2.7 days,: and cover 17 -
NUMARC initiatives.and a variety of miscellaneous issues.
16 -
15 -
14 -
13 -
12 -
z 11 -
til 0
10 -
9-8-
7-6-
5-4-
3-2-
1.4 0.8 0'.7 0.5 f
1-0.5 Vlli W l' IllI 0
I I
I 3
I I
I
. I 8
5 I
SUPVSRS PLANT DH PLANT MGR CORP DH CORP NP "
'.C H E F N U C mat %GEMENT LEVEL 6
GRAPH 12.
w
+-
m
-s
.,m._-
.o me,.M'
- r,s yw "H-a 2
n.--'-
" ' ^'"'9=-
' = ^ * ~ ~ >
.... E '
-- 1
)
LICENSEE MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT IN j
J-OTHER INSPECTIONS p,
i MANAGEMENT LEVEL
,% OF TIMP g
AVG HIGH LOW.
~ SUPERVISORS 0.5 1.0 0.2 PLANT DEPARTMENT HEADS 1.4 5.0 0.8-
~
s PLANT MANAGER 0.8
- 2.4 0,0 CORPORATE' DEPARTMENT HEADS 0.5 1.0 0.2
= CORPORATE-VICE PRESIDENTS-0.7 1.2 0.1
>i.
1 CHIEF NUCLEAR: OFFICER.
0.1 0.4 0.1 e
i i
TABLE 12 e
e