ML20043E747

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requalification Retake Exam Rept 50-155/OL-90-01 on 900507. Reactor Operator Candidate Passed Exam
ML20043E747
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/1990
From: Bielby M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20043E741 List:
References
50-155-OL-90-01, 50-155-OL-90-1, NUDOCS 9006130347
Download: ML20043E747 (2)


Text

W.9%

4

$p.

W n,,, :. g i

.l r, v:

>+

'g

.REQUALIFICATION PROGRAM EVALUATION REPORT' 1

?

m facility:l Big; Rock Point fluclear Power Plant Examiner:. M. E. Bielby, Sr..

,, S Date of Evaluation: tiay 7,1990 U

  • ?

Areas Evaluated: Written Requ lification Retake Examinatior Examination Results:

y R0.

SRO Total Evaluation Pass / Fail-

. Pass / Fail Pass / Fail (S or U)

+

Written Examination 1/0 0/0 1/0 S

Evaluation of facility written examination grading: The f acility grading was within the tolerance allowed by NUREG-1021, ES-601, Revision 5.

Overall Program Evaluation Sstisfactory:

(ReportNo. 50-155/0L-89-02) 1.

i

>s.

~

n.

w 9006130347 900523 PDR ADOCK 05000155 e..

V PDC Submitted:

Forwa de -

A roved-kch Ys; h

T I T uleiby M. f. fdYdan C. V ight i-

. Examiner Sectioh Chief Branch Chief g>. ;5/pl/_90:

5/ff/90 5At3/90

s REPORT DETAILS s

l.

Examiners uF M. E. Bielby, Sr., Chief Examiner, Region 111 NRC y

2.

Exit Meeting K-!'

An Exit Meeting was conducted May 10, 1990, by phone.

i Facility Representative D. Staten, Instructor, Training Department NRC Regresentative L

M. E. Bielby, Sr., Chief Examiner, Region 111 NRC.

The examination was proctored onsite by Elden Plettner, NRC Senior Resident inspector at Big Rock Point. During administration of the examination it was discovered that question No. 11 on Exam:

R0 A-103 had by two identical distractors.

It was the decision of the Chief Examiner to retain this question as part of the examination because the identical choices were distractors, and the candidate was still required to make a decision between three possible answers, one of which, was correct.

3.

Examination ResuIts Comparison A comparison of the examination results between the facility and the NRC grading was within the tolerance allowed by NUREG-1021, ES-601, Revision 5.

4.

Overall Requalification Program Evaluation The requalification program was previously assigned an overall rating of SATISFACTORY (Report No. 50-155/0L-89-02).

D P

B m

b B-

?

E

_J