ML20043B644
| ML20043B644 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1989 |
| From: | Franz J PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9005310046 | |
| Download: ML20043B644 (187) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:r 5 CCN-90-14104 , ,
, .e **
j f rewa morna-tm nmin or suitt xt PHILADEI.PHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BoTIOM A10MIC PORT.R STATION R D.1. Ilox 208 Delta,Itnnsyhanta 17314 017)456 7014 I i l i May 24, 1990 , Docket Nos. 50 277 1 50 278 , 1 i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ,
?
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
1989 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report No.47 for Peach Bottom Units 2 and 3 for the Period January 1,1989 through December 31,1989. Gentlemen: Enclosed is a copy of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report #47. This report was prepared in compliance with Appendix A to'the Peach Bottom Atomic < Power Station Operating License, Section 6.9.2. l The Radiologica! Environmental Monitoring Program found that PBAPS effects on the j environment were not measurable in any sample media except fish and sediment. A small amount of PBAPS related Mn54,2n 65, Co-60, Cs 134 and Cs 137 octivhy was found in fish and sediment. The calculated dose from fish is 1.03E 01 mrem to a teenager's liver and from - ) sediment is 5.03E 02 mrom to a teenager's skin. These doses are well below the 10CFR50 1 Appendix I design objectivos of 20 mrem, in all sample media, the actual doses are much lower 4 due to conservat.'ve essumptions used. The 1989 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program confirmed that the PBAPS environmental effects from radioactive releases were well below PBAPS Technical Specifications and applicable regulatory limits. ! Sincerely, I J hn F. Franz d Nant Manager
$ flhI u,T$
JFF/DPL/AAF/MJB:dit Enclosures q 1 ohbyy .N PDC ? 1 1DT,, Rad,M.NRc [
y,
. . s- '.
l , cc: R.A. Burricelli, Public Service Electric & Gas T.M. Gerusky, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2) J.J. Lyash, USNRC Senior Resident inspector T.E. Magette, State of Maryland T.T. Martin., Administrator, Region I, USNRC H.C. Schwemm, Atlantic Electric J. Urban, Delmarva Power l R.G. Fletcher, DOE Director of Radiation Control S. Guarniere, Baltimore City Department of Health J.S. Herod, FERC M. Hirshfield, Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources P. Macewen, Cheeter Water Authority D. Janes, EPA Office of Radiation Programs INPO Records Center i l l l l 1DT, Rad,M.NRc b- ----
~-
--- v,wgq_9,: 1 %,pp,_.m , _ , . _ . .
(, vocw no t 2n PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION
- UNITS 2 and 3 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Prepared by PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Radiological Analyses by CLEAN HARBORS ANALYTICAL SERVICES, INC.
325 Wood Road Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 Ano TELEDYNEISOTOPES 50 Van Buren Avenue Westwood, New Jersey 07675
~L_________.__._________.-_-_...
g g 9, t
- q. ,
,, ~
.W .
, ; -; .y , - . . . , - ' . - . .
O e .'= ,
' Y
+ . . % -
,,s
- " ' g '. ~ . g . '
- g . ' f . . *' g . ' { ']
/g.
. : ..- ., , .. ,4 (,
.' u. s..,,
' l ., -
-; p n
. - J i .
l '
? .,
t .
-g . '.
, wp * ' , d' . .
'. '. . ' . . . , p. .
a _-
....'...i...?.
. ,. , . , . . , . . . gp
.g
- q L____......_.......___._.....
W.s
,;.,c
- t. fg ' g' f , r. . '. :. . :,
/4
< ' /. ! - { . k, ; !' _ .
r
+ ,
. .t,.
# . .. .. 1
' g . ,M. h..
- f
' ~
~
m g'. [g.'. ., y'. - 5 .' I- - e -
~ .
; - ,a
, - ' ._ g.. ;
. - '. ; y ,-
- ,'.':. . . -, : 4. g - ,).
*4 p ;
. r.
e . (
.q ,
a
.4 , #i .
#~ . i'.;$.. '[ ,
# - d
.e .: n
'a .', [g b"
- .J e .t. . .
3
.'J=...4 ,t. . ,j,r . * .y.
. t ,,,;. ,
1
* : - .r
- n. n t',
8, '; .t s
. .. , g
. . - 3 .. :
.. ,. ..*:. . 4 - .. ., . , . . : . j s . : .t c p +
. ;4 . .
.. . w.' ,.
r - p
, 7 ~ - Q y : wa y a s,_.:. .
31
$ - .. .n
, 'it .; %;. ^
s . . - g gia t .T.., . ;. $A--n - . n; , '. - l ' g- l - [ . . CD
-, . G ,
)
x -m , ..: - ' _< a
'rp
.,A
\. - -
e " gi 9 . .
. i ;, .' 2 : $ d J :)'j' '.- - [ "
,1 't
' 8 ([ i j .
4g*. - l . a
- ' -' ;:. L 7 g _ . ' _ . '; ,s_'_..,. n ; .,_
y* p -
.- e .'
g * ,.
> . . * .. . . . .- A
.4 .
-c.
, 7 A %: '_ . .\ . j. . . . . .;. 'lp=
_ $-) 4 * - g
Docket No: 50-277 50 278 PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Units 2 and 3 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Report #47 1 January 1989 through 31 December 1989 Prepared By Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Radiological Analyses Performed By Clean Harbors Analytical Services, Inc. 325 Wood Road Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 And Teledyne Isotopes 50 Van Buren Avenus Westwood, New Jersey 07675 May 1990
1 l J TABLE OF CONTENTS EARE I. Summary and Conclusions .......................................... I
- 11. Introduction ..................................................... 3 A. Objectives .................................................. 3 B. Implementation .............................................. 4 l 111. Program Description .............................................. 5 A. S ampl e C ol l ec t i on . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 B. Data Interpretation ......................................... 7 ll C Program Changes ............................................. 7 -
D. Program Exceptions .......................................... 7 IV. Results and Discussion ........................................... 9 _ A. Aquatic Environment ......................................... 9
- 1. Surface Water .......................................... 9 4
- 2. Drinking Water ........................................ 10
- 3. Fish .................................................. 11
- 4. Sediment .............................................. 11 B. Atnospheric Environment .................................... 12
- 1. Airborne .............................................. 12
- a. Air Particulates ................................... 12
- b. Airborne lodine ............................ ....... 13
- 2. Terrestrial ........................................... 13 ,
- a. Milk.............................................. 13
- b. Well Water ......................................... 14
- c. Vegetation ......................................... 15
- d. Soil ............................................... 15 C. Ambient Gamma Radiation .................................... 16 V. References ...................................................... 17 i
m
l t I Appendix A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary I Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations , Appendix C - Data Tables and Figures Primary Laboratory ' Appendix 0 - Appendix E - Data Tables and Figures-Comparison Laboratory Synopsis of Analytical Procedures l-Section 1 - Collection Methods Section 2 - Analytical Methods and Calculations ; Appendix F - Quality Control - EPA Crosscheck Appendix G - PBAPS Survey-l l ' r I, I' I: 3L I-g) Ia
- Il
. I I 3 . 1 *-N 9- 1 e=- -- -*e--.+e.,-
i-qu--- usiini-p-i-im W h N I i 0 . [- [ E [ [
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS L ( p L
J I. Sumary and Conclusions ~ This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) by Philadelphia. conducted Electric Companyat the Peach (PEco) Bottom covers Atomic the period Power 1 January Station 1989 t (PBAPS)hrough 31 Decem 1989. This re t combines the results of the programs conducted by Teledyne Isotopes and Clean Harbors l analyses ere w(TI) poron 2,245(CH) performed samples.1.aboratories. During this period 3,041 Surface water and drinking (potable) water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross alpha, gross beta, gama spectrometry, and tritium. Additionally, drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of 1 Iodine 131. Results of these analyses showed no significant differences be-tween control locations and potentially-affected stations. The values ob-served were within the ranges noted in the preoperational report. The remaining sample media representing the aquatic environment included fish and sediment samples. Fish samples were analyzed for concentrations of l gama emitters and Strontium 89 and Strontium 90. Gross alpha, gross beta, I and gama spectrometry analyses were performed on sediment samples. As in previous years the program detected plant related activity at low levels in a fish and sediment samples in Conowingo Pond. Cs-137 and Cs-134 were found in l fish samples from off site locations. Slightly higher concentrations of these nuclides were found in samples from the plant water discharge system. Sedi-ment samples at indicator locations showed Mn-54, Co-60, Zn 65, Cs-137, and Cs-134. The resulting doses to the maximum exposed individual were less than l 1% of 10CFR50 Appendix I design objectives. All results from-these analyses were comparable to those of previous years. The atmospheric environment was divided into two parts for examination: airborne and terrestrial. Sample media for. determining airborne effects in-i clude air particulates and air iodine samples. Analyses performed on air par-j ticulate samples included gross beta and gamma spectrometry. The results from both analyses were generally consistent with results from the previous years. Furthermore, no notable differences among results from on site, intermediate, l and distant locations in either analysis were observed. These findings indi-I cate no measurable effects from the operation of PBAPS. High sensitivity Iodine-131 analyses were performed on weekly air t samples. All results were less than the minimum detectable level. Examination of tne terrestrial environment was accomplished by analyzing milk, vegetation, soil, and well water samples. Milk samples were analyzed
~
for concentrations of Strontium 89, Strontium-90, Iodine 131, and gamma emit- - ters. Results from all analyses were consistent with those from previous years and no indication of PBAPS effect. Analyses performed on well water samples included gross alpha, gross beta, tritium, and gama spectrometry. Results from these analyses were gen-erally comparable to those of previous years. Results from the indicator and control locations were similar indicating no PBAPS effect. m l B Analyses performed on vegetation-samples included Strontium 89 and Strontium 90 and gamma spectrometry. All results were similar to those seen in previous years. No notable difference was observed between indicator and a control locations. 5 Analyses perfomed on soil samples included gross beta Strontius 89 and l Strontium 90, and es.ama spectrometry. Results from gross beta, strontius analyses, and gamma spectrometry were comparable to those of previous years'. No notable difference was observed between indicator and control locations. Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured monthly and quarterly throughout the year. All monthly and quarterly measurements were below 10 mR/std. month. These results.were consistent with those from previous a years. 5 Except for fish and sediment samples, no measurable amounts of radioac-tivity were found off-site by the REMP which could be attributed to the opera-tion of PBAPS. I I I I I I I I El I g gq i
w I I I I I I I INTRODUCTION I I I I I t
,i
- 11. Introduction Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PbAPS) is located along the Susquehanna River betteeen Holtwood and Conowingo Dans in Peach Bottom Town-ship, York County, Pennsylvania. The initial loading of fuel into Unit 1, a 40 MWe (net) high temperature, gas-cooled reactor, began on F February 1966, 1 and initial criticality was achieved on 3 March 1966. Shutdown of Peach Bot-tom Unit 1 for decommissioning was on 31 October 1974. For the purposes of the monitoring program, the beginning of the operational period for Unit I was
[B considered to be 5 February 1966. A summary of the Uni monitoringprogramwaspresentedinapreviousreportL})lpreoperational . PBAPS Units 2 and 3 are boiling water reactors each with a power output of approximately 1050 m MWe (net). The first fuel was loaded into Peach Bottom Unit 2 on 9 August g 1973, criticality was achieved on 16 September 1973, and full power was reached on 16 June 1974. The first fuel was loaded into Peach Bottom Unit 3 rst reached on 21 December 1974. on5 July 1974,andfullpowerypi(pcforUnits2and3havebeenpreviously Preoperational summary reports i I issued and summarize the results of all analyses performed on samples col-lected from 5 February 1966 through 8 August 1973. The Teledyne Isotopes (TI) program complements an existing program being conducted by Clean Harbors (CH) which has been carried out since 1960. Analysis of the media was conducted by both laboratories as follows: Tl was the primary analytical laboratory for surface and drinking water, silt, air iodine, milk, well water, vegetation, and TLD samp1.s, and the com-parison laboratory for air particulates and fish. l CH was the primary analytical laboratory for air particulates, fish and l soil, and the secondary laboratory for surface and drinking water, milk and vegetation. The total PBAPS REMP exceeds the requirements of the Radiological En-vironmental Technical Specifications both in media sampled and analyses per-formed. A. Objectives
, The objectives of the REMP are:
i
- 1. To identify, measure, and evaluate existing radionuclides in
, the environs of PBAPS site and any fluctuations in radioac-tivity levels which may occur.
- 2. To monitor and evaluate ambient radiation levels, i
- 3. To determine within the scope of the program, any measurable quantity of radioactivity introduced to the environment by the operation of PBAPS.
i
I! ; J
- B. Implementation II !
E ,l Implementation of the stated objectives is accomplished by identi- E i fying significant exposure pathways, establishing baseline :
, radiological data of media within those pathways, and monitoring a; those media during plant operation to assess plant effects (if any) ~ gi on man and the environment. . g i
in order to achieve the stated objectives, the current programs in-clude the fo'ilowing analyses on samples collected. lL ,
- 1. Concentrations of tritium in surface water, drinking, water, S.1
, and well water. 5,
- 2. Concentrations of alpha emitters in surface water, drinking a water, well water, and sediment.
5: 1 i
- 3. Concentrations of beta emitters in surface water, drinking '
j water, well water, air particulates, soil, and sediment. lj
- 4. Concentrations of Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 in milk, !
vegetation, and fish. l
- 5. Concentrations of gamma emitters in surface water, drinking '
! water, well water, air particulates, milk, vegetation, soil, e sediment, and fish, g where the doses wi 1 be greater than maximum annual off site doses) from PBAPS releases;- l A middle ring consisting of twenty five locations (3A, 4K, 5, 6B,.14, ! 15, 17, 22, 23, 26, 27, 31, 32, 33A,.38, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, and 51) extending to approximately ten miles from the site, designed to measure possible exposures to close-in population; i , An outer ring consisting.of seven locations (120, 16, 18, Ig, 20, 218: and 24) extending from approximately 10 to 60 miles from the site, and considered to be unaffected by station releases. l Two on site locations (IA and 11), designated as plant complex locations, are not included in.any of the three rings. I The specific TLD locations were determined by the following-criteria:
- 1. The presence of relatively dense population; l/ !
{
- 2. Site meteorological data taking into account distance and elevation for each of the 36 ten degree sectors around the site, where estimated annual dose from PBAPS, if any, would be ..;
more significant; j
- 3. On hills free from local obstructions and within-sight of the vents (where practical); Bi W
i L 4. Near the dwelling closest to the main stack in the prevailing : down wind direction. t . ' t A TLD set was placed at each location in a locked formica -
'birdhoue" or polyethylene jar located approximately six feet "
above ground level. The TLD sets were excianged monthly and ! quarterly, then sent to the laboratory for analysis. 6-
- . - . _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ . _ _ _
- l '
8 l B. Data Interpretation Several factors are importtat for interpretation of the data pre- ,I sented in this report. These factors are discussed here to avoid i unnecessary repetition in the discussion of the results. ; The minimum detectable level (MDL) was defined as the two sigma l counting statistic, it' represents the range of values into which i 95% of repeated counts of the same aliquot would fall. For all l analyses an activity that was greater than or equal to the MDL was I reported as " activity plus/minus the ML value". When an activity was less than the MOL, the result was reported as the "<MOL value". Data received from the laboratories were re>orted using the conven-i tion of rounding the result to the same num>er of significant . . 'I places as the first significant digit in the error term (e.g., 3.62 ) i 1.24 rounds to 4 i 1). ; Results for each type of. sample were rouped according to the analyses performed. Means and standa d deviations of these results i were calculated. These standard deviations represent.the' l I variability of measured results for different samples rather than single analysis uncertainty. For these calculations, all results below the MDL were considered to be at- the MOL. As a result, the j
]
I means were biased high, and the standard deviations.were generally biased low, i 1 C. Program Changes
- 1. Air particulate location'12A was dropped from'the 1989' REMP. j
- 2. Milk location D resumed operations and was added to the 1989 I I REMP.
- 3. TLD sampling was dropped at' location 12B and started in 12D commencing with the January monthly and quarterly TLDs.
D. Program Exceptions l For 1989 the PBAPS REMP had a sample collection recover rate of j approximately 985. The exceptions to this program are isted below: l I 1. Surface water sampler at location IMM was out of service from 02/24 to 03/17, 06/02 to 06/30, 07/07 to 09/29, and 11/24 to 12/15 due to pump malfunctions. Grab samples were taken.
- 2. Surface water collections for location 138 were not performed for June, September, and October because no water usage was recorded.
- 3. Drinking water sampler at location 4L was out of service from ,
02/17 to 02/25, 03/25 to 04/02, 04/30 to 05/07, 06/04 to 06/11, and 10/27 to 11/05 due to pump malfunction. Grab
.I samples were taken. .i I 7 I
.1 i
- 4. Drinking water sampler at location 61 was out of service from ;
04/08 to 04/15, 05/20 to 06/05, 06/10 to 07/01, 07/22 to ; o 08/05, and 11/25 to 01/07 due to pump malfunctions. Grab ; samples were taken.
- 5. The Sr 89 and Sr 90 anal sis for predator fish samples from locations 41 and 6 for tfe fourth quarter were lost in analy- g! l sis. '
- 6. No predator fish samples were available from locations IEE or IX throughout the year. !
- 7. Air articulate and air iodine samples were not available from the ocation 2 during the week 11/25 to 11/03 due to out of E!
service equipment. ai
- 8. Air particulate samples were not available from the following locations due to out of service equipment: 48 from 12/31 to l 01/07 and 09/30 to 10/07; 32 from 08/05 to 08/121 and 33A from- ,
11/17 to 12/09. -
- 9. The Sr 89 and Sr 90 analysis for soil samples collected from location 2 for 11/11 were lost in analysis. , l
- 10. Quarterly TLD results' were not available from location 11 for t the second quarter due_to vandalism.
Each program exception was reviewed to understand the causes of the l program exception. Sampling and maintenance errors were reviewed ! with the personnel involved to prevent a recurrence. Occasional t equipmeht breakdowns and power outages were unavoidable. The over- '; all sample recovery rate indicates that the appropriate procedures and equipment are in place to assure reliable program implementa- : tion. Il i Il Il 4 Il
... E I;
4
I I I I I I g RESULTS AND DISCUS $10N I I
;l I
g a I
IV. Results and Discussun A. Aquatic Environment
- 1. Surface Idater I Samples were collected from four locations monthly (lLL, IM,13A.
and138). ILL served as the control location. The following analyses were performed. gross Alnha Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of I gross alpha in both soluble and insoluble fractions (Table C-I.1 and C-1.2). Detectable activity was observed in the soluble frac-tion in one of forty-five samples. The data ranged from <.2 to-I 2 pCi/1. Activity was observed in the insoluble fraction, ranging from <.2 to 2.3 pCi/1. In comparing the insoluble data from pre-vious years with that of'1989, no notable differences were ob-served. Comparison of.the control and indicator locations presents no notable difference. - The similarity of results when comparing preoperational and 1989 data, as well as: indicator.to control loca-tions, suggests no increased effects.in receiving water bodies due to the operation of PBAPS. Gross Beta l Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of-gross beta in both soluble and insoluble fractions. (Table C-1.3 and i C-1.4 and Figures C-1 and C-2). The results for the soluble frac-i tion ranged from .6 to 9 pCi/1. The mean for the three indicator locations was 2.8 pCi/1, compared to the mean value of 3.2 pCi/l from the control location. The results from analysis of the in-- j suluble portion of all samples from the surface water locations ranged from <.3 to 7.3 pCi/1. The mean of the indicator locations and control locations were 1.4 pCi/1 and 1.2 pCi/1, respectively. Tritium Samples from three locations (ILL,12,13A were analyzed for con-centrations of aqueous tritium (Table C-I.5 . Results ranged from j
,I 70 to 230 pCi/l and.were within the range found during the i 4
preoperational period. Means from indicator and control-locations compared well, with values of 135 pC1/1 and 140 pCi/1, respective-ly. Ga-a Snectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gam- j na emitters Table C-I.6). .The nuclides searched for were below i the minimum etectable level with the exception of naturally occur-ring K-40. Potassium 40 was'found at all locations and ranged from
<4 to <40 pCi/1. !
..g.
B
- 2. Drinkina (Potable) Wgg,t .
Samples were collected fron'two locations monthly (4L and 61). :a 61 served as the control location. The following analyses were 3 performed. Gross Aloha Samples from.both locations were-analyzed for concentrations of gross alpha activity in soluble and insoluble fractions (Tables - m C-II.1 and C II.2).. Gross alpha activity for the soluble fraction- 5 ranged from <.4 to <1 pC1/1.. Analysis of the insoluble fraction for both locations showed results ranging from <.2 to .9 pC1/1. These values were consistent with those seen in the preoperational period. Gross Beta Samples from both locations were. analyzed for concentrations of-gross beta activity. in soluble and insoluble fractions (Tables. L-II.3 and C-II.4 and Figures C-3 and C-4)., Positive beta activity was detected in most soluble fraction samples from both locations- .l-' ranging from <.6 to 9 pCi/1. The values from the insoluble frac-- tion ratiged from <.4 to 2.4 pCi/1. Only slight differences were. E observed between the means of the control and indicator stations.- 5 The values were generally below those seen in-the preoperational: period. - Indine-131 Samples from both locations wre analyzed monthly for I-131 ' con- E centrations 'B were all less(Table than MOL.C-II.5). One result Results (January) from the indicator showed 1> a positive ac- cation tivity of .22 pCi/1 at the control location. - Tritium g-Samples from both locations were analyzed for tritium concentration E quarterly (Table C-II.6). Results from both indicator and control 9 locations indicate positive tritium activity. with no notable dif-ference between the two locations. The indicator location values ranged from 50 to 240 pCi/1 with a mean:of 140 pCi/1. Control-location values ranged from 50 to 190 pCi/1 with a mean of ga 130 pCi/1, The concentrations were within the range found during the preoperational period. Gamma Snectrometry Samples from both locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitters (Table C-II.7). The nuclides searched for were be-low the minimum detectable level, exce>t for K 40 which was found in three samples at both locations. Tie values ranged from <4 to 30 pC1/1 at location 4L and from <4 to <30 pCi/1 at location 61. g; 3 I Bu 1 u
l l8
- 3. f_ilh Samples were collected from five' locations quarterly (IEE, IX, 41, 4J, and 6). The control location was 6. The following analyses were performed.
Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of I- Sr-89 and Sr-90 (Table C-III.1). All $r 8g values were at or less-than MDL. Positive concentrations of Sr-90 were detected at all I indicator and control locations. .Results ranged from .008 to
.041 pC1/g (wet) at indicator locations and from .004'to .035 pCi/g (wet) at the control location. The indicator and control location results did not show notable differences.
Ga- Snectrometry I Positive activity was observed for the nuclides K-40, Cs-134, Cs 137, Ra-226, and Th-228 ~(Table C-III.2). Values for K 40 ranged from 1.2 10.4.4 pC1/g (wet). Data for Cs-134 ranged from <.007 to
.02 pC1/g (wet)'and values for_Cs-137 ranged from <.007 to .06 I pCi/g (wet). Data for Ra 226 ranged from <.01 to .04'pCi/g (wet).'
Thorium-228 results ranged from <.02 to .08 pCi/g (wet), in addi-tion to these nuclides several others (Be-7, Co-60, Nb 95, Ru-106, I and Ag-110m) were found'at their respective MDL values and may be the result of counting statistics. Figure C-5 illustrates the-Cs 137 activity for indicator and control locations from the begin-ning of the operational period through the present. The maximum 8 dose calculated using the USNRC Regulatory Guide.1.109 Model and. assumptions-is 1.03E 1 prem to a teenager's liver, which is 0.52W of the 10CFR50 Appendix I design objectives. -The actual dose due to PBAPS operations was less, since the maximum concentrations of I- radionuclides were assumed to exist all year. In addition, no credit was taken for ts-137 from sources other than PBAPS.-
- 4. Sediment Samples were collected from six locations semiannually (IBB,1X, I 40, 4J, 4T, and 6F). The control location was 6F. The following analyses were performed.
Gross Aloha I Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross alpha (Table C-IV.1). Results from indicator locations I. ranged from 9 to 29 pCi/g (dry). The mean.value was 11 pCi/g (dry) for the control location, and 18 pCi/g (dry) for the indicator locations. The results were higher for both indicator and control i I locations than those reported in previous years is a result of a change in laboratory and analytical nethod. I l L Il Gross' Beta I: ! t Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table C-IV.1. Results from indicator locations ranged from 23 to 56 pC1/g (dry with a mean of 44 pC1/g (dry). The con-l! > trol location mean was 42 pC1/g (dry). The results were higher for 1 both indicator and control locations that those reported in pre- i vious years as a result of a change in laboratory and analytical : method. - Gamma Spectrometry i Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of gam- - ma emitters (Table C-IV.1). Berylilium 7 was found in two of
- twelve samples with values ranging from <.07 to 2.1 pCi/g (dry). ,
,. Potassium 40 was found in all samples ranging from 9.5 to 20 pCi/g i (dry).. Positive results for Mn-54 were-found at most indicator- - 't p locations with values ranging from <.006 to .03 pCi/g (dry). l Cobalt-60 activity ranged from <.00g pCi/ . (dry).at the control l location to .34 pC1/ (dry) at indicator ocation 4D. Zinc-65 and
- ~ Cs-134 activity was ound in one of twelve samples with values of 'l
.08 pCi/g (dry) and .24 pC1/g (dr , respectively. Positive ac- -
tivity from Cs. 07 was found at a
. locations with a mean value of 6
.35 pCi/g.(dry) for indicator and .21 pCi/g (dry) for control loca- '
tions. Radium 226 and.Th-228 activity was found at all locations. The results were consistent with those from previous years. Figure C 6 illustrates the. comparison of activities of Cs-137 detected at the control'1ocation-and two indicator;1ocations from " I the preoperational period through the present. -If it is assumed - 1 that all Mn-54,: Co 60, 2n-65, Cs-134, and Cs-137 found at off-site indicator _ locations was due to PBAPS releases,la dose calculation using the USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.109 model and assumptions . results in a calculated dose of 5.03 E-02 mrom to a= teenager's '., skin, which is 0.25% of the 10CFR50 Appendix I design objectives. This calculation conservatively assumes that the teenagar was ex posed to the maximum concentrations found-for the entire period. l B. Atmospheric Environment - f
- 1. Airborne
- a. Air Particulates l Samples were collected from fifteen locations (IA, IB, 2, 3A, '
4B, 5, 6B, 120, 14, 15, 17, 31, 32, 33A, and 38). Control locations were 4B, 6B, and 12D. The following analyses were , performed. I! I ,.
I 1 Gross Beta - Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of l gross beta (Tables ir particulate C-V.1 and locations are C V.2 and divided Figures into threeC-7 and C 8). groups: Group I, consisting of 1A,18 and 2, located on site at I 4 PBAPS; Group II, comprised of 3A, 48, 5, 68, 14, 15, 17, 31, ' 32, 33A and 38. located at intemediate distances from PBAPS; r and Group III, consisting of 120, located at remote distance ! from PBAPS. Comparison of results.among.these three groups
,I- aids in determining the effects, if any, resulting from tie operation of PBAPS. The results fron site location sanSles ranged from 11 to 38 E-3 pCi/m*, with a mean of 23 E-3 pCi/m3 . t I The results rom intemediate locations ragged from 11 to 50 E-3 pCi/ , with a mean of 22 E-3 pCi/m3 The results from distantlocatiogsranged.from8to32E-3pC1/m,withamean 3
t l of 16 E-3 pC1/m . Comparison of the mean values indicate no I notable difference among the three groups suggesting no ef- , fects from operation-of.PBAPS. ; Gamma Snactrometry l Samples from all locations were analyzed monthly for the ' I presence of gamma emitters (Tables C V.3 and C-V.4). . Natural-ly occurring Be 7 was found in most samples as has been the case in the past. Other nuclides, including K-40, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ra-226 and Th-228 were found at or slightly above the I detection limit in a few samples. Due to the wide dispersal of the nuclides'and their extremely low level, no PBAPS con-tribution.is indicated.
- b. Airborne lodine Continuous air samples were collected weekly at eight loca- )
tions and analyzed for I-131 (Table C-VI.1). All results were l less than the minimum detectable level. ;
- 2. Terrestrial
- a. Mili ,
I Samples were collected from eleven locations (A, B, C, D, E- l G. J, L, N,.N, and 0). Farms A, B, C, and E were control 1 locations. The following analyses were performed. ' l Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 l Samples from six locations (A, B, G, J, N, and 0) were ana-I- lyzed quarterly for concentrations of Sr-89 and Sr 90 (Table
- C VII.1). All . values of Sr-89 were less than the minimum.
detectable level. All samples indicated positive Sr-90 ac-l tivity with results ranging from .6 to 2.5 pCi/1. Comparing j Sr-90 means from the three groups: nearby farms had a mean 13 - I
I for all samples of 1.7 pCi/1, intermediate farms had a mean of 1.3 pC1/1, and the distant farms had a mean_of 1.4 pCi/1. I Gamma Snectra=atry Samples from six locations were analyzed quarterly for con-' ma - centrations for gamma emitters (Table C-VII.1 and Figure C 9 Naturally occurring K-40 was found in all samples with values). g ranging from 1,200 to 1,500 pCi/1. Positive concentrations of Cs 137 were detected in some samples with positive values E ranging from <1 to 6 pCi/1. All-other nuclides searched for .5 were less than the minimum detectable level. Indine-131 Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of I 131 (Tables C VII.2). All results were less than the mini-mum detectable level. W L
- b. Well Water-Samples from four locations (lu, IV, 40, and 7) were collected-quarterly. Location 7 was the control. The following analyses were performed.. 4 Gross Aloha Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of-gross alpha (Table C-VIII.1). - Results from' analysis of ~
samples from all locations were similar and ranged for <.4 to 2 pC1/1. The results for well water samples were similar to the results of previous years. -l Gross Beta Samples from all _ locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table C-VIII.1). Results ranged from 1.2 to 5 pCi/1. Results were within the range found in the PBAPS preoperational period. Tritium Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of aqueous tritium (Table C-VIII.1). Values ranged from 50 to a 220 pCi/1. There was no notable difference between these results and those from previous years. g G - Snectrometu , Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of .! gamma emitters (Table C-VIII.1). Positive concentrations of- a' K 40 were detected in a few samples.- A11'other nuclides g search for were below the minimum detectable level. I' a
1 l
- c. Vegetation Samples from seven locations -(1, 3A, 4N, 5, 60, 8, and 23)
I- were collected and analyzed. The control locations were 4N, 60, and 8. The following analyses were performed. Strontium-89 and Strontium 90 Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of . I Sr-89 and Sr 90 (Table C-IX.1). Positive activities of Sr 90 ' were detected at all locations ranging from .005 to .52 pCi/g (wet). These results were comparable to those of the previous-year, as well as, >reoperational data. All concentrations of Sr-89 were below t se minimum detectable limit. l Gammalnactromairl Samples from all locations were analyzed for concer,trations of . gama emitters (Table C-!X.2). Positive concentrations of Be-7 and K-40 were detected in most samples with Be-7 activity I ranging from <.03 to 2.0 pCi/g (wet).and K-40 activity ranging from 1.0 to 9.3 pC1/g (wet). Cs 137, Ra-226, and Th-228 were found in several sam >1es and may be due to ' soil contamination. Other nuclides searcied for were below the minimum detection I level. No notable difference between the indicator and con-trol locations was evident.- l d. Egil Samples were collected from six locations (IAA, 2, 3A, 4N, 5, and 6G) semi-annually. Control locations were 4N and 6G. The I following analyses were performed. j Gross Beta Samples from all 1ccations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta (Table C X.1). Positive values were detected in I all samples ranging from .8 to 6.1 pC1/g (dry). Results from indicator and control locations were not notably different. The 1989 results were within the range of PBAPS preoperational data. Strontium-89 and Strontium-90 1 Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of 5 Sr-89 and Sr 90 (Table C X.1). Positive values of Sr-90 were detected in all samples with activities ranging from .022 to I .046 pC1/g (dry). The highest activities were found at loca-tion 2, with a mean of .46 pC1/g (dry). Sr-89 concentrations were all below the detection limit. There was no notable dif-ference between the 1989 Sr 90 results and those of previous g years. I ;
Gamma Snectrometry Samples from all locations were analyzed for concentrations of ; gamma emitters (Table C-X.1). Positive concentrations of K-40, Cs-137, Ra-226, and Th 228 were detected at all loca-tions. Concentrations of Be-7, Cs-134 and Ce-141 at or : slightly above the detection limit were found at several loca-tions. There was no notable difference between the 1989 cesium results and those of previous years.- ; o C. Ambient Gamma Radiation Ambient gamma radiation levels were measured at forty seven loca- i tions (as described in the program descri> tion section using ! CaSOg:Dy thermoluminescent dos meters (Tasles C-XI.1 t rough C-XI.4 .; and Figures C-10 and C II). All monthly and quarterly TLD readings j were below 10 mR/std. month with a range of 2.6 to 9.8 mR/std. . month for the monthly's and.2.8 to 8.4 mR/std. month for the . ! quarterly's. No notable differences were observed among site ' boundary, middle, and outer ring measurements. The data indicated that operation of PBAPS did not affect the existing ambient gamma radiation levels. . I: . E: , i Il . l I; 4 I: g Il L . E' l o
e ,- 1
'l W-A e i m
T-~..T.'
- REFERENCES-
. I M
i; m aimmmunismi -w-- i - isnmii i i -ini ii- i-i
.g : V. References (' Survey Summary Report, March,
- 11. ' Preoperational Environs 1960 through January, 1966.Radioactivitbr (Septem 1967). -
~
i i iE W
- 2. - ~ Interex Corporation, Peach Botton Atomic Power Station Regional En-- :
virons Radiation Monitoring Program Prooperational:Sunnary Report,; 1
-Units 2 and 3, 5. February 1966'through 8 August 1973, June 1977,. l m -Natick, Massachusetts. !
,g 3
- 3. Radiation Management Corporation Publication, Peach Bottom: Atomic j Power Station Preoperational Radiol ical Monitoring Report- for. <
Unit 2 and 3, January;.1974, Philade phia, Pennsylvania.- ' g 1 ll 1 lI 3 l 'I ll I , I i I : I I ;
----. e-v---e.mm.---. - - - - - - -o - --
c .---m.,.w aw.. g.-4 .=.*-- sw a ,a# w u < s s e . 4s4 -.a,a. .s.;-w.....4a u .e-+ , .,,, , , 1 -) u
-)
I
' f
(
.(
I I 1
^
a L
-? .
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING REPORT.
SUMMARY
I j I ,
.t 1 l.. .
?
I 4 I ! I s I ,
. - - . . . . - . . . ._ ._,__.. _ - ., _ , - ._ _ _ . . -. .._. _._.. . -.. ..;. _,_ .. ..- . . -.i . _ _ .. . _ _.._:..__..._.__. .. ..
(. I APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCMET N0.- 50-277'& 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: VORM COUNTV. PA REPORTING PERIOO:1989 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST REOUIRED LOCATIONS ' t.OCA TI ONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER TVPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION
- OF NONROUTINE MEDIUM OR ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME REPORTED PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE & DIRECTION MEASUREMENTS 45 N/A 2 < MDL 2 13A (INDICATOR) ~O SURFACE WATER GROSS ALPHA .
(PCI/ LITER) SOLUBLE (1/33) (1/12) CHESTER WATER INTAKE POND (2) (2) 2.4 MILES ESE OF SITE GROSS ALPHA 45 N/A O.7 0.6 0.9 . 139 (INDICATOR) O INSOLUBLE (16/33) (8/12) (5/9) . CHESTER WATER INTAME PUMP-(0.2-2.3) (0.3-0.8) (0.3-2.3) 2.4 MILES ESE OF SITE GROSS BETA 45 2.5 3.0 3.2 3.4 1 MM . (INDICATOR) O SOLUBLE (31/33) (12/12) (11/12) CANAL DISCHARGE (1.8+9.0) (1.5-7.0) (1.9-9.0) -1.0 MILES SE OF SITE GROSS BETA 45 2.5 1.6 1.2 2.0 139 (INDICATOR) O INSOLUBLE (28/33) (11/12) (8/9) . CHESTER WATER INTAME PUMP ~ (0.4-7.3) (0.6-3.2) (0.4-7.3). 2.4 MILES ESE OF SITE' H-3 AOUEOUS 12 1200 130 .140 140 1MM (INDICATOR) O LIO. SCINT. (8/8) (4/4) (4/4) CANAL DISCHARGE W/ENR (70-230) (80-160)- (70-230) 1 O MILES SE OF SITE GAMMA 45 K-40 N/A 15 11 . _28 139 (INDICATOR) O (5/33) (2/12) (2/9) CHESTER WATER'INTAME PUMP (2-40) (10-12)' '(12-40)- 2.4 MILES'E5E OF SITE MN-54 9 < MDL . < MDL < MDL' O CO-58 9 < MDL- <<MDL < MDL- O FE-59 .18 '< MDL' < MDL < MDL 0
- 9 . < MDL. < MDL . < MDL O-CO-60 O ZN-65 18 < MDL . < MDL' -< MDL' 9 < MDL < MDL~ .< MDL 0" ZR-95 NS-95 9 < MDL- <:MDL < MDL 0 CS-134 9 4.MDL- < MDL < MDL 0' 11 < MDL- < MDL' < MDL- 0 CS-137 O SA-140 35 - < MDL' ' < MDL
. < MDL.
LA-140 9 < MDL < MDL '< MDL 0 MEAN AND RANGE. BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS'ONLV. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).
#" + ' ^ " " ^ * #' ' ' ~- '
- _jk - e- .
+ e-- m~A*+-N'4*--- - + " ~ ' % w?MW""' -
m. APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC' POWER STATION DOCMET NO.: 50-277 &-50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORM COUNTY. PA REPORTING PERIOD: 1999 INOICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST REOUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER: MEO!OM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION a OF NONROUTINE' PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTA9LE (F)' (F) (F) NAME- REPORTED. (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE ME ASURE MENTS _____________________ _....____.. _ _________ - __________ __________ _.___..__..__._._..___'___ .. ____ DISTANCE & DIRECTION DR!NKING WATER GROSS ALPHA 24 N/A < MDL < MDL < MDL 0 (PC1/ LITER) SOLUBLE GROSS ALPHA 24 N/A O.4 0.6 0.6 61~ (CONTROL) . O' INSOLUBLE (4/12) (6/12)- (6/12) .HOLTw00D STATION INTAME (0.2-0.6) (0.3-0.9) ( 0. 3-0.9 ) -- 5.8 MILES NW OF SITE GROSS BETA 24 2.5 3.6 '3.2- 3. 6 - 4L (INDICATOR). O SOLUBLE (11/12). (12/12) (11/12) CONOw!NGO DAM EL 33' MSL (2.2-9.0) - ( 2. 0-6. 0) (2.2-9.0) 8.6 MILES SE OF SITE - GROSS BETA 24 2.5 0.7 1.2 1.2 6I -(CONTROL)- 0 INSOLUBLE (9/12) (10/12) . (10/12)- %LTwOOD STATION INTAME
'(0.5-1.0) (0.4-2.4) (0.4-2.4) 5.8 MILES Nw OF SITE H-3 AQUEOUS 8 1200 140 130 140 .4L (INDICATOR)' . 'O' LIO. SCINT. (4/4) (4/4) . (4/4) CONOw!NGO DAM EL 33' MSL --
W/ENR (50-240) (50-190) , (50-240) 8.6 MILES SE OF SITE-I-131 24 N/A < MDL O.22 .O.22 6I . (CONTROL) 0 (1/12) (1/12) HOLTwOOD STATION INTAME (0.22) (0.22) 5.8' MILES Nw OF SITE' 1 GAMMA 24 K-40 N/A 30 9 30- 4L (INDICATOR) 0 (1/12) .(2/12) (1/12). -CONOWINGO DAM EL. 33*-MSL' (30-30) (8-11) ' ( 30-30)-: '8.6 MILES SE OF SITE MN-54 9 < MDL ' < MDL .< MDL ~ O. CO-58 9; -<-MDL < MDL < MDL 0 FE-59 18 <-MDL < MDLE < MDL 0-CO-60 9 < MDL < MDL 1 < MDL 0 ZN-65 18 .< MDL. < MDL- < MDL O ZR-95 9 < MDL' '< MDL- < MDL 0 NS-95 9 .< MDL- < MDL < MDL'~ -O. CS-134 9 < MDL < MDL < MDLL 0-CS-137 :11 <-MDL < MDL < MDL 0' BA-140 ~35 < MD L ' < MDL < MDL 1 "O LA-140 9 < MDL -- < MDL < MDL- O. WEAN AND RANGE BASED'UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLV. FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN-PARENTHESES (F); i 4
- - - - - - - - --- ,. - -. 2
3
. APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH'80TTOM ATDM!C POWER STATION DOCMET NO.: 50-277 & 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORM COUNTV. km REPORTING PERIOD: 1989. INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST REQUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN MEDIUM OR TYPE OF ' NUMBER OF-MINIMUM NUMSER MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION
- PATHwAV SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTtBLE OF NONROUTINE' (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED (F) .(F) (F) NAME REPORTED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE &' DIRECTION MEASUREMENTS PREDATOR SR-90 10 N/A O.40- 0.38 0.64- (INDICATOR)-
'41- 0 (PCI/ GRAM ASH) (6/7) (3/3) -(2/3) CONOWINGO POND NET TRAP 8 (0.11-0.88) (0.29-0.54) (0.40-0.88) 0.3 MILES N Of SITE-SR-89 10 N/A 0.2 < MDL O.2 4J (INDICATOR) 0 (1/7) (1/4) CONOWINGO. POND NET TRAP 15 (0.2) (0.2) 1.4 MILES SE OF SITE (PCI/ GRAM WET) SR-90 10 N/A O.021: 0.020 0.031 41 (INDICATOR) 'O (6/7) .
(3/3) 1(2/3) .. CONOw1NGO POND NET TRAP 8 (0.008-0.041) (0.012-0.027) (0.021-0.041) 0.3 MILES N OF SITE SR-89 10 N/A 0.02' '< MDLL O 02 4J . (INDICATOR) 0 (1/7) (1/4) CONOw1NGO POND NET TRAP 15 (0.02) .(0.02) '1.4 MILES SE OF SITE GAMMA 12 H-40 N/A . 3. 0 2.9 3.1 41 (INDICATOR) . O~
'(8/8) (3/3). (4/4) . CONow!NGO POND NET TRAP S (1.5-4.4) ..(2.1-3.8) (2.6-4.4) 0.3 MILES N OF SITE i MN-54 .08 < MDL _ < MOL .< MDL CO-58 0
.08 < MDL < MDL '< MDL 'O-FE-59 .16- < MDL < MDL < MDL-
. CO-60 O
. ~18 ~ < MDL < MDL .< MDL' O-ZN-65 16 < MOL 0.03 0.03 6 (CONTROL)
O
.(1/4) .
(1/4) HOLTWOOD-POND i I
- (0.03-0.03) (0.03-0.03) ABOVE DISCHARGE
- RU-106 N/A < MDL O' . i o ' /O.10~ '6',(CONTROL) ~O
'(1/4) _.
-(1/4) ^HOLTWOOD POND .
(0.1-0.1) - ( 0.' 1 -0.1 ) 'ABOVE' DISC.HARGE MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE. MEASUREMENTS ONLY.
' FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).
l i L t {
% g..,s .y . . . . . , .
.%.%-- , w "', <^-f "'w-' '"F"~W"'
*^"4
*'#O#'#' #^ '
A APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOM 7C POWER STATION DOCMET NO.: 50-277 & 50-278' LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORK COUNTY. PA REPORTING PERIOD: 1989-4 If;31 C A TOR CONTROL LOCATION w!TH HIGHEST REQUIRED- LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN ~MEAN MEAN STATION s OF NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME. . REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE- DISTANCE & DIRECTION MEASUREMENTS PREDATOR GAMMA (PCI/ GRAM WET) CS-134 .09 < MDL ( MDL < MDL 0 CS-137 .09 0.025- 0.011- 0.030 ' 4J (INDICATOR) O' (2/8) (1/4) (2/4) . CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 15 (0.020-0.C3) (0.011-0.011) (0.03-0.03) -1.4 MILES SE OF SITE RA.226 N/A 0.04 0.03 0.04 41 (INDICATOR). .0 (1/8) '(1/4) (1/4) CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 8 (0.04-0.04) (0.03-0.03) (0.04-0.04)J -0.3 MILE $ N OF SITE TH-228 N/A 0.05 0.04 0.06 41 (INDICATOR) . 0 (3/8) (2/4) (2/4) CONOWINGO POND' NET TRAP O (0.04-0.08) (0.03-0.05) (0.04-0.08) . -0.3 MILES N OF SITE' 00TTOM FEEDER :SR-90 20 N/A 0.55 0.42 . 0.75 41- (INDICATOR) 0 (PCI/ GRAM ASH) (16/16)' . . (4/4). (4/4) CONOWINGO POND NET. TRAP 8
'(0.23-1.30) (0.07-0.71) (0.25'-1.30). 'O.3 MILES N OF SITE SR-89 20 N/A < MDL1 3 3 . 6 -(CONTROL)' O-(1/4) .: ( 1/ 4 ) 'HOLTwoOD POND
.(3)- (3) 6.0 MILES Nw 0F-51TE (PCI/ GRAM WET) SR-90 20 tN A 0.027 .
-0.016 0.039l. 41' '(INDICATOR) -0 (16/16) .(4/4) (4/4) CONOWINGO POND NET TRAP 8 (0.008-0.075) (0.004-0.035) (0.008-0.075) 0.3 PILES ts OF SITE SR 20L N/A < MDL 0.06 0.06- 6 .ICONTROL) 0 (1/4) (1/4) HOLTwOOD POND (0.06) (0.06) 6.0 MILES Nw OF SITE GAMMA 2D ~
BE-T N/A O.10 . .< MDL .. O .1 . 4J '(INDICATOR) 0 (1/16) (1/4) CONOw1NGO POND NET TRAP 15 '
}(0.1-0.1) (0.1-0.1) 1.4 MILES.SE OF;SITEL MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLV.
FRACTION OF'OETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS !$ INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F)s i 4 4
~ "'
q -
- ~ _ _ _ . _ _ - - _ ,- _ _ _ _ .- _z_ -__ _ . _ _ _ _
M' & '&' &_ ,& .& & '&_&' . .
. '& & _M; & .M; & S &
b APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL' ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC' POWER STATION DOCKET NO. 50-277 C50-278 , LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORK COUNTV. PA REPORTING PERIODe-1989 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION w!TH HIGHEST REQUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER.- MEDIUM OR . TYPE OF NUM8ER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION
- OF NONROUTINE'-
PATHWAV SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME . REPORTED-(UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE . RANGE DISTANCE & DIRECTION MEASUREMENTS? COTTOM F EEIsER GAMMA (PCI/ GRAM WET) K-40 N/A 3.0 2.8 3.5 41 (INDICATOR) 0 (16/16) .(4/4) . (4/4) CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 8 (1.2-4.1) (2.0-3.7) (2.8-4.1) 0.3 MILES N OF SITE MN-54 .08 < MDL- < MDL < MDL- O CO-58 .08 < MDL '< MDL ' < MDL -0 FE-59 .16 < MDL < MDL 4 MOL ' 0' CO-60 .08 0.010 , < MDL 0.01 1EE.~~(INDICATOR) 0-(1/16) -(1/4) DISCHARGE CANAL (0.01-G.01) (0.01-0.01) DISCHARGE CANAL ZN-65 16 < MDL ( MDL: < MDL ' O NB-95 N/A 0.03 < MDL O.03 4 J .. (INDICATOR)- 0
-(1/16) - (1/4) CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 15 (0.03-0.03) :(0.03-0.03) 1.4 MILES SE OF SITE
~
AG-110M N/A 0.02 < MDL ' O.02 4I- (INDICATOR) 0' (1/16) . (1/4) .. CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 8
-(0.02-0.02) (0.02-0.02) - 0.3 MILES N OF SI TE -
CS-134 .09 'O.015 < MDL 0.02 . 1EE (INDICATOR) O.
-(4/16) .
(2/4)' DISCHARGE CANAL (0.01-0.02) (0.02-0.02) DISCHARGE CANAL
'CS-136- 'N/A -O.30 < MDL 'O.30-. 41- (INDICATOR)' O (1/16) (1/4)- CONOw!NGO POND NET TRAP 8'
- ( 0.3-0.3) (0.3-0.3) 0.3 MILES N OF. SITE CS-137 .09 0.026 - 0.010 - .0.04 '1EE "(INDICATOR) 0
-(10/16) '(3/4) .
-(4/4) .
DISCHARGE-CANAL (0.01-0.06) -(0.01-0.01) (0.02-0.06) DISCHARGE CANAL RA-226 N/A 'O.C3 . 0.03 0.03- '1EE (INDICATOR) 'O
'f4/16) .. (1/4)- . (2/4) .
' DISCHARGE CANAL.
- f 0.0 2-0.04 ) - (0.03-0.03)- (0.02-0.04) - ' DISCHARGE CANAL-TH-228 .N/A O.05 < MDL- ' O.05 1x -(INDICATOR)' O (6/16) . .
-(2/4) . .- COOLING TOWER POND B1
- ( 0. 04-0.06) .- - ( 0. 04-0. 06 ) .- 0.3 MILES ESE OF SITE MEAN AND RANGE-BASED UPON DETECTABLE WFkSlJREMENTS'ONLY, FRACTION OF. DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED L0ca,TIONS IS. INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).
,- _ _. _ _ . . . . _ ~ .
, , _ _ , ~ - . ,:.. . - _ . _..m m. m.- - - . - . ~ . . _ -. ._ _ . . - ,-m -
-..m. .
=
APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRx2 ANNUAL SUMM*.RV NAME OF FACILITV: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NO 2'50-277 & 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORK COUNTY. PA' REPORTING PERIOD: 1989 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION WITH HIGHEST REQUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN -MEAN MEAN STATION
- OF NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) 'NAME REPORTED -
(UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERF^RMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE & DIRECTION MEASUREMENTS SILT . GROSS ALPHA 12 N/A .18 11 23 1x (IN01CATOR) O. (PCI/ GRAM DRV) (10/10) (2/2) (2/2) COOLING TOWER POND B1 (9-29) (9-13) .(17-29) 'O.3 MILES ESE OF SITE-GROSS BETA 12 N/A 44 42 55 4T . (INDICATOR) 0 (10/10) (2/2) (2/2) IN POND NEAR CONOw!NGO DAM (23-56) (31-52) (53-56) 8.1 MILES SE OF $1TE GAMMA 12 BE-7 N/A 1.26 2.1 2.1 6F (CONTROL) 0 (1/10) (1/2)' (1/2) MOLTwOOD DAM EAST SHORE (1.3-1.3) (2.1-2.1) (2.1-2.1) 5.0 MILES Nw OF SITE K-40 N/A 16.4 15 20 '4T (INDICATOR)' O (10/10) (2/2) (2/2) IN POND NEAR CONOWINGO. DAM (9.5-20) (12-17) (20-20) 8.1 MILES SE OF SITE MN-54 N/A O.023 < MDL 0.03 4T (INDICATOR) . O (3/10) (1/2) IN POND NEAR COh0wlNGO DAM (0.02-0.03) (0.03-0.03) 8.1 MILES SE OF SITE CO-60 N/A O.13 < MDL' O.34 4D (INDICATOR) 0 (5/10) (1/2) CONOWINGO POND NEAR DISCHARGE (0.04-0.34) (0.34-0234) 1.1 MILES SE OF SITE ZN-65 N/A 0.08 < MDL O.08 '4D - ( I NDI C A TOR ) -- . O (1/10) .(1/2) CONOWINGO POND NEAR DISCHARGE (0.08-0.08) .(0.08-0.08) 1.1. MILES SE OF SITE CS-134 .10 'O.235 < MDL 0.24 4D (INDICATOR) 0 (1/2) CONOWINGO POND NEAR DISCHARGE
-(1/10)'.24)
(0.24-0 (0.24-0.24) 1.1 MILES SE OF SITE CS-137 10 0.43 . 'O.20 0.86 4D (INDICATOR)- 0
-(8/10) (2/2) (2/2) . CONOw!NGO POND NEAR DISCHARGE (D.05-1.7) (0.15-0.26) (0.05-1.7) 1.1 MILES SE OF SITE RA-226 N/A 1.7 -2.2 2.3 47 (INDICATOR) 0 (10/10) (2/2) (2/2) IN POND NEAR.CONOw!NGO DAM (028-2.8). .(2.2-2.3) ( 1. 8- 2.8 ) 8.1 MILES SE OF $1TE TH-228 N/A 1.10 1.3 1. 6 ~ 4T (INDICATOR) 0 (10/10) (2/2) .
(2/2) IN POND NEAR CONOWINGO DAM (0.50-1.6) -(1;3-1.4)' (1.5-1.6) 8.1 MILES SE OF SITE
-MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY.
FRACTION OF DETECTABLE. MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS.IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F). W . g .M W W W E-
~=
- 1. - ;E'
==- = -- - - - -
M E E .E. E 'E E E a
r - APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: Pr,CH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NO.- 50-277 & 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORK COUNTY. PA REPORTING PERIOD:'1989 INDICATOR -CONTROL . LOCATION w!TH HIGHESTs REOuiAEO LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER-MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAM STATION
- PATHWAV SAMPLED OF MONROUTINE ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE.'_ (F)' .MEAN (F) (F) NAME REPORTED (UNIT.0F MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE & DIRECTION
...--...---. ----.... ^ MEASUREMENTS _
DIR PARTICULATE GROSS BETA 773 N/A 22.5 16.4 23.4 . 1A -(INDICA 10R) . (E-3 PCI/CU. METER) s0 (721/721) (52/52) (52/S.) WEATHER STATION NO.1-(11.0-50.0) (8.0-32.0) -(11.0-37.0) 0.3 MILES SE OF SITE GAMMA 180 BE-7 N/A- 130 '140. 150' 5 .(INDICATOR) 0-(129/144) (34/36) (10/12) WAKEFIELD. PA (60-220) (90-200) .(100-200) '4 6. MILES E.0F SITE-
-K-40 N/A 200 210 300 -3A '(INDICATOR) 0 (46/144) (17/36) (4/12) 'OELTA. PA SUBSTATION (100-300) (100-400) (200-300) . 3.6 MILES.Se OF SITE CR-51 N/A 80 < MDL .80 32- (INDICATOR) ~ O (1/144) .(1/12)- SLATE HILL ROAD (80-80) (80-80) 2.7 MILES ENE OF SITE MN-54 N/A 5 < MDL- 5 18 : (INDICATOR) O:
(1/144) (1/12) ' WEATHER STATION NO. 2 (5-5) (5-5) .O.5 MILES Nw OF SITE. CO-57 N/A '3 . 2 3- . 14 (INDICATOR). .O (4/144) (1/36) (1/12)- PETERS- CREEK
-(3-3) (2-2) (3-3) 1.9 MILES ESE OF SITE-CO-60 N/A ~6 < MDL 6 1A- (INDICATOR) .
0 (1/144) -(1/12) WEATHF.R STATION NO. 1 (6-6)~ -(6-6) 0.3 MILES SE OF SITE ZN-65 N/A 15 < MDL. 20 . 31 : (INDICATOR) 0-
.(2/144) -(1/12)~ PILOTTOWN ROAD . _
(10-20) (20-20) 4.9 MILES SE OF SITE ZR-95 N/A 20 . < MDL-- 20 3A (INDICATOR) :0
- (2/144) . ~(1/12) DELTA. PA-SUBSTATION (20-20) (20-20) 3.6 MILES Sw OF SITE NS-95 N/A 10 < MDL 10 2 (INDICATOR) 0 (2/144). '(1/12) . -SITE 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (9-10) .
(10-10) -0.9 MILES SE OF SITE RU-106 .N/A < MDL 60 . - 60 ' . . . 68. (CONTROL) O (1/36) (1/12) HOLTwOOD DAM-
,(60-60). (60-60). S.8 MILES Nw 0F._ SITE.
MEAN AND RANGE SASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. . .
-FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED.. LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN, PARENTHESES (F).
. ,, . . . _ . - - . . _ . , _ m ,. - - - . . .,- , _ c,.~ ,_a._,.,,,.-__-_-,_ f.a ., , . . . .
. _ _ _ . . _ _ . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . _ ._ 'l APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER-STATION DOCmET NO.: '50-277 & 50-278 ~ LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORK COUNTV. PA REPORTING PERIOD: '1989 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION w!TH HIGHEST R EOU18t ED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN -STATION s OF NONROUTINE PATHwAV SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME- REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE . DISTANCE & DIRECTION- MEASUREMENTS AIR PARTICULATE GAMMA (E-3 PCI/CU. METER) SB-125 N/A 20 10 20 3A (INDICATOR) 0 (1/144) (1/36) (1/12) DELTA. PA SUBSTATION (20-20) (10-10) (20-20) 3.6 MILES SW OF SITE I TE-129M N/A 300 200 300 17 (INDICATOR) 'O (3/144) (1/36) (1/12) .
.RIVERVIEW ROAD (200-300) (200-200). '(300-300) 4.0 MILES ESE OF SITE CS-134 .04 < MDL 5 5 12D . (CONTROL) 0 (1/36)- -(1/12) PHILADELPHIA. PA (5-5) (5-5) 62 MILES ENE OF SITE CS-136 N/A < MDL 30 30 68 (CONTROL) O.
(1/36) (1/12) HOLTMOOD DAM HVDRO (30-30) (30-30) -5.8 MILES Nw OF' SITE CS-137 .04 8 < MDL 8 2 (INDICATOR)- 0 (2/144) (1/12) SITE'130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (7-8) (8-8) 0.9 MILES SE OF SITE BA-140 N/A < MDL- 150- 150 120 .(CONTROL) O .. (2/36) (2/12) PHILADELPHIA. PA (100-200) (100-200) 62 MILES ENE OF SITE CE-141 N/A < MDL 10 . 10 12D .(CONTROL)- 9 (1/36) (1/12) PHILADELPHIA. PA
-(10-10) (10-10) 62 MILES'ENE OF SITE RA-226 N/A. 12 < MDL 13. 31 -(INDICATCR) 'O
-(5/144) (3/12) PILOTTOMN ROAD-(8-20) -(8-20) 4.9 MILES SE OF SITE TH-228 N/A. 20 < MDL 20 15 (INDICATOR) 0 (1/144) (1/12) SILVER SPRING ROAD (20-20) (20-20) 3.6 MILE $ N OF' SITE AIR IODINE I-131 415 .04 < MDL. '< MDL-
- MDL .O' (E-3 PCJ/CU. METER) ti! LM I-131- 146 0.6 < MDL < MDL ;< MDL 0 (PCI/ LITER)
.SR-90 24 N/A .1. 6 1.4 .1.8 .O (INDICATOR) O
'(16/16) . (8/8) . -(4/4) .
' NEARBY FARM O (0.6-2.5) (1.2-1 8) (1.4-2.1) 2.2, MILES Sw 0F $1TE'
-MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. ^
FRACTION OF-DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS. INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).
-E 'E @ E . . " ' . 'I il E - E '. '. .E E O E . [
^ ' '
_ m.f.
. ~. : . -.- - - - - -
i
~.
E E N E O O. APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITCRING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCMET NO.: 50-277 & 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: VORK COUNTV. PA . REPORTING PERIOD: 1989 INDICATOR CONTROL- LOCATION w!TH HIGHEST REOUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER ~ MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION A OF MONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) MAME . REPORTED ' (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE.& DIRECTION. MEASUREMENTS GILM SR-89 24 N/A < POL < MDL < MDL ' 0' (PCI/ LITER) GAMCA 24 M-40 N/A 1300 1400 1400 A (CONTROL) 0-(16/16) (8/8) (4/4) DISTANT SITE FARM (1200-1500) (1300-1500)' (1400-1500) 6.0 MILES wSw OF SITE CS-134 10 < MDL < MDL < MDL 0 ES-137 10 5 < MDL 6 J (INDICATOR) 0 (2/16) (1/4) NEAR SITE FARM (4-6) (6-6) 1.1 MILES w OF SITE' BA-140 35 < MDL < MDL < MDL O-LA-140 9 < MDL < MDL < MDL 0 WELL WATER GROSS ALPHA 16 1.5 < MDL 1.5 . 10 (INDICATOR)" O (PCI/ LITER) (2/12) (2/4) UTILITV BUILDING. (0.9-2.0) (0.9-2.0) 0.3 MILES S OF SITE. GROSS BETA 16 2.5 2.9 2.8 4.0 10 (INDICATOR) 0 (12/12) .. (4/4) .(4/4) UTILITY BUILDING (1.2-5.0) (1.5-3.8)' (3.1-5.0) 0.3 MILES S OF SITE H-3 AQUEOUS 16 1200 120 100 130 40- (INDICATOR) O LIO. SCINT. ~(11/12) (4/4) (4/4) PEACH BOTTDM SITE AREA-
.W/ENR (50-220) (50-140)' (60-220) 1.5 MILES Sw OF, SITE GAMMA 16 K-40 N/A 8 8 8 -- 7 (CONTROL)- 0 (1/12) (2/4) (2/4)- DARLINGTON. MD AREA
- ( 8 -8 ) (7-10)- (7 10) 9.6 MILES SSE OF SITE' MN-54 :9 < MDL .' < MDL ' < MDL ' O-CO-58 9 < MDL .'< MDL < MDL- 0 FE-59 18. < MDL -< MDL < MDL .O CO-60 ^9 < MDL < MDL < MDL' O ZN-65 18 < MDL. < MDL. < MDL. O
, ZR-95 9 < MDL < MDL < MDL' .0 NB-95 9 - < MOL - < MDL
'< MDL 0 4 CS-134 .9 < MDL' ' < MDL, < MDL- O CS-137- 11 < MDL '< MDL < MDL. O
-BA-140 35 < MDL' < MDL < MDL- O.
LA-140 9 < MDL < MDL 4 MDL- 0 MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY. FRACTION OF. DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT'SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS INDICATED IN PARENTHESES (F).
- 1_
__.___-__1_ _ _ _i.*-.__. __"' _ *' 1K"W ** ** # # "r I'W9V' t " '
'f i 9' '
**es" "W Y'
' APPENDIX A RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF' FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NO.: 50-277 & 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: VORK COUNTY. PA REPORTING PERICO: 1989 INDICATOR CONTROL LOCATION MITH HIGHEST REQUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER ^ MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN- MEAN MEAN STATION
- OF NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE & DIRECTION. MEASUREMENTS
..__..____.__...__________.._________..____.______.-___________....._-___.....___._.......__.....__..._______.--____...___-- =
VEGETATION SR-90 36 N/A 0.067 0.060 0.102 1 -(INDICATOR) 0-(PCI/ GRAM WET) (19/21) .(12/15) (6/6) PEACH BOTTOM SITE AREA .- (0.005-0.520)-(0.011-0.220) (0.005-0.520) SITE AREA SR-89 36 N/A < MDL- < MDL < MDL 0^ GAMMA 36 BE-7 N/A O.91 'O.42 1.11' 1 (INDICATOR) 0 (14/21) (14/15) (5/6) . SITE AREA (0.00-2.0) (0.2-1.1) (0.8-1.6) SITE AREA K.40 N/A A.0 .4.3- 5.8 (INDICATOR) 0 (21/21) (15/15) (6/6) MAKEFIELD. PA' (1.0-9.3) (2.7-9.2) ~(3.0-9.3)- 4.6 MILES E OF SITE I-131 .36 < MDL 4.MDL '< MDL , D-CS-134 .04 < MDL < MDL < MDL 0 CS-137 .04 0.018 'O.022 0.040. S' '(INDI(~ATOR ) - 'O (4/21)' .
--(7/15) (1/6) WAKEFIELD. PA El (0.006-0.04) -(0.009-0.045) (0.04-0.04) 4.6 MILES E OF SITE-RA-226 N/A O.26 0.24 0.26 -5 (INDICATOR) 0 (1/21) ; ( 5 /.15 ) . . .- ( 1/ 6 ) .
'WAKEFIELD. PA-(0.3-0.33 (0.13-0.4) (0.3-0.3) "4.6 MILES E OF SITE TH-228' ' N/ A"
. 0.052- 'O.090" 0.100 '8 -(CONTROL) O (4/21)- (5/15)- (3/6) . . COLORA. MD
.(0.018-0.100) (0.033-0.18) (0.047-0.18). 9.9 MILES ESE'OF SITE-SOIL GROSS BETA 12 '. N/A '2.7g 2.0. 3.9- 2 (INDICATOR) 0 (PC]/ GRAM DRY) (8/8) .(4/4). (2/2) SITE. 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (0.8-6.1)- (1.2-2.6)- (1.7-6.1) .
0.9 MILES SE OF SITE.
'MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLY.
FRACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS.!S; INDICATED IN,PARENTH8 ESES l(F).
'I M M M .
Ml- M- M - M M- : M M M_M _ . -- - --~z--- . -. - = = -
- -~ -- - . _ _ = -
~ - " m f m F- Q w .t x
.]
APPENDIX A . RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
NAME OF FACILITY: PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION DOCKET NO.: 50-277 i 50-278 LOCATION OF FACILITY: YORM COUNTY. PA REPORTING PERIOD:"1989' INDICATOR CONTROL . LOCATION WITH HIGHEST REOUIRED LOCATIONS LOCATIONS ANNUAL MEAN NUMBER MEDIUM OR TYPE OF NUMBER OF MINIMUM MEAN MEAN MEAN STATION # .0F NONROUTINE PATHWAY SAMPLED. ANALYSES ANALYSES DETECTABLE (F) (F) (F) NAME REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED PERFORMED LEVEL (MDL) RANGE RANGE RANGE DISTANCE. & DIRECTIG:t MEASUREMENTS SOIL SR-90 11 N/A O.135 0.171- 0.46 2 (INDICATOR) 0 (PCI/ GRAM DRY) (7/7) (4/4) (1/1) SITE. 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (0.022-0.460) (0.090-0.310) (0.46) 0.9 MILES SE OF.' SITE SR-89 11 N/A < MDL < MDL < MDL 'O GAMMA 12 . 8E-7 N/A O.4 < PDL O.4 -5 (INDICATOR)- -0 (1/8) (1/2) WAkEFIELD. PA (0.4-0.4) -(0.4-0.4) .4.6 MILES E OF SITE K-40 N/A 25.1 11.3 35 5 (INDICATOR) 0 (8/8) (4/4) (2/2) wAKEFIELD. PA (15.7-36) (3.2-16) (33-36) 4.6 MILES E OF SITE CS-134 N/A O.07 < MDL O.09 2 (INDICATOR) 0 (4/8) (1/2)" SITE 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (0.06-0.09) (0.09-0.09) 0.9 MILES SE OF SITE CS-137 N/A O.60 0.37 0.93 . 3A -(INDICATOR) 0 (8/8) (4/4) (2/2) DELTA. PA SUBSTATION (0.17-1.16) (0.26-0.53) (0.69-1.16) 3.6 MILES SW OF SITE CE-141 N/A O.09 < MDL O.09 1AA (INDICATOR) 0 (1/8) '(1/2) . DISCHARGE CANAL BANK' (0.09-0.09) (0.09-0.09) 0.5 MILES SE OF SITE RA-226 N/A t.20 0.77 ~ 1.5 2 -(INDICATOR) . . O-(8/8) (4/4) (2/2). SITE 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL (0.66-1.7) (0.28-1.1) (1.2-1.7)' O.9 MILES SE OF SITE TH-228 N/A 1.4' 1.00 1.9 2 (INDICATOR) . . O (8/8). (4/4)- (2/23'. SITE 130 DEGREE SECTOR HILL
.(0.9-2.2) (0.31-1.5) (1.6-2.2) 'O.9 MILES SE.0F SITE,.
DIRECT RADIATION TLD-MONTHLY 540 N/A "6.49 6.30- 7.54 :50 (INDICATOR)' ~O ( !LLI-ROENTGEN / .(456/456) (84/84) (12/12)- TRANSCO PUMPING STATION 4 STD. MONTH) (2.60-9.10) (4.10-9.80) (5.80-8.90) 4.9 MILES w'OF SITE TLD-OUARTERLY 180' N/A '6.05 . s 5.86 '7.10' -17 (INDICATOR) 'O (152/152)- (28/28) (4/4). . . RIVERVIEW ROAD (2.80-8.40)- (4.30-7.70)- '(6.50-7.90). 4.0 MILES ESE OF SITE MEAN AND RANGE BASED UPON DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS ONLV. F'RACTION OF DETECTABLE MEASUREMENTS AT SPECIFIED LOCATIONS IS' INDICATED.IN' PARENTHESES (F).
#-~ ~ ' '
^- '- - ' * " " ' * ' ^ ' " " ' " " -'#"
m_wp*_-%. .c-a-r..emdre' .W-*=M- '1 + in..y1
.i.m , g.
s 1 I i h !l
- i I,
2 e :
- 1 I =
6 5 J l
}
\\ ; t i. , - - SAMPLE DESIGNATION :
~
AND LOCATIONS" i F
.i ?
's
^t t
I f 17 . . l 1
- q. y
', , , , . . . ~ , . . . - . . . ~ , . . - ~ - - . , - - - - . - - . . - - . - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . - -- - - . . . - - -
.s e>
- APPENDIX B: SAMPLE DESIGNATION AND LOCATIONS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES' TABLES TABLE B-I:~ Samole Collection and Analysis-Program for the Radiological' Environmental Monitoring Program, Peach Bottom Atomic Power I, Station, 1989 FIGURES ,
~
FIGURE B-1: Environmental Sampling Locations on site;or near_ the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station , a FIGURE B-2: Environmental Sampling Locations _ at Intermediate Distances; d from the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station j FIGURE B-3: Environmental Sampling Locations-at Remote' Distances:from the- i
. Peach Bottom Atomic' Power Station 1 j
i ; I i 1 a 1 i l l l 1 -
TABLE 8-1. Sample Collectton and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental 98onitoring Program, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989.
. ANALYSIS Aped-LOCATICN DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION eBETHOD ENVIRONADENTAL AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERFOResED-CONSULTANT LOCATION DESCRIPTION froes PEACH BOTTOaf A. Surface Water Water is centinuouslysswiupled Gross' Alpha (S&I)-monthly-TI Peach Bottom Continuous sampler On-ILL Units 2 and 3 Site at Units 2 and 3 from the Peacn Bottom Units 2 Gross Beta (S&t)-monthly-TI Intake-Composite I mit ak e 1200EME of and 3 Intake end is collected Gassaie Spec-mon t h l y-T I -
in a 190 gallon tank. Each Aqueous Trittum-quarterly-TI (Control) Units 2 and 3. _ Gross A1pha(S&I)-querter3y-CH8 seek 2 querts are eIthorsen. from the tank prior to drain- Gross Sete(S&I)-quarterly-CH* ing the tank and placed in Gesumia Spec-quarterly-CH* - a 2 gallon polyethylene bottle to form a monthly
' composite sample.
Continuous sampler On- Same as 1LL but' sample Same as locatton ILL Seine - Peach Bottom Canal Discharge- Site at-canal. discharge ..is collected from the' composite 1.0 miles SE of Units discharge canal. 2 and 3. Water'is continuously Gross Alpha (S&I)-monthly-TI f3A Chester Water On east shore of Cono-' Gross 8 eta (S&I)-monthlyi! Intake (raw) eingo Pond at Chester sampled from.the Chester water Authority Intake, GBater Intake. Each seek. Gesessa Spec-monthly-TI 2.4 miles ESE of Units 2 qts. are eithdrawn and Aqueous Tritium-quarterly-TI 2'and 3. placed :1 s a 2 gallon poly-ethylena bottle to form a monthly composite sample. At Chester water. Auth- . Same as'13A but sample -Same'as location 13A 138 Chester Water except no tritium analysis Intake crity int ak e .' .The same' is collected from tho'
- as 13A but the sample pump discharge.'
is collected from the pump discharge.
*QC laboratory mm., .m..u___% _ _, , _ ,,a_ _,____ _,___.___], _
y.;, #
- -- e - a=m-- ---A _
l l-l l TABLE B-1: Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program, (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. ENVIRONISEN T AL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION asETHOD- ANALYSIS AND I AND FREOUENCY FREQUENCY PERFORIBED-CONSULTANT LOCATION DESCRIPTION froes PEACH BOTTOM B. Drinking (Potable) Water Conowingo Dam Continuous sampler ire Water is rontinuously Gross Alpha ($&1)-monthly-TI 41 EL 33' seSL - Conowingo Hydroelec- sampled fr a a header Gross Beta (S&I)-monthly-Tl composite tric Stations about which draws pond water . Gamma Spec-monthly-11 8.6 miles SE of - from elevation 33' 005L. 1-131-monthly-71 units 2'and 3. and.is collected in a Tritium-quarterly-TI 175 gallon tank. Each. . Gross Alpha (S&l)-quarterly-CH* week 2 quarts are with- Gross Beta (SSI) quarterly-CH* drawn f rom the tank prior Gamma Spec-quarterly-CH* i ' to draining the tank and placed in a 2 gallon poly-ethylene bottle to form a month)y Composite sample. [ . I 61 Hottwood Dam Continuous sampler Water is centinuously .Same as locatlon 4L. Hydroelectric at Holtwood Dam, sampled from the Holtwood' Station com- .PA. 5.8 miles Mw Hydroelectric Station,In-posite(control) of Units 2'and 3. take svid is. collected in a 175 gallon tank; Each week 2 quarts are with-drawn from the tank and I .placed in a 2 gallon poly-ethylene bottle to form a.
' monthly composite sample.
t k.
! *OC laboratory n
M M M M M M M M M M; M M ~M M i' M ; & MM q w .
TABLE S-I: Sample Collection and analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. ENVIRONRIENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS AND LOCATION DESCRIPTION FROEB PEACH BOTTOGR AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERFOResED-CONSULTANT C. well water lit Peach Bottom Well at Plant Site Wele pumse is *un f or several leitium quarterly-Y1 Site-Utility 1400- S cf uri t t = mir.utes prior to sampling Gr oss Bet a quarter ly-TI Building 2 and 3. in order to flush tne sample Gross Alpha-quarterly-TI [' line. Tleen two gallon grab Gamma Spec quarterly-TI sample.is taken from the tsui lding faucet qua rt er l y . tv Peach Bottcm Well at Plant Site. Same as location 10 above Same as' location 10 abowe. Site-Infor- 1400* SSE of Units mation Center 2 and 3 40 Peach Bottom Well in $tte Area. Same as location 1U above -Same as location tu above Site Area 1.5 miles SW of Units 2 and 3. 7 Darlington. AID. 9.6 miles SSE of. Same as location 1U'above Same as~ location 1U above-Area (control) Units 2 and 3 in - Hartford Co.. AID . D. Air Particulate - Air Iodine 1A weather Station On-site at weather 'About 1 cf m cont irr*ous f low foross Beta-week ly-CH ! si Station st. 0.3 miles through glass fiber flaters Gamme spec monthly-CH SE of Units 2 and 3. (appron; 2- diameter) which
..are installed for a week--
and replaced. IB Weather Statton On-site at weather ,. Atmout 1.cfm continuous flos Gross Beta-meekly-CH. l through glass fiber and char-~ Gamma Spec monthly-CH s2 Station s2 0.5 miles NW of Units 2 and 3. -coal filters (approx; 2* ' I-131-eeekly-TIL
' diameter) which are i n~.
stalled for a week and replaced. OOC laboratory 4 l l i i - ,, es ), .,v...._.. , , ., .3 ....r.y- - , , . - -
, 3 y 6- . . . - - . . .w,. %. .w :, . . . , , , . , . , , - 4..~. ...,'g
t t l TABLE 8-I: Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental . esonitoring Program. l (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989.
- 1 ENVIRONIGENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION E DISTANCE COLLECTION teCTHOD ANALYSIS AND tOCATION DESCRIPTION FROGR PEACH BOTTOtt 'AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERFOResED-CONSULTA84T D. Air Particulate - Air Iodine (contd.)
i ' 12 weather Statlon On-site at weathee Same as notatton_th ' Gross f+ eta-meemly-Tto at Statton si. O.3 miles Gamma Spet mon t M y - 7 3 a , SE of Units.2 and 3. 1-131-TI 2 Dn-Site - 130' On-site. 0.9 miles SE Same as location to 'Same as location 18 Sector Hit 6 of Units 2 and 3. 3A Delta. PA - 3.6 miles SW of Units Same as location 18' Same'as location 18' Substation 2 and 3. 0.5 miles N of tearyIand border. 4A Conowingo Dam - 8.6 miles SE of Units .Same as tocation IB Gross Beta- eekly-TI*' Power House Roof 2 and 3 on Power House Ganana Spec monthly-T!
- Roof in Cecil County. 00 0 . 3 48 Conowingo Dam - 8.6 miles SE of Units- Same'as'socation 18 Same as location 3A -;
Power House Roof 2 and 3 on Power House , (control) Roof in CectI County. 90D. 5 Wakefield. PA '-4.6 miles E of Units 'Same as'tocation 18 Same as location 18 2 and 3. 68 Holtwood Dam - 5.8 miles NW of Units" .Same as location 1B .Same as location IB
- Hydroelect ric '2,and'3.
. Station (control) 120 2301 tserket Street 62 miles Ep6E of Unitsu. Some as location 18 Same as location is ' Philadelphia..PA '2 and 3 on.the Roof of (control) 2301 Rearket Street. j . , 14 ' Peters Creek 1.9 miles ESE of Units -Same as location 18 Same as" location 18 2 and 3. 4 eQC laboratory S
. a
. . . . ~ _- . .. _ _ . __ .. . . _ . - _ _ . . . . . , . . . .. _ _ _ _ _
f TABLE B-I: Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. ENVIRONMENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION 8. DISTANCE ' COLLECTION METHOD ANALYSIS AND LOCATION DESCRIPTION FROGA PEACH BOTTOat AND FREQUENCY FREOUENCY PERFORetED-CONSULTANT D. Air Particulate - Air Iodine (contd.) 15 Slaver Spring 3.6 miles N of Units same es location IB S.sme as - location 1A Road 2 and 3. 17 Rivervieu Road 4.0 miles ESE of units Same as location 1B Same'as' location 1A 2 and 3. 31 Pliottoon Road 4.9 miles SE of Units Same as location 1B Some as location 1A 2 and 3 near Pilot-town Road. 32 State Hill Road 2;7 miles ENE of units Same as location IB Same as l'ocation 1A 2 and 3 near State Hi11. Road. 33A Fulton heather Fulton Main Weather .Same as location'18'- Same as location 1A Station Station 1.7 miles
- ENE of Units 2 and 3.
38 Peach Bottom Road: 3.0 miles E'of Units same as location 18' ' Same as' location f A -- 2 and 3 near' Peach Bottom Road. E. Milk A Regional Farm A West Side of Pond Two gallon grab sample I-131-Blueekly. monthly **-TI. (control)' (distant). is collected at each farm Gamma Spec-quarterly-TI.CH8 from a' bulk tank containing Sr-89.90 quarterly-TI.CH* milk biweekly white cows _' are on pasture. monthly otherwise. B Regional Farm B West ulde of? Pond Same as Farm A I-131-Blueekly. monthly **-TI
'(control) . (distant) r. - Spec-quarterly-TI' Sr-89.90-quarterly-TI
*OC laboratory
**ttonthly from December through March when'coes are.off pasture.
i' i: ._
&.,. ,, ,mmo.- ,..-,e, --
m--g - - - p ,f g .a --3
.y . . , , %..wm-- % v-y f.w,' %-g%g vm, My ,=- .c, 9-g 3 y- -c- ,_
,y,. _s, - n _ wg=
S TABLE B-Ir Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. COLLECTION METH00 ANALYSIS AND. ENVIRONMENTAL LOCAT IOat DIRECTION & DISTANCE FREQUENCY PERFOResED-CONSULTANT FROM PEACH BOTTON- AND FREOUENCY LOCATION DESCRIPTION E. Milk (contdj Same as Farm A e= cept 1 - 131 -quar t er l y.-T i kegional Farm C West side of pond C collection frequency mas. (control)' (distant) quarterly-throughout the yecr. East side of pond Same As Farm C Same as farm C D Regional Farm D East side of pond. Same'as Farm C.. Same as Farm C E 8tegiona l Farm E (control) (distant) West side of pond Same as Farm A Same . as f are B ' G Regtonal Farm G (near)
-west side of pond Same as Farm A 'Same as Farw A J Regional Farm J (near)'
East. side of pond Same as Farm C Same as Farm C L Regional Farm L (intermediate)~
-East < side of' pond' Same as Farm C Same as Farm C m Regional Farm M
.(intermediate)
East side of pond-- Same as Farm A Same as Farm'A N Regional Farm N (intermediate) west side of pond Same as Farm A 'Same as Farm B O Regional Farm O (near):
- - _ .- ~- - - = - - == . _ _ _.
~
TABLE 8-Is Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental Isonitoring Program. - ch 5 (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. ENVIRONIsENTAL . LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION ISETHOD - ANALYSIS AND - , ,t LOCATION DESCRIPTION FROel PEACH BOTTOM AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERFOReIED-CONSULTANT. i F. Soll 1AA Discharge - Locateo about 2400' Three 2*' plugs of soll. Gross Beta-semiannually-CH Canat Bank SE of Ure i t s / mms J 4-E" oeep taken from a -
'Sr-89.90-semlannually-CH on the discharge 4 ft area and mined. Gamma Spec-sentannually-CH.
canal bank. ~ A composite of approst-
- mately 1000 g.is olaced in a plastic bottle and shipped to laboratory sent-annually.
130* Sector On-site 0.9 miles'SE' Same as location 1AA' Gross' Beta-semiannual'y-CH.TI* l 2 Hill of Units 2 and 3. Sr-89.90-seelannually-CH.TI* Gamme Spec-semiannuaiiy-CH.TI* 3A Delta. PA - 3.6' mites Sw of Units - Same as' location IAA . Same:as location 1AA Substatton 2 and 3 0.5 miles N i of tearyland border. AN Conowingo Dam - Environmental monitor- .Same as locatton 1AA Same as location.1AA Environmental ins Statton on west Station (control) -shore upstream of Conowingo' Hydroelectric Statton about 8.6 miles- ' SE of Unita 2 and 3. 5 wakefield. PA 4.6 miles E'of'- Same'as? location-IAA. Same as location 1AA Units.:2.and.3.
^
6G Holtmood. PA 5.8 miles NW of Units Same'as location 1AA .Same as location'7' (control) 2 and 3 near Holtmood Dam in Lancaster Co. 4 4 1 a
*OC laboratory 0
4 . - - - .. . -
+ ' . . . .___% ' .
,___wm*4-sp .r.,4..J. e 3A., _yy -gsi .i_.,_.,m.. . .m_,_____.___._,___. .
,_____.,___.______n
______s_ __ __,__q.g
.w es, TABLE B-Is Sample Collection and Analysis Program f or the Radiological Environmental esonitoring Program.
j (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. t. 1 ENVIRONeAENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLE CTION ISETHOD ANALYSIS AND LOCATION DESCRIPTION ' f'R0al PEACH BOTTOst AND FREQUEhCV FREQUENCY PERFORetED-CONSULTANT
~
G. Sediment On-site i ts the Station Recently deposited hedt- Gross Alpha-sentennually-TI 188 Peach Bottom bross Se t a-semiaraiual l y-T ! Dfscharge Canal Discsiarge canal.'3300* ment co l lec t ed tielow the SL of Units 2 and 3. waterline, mon t til y Gamma Spec-seelannually-TI 1x Cooling Tower About 1750' ESE'of Same as location 1BB Same as l oca t t or: 158 Pond 81 Units 2 and 3. Conomingo Pond I.ocated in Conomingo Same as location 1BB Same as location 180 ' , 4J net trap 15 Pond about 1.4 miles < SE of Units 2 and 3. .. 4D .Conomingo Pond. 500* downstream from Same'as-location 188 Same as location 188 PA the. Peach Bottom Station discharge. 4T Conowingo Pond Near. middle of Cono-Same as ~ location IBB Same'as location ?M - near Conowingo' wingo Pond, about 8.1 Dam miles SE of Units.2 i and 3. 6F Holtwood Dam S.8 miles NW of Units Same as.locatton 188 'Same as locatton 188 East shore up- 2 and 3 near Holteood strams (control) Dem in Lancaster Co. i f
. 6 4
e i 4 ___ _r __
*' 'D 'Pf' _
a- _..I'-'. w... __M'_4 _ dMm '@rYP9'- Md" - aim 9.
'. O E $ E E E - g. . g g, g g g g<
J TABLE B-1 Sample CoIIection and Analysis Program for'the Radiological Environmental IAonitoring Program, (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. ENVIRONIBENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION BeETHOD' ANALYSIS ANO DESCRIPTION FROGA PEACH BOTTOGE AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PER F OResED-CONSULT ANT . . LOCATION H. Fish In dia. charge ras al, tie - F ist, from t wo gr oups $r-89.90--qua r t es l y - CP 1FE Peach Bottom - Discharge Canal tween the Peach Bottom s egu esent iseg g2redatov and Gamma Spec quarter 6y-CH units 2 and 3 liquid bottom teeoes specie =>' raowaste discharge and collected by electrofishing canal emit, or-other fishery gear. 1 quarterly. IX Cooling Tower About 1750' ESE of' Same as location IEE Same as locationf1EE Pond 81 Units 2 and 3. Conowingo Pond Located in Conomingo -Same as location 1EE Sr-89.90-quarterly-CH.TI* 4 Pond below discharge Gamma Svec-quarterly-CH TI* l of Units 2 and 3. .. holteood Pond Located in Holtwood Same as location IEE' Same as. location 4
~
6 (control) Pond Ntf of Us si t s 2 ' and 3.
*0C laboratory
( wi.,'.w.-
*- "" ,.wo-*- i p,.,, ,
,,w.. , , , . _ , _
a TABLE B-I: Sample CoIIection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental 900nitoring Program, (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. DIRECTION 8. DISTANCE COLLECTION METHOD. ANALYSIS AND ENVIRONa8 ENTAL LOCATION .FREOUENCY PERFOResED-CONSULTANT DESCRIPTION FROtt PEACH BOTTOnl AND FREQUENCY LOCATION I. Vegetation Located i t. Site Area. Stems. leaves, arid fruit. 1-131-11.0H+ 1 . Peach Bottom of vegetation co l lesc t ed Gamma Saeet -11.CM Site Area spring, summer and Sr- 89.90- T I .CH' falB. 3.6 miles SW of Units Same as location I I-131-11 3A Delta substation Gamma Spec-TI 2 and 3. O.5 miles N Sr-89,90-TI of 90eryland border-Conowingo Dam Environmental Monitor-' Same as.Iocatton 1 Same as locatton 3A AN (control) ing Station on west shore upstream'of.Cono-wingo Hydroelectric Station ateout 8.6 miles SE of Units 2 and 3. 4.6 miles'E of Units Same as location 1 Same as location 3A' 5 wakefield. PA 2 and 3. Holtwood, PA 5.8 miles Nw of Units .Same as Iocation.1 3ame as location 3A ~ 6D (control). 2 and'3 near.Holtuood Dam-in Lancaster Co.
~
Colora, esD - 9.9 miles ENE of Units ..Same as location I Same as locatton i ~ 8 (control)- 2 and 3 in Cecil Co. Same as location 3A' 23 Peach Bottom ~ Off-site. Hill 1.0 miles- 'Same as location 1 150' Sector SSE of Units.:2 and 3. Hill
*OC laboratory M MO M' O E .' M E
N - . O h' ;E ' E E E E E E @ g 'M ~ [E g @ TA3LE B-I Sample Collection and Analysis Program'for the Radiological-Environmental Monitoring Program. (contd.) Pesch Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. i ENVIRONIGENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECTION METHOD' ANALYSIS ANO .. LOCATION DESCRIPTION FROIf PEACH BOTTOG4 AND FREQUENCY FREQUENCY PERFORWED-CONSULTANT J. Environmental Dosteetry - TLD At each of the following locations t her e are 2 environmental dosimeter packets with 4 TLDs pee' package. i One packet is replaced monthly, and one quarterly. The packets f or each time period are collected and replaced on the same day at all the stations. lA Peach Bottom On-Site. O.3 miles SE Procedure for collection TLD-monthly and'ouarterly-TI
' Weather of Units 2 and 3. is described in the Statton No.1 placement procedure
}
-in Sectton.III., A.
. le Peach Bottom- On-Site, 0.5 miles NW TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI Weather- of Units 2 and 3 Station No.2 IC Peach Bottom On-Site, 0.9 miles SSE TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI South Sub- of Units 2 and 3. statton Road 1D Peach Bottom On-Site. 0.7 miles SE TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI 1400 Sector of Units 2 and 3. j Site Boundary SE Peach Bottom. On-Site, 0.6 miles NNW TLD-monthly'and quarterly-TI 350 0 Sector of Units 2 and 3.
$lte Soundary i~ -TLD-monthly and quarterly-T!
IF Peach Bottom On-Site. 0.6 miles SSW ( 200* Sector of Units 2 and.3. Hill. [ IG Peach Bottom. On-Site, 0.7 miles WNW TLD-monthly and quarterly-T!
- North 'of Units 2 and 3.
Substation - IH Peach Bottom 'On-Site. 0.6 miles W TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI Site 270' - of units 2'and 3.' Sector H111-b d 4 5 w d 1 a.,n:,..- . . . ..p, _Y s. -q~ - ..,m - + . . - -- ('w v ,.,ay,ye 3 m -w-- , , ,s. p--y.+ , ., ,---_n m .,- - _.,_-_rv_..,.,a,.,.a:c_e .e-r,
4 4 4 TABLE B-I Sample Collection and Analysis Program for the Radiological Environmental ABonitoring Program. , (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. ENVIRONesENTAL LOCATION- DIRECTION & DISTANCE COLLECf!ON esETHOD ANALYSIS AND . LOCATION DESCRIPTION froes PEACH 80TTOef AND FREQUENCY. FREOUENCY PERFOnesED-CONSULTANT J. Environmental Dosimetry - TLD (contd.) II Peach Bottom On-Site.'O.6 miles SSE Procedure for collection i s .- TLD-munthly and quarterly-TI South of Units 2 and 3. described in the placement Substation procedure in Section III.. A. IJ Peach Bottom On-Site. 0.7 miles S TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI-Site 180* of Units 2 and 3. Sector Hill IL Peach Bottom Located near Unit 3 In- 1LD-monthly and quarterly-TI Unit 3 take structure; O.2 miles Intake EME of Units 2 and 3. . IM Peach Bottom Located near Canal Dis- TLD-monthly.and quarterly-TI Canal Discharge charge structure; 3.0 miles 4 .SE of Units 2 and 3. 1NN Peach Bottom On-Site. 0.5 miles WSW TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI Site of Units 2 and 3. 2 Peach Bottom On-Site..O,9 miles SE TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI Site 130' of Units 2 and 3. l Sector Hill 3A Delta. PA 3.6 mile's 3W of Units TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI-l Substation 2 and 3. 4K Conomingo Dam On roof of Cono=singo TLD-monthiy and quarterly-TI Power House Power House. 8.6 miles, I Roof SE of Units 2 and 3. 5 - wakef ield, PA At Wakefield. PA. 4.6 TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI
~
l miles E of Units 2 and 3. 68 Holtwood Dam On roof.of Hydroelectric TLD-monthly and quarterly-TI l Hydroelectric, ' Station. 5.8 miles set of. i Station Units 2 and 3. l' l
.)-
l-l' l-
' M M MN M ~M M Ml M -
M: M M M M. MM M M' M M _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . , _ m, . . _,_ _ _._ , _ __, _ ._ ,_ .
E E E ' _. E E N E O TABLE B-Is Sample Collection and Analyals Progene f or the Medlelegical Enytrsneentet monitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1989. l ENVIRONMENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTaasCE COLLECTION WETHOD A8eALYSIS e LOCATIO8e DESCRIPTION FROsl PEACH 80TTOW A8ED FREQUE9eCV F#iOUEteCV PERFUh62D-COstStr YAsti J. Environmental Dosteetry - TLD (contd.) l 17tt - Pnlledelphia, PA On roof of 2301 star nie t Moccove e for cotlectinn is TLD-monthtv m'WStauerteeay-TI 2301 maraet Street. Phltasett6 a. desteibed in the plet - t r Street (controll PA. 62 miles EME of proccooce l e. Section III.. A. . Units 2 and 3. 14 Peters Creek 1.9 miles ESE tef Units TLD-mon +hty end couerterly-Tl $ 2 and 3 near the mouth of Peters Creek. 15 Silver Spring 3.6 miles H of Units TLD-monthly and couer*er t y-T! ; Road 2 and 3 neer $ttver , Spring stood. 96 -Nottingham. PA 12.8 miles E of Unita TLD-monthly and cauerteely-TI Substatton 2 and 3 at teottingnam (controt) Substetlon. TLD-monthly and truert er t y-T1 I 17 Riverwies 4.0 miles ESE of tIntts 2 , Road and 3 neer Rtwervlee Reed. 18 Feen Grove. PA 10 attes W of Unlts 2 YLD-monthly and esworteety-YI and 3 at Faen Grove. PA. f 19 Red Llen. PA ~20.6 miles tfMW of Units 1LD-monthly and teuerterty-TI (control) 2 end 3 at med Lion. PA. 20 Bel Alr. Asp 15.1 miles $5er of Units TLD-monthly sad teuerterty-T! [ Area (control) 2 and 3 near Del Air. FD. 218 Lancaster. PA 19 miles 'seems of Units 2 TLD-aanthly and esverterty-TI Area (control) and 3 neer Lancaster. PA. 22 Eagle Road 2.4 miles 808eE of Units . TLD-monthly and qsuerterly-TI i 4 2 aM 3 near siegle steed. t I e v>.+a-- =_'_-a---.- -__-_x__-.._ .- .t-- - - - - _ _ .- _ _ . _ , _ _ - . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - _ . - - _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ .-_=--2_-a _w.w _-___._=.x .._____2.-_ . _ . , __na,.-. -u:-,.a.-__.__.-__.--.w:s_._ ---..--w~.w,u _..-.-.-..--.-x --_n.--s-
l TABLE B-1: Seegle Col tect tors and Anot ysis Program for the Redlologlce s Envirorumentet GBonitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Po.or Statlon. 1999. l l ENVIRONIIENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTAseCE COLLECTION eBETHOD A8eALYSIS AseO LOCATION DESCRIPTION FROM PEACH 90TTON AteD FREQUENCY FREQUEpsCV PERFOseMED-COstSUI.TAeti J. Environmentet Dosimetry - TLD (contd.) 23 PeacJ. Buttom Off-site HiIt 1.0 miles Pr ocedure eer t o t lec t v ers is i t ts-mant h t , ones quar t er t v-i t i 150* Sector SSE of Units 2 er.rs 3 descr e tied t e. the piecement Hltt Off-site procedure in Section III.. A. 24 Herriswille. SIO 10.9 ottes ESE of Units T Lit-mont hl y and quarterty-TI Substetten 2 and 3 et Herres (control) Substetlon. 26 5Ien Road 4.2 el ees saw of Units TLD-manth*, and querterty-TI 2 and 3 near Stab Road. 27 N. Cooper 2.6 eites 5 of Units 2 TLD-mtruthly and quarterty-TI Road and 3 near M. Cooper Road. 39 Pilottown 4.9 elses SE of Units 2 TLD-monthly and quarter 1y-TI i Road and 3 near PStottowrs Road. YLD-monthly and queeterty-TI i 32 State Hitt 2.7 miles EteE of Units 2 Road and 3 near State Hitt Reed. 33A Fut ton anain 1.7 miles EME of Urlts TLD-monthty and quarter 9y-TI stoother Statton 2 and 3. 38 Peacti Bot tem 3.0 miles E of Units 2 and TLD-monthsy and quarterty-TI Road 3 near Peach Settom Road. + 40 Peach Bottom .In site eres about 1.5 TLD-monthly and guerterty-T! Site Area miles SM ef. Units 2 and 3. 42 Inuddy Rurs En- 4.2 miles peseM of Units TLD-eenthly and guerterty-T! l wironmental 2 and 3. Laboretory i 1' i
._ .~. . - -. _. ._. _ - _ .- . .. _ _ _ .. _ . . _. _ . _ _ __ _ _ . _ _ _ . . . . _ . . _ _ _ . . _ _ .
E f TABLE B-I: Sample Collect ton end Analysis Program for the Redlological Environmental monitoring Program. (contd.) Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station. 1999. EMv!RONMENTAL LOCATION DIRECTION & DISTA8eCE COLLECT 10se METHOD AMALYSIS Seed LOCATIO88 DESCRIPTION FROM PEACH 80TT0m A#eO FREOUEseCV FRE00E 98CV PERFORGED-COstSULTassi i J. Erwtronmental Dosteetry - TLD {contd.) 43 De umore Toen- 5.0 mile.s wee of units Pr oc edur e for e.o7:ectson 6s T LD -mont h s , e ws g..ar t er e y - f t ; ship School 2 and 3. oescrined 6n the otatement peocedure in Sectton III., 4 4 44 Goshen MIS * - 5.1 miles seE of Units TLD-monthly eno guarterty-TI Road 2 and 3. 45 PB-steeney 3.3 elles EME of Untts TLD-monthly one quarteety-Y1 j Lim 2 end 3. f 1 46 Broad Creek 4.5 elles SSE of Units TLD-monthly and guerterty-TI 2 and 3 near Flint-wille Road. 47 prood treek 4.3 miles 5 of Units TLD-monthly end guerterly-71 . Scout Camp 2 and 3. ! 4e sneeton Sub- 5.0 ml1es SSW of Units TLD-monthIy one guerter1y-TI
- statton 2 and 3.
49 Pe-Conestone 4.1 miles WSW of Units TLD-eenthly and ouerterty-TI Line 2 and 3. 50 TRAte5CO Pumping 4.9 etles u of Units TLD-ementhly end guerterty-ft Statton 2 and 3. 51 Fin Suty- ' 4.0 miles tfMur of Units TLD-monthly and quarteely-TI 1 station' 2 and 3.
+
l ! 4 4 I I i il - i w -
.m m a,w. -ae-e4vs w e- x--ew ., ,m-y~- ~e- , e %- a n- ge s 4 ene-- p ,-w- wwvm- ,---yww+s- +en- .-en- w , e- w - w a~e, www'- -m,-w.,e-m.av-x www
l i.
, s
-[s '$ ' s/f. [*f : .* :- .--- A
~ [-l r.
. .a .- ,, ,)fI s'
." (- - f tiggg)
N
'k[{* .
. /j l ElevlRenuEftist $assPLissG LCCATiens IE I Ptats arte sett meta me ./i-y .g.M- .. p[m _o;c .__
i ' - - ,
+
; = ,. . a n . se,,es . a,.t. n ,e. ., .
g . .@ _\ . is .- - - e * - im nam seine ms==t cant e.m f ,
, ,.O _.
Y l. t i / . : - f. , la nun eene status stenes et
'\,' is .f - O; i .c3 [-1 , j ,-y3
- p. v. m .,.-
&. ~,
My /._ _.5,' .., , im namunasis
,g.
c.t nace settes seets sessione se. f . . -f- IH p .k 9
-} -
to nace settes lef st?ses sitt seseast 4I / 1 y A . - it naps setm 3Se* sitte sitt seuenot , J-g , .,
-?-
g ,-- 'We / ,
\. m sit etaas settes %sceness camat - ettee essenste
/
,4 =, x. ,,
7 .e
,,,e
, ja
'r n= == sin - ae ut= mt is nace settes nem seestatem t
.,- <; e sura e_
[7 , i p' * "* I
> sA -
. '/t~j i "N*/ se P .ace setten I: t - rie" stete sitt g- t.p-y . : ,.5., ? .
~
- r. / vtars ,..- P 3 u etacs senes seem saatanen
, tZf' s 4 ,.
' IF '
Is resca estres sitt - tes'settes entt '
~
, ,h, Mr..., - -
ty
,- 8"
.-(. . . -( ,__.
tt rents genes emits 2 a 3 tavant
' 5 . l'. k' ,$' Y,. . ~
-2 Itt naps settee estis 2 & 3 estant teurosett
-'y-gy - . 1
,- ^ .j# '
V_' to etate sena tmat essosanst teeressit y'-
\ ~
, ID see .4 _, seus nace senes sitt - 2e# since w to etaca setten sin - siltiff mitetes
^ ,
s ;
, %,{y T sEE 2- 'g tv resca settes sitt - twomentam canne ;
l' ; ' p' 7
'# . as ~ Ptses estres seu coettes teste reus et
% tr n acs settes staista state m et
.' [ =.D m.
, == una is, nom =<
( _,. 3 40 co.,, i es comosince rue. en.
~;.-, es coussines rue att tear us. e t}]k h.
, ,. , - IC I '- \
ff g as comestase tone att tear me.15 23 23 nacs es,em tse'st ten esta ser sitt
.(( -
.,.,f,,- -
7'lf ~ 4 i ENVIRONIBENTAL SAllPLING LOCATIONS ON OR NEAR PEACH BOTTOM SITE . FIGURE I W _-_. W - - - W M m - M. M M .W _ _ = W W W W W W W W W W
I 1
,.i I l I
t E I 5
=
- 11 11=. ,
5 n s s
=
1 e e g a=xt! s 11 I s a!!sia! s , ! , 1 3 I!!Ihl
--I ! , ,a-
- R - -
's E : i I
- s 1i!!,, > ,
g...... - - . , - ,
,. . :; i 12 ,. .
i s r i i ! ! !! _ ! a. . . ! I s :.! Er i !!!!!!ig a! e s t e i e i e g i i ' ,; ; I r ! , i ig iII. -::! r = E !I i33;ii;; t i j!!Ill!ll ! g!!
!ii
. g ,
! illililiiiiiiiiiiii!!!!.! i!!r
- l l . . . . . . . . . . . u = = . . a s = = = = = ,: : n s = = - , , , , , n s
I i
't 6
/
J'i,., i)%)W la i w[ s l r
.s <
l l -
.. ...si ..,.
5
..). rs i
.. a 6i .
) > ul,I.' -.. ,
,J ', %s')\ l '
', o*
- c 9
. s. !< .
.s i .. ,' ,.)
- m lE '
N
~
E 3 p' ', g i j, ih.....ih( - \g mE i
! I ll A $
!s I
<8 s .
56'
\
8
/. '~'
I at j 9 i ! e S. : l, a
- cs S f=e , .. . :
I ' ,'s ' " "1 ,k * ' 3*N I '
+, <-
,d 1 l..- gue ,
....- -s3..
r
, j- , gu m E _g ;
'i
' \'ll4',, , ', 1 ,) , ;; " '
I
, . . I
- : y sg
'e* ::
si =
/** ;% \.I
- s ;
- 1. ,
- 8
[ I A W i
/pi :' .
i 'l '. .l$ 5 sie g I C .. , i .i r . t 4
- . .a, s l %
.; i, \* .
\., .. i I 's, :g
- IQ f
~
I % f I 1
< J A Il I .
q_.% A._.. . - _ y_m .m N h.~ b- - ka N h - ( __s ,I S \ k. ~k.
~
l . G7eEg m & Q m\ . 4 - q ,g Q % ;: y .
=1
' T"k-s?- h - W@g5 _l
,:og9W i
&+%el$w..- - ~~ --g
~X,-
n.-. 3 \. yr=ML_ .- 2 ?; 9 y9-~
.c ._ -
u . ~
> +? (. . :/-
'.. ,-m
~~
~o M h ,O,k ~ / D, .= /.s :: C
..:. - g
-r ,
=--
.g~
' ,q$$:. $ r
**~
=-=. &, . ' ,5j , .y< C.(%~~hW.9 =- % - ./
l'
,. ,. . s t TM; - -
ww"h - i?., %&w 12;$1=ggy_g A 9)%;- M f@...' y-kf%i:.y t Sc~e wt__4 - 3 m i
*"f
~
9 Fg : l-89 s J,. g;.
'y- ..s _. -
^ 4 f =y ,y %.-
r-4.u- Q= g.,%.=R
~4 i a.
- s
\
l; g m r .
.=.
k._ - a.
.sr<a,, ~@,
r 7 un .
.'n .diiLh. b Pw i :
-Ts -
w . e* ;- -' "Ei. -
- f. ._-
l 1-., - t . , .
.,= . . .
3 4 >\.s $*f_MT% - C b' s M,-
,,s . .., . ..
..:. q. cy -; l,
--.-.._. - y = .. ~ e -
a ,
. q .e. s -,
. (%. . --
- p ..
g --
. s.- ,
.:. .. g; .
, -- e - s
. p, .,., . . ,.3.
g.4 ie . j.g. % p .,.
. < - ( - ~ 1.-..._-
www.- 1 (-
- 7. /_ . ? .
)g IQ. '5 ~$, fQg j l - ~l-d '
~
~j"'= -
>F{' /n
- a. , ./ c.
.\6 ,.
i ,g ", f .qy g/, m ,'A. .- -)bO-" _,,,, k ,. ,,,,, ,,,,, p
'g<.M l -(
N
- p'
- . '4(&g-s%$ W b D: ,,G C? d _.
= "'4r.
- w. \' - m ~
E
.. !.- _ , ;- ..". , W
,,! .!!...!..!!.!!!!!!.!!!..!.!.!.!..!.!..!!! !I: -
li
~
. s . ; . , --
;; :::'J::";.-
m c.. ._ - s a tumoustum suruus smions .
/
M
^-N 0" At nimott oistances rnou etacu soiteu sitt lt. 'llllh.d.u.' , "!...
.. .... . . . . . . . . . . . ,,,... rinunt s
. gj I;
IJ 4 y r__ - _ ., - .
I I I I I I l DATA TABLES AND FIGURES PRIMARY LABORATORY I I I I I I I
I-l APPENDIX C: DATA TABLES AND FIGURES - PRIMARY LABORATORY TABLES Table C I.1 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Soluble in Surface Water I Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. j I Table C 1.2 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Insbluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station,1989. Table C 1,3 Concentrations of Gross Beta soluble in Surface Water I. Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,.1989. Table C I 4 Concentrations of Gross Beta Insoluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C 1.5 Concentrations of Trittium in Surface Water Samples i Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station,-1989. Table C-1.6 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C II.1 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Soluble in Drinking ! Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot- i I tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C-II.2 Concentrations of-Gross Alpha Insoluble in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the. Vicinity of Peach Bot-tem Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C-II.3 Concentrations of Gross Beta Soluble in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom-Atomic Power Station,-1989. Table C-II.4 Concentrations of Gross Beta Insoluble in Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C II.5 Concentrations of I-131 in Drinking Water Samples Col-1ected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C II.6 Concentrations of Trittium in Drinking Water Samples-Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Botton Atomic Power Station, 1989. a
I' Table C-II.7 . Concentrations Samples Collected inofthe Gamma Vicinity ofEmitters in DrinkinbWa Peach ttom Atomic Power Station, 1989. - Table C-III.1 Concentrations of Sr 89 and Sr-90 in Fish Samples Col-1ected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989.. Table C-III.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Fish Samples Col-1ected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power aI Station, 1989. g, ' Table C-IV.1 Concentrations of Gross Alpha,~ Gross Beta, and Gamma Emitters in Soil Samples Collected in the Vicinity of-Peach Botton Atomic Power Station, 1989. la 5! L I Table C-V.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate- 3 Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach _ Bottom 3'l Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C-V.2 Monthly and Yearly Mean Values of Gross. Beta Con- E' centrations'(E-3 pCi/cu. meter)zin_ Air Particulate ~ Wl Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom-Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C-V.3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. , Table C-V.4 Additional Gamma Emitters Found in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom 3~ Atomic Power Station, 1989. _EL , Table C-VI.1 Concentrations of I-131 in Air iodine Samples Col- , lected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power , Station, 1989. q l Table C-VII.1 Concentrations of Sr-89, Sr-90, and Gamma Emitters in E-l Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom 3 Atomic Power Stction, 1989. Table C-VII.2 Concentrations of I-131 in Milk Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, l 1989. Table C-VIII.1 Concentrations of Gross Alpha, Gross Beta, Tritium, ' and Gamma Emitters in Well Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Botton Atomic Power Station, e' 1989. g. Table C-IX.1 Concentrations of Sr-89 and Sr-90 in Vegetation: Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom E. Atomic Power Station, 1989.. 5-IJ
p I Table C-IX.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegeti; tion Samples ia Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Botton Atomic Power ,g Station, 1989. Table C X.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta, Sr 89, Sr-90, and Gamma II Emitters in soil Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Botton Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C XI.1 . Monthly TLD Results for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Sta-I Table C-XI.2 tion, 1989. Quarterly TLD Results for Peach Botton Atomic Power l Station, 1989. Table C-XI.3 Mean TLD Results from Peach Botton Atomic Power Sta-tion Site Boundary, Middle, and Outer Rings, 1989. Table C XI.4 Summary of the Ambient Desimetry Program for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table C-XII.1 Summary of Collection Dates for Samples Collected in ' the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Power Station, 1989. L FIGURES Figure C-1 Monthly Insoluble' Gross Beta Concentrations in Surface-
~
Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, , 1989. - Figure C-2 Monthly Soluble Gross Beta Concentrations in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of.PBAPS, 1989. i ) Figure C-3 Monthly Insoluble Gross Beta Concentrations in Drink-ing9. 19 Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, Figure C-4 Monthly Soluble Gross Beta Concentrations in Drinking i Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, I Figure C 5 1989. Mean Annual Cs-137 Concentrations in Fish Samples Col-1ected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-1989.- Figure C-6 Mean Annual Cs-137 Concentrations-in Silt Samples Col- : lected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-1989. l.I l Figure C-7 Mean Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations. in Air Particu-1 late Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS,1989.
- 3 L
l I . 75 _ - _ . _ _ j
i I Figure C 8 Mean Monthly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particu-late Samples Collected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1970-I 1989. Figure C-9 Mean Annual Cs 137 Concentrations in Milk Samples Col-1ected in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1971-1989. Figure C-10 Mean Monthly Ambient Gamma Radiation levels (TLD) in the Vicinity of PBAPS, 1989. Figure C-11 Mean Quarterly Ambient Gamma Radiation levels (TLD) in-the Vicinity of P8APS, 1973-1989. I I I I I1 I I I I I I IsJ
I TA6Lt C.I.1 C04CERTRATICHS OF SROSS ALPHA SOLUBLE IN SURFACE HATER SAMPLtB COLLECTtp IN THE VICDifff 0F PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC PCHER STATIQHe 1969 i Rt90'.TS D4 04ITS OF PCULITER 12 SIGMA COLLECTIGH 13A 136 1LL 1991 .f I PERIOD , JW4 69 < 0.6 c 0.7 < 0.6 < 0.6 f tB 69 4 0.6 < 0.9 < 0.6 C 0.6 , MAR 69 < 0.4 C 0.5 C 0.6 C 0.5 I APR 69 MAY 69 M4 69 JUL 69 2
< 0.6 C 0.6 t1 C 4.9 c 0.6
- 0.7' (1)
< 0.6 c 0.7-
< 0.5
< 0.9 C 0.7 c 0.5 W 0.4 t 0.9
< d.5 l
AUG 69 C1 't 0.9 C 0.9 C 0.9-I i StP69 C 0.2 41) < 0.9 -c1 . OCT 69 < 0.5 (1) < 0.9 < 0.9 HOV 89 < l C 0.6 C 0.6 <1 r Otc 09 < 0.6 < 1.0 < 0.7 c 0.9 t NEN4 0.6 2 0.9 0.7 1 0.3 C 0.7 < 0.6 I : TA6Lt C.I.2 I CG4CDURATIGHS OF GROSS ALPHA D490LU6Lt D4 $URFACE NATtR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITT OF PEACH DOTTOM ATDtIC POWER STATICH.1969 Rt9ULTS IN WiITS OF PCULITER 12 SISMA s I COLLECT 10H PtPIOD JN4 69 13A 12 ILL
< 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.2 1991 C 0.2 i
FEB 69 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 0.3 C 0.3 I t MAR 69 0.4 1 0.2 0.4 1 0.2 0.3 1 0.2 0.5 1 0.2 > 2 APR 89 1.3 1 0.6 C 0.3 C 0.3 0.4 2 0.3 ;
< 0.2 < 0.3 2 0.5 MAY 69 0.6 t 0.5 0.6 M4 69 < 0.3 (lI < 0.3 C 0.3 l
JUL 69 C 0.3 0.7 1 0.5 0.7 1 0.4 0.7 1 0.5. t AUG 69 < 0.3 2.3 2 0.9 0.7 2 0.4 0.6 1 0.3. I SEP 69 C 0.2 (1) 0.5 1 0.3 0.5 10.3' OCT 69 < 0.3 (l1 0.6 1 0.4 0.6 2 0.5 HOV 69 < 0.3 0.9 1 0.5 0.6 2 0.4 - 0.5 - t 0.4 Otc 69 0.2 2 0.2 0.3 2 0.2 0.3 1 0.2 < 0.2 MEMI 0.4 1 0.6 0.6 1 1.3 0.5 t 0.4 0.5 1 0.4 I (1) Stt PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLAHATION I : t 1 I
.- _ . _. . . +
I II TABLE C.I.3 CCHCDRRAT10Hs OF 000SS BETA SOLUBLE IN SURFACE NATER SAMPLES I. 1 COLLECTt0 IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTtM ATOMIC PCWER STATICH.1969 2 PESULTS IH tht!TS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SISMA COLLECTION 13A 136 ILL 1791 - PERIOD ) JAH 69 3.7- 1 0.9 3.0 10.6- 2.5 - 1 0.6 2.9 1 0.9 ; FE6 69 2.2 1 0.9. 2.3 2 0.9 . 2.0 1 0.9 2.5 2 0.9 l MAR 69 f.1 1 0.7 2.1 2 0.6 3.5 1 0.9 3.2 t 0.9 ; APR 69 3.5 1 0.9 5 11 7 11 1.9 1 0.6 : MAY 69 2.0 2 0.0 2.5 1 0.9 1.5 1 0.6 2.1 1 0.6 JLSI 69 2.2 1 0.6 (1) 2.7 1 0.9 C 1.3 JUL 69 2.5 1 0.9 2.0 1 0.9 t.3' 2 0.9 2.6 1 0.9 AUG 69 3.1 1 0.9 2.6- 1 0.9 2.7 1 0.9 3.1 1 0.9 ; SEP 69 2.2 1 0.7 (1) 4 11 4 1f e OCT 69 3.1 1 0.9 (1) 3.0 1 1.0 9 21-IW 69 t.1 1 0.9 < 0.6 3.0 2 1.0 3.0 1 1.0 l- DEC 69 4.0' i 1.0 1.6 2 0.6 ' 3.1 1 0.9 2.6 ' 1 0.6 NEM4 2.7 1 1.4 2.5 1 2.3 3.2 2 2.7 3.2 1 3.9 , I , t 4 TABLE C.I.4 COHCtHTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA INSOLL2LE IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLt3 COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, t969
' i.
RESULTS IH LNITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SISMA COLLECTICH 13A 136 1LL If91 W PERIOD =' JM169 1.4 1 0.5 0.4 1 0.4 C 0.4 0.6 1 0.4 PE6 69 0.5 1 0.4 2.4 2 0.5 0.6 1 0.4 C 0.4 MAR 69 0.4 1 0.4 1.0 1 0.5 0.6 2 0.4 1.2 1 0.5 APR 69 6.0 1 0.6 0.5 1 0.4 1.2 1 0.5 1.6 2 0.5 MAY 69 1.0 1 0.5 1.0 1 0.5 3.2 .t 0.6 4.5 1 0.7 , Akt 69 2.2 1 0.6 (1) 1.3 1 0.5 1.6 .* 0.5 , JUL 69 0.6 1 0.5 1.0 2 0.6 1.2 1 0.5 1.3 1 0.5 ; AUG 69 < 0.4 7.3 1 0.7 1.4 1 0.4 0.6 1 0.4
- SEP 69 C 0.3 (1) 1.3 1 0.4 0.9 1 0.3 OCT 69 0.5 1 0.4 (1) '.1 1 0.5 t.3 1 0.6 !
lW 69 0.9 1 0.5 2.0 1 0.5 1.2 - t 0.5 1.0 ,t 0.5 , DEC 69 0.5 2 0.4 C 0.4 0.6 1 0.4 < 0.4 i MEAN 1.2 1 3.2 1.6 14.4- 1.2 1 1.5 -1.4 1 2.3 TABLE C.I.5 CCHCtHTRATICHS OF TRTIT!tDi IH SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIOHe 1969 . RESULTS IN LNITS OF PCI/ LITER 2 2 SISMA COLLECTION 13A 136 iLL 1I91 r PERIOD ' JAH-MAR 69 90 t 50 140 t 50 90 1 40 ; APR. AJ4 69 120 1 50 60 2 40 70 1 50 i JUL.S!P 69 160 1 50 160 1 40 230 1 50 ' OCT.DEC 69 140 t 50 160 1 40 170 2 50 l l MEAH 130 1 60 140 1 60 140 1 150 Ei 111 SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLAHATICH E , h
mM M M M M M M M M M MWeemW W W-.
, TABLE C-I.6 (XINCENTRATIONS OF GArtth EFfITTEPS IN SURFACE HATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTCM ATOPtIC PUMER STATICH,1969 RESULTS IN LD4ITS OF PCI/ LITER 1 2 SIGPtn '
STATIC 4 COLLECTION CX)DE PERIOD K-49 794-5 4 CD-56 FE-59 CD-69 2H-65 ZR-95 M5-95 CS-134 CS-137 . 84-149 (A-149 - ; fLL JN169 <5 < 9.3 < 0.4 < 0.9 < 9.4 < 0.7 < 0.8 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 9.4 C3 < 2 FEB 09 <5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 0.3 < 9.3 <2 < 9.9 MAR 89 <5 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.3 C 9.3 C2 < 1 4 APR 89 <5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 0.7 < 9.4 < 0.3 < 9.3 <2 < 0.9 PtRY 89 <7 < 9.3 < 9.4 < t.9 < 9.4 ~ 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 9.4 <4 < 2 i JL.94 69 12 ' i 5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 0.3 C 9.6 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 .<2 I
< 9.7 JUL 69 <6 < 9.3 < 9.5 <1 < 9.3 < 0.7 < t.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 0.4 <7 < 3 AUG 89 <5 < 0.3 < 0.4 <1 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.9 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 19 < 5 SEP 89 <4 < 0.2 < 0.3 < 9.7 < 0.2 C 9.5 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 <3 < t OCT 89 19 26 < 0.3 < 9.4 < 0.6 < 0.3 < 9.7 < 9.6 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 0.3 <3, < 1 NOV 89 <4 < 0.2 < 0.2 < 9.6 < 0.2 < 0.4 < 9.5 < 9.3 < 9.2 - < 9.2 <2 < 9.6
. DEC 69 < 39 < 9.9 < 9.9 <3 <2 <2 <1 < 0.9 C 9.9 < 9.7 <3 < 5 i MEAN 8 i 15 < 0.3 < 9.4 < f.9 < 0.4 < 9.7 C 9.8 < 0.4 < 9.4 - < 0.4 <4 < t.9 i 1999 JaH 69 <5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.6 ( 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <2 < t.9 FEB 89 <5 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <2 -< t.9 ! tthe 89 <6 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 9.9 < 9.4 - < 9.6 < 9.6 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 9.3 <3 < 1 I APR 89 <4 < 0.3 < 9.3 < C.8 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 0.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 0.4 <3 < t 1 remY 09 - <6 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 9.9 < 9.3 < 9.5 < 0.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.4 <4 < 2 a JA4 89 <5 < 0.2 < 9.3 < 0.6 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <2 < 9.6 JUL 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 9.4 < 9.7 .< 0.6 < 9.4 '< 0.3 < 9.3 <5 < 3 l AUG 69 <4 < 0.3 < 9.3 <1 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <e < 4 }i SEP 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 . < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 < 2 ' OCT 89 <5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 0. 7 . < 9.3 < 9.6 < 0.E. < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 < 1 HDV 69 6 14 < 9.2 < 9.2 < 9.5 < 9.2 < 9.4 < 0.5 - < 9.2 < 0.2 < 9.2 <2 < t.9 ' DEC 89 <6 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 0.7 < 9.4 < 0.4 < 0.3 <2 '
< 9.9 '
{^ MEAN 5 i1 < 9.3 < 9.3' < 9.8 < 0.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 < t.6 1
, t 1
4 b
}
r
. .<+r-.+pa. .e ,-w-w..%>--v.e~
-e.. _.J -
- , , , , , , ,v.- . +m- w e .. ,,r- as -w # .--- % ww, g , -y +%..,,w ,-eyi -,w. . - - --,r..me.y-e,%-,-e.e. ,+ -,4e, -n-wr.a.,. ww ,,.----w-,,w.-
TABL2 C-I.6 (X)MCEP4T9ATIONS OF GArten ErtITTERS IN SUrraCE METER SAMPLES CDLLECTES D4 THE VICDfITY OF PEACH COTTOM ATOPtIC PG4EW STATION.1969 PESULTS D44.94173 OF PCI/LITEP i 2 SI9th STATIO4 COLLECTIG4 cooE PewIUo K-49 r94-54 co-5s FE-59 co-se ats-65 s-95 te-95 CS-336 - cS.t37 eA-949 tA.349 13A JAN 89 <4 < 9,. 2 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.5 < 9.5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <2 < 9.8 FEB 69 <4 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 C 9.6 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <2 < 0.9 PtMP 69 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 0.3 <2 <1 APW 89 <6 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 0.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <2 < 9.9 MAY 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 0.8 < 0.3 < 0.7 < 0.9 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 9.4 <3 <t JtD4 89 <5 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.6 < 0.3 < 9.5 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <1 < 0.7 JUL 89 9 26 < 9.3 < 9.4 <1 < 9.4 < 9.7 < 1.9 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 0.3 <5 <3 [ AUG 69 <8 < 9.6 < 9.8 <2 < 9.5 < 1 <2 < 9.9 < 9.7 < 9.6 < 29 <9 SEP 89 2 16 < 0.3 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 9.4 < 0.7 < 9.6 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 9.3 <4 <2 OCT 89 <5 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 0.3 < 0.6 < 9.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 9.3 <3 <2
- MOV 89 <4 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 9.3 < S.3 < 9.3 <2 <1
; DEC 69. <4 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.7 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <1 < 9.6 i
Heme 5 24 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.8 < 9.3 ( 9.7 < #.8 < 0.4 < 9.4 < 9.3 <4 < t., 138 JAN 09 49 2 19 < 9.5 C 9.6 <2 < 9.5 <1 <1 < 9.6 < 9.6 < 9.5 <6 <3 FEB 89 <4 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 0.6 < 9.3 < 9.2 < 9.3 <2 <t j PtMF 89 <5 < 9.3 < 0.4 < 9.9 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 9.6 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 0.3 <4 <2 4 APW 89 12 15 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 9.3 < 0.4 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 C5 <2 NEY 89 <4 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <4 <2 I JUL 69 <6 < 9.4 < 9.5 <1 < 9.4 < 9.6 <1 < 9.5 C 9.4' < 9.4 <9 <4 ; SUG 89 <4 < 0.3 < 9.4 <1 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.2 < 19 <6 , ten 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.5 <1 < 9.4 < 9.8 < 9.9 < 0.5 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 19 <5' ! h DEC 69 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <4 <1 J MEst '19 1 23 < 9.3 < 9.4 < f.9 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 0.3 <6 <3 i MEst ALL STATIUMS 7 i 13 < 9.3 < 0.4 '< 9.9
< 9.4 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 6.3 <4 < 2.9 i
i
- s. . _'_ _ . ~_. . _ . _ . . . . . _ _ . . _ _ _ . . - _. _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ . . _ . _ . . _ . _ _ . _ . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .
i
)
I i TA6Lt C.II.t CONCtHTRATICHS OF 6Rott ALPHA 90LupLt IN DRDED# MAf tR SAMPLtB COLLtCTED De THE VICD4ETT OF PEACH DOTTOM ATOMIC MNER STATION 1969
)
j RESULTS D4 WITS OF PCULITER t t $10MA COLLtci!0H Pt#100 4L 6I )1 C 0.4 c 0.7 ' I JAN 09 j FE6 09
- 0.6 4 0.7 )
MAN 09 c 0.6 < 0.7 : APR 69
- 0.7 < 0.6 i MAY 69 C 0.4 4 0.6 '
I # 4 69 C 0.8 C 0.7 . JUL 69
- 0.7 .t 0.6 !
AUG 69 < 0.7 <1 ! StP 69 ei ci l OCT 69 < 0.7 C 0.7 I HW 69 Dtc 09 MEW 4 c1 ct C 0.7
<1 c1
< 0.6
.i
?
i I TABLE C.II.2 CDHCtiffRATIONS OF 6ROSS ALPHA IH90LUBLE D4 DRDED# HATER SAMPLES COLLECTED De THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC PfMER STAT 10He 1969 RESULTS IN WITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 310MA j l I COLLECTIGH PERIOD JW4 69 4L 61 c 0.4 C 0.3 I FE6 69 < 0.2 C 0.3 - MAR 69 0.2 1 0.2 0.7 1 0.2 APR 69 < 0.3 0.5 1 0.3 : MAY 69 0.6 1 0.4 0.4 1 0.4 ? M4 69 c 0.2 < 0.2 I JUL 69 AUG 69 SEP 69 DCT 69 0.5 0.2 C 0.3 C 0.3 1 0.3 1 0.2 C 0.3 C 0.3 0.3 1 0.2 0.9 1 0.5 f I 0.7 1 0.4 HOV 69 C 0.4 DEC 69 < 0.2 < 0.2 } MEAN 0.3 2 0.3 0.4 1 0.9 j TABLE C.II.3 COHCENTRATICHS OF GROSS 6tTA SOLWLt IN DRDK!He NATER SAMPLES i COLLECTED D4 THE VICD4ITT OF PEACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWER STAT 10He 1969 l RESULTS IH WITS OF PCULITER t t SIGMA COLLECTION 4L 61 I I PERIOD JW4 69 PtB 69 3.5 2.2 1 0.9 1 0.9 3.4 t.3 1 0.9 1 0.9 " l MAR 69 2.9 1 0.9 2.9 1 0.9 I APR 69 MAY 69 M4 69 JUL 69 9 C 0.6 11 2.7 1 0.9 2.4 1 0.9 6 2.4 2.3 2.0 1 0.6 1 0.9 11 2 0.9 I 3.0 1 0.9 I AUG 69 5 11 SEP 69 4 11 3 11 OCT 69 4 21 4 11 NOV 69 3.0 1 1.0 3 11 DEC 69 3 11 2.7 1 0.9 MEAH 3.4 1 4.0 3.3 1 2.4 I
II TA4Lt C.t!.4 CONCENr#ATIONS OF 4R099 DETA D490LLMt D4 DRD4;ING WAf tR DAMPLt$ COLLLCTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATOMIC PCNtR STATION 1999 I ] pt9ULTS IN LHITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SleMA COLLECTION 4L 61 l PERIOD i
.......... ............. ............. 1 JAH 69 0.7 1 0.5 0.6 1 0.5 FtB 09 < 0.4 < 0.4 !
MAR 69 C 0.4 0.6 t 9.4 l' APR 69 0.9 1 0.5 0.6 1 0.5 MAY 69 0.6 1 0.6 2.4 1 0.6 M4 69 0.6 1 0.5 2.3 2 0.5 j JUL 69 1.0 4 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 , 0.7 1 0.4 ( 0.4 AUG 69 SEP 69 0.5 1 0.3 0.4 1 0.3 OCT 69 HW69 0.5 0.6 1 0.4 1 0.6 t.4 1.2 2 0.6 1 0.5 ld g, Dtc 09 < 0.4 0.5 1 0.4
- MEAN 0.6 1 0.4 1.1 1 1.6 5 1 TABLE C.II.5 00HCtHTRATIONS OF I.131 D4 DRDEIHS WATER SAMPLt$ COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF Pf.ACH DOTTOM ATCMIC POWER STATICH.1969 ,
l ptsVLTS D4 LHITs OF PCI/ LITER
- a sleMA '
COLLECTION 4L 61 l PERIOD ' JAH 69 C 0.07 0.22 1 0.04 i Ff6 69 < 0.00 < 0.05 ?
' MAR 69 C 0.04 < 0.10 APR 69 < 0.07 < 0.1 2 MAY 69 < 0.09 < 0.06 )
# 4 69 < 0.07 < 0.07 JUL 69 < 0.1 < 0.05 AUG 69 < 0.07 < 0.04 '
l SEP 69 < 0.06
- 0.00 -'
OCT 69 < 0.06 C 0.05 1 I o DEN 69 < 0.1 < 0.06 ' I DEC 69 < 0.09 < 0.1 i i MEAN < 0.00 0.06 2 0.10 ' i TABLE C.II.6 CCHCtHTRATIONS OF TRITTILM IN DRD4;ING MATER SAMPLES COLLECTED . IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIGH,1969 - RESULTS IN LHITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SIGMA i COLLECTION 4L 61 i PERIOD JAH-MAR 69 120 1 40 150 1 50 1 APR.Mi 69 50 1 40 50 1 30 J JUL.SEP 69 240 1 50 190 1 50 ' l OCT.CZC 69 150 1 40 140 1 50 . l- .i l MEAH 140 1 160 130 ~1 120 I4 . Il l
~ Io r l . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ - . . . . _ _ . - _ - .-.. ___-__
(' W. meme me meeememeeme i-i l I TABLE C-II.7 CONCB4T9ATIW4S OF GArt1R EMITTEWS D4 ORDetING SSLTER SAMPLES l COLLECTED De THE VICD4ITY OF PEACM 80TTG1 A70P11C PGdEW STAT 30N.1989 ; RESULTS De (MITS OF PCI/ LITER 2 2. SIerth STATION COLLECTION CODE PERIOS K-49 794-54 (D-56 FE-59 CD-69 2H-65 2R-95 te-95 CS-s34 CS-137 BA-140 LA-149
- i 4L 'JdD4 89 <6' < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.7 < 9.3 C 9.3 < 9.3 <t < 9.9 FEB 69 < 29 < 9.5 < 0.6 <1 < 9.6 <1 <1 < 9.6 < 9.5 < 9.5 <4 <2 Mar 99 <6 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.4 <3 <1 ,
APW 89 <6 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.5 < 9.3 < 9.4 <3 <2 ! MAY 69 <4 < 9.3 < 0.3 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.6 .< 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 <1 l JUN 69 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7' < 0.7 < 9.6 < 9.6 < 0.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <t < 0.8 JUL 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 0.8 < 9.3 C 9.6 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <5 <2 AUG 89 <6 < 9.3 < 0.5 <1 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 1.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 19 <5 SEP 89 39 1 19 < 9.6 < 9.7 <2 < 9.6 < 1 <2 < 9.8 < 9.7 < 9.6 <9 <4 OCT O9 <5 < 9.3 < 9.4 <1 '< 9.4 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.4 <4 <2 . HOV 89 < 19 < 9.4 < 9.4 <1 < 0.4 < 9.9 < 9.9 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 0.4 <3~ <1 ! DEC 69 <7 < 9.4 < 0.4 < 9.9 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 6.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.4 <2 <1 IWAN. 9 2 16 4 9.4 < e.4 < 1.9 < 9.4 < 0.6 < S.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < S.4 <4 < t.9 i 61 JAN 69 <6 < 0.4 < 9.4 < 1.9 < 9.4 < 9.7 C 9.9 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 <1 FEB 89 11 29 < 9.4 < 9.4. < 0.9 < 9.4 < 9.8 < 9.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.4 <3 <2 i MAR 69 8 i7 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <1 < 9.7 i APW89 <4 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.8 < 9.3 < 0.7 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 <1 MAY 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.3 < 9.4 < 9.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 <1 . , JtA4 89. < 29 < 9.6 < 9.6 <1 < 9.6 < 1 <1 < 9.6 < 9.6 < 9.6 <3 <1 ! JUL 69 <6 < 9.4 < 9.4 <1 < 9.3 < 9.8 AUG 69 <6 <e
< 1.9- < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.4 . <6 <3 '
< 0.3 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 19 <4 SEP 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 <1 < 0.4 < 9.7 < 0.7 < 9.4 < 9.3 < 0.3 <4 <2 OCT 89 <5 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 1.9 < 9.3 < 9.7 < 9.8 < 9.+ < 9.4 < 9.3 <4 <t
<5 i tov 69 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.7 <F30 < 0.6 < 9.6 < 9.3 < 9.3 < 9.3 <3 <1 DEC 69
< 30 < 9.9 < 9.9 <3 <1 <3 <t < 9.9 < 9.9 < 9.7 <3 <5 i MEAN 9 2 16 < 9.4 < 9.4 < 1.1 < 9.4 < 9.9 < 9.9 < 9.5 < 9.4 < 9.4 <4 < 2.9 is I f 1
i
._...--,,,m , . . . . . 4 , . .., . , . . ~ ~ _ . . r_._ ,. ,... .. . . .-mm, , , , . , _ . _ . , , _ _ . . _ _ , . . - . . _ _ , ,_.
I! TABLE C.!!!.1 C04CDffRAT!aHS OF $#.69 AHO $#.90 2H FISH SAMPLt3 COLLECTED D4 THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATCMIC POWER STATIQi,1969 - PC1/ GRAM (ASH) PC1/69AM tWCT) i COLLECTION t t $10MA t t SIONA STATIGl MIDIA Daft SPEC 1tl $#.69 SR.90 SR.6 9 SR.90 Itt BOTTOM Ftt0ER 04/11/09 CATFIMt t 0.3 0.5 10.1 < 0.01 0.02310.0% L5/31/09 CATFISH < 0.9 0.51 1 0.09 c 0.M 0.024 1 0. 0M w
- DWO9/69 CATFISH t t 0.6 1 0.2 < 0.1 0.04 1 0.01 10/04/09 CATFISH c 0.1 0.39 1 0.07 c 0.007 0.020 1 0.0M !
NEW1 < 0.6 0.50 t 0.17 c 0.039 0.027 1 0.016 1X BOTTOM Ftt0tR M/t t/19 CATFISH <t 0.3 2 0.2 < 0.05 0.017 1 0.009 i 05/31/69 CATFISH < 0.2 0.66 2 0.05 < 0.006 0.025 1 0.002 > 0S/15/09 CATFISH < 0.1 0.23 2 0.04 < 0.009 0.015 1 0.002 10/ M/09 CATFIMt < 0.2 0.32 1 0.06 < 0.01 0.016 2 0.004 ; Mt#4 < 0.4 0. 56 1 0.40 < 0.019 0.019 1 0.009 el PRt0ATOR M/07/69 tAS$tt < 0.6 0.66 1 0.06 C 0.M 0. 041 1 0.0 M 06/06/09 31 BASS < 6 < 0.7 c 0.2 < 0.03 ' 06/0W69 2PI BASS < 0.3 0.4 2 0.1 < 0.01 0.021 2 0.0% 1 10/t0/09 SN BASS (1) MEAH < t.4 0.66 1 0.46 < 0.06 0.031 1 0.020 DOTTOM Ftt0ER M/11/6) BULLHtADS
- 0.7 0.73 1 0.07 c 0.03 0.0M t 0.003 !
06/20/09 CATFISH < 0.2 0.73 1 0.05 C 0.01 0.040 1 0.003
- 06/06/69 CATFISH C 0.4 1.3 1 0.1- c 0.02 0.075 t 0.006 10/tW69 OULLNEAD c 0.3 0.t5- t 0.07
- 0.000 0.000 1 0.002 ,
MEW 1 < 0.4 0.75 1 0.66 < 0.017 0.039 1 0.055 4J PREDATOR 04/07/09 LM BA99 C 0.3 0.5 1 0.2 C 0.01 0.023 1 0.006 M/06/09 SN BASb c 0.5 0.2 1 0.1 < 0.02 0.009 1 0.005 "' 06/0W69 SM BASS 0.8 1 0.2 0.31 1 0.06 0.02 1 0.01 0.024 1 0.005 i 10/10/69 SN BASS c 0.07 0.11 1 0.02 < 0.005 0.000 1 0.002 NE#1 0.27 1 0.36 0.26 1 0.34 0.014 1 0.015 0.016 1 0.017 BOTTCM FEE 0tp 04/11/09 BULLHEAD < 0.7 0.06 1 0.09 < 0.02 0.032 2 0.0t3 , M/M/09 CATFISH c 0,5 0.6 1 0.3 < 0.01 0.015 1 0.006 OWO6/69 CATFISH < 0.4 0.47 1 0.09 < 0.02 0.027 2 0.005 10/10/09 CATFISH t 9.1 0.36 1 0.03 c 0.006 0.020 2 0.002 MEAN < 0.4 0.56 i C.45 C 0.014 0.023 2 0.015 6 PREDATOR M/13/09 SM BASS c 0.2 0.3 1 0.1 < 0.010 0.012 1 0.005 ; M/0W69 SN BASS < 0.2 0.54 1 0.M < 0.009 0.027 1 0.003
+
OW31/09 SM BASS C t.3 0.29 1 0.05 C 0.02 0.024 1 0.003 ; 10/09/89 SN BASS (1) . 1 MEAN < 0.2 0.36 1 0.26 C 0.013 0.020 1 0.015 l DOTTOM FEEDER M/13/69 BULLHEADS C 0.7 0.71 1 0.07 c 0.M 0.035 1 0.004 06/0W69 CATFISH 3 13 0.6 1 0.2 0.M t 0.05 0.013 1 0.004 09/07/69 CATFISH < 0.2 0.3 1 0.1 < 0.01 0.014 1 0.007 ; I V 09/09 CATFISH < 0.2 0.07 1 0.07 C 0.01 0.0M 1 0.0M MEAH 1.0 t 2,7 Os4% 1 0.56 0.03 1 0.05 0.016 2 0.026 NEM4 PREDATOR 0.69 1 3.62 0.42 2 9.47 0.034 1 0.116 0.021 1 0.020 Mt#4 DOTTOM FtEDER 0.6 1 1.4 0.53 1 0.55 0.024 1 0.046 0.025 1 0.031 (1) Stt PROGRAM EXCEPT!ats SECTION FOR EXPLM4ATION I' 1 ,- l .
__ _ . _ . _ ~ . .- _ _ __ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . l ! t I TABLt C.!!!.8 CONCDURATICHO 0F 6AP0th EMITTERS 3H FIDH SAMPLtl COLLECTED IN tnt VICINITY OF PEACH DOTTOM ATCMIC PCMER STATION. f edt i
#t9ULTS IH IMITS OF PC1/6 RAM (WET) t t SIGMA -
STAT 10H COLLtCT20H , CODE MEDIA DATE Bt.7 K.40 Poh54 CO.56 f t.59 I 1tt BOTTOM FttDER 04/10.M/t t < 0.1 3.6 1 0.3 c 0.01 c 0.02 < 0.05 , 05/31 C 0.1 3.5 1 0.3 c 0.01 < 0.01 C o.03 66/06 < 0.09 2.6 2 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 C 0.03 : 10/04 ( 0.2 3.3 1 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.07 I MEAN < 0.12 3.3 1 0.7 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.05 tX DOTTOM FEEDER 64/11 < 0.2 2.3 1 0.5 < 0.02 c 0.02 - t 0.M
- e5/31 < 0.1 3.4 1 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 c 0.03 I 06/15 10/04 HEAH
< 0.07 c 0.2 c 0.14 1.3 2.1 2.3 1 0.2 1 0.3 1 1.7
< 0.006 C 0.01
< 0.012
< 0.009 c 0.02 c 0.015
< 0.02 C 0.06
< 0.M
[ t I 41 PREDATOR 04/07. M/13 06/06 06/06
< 0.07
- 0.1 4 0.7 2.6 4.4 2.7 1 0.2 1 0.4 2 0.3
< 0.006 C 0.01 c 0.02 *
< 0.009
< 0.01
< 0.05 C 0.03
< 0.04 C 0.3 10/10 < 0.1 2.6 2 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.05 ;
MEAN < 0.24 3.1
- t.7, t 0.012 < 0.0t0 < 0.11 DOTTOM FttDER M/11 < 0.2 4.1 1 0.4 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.M 06/06 06/20 < 0.09 3.2 1 0.3 < 0.009 c 0.01 < 0.03 06/06 < 0.2 2.6 2 0.3 C 0.01 < 0.02 C 0.06 10/16 c 0.2 3.6 2 0.3 c 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.04 t
MEAN < 0.17 3.5 t 1.2 - < 0.010 .* 0.02 < 0.05 i I 4J PREDATOR M/07 06/06 06/06 C 0.2 C 0.07 C 0.1 2.7 1.5 3.0 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.3
< 0.01 c 0.007 C 0.01
< 0.01 c 0.006 C 0.01
< 0.04 C 0.02 C 0.03 ,
10/10 < 0.2 4.3 t 0.4 5 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.07 MEAN < 0.14 2.9 1 2.3 < 0.009 C 0.012' < 0. M DOTTOM FEEDER M/t 1 C 0.1 3.3 2 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03 } I 06/06 0.1 1 0.1 3.4 2 0.3 C 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.04 - 06/06 < 0.1 3.3 1 0.3 C 0.01- < 0.01 < 0.04 10/10 < 0.1 1.2 2 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.05 , MEAN 0.1 1 0.0 2.6 1 2.1 < 0. M '
< 0.01 < 0.01 6 PREDATOR M/13 < 0.009 < 0.01 < 0. M .
06/06 C 0.1 t.9 1 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.02 C 0.05- ' 06/31 c 0.07 2.1 1 0.2 C 0.006 C 0.006 < 0.02 10/09 c 0.2 3.6 1 0.3 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.06 MEAN c 0.12 t.9 1 1.7 < 0.009 < 0.015 C 0.M I DOTTD1 fttDER 64/13 C 0.1 3.7 1 0.3 C 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.03 i I 06/06 09/07 10/09 C 0.1 c 0.1 C 0.2 2.3 3.3 2.0 2 0.3 1 0.3 1 0.3 C 0.01 C 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.01-c 0.02
< 0.02
< 0. M
< 0.0$
< 0.06 l l
MEAH < 0.1 2.6 1 1.6 < 0.01 < 0,02 < 0.05 (I MEAN PREDATOR 90TTOM FttDER
< 0.17 0.13 1 0.10 2.9 3.0 1 1.6 1 1.6 C 0.010
< 0.010
< 0.015
< 0.014 C 0.06
< 0.05 j
1 I I I J s . - _ -_ , _ . _ _ , -, , . _. . _. _ - _ - _ . _ _ _ ,
l , TABLE C.!!!.t CD4CtHTRAT10HS OF GAP 9tA EMITTERS DJ FISH SAMPLtt COLLECTED Di THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTON ATOMIC POWER STATIGH.1969 ptsVLTS D4 LHITt OF PC1/9 RAM (WET) 1 2 91GMA i STATION COLLLCTIG1 C00t Mt01A PER100 CO.60 D4-65 + 95 RU.1 M AG-110M 1tt BOTTOM fit 0ER M/10.M/11 < 0.0t c 0.03 c 0.03 < 0.1 < 0.02 < 05/31 C 0.01 c 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.01 i 0V06 < 0.01 < 0.03 c 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.01 j 10/M 0.01 1 0.01 c 0.03 c 0.M c 0.1 t 0.02 j MEAN 0.01 1 0.00 < 0.03 c 0.03 < 0.1 < 0.02 IX BOTTOM ftt0ER 94/11 c 0.02 < 0.05 c 0.03 c 0.2 < 0.03 ! 05/31 < 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.01 ! 06/15 < 0.009 c 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.09 < 0.01 : 10/04 < 0.01 < 0.03 c 0.03 ( 0.1 < 0.02 j MEAN < 0.012 < 0.03 < 0.02 < 0.12 C'0.02 l 4! PRt0ATOR 64/07 04/13 06/06 4 0.009 C 0.01 c 0.02
< 0.03 c 0.01
< 0.02
< 0.09 c 0.1
< 0.01
< 0.02 lr[,
08/06 < 0.01 < 0.04 C 0.3 c 0.2 < 0.02 - , 10/10 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 C 0.1 < 0.01 ; MEN 4 c 0.010 c 0.03 < 0.09 C 0.12
- 0.02 l DOTTOM FtEDER M/11 C 0.02 < 0.M c 0.03 < 0,2 c 0.02 ,
06/06 06/20 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.01 06/06 C 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.03 ( 0.1 < 0.02 , 10/16 C 0.01 c 0.03 c 0.03 C 0.1 0.02~t 0.02 , Mt.AH c 0.01 < 0.03 C 0.03 < 0.1 0.02 1 0.01 4J PREDATOR 04/07 C 0.01 < 0.03 c 0.02 C 0.1 c 0.02 06/06 C 0.006 C 0.02 c 0.01 < 0.06 < 0.01 06/06 C 0.01 < 0.02 c 0.02 < 0.1 c 0.01 10/10 c 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.2 C 0.02 NEAN < 0.010 c 0.03 < 0.02 ' C 0.12 < 0.02 l DOTTOM ftt0ER M/11 < 0.01 c 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.01
'I 06/06 c 0.01 < 0.03 C 0.02 c 0.1 , < 0.02 '
06/06 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.02 < 0.1 C 0.01 10/10 < 0.01 4 0.03 0.03 1 0.03 < 0.1 < 0.01 i MEAN < 0.01 < 0.03 0.02 2 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.01 6 PREDATOR 04/13 C 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.02 0.1 1 0.1 < 0.01 . 06/06 C 0.01 < 0.03 c 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.02 06/31 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.01 < 0.06 < 0.01 10/09 ( 0.01 0.03 2 0.03 < 0.03 C 0.1 < 0.02 0.03 1 0.01 MEAN < 0.01 < 0.02 0.10 1 0.02 < 0.02 BOTTOM ftt0ER M/13 < 0.01 < 0.02- C 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.01 06/06 < 0.01 < 0.02 C 0.02 < 0.1 C 0.01 - 3 09/07 C 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.03 C 0.1 c 0.02 - 10/09 < 0.01 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.1 < 0.02 NEAN < 0.01 < 0.03 C 0.02 < 0.1 < 0.02 MEAN PRE 0ATOR' BOTTOM ftt0ER
< 0.10 0.011 1 0.006 0.03 1 0.01 C 0.03
< 0.04 0.02 2 0.02
. 0.11 1 0.06 C 0.11 C 0.02 0.02 1 0.01 I
i i
.i b ll
o I I TABLE C.III.t CCHCtHTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FISH SAMPLE $ COLLECTt0 IN THE VICINITT OF PEACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATICH 1969 Rt00LTS IN LHITS OF PCI/ GRAM (WET) t t $10MA I STAT!aH CODE MEDIA COLLECTION PERIOC CS.134 C3 136 CS.137 RA tt6 TH.tt6 I ttt BOTTON FEEDER 04/10 04/11 0.02 1 0.01 < 0.1 0.02 1 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 05/31 < 0.01 < 0.05 0.03 1 0.01 0.04 2 0.02 < 0.03 0S/06 0.02 1 0.01 < 0.03 0.06 2 0.01 0.02 t 0.02 0 M t 0.03 10/04 < 0.01 < 0.4 0.03 1 0.01 < 0.02 0.05 1 0.03 MEAN 0.02 1 0.01 < 0.15 0.M i 0.03 0.03 1 0.02 ~ 0.M 1 0.02-1X 00TTOM FEEDER M/t 1 < 0.02 < 0.09 < 0.0t < 0.03 0.06 1 0.H 05/31 0.01' t 0.01 < 0.05 0.04 1 0.01 I
< 0.02 0.H t 0.03 06/15 C 0.006 C 0.02 0.01t t 0.000 0.03 1 0.02 < 0.02 ,3 10/04 < 0.Sl C 0.3 C 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 NEAH 0.012 1 0.011 < 0.12 0.021 1 0.027 0.03 1 0.01 0. M - 1 0.03 41 M/07 04/t 3 < 0.006 < 0. M 0.020 1 0.006 < 0.01 < 0.02-
-I PREDATOR 06/06 < 0.01 -C 0.07 < 0. 01 - 0.M 1 0.02 0.M t 0.M 06/06 C 0.01 < 100 < 0.01 < 0.02 0.06 1 0.M 10/10 < 0.009 < 0.2 < 0.009 C 0.02 < 0.03 MEAN < 0.009 C 25.1 0.012 1 0.010 0.02'1 0.01 0.M 1 0.05 DOTTOM Ptt0ER M/t ) < 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.01 < 0.03 ( 0.M I 06/06 06/20 < 0.009 < 0.06 0.013 1 0.009 C 0.32 < 0.02 OWO6 C 0.01 0.3 1 0.3 0.01 1 0.01 0.03 1 0.02 0.05 2 0.M 10/16 < 0.01 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.02 0.M i 0.M Mf.AH < 0.010 0.17 2 0.22 0.011 1 0.003 0.03 1 0.01 0.M ' t 0.03 4J PREDATOR 04/07 4 0.01 < 0.1 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 06/06 < 0.007 < 0.?4 < 0.007 < 0.01 < 0.02 06/06 C 0.01 < 0.06 ~0.03 1 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 10/10 < 0.01 < 0.3
< 0.01 < 0.02 0.M t 0.04 MEAN < 0.009 < 0.13 0.014 1 0.021 < 0.02 0.03 1 0.02 DOTTCM FEEDER M/11 0.01 1 0.01 < 0. M 0.02 2 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 I
06/06 C 0.01 < 0.06 C 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 06/06 C 0.01 < 0.06 0.02 2 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 10/10 < 0.01 < 0.2 < 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 MEAN 0.01 1 0.00 < 0.09 0.02 1 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 I 6 PREDATOR M/13 06/06 06/31
< 0.009
< 0.01
< 0.006 -
< 0.1
< 0.07
< 0.02 0.011 1 0.009
< 0.01
< 0.006
< 0.02 0.03 1 0.03 0.03 1 0.02 0.05 2 0.M
< 0.02 < 0.02 10/09 < 0.01 < 0.2 I
< 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 MEAH < 0.009 C 0.10 0.010 1 0.003 0.02 1 0.01 0 03 1 0.03 BOTTOM FEEDER M/13 C 0.01 < 0.M 0.01 1 0.01 < 0.02 < 0.03 I M/06 09/07 10/09
< 0.01 C 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.06
< 0.2
< 0.3 0.010 1 0.009 0.03 2 0.02 0.01 1 0.01
< 0.01
< 0.02
< 0.02
< 0.03
< 0.03
< 0.03 FEAN < 0.01 < 0.15 0.010 1 0.000 0.02 1 0.01 I
< 0.03
-i MEAN PREDATOR < 0.009 C 6.4 0.016 1 0.026 0.02 2 0.02 0.M 1 0.03 !
BOTTOM FEEDER t.011 1 0.006 0.13 1 0.23 0.016 1 0.016 0.02 1 0.01 0.03 2 0.02-I I 4 I ! i
_ . . . . . . . . . ~ . . - ~ 4 i l^ TA6Lt C.IV.1 CCHCENTRATIONS OF GDOSS ALPHAe GROSS BETA AND GMt1A EMITTERS D4 301L SAMPLES = i COLLECTED D4 THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC FONER STATION. t969 L l RESULTS IN LHITS OF PCI/ GRAM DRY t t $10MA COLLECTION GPOSS GROSS STATION DATE ALPHA SETA BE.7 K 40 P04 54 CO.60-100 06/13/69 12 25 40 13 < 0.09 16 12 0.02 1 0.01 0.07 1 0.02 10/13/09 - 22 17 46 24 < 0.2 16 12 < 0.2 < 0.2 MEN 4 17 1 14 44 1 11 < 0.15 16 10 0.02 1 0.00 0.05 1 0.07 1X 06/13/69 17 16 46 14 < 0.06 15 '12 < 0.007 0.04 1 0.02 l 10/t V69 29 2 ~7 46 14 < 0.2 19 22 < 0.01 < 0.01 NE44 23 1 17 46 10 < 0.14 17 16 < 0.009 0.03 1 0.04 40 06/13/09 24 17 52 24 1.3 1 0.3 16 22 0.02 1 0.02 0.34 1 0.03 - 10/13/09 14 25 46 13 < 0.2 to 22 < 0.02 < 0.02 NEAH 19 1 14 49 23 0.6 1 1.6 16 10 0.02 't 0.00 0.16 1 0.45-4J 06/13/69 9 25 23 23 < 0.07 9.7 1 1.0 < 0. 006 ' O.10 1 0.01 10/13/69 11 15 24 13 < 0.2 9.5 1 0.9 < 0.01 0.11 t 0.03 MEN 4 10 13 24 11 < 0.14 9.6 1 0.3 < 0.006 0.11 1 0.01 4T 06/13/69 15 16 53 14 C 0.1 20 t2 0.03 1 0.02 < 0.01 10/t V69 25 27 56 24 < 0.3 20 tt c 0.02 < 0.02 i NE#4 20 t 14 55 14 < 0.2 20 10 0.03 1 0.01 < 0.02 . 6P 06/13/69 13 15 52 14 t.1 2 0.2 17 12 < 0.009 < 0.009 10/13/69 9 24 31 23 < 0.3 it 21 < 0.02 < 0.02 MEAN 11 t6 42 2 30 1.2 1 2.5 15 17 < 0.015 < 0.015 MEM4 ALL STATIONS 17 2 13 43 1 23 0.43 2 1.25 16.2 1 7.5 0.016 1 0.015 0.064 2 0.166 , h L I i Il . l l l > g. 5 I;
.- . - . . . . ~ _ . . . . . - - - - . . . . -- .-. . -. .- .
)
i l i I TABLE C.IV.1 CONCINTRATICHS OF 080S8 ALPHA, 000S8 BETA AND GAP 914 EMITTERS 2H SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITT OF PEACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATICH.1969 6 d RESULTS Di LHITS OF PCI/ GRAM DRY t 2 SleMA' COLLECT 20H . . , STATICH DATE 2H.65 CS.134 CS.137 RA-tt6 TH.tt6 :
....... .......... . .......... ............ ............. ............. ............. .i too 06/13/69 < 0.02 < 0.01 0.32 2 0.03 1.5 1 0.3 0.99 1 0.10 +
10/13/69 < 0. M < 0.02 < 0.02 1. 7 .- 10.6- 1.2 1 0.1 } MEAN < 0.03 < 0.02 0.17 t 0.42 1.6 1 0.3 1.10 1 0.30 [ I 1X 06/13/69 10/13/69
< 0.02
< 0.04
< 0.006
< 0.02 0.22 t 0.02
< 0.02 1.1 2.0
't 0.2 10.6-0.95 't 0.09 0.91 1 0.09 .l NE#4 C 0.03 < 0.015 0.12 1 0.26 1.6 1 1.3 0.93 1 0.06 40 06/13/69 0.06 1 0.03 0.24 1 0.02 1.7 1 0.2 2.1 2 0.3 1.4 2 0.1 10/11/89 C 0.04 < 0.02 0.05 t 0.M 2.1 10.6' 1.3 1 0.1 0.06 1 0.06 0.13 1 0.31 0.66 1 2.33 2.1 2 0.1 I
MEAN t 0.0 1.4 1 10.2' O.50 1 0.05 4J 06/13/69 < 0.01 < 0.007- 0.24 1 0.02 0.9 10/13/69 < 0.04 < 0.02 0.16 1 0.04 0.6 1 0.5 0.54 1 0.05 MEW 4 < 0.03 < 0.014 0.21 2 0.06'O.9 1 0.1 0.52 1 0.06 4T 06/13/69 < 0.03 < 0.01 ' O . 41 . t 0. M t.6 1 C.4 1.5 2 0.1 f 10/13/69 < 0.06 C 0.05 0. M t 0.04 1.6 10.7' 1.6 2 0.2 ' MEAH < 0.05 C 0.02 0.36 1 0.10 2.3 1 1.4- 1,6 1 0.1 6F 06/13/69 < 0.02 < 0.01 0.26 & 0.03 .2.2 1 0.3 1.4 1 0.1 10/13/09 C 0.06 C 0.03 .0.15 1 0.05 'tel '1 0.6 1.3 1 0.1
- MEAN < 0. H < 0.02 0.21 1 0.16 2.3 1 0.1 '~1.4 2 0.1
, _ ALL STAT _S 0.M 2 0.M . 0,. t 0.,,0 0.,3 2 0.90 ,.6 i ,.2 ...,3 2 0.,2 I .
I i
~l .
.I l l l .- , . - . .
-. - . ~ - .- .- .- . _ .
I; TABLE C.V.1 CG4CtHTRATICHS OF GROSS BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLtt l COLLECTt0 IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATCMIC POWER STATICHe 1969 RESULTS IN 1MITS OF E.3 PCI/CU. METER t 2 SIGNA GROUP I . CH. SITE LOCATICHS WttK 1A to 2 1 32 12 to .tt 11 1 12 i t 30 23 22 tt 23 22 ' 3 23 - 12 25 't t 23 12 l 4 32 13 33 13 32 13 5- 30 tt 26- 12 29 12 ' 6 26 12 25 12 27 22 7 26 23 24 13 24 22 8 26 12 27 12 23 12 9 to 12 30 tt to 12 10 to 22 21 22 19 22 h; 11 12 25 20 tt tt 24 20 22 t2 ft 17 t2 22 g*
- 13 17 12 16 12- 14 22 14 19 13 to 13 20 23 l 15 23 12 22 t2 17 22 16 15 13 25 23 23 12 t 17 to tt to i2 17- 12 to 17 12 14 22 14 11 19 15 12 13 12 It 22 to 19 22 19 22 19 22 21 21 1t 20 12 26 23 22 26 22 .it tt 23 12 23 16 12 16 12 15 tt 24 19 22 17 12 16 22 25 20 t2 16 12 19 22 26 19 12 19- t2 20 tt 27 16 12 16' tt to- tt to 21 13 22 tt 25 13
- 29 20 t2 16 12 16 12 30 21 23 22 tt 23 22 31 22 22 23 12 24 22 37, 20 tt 23 12 19 12 33 22 12 22 12 23 12 .
34 20 12 22 22 22 tt , 35 to 14 27 13. to 14 36 21 12 21 22 21 .tt i 37 29 22 25 13- 27 12 l 36 11.0 1 1.0 13 12 12 22 : 39 25 23 to 22 25 12 i' 40 20 t2 17 22 20 13 41 21 12 24 23 't6 13 42 27 22 30 tt 31 12 43 29 13 33 13 34 13 I 44 30 12 35 12 32 22 45 to 13 29 13 26 23 46 26 t3 23 2t 26 13 47 46 24 23 12 12 21 25 22 12 23 (1) 12 l1 g'< 49 24 12 23 12 23 12 50 37 13 34 12 31 22 51 32 13 35 23 36 13 52 22 tt 22 tt 20 22 MEAN 23.4 1 10.2 23 2 11 23 1 11
- 11) Stt PROGRAM EXCEPTICHS SECTION FOR EXPLAHATION
- I I.:t >
4: Iy
TABLE C.V.1 CCHCENTRATIQHS OF 480S$ BETA IN AIR PART2WLATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATUMIC POWER STATION 1989 RESULTS IN LHITS OF E.3 PCI/CU. MtTER 2 2 SleMA 6NOUP II . INTERMEDIATE DISTANCE LOCAT!aHS WttK 3A 46 5 6B 14 15 I' ...... ............. . ........... ............. ............. ............. ............. t t 19 it 12 tt 21 1Il tt 30 20 t2 13 31 22 13 t1 32; 23
*3" 12 29 24 12-23 3 24 12 Et tt it tt 2 2 -- 12 23- t2 25 t3 4 34 .23 33 13 32 12 33 13 33 13 26 - 12 5' 26 12 27 22 26 12 3I 13 33- 13 29 13 6 - 26 12 29 12 25 12 29 2.3 27 12 25 12 7 27 13 25 23 23- 12 22 *t ?6 12 23 13 6 24 12 27 12 24 13 26 12 t e' tt 24 *t 9 32 13 26 22 30 tt 30 tt 27 12 26 1*
10 22 tt 21 22 14 12 25 12 21 1t' 20 tt 11 22 1t 24 22 22 1t 26. 12 26 ~ 12 23 12 12 17 12 17 12 16 tt 22 tt 23 12 20 tt I 13 15 12 to 12 13 12 13- t2 14 22 14 22 14 17 13 26 24 to 12 20 23 16 12 16 13 15 20 12 21 1t- 21 t2 22 13 2 2 -- 2.2 21 12 16 24 13 26 23 to 12 21 1t 21 12 30 - t3 17 17 12 to 12 19 22 22 12 21 tt 22 22 to 14 22 14 12 14 22 14 = 12 15 12 13- 12 19 13 12 15 tt 13 12 14 12 14. 12 15 tt 20 to 22 to 12 17- t2 17 *2 .16 12 16 22 21 20 tt 14 12. 23 23 21 12 20 tt =19 12 22 to 12 21 tt 22. tt 23 1 t- 22 tt 19 it 23 16 22 14 12 16 12 19- t2 17 12- 16 12 24 19 22 ti 12 to te 16 12 16- 12 16 12 25 to 12 20 tt 15 tt 17 22 15 12 15 tt 26 to 12 16 12 16 12 tt- tt . 20 . 2 2. 22 1 2-27 19 22 20 12 17 12 17 12 21 12 19 12 I. to 29 30 24 20 Et 13 tt tt 25 to 25 13 tt tt to 15 25 12 tt 12 22 16 23 12 13 12 21 16-25' t t-12 13 17 17 23 12 23-12 ' 31 to 13 22 12 26 22 23 12 22 1t 20. 12 I 32 20 12 21 22 17 22 to 12 19 22 to 12 1 33 22 2t 22 22 17 t1 17 22 17 22 '16 12 34 20 tt 19 12 24 23 26 23 24 23 26s 13 l 35 27 13 27 13 23 12 26 13 22' tt 23 12 { 36 22 1t 25 12 21 1t- 20 tt .23 12 20 tt i 37 26 12 26 22 24 13 24 23 22 1t 22. tt 36 12 12 14 22 14 12 14 A t- 15 2* 13 12 ~ 39 to it 22 t2 to = *t 20; *2 17 12 16 12 40 16 12 111 to 12 20 tt 21 12 17 22 I 41 42 43 44 30 26 31 31 23 12 13 12 24 29 29 35 12 22 13 12 24 to 30 29 22 12 tt 12 25 30 30 32 22 tt 13 12 24 25 30 32 ' 12
-t3 tt 12 26 29' 32 31 12 tt 23 12 45 to 23 26 13 to 13 33 13 to *3 30 13 46 27 13 26 13 24 12 15 tt 24 12 21 tt 47 22 tt 23 12 22 tt 24 ' 12 26 12 22. 12 46 23 12 22 1t 21 12 22 tt 24 12 21 12 49 24 f2 21 12 19 22 to 12 22 tt 24 13
.I 50 33 23 30 12 30 t2 31 12 32 22 30 tt 51 36 13 34 13 35 13 34 23 39 13 50 14 l 52 22 tt 21 12 20 12 22 tt 22 tt 22 tt I MEAN 23 1 11 23 1 10 22 .1 10 23 1 11 23 1 11 22 'i 13 lI til SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLAHATICH I , r I
I :) ll' CO CT TH V IHIT PEAC T C POWE STAT 20H 1969 RESULTS 2H LNITS OF E.3 PCZ/QJ. METER 12 SIGPtA GROUP II . 3HTENMED1ATC OISTAHCE LOCAT20HS GROUP III . CONTROL LOCAT!aHS WEEK 17 31 32 3 56 36 120 1 26 1 t~ 30 12 26 12 32 23 33 13 16 22 2 ti it 20 12 22 2t 22 tt 23 12 16 12 . 3 22- 12 23 12 24 1 t- 23 13 23 22 22 22
- 4 34 13 30 tt 26 23 30 tt 31 12 25 12 5 to 12 27 *2 27 23 29 12 30 t2 19' tt L 6 27 12 26 22 to -22 27 12 31 22 tl 12 ;
7 25 13 24 13 21 12 24 12 . 26 - t3 20 't2 - 6 24 22 24 22 30 23 to it 24 13 to 22 ; 9 13 it tt 2t 13 12
~
33 to 20 27 25 19 10 19 12 21 12 20 t2 19 12 21 12 17 12 ! 11 23 22 25 tt 25 tt 23 12 23 12 14 12 12 19 12 29 13 22 tt 20 tt 22 t2 13 12 13 13 12 14 12 to 12 14 12. 16 12 11 12 ; 14 16 12 16 12 ft) 17 13 17 22 11 12 i 15 20 tt 22 12 25 13 22 tt 21 tt 20 t2 16 21 12 23 12 20 tt 21 23 21 1t 4 25 t2 17 21 tt 19 11 19 12 20 tt 23 12 11 1 2" to 15 22 13 12 14 22 15 12 13.0 1 1.0 10 12 19 11 12 13 12 it tt 13 12 13 12 9 1e i to 19 12 to 12 16 11 19 12 19 12 14 1 t' El 20 tt 20 t2 12 12 t2 16 19 20 13 22 -t 22 20 tt it tt 21 tt 22 tt 25 12 19 22 23 19 12 16 12 17 12 19 22 20 tt 14 12 24 13 12 to 22 15 12 17 22 17 12 11 22 ' 25 16 12 to 12 15 12 16 22 16 22 13 12 26 to 22 16 12 19 22 22 12 19 22- 14 12 27 19 12 19 12 19 12 20 tt to 12 15 12 to 21 12 22 12 21 12 21' tt 21 22 13 12 29 17 22 15 t2~ 17 12 16 12 14 1 t- 12 12. ' 30 23 12 23 13 tt tt 23 12 25 tt 17 12-12 22 31 21 24 26 22 23 12 21 12 17 .*t 32 17 12 16 22 20 tt 17 *t 17 22 to tt 'l 33 17 22 16 -12 17 12 15 12 17 22 13 tt 34 25- 23 23 ' 25 25 13 22 23 23 ' 13 16 22 35 24 22 27 23 23 12 26 13 26 12 17 22 > l 36 21 22 to tt 21 12 to 12 22' tt 19 12 - 37 21 *2 21 12 22 2t 21 23 25 23 11 -t2 i 36 13 12 12 12 15 12 16 12 14 -t2 -6.0 1 1.0 39 17 22 24 12 16 12 15 12 16 't2 16 22 40 21 1t to 12 19 13 21 1t 21 1 2- 13 12 i 41 to 12 23 22 24 12 23 22 25 12 29 13 42 25 12 27 12 27 12 26 tt 27 12 12 12 43 34 13 31 22 33- 23 33 23 26 - 12 32 13' , l-44 29 12 29 22 30 tt 30 t2 31 22 22 tt 45 31 23 29 23 27 13 21 2t 33' t3 21 1t 46 24 22 26 13 24 22 26 13 26 13 19 12 47 23 12 21 12 23 *t (1) 25 12 15 12 46 23 12 21 1t 23 12 til 21 12 16 12 49 23 1e 22 13 24 13 11) 22 'tt 15 12 50 29 12 30 t2 31 22 31 12 30 tt' 26 22 51 37 13 36 23' 36 13 24 22 40 13 21 tt
)
52 21 tt 21 12 19 22 20 12 22 12 15 12 r NEAM tt t 11 22 1 10 22 1 to 22 1 10 22.6 1 11.2 16.4 2 10.3 I 111 StE PROGRAM EXCEPTIOtt SECTICH POR EXPLANATIO4 ! E
& & & & & 8 .. ... J. : & .. .
M & & & TABLE C-V.2 MONTMLY NG YEAFLY MEM4 VALUES OF G80S$ SETA (XD4CDM9ATIONS (E-3 PCI/UJ. METEWS De AIR PARTICUt. ATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN TME VICD417Y OF PEAOf 80TTOPt ATiptIC POMER STATIG4, 1989
)
GSOUP I GWOUP II es0UP III COLLECTIG4 COLLECTIG4 COLLECTRN PERICO MDf. MEX. MEAN 1 2 SS PERIOS MD4 PeU(. MEAN i 2 SS PERIOS MD4 teLX. MEN 41 2 SS 12/31/88-92/04/8? 22 33 28 i6 12/31/88-92/9U S9 29 34 26 19 91/93/89-91/30/89 18 25 21 17 92/8U89-92/25/89 23 27 25 23 91/28/89-92/25/89 21 33 26 25 01/34 4 9-92/27/89 18 21 29 13 02/25/89-04/02/89 14 30 21 19 92/25/89-94/92/89 13 33 22 1 te 92/27/89-94/9F89 ft 19 15 14 94/92/89-04/30/89 17 25 21 16 94/92/89-94/30/89 16 39 21 15 94/95/89-95/92/89 11 25 17 1 14 94/30/89-46/0V89 12 26 19 19 94/29/89-96/9U59 11 25 17 17 95/02/89-95/30/89 9 14 12 15 96/0U89-97/9t/89 15 29 18 13 96/94/69-97/91/89 13 22 '18 24 95/3e/89-97/9F89 19 19 33 - i7 07/9t/89-07/29/89 16 25 29 i6 97/91/09-07/29/89 14 25 29 i6 97/93A!B9-07/31/89 12 17 14 14 07/29/89-99/91/89 19 28 23 16 07/29/89-99/91/89 15 27 21 17 97/31/89-08/28/89 19 17 14 16 12 26 .19 18 98/28/89-10/92/89 8 19 14 9 99/91/89-99/3e/89 11 29 21 i 12 99/91/89-99/30/89 99/30/89-1e/27/89 17 34 26 i 11- 09/30/09-10/28/89 17 34 26 i9 10/92/89-10/30/89 12 32 22 1 21 t e/27/89-12/03/89 21 35 27 i8 t e/27/89-12/9F89 21 35 26 i8 89/38/89-11/27/89 15 22 19 24 12/03/89-12/29/89 29 38 28 2 13 12/03/89-12/30/89 18 59 28 1 14 11/27/89-91/02/90- 15 to 19 1 19 12/38/88-t 2/29/89 11 38 23 1 11 12/31/88-12/38/89 11 59 22 1 19 91/93/89-9t/92/90 8 32 16 i t9 teyTE e 6800P 1 COMSISTS OF STATIUMS 1A,18, 2 GDOUP II CONSISTS OF STATIONS 3Ac 46, 5, 48,14,16,17, 31, em 38 GROUP III (XD8SISTS OF STATIG4129 b* m:.c m_m- .m.- .
~ TABLE C.V.3 CCHCtHTRATIm45 0F GM914 EMITTEtE IN AIR PARTIQJLATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC PCNER STAT 20Hr 1969 PESULTS IH t&4ITS OF E-3 FCI/CU. METER = 1 1 SIeMA GROUP 1 .~ SITE LOCATIONS STATIcti COLLECTIGH CODE PERIOD 6t.7 _. K.40 ' -CS.134 CS.137- RA.S t 6 ' TH.tto . ,
1A . JM4 69 190 t 90 < 200 <6 <6 < 10 - < 20 FE6 69 90 . 1 60- 200 - 1 100 < 5' -C5 <9- < 10 MAR 69 160 1 60 200 1 100. < 4 -<5' <9 < 10 - APR 69 200- 1.90 < 100' <6 <6 < 10 ' MAT 69 -130 t 60 . < 100
' < 20- L
< 5 -<5"' '< 10 < 10 9 JUH 89 70 . t 70 -< 100 <5 ,<5 < 10 < 10 '
k, JUL 69 100 t 60 -< 100 < 6- < 7- < 10 : C 20 AUG 69- 140 1 60 - < 100 s< 5 C5- <9 C 10. SEP 69 110 1.60 < 100 <5 <6 < 10 < to
' OCT 6 9 - 110-' 1 60 100 .i 100 < 4- C 5. <7 < 10-HOV 89 90 1 70 < 100- C4 < 5; DEC 69 90 2 60 < 200 -<6c <6
-c 6 C 10 -
- < - 10 9
< 20-MEAN- 123 - t 63 133' i 90 < 5' C6 _C 9 3.14.
16 JM4 69 150 1 90 < 130 C7 .C5 .< 10' < 20-FE6 69 110 2 60 < 100 <5 <4 C6 < 10 MAR 69 60- t 70 100 1 100 < 4- C 5.:, <9 < 10 APR 69- 110- t 60 300 1 100 <5 -c5' <9- < 10 MAY 69 < 90 < 100 <6 ~<6 C 10 JLkt 69 < 20 ' 150 1 70 < 100 C5 <4 < 10 .< 10 ' JUL 69 120 2 60
< 200 C6 C 7: -< 10 < 20 - ,
AUG 69 160 1 60 200 t 200 <6 < 10
.c 6 - < 20 -
SEP 69 110 1 60 200 2 100 <4 C 4' < 9 -- < 10 ' OCT 69 ,130 1 60 < 100 <4 C5 C9 < 10 - ) NOV 69 ~110 2 60 100 -1 100 <4' <4: ' C. 6 <<10 - - ' DEC 69 120 2 90
-< 200 C6 <7 < 10 < 20-MEAH 120: 1 46 167 -1 130 <5 <5 ,c9 < 14 "i 2 JM4 69 100 1 100 < 100 <6 ' < 10 FE6 69
'< 6 < 20 60 2 70 < 200 : <6 .. <6 < 10 '< MAR 69 120 t.90 < 100 <4 <4 -C6.
48R 69 .< 10 120 1 90 C.100 <6 C6 10 1.10 < 20 - P 69 90' 2 60 200 2 100 C6 .<6 <9 < 20 J169 150 t 70 < 100 <4 C4-JUL 69 < 101 < 10 . 110 2 60 200 -t 100 C5 C5- < 10 < 10 :. AUG 69 < 60 ' 200. 2 100 <5 C 6 SEP 69 100 2 60
<0 < 10- '
. < 100 <6 <6 < 10 < to OCT 69 140 2 60 200 t 100 <4 <5- C6- < 9-HOV 89 100 1 100 < 103 <6 6 17' DEC 69 10 , t 10 < 10 f 110 1 90 < 200 C6- <7 . c 10 < 20 !!
MEAH 107 1 49 150 1 104 <5 6 22 '! 9 12 < 14 1 MEAH GROUP I i 117 1 62 150 1 112 < 5 '5 12 9 1 2. < 14 !_ { fl l J l L g a 4 a i
I - I TABLE C.Y'.3 COHCENTRATIGHS OF GM9th EMITTERS D4 AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED D4 - THE. VICINITY OF PEACH DOTTCet ATOMIC POWER STATICHe 1969 PESULTS IN Ik(ITS OF E.3 PCI/QJ. METER = 1' 2 SIONA - i GROUP II = DfTERMEDIATE DISTM(T LOCATICHS ~ STAT 20H COLLECTION K.40 CS.137 I CODE PERIOD -St.7 CS.134 RA.226 . TH.226 - 3A JMt 69 160 1 60 300- 2 100 . <5 <6 <9 < 10 FE6 69 220 1 70 -< 100- <5' <5 ' <9. < 10 - MAR 69 -90 1 60 < 1001- --C 4' <4 ~ <6' < 10 I APR 69 110 ' t 90 < 200 -C6 . < 6. < 10 < 20 - MAY 69 110 2 60 3001 1 100 <5 <5 < 10 - < 10
' M4 69 190 1 70 200-- 1 -100 <5 <5 C9 < 10
- JUL 69 120 1 70 < 200 'C6 C6 < 10 < 20 AUG 69 90 1 70. < 200' <6 <7 C 10 < 20 SEP 69' 140 1 60 200- 1 100 <5 '<4: C 9, < 10
*- OCT 69 160 1 60 <'100 C5 C4 < 10' < 10 HW 69 130 2 90 . < 100 <4' c.4 <6-' < 10 DEC 69 < 60 < 200 <6 <6 < 10. < 20- +
MEAH 135 2 661 163' t 144 <5' <5 .'< 9 l < 13 - , 46 J#4 69 190 -1 60 200 ' t 100 . <6- <7 < 10 < 10- , FE6 69 160 2 60 < 100 .c 5 C5 .'< 10 < 10 - , I MAR 69 APR 69-MAY 69 M4 69 140. t 70 200 1 100 120 1 60 - 110 t 70
< 100
< 200
< 100.
< 100
<5
-< 7
<4
<4J
<5
<7 C4
<5 C.10 '
- < 10 '
C6
< 10 ..
-C'10
< 20
< 10
< 10 -.
I t JUL 69 140 1 70 200 1 100 C5- < 10 ' < 10 .g c5 5 I. AUG 69 SEP 69 OCT 69 150 1 70. 90 110 2 60 2 60 400 t 200 c.160 ,
.< 100-
<5-C6 C5
'<6~
< 6'
<9
' c 10 -
< 10
. .c to
< 20
- < 20 :
HOV 89 170 1 60 120 t 90 <4 <3 -<6' < 10-- DEC 69, 100 2 90 < 200- C7 < < 10' < 201 MEM4 140 1 71 160 1 176 '<5 C5- < 9- < 13 JMi 69 JI
$ < 60 < 100 <6- C5 < 10 < 10 ;
FE6 69 150 1 70 100 1 100 .<4 <5 <-9 < 20- ' MAR 69 170 t 60 < 100 <4 -<4 C6 - < 10 APR 69 200 1 100 < 200 <6 . <7 < 10 ~ < 20 ' MAY 69 110 2 70 100 2 100 <5 C5 <6 C 10 M4 69 100 2 60 < 100 -<4- C 4: C6- < 10 r JUL 69 100 1 70 200 1 100 < 5' <5 C9 - < 10 ' AUG 69 C 60 300 t 200 C6 < 6- c.10 < 20 SEP 69 190 1 60 200 2 100 <5 <5 <9 < 10 OCT 69 100 1 60 < 100 <5 <5 .<9 < 10 m NOV 69 150 1 70 < 100 <5 <5 '<9 < 10 i DEC 69- 140 1 90 < 200 <6 C6 < 10 C 20 >; MEMI 136 2 65 150 2 135 <5 <5 C9 < 13 \ 66 JM4 69 170 1 60 200 1 100 <5 C5- <9 . < 10 FE6 89 150 2 60 < 200 <6 <5 < 10 < 20 l t
. MAR 69 170 2 60 < 100 <5 <5. < 10 < 10 APR 69- 140 2 90 400 2 200 <5 C6 < 10 < 20 NAY 69 140 1 60 < 200 <6 <6 'C 10 c to M4 69
.I- JUL 69 AUG 69 140 ' t 60 170 1 70 100 1 60 100 1 100 300 1 100 200 1 100
<4
<5
<5
<4
<5
<6
<6
<9 C 10:
- <:9
< 10 C 10 SEP 69 < 60 200 2 100 <5 <5- < 10 < 10 I OCT 69 HOY 69 DEC 69 110 2 50 90 130 1 60 2 60
< 90
< 100
< 200
<4
<4
<6 C4
<5^
<6
<6
< 9-
< 10
< ' 10 -
< 10
< 10 q
i MEAH 133 1 63~ 191 2 to2 <5 <5 C9 < 12 M l l' . i l l I
- . n_ - -
A TABLE C.V.3. CCHC2HTRATIONS OF GAPttA EMITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED D4 THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATCD11C MMER STATICH,1969 RESULTS IH t&4ITS OF 2 3 PCI/CU. METER 1 2 SIGMA - GROUP II DREAMEDIATE DIST## LD3TIONS . STATICH COLLECTICH CODE. PERIOD BE.7 K.40 CS.134 CS.137 RA.226 . TN.226 _. p 14 JAN 09 90 ~ 1 Ob 200 1 100 C5 < 5 .<6 C la i e
< 100 <6 ' ' < 10 FE6 69 200 2 60 < f MAR 69 130 2 70 200 1 100 <5 -% <6 < 19 l APR 69. 160 2 60 200 1 100 C5 *t c 10 < 10 - '
MAY 69 60 1 60 < 200 -<6 C; < 10 < 10
#14 69 60 1 60 ' < 100 <5 C4 <9 < 10 t JUL 69 160 1 70 ' < 200.- C6' 'C6 C 10 < 10 L !
AUG 69 120 2 70 .c 100 C5- C6 < 10 < 10 ' ! SEP 69 70 2 60 < 100 <6 <6 C 10 < 10 3 t' OCT 69 100 1 60 < 90 <4 <5 C7 '< 10 - tW 69 110- t 70 < 100 <4 C5 C6 < 10- 1 t DEC 69 < 60 < 200 <6 <6' < 10 C 20 - MEAN 115 & 90 149 1 106- <5 <5 <9 C 11 15 JAH 69 120 1 90 < 100 < 6-' <6 < 10 < 20 fee 69 110 2 60 < 100 -<6 <7 C 10 < 20 - MAR 69 90 t 60 . < 100 C4 < 4 <7 1<9 -- APR 69 120 2 60 200 1 100 C5 C6 < 10 < 10c
='
MAY 69 140 1 70 < 100 <5 C5 '<9 < 10 JLki 69 130 1 60 200 t'100 <4 <4~ <7 C 10 - JUL 69 130 2 60 . < 100 <6 .c6. < 10 -.C 20 AUG 69 130 1 70 200 2 100 <5 ( 6 c9 . < 10 > SEP 69 < 60 < 100 C5 < 5. '< 10 20 ~ t 20 OCT 69 110 2 60 ' < 100 . <5 C4 <9 < 10 . . I HOP / 69 110 2 70 < 100 <4 <5 C6 ~ < 10 DEC 69 160 1 90 < 100 <6 <7 C 10 < 20 ll NEAN 121 1 51 125 1 90 <5 <5 ~<'9' 14' t'10. - " $ 17 JAH 69 150 2 90 < 200 <5 <6 < 10 < 20! FEB 69 140 2 60 300 1 100- <5 < 5 <6 < 10 MAR 69 170 1 70 200 t'100- <4- C5 <6 - < 10 ~ APR 69 100 1 90 < 100 <6 . C6 < 10 < 20 ' MAY 69 200 1 100 < 200 <6 ' C6 < 20 < 20 JJi69 60 2 60 < 100 <5 <5- <9 < 10 JUL 69 160 1 60 300 1 100 <5 C5 <9 < 10 - ' AUG 69 140 2 80 200 1 200 <6 <6 < 10 < 20 SEP 69 140 1 70 -< 100 < 6' C6 < 10 < 20. OCT 69 60 1 50' 200 1-100 <4 <4 C6 < 10 HOV 69 100 t 60 < 100 <4 <4' <9 < 10 l DEC 69 < 90 < 200- <6 C6 < 10 ' C 20 NEAH 129 2 66 163 1 144 <5 <6 < 10 < 15 31 JAN 69 120 1 60 200 1 100 <5 <5 <9 < 10 FEB 69 150 1 70 < 100 <5 <7 < 10 ' < 20 MAR 69 90 2 70 < 100 C4 <5 C9 < 10 APR 69 100 2 100 < 200 C6 <7 20 2 10 < F0 MAY 69 < 90 < 100 <6 <6 < 10 -C 20 -! JJi69 140 1 70 < 100 <4 <5 <6 C 10 JUL 69 140 1 70 < 100 <5 <5 C 10' -. < 10 AUG 69 110 1 70 < 200 <6 <6 < 10 < 10 SEP 69 100 t 60 200' t 100 <5 <5 <6 < 10 OCT 69 130 2 60 < 90 <4 <4 6 2 .7 <9 HDV 89 110 1 70 < 100- <4 <4 10 16 4 10 DEC 69 < 60 < 100 <6 C6 < 10 < 20 j MEMI 113 1 45 133 2 100 C5 <5 10 26 < 13 i
TABLE C.V.3. CCHCtHTRATICHS OF Β EMITTEPS D4 AIR PANTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED D1 [~ THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION,1969
'4 RESULTS Ri LHITS OF E.3 PCI/CU. METER ' t ' t SIGMA ,
i GROUP II . DNERMEDIATE DISTMN LOCATIG48 ' STATION CX)LLECTIGl
.s CODE- PERIOD 6t.7 K.4 0 . ' CS.134 CS.137 RA.226. ' TH.f t6 -
32 JW469 150 1 90 < 100 <6 C5- < 10 ~< 20 FE6 69 110 1 60' - < 200 C 6 -- <7 C 10 .c to MAR 89 -130 t 60 ~ < 100 ~<5 C6 < 10 < 10 - APR 89 < 100 200 t 200- <9 .C 10 < 20 < 20
< 20 MAY 69- C 60 .c 100 <6 < 61 < 10 Aki69 120 1 60 < 100 <5 <5 <9- < 10 JUL 69- 130- t 60 : 100 1 100 <5- :7 26 <6- .C 10 3 AUG 69 '110 : 1 60 < 100 -<5 C5 C6- < 10 ,
SEP 69- 100 ~ t 60 '200 1 100 <s- <5 <9 < 10 OCT 69 150 . ' t 60 < 100 <5 C4 s< 9 < 10 HOV 89 -100- t 60 100- 1 100' < 4. <3 <6 < 10 - DEC 69 160' 1 60- < 200 <6 <6 < 10- < 10 MEM4 120 2 49- 133 2 96 <6 6 24 < 105 '<.13 33A JM4 69 C 100 < 200- C6 C6- < 10- !< 20. FE6 69 1 100 <5 C5 <9- < 10 I 170 1 70 100 MAR 69 70' t 70 < 100 <5 <4 ' < 10 -< 10 APR 69 100 1 100 < 200 <6 <-7-~ - < 10 - < 2 0 -. MAY 69 130 .t 90 < 100 <6 C6 <:10- C 20 $
# 1 69 120 2 70 < 100 <4 C 5. <9 C 10 JUL 69 100 1 70 < 100' -C6 <7~- C 10- '<^20 AUG 69 60 1 70" 200 t 200 <6 .c6 C 10= < 10 ,
SEP 69 160 2 60 < 100 <6 .C6. < 10 < 20 OCT 69 60 1 50 200 1 100- <3- C4. <6 <9-NOV 69 < 180 < 200 <9 < 9: < 20 - < 20 - I I DEC 69 f1EAN 200 1-100-116 1 St.
< 200' 150 1 104 C7 C6
.C7'
<6
- < 10 C 11 C 20-
. < 16 '
36 JM1 69 200 1 100 < 200 <6 C7 < 10 < 20
< 20
, FE6 69 130 1 70 < 100 <5 <5 'c 9 MAR 89 150 1 70 < 100 <4 <5 <9: < 10: .z APR 69 130 2 60 200' t 100 <5 <4 L<9 < 10 .
MAY 69 100 t 'r 0 200 .1 100 C 4' ,<5 . c 10 C '10 M169 140 t 60 < 100 <4 'C5
~l<9. C 10 JUL 69 140 1 70 - < 100 <5 C5 < 10 .C 10 if AUG 69 130 1 70 200 1 100 <5- C5' < 91 < 10 -
SEP 69 C 70 200 1 100 C4' C5 < 10 -< 10-OCT 69 150 t 60 100 1 100 .<4 C4 C7' < 10 l l J I . HOV 69 DEC 69 MEAN 90 200 2 90 136 2 77 1 60 < 100
< 200 150 1 104
<4
<6
<5-
<5
<6 C5
<9
< 10 -
c9
< 10
< 20
-< 13 I-MEMI GROUP II 127 2 73 155 1 132 <5 5 22 < 10 13 1 10 l
5 I o l l-i I t o
- ~ . . - - - .- - -_. .. -- .-.
I' ;
-i l
TABLE C.V.3 CCHCDffRATIONS OF 64914 EMITTERS D4 AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLt3 COLLECito D4 : i THE VICDf!TY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIDH,1989 RESULTS D4 LA4ITS OF t.1 PCI/CU. METER 1 i SIONA GROUP III . COTTPOL LOCATIONS W STATION COLLECTIO4
' Coot .PERICO 62 7 K.40 CS.134 CS.137 RA.226 - TH.EtB ,
12D JW4 69 150 t 90 < 200 C6 <6 C 10 < 20 FE6 69 -140 1 70 200 1 100 $ 't5 <5 <6 C 10 .i MAR 69 < 60 < 100 <5 C5 C9 C 10 l APR 69 90 ' t 70 100 1 100 <5 C4 C9 C 10- .! MAY 69 130' 2 70 200 1 100 <5 <5 < 10 < 10 3 A4169 1601 60 300 1 100 <4 <4 < 6 < 10 ' JUL 69 'J 4 0 1 60 100 1 100 <5 <5 C6 C 10 ! AUG 69 110 1 60 < 100 <5 C5 < 9' < 10 , SEP 69 -140 2 60 ' 200 i 100 <5 <5 <9 < 10 OCT 69 v40 1 60 < 100 C5
-)
<4 <9 < 10 '
HOV 89 100 1 60 100 1 100 <4 <4 . <6- < 10 DEC 69 110 2 60 <-100 <5 <5 C 10 < 20. ,
.MEAN 124 1 51 150 1 135 5 11 <5 <9 ,< 12 NEAN GROUP III 124 2 51 150 t 135 5 11 <5 < 9 < 12 Ie I'
I. I I-4- s Y
b
- TABLE C-V.4 . ADDITIONAL gar 9th EMITTERS FOLHD B4 AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES
. COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEAOf BOTTW1 ATOMIC ICMER STATICH.1969 RESULTS IN tk4ITS OF E-3 PCI/CU. METER i 2 SIGMA 1
L COLLECTION MJCLIDE PER100 1A- 18 2 3A 48 68 14 17 31 32 ' 33A ' 38 120 CR-51 AUs 89 - - - - - - - - - 80 1 70 .- . - ; - I PO4-54 MAR 89 - 5 15 - - - - . . - - - -- ". . - , l
-[
00-57 JAN 89 - - -. - - - - - - 3 13 - - -> Am 89 - - - - - - 3 i 3 - .- - ' - - - MAY 89 - - 3.13 - '- - - - - - - - - - JLH 89 - - - - - - - - Aus 89
- - - .-: 2 12
- - - '3 13 - - - - - - - - - -
00-60 FEB 89 6 i6 - - - - - - - - - - - - .i 2H-65 JUL 89 - - - 10 i 10 .- - - - - - - - - -
- Aus 89 - - - - - - - - 20120 - - - -
i. zp_95 APR 89 - - - ' '20120' - - -- - - - - - - HDV89 - - - - - - - - - - - 20 1 20 - - te-95 APR 89 - - 10 i'10 - - - - - - -- - - --- Jul 89 9 29 - - -- - - - - - - - - :-- - RU-106 DEC 89 - - -
.-~ - 60160 - .
- - - - - - -1 38-125 JUL 89 -: - - ~ 20 i 10 - -- - - -- - - - -
SEP 89 -- 10 i 10
'.I TE-129M MAR 89 '
- ' ' 200 1 200' - - . :- - - - -
' MAY 89 - '- - --
200 1 200 - - - - .- - - --- - SEP 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - 300 1 300 - HDV 89 , - - - - - -
- -- 300 i 300 - - - - -
CS-136 JUL 89 - - - - '- ' - 30130 -' - 1 - DA-140 JLH 89 - .-- - 'E - - - - -
- - - 100 1 90 DEC 89 - - .- -- -- - - - -
.- - - 200 1 200 CE-141.. MAR 89 ~~ ' '
- -: - J - it i te 9
i e f" '
-[_ ___a.'____ _____$
m. _ _ - * ' ' ' ' ' - - ' -
't __#^. ~ * '" "
- *D
"_ 9'Y"'--'YM-*3'tMae
- e W T94F- % Ai *
'=r ert#* g qui + T#3 =D'F-Pw+=W-9w itw== W.g + wis*-m u==ut-Mep-
( I TABLE C.VI.1 CCHCDURATIONS OF !.131 Di A!W IOO!HE SAMPLES COLLFCTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATetIC POWER STATI0Hs 1969 PESULTS D4 04ITS OF PCI/CU. METER 1 ' 2 ' SIGMA - - OROUP I GROUP II GROUP III' j WgtR ................................ ............................................., ......... e 1B 1Z t 3A 5 66 14- 120 1 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20. < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 ' t c 10 < 10 .c 10- < 10 - <0 < 10- < 10 . c 20 3 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 30 4 < 20 < #0 < 20 < 20 < 10 < 10 < 10 <7 5 < 10 <9 <9 C 9 C 10 < 10 - < 10 < 20 6 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 -<7 < 10 < 10 < 30 l
~
7 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 <9 < 10 <9 <4 i 6 < 10 < 10 < 10 < $0 <7 C to < 20 < 10 9 <20- < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10- < 10 <9= < to 10 't 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 9 < 20 < 10 -C6-11 < 10 - < 10 < 10 < 10 C9 C 10 < 10 < 10 it c 10 < 19 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10' . c 10 <9 13 C6 C6 <6 C6 <7 < 9 <0 < 20 14 ( 20 < 20 < 20 < 20. < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 - 15 C6 C9 <6 C 9. <9 < 10 < 10 < 10 16 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 C9 < 9 <6 ' c 20 17 <6 <9 <6 C9 C 9 < 10 <9 C6-16 C 10 < 10 't 10 < 10 - <5 < 10 .c to - C 20 19 C 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 20 < 20 < 10 20 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 21 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 9 < 10 < 10 < 9 22 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 - < 10 < 10 < 10 23- C 30 < 10 < 10 < 10 C '10 < 10 <9 C9 f4 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10 < 10 . c 10 < 10~ - 25 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 C 9 . .<9 <0 <6-26 C 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10 < 10 < 10 <6' 27 <9 <0 <9 < 9 < 10 .< 10- < 10 '<7 to < 10 < 10 .< 10 < 10 C9 .< 10 C9 C9 29 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10" <9 ' 30 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10 -< 10' < 10 < 10 3 31 < 10 '< 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 ' < 9 < 10 i 32 < 20 < 10 < 20 < 20 < 10 C 20 < 20 < 20 -l 33 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 C7 < 10 < 10 <6 1 34 <9 C9 < 10 - < 10 < 9 < 10 - < 10 . <6 'j 35 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 10 . < 20 < 20 .c9 l 36 C 30 < 30 < 30 < 30 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 20 , 37 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 <9 .j 36 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 ~< 10 < 20 < 20 < 20'- ! 39 < 20 < to < to < 20 C 10 ' c 20 < 20 < 10 .! 40 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20' <7- ! 41 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 20 < 9- - < 10 < 10 < 20 42 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20. < 10 43 < 10 ( 10 < 10 < 10 <9 C9 <9 ( 6 44 C9 < 9 C9 <9 <6 C 10 < 10 ' < 20 45 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < to < 10 < 10 ' < 10 46 C 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 C 9- C9 <6 : 47 < 20 < 20 < 20 < 20 C9 C 10 C.1b < 20 = l 46 < 10 < 10 (1) < 10 < 10 <6' <6 < 10 49 1
< 10 < 10 < 10 < 10 <9 < 20 < 20 -T*0 -
50 < 10 < 20 < 30 < 20 <6 <9 <9 <o
< 20 < 20 51 < 20 < 20 < 10 < 10 < 10 < 20 52 < 20 < 30 < 20- C 20 < 10 < 10 C .10 < 10 l NEAH < 14 < 14 C 14 < 14 < 10 < 12 < 11 < 12 (1) SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS 3ECTIGl FOR EXPLAHATION Ii l; -
iI e I' I TABLE C.VII.1 CllpCtHTRATID48 0F SR.69e 98 90 #5 6#91A EPtITTERS D4 MIU('9AMPLES ' COLLECTIO D4 THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION,1969 RESULTS D4 th4ITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SIONA COLLECTICH STAYICH Daft '99 69 SR.90. K 40 CS.134 CS.137 BA.140 'LA.140
....... .......... ............. ............. .... ....... ............. ............. ............. ........s....
0 02/20/09 E 05/t9/89' 'C 1
<5 1 2 t-
- 0. 7.- 2 0.6 1300 t 100 1500 2 100
't 1-
<t'
<2
<t c 30
( 6
< 10 ~ '
< 3-06/21/89 <t - 2.5 2 0.7 -1400 2 100 <1 < 1- C5 -< 3 11/1 V69 <4 t.1 2 0.9 1300- t 100 <3- <3 C7 <3 MEM4 <3 1.6. 1 1.7 1375 2 191 <t <t .c 11- C5 J 02/20/69 <t 1.1 1 0.4 -1500 - 2 200 <t' <t C4- < t.
t 05/29/69 C 0.6 2.0 2 0.6 1400 t 100"- <1 6~ 2-3 .c5- <3 06/21/89 <1 1.6 2 0.6 1400 1 100 <1 . c 1- <6'- C3 ., 11/13/69 <5 2.1 1 0.4 1400 t 100 <2 <t -<6 -<3: ] MEAH <t0 1.6 2 0.9 1425 2 100 <t 3' 2 4 -- <5 <3 0 02/20/09 4'. 1 0.6 1 05/t9/89 06/21/89
<4
< 0.6
<t 1.4 1.7 1.9 2 0.6 20.7' 1300 t 100 1200 2 100 1500_ 1 100
<t
<4
<t
<3
~ 2 3> .< 30
- < 10-
<6
< to
' <5 'I 't
.c t C 3- !
11/13/69 < t 2.1 2 0.6- 1300 2 100 <1 <t C4 <t 'I MEAH - < t.2 1.6 1 0.6 1325 2 252 <t 3 2't. < 13 l C 5' ' MEAN HEAR 6Y FARMS < 2.4 1.7 2 1.1 1375 ' t 193 < t '- 3 l13 < 10 <4 H 02/20/09 <4 0.6 2 0.3 1300 2 100- <1 '< 1- < 30 < 10 2-05/29/89 < 0.7 2.0 2 0.6 1300 2 100 < t -! <2 : C6- < 3' 06/21/09 C2 1.0 1 0.6 1200
- 100 < t- C C5- <3 t I
11/13/09 <3 1.4 2 0.4 '1300 t 100 <1 <1' =<4- <2 I MEAN INTERMEDIATE FARMS C 2.4 1.3 2 1.2 1275 2 100 <1- <1 -..c 11 <5 i A 02/20/09 05/t9/89 96/11/89 11/13/09
<5 C 0.7
<1
<t 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1 0.4 2 0.6 1 0.5 2 0.6 1400 t 100 1500 t.100 1500 t 100 1500 2 100
<1
<t
<2
<t
<1
=<t.
<t
' <t
< 30
<5 C6
<4-C 10-
< 2:
C3
<t i
1 MtAH < 2,2 1.3 2 0.1 1475 1 100 <2' <t c 11- C4 i~ B 02/20/09 <4 1.2 1 0.7 1300 1 100 <t <t < 100' < 40 i 05/29/09
. < 0.6 1.7 2 0.7 1300 1 100 <t <t C5 <t i Out t/89 <t 1.6 2 0.6 1400 2 100 <t < t' .c6 <3 -0 11/13/09 C2 1.6 2 0.6 1300 2 100 <t <t C4 '!
8 Mt#4 < t.2 1.6 1 0.5' ~1325 1 100 <t <t' < 29
<2 C 12 NEAN DISTANT FARMS C t.2 1.4 1 0.5 1400 t ISS <t <t ' < 20 <6
{ I I I ,
eF 4 TABLE C-VII.2 ' C0HCENTRATIG45 OF I-131 D4 MILK SAMPLES CDLLECTED D4 THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATGtIC POWER STATIG4,1969 RESULTS De LHITS OF PCI/ LITER i 2 SIGMA 'I HEARBY FARMS D(TERMEDIATE FARMS - DISTANT FARMS COLLECTICH G J O D L M N A B C ' E .- DATE 4 01/16/89 < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0. 04 - '< 0.03 < 0.05. < 0.0 3 - 02/20/89 < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.04 < 0.05 .< 0.05 < 0.06 ' < 0.0 3 - < 0.04 < 0.07 03/20/89 < 0.02 < 0.03 < 0.04 . < 0.03 < 0.05 < 0.03 04/03/89 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.06 .< 0.04 04/17/89 < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.05 < 0.04 < 0.06' < 0.04 05/01/89 < 0.05 < 0.06 < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0.06 < 0.05 05/15/89 < 0.05 < 0.07 < 0.05 < 0.05 - < 0.06 < 0.06 05/29/89 < 0.10 < 0.10 < 0.08 < 0.06 < 0.07 < 0.1 < 0.1- < 0.1 < 0.06 < 0.09- '< 0.1 06/12/89. < 0.06 '< 0.06 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.10 < 0.05-06/26/89 C 0.05 < 0.06 < 0.04 . < 0.04 < 0.07 < 0.04 07/10/89 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.04 . < 0.07 . -< 0.04 07/24/89 C 0.04 < 0.05 < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0.06 < 0. 04 . 06/07/89 < 0.07 < 0.05 -< 0.05 _ < 0.06 < 0.06 < 0.04 , 06/2t/89 < 0.04 < 0.04- < 0.03 < 0.03 < 0.04 < 0.04 < 0.04 . < 0.06 - .< 0.03 < 0.M < 0.07
- 09/04/89 < 0.07 < 0.06 < 0.06 < 0.07 .< 0.1 < 0.06
- 09/18/89 < 0.06 < 0.07 < 0.05 '< 0.05 < 0.06 < 0.04 10/02/89 'C'O.04 < 0.04 < 0.03 ' < 0.03 7 < 0.05' < 0.03 :
! 10/16/89 . < 0.04 < 0.03 < 0.04- < 0.03 .< 0.05 < 0.03 ! 10/30/89 < 0.06 < 0.06 < 0.07 .
. < 0. 04 ' < 0.09 < 0.05 i 11/13/89 < 0.06' < 0.07 < 0.06 - -< 0.07- < 0.06 < 0.1 ' < S.t .< 0.1 . :< 0.06 ' < 0.00 < 0.19 12/11/89 < 0.04 < 0.04: < 0.05 - < 0.03 ' -
< 0.06 < 0.03 i . nemH < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 - < 0.05 -<0.*- < 0.07 .< 0.e5 -< 0.07 < 0.04. < 0.06
< 0.0.
- i. f
~?
l' l E. E E E E O E E M EE O !E O E E E E' _' E - _ _ _ _ _ _
i.
'O' .
& & S- & M .S~ U U & &'- & M &i TABLE C-VIII.1 00HCD4TRATIG4S OF GROSS ALFMA, GROSS BETA, TRITIu1 MB Gmett D1ITTERS B4 NELL MLTER .
SM1PLES COLLECTED De THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTQt ATOMIC PO4ER STATIG4,1989 RESULTS DI utITS OF PCI/ LITER i 2 SIGML COLLECTIG4 GROSS GROSS AQUEOUS- . STATIG4 DATE ALPHA SETA H-3 K-40 t04-54 CD-58 FE-59 00-60 54-65 . c 1U 03/04/89 0.9 1 0.8 5 i1 90 1 40 <6 < 0.3 < e.4 < e.8 .< 9.4 < 0.7 i 05/07/89 < e.9 3.2 1 0.8 110 1 50 <5 < 0.3 < 0.3 < e.6 < 9.3 < e.6 08/05/89 < 0.5 3.1 1 0.8 90 - 2 40 <7 < 0.4 < e.5 '<1 < e.4 < e.7 11/05/89 2 11 4.5 i 9.9 22e' i 6e 8 15 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.8 < e.3 .< G.4 MEA;4 1.1 1 1.3 4.0 1 1.9 130 1 120 7 i3 < 0.3 < e.4 < e.8 < 0.4 < e.7 IV 03/04/89 < 0.5 2.5 1 0.8 70 1 40 <5 < e.4 < e.4 < 1.0 ' < 0.3 < 0.8 ! 05/0W89 < 0.5 2.3 1 0.7 130 i 5e <4 < 0.2 < e.2 < e.6 < 0.3 .< 0.5 08/05/89 < 0.4 1.2 i 4.6 50 i 40 <6 < e.3 < e.4 < 1.0 -< e.4 < e.7 i f 11/05/89 < e.5 3.3 i 8.8 < 6e .<5 < e.3 .< 0.3 < 0.8 < 0.3 < e.7 < MEM4 < e,5 2.3 i 1.7 Se i 7e <5 < e.3 < e.3 < e.9 . < e.3 < e.7 - 7 03/04/89 < 0.6 2.9 i 4.9 6 0 -- 1 30 10 19 ' < 0.4 < e.4 : < e.9 .< e.4 < e.8 ! 05/08/89 < 0.6 3.8 i s.8 50 1 50 7 25 < e.3 < e.3 < e.8. ' < e.3 : < e.6 : 08/05/89 < 0.5 3.1 -i 0.8 14e i 5e - <5 < e.3 < 0.3 < e.7 < e.3 < e.5 . 1 11/05/89 < e.8 1.5 i s.7 130 ' i Se <6' < 0.4 < 0.4 _ < 1.0 - < e.3 < e,8 HEM 4 < 0.6 2.8 :1 1.9 100 1 9e 7~ i 4' ' < e.4 C 9.4 < e.9 < 0.3, < e.7 ; 40 03/04/89- < 0.7 3.5 i 9.9 60- '2 50 i<4 < e.3 < e.3" < e 9. < e .4 . < e.7 l 05/07/89 < 0.8 2.3 i e.7- 16e i 60 -<5 ~ < e.3 - . < 0.3 ' < 0.8 - < e.3 < e.6 . 08/05/89 < 0.4 2.1 i e.7 to 1 30 <4 < 0.3 < 0.4 < e . 9 .. < e.4 < e.7 11/05/89 < 0.7 1.7 ' i 3.7 - 220 i Se <5 .< e.3 < e.3 - . < e.8 < e.3 . < e.6 NEAN < 0.7 -2.4 <i 1.5 13e i 140 -l < 5 < e.3 < e.3 -< e.9 <e4 < e.7 MEAid ALL STATICHS 0.7 i e.8 2.9- 12.1. 11e i 110 6 -13 < 0. 3 ._ < e.3 < e.8 ,< e.3 < e.7 .j i ( , ., .A
!t -
4 i- , ! i t ] i
.A. . ~ .~M .- _. Ai, e ,~ r ~~ -. ~ . M ~.1,
, ,..M. ,. ,4, - i-A # 4. ,....n'e~....-,,,,,.-
TABLE C-VIII.1 CG4CENTRATIG4S OF GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUPt me Gar 9th EHITTERS D4 WELL 646TER SAr1PLES COLLECTED Di THE VICD4ITY OF PEAOf SOTTurt ATGtIC FG4ER STATIG4, 1969 RESULTS D4 4A4ITS OF PCI/ LITER i 2 SI9th COLLECTIG4 STATIG4 DATE ZR-95 M5-95 CS-134 CS-137 84-140 LA-140 10 03/04/89 < 0.9 C 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.4 <3 < t I 05/07/89 < 0.6 C 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 <2 < t.0 06/05/89 < 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.4 < 0.4 <5 < 2 11/05/89 < 0.6 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.2 <2 < 1 NEM4 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.3 <3 < 1.3 SV 03/04/89 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.4 < 0.3 <3 . < 1 05/06/89 < 0.5 ..< 0.3 < 0.2 < 0.2- <2 < 0.8 06/05/89 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.4 <4 < 2 11/05/89 < 0.8 < 0.4 C 0.3 < 0.3 <3 < 2 NEAN < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <3 < 1.5 - 7 03/04/89 < 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.4 < 0.4 <3~ <1 05/06/89 < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <3 <1 06/05/89 < 0.7 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 <3 <t tt/05/89 C 0.9 < 0.5 < 0.3 < 0.* <4 C 2
.NEAN < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 6.4
<3 <2 40 03/04/89 < 0.7 < 0.3 < 0.3 < 0.3 <2 '<1 05/07/89 < 0.6 .< 0.4 < 0.3 ~ < 0.3 <3 '<2~
06/05/89 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <4 <2 1t/05/89 < 0.8 < 0.4 < 0.3 < 0.3 <3 <2 NEAN < 0.7 < 0.4 < 0.3 ' < 0.3 <3 <2 ttEAN ALL STATIONS < 0.8 <'G.4 .< 0.3' < 0.3 <3 < 1.5
. M -. .
& && W - &; $ M. S U S~ \' sS
- = - -- - -- - - -. = - - -
=_ -
, . ~ , .- - . . . . -
-.i TABLE C.IX.1 CCHCENTRATICHS OF SR.69 AND St.90 IN VtGETATICH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIO4.1969 .
- t RESULTS IN LNITS OF PCI/ GRAM (WET)
- 2 SIGMA I. COLLECTION STATICH - DATE MEDIA
$#.69 SR.90 .
I 1 07/21/69' SE#13 -
'06/16/69 COMI Come STRIHG BEAN
< 0.1.
<-0.005
< 0.006
< 0.007
. -0.52 1 0.05 0.006 1.0.002 0.014 1 0.002 0.005 1 0.002:
i i
.f 09/2V69 - CORH HUSKS C 0.006- 0.007 2 0.003 SOY BE#1 LEAVES C 0.007 0.056 2 0.005 5
.~'
3A' ME#4-07/21/89:. APPLE STEMS
.C 0.022
< 0.004.
0.102 2 0.412
-0.016 1 0.002
- 06/16/09 WILD APPLE- .c 4.009 - 0.055 2 0.005. -}
09/23/69 WILD YEG C 0.01 0.16 1 0.01 MEAH < 0,006 0.0641 0.170 ~ ' I 4H 07/21/89' WILD YEG. 06/16/69 WILD VEG' 09/23/69 WILD VEG
< 0.006
< 0.01
< 0,006-0.031't 0.003' 0.011 1 0.004.
-0.082 t 0.005 T
t MEMI < 0.007 0.021 1 0.020 - 5- 07/22/89 DEETS < 0.007 0.012 1 0.003~ . STRING BEANS < 0.02 _ -0.09 2 0.01 t I 06/16/69 -CORH i
< 0.004- 0.006 1 0.001 STRING BE44S < 0.01- 0.013 1 0.004 09/23/69 BEET TOPS < 0.02 -< 0.007-CARROT TOPS < 0.06 < 0. 04 -- {
MEAN < 0.020 -0.026 1 0.066 07/22/89 CORN
~
60 < 0.004 0.015 1 0.002.- + STRIHG BEAHS < 0.02- .0.079 2.0.009 , I 06/16/69 CORH STRING BEAHS-09/23/69 CARROT TOPS LIMA BEAN LEAVES
< 0.005
< 0.02
< 0.06
< 0.02
.< 0.002-0.017 1 0.006'
< 0.02' 0.12; 2 0.01
'i I 0 MEAH 07/22/89 LETTUCE STRING BEANS-
< 0.021
< 0.05
< 0.01
~ 0.042 1 0.093 0.05 2 0.01 0.019 2 0.004'
.L
.j
)
06/16/69 OKRA C 0.02 '. 0.011 1 0.005 - , 1URNIPS < 0.03- . < 0.000-09/23/69 OKRA LEAVES < 0.04 0.22- t 0.03 TURHIP GREENS < 0.04 -0.12 -2 0.02 ,
- MEAH < 0.03 0.071 1 0.166, M 23 07/21/89 APPLES C 0.003 0.011-t 0.001 PEACHES < 0.01 0.045 2 0.005-06/16/69 CORH < 0.006 0.009 2 0.002 %
PEACHES < 0.02 0.062 2 0.006 -l I-. 09/23/69 OKRA LEAVES SOY BEAN LEAVES
< 0. 006 '
< 0.01 O.032 1 0.004 0.11 1 0.01
- '. MENI < 0.009 0.046 2 0.061' 5 MEAN ALL STATIONS < 0.019 0.057 2 0.169 8
- I z <
l 5'
, , _ .J.___ __ _ - , , . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . -.__ ___ __ __.i_______.__. _ . _ . _ _ _ _
l
+
l
.I
~
TABLE C-IX.2 CONCDfTPATIONS OF GAffM BtITTERS D4 VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED - D4 THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTT0rt ATONIC POWER STATIW1.1969 RESULTS D4 t#4ITS OF PCI/GRArt (HET) 1 . 2 SIGPM STATION COLLECTICH i CODE PERIOD HEDIA BE-7 K-40 I-131 <CS-t34. CS-137 RA-226 TM-226. ( 1 07/21-07/21 BEAHS 1.6 1 0.2 5.0 1 0.5 '< 0.01 < 0.006 'O.02 1 0.01 < 0.1 ' O.04 i 9.93 CONH 1.5 t 0.3 S.S i 0.9 < 0.03 < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.3 < 0.02. , 08/18-06/18 CORN < 0.2 3.4 1 0.5 < 0.07 < 0.02 < e.02 < 0.4 < e.03 i STRD4G BEAH 0.8 i 0.2 5.9 :10.6 < 0.02 . < 0.009 < t.009 < 0.2 < 9 et ~ 1 09/23-09/23 CDRM MJSKS 0.8 1 0.2 1.2 1 0.2 < 0.02 <-0.006 < 0.009 < e.2 < 0.02 i , SOY BEAN LEAVES 0.87 i 0.10 2.0 1 0.2 < 0.02 . < 0.9M < 0.004 < 0.1e < e.000 . ! l NEAte 0.% i 1.03 4.4 1 5.6 < 0.03 < 8.010 0.912 1 0.913 < 9.22' 9.921 1 9.924 . 3A 07/21-07/21 APPLE STEMS 6.06 't 0.05 1.2 1 0.1 < 0.007 < 0.003 < S.003 < 0.05 < e.004 l 08/tS-08/16 HILD APPLE < 0.03 1.0 1 0.1- < 0.98 < 0.003 , < 0.9M . '< 0.07 < e.eM 09/23-09/23 WILD VEG 2.0 1 0.2 5.6 10.6- < 0.02 < 0. 0M < 0.995 .< e.t < e.gte i HEAH 0.70 i t.25 t.6 t 5.2 < 0.01t < 0. 0% ' < 0.9M _< 0.07 < 8.997 4H
~
07/21-07/21 WILti .Ea 0.7 -i O.1 6.0 1 0.6 '< 0.02 - < 0.0M - < 0.0% < 0.1 ' < e 009 '. 06/16-06/18 WILD V*G -0.2 1 0.1 4.3 1 0.4 < 0.02 < 0.006 ' < 0.006 C 9.1 < 0.01 09/23-09/23 HILD VEG 0.24 1 0.07 3.9 .1 0.4 < 0.010- < 0.003 _ < 0.0M . < 0.0S < 8.006 HEAH 0.36 1 0.56 4.7 1 2.2 < 8.017 < 0.0M < 0.0M - < e.09 < e.See 5 07/22-07/22 BEETS 6.25 i 0.05 '4.2 .i 9.4 ~ < 0.007 < 0.003 < 0.003 < < 0. M 9.018 1 9.9M , STRING BEAH 1.8- 19.2- 6.1 i 8.6 < 0.01 c ' 9.09#- 9.M i 0.01--8.3 -1 0.2 0.194 i 6.019 08/16-08/18 CORH
< 0.03~ 3.0 1 0.3 < 0. 01 ' < 0.004 -< e.094 < 0.06 < e.007 .!
STRDas BEAN 0.3 10.1- 6.1 1 0.6 < 0.021 < 9.006 < 0.005 < S.09 < 9.006 09/23-09/23 BEET TOPS 0.41 1 0.06 6.2 1 0.6 < 0.01- < 0.004 < 0.004 < S 00 < e.007 CARROT TOPS- 0.50 1 0.07 9.3 1 0.9 < 0.02 ~ < 0.0041 < S.9M < 0.07 < 0.005 5- HEAH < 0.013 0.55 i 1.27 .5.8 -1 4.3 < 0.004- 0.010 i e.029 s.11 i 0.te 0.924 2 e.075 1; i i 9 k 2 . k
=
S ' S S & & & & [Mc . S S &' O O S S TABLE C-IX.2 CWCENTRATIONS OF Gm9tA DtITTERS D4 VEGETATION SAMPLES COLLECTED : D4 THE VICD41TY OF PEACH 80TT0Pt ATatIC PONER STATION.1969 , RESULTS D4 tA4ITS OF PCI/GRmt (HET) i 2 SI9th ., STATIM 1 (X)LLECTION f CODE PERIOO MEDIA BE-7 K-40 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 RA-226 TM-226 60 07/22-07/22 COR4 < 0.06 ' 0.21 1 0.96- 4.2 2 0.4 < 0.01 < 0.004- 4.999 i 0.9 % -< 9.906 . STRD4G BEAN 0.60 1 0.06- 3.2 1 9.3- < 0.007 < 0.903 0.016 1 0.995.9.13 1 9.18' 9.933 1 9.994- , ! 06/16-06/16 (X)RH ~ < 0.05 ~ -3.2 1 0.3 C 0.02 - < 0.905 < 9.905 < 0.99 C 9.906 STRING BEAH 1.1 1 0.2 3.6 1 0.4 < 0.03 < 0.006 - < 9.996 < 9.1 < e et 09/23-09/23 CARROT TOPS 6.41 1 0.07 9.2 '1 0.9 < 0.C2 < 0.9M 0.026 i 9.906 9.3.- 1 S.1 . 9.12. i 9.99 LDtt BEAN LEAVES 0.56 i 8.09 3.3 1 0.3 < 8.01 < 0.005 -< e.905 < 0.06 .< 0.906 MEst 0.49 1 0.73 4.5 i 4.7 < 8.016 - < 0.995 0.0121 9.916 c.13 i s.17 9.e31 i s.999 '~ 6 07/22-07/22 LETTUCE 0.40 1 0.07 4.4 2 0.4 < 0.91 < 0.004 9.927 i G.986 ' < 9.99 9.977 i S.999 STRD4G BEAN 0.22 .i 9.06 2.7 t 9.3 < 0.01 < 9.004 < 0.9M < e.06 . < e.907 -1 , 06/20-06/20 OKRA 0.2:-10.1 3.5 i 9.4 < 9.02 .< e.906 - < e.9% . ' < e .1 - < e.Se9-TURNIPS- .9.29 i 0.05 3.7 i 9.4 < 0.906 < 9.003 9.912 1 9.905 9.19 . i 9.99 0.047 i 9.905'
- 09/23-09/23 OKRA LEAVES 6.22 1 0.06 3.3 1 0.3 < 0.01 < 8.943 -8.016 1 0.947 9.1 1 9.1 < 9.946 TURilIP GREENS 0.55 i 6.06 6.3 2 0.6 < 9.01 < 9.9M 8.945 i 9.919 9.4 1 0.1 0.16 i 9.92:
MEAN 0.31 i 9.27 4.0 2 2.5 .< 0.011 < 0.9% 0.016 i 8.031 s.16 i 9.25 0.954 i 9.136 '- .4 23 07/21-07/21 APPLES < 0.02 1.0 i 0.1 < 0.006 - < 0.003 9.907 i 9.904 < 0.95 l < 9.904 ' PEACHES < 0.92 . 3.4 i 0.3 .
.< e.009 '< e.003 < 0.903 - < 0.e5 ~ < e.994 .
06/16-06/16 COR4 < 0.04 - 2.2 1 0.2 < 0.92 < 9.004 - < 9.905
. < 0.1 < 0.996 -
i : 2.0 PEACHES < 0.62 i 9.2 ' < 9.91 , < 0.002- 4.006 i 9.905 < 9.95 : .< 0.994 09/23-09/23 APPLE LEAVES 0.7 i 4.1 3.5 1 0.3- C 6.02 < 0.995 < 9. 905 . . < 0.1- . 0.05 i 9.92 ~ . , 30Y DEAN LEAVES f.3 10.2: 3.4 ' i 0. 3 . < 0.92~ < 0.995 --( 9.006 < e.1 < e.91 MEAN - 0.35' i 1.06' 2.6 1 2.8 ' < 0.015 < 0.004 0.005 1 e.903 < 0.36 9.913 i 9.036 : MEAN ALL STATICHS 0.53 1 1.07 4.1 ' 1 4.3 .< 0.816 < 0.095 0.910 1 0.020 0.13 i s.19 e.025 1 0.976 + 4 .. b
.( ,
1- . n,s 'we. q i . g,r = _3.wia.---. _ gay..- j MM M + y ae -wMw, j ggh' 4' fa- - 4,, e 6'-'T'* g5' 1
" N lf W *IN3y stetr' .-W --
' yamp' i- 'ii e 3 'y%- t*A g- T7t g' E e - ti4y#1g
. -t t TABLE C-X.1 CG3CENTRATIG4S OF GROSS BETA, SR-89, SR-90 MW GAP 914 EMITTERS DE SOIL SAMPLES COLLECTED D4 THE VICD1ITY OF. PEACH BOTTOM ATGtIC POWER STATION, 1969 - RESULTS De L94ITS OF PCI/ GRAM DRT i 2 Slett - COLLECTICH , STATIG4 DATE GROSS BETA SR-89 SR-90 BE-7 K-40 CS-134 CS-137 CE-141 RA-226 TH 1AA 06/04/89 3.4 2 0.4 < 0.02 0.109 i 0.006 < 0.2 15.7 1 0.8 < 0.92 9.45 i 8.04 < 9.94 9.66 i 9.96 9 11/11/89 0.8 1 0.2 < 0.04 0.05 i 0.01 < 0.4 23 i1 < 0.03 0.17 i 9.05 9.99 i 9.98 1.9 1 9.1 1.1 l MEAN 2.1 i 3.7 < 0.03 0.979 1 0.063 < 0.3 19.4 2 10.3 < 0.93 0.31 2 9.49 9.97 i 9.07 9.63 1 9.46 1.9 2 06/04/89 6.1 1 0.5 < 0.07 0.46 i 0.01 < 0.4 22 i1 < 0.34 0.76. i 9.97 < 9.97 1.2 1 0.1 1.6 11/11/89 1.7 1 0.2 < 0.6 34 12 0.99, 1 0.97-9.6 i 9.t' . < 9.1 1.7 i 9.2 ' 2.2 . 3 i HEM 4 3.9 i 6.2 < 0.07 0.46 1 0.00 - < 9.5 26 i 17 0.97 1 0.97 9.76 i S.M < 9.99 1.5 i 9.7 f.9 3A 06/04/89 3.3 1 0.3 < 0.07 .0.022 1 0.005 < 0.4 16 i1 0.06 i 8.04 .1.16 i 9.99 . < 9.M 1.9 i 9.1 f.2 11/11/89 1.4 2 0.2 < 0.04 0.200 2 0.010 < 0.6 19 22- < 0.05 9.69 i 9.06 < 9.1 1.4 i 9.2 f.2 NEAN 2.4 i 2.7 < 0.06 0.111 i'O.252 < 0.5- 19 i1- 0.96 i 9.91 9.93 1 9.66 < 9.96 1.2 . i 9.6 1.2 4 4H 06'04/89 2.4 1 0.3 < 0.03 9.096 i 9.906 < 8.1 3.2 i 9.3 < 9.91 ' 9.29 i 9.02 < 0.92 ' 9.26 i 9.C; 9.3
- 11? 1/89 1.2 i 0.2 < 0.05 0.09 i 9.02 < 9.4 12 i1 < 9.94 0.26 i 9.96 < 9.99 9.8 1 0.1 f.9 MEAN 1.6 i 1.7 < 0.04 0.093 i 0.006 < 0.3 , 7.6 i 12.4 .< 0.93 -9.26 i 9.04 < 9.96- 0.54 1 9.74 9.7 :
5 06/04/09 2.2 i 9.3 < 0.03 'O.066 1 0.999 0.4 't 0.3 33' i1 0.06.--i 0.04 0.27 i 9.95 < 0.96 1.01 i 9.99 f.5 11/11/89 2.4 1 0.3 < 0.04 0.04f i 9.007 . < 0.5 . 36 12 0.06 i 9.06 - 9.47 .1 9.90 < 9.1 1.6 1 9.2 t .7 -' l NEAH 2.3 1 0.3 < 0.04 0.053 1 9.035 '0.5 1 0.1 35 'i4 0.06 1 0.00 0.37 i 9.26 - < 9.06 1.31 1 0.03 1.6 66 06/04/89 2.6 i 0.4 < 0.07 0.31 i 0.02 < 0.3 16 11 < 0.03 0.53 1 9.95 ~< 0.96 . 9.89 1 0.99 1.5 , 11/11/89 1.7 1 0.3 < 0.05 0.19 i 0.01 < 0.4 14 .i1 '< 0.94 9.39 i 9.06.' I 9.06 1.1 .i 9.1 1.4 '[ . MEAN 2.2 - i 1.3 < 0.06 9.25 1 0.17 . < 0.4 15 13- < 0.94 0.46 1 3.29 C 9.07 1.99 1 0.39 1.5 i MEAN alt. STATIONS 2.4 i 2.8 < 0. 05 ' O.149 i 0.266 0.4 i 0.3 - 20.5 i 19.6 9.04. t 9.04 9.52yi 9.57 9.97 i 9.95 1.05 i 9.79 1.3 . 6 f
~
. ..m4 . . - __. _ ,
$N-y a
O E O E O E'O h- E E E .E O M E E N E k i TABLE C-XI.1 90fTHLY TLS RESULTS FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC P0NE2 STATION,1989 RESULTS IN tA4ITS C? MILLI-90ENTGDVST3. HO.12 S.9. 1 STATIOH MEAN i JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JL94 JUL AUG SEP OCT POV DEC CODE 2 S.D.113 1A 6.711.4 6.2 1 0.4 6.8 1 0.4 5.4 1 0.9 6.2 i 0.5 6.2 i 4.3 7.5 i 0.5 6.2 1 0.3 7.7 1 0.5 6.7 i 9.6 7.5 i 9.3 7.4 i 0.8 4.3 1 0.5 18 5.711.1 5.5 1 0.3 6.4 1 0.3 4.7 i 0.5 5.5 1 0.4 5.510.4 6.61:0.5 5.2 1 0.5 6.1 i 9.5 5.6 1 0.3 6.3 i 9.5 5.6 i 9.2 5.2 1 9.3 1C 6.7 1 1.5 6.4 1 0.3 7.3 1 0.1 6.2 i 4.5 6.910.7 5.1 1 0.2 7.6 1 0.4 6.0 i 1.0 7.3 i 8.4 6.7 i 9.5 7.4 i 9.4 7.1 1 8.4 e.2 i 9.5 . 10 6.3 1.1 6.3 1 0.5 6.9 1 0.4 5.3 1 0.3 6.1 1 0.4 5.910.4 7.3 1 0.6 6.8 1 0.4~ 6.7 1 0.3 6.3 1 4.3 6.9 i 4.4 6.2 1 0.3 5.9 2 4.3 1E 6.4 i 1.4 6.2 1 0.4 7.0 1 0.4 5.1 1 0.7 6.1 1 0.5 6.3 1 0.3 7.6 i 0.5 5.8 1 0.4 6.9 i 9.3 6.4 1 0.7 7.2 1 8.4 6.2 1 0.3 5.9 1 8.2 1F 7.4 1 1.2 7.1 2 0.4 8.2 1 0.8 6.4 i 0.5 7.3 1 0.6 7.0 i 4.4 8.3 1 0.6 6.8 i 9.7 8.0 i 9.5 7.5 i 9.7 8.1 1 0.4 7.7 i 8.5 7.8 1 9.8 1G 5.0 1 1.2 4.8 1 0.2 5.7 i 0.5 4.0 i 0.6 4.7 i 0.3 4.8 1 0.4 6.1 1 4.3 4.5 i 4.2 5.6 1 0.2 4.8 i s.3. 5.*> 1 0.3 5.9 i s.2 4.6 i 4.2 1H 6.6 i 1.3 6.5 i 0.2 7.310.5 5.3 2 0.3 6.4 2 0.3 6.4 1 0.4 7.6 i 0.6 6.2 i 9.4 7.1 1 0.3 6.7 i s.2 7.3i6.56.5i9.3 '6.2 1 9.4 , 1I 5.711.3 5.2 1 0.1 6.2 i 0.2 4.6 i s.7 5.4 i 0.5 6.5 1 0.4 6.8 1 0.2 4.9 1 0.3 6.2 1 0.4 5.5 t 0.9 6.1 1 0.3 5.6 i 9.3 5.2 i 4.3 1J 7.5 i 1.5 7.0 1 0.4 8.3 1 0.6 6.4 i 0.3 7.1 1 0.6 8.4 1 1.6 8.7 1 0.5 6.9 1 0.6 8.0 1 1.0 7.4 2 0.5 8.1 1 8.8 7.4 i 9.5 6.6 1 4.5 1L 4.321.5 3.910.3 4.8 i 0.2 2.6 i 0.2 4.1 i 0.2 3.9 i e.2 5.4 1 0.5 3.8 1 4.2 4.9 i 9.3 4.4 i 8.5.'s.1 i e.2 4.4 i s.2 4.5 1 4.6 1H 4.1 1 1.2 3.9 1 0.2 4.5 1 0.2 3.4 1 0.3 4.0 1 0.2 3.9 1 0.2 5.2 1 0.4 3.4 i e.1 4.5 i s.3 3.7 i 9.3 5.1 i e.5 4.0 1 0.2 3.8 1 9.2 2 6.3 i 1.3 6.1 i 0.3 7.110.3 5.3 1 0.2 -6.1 1 0.5 6.0 1 0.3 7.3 i 9.4 5.7 1 0.6 6.5 i 9.6 6.3 i e.4 7.4 i s.3 6.310.3 5.7 i 8.5 3 3A 4.9 1 1.4 4.7 i 0.3 5.7 1 0.1 3.6 1 0.4 4.8 1 0.3 4.8 1 0.2 6.0 1 0.3 4.4 i 8.5 5.5 i 9.5 4.8 1 9.3 6.0 i 0.3 4.8 i s.3 4.3 i e.2
~
4K 4.9 1 1.5 4.4 i 0.1 5.9 1 0.4 3.6 1 0.5 4.8 1 0.4 5.1 1 0.4 6.3 1 0.3 4.5 1 0.3 5 .9 i 9.4 4.3 1 0.2 5.4 i S.t 4.8 i 9.2 4.6 i 4.1 5 6.1 1 1.2 5.9 i 0.3 6.6 1 0.4 5.2 1 0.5 5.9 i e.3 5.5 1 0.3 7.010.9 5.6 i 9.4 6.4 i 8.9 6.6 i 9.9 -7.119.4 6.1 1 4.3 5.6 1 9.3 68 5.4 1 1.4 5.3 1 0.2 6.1 1 0.3 4.1 1 9.4 5.0 1 0.4 5.1 1 0.4 6.4 i s.4 5.0 i e.3 5.6 i 9.5. 5.1 i e.7 6.5 i e.2 5.7 i 9.3 5.310.3' 1t44 7.4 i 1.6 7.0 1 0.3 8.3 1 0.6 5.9 i 8.5 7.0 1 0.6 7.2 i 0.4 8.5 1 0.8 6.8 i e.7 8.1 1 0.5 7.2 i 9.5 8.4 1 0.8 7.2 i s.5 7.1 i e.4 14 6.'$ i 1.5 6.3 1 0.3 7.0 i 0.5 5.310.6 6.3 1 0.5 6.2 1 0.4 7.2 i 0.8 5.7 i 9.4 6.7 i 0.6 6.5 i 9.3 7.7 1 0.5 6.5 1 0.3 7.819.3.' 12D 5.4 i 1.2 4.9 1 0.1 5.4 1 0.7 4.8 1 0.3 5.5 1 0.6 4.3 1 9.1 5.2 i 0.2 5.4 1 9.2 5.8 i 0.4_5.8 i 9.3 6.7 1 0.2 5.5 1 0.2 5.5 1 9.7 15 6.8 1 1.5 6.5 i 0.3 6.9 1 0.5 5.7 1 0.3 6.6 i 0.5 6.5 1 0.3 7.910.3 6.1 1 0.6 7.3 1 0.4 6.8 i 4.4 -8.1 1 0.4 6.7 i s.4 5.9 i 9.6 1 16 6.8 1 2.0 6.7 i e.6 7.3 2 0.7_ 5.2 1 0.9 6.310.5 6.5 1 0.5 7.7 1 0.6 6.3 1 0.6 6.9 i 0.7;6.9 i s.5 9.2 1 4.6 6.8 i 9.5 6.1 1 9.3 4 17 7.4 1 1.3 7.3 i 0.5 6.8 1 0.3 6.4 1 0.4 7.2 1 0.7. 7.3 1 0.4 8.2 i 9.7 6.9 i 9.5 8.2 1 0.8 7.6 1 0.4 8.5 i 0.5 7.6 1 0.4 6.8 i s.7
'18 7.2 1 2.3 6.7 i 0.6 7.3 i 0.3 5.5 i 0.2 6.8 i 0.5 6.3 i e.3 9.8 i 9.9 6.4 i 9.2 8.4 i 9.4 '7.4 i S.9 8.3 i S.6 7.0 1 0.6 6.3 i 4.6 .
J
- 1. HEAH Ate TWO TIMES THE STAteARD DEVIATION OF THE PO1TMLY RESULYS.
1
,.,,+..,.e - .x , a. w .-- .-.n.- y +m- ,w, -m~- y. g _ m .n, -
-(r r -, .,um.,.-g
4
- TABLE C-XI.1 NDHTHLY Tth REStJLTS FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POMER STATION,1989 RESULTS IH LNITS OF MILLI-DOD4TGOVSTD. NO. i 2 S.D.
1 4 i STATION MEM41 JM4 FE8 MAR APR MAY JLN JUL AUG 'SEP OCT f(N DEC . CODE 2 S.D. (4) , 19 6.8 i 1.5 6.710 7.5 1 0.4 5.2 1 0.5 6.6 1 0.5 6.5 1 0.3 7.8 1 0.5 6.3 1 0.5 7.2 1 0.5 7.4 i 9.5 7.8 2 0.6 6.9 1 0.7 6.1 1 0.3
'20 5.921.3 6.311.0 6.8 i O.5 5.3 2 9.8 5.7 1 0.4 5.5 1 0.2 6.8 i 0.3 5.0 1 9.2 6.0 i 9.3 5.8 i 9.4 6.9 2 0.3 5.710.4-5.529.4 ';
213 6.6 2 1.4 6.4 i 0.5 7.3 2 0.5 5.3 2 0.3 6.0 1 0.2 6.310.3 7.6 1 0.5 5.9 1 0.2 6.9 i 9.6 6.5 i 9.1 .7.5 i 9.* - 6.7 t 9.4 6.3 i 9.2 - 22 7.1 i 1.6 6.7 1 0.3 8.0 i 0.9 5.6 1 0.8 -6.8 1 0.6 6.8 1 0.4 8.1 1 9.7 6.7 1 8.6 7.6 1 0.6 - 7.9 i 9.4 8.4 1 9.6 6.7 i 9.4 6.319.6 ;! 23 6.8 1 1.4 6.5 1 0.3 7.8 1 0.6 5.4 i 9.4 6.8 i 0.6 6.7 i 0.6 7.7 1 0.5 6.3 1 0.4 7.2 1 0.6 6.5 1 0.2 7.8 1 9.6 6.8 1 0.2 6.6 1 9.5 24 5.4 i 1.4 5.0 1 0.4 6.1 1 0.4 4.1 1 0.5 4.9 1 0.2 5.3 1 0.4 6.5 i 9.5 4.9 i 0.3 5.8 i 9.5 5.1 1 9.72 6.319.2 5.2 1 9.3 5.1 1 0.1 26 7.5 i 1.8 7.1 1 0.5 8.1 2 9.6 5.8 1 0.3 6.8 i 0.7 7.2 1 0.5 8.5 i 9.9 6.8 2 0.5 8.2 1 9.8 7.7 1 0.7 9.1 2 9.6 7.4 1 0.3 7.t i 9.4 i ]l 27 6.8 i 1.5 6.4 1 0.4 7.7 i 0.6 5.3 1 0.4 6.6 i 0.6 6.7 i 9.3 7.9 i 9.6 6.1 i 9.6 7.2 1 9.5 6.710.6)7.919.6 6.7 2 0.5 6.9 i 9.3 ' 31 6.5 i 1.6 6.2 i 0.5 7.3 1 0.5 5.1 i 9.5 6.0 1 0.3 6.310.3 7.7 1 0,4 5.8 1 9.6 7.2 1 0.5 .6.4 i 9.3 7.6 i 9.3 6.4 i 9.4 6.1 1 9.3 32 7.2 i 1.7 6.8 i 0.5 7.8 i 1.1 . 5.7 1 0.8 6.7 1 0.7 7.3 1 0.8 8.3 1 9.7 6.6 i 9.5 8.9 i 9.5 6.9 i 9.4 8.5 i 9.6 7.2 1 0.5 4.4 1 0.4 4 334 5.1 2 1.6 4.8 i 0.2 5.9 1 0.3 3.5 i 9.4 4.9 2 0.4 5.1 1 0.3 .6.4 2 0.6 .4.5 1 0.2 : 5.7 i 9.5 ;4.7 1 9.2 6.2 1 9.3 5.0 1 0.2 5.9 i 9.4 38 7.0 1 1.8 6.6 i 9.3 7.8 1 0.5 5.319.4'6.419.6.6.9i9.5 8.2 i 9.3 6.2 1 0.6 7.9 i 9.5 6.9 i 9.5' 8.1 1 9.5~ 4.9 1 9.6 4.5 i 9.8 43 7.1 1 2.3 6.9 i 0.5 8.2 1 0.3 4.0 1 9.3 7.3 t 0.7 7.1 i 9.6 8.2 1 0.7 6.8 i 9.9 7.9 i 9.3 7.2 1 9.2 8.2 i 9.6 7.9 i 9.2 4.9 i 9.3 - e 42 7.0 i 1.8 7.8 1 0.7 8.7 1 0.7 5.710.4 6,4 1 0.57 6.7 i 9.4 8.0 1 9.8 6.0 1 0.7 7.6 i 9.6 6.5'i 9.3 7.8 i 9.6 6.7 i 9.6 6.4 1 0.6 43 7.4 i 1.7 7.2 1 0.4 8.3 1 0.5 6.2 i 9.6. 7.3 i 9.3 ~7.3 1 0.5 8.5 1 0.7 6.8 i 9.4 S.4 1 0.7 7.2 1 0.3 8.8 i 9.8 6.8 i 9.4 .6.4 i 9.6 44 6.2 i 1.5 5.9 i 9.3 7.0 1 0.4 4.710.3 6.1 1 0.4. 6.2 1 0.3 7.4 i 8.4 5.6 i 9.4 6.7 i 9.4 5.8 1 0.3 7,.3 i 9.3 6.2 i 9.3 5.8 1 0.5 45 6.9 1 1.5 6.6 i 0.2 7.7 i 0.8 5.4 1 0.6 6.5 1 0.6' 6.8 2 0.5 7.8 1 0.6 6.318.6'7.4i9.7 6.8 1 9.4. 8.1 1 9.5 7.9 1 9.5 4.6 i 9.4 ' 46 6.4 i 1.5 6.2 1 0.1 7.1 i 0.3 4.9 i 0.4 6.1 1 9.7 6.2 i 9.3 7.5 i 9.7 5.9 i 9.3 7.2 i 9.6 6.5 i 9.5 .7.5 i 9.2 6.2 1 9.4 6.1 1 0.3 47 7.4 i 1.5 7.0 i 0.3 8.9 1 0.5 5.8 i 0.8 7.4 i 9.6 7.4 1 0.3 8.5 i 9.5 6.8 i 9.7 8.9 1 1.9 7.2 i 9.7- 8.6 1 9.6 . 7.2 1 9.3' 7.'1 1 0.6 i. ~ 48 6.8 2 1.4 6.5 i O.2 .7.5 i 0.5 5.8 i 9.5 .6.4 2 9.6 6.3 i 9.4 7.9 1 0.5 6.2 1 9.4 7.3 1 9.3 6.6 i 9.4 "7.9 i 9.5 6.8 1 0.6 6.3 1 9.4 49 6.8 1 1.6 6.6 i 0.6 7.8 i 0.2 5.6 i 0.6 5.9 1 0.4 - 6.2 1 8.4 ~7.5 i 0.5 6.2 1 9.4 7.3 1 9.3. 6.9 i 9.5 8.1 1 9.6 7.1 1 0.5 .6.3 i 9.6 53 7.5 i 1.8 7.3 1 0.4 8.4 i 0.5 5.8 i 9.3 7.2 i 9.3 7.3 i 9.8-'8.9 1 9.8 6.4 i 9.2 7.9 1 9.2 .7.7 1 0.7 8.9 i 9.6. 7.3 1 9.4 7.4 i 9.5 51 7.0 i 1.6 "7.1 1 0.8 7.6 i 9.6 "5.6 2 1.0 6.4 1 0.2 6.8 i 9.4 8.2 1 0.5 6.3 1 0.9..7.5 i 1.1 '6.9 i 9.7 8.2 i 9.8 7.1 1 9.4. 6.5 1 0.5 I i'
- 1. MEAN M4D TWO TIMES THE STMBARD DEVIATICH OF THE Mut*THLY, RESULTS.
t O"'r"___.___________._t__"'
$i- " ' ' "
+7
"I ' " ' % T# 6"*T N '
Y l d E #7 * ' Y '# # "W Y ' ' " OY I' *#^ Y '" "' # . "
.- .. - . . - ~. . .. . -. .. --
.T E l I
TA8LE C.XI.2 EUAPTtplY TLD PESULTD FOR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION.1969 ' ' RESULTS IN 04ITS OF MILLI.pODfiEDVSTO. MO. t 8. S.D. , STAT 10H MEW 4 2 JW4-MAR APR JW4 JUL.SEP OCT.DEC CODE 2 S.D.11) I'- ....... .......... .......... .......... .......... ..........
-1A 6.6 1 2.2 5.3 1 0.1 6.1 1 0.3 7.6 1 0.7 7.5 1 0.3 i
I 5.3 1 1.4 4.4 2 0.2 5.310.3 6.1 1 0.2 5.2 1 0.2 1B 1C 6.4 1 1.4 5.6 1 0.3 6.4 1 0.5 6.4 2 0.6 7.3 1 0.4 10 5.5 1 0.0 5.3 2 0.2 5.1 1 0.3 5.8 1 0.3 5.9 1 0.2 15 6.011.6 5.0 t V.3 6.2 1 0.5 5.7 2 0.3 7.1 1 0.3 1F 6.6 1 1.0 6.2 1 0.5 6.1 2 0.5 7.0 1 0.6 7.0 1 0.4 10 4.4 1 0.7 3.9 1 0.1 4.610.3-4.710.1 4.5 1 0.1 1H 6.011.9 5.3 1 0.2 5.4 1 0.4 5.9 1 0.3 7.4 1 0.3 -- i I II 1J 5.121.7-4.310.2 (2) 5.0 1 0.2 6.0 2 0.1-6.921.9 6.3 1 0.3 6.0 1 0.8 7.1'1 0.5 6.1 1 0.7" i IL 3.7 2 1.2 2.0 2 0.1 3.7 1 0.2 4.0 1 0.1 4.2 1 0.3 iM 3.0 1 1.4 3.0 1 0.0' 3.8 2 0.1 3.5 1 0.0' 4.7 1 0.3 , t 5.0 1 1.6 5.2 1 0.3 5.310.3 5.0 1 0.5 6.910.4 3A 4.4 1 1.4 3.7 1 0.1 4.3 1 0.2 4.2 1 0.1 5.4 1 0.4 4K 4.6 1 1.4 3.6 2 0.2 5.0 2 0.9 4.3 1 0.3 5.3 2 0.2 I 7.2 1 0.7 L 5 5.9 2 1.6 5.1 2 0.2 5.7 1 0.3 5.7 1 0.4 60 5.2 1 1.9 4.3 2 0.2 5.0 1 0.3 5.0 1 0.2 6.6 1 0.5
)
it04 6.7 2 0.6 6.5 2 0.4 6.2 1 0.5 7.0 1 0.5 7.1 1 0.5 I 14 120 6.2 2 1.8 5.3 1 0.3 6.1 1 0.4 6.0 2 0.4 7.5 1 0.3 4.710.7 4.310.1 4.9 2 0.3 4.5 2 0.2 5.0 1.0.3 15 6.4 1 1.4 5.7 1 0.3 6.4 2 0.5 '6.3 2 0.4 7.4 1 0.4 16 6.4 1 1.9 5.5 1 0.3 6.0 2 0.5 6.4 2 0.5 7.7 1 0.6 17 7.1 1 1.2 6.5 1 0.3 7.2 1 0.4 6.e 1 0.5 7.9 1 0.6 to 6.711.3 6.0 1 0.2 6.5 2 0.5 6(10.5 7.6 1 1.1 I 1. MEAH WID TWO TIMES THE STAHDARD DEVIATION OF THE QUARTERLY RESULTS.-
- 2. SEE PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS SECTION FOR EXPLAHATICH.
I - I I l
I' I TABLE C.XI.t ' EUANTERLT TLD RESULTS FOR PEACH 60TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATI0H.1969 RESULTS IH LHITS OF MILLI.ROtHistW STD. MO. 1 2 S.0 W STATIGH Mt#41 JM4-MAR APR.AAl JUL.SEP OCT.DEC COOL 2 S.D. 11) -
....... .......... .......... .......... ..........z..........
19- 6.5 1 1.5 5.6 1 0.3 6.4 2 0.2 6.710.4 7.410.5 20 5.4 1 1.4- 4.7 2 0.1 5.420.4 5.310.3:.6.410.7 tto 6.2 1 0.7 5.7 2 0.2 6.4 1 0.6 6.4 2 0.5 6.2 1 0.2 22 6.6 4 1.5 5.9 1 0.2 6.9 2 0.7 6.5 2 0.2 7.7 1 0.6 23 6.3 1 1.4 6.1 1 0.2 5.6 1 0.2: 6.4 2 0.5 7.3 1 0.2- W 24 5.1 2 1.1 4.6 1 0.1 5.3 1 0.3 4.6 1 0.2 5.6 2 0.6 26 6.6 1 0.6 6.t 2 0.3.7.0 1 1.2 6.920.5 7.0 2 1.4 ~ 27 6.6 1 1.4 6.0 1 0.3- 6.5 2 0.5 6.5 2 0.5 7.6 2 0.6 31 5.7 1 1.0 '5.7 1 0.3 -5.0 1 0.4 5.9 1.0.2 6.2 1 0.2 6.6 1 0.4 -7.9 1 0.6
~
32 7.011.5 6.1 1 0.3 7.3 1 0.5 33A 4.5 2 1.0 -4.3 1 0.2 3.920.1'5.010.4 4.610.2 36 6.6 1 1.5 6.1 1 0.3 7.0 2 0.5 6.5 1 0.5 7.6 1 0.6 40 6.7 2 1.5 6.1 2 0.3 6.1 1 0.2 7.5 1 0.6- 7.2 2 0.6 42 6.4 1 1.1 6.9 2 0.4- 5.7 1 0.2i 6.4 1 0.2 6.7 1 0.5 g i 43 7.0 1 1.9 6.5 1 0.4 6.3 1 0.6 6.9 1 0.4- 6.4 1 0.9 ! 44 5.6 1 0.5 5.4 1 0.4 6.0 1 0.5 5.92'0.3 5.9 1 0.3 45 6.6 1 1.7 '6.2 2 0.4 6.610.5.6.320.5 6.0 1 0.6 46 5.6 1 1.0 5.4 2 0.2 5.1 1 0.3 6.0 1 0.4 6.1 1 0.3 47 7.0 1 0.6 6.6 1 0.3 7.0 1 0.6 7.3 1 0.4- 7.1 1 0.5 q 46 6.2 1 1.4 7.0 1 0.3 5.3 1 0.4 6.1 1 0.4 6.5 2 0.2 .,, i 49 6.5 1 2.4 6.9 1 0.2 5.1 1 0.5 6.2 2 0.4 6.0 1 0.5 " 50 7.0 t 1.4 7.9 1 0.4 6.3 2 0.5 7.3 1 0.5 6.7 2 0.4 51 6.9 1 1.6 6.4 1 0.4 6.6 1 0.5 '6.7 1 0.5 6.1 1 0.9 -
- 1. MEAH AHO Tbc TIMES THE STANDARD DEVIATION OF THE IlUARTERLY RESULTS.
Il 3 3
.. _ . _ . . ~ . . _ . . . -- . . - . - _ . . _ . _ . . . .__
i TABLE C.XI.3 MEAN TLD RESULTS FOR THE PEACH 00TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION . SITE 80LNDARY. MIDOLE. AND OUTER RIHBSs 1969
-i
~
RESULTS IN WITS OF MILLI.ROEHisEWSTD. PC.
- 2 STANDARD DEVIATIONS !
up 0F THE STATIQH DATA EXPOSJRE SITE MIDDLE RING OJTER RING SAMPLE TTPE PERIOD
- I.. ............
MONTHLY JAH 1969 FEB 1969 6.0 t 2.2 6.9 2 f.6 6.4 1 1.7 7.3 2 1.6< 6.1 1 1.6 6.6 1 1.6 i
-- c HAR 1969 5.0 t 2.4 5.2 2 l.6 5.1 1 0.9 '
I APR 1969 MAY 1969 Jtki 1969 JUL 1969 6.0 t 2.3. 6.0 $ t.6 7.3 1 2.3 5,7 2 t.3 6.3 2 1.5 6.4 1 1.6 7.7 1 1.5 6.0 1 1.5. 6.0 2 1.3 5.6 1 1.6
.7.3 2 2.6 5.711.3 '
AUG 1969 6.7 1 2.4 7.221.6- 6.721.9 6.5 1 1.6 6.4 2 1.6 I- SEP 1969 OCT 1969 IEW 1969 6.212.4-
.7,0 $ t.3 6.2 1 2.3
.7.621.6-6.5 2 1.5 7.5 t 2.0 6.3 1.1.5, s.l "
DEC 1969 5.6 1 2.1 6.21.1.6' 5.6 1 0.9 l l
- 9) ART 2RLY JAH. MAR 1969 5.0 t 2.4 5.6 1 2.0 5.2 1 1.3 ;
APR.JLN 1969 5.4 2 1.0 6.0 1 1.9 5.o 2 1.3' l JUL.SEP 1969 5.9 2 2.4 6.211.6- - 5.6 1 1.6 6.4 2 2.6 7.0 2.1.9 6.61-2.0, OCT.DEC 1969
'f TABLE C.XI.4 lu91ARY OF THE APSIENT DOSIMETRY PROGRAM POR ~
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIOHe.1969 RESULTS IN LHITS OP MILLI.ROENTSEWSTD. MO. - PERIOD- iPRE.0P- :1 MEAN MEAN 4 SAMPLE j TYPE LOCATION - HO.ANALYZED OF SAMPLES MINDEM ~ PERIOD-MAPDtM- PaIOD . .t 2 .1 S.D... 2 S.D.1( l )
............ ............ .............. ....... '2.6 ....... ...........
6 . .'
- 6.222.6. 5.322.2-MOHTHLY SITE 156 6.0 t 2.0 MIDDLE RING 100 3.5 .9.1 6.612.1.
CUTER RING 64 4.1 9.6 6.3 1 2.1 6.2 1 1.4 QUARTERLY SITE 52 2.6 6.1 5.7 t 2.5 ' :5.4 1 1.7 . MIDDLE RING 100 3.7 6.4 6.2
- t.1- 5.311.3 =
l i OUTER RING to 4.3 7.7 5.9 2 1.9' '5.7 1 1.6 .q I l l l l l l' l t1) THE PRE. OPERATIONAL MEAN MAS CALCULATED PROM TLD READIHe51/07/73 TO 6/05/73. STATIONS 1Me 31 AND 32 WERE ADDED TO THE PRNRAM 7/06/73 AND STATI0HS 33A AND 36 NERE HDT IN THE. PRE.OPERATICHAL HOGRAM.
.)
l l STATIONS it+1 AND 40 THROUGH 51 WERE ADDED TO THE PROGRAM Q107/12/60 SITE BOLNDARY RING STATIONS 1B,1C 1De 1 E . 1 P , 16, 1H e 14. 1Le iMe 1FNs te AFW 40 l l-MIDDLE RING STATIONS 3A 4K e 5, 66, 14. 15. 17. 22, 13. 26,
- 27. 31,'32, 33A. 36. 42, 43, 44, 45, 46.
47, 46, 49, 50, 51. i OLTTER R1HG STATICHS 120, 16, 16. 19. 20, 215 '24 I J l 1 I t I
, , , , e m -. , em- ...-e w - an
I 11, ' TABLE C.XII,1 ~ Su91ARY OF COLLECTICH DATtt POR SAMPLt$ COLLECTt0 D4 THt'- VICD(ITY OF PEACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATICH: 1969 ll SURFACUDRDe(Die NATER. (880$$ ALPHA, OROS$ DETA AND GAP 91A1,
...................... -)
(I COLLECTICH- -134 136 I Lt - - tm - 4L. 61. i PERIOC- 3. t JMI 69 02/04 02/M 01/27 01/27 12/30 02/03' 1t/30 02/03 - i t/31 02/M - 12/31 02/04 _ - 7 FEB 09' 03/04 03/04 02/17 02/17 0 U03 03/03 02/03 03/03 -02/04 03/04 OUO4 03/04: :.
-. MAR 69 M/02 04/02 03/23 0V23 03/05 0V31 03/03 03/31 03/04 03/25' 03/04.M/02 l APR 69 05/07 05/07 04/20.M/20 03/31 05/05 03/31 05/05- 04/02 05/07i .04/02 05/07-~ .,
MAY 69J - 06/04 06/M 06/01 06/01 05/05 06/02' 05/05 0 U02. 05/07 06/M - 05/07 0 U05 t
# 1 69 06/24.M/24 06/24 06/24 06/02 06/23 06/02 06/23 06/M.06/24 06/04 06/24-JUL 69 :06/05 06/05 07/26 07/26 06/23 07/26 M/23 07/26 06/24 07/29 06/24 07/29 !
AUG 69 06/26 0W 26 06/16 06/16- 07/26 06/15 07/26 06/25 07/29 06/26- 07/29 06/26 '; SEP 69' 09/30 09/30 09/30 09/30 06/25 09/t9- 06/25 09/29 06/26 09/30' 06/26 09/30-OCT 69 11/05 1t/05' 11/05 11/05 09/29 11/03 . 09/29 11/03, 09/30 11/05- 09/30 11/05' i HOV 69 1 U O3 1t/03- 12/0I.12/01' 11/03 1U01 1 t/03 12/01 11/05 12/03 11/05 12/03 m DEC 69- 01/07 01/07 12/21 12/21 1 U 01 01/05 t uel.01/05 12/03-01/07 1 UO3 01/07 . SURFACE /0RDED40 NAT!R ' ITRITIUN) ! COLLECTIOH' 13A 1135 I LL' 1m : - 4LL 4%. - PERIOO, c
.......... ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. ............. p JMi-MAR 69 02/04 M/02 12/30 03/31 12/30 0V31 12/31 03/25 12/31. M/02 t .APR.JUH 69 05/07 06/24' 03/31 06/23 03/31 06/23 - M/02 0Vf4 M/02 06/24 :
l JUL.SEP 69 06/05 09/30 06/23 09/29- M/23 09/29 -06/24 09/30 L06/24 09/30 (: OCT.0EC 69' 11/05 01/07 09/29 01/05 ; 09/19 01/05 - 09/30 01/07 09/30 01/07-ORD6: DIG MATER - (I.131) I + 4 COLLECTION PERIOD 4L - 61 I, ' JAH 69 -Ot/27 0 U D4 01/28 0 U M FEB 69 02/25 03/04- 02/25 03/04 : MAR 69 M/02 M/03 03/24.M/02 > APR 89 05/06 05/06 - 04/29 (5/07 l l MAY 69 05/27 06/04 06/05 06/05 ' M169 06/17 06/24 06/24 06/24 JUL 69 07/29 06/05 06/05 06/05
- AUG 69 06/16 06/26 06/20 06/26 SEP 69 09/23 09/30. 09/23 09/30 OCT 69 11/05 11/05 10/20 11/05 NOV 89 11/25.t uo3 1 UO6.l t/M '
I I' I lF 4
- _ . . - - - _ , ,..-.s_ , _. , ,
r I' I . TABLE C.XII.1 St.99%RY OF COLLECTION DATE9 POR SAMPLES COLLECTte D41rit - VICINITY OF PEACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 1969 I AIR PARTICULATES & AIR 100!HE GROUP I - SITE BOUHDARY LOCATIGHS MttK # B OR MTH. COMP. 1A 18 1Z. ,t-i 12/31-01/07 1U3 t =01/07 1 U3t=01/07 12/31 01/07 I JAH 69 2 3 01/07-01/14 01/07-01/14 01/14 01/21. '01/14 01/21 01/21 01/27' 01/21-01/27 12/31-01/27 1*/31
. 01/27 01/07-01/14 01/14-01/21 01/21-01/27 01/07-01/14 01/14-01/21:
01/21-01/27 12/31 01/27' 1 5 01/27 0 U O4- 01/27-02/04 01/27-0 UD4 - 01/27-0t/04 6 0U04-02/11- 02/04 0 U11-- DUO 4-0U11 02/04-02/11 31 7 02/11 0 U17 02/11-0 U17. 02/t1-02/17 0U11-02/17 - 0 02/17-02/15- O U17-Ot/25> SU17-0U25 - O U17-Ot/25-01/27 0Ut5! PtB 69 Ot/27 0Uts '- . 01/27 0 Uf5 9 02/25-03/04 .02/25-03/04- OU25 03/M Ot/25-03/M
-I -
10
'11
,03/04 03/11-03/11-03/to-03/04 03/111 03/11-03/16 03/M-03/t l
-03/11 0V16 03/04-03/11 OV11 03/16 12 03/10-03/t5 03/16 03/25 03/16 03/25 03/16-03/25 I
13 03/25-04/02 03/25-04/02- - 03/25-M/02 03/25-M/02
= MAR 69 ' 02/25-04/02 02/25 04/02- -
Ot/25-M/02 ' 14 M/02-M/06 04/02-M/06 - M/02.M/06 04/02-M/06 , 15 M/06-M/16 C4/06-M/16 M/06-04/16 M/06.M/16 16- 04/16 04/22 04/16-04/22 04/16 04/22 M/16.M/22 17 M/22 04/30 M/22.M/30 ' M/tt 04/30 ~ 04/22 04/30: 5 APR 69-16
- M/02 04/30 04/30-05/07-04/02.M/30 04/30 05/07- 04/30 05/07 04/02-04/30-04/30-05/07 -i
{ 19' 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13- 05/07 05/13 05/07-05/13 ' ! 20 05/13 05/21 05/13 05/21 05/13 05/21 :05/13 05/21 . 21 05/21-05/27 05/21-05/27 05/21-05/27' .C5/tt-05/27' + M/30 05/27 M/30 05/27
~
MAY 69 04/30 05/27' 22 05/27 06/04 05/27-06/04 05/17-06/04 05/27-06/04-23 06/04 06/11 M/ M-06/11 06/04-06/11 06/04 06/11 24 06/11-06/17 06/11 06/17 06/11-06/17- 06/11-06/17 25 -06/17-06/24 06/17-06/24 06/17-M/24 06/17-06/24
'5- 26 06/24 07/01 06/24-07/01 06/24 07/01 06/24-07/01 JUN 69 05/27-07/01 05/27 07/01 .
05/27-07/01 27 07/01-07/09 07/01-07/09 07/01-07/09- 07/01-07/09 ! to 07/09-07/15 07/09-07/15 07/09-07/15 07/09-07/15' 29 07/15 07/21' 07/15 07/21 07/15-07/21 07/15-07/21 30 07/21-07/29 07/21-07/29 07/21-07/19 - - 07/21-07/29 JUL 69 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29- 07/01-07/29 07/29-06/0* 07/29-06/05 I 31 07/29-06/05 07/29-06/05 , 06/05-06/11 06/05-06/11 06/05 06/11 06/05-06/11 32 33 06/11-06/16 06/11-06/16: 06/11-06/16 06/11 06/16 34 06/16-06/26 06/16-06/26 06/16-06/26- ~ 06/16 06/26 . AUG 69 07/29 06/26 07/29-06/26 . 07/29-06/26 ! 35 06/26-09/01 06/26 09/01 06/26-09/01 '06/ M-09/01 36 09/01-09/06 .09/01-09/06 09/01-09/06 09/01-09/06 37 09/06 09/15 09/03-09/15 09/06-09/15 09/06-09/15 36 09/15-09/23 09/15-09/23 09/15-09/23 09/15-09/23 SEP 69 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 I i 39 09/23 09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23 09/30 40 09/30-10/07 09/30-10/07 09/30-10/07 09/30-10/07 41 10/07-10/13 10/07-10/13 10/07 10/13 10/07-10/13- i 10/13 10/21 10/13-10/21 10/13-10/21' 42 10/13-10/21 I 43 10/21 10/27 10/21-10/27 10/21 10/27 10/21-10/27 OCT 69 09/23-10/27 09/23-10/27 09/23-10/27 , l 44 10/27-11/05 10/27-11/05 10/27-11/05' 10/27-11/05 > ! 45 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11. 11/05-11/11 46 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 I HOV 89 47 46 49 11/17-11/25 11/25-12/03 10/27-1 UO3 1 UO3-12/09 11/17-11/25 11/25-1 UO3 10/27-1 UO3 12/03-12/09 11/17-11/25 11/25-1 UO3 12/03-1UO9 11/17-11/25 10/27-1UO3 12/03-12/09 50 1UO9-12/16 12/09-12/17 1UO9-12/16 1UO9-1U17 I J 51 12/16 1 U23 12/17-t u23 12/16-1 U23 12/17-12/23 52 1 U23-12/29 12/23-12/29 1U23-lu29 12/23-12/29 DEC 69 1 UO3-1 U29 12/03-12/29 1UO3-tU29 I
Il TA6Lt C-XII.1 SWMARY OF COLLECT 10H DATES FOR SAMPLES' COLLECTED IN THE , VICDl!TY OF PEACH 60TTOM ATOMIC MMER STATION 1969 ; i AIR PARTICULATts & AIR 100Det
. GROUP 1,1 - INT 2RMCDIATE DISTANCE LOCATIONS ' 1 WitK #
OR NTH, COMP 3A 46 5 66 14 15z 1- 12/31 01/07 12/31 01/07- 12/31 01/07 lu31-01/07 12/31-01/07-- .; 2' 01/07 01/14 01/07-01/14 01/07-01/14 01/07-01/14 01/07-01/14- 01/07-01/14; i 3 01/l4-Ol/21 01/14 01/21 01/14-01/21- 01/14-01/21 01/14 01/211 01/14-01/21- t 4 01/21-01/27 '01/21-01/27 01/21-01/26 - 01/21-01/26 01/21-01/26- 01/21-01/26 - - JAH 69 12/31-01/27 1 U31 01/27' 12/31-01/27- tt/31-01/26- 1U31-01/26 12/31-01/26 .y 5 01/t7-02/04 01/t7-0&M 01/26-Ot/ M 01/26-02/ M 01/26-02/ M 01/26=0UM = ' ' 6 0UD4-0U11 02/04-02/11 02/04-0Uti 02/04-Ou11- " 02/04-02/11- OUM-02/11 ! < 7 02/11-0U17L '02/11-02/17 O U11-02/16. 02/11-0 U16 02/11-02/16 02/11-02/16 .
.. l 6 O u17-02/25 , O U17-0?/25 02/16-02/25' OU16 0u25 = 02/16 02/25 .02/16-0 U25 P2B 09 01/27-0 U 25 01/27-02/25 01/20 02/25- 01/20 02/25 01/26-0 U25^ 01/26-02/25 ,
9 ~ 02/25-03/04 02/25-03/04 .02/25-03/04 02/25 03/04= Ou25-0VM O u25-03/04' 10 03, M-03/11 03/04 03/11 03/04-03/111 03/M-03/11 - 03/M-03/1 S -- 03/M-03/11 :1 11 03/11-03/16 03/11 03/16' O V11-03/l8 03/11-03/16- 03/11-03/16 03/11-03/16 ' 12 03/16 03/25 03/16-03/25' O Vto-03/24 03/16-03/24- : 03/16-03/24 03/16-03/24 , . 13 OV25-M/02 03/25-M/02 '03/24- W 02 03/24-04/02; 03/24-M/02 03/24-04/02' ! MAR 69 02/25- W O2 02/25-M/02 02/25-04/02- 02/25-04/02. 02/25-04/02 'OU25 04/02 ~ i 14 - 04/02-M/06 M/02-04/06 04/02- W O6 - W O2-04/06 '04/02-04/06' M/02-04/06 9 15' - M/06 04/16 M/06-04/16 M/06-M/t 5 04/06- W 15' M/06-04/tB' : 04/06-M/15 16 M/16 04/22 04/16 04/22 M/15-M/22 ; 04/15-04/22 J04/15-04/22< - W 15 04/22. 17 W22 M/30 M/22-04/30 W 22-04/29 M/22-04/29 04/22-04/29 04/22-04/29L APR 69 M/02 04/30 ' WO2-M/30 04/02-04/29. M/02-04/29 -04/02-04/29, . W O2-04/29 f 16- M/30-05/07 W 30-05/071 .04/29-05/07~ 04/29 05/07: 04/29-05/07- M/29 05/07 ; 19 -05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13 05/07-Pr i3- 05/07-05/13y 05/07-05/t3~ ? 20- 05/13-05/21 05/13-05/21 '05/13-05/20. 05/13=,o/20- <05/13 05/20 05/13-05/20. 21 05/21-05/27 05/21 05/27- 05/20-05/27' 05/20-05/27r 05/20-05/27 E05/20-05/27- . [ , MAY 69 04/30-05/27- 04/30 05/27 04/29-05/27 05/07-05/27- M/29-05/27 : M/29 05/27. - 22 05/27 06/04 05/27-06/04 05/27 06/M- 05/27-06/04 05/27-06/04. 05/27 06/04. )[ 23 06/04 06/11 06/M-06/t t 06/M-06/10 06/04-06/10 06/04-06/10 -06/04 06/10- - 24 '06/11-06/17 06/11-06/17 06/10-M/16- .06/10-06/16 06/10 06/16. 06/10-06/16 'l-lz 25 06/17-06/24 06/17-M/24 06/16-06d 4' 06/16 06/242 06/16-06/24 06/16-06/24 L' 26 06/24-07/01 06/24-07/01 06/24-07/01 06/24-07/011 06/24-07/01 06/24-07/01- .
,Aki 69 05/27-07/01 05/27 07/01 05/27-07/01- 05/27-07/01x -05/27-07/01' ~05/27 07/01 27 07/01-07/09- 07/01-07/09 07/01-07/09' 07/01-07/06 07/01-07/06 07/01-07/06' j to 07/09-07/15 07/09 07/15- 07/09-07/15 07/06-07/15 '07/06-07/15 :07/06-07/15 ': '
29 07/15-07/21 07/15-07/21. - 07/15-07/22 07/15 07/22. 07/15-07/22 07/15-07/22 30 07/21-07/29 07/21-07/29 07/22-07/29- 07/22-07/293 07/22-07/29. 07/22-07/29 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29 JUL 69 07/01-07/291 07/01-07/29- C7/01 -07/2 9 - 31 07/29-06/05 07/29-06/05 07/29-06/05' -07/29-06/05' 07/29-06/05 07/29 06/05 32 06/05-06/11 06/05-06/11 '06/05-06/12- 06/05-06/12: 06/05-06/12 06/05-06/12 33 06/11-06/16 06/11-06/16 06/12 06/20- .06/12-06/20 06/12-06/20 06/12-06/20 34 06/16-06/26 06/16-06/26 .06/20 06/26- 06/20-06/26- 06/20-06/26' 06/20-06/26 , AUG 69 07/29-06/26 07/29-06/26 07/29-06/26 07/29-06/26 07/29-06/261 07/29-06/26 4 35 06/26 09/01. 06/26-09/01- 06/26-09/01- 06/26-09/01 -06/26 09/01 06/26-09/01 36 09/01-09/06 09/01-09/06 09/01 09/10 09/01 09/10 09/01-09/10 09/01-09/10-37 09/06-09/15 09/06-09/15 09/10 09/16 .09/10-09/16' .09/10 09/16 09/10-09/10 ; 36 09/15-09/23 09/15-09/23- 09/16-09/23- 09/16-09/23- 09/16-09/23 '09/16-09/23-SEP 69 - '06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 '06/26-09/23- 06/26-09/23- 06/26-09/23' 39 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30 09/23-09/30- < 40 09/30-10/07 . -09/30 10/07 09/30 10/07 '09/30-10/07 09/30-10/07 41 10/07-10/13 10/07-10/13 10/07-10/14 10/07-10/14> 10/07-10/14 10/07-10/14- , 42 10/13-10/21 10/13-10/21 10/14-10/21 10/14-10/21- 10/14-10/21 10/14-10/21 + 43 10/21-10/27- 10/21-10/27 10/21-10/26 10/21-10/26. 10/21-10/26- 10/21-10/28 . 4 OCT 69 09/23-10/27 09/23-10/27 09/23-10/26 09/23-10/26 09/23 10/26 09/23-10/28 : 44 10/27-11/05 10/27 11/05 10/26.I1/05 . 10/26 11/05 - 10/26-11/05 10/26-11/05 - I' 45 ' 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 -11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 [ 46 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17- 11/11-11/17- 11/11 11/17 11/11-11/17 47 11/l7-11/25 11/17-11/25 -11/17-11/25 11/17-11/25 11/17-11/25 11/17-11/25 46 11/25 1UO3 11/25-1U03 11/25-1UO3 11/25-1U03- 11/25-1U03 - 11/25-1 UO3 HDV 69 10/27-1UP ~ 10/27-1 UO3 10/26-1 UO3 10/26-1U03 10/26-1 UO3 10/26-1 UO3 49 12/03-12/0v 12/03-12/09 l u 03-12/09 1UO3-12/09 12/03-12/09 12/03-12/09 r 50 1 UO 9-12/16 12/09-12/16 12/09-1 U17 12/09-12/17 1 U09-12/17 12/09-1 U17 . 51 1U16-1U23 1 U16-1 U23 12/17-12/23 1 U17-1 U23 1 U17-12/23 -1 U17-12/23 52 1 U23-1U29 1 U23-12/29 1 U23-12/30 12/23-1 U 30 12/23-1 U30 12/23-12/30 , DEC 69 12/03-1U29 1 UO3-12/29 12/03-12/30 1UO 3-1U30 1 UO3-1 U30 1UO3-12/30 t
..____1_____2. .._.: . . _ .
.f I i j, ASLE C M I.1 SLOHARY OF COLLECTIoH DATES FOR SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH 90TitM ATOMIC POWER STATICH, t 969
- g AIR PARTICULATES C AIR 100Det 3 GWOUP II - INTERMt01 ATE DISTANCE LOCATICHS GROUP III - DISTANT' LOCATIONS IWttK# OR -
PffH i C &tP. 17- 31 32 '- 33A 36 L '120
---.----- ;---- 1;.
1 12/31 01/07. 12/31-01/07 12/31 01/07 .1 U31 01/07 1t/31 01/07- '01/03-01/09 I<2 -JAN 69 3 4-01/07 01/14 01/14-01/21-01/21-01/26 12/31a01/26 01/07 01/14 01/14-01/21-01/21-01/26 12/31-01/26 01/07 01/14 01/14-01/21 01/21 01/26 t u31 01/26 01/07-01/14 01/14-01/21 01/21 01/26 12/31-01/26 01/07-01/14 01/14-01/21 01/21-01/261 12/31-01/26J 01/09-01/17 01/17-01/23, Ot/23-Ot/30L 01/03 01/30;
- 5. 01/26-02/M 01/26 02/04 01/26-02/04 01/26-02/M 01/26 02/04 01/30 02/27 6, OU04-02/11 ,02/04-02/11: 02/04-02/11' 02/04-02/11" 02/ M-02/11 02/07-02/13-OU13-02/21 7 02/11 02/16 02/11-02/16 02/11-02/16 02/11 02/to- '02/11-02/16- t 6 02/16-02/25 02/16-0U25 - 02/16 02/15 02/16-02/25' 02/16-02/25 02/21-0 U27_ -
~t FE6 69 ,01/26-02/25 01/26-02/25 01/26-02/25 01/26-0U25 01/26-02/25 01/30 02/07 ,
9' O U25 03/04 02/25 03/04 02/25 03/04 02/25 03/04 .0 V25 03/04 02/27-03/06
.I . ' 10 -
11 ' OV04-03/11 03/11-03/16 03/04-03/11. 03/11 03/16 03/04-03/11. 03/11-03/16 0F04-03/11 03/11-03/16 03/04-0 V111 l03/11-03/16 03/06-03/131 63/13-03/20 . ' 12 03/16 03/24 -03/16 03/24 03/16-03/24 03/16-03/24 '03/16-03/24 03/20-03/27/ f' 03/24-04/02 .03/24- W 02- 03/24 04/02 ~ 03/t4-04/02 '03/24- W O2. 03/27-04/03 I 13 MAR 69 02/25-DV02 . : 02/25 04/02 02/25-M/02 .. 02/25-04/02- 02/25 04/02, 02/27-04/03 ; 14 04/02-04/06 04/02-04/06 04/02-04/06' 04/02-04/06 04/02-04/06- M/03-W t 0 -! 15 M/06-04/15 ' M/06-M/15 04/06-04/15 04/06-04/15 04/06-04/15 04/10-04/17- l 16 04/15-04/22~ ~ M/15-04/22 04/15 04/22 i 04/15-04/22 04/15-04/22 04/17-M/24 J ,
. 17 04/22-04/29- 04/22-M/29 04/22-04/29 W 22-04/29 04/22-0V29 - 04/24-05/02 '
- APR 69 W O2-04/29- 04/02-04/29 - W O2-04/29 04/02 W 29 04/02-04/29 M/03-05/02 to 04/29-05/07 04/29-05/07 04/29 05/07. '04/29-05/07. M/29 05/07 , _05/02-05/06 )
19- 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13 05/07-05/13) 05/06-05/15 ' et 20 05/l3 05/20 05/l3-05/20' -05/13-05/20 05/13-05/20: 05/13-05/20! 05/15-05/22 21 05/20-05/27 05/20-05/27 05/20-05/27 05/20 05/27 05/20-05/27 05/22-05/30 R MAY 69 22 04/29 05/27 05/27-06/M M/29-05/27 05/27-06/04 04/29-05/27 05/27-06/M 04/29-05/27' 04/29-05/27c 05/27-06/M - '05/27-0U 04
,05/02 05/30 05/30-06/05 23 06/M-06/10 06/04-06/10 06/04-06/10 06/04-06/10 06/04-06/10 06/05-06/12 i 06/10-06/16 06/10 06/16 06/10-06/16 .06/10-06/16 06/10-06/16 06/12-06/19 24 I- JLN 69 25 26
'06/16 06/24 06/24 07/01 05/27-07/01 06/16 06/24 06/24-07/01 05/27 07/01:
06/16 06/24 06/24-07/01' 05/27 07/01 06/16 06/24 06/24-07/01 06/16 06/24 06/24-07/01-05/27-07/01- '05/27-07/01 06/19-06/26' 06/26-07/03-05/30-07/03-t 27 07/01-07/06 07/01-07/06 07/01-07/06 -07/01-07/06 '07/01-07/06E 07/03-07/10 > 26 07/06-07/15 07/06-07/15 07/06-07/15 07/06-07/15- -07/06-07/15; 07/10-07/17' i 29 07/15 07/22 07/15-07/22 07/15-07/22 07/15-07/22 07/15-07/22 07/17-07/24: [ 30 07/22-07/29 07/22-07/29 07/22-07/29 07/22-07/29 07/22-07/29: 07/24-07/31
- JUL 69 ' 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29 07/01-07/29 -07/01-07/29 07/03-07/31 ,
07/29-06/05 07/29-06/05 07/29 0W 05 07/29-06/05 07/29-06/05 07/31-06/06 I 31 32 0W05-06/12 06/05-06/12 06/05-06/12- 06/05-06/12 06/06-06/14 33 06/12-06/20 06/12-06/20 06/12-06/20 06/12-06/20' 06/12-06/20:' 06/14-06/21 34 06/20-06/26 06/20-06/26 06/20-06/26 06/20 06/26 06/20-06/26: '06/21 06/26 AUG 69 07/29-0W26 07/29 06/26 07/29-06/26 07/29-06/26- ,07/29-06/26 -07/11 06/26 I 35 36 37 36 06/26-09/01 09/01-09/10 09/10-09/16 09/16-09/23 06/26-09/01 09/01-09/10 09/10-09/16 09/16-09/23 06/26 09/01 09/01-09/10 09/10-09/16 09/16-09/23 06/26-09/01' 09/01-09/10 09/10-09/16 09/16-09/23 06/26-09/01 09/01-09/10 09/10 09/16 09/16-09/23~ 06/28-09/05
~ 09/05-09/11 09/11-09/16 09/16-09/25
+
S2P 69 '0W26 09/23 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23 06/26-09/23' 06/26-09/25 I 39 40 41 42 09/23-09/30 09/30-10/07 10/07-10/14 10/14 10/21 09/23-09/30 09/30-10/07 10/07-10/14 10/14-10/21 09/23-09/30 09/30-10/07 10/07-10/14 10/14-10/21 09/23-09/30 09/30-10/07 10/07-10/14 10/14-10/21 09/23-09/30' 09/30-10/07-10/07-10/14 10/14-10/21' 09/25-10/02 10/02-10/10' 10/10-10/16 10/16-10/23
-l L
10/21-10/26 f0/21-10/26 I 43 10/21-10/28 10/21-10/28 10/21-10/26 10/23.t0/30-OCT 69 09/23-10/26 09/23-10/20 09/23-10/26 09/23-10/26 09/23 10/26 ~ 09/25-10/30 ' 44 10/26-11/05 10/26-11/05 10/26-11/05 10/26 11/05 10/26-11/05 10/30-11/06 1 45 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/05-11/11 11/06-11/13 Li 46 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/11-11/17 11/13-11/20 l I HW 69 47 46 49 11/17-11/25 11/25-12/03 10/26-1 UO 3 12/03-1 UO9 11/17-11/25 11/25-1 UO3 10/26-1 UO3 1 UO3-12/09 11/17-11/25 11/25-1 U03 10/26-1 UO3 1UO3-1UO9 10/26-11/17 11/47-11/25 11/25-12/03 10/26-12/03 1 UO3-1UO9 11/20-11/27 11/27-1U M 10/30-1 UO4 luo4-12/11 i l 50 12/09-1 U17 12/09-12/17 1UO9-1U17 1 U 09-1 U17 1U09-1U17 ' 1 U11-1 Uto 51 1 U17-1 U23 12/17-12/23 12/t7-1 U23 t ut 7-12/23 12/17-12/23 t t/10-1 U26 52 1 U23-12/30 1U23-12/30 12/23-12/30 12/23-12/30 1 U23-1 U30 12/26-01/02 1 D2C 69 1 UO3-1 U30 12/03-12/30 1 UO3-12/30 1 UO9-12/30 12/03-1 U30 1 UM-01/02 , l t
.___..__u____.____ ,A , , _ , , , -a u, s
,~ TABLE C-XII.1 SLt9%RY OF 00LLECTICRI DATES FOR SAttPLES COLLECTED IN THE
't VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOP 11C FONER STATI0ti. 1969 TLD - MutfTHLY . JAH FEB PtAR APR tuY JLD4 jut. AUG SEP OCT NOV , DEC 4
STATICR4 1969 .t969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 1969 -1969 1969 1969 1969 I ) i 1A 15 12/31-02/04 02/W83/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 e6/04-06 '24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/t6-09/30 89/30-11/05 f t/W12/03 Ue3-et/97 IC 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/ WOW 26 06/26-09/30 99/34-11/95 t t/Wtt/03 12/03-01/07 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-0VO4 OuC4-Ou24 06/24-06/05 OWO5-06/26 06/26-09/3e 99/38-11/05 11/W12/03 tus3-et/e7 !. 10 12/31-02/04 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-96/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 49/30-11/05 11/05-12/0312/03-01/07 ' . 1E l 1U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04' 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 owe 5-06/26 SW26-09/34 09/30-11/05 11/95-12/03 12/03-et/97 1F 12/39-02/04 Ouc4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 owe 5-06/26 06/26-09/34 89/30-11/95 f t/Wtue312/e3-0t/e7 1G 1U31-0UO4 0UO4-03/04 OV04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 e6/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-96/26 GW26-09/30 09/30-11/95 f t/05-f t/0312/03-41/97 -! , 1H 1U31-0UO4 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/97 05/07-OuS4 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-68/26 e6/26-09/30 09/30-1 t/05 11/W12/03 f t/ebet/07 i II 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/97-06/04 06/05-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/95-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/0511/W1US31Ue3-et/97 IJ $U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/WO6/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 4W26-09/30 09/34-11/95 11/05-12/03 12/e3-48/07 1L 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/03 Ouo3-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/W06/24 06/24-06/05 OWOS-06/26 06/26-09/38 09/30-11/95 11/05-12/03 12/03-41/07 1H 12/31-0&O4 02/04-03/04 03/04-M/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-eu24 06/24-06/05 06/05-86/26 86/26-09/3e 99/3e-11/95 11/05-12/03 12/03-01/07 _ 2 1U31-0UO4 02/04-SV04' 03/04 04/02 04/02-05/97 85/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 88/05-06/26 08/26-99/3e 09/30-11/95 11/05-12/03 12/ebet/07 3A 1U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 96/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/95 11/W12/03 12/Obet/97 4K IU31-Ouo4 0UO4-63/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 SW26-09/30 99/30-t t/05 ' t t/Wtt/03 f ue3-et/07 l 5 12/31-0UO4 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 e6/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-eW26 06/26-09/3e 09/30-s t/05 11/05-12/03 12/03-01/07 -i 68 1U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 44/02-05/07. 05/07-06/04 06/04-0U24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 96/26-09/3e 09/30-11/05 11/05-12/e312/ebet/07 tiet ' 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 0W05-06/24 eM26-09/34 09/30-11/05.11/95-12/03 12/03-01/07 - 14 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-Ou04 e6/04-06/24' 06/24-06/05 owe 5-e6/26 96/26-09/34 09/30-11/05 41/95-12/03 12/03-et/07. 120 01/03-02/07 02/07-03/06 03/06-04/03 04/03-05/02 05/02-06/05 06/05-07/06 07/06-07/31 07/31-09/05 09/05-10/02 10/02-11/06 11/96-12/91 12/11-4t/06 15 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 85/97-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/WOS/26 8W26-09/30 09/34-11/e5 11/05-12/93 12/e3-01/07 c 16 tu31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-Oue4 06/04-06/24 e6/24-86/05 06/05-06/26 eW26-09/3e 09/3e-s t/e5 11/05-12/03 12/S3-01/97 17 1U31-0UO4 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-Oue4 06/04-e6/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 f t/05-tt/03 12/03-01/07 to 19 12/31-02/04 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-eu24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 88/26-09/30 49/30-11/05 11/05-fue3 12/03-et/07 : 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06e 34 06/04-06/24 06/24 06/05 06/05-06/26 08/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 11/05-12/03 12/93-01/97 to 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-04/04 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 88/05-06/26 OW26-09/30 09/30-11/95 11/W12/03 12/03-01/07 11 216 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 83/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 9U24-0We5 88/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 99/30-t1/95 t t/WIuO3 12/03-01/07 22 tU31-0UO4 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 OV07-06/04 06/04-06/24 Ou24-0WO5 06/05-0W26 06/26-09/30 09/34-11/95 11/05-12/0312/03-01/07 23 .12/31-Ouo4 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 86/24-06/05 OWOS-eW26 eW26-09/34 99/30-11/05 f t/W12/0312/03-01/97 24 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-0We5 owe 5-06/26 06/26-09/34 09/30-11/95 11/95-12/0312/93-et/97 -! 26 12/31-02/04 02/WO3/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 e5/07-06/04 e6/04-06/24 Ou24-96/05 06/W46/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 t t/W1US312/03-01/07 . 27 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/97. 05/07-06/04 06/W66/24 06/24-0W95 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 11/W12/03 12/93-et/07 31 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/W06/24 06/24-06/05 06/We6/26 06/26-09/3e 09/30-11/05 11/W12/93 12/93-01/07 - 32 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/t% 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 C9/30-s t/05 11/05-12/03 12/03-01/97 - 334 12/3t-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/W44/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/We6/24 06/24-86/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/95 11/05-12/03 12/03-01/07 36 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-Ouo4 06/04-06/24 06/24-96/05 06/05-96/26 eW26-09/30 89/30-11/05 11/05-12/03 f ue3-01/07 - l 40 12/31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/03-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/WOU24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 11/05-12/03 12/03-4t/07 42 12/31-02/04 02/04-01/04 03/WO4/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 e6/04-06/24 46/24-06/05 06/05-06/26"0W26-09/30 09/30-11/05 11/W1UO3 12/03-01/07
~ 43 ' 1U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 e6/WOU24 06/24-06/05 06/We6/26 06/26-09/30 89/30-11/05 11/95-12/0312/03-et/97 44 12/31-0UO4 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/97 05/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 e6/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 99/30-11/05 11/05-12/0312/03-01/07 45 tu31-0UO4 02/04-03/04' 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/WOU24 06/24-06/05 06/WOS/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 '11/05-12/03 tUe3-01/97 ?I 46 1U31-02/04 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-OUO4 66/WO6/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/34 09/30-11/05 M t/05-12/03 1Ue3-et/07.. .l 47 1U31-0UO4 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 OuS4-06/24 06/24-86/05 96/05-8W26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 11/05-12/03 12/03-08/07 - J 48 12/31-02/04 OUO4-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 65/07-06/04 06/04-06/24 06/24-06/05 06/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30-11/05 1 t/05-12/03 12/03-01/97 . L 49 12/31-0UO4 02/04-03/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/97 45/07-06/04 06/W96/24 96/24-06/05 06/ WOW 26 06/26-09/36 09/30-11/05 11/05-12/03 12/03-01/07 ' -
50 S U31-02/04 02/WO3/04 03/04-04/02 04/02-05/07 05/07-06/04 06/WO6/24 06/24-06/05 46/05-06/26 06/26-09/30 09/30 11/05 11/95-12/03 12/03-01/97 ' 51 12/31-Oue4 cuWO3/04 03/04-04/02.0V02-05/07 05/67-06/04 06/04-eu24 96/24-06/05 06/We6/26 OW26-09/30 09/39-11/95 s t/05-tue3 fue3-01/07 - u
.W. mM W W M M WB ^ Mi mmM M .m; W W W .W W l
%, _. 2- 2 . _ . _ _a- - #_ . m.
._~a m . ._ m m
I . TABLE C-XII.1 SWO%RY OF COLLECTICH DATES Poe SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOPt AT@ TIC PGetR STATIW4,1969 l3 l TLD - guARTERLY ,I
--JA M 1AR APP-JLN JUL-SEP OCT-DEC STAT 131 1969 '1969 .1969 1969 i I
CODE i lA 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/t4 06/14-09/30 09/30-01/07 :1 1B 12/31-04/02 64/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 ' _i IC' it/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24 09/30 09/30-01/07 ! I tD It 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24 09/30 09/30 01/07 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 1r .12/3t-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 1G t t/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 1H 12/31-04/02 D4/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 1! 1t/31 D4/02 ., 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 8 IJ 1L 12/31-04/02 D4/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/e7 12/31-04/03 04/03-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 , 1M 1t/31-04/02 04/02-06/.24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 - { 11/31-04/02 04/02-06/24-06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 I 2 1 i 3A 12/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07-. ;j 4K IL/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 ) 5 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 -;
~
6B , it/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 j it03 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07- 7; 14 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/t4-09/30 09/30-01/07 .j j 120 01/03-04/03 04/03-07/06 07/06-10/02 10/02 01/06 - a 15 1L/31-04/02.04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 , 16 12/31-04/01 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07' ?
,I 17 to 19 11/31-04/02 D4/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 1E/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 j
20 12/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 ej I ttB - 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 i 22 . 12/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24 09/30 09/30-01/07 23 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 fl ! 24 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30s4'/07 - Li' 26 12/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/12"v$/07 I 27 31 32 33A 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 - 1t/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 ll - i 30 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 40 IL/31-04/02 04/03-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 42 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 ) 43 11/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24 09/30 09/30-01/07 44 it/31-04/R2 04/02-06/24 '06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 ' : 45 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07' I 46 12/31 04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 47 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 46 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 49 11/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24 09/30 09/30-01/07 50 12/31-04/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30 01/07 51 12/31-D4/02 04/02-06/24 06/24-09/30 09/30-01/07 i i
ya ;; y FIGURE C-1 MONTHLY INSOLUBLE GROSS BETA-CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS,1989 10 ; __ +. .. _ - ,,#_.gn___ - __ _. ._ y _-_,...,--.-,.-_.--..,n,._h.-----_-4.-...vn.,.-
,. n .r _._-~.---:---
_g _ _ f.. , 4 _ _ _ _ .. L_.__ _i _ _ _ _ i . ._ L_.u ! d INDICATOR-1MM _
! ! i j
- i 0 CONTROL-1LL
- l_. 7 ...__.+..___4_
f f _._...._.y_______ *
-. _ - . ] _ - j _ -_4 __ _. (- _. _ . ._ . j . ._.,
.t i a
! se 1 ! !
P _ _ _ . r ___m _ ___ _ i w L g 1 _ _ w _A_ m p
,_a._._4 y
3__ e* ._ ; a __[v__a. ._ _m4_
-.T-. -_- Li .
.--J .
T v._ _ ' - M _L__ L it___i- -L._ g' h- I- J ! 4- ~L 4--
- -t[-
E 4- - R -c m Li _ _{5- jw _ pc - y - -- [, ~ m l _ - b _ i. > , 4 i r p__ a L __1_ _ _ u; u. J__ __.__ I
.F i ! .l- l l- j .;
p ;
- . - _ - p.
1 1 3
-u . - , - -. - . 4 . . _
> 7 : .
j l* ! l j
.]-
- i
'I 't i ' ' '
O.1 . JUL AUG SEP: OCT:NOV DEC JAN FEB: MAR'APR MAY JUN 1989? L : ~ i+-:- '-- . -~=-.--a- L---' ----J - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - + .__2__ _ _ _ _ _ ._ ~ - ~ . - ~ ~ ~ - - ' - n.L - -- --n----
FIGURE C-2 MONTHLY SOLUBLE GROSS BETA' CONCENTRATIONS IN SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS,1989 100 _ _ _ 4__ __ __., _. _ ._ . _. __.y_ _- _. . __.-4._. - _ g _ . . ___
._.7,._._ .
- . . . - - - . , - ..~ .
f.
-<._,...I.~4-w. 9 :
_ -T- INDICATOR-1MM _ _? __-. .., E , - - .L _.- i..m_ ! i _ i .
.,t .. . ! ! ,
-+ , - + _ . .
_ .- a. -- . O CONTROL-1LL 1- i ! . i i _ ..p__ q _ _. . _.. ._ _ _ q. m _ q._ ;
, 4
.p__.--.._.__.__.i.___ _--__..+;.__...-.q _ . . . - _ p- _. . 7
, i i 4 p i , ! t , + -
+ i !
I I ! p _q
-~-.4
.. .. . . _ - .y _ . y- .. . t e
3
-~_v
, 1 C ,
i
=
t
, l 3.
[ I ! t !
/ ! l i L 10 ____; u___u . o . : + ,
i __a : u_ t_ -L _ .4_ _ .1_ a_ -, __i ____ 1._ _.____.l 1._ . 1- .[ _ _ i .. 1._ i . ._-i... ._._ _ _ _ _. T t ! ..a. L __ L J __ i , - _ i_ _ 1 _. 4 __ _ E- I 1 1 lt - 4.- -L-.~ L i l ._p
; t t R __ _ __p _ __t_ .4, L-4, - _ i. _ _ _ . .
4 _,. 4 ,. _L. ' '
<. ,,._,_-44. -
D -h) t
! q i
> ; *Nc '
S
, ! j ; 1 7__ , - _
,. - ,_ - + .
x - .- - + - . .;
; -j f-
> c .
l-t t I - i~ i i
.1 JAN FEB - MAR: APRL MAY - JUN JUL AUG SEP-OCT-NOV DEC -
- 1989-
=______ _
= = . = - - . - = - -
h I 319083 O-C , WON 1HlK INSOl 0813 OHOSS 831V OONO3N1HV1lONS IN OHINMINO ' MV13H SVWdI 3S OOIT301301N 1H3 AIOINllA Od devdS' L696 LO
. a' a_ u. __ n__:
~
._ w _ _ ,. _ _ __ _ _- _.
~~T ET:zi: r: ~:1 TI L_~ <
~
~k
~ - ~
h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ INOIOV1OH-D I k _._ .-._,#.___l._~~._~_,~._~~~._4__ ' ! ! ; i I . .. O OON1H07-91 ! I I , 3 3 t .
--_ .---y._-_ ~ --
...--4____ -.3~ _.
j i i ;
- t. >
d ! __ _ ,!_ !. ! O l i l - i < [i
/ ;
! Y
! _Y, y ._4M_> [.__ 1pj~~ __ $,ZpZ __.j~~~Z1iii
~
. Z' n . .__;._
__7 _. _ _7 _ _.
.3 -
g _ p _ __ _ _ _ , _ _ _ . . _ . _ . _ r 1 g ._ m - }_.j_.__;___ j ___ j _ _j _ . _ A __. 2 ___ __ 7__ .__ _ . _ _ . _ . ~ . _ . . . ! t ! ! ! i e
- 7. , ! ! ! ! !
7, - ~ _ 4.-. - 1- .--.--._.;.- .- m.---..._;. .. . . , .
.+ .-;..
l a i, i : ' ! i ! !, i i ' 4 ! i ! ! - i, ) - i ' i : ' i i
- i : : i O'L i
PVN 338 WVH VdU WVA PON ral- VOD S3d 001 NOA 033 .! L696 l t 'l
4.egmy-FIGURE C-4 MONTHLY SOLUBLE GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN DRINKING WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS,1989 100pg__ =_____.
.. _; _.- y r, - 7.__
~
a . ._. .~ p ...__ . : . _ 3 _ __ __.__p._. . ..& _ _p _ L-g __ m ; _ . -_. .
-y INDICATOR-4L
_. . . _ _ +. 4-. . . 2
-L 4-- - + --t-i
=F CONTROL-68 -
4 I ! ; i l . _ _q _. - . g h ; : ,
-~_TT ~~~~ 7'-
17Z1 . _ .. TZ Z .ZT IZ_ C .~TC_ _ . ZZTZI~~TZi _ .1 ~._.~ Z .. ._ _' T '.
..7--
___-..y..1_-_~.--.
._ ,- .. .-..- __.- . -_ . w
- ,. ~ . - . -
~ ..
. ~ . _ t
.bO D.
N +f m)
- . f -- _ _$ ._ - . - . _ - __-.
[ ..
?
f_. , _ . _ _.j ___ _ ' I i J_.__' v i - g __ __d___ < r > ; l I f _ _._t _ T l i ! i i i i E ; ! ! ! . R I - - n;! t r r ;- _ _ ; r _ _ . . _ _ .._ 7 __. _ 3n. x._ _ : x c r : = n t r a c :: r -._
. . . _ _ . m
_-.__..._.__7.__._ _ ~ _ _ , _ _._._4_.--_.-__-_.-___.-._ __ _ _.. 9 _. _ , _.. _._-._ j ._ .. f . .q___....-__.__...j---_,. .- i. -
, i i
.~....f..-... . .- s. . s
. . . . . ~ .- h 7..
! 4 r
l- : i i i I i i t I e
- O.1 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1989 mW W W W W W W W W .W W W W W W W W W
M M M M M M M M M M M M S S M M S W W [ FIGURE C-5 ;
! MEAN ANNUAL CS-137 CONCENTRATIONS IN FISH SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VINCINITY OF PBAPS, 1971-1989 10 x , y _,= m, g3=7=_3 3;gggy7;gggg===r_r .;
.r -_. +. -. -
__4__- .. p_ 4 _ ; j .- ~ . .__.#.._ _.w ue..- _- +_.
-t _ -j-._r _.
O CONTROL-6C,6J,6H,6 i 1 _._ _. I _p._ [ J q g __ ; - 4 1 ,
- INDICATOR-1Y,1EE 4J -
i P 1 -- i s=. xx :r= r-- . _c c r : === :-- - -- m- - :- rr G r$M: r =_l==.g_.xn c _ . . ._=_ :r~ .1 4 _ _ 4 _ __ p __ _ 9_ _ ,__ _ a_ _ - p - _ a _ _ _ ._ - ._ a . _ _4 . ._ . p_ '
.YW b' p~_,' mV ~'..* ._
, ,w i_
g _jf .
.p._9..._._~~~T,_^~4_'~^._~+_i._'1...,~._~4_^~_4~~~4 _
__4. . L_* i __.4 . _ _J --__ L ~ _4 .__ _. i.. _4 . . i. l _. 1. _ _ . i ' _.2
/ i i -
_u t
-.a.
4
.i- - ,i _. . a ,!.. . . . ' . .: _ . . .! _ _ ., . .
i w . . w .. _
!/ l
^
R 01
-\ '
l f A a i = n a_=____ c p e =.___ =4.__m=&M=e g4m u,.__.,_.___4 . u _. wis t========= ___-.>___.4._. y _ _ 4 _4... _y .
.___.7____y_._+___p.__.__,_--._..y____ .. { ._ 4_. .., _.y a_
. .p ._A ; L, __4__ _ __ w 1 ___i.- . _ 2 ,.
. a y . . _
( __._4_, ._ q m _ _ [ . .._ l._ _._ L ___ L __L . ._ i. __,-..-_.a,.__..a_4_...;_
.l _i .
._. 4 l W _d '_i_!_ll_i L L I _ u _ u i _ 1 E !L , J_ . a E
T 0*01 [ i,
~ _2Z_*~__ a_-_...~ !." ._
-_.4
~~
_,_ _' ~ $_Z.3-'1. I l i.
. +_ . ,._i. ._ . .,, C D_C !Z2--~ ..YZ._
. A' i
~
y
. J_.__- 4.. .-. b. % -+__4-w~.-__.4.,_a_-,.a.__---._4__v.__..._4.
.- -_.4-._ 4 ._ ..
_..._.~..-._._...-
,._1 4 ._
.3 __
,._ i _j .. - , . .
. _[._ .H -_ _._ p _. _4_-___ p _ _ ,_ 4
. _ - p p g. .___. w _p . . . _ _ u.
4 4 e
.._L,.
._1_..-_. - -__9 -
4, p --p-
.- p _ # _ 4. _ t i
_u 4 _ . . , 4 i _. ~ -.q_._..i.._. . .
. ,-a_., . . -
. n. & ._
I '
- i ' '
O.001 i
- 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 YEAR i
) l
+w - , .m ...r - r,.
..- .c -- .-# ...r_ - -
4 .w e ,,r , m--- .-y .-v-. m..,,#.i .w.v. <-e,cv.,,,,..-e. -.%e,_ ..*w-'
3190H3 0-9 W3VN VNNOVI DS-LEZ OONOBN1HV1lONS IN S3OIM3NI SYWdI 3S OOIT30130 IN 1H3 AlOINllA 03 d8VdS' L6ZL-0696 LO .__ u _; _ , . . _ .
- atn;t,nr, n::x:mcm::r1: :st,.x2::
__7._... . . . . _.._ 9 ._ _ y _ _ q_ , _.,_ r p_ __ _. 7 _ _ .. . . ._ _ 9 ._ g.._.__.,. . _ . 1-t, . . t - i- t -t - -t- INOIOV1OH -90 __- r - - r _. .. -+1.._ 7 .
. 7
_. _ _~.9 . _ _ .7 -.
- i - ; --
; ! f V
-f J
-i C r' -i - INOBOV1OH -ti-
__ _ I _ . _._ -_ 4+!- +i 1
' l O
i i ._ }._.. [ h.__ i !. OON1H07-9d d - s O ! i i t i W ' i ' ' g :: : r 2 Prx+ _ ::n rr:c :21 :xx:::x:xxr cx2xn;_.. . : _.: c. - 3
...-p _ -., 7_. y. _.._g.. --.7-
__,-_-.--;..,._p_.,7__...,,. _. .g_ -_y-_.. _r _ _ ._,_ ., ..
-_y - . . v, . .7- e- a
._y . . . _7 __
9 -
.p _ 9_ _ -.
. _ - . . 7
_ { __
.,g.._.,,_,_ f _ .. . . _ _.,pt y,- .1 . , _ . . . .~
- 3. _
5 v . ~
; i i i i t ! i -
! i i '
W ___ i _4 M_.L _ _ q_. . - 4_ T._ 4._ , p_ .{._ d. . . q , .. [ k 1
]- j l l ' ~ !' f 0 0. rt 3,_ 4_. N+ *ru:x : _ s y _ _ + _. +. _w4_
~
+ -_Q -
,r_;;_/ zt: n :
. _+ _ . __ - ;4 4._ j__ p _ J _g n r
+
- g
., a .-nd "._.___nr;;. _ . j
_ _ ; .. _ - .m A , ____4,L.-. ._. 4, _.._ _.;_;_ _ J. L___ .. 4. _ _ -. ,a _ q _ ,.___J __ ( .-.. - . .,--g r- . ..c-. . .. , - __ . j
, .f . . _ ;
_.q . _ 4 . ._ . . .._
- 4. . .
__.,'_.._.3_.r. . . . - ._ ,
.,_r. , ._ _ _ . _ -
t i ! ! I
! r 1 t i i ! ! i t i ! : ! ! !- ! i O'O L lE 2F 49 19 80 93 99 89 99 ABVH M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M' M M M W
M M M M M M M M M M M M M W W W W W W FIGURE C-7 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS,1989 100 __a _ _ . , 4_.m._.___m__m._._ mm . i . . u _ q. _ . q - . 4 _ _ . i .. _ . _ _ p qa-_ _ 4 4, __ d _. + 4. d._,._ d .. . M -- ..L.... -
.j _ _ , - - _4 ._ _ _i_
., . - - ~ _.
_. ) _ . . _ i m. _. c - . __1 . _ y
. . I _. .
E J-
.____.i ____.J L l-1-T 1 + M "; -. .._.
+
_1 -q i ___p_ .- _ ,1_ _ ir _ _ ,1 _ _ - . I 9 L-4 -l > 2I __ L _..._ u:
+;
a _,s,
-..A -
3 4 - _ _ a __.
._ g___ t__4I i l
_...._;__.u i _._a,
- L : 'T! s m__#,
4-
. y ; , . , . . ; - -
.. f .
P i
~
~
'a ' .
Oyk ,
, E C [ ' -
l
- } 41! ,
! ) -
I ' '>
/ ! !
I -r i
'C 10 w ,g m .__i _ , _ _ _ .
U
,_._4 t-
._r.__ _._& ._ __ F .._i ._a i
_ 1_ _ _.f..___ _r. _ _j e_ g r_w _- t, o - t _ _.'.. _ F . ' _ 9 .. _.m_ _y_; : _. ___p_4 _ _q __ . p .4_.4__.p._ j __ 4 -p 4 ._ y _ ! ._._ . ; . __ l . _ _ +_ _p._._. p. _ g _...q _ 4 _ _ _. _ y u. .; ; __ g _. . . M _._4_J__F .H 4_ b_H pt 1 E : _.._[__H__ w_t_c__p.+ L. i : r i - 4 L Group i T f 2 j : , 1- , l E ____._.j_j_j__i_1 i _
! _;. i ^
Group 1 _. R t 1 i l- - 1 1 1 t r-, i i i { l- l !... ;
- l. t
; u Group lit i
} f + t > ;
I i 1; 1 I i1 I l'f f1 I I I il f 1 I 1 i t I I i 1 I i f 1 it i t i .i f t 1 i i- . .I - .i t m . . . . .i t .i i 1
- 1 4 7 10 13 16.19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43 46 49 52 WEEK NO.
i e a.---_: --_________t____.__ --,----______-________-_--___-____---___L----_-_.__,___-_-_.__u _________-_--__.__x__
"~
___-___-_--_--.__-e.__ . . _ a _-__,_-_.-_____.es- < . . _ - _ ,s. .s-- - . _ - - - -----.n.w-_-.__.--. . - - - - - - _ -
I i FIGURE C-8 i MEAN MONTHLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN air PARTICULATE , I SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1970-1989 j m+-+_+-- 1 __., m a 1000__&)a__u : _. _ { _ p p .+ . ; - -- + -- g - j ___ ,IA_tNosp.h_er_th 7 7 7 weapon _s TestLi.1.:.i.Zl.Z ALL STATIONS j 7 f__t - - j--- t t -t- --[; ;- t ~i ;;
. E -
1- ; ! _. _ _t.-_..;-- *~" j ~t ~ ~ i
~~^^^~t~ I l 3 _ 1_4_i_jId_1 II. _f_f - t~ } _L ! +- h-M L . '"'-
i P l
,! 1
; i I
I' I l, f_]! l- : C, hine,se Weapons' Test i i l _%_. y j _ t_ .-+
-t + - -i-- + -+ - "+
i
'f.
- C ! 'I I l;
i ' y l_/. . i. l
; 1 :
i ( fj f
! 4 *
! ) I
/ l i
i j i l ! , ! iii: Chernobyl ' C 100 _ a _ 5_ _ j._ _n _t -" m U __ n.n t g a_ _n a_q+_- _4 __+ 4 ._ qL79H + g r _ _ t__t_ i 4 gt_ _A 4 :- -i q- r l L . _~I-1,p F TMI 7- t- -E L -- +j-- '-- i-- H
._ _ L _T_C
__g u c n_ & _- 4 . _ +~ p_ L- % - . m& + M I 4 --MM h4 -H I h ~ I-E T __tL k I-M_ $sAe's __ STATUP ! _b~M + h _,I iV { I_d_ { !' . d--i-th-- l- -- t l 11_L_t-d i .1 l ! E
. 4 .
- R 1_b_t' 1 1 .
. 4" t 4 e '
! ! I i : ! i-
~
. 4 i ; ; , !
i ! 4 i 4
! l- .
1'
! I '
{ i , t 10 t 76 78 70 72 .74 80 82 84 86 88 ; YEAR' I _ . ~ _ , _ - . . . . . . . - . . . . . _ - - __. .._ _ - ~ _ _ _' . . _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _
M M. M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 4 FIGURE C-9 MEAN ANNUAL CS-137 CONCENTRATIONS IN MILK SAMPLES l COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1971-1989 100 u __2 4_ .m_ m a . n _ _. _ _ e _ 4 _ _ -..__t -- ._.-__a .t _ . _ _ __. p ,. _ . i . l .. _. ._1 .i . ._1 _ _.
. ~.7
__9__7 1, . .- __ _.___ k' _ _ f _ _. .. ._ _ip_ _ e. ._ ... _i. __--_a,* ,! . _ __._.__- ._. ._ l i l l l j . i . - ,!
; - INTERMEDIATE FARMS '
-.7 k j_d_..-
!__j,_ b {
- NEARBY FARMS -
I i p 4 __ . 4 i __ _ __4 ' i - j
;_ _ v___a>!
_. L _.....;___ a:...._L_ : C
! ! l !
i l . I . i
- / l L
1C!Qq 2_ g_._q_g _~_ ' a__g_ _ ._ L_t._ #-. d_ 4 _1. ._ ._ i au_ _n i 1 1
' _ ' - LJ_. _ ... i _. _. . i _ 1.. - -i._i_L m. l_ 1: i . . _. . _ . .
T i __s_ - i.-4 E --J 7-1 ,-t-+ i- - ' -i i }-_ R __H-y 1_ -_c - 4 , 4 , y
; _~ _
- __u _1 !< i i ! i .
L_~ __
; i ! : l i ! -r .
_._ _% __ } .., - i u._ & _ u _.4_ _ .! _ ! . : _ n. _ _ w -._ .__.
. -u n
t ; - i ! i : r 1 i i ' 1 i -
! ; 3 i ! ' t r ; zi I i ! ! l l I i i i i ! i i 1
72- 74 76 78 80 82- 84 86 88
- YEAR-4 w...b,., w % . mu.m-. ,. ..,.e.. u. y e. 4-e .:. a---, - - , .-.~% . v - , . - . , ,. . ,+.+.+,_,,--,.-..--..r-
+-.---....w--._..-.c.-,-. ._,_e_.-.w.-r.-
M FIGURE C-10 MEAN MONTHLY AMBIENT GAMMA RADIATION (TLD)- LEVELS IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS,1989 12 , M ! l : ' I
^
' ^
SITE L i i . L l
! ! ! % MIDDLE RING -
I . l 10 -j 0 OUTER RING. i-- - f- - - -- 4 R O ! '
. 1 E ! i t
! i N ! ! i i T l 1 i >
G E 8 - - - -~ - l I b i i . 2M i N 3 l , l
~
/ t i i
~
S 3 T- i - 1 4: - i c D 6f - 2-
-t,
" +--
--t--~
- 1 i
3
- ! i
' / j i
~
, i .
M i
~
! i
; i i
O .
! ; i ,
i ! l e 1 i i ! i i 4 ,
^
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP-OCT NOV DEC MONTH
. . . . - . - ~~~~
m P, eRE c.,, - 7 MEAN QUARTERLY AMBIENT GAMMA RADIATION (TLD)
- LEVELS IN THE VICINITY OF PBAPS, 1973-1989 I M 10
-e-f SITE I L k
O
-+- MIDDLE RING
-O- OUTER RING 8 -
I E N , T G - S j N e i M O p; - 4 I 73 74 76 78 77 YEAR 78 79 80 81 1 I y 10 I f l
-e- SITE
+ MIDDLE RING R -O- OUTER RING I- h 8 -
N x T G / % s E '
] -
N
/ /
_ . /) 8 62 y I D ' M O 4 ; ,,,;,,,,,,,;,,i;,, 82 83 84 85 88 87 88 89 YEAR t c
. . . m -. - -
F 8 g I I I I I I DATA TABLES AND FIGURES COMPARISON LABORATORY I B B B B B I B , I
J ~ APPENDIX D: DATA TABLES AND FIGURES - COMPARIS0N LABORATORY Table D I.1 I Concentrations of Gross Alpha Insoluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. I Table D I.2 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Soluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom. Atomic Power Station 1989. Table D I.3 Concentrations of Gross Beta Insoluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D I.4 Concentration of Gross Beta Soluble in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D I.5 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D II.1 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Insoluble in Drinking ' Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-1 tom Atomic Power-Station, 1989.- Table D II.2 Concentrations of Gross Alpha Soluble in' Drinking i Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table 0 11.3 Concentrations of Gross Beta Insoluble-in Drinking I Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bot-tom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D 11.4 I Concentrations of Gross Beta Soluble In Drinking Water Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D II.5 Water ConcentrationsofGammaEmittersinDrinkinhottom Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Atomic Power Station,-1989. I Table D !!I.1 Concentrations of Gross Beta in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Botton Atomic Power Station, 1989. Table D III.2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Air Particulate Samples Collected in the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989.
Table D IV.1 Analytical Data for Milk Samples Collected in the Vi- ! cinity.of Peach Botton Atomic Power Station,1989. ; Table D-V.1 Summary of Collected Dates for Samples Collected'in i the Vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 1989. i i FIGURES Figure 0 1 Weekly Gross Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate : Samples Collected from PBAPS Locations IA and 1Z, .! 1989. j j- Figure D 2 Weekiv C'oss Beta Concentrations in Air Particulate , l Sampi n ;allected from PBAPS Locations 4A and 48, i 1989. i 1 Il I! Ii, f I: I g? IL I: i l;
+ - , , .
. . . - , - - . - . . . , - . . - - _ . . - , - . - - . . - - . - . . . . . . . - - - . . ~ . -. -.. - --
Il,
I ; I The following section contains data and figures illustrating the analyses performed by the secondary laboratory. Duplicate samples were ob-I tained from several locations and media and split between Teledyne Isotopes (TI)andCleanHarbors Comparison of t se results for most media were ; within expected ranges,(CH). though occasional differences were seen: ,
- 1. TI gross beta results in water were generally higher than CB. How- -!
ever, CH K-40 results were genert11y higher than TI results, t I
- 2. CH results for gross beta in air particulates were slightly but
< consistently higher than those obtained from T!. It wa: observed i that the ratio l>etween the two laboratories remained relatively :
,a constant throughout the year (F gure D 1 and D 2). Inspection of i g the EPA results (see Appendix F indicated a similar ratio. The ' differences may be accounted fo by slightly different calibration ; procedures. ! ,I ! I ; I i I : I .I 4 i i I I ; l I : I ,
- - . .-- - - - . - _ ~ - . - - ..-
g-TA6Lt D.I.1 CONCDMRATIONS OF 4ROSS ALPHA INSOLUBLE IN SURFACE MATER SAMPLt3 [ l COLLECTte IN THE VICD4!TT OF PLACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWtp STAT!aHe 1969 5! l , RESULTS IN WITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SteMA j COLLECTION ILL IPt1 ~ f PERIOD ur , FEB 89 0.09. 1 0.07 0.09 1 0.09 L MAY 89 0.4 2 0.2 0.6 1 0.2 l AUG 89 0.21 1 0.00 0.2 1 0.1 i tw 89 0.15 1 0.00 0.22 1 0.06
, t
' MEAH 0.21 2 0.27 0.33 1 0.64 !
E : 6 l i TABLE 0.I t CalctHTRATimes OF OROSS ALPHA SOLUBLE D4 SURFACE WATER SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITT OF PtACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIOH 1969 RESULTS D4 WITS OF PCI/ LITER t 2 SteMA . l COLLECTION iLL - IM ; PERIOD i i FEB 89 < 0.5 ( 0.7 MAY 89 C 0.3 < 0.1 AUG 89 < 0.8 C 0.7 IW 89 0.6 1 0.6 C 0.5 , MtAH 0.6 t 0.5 < 0.5 TABLE D.I.3 COCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA INSOLUBLE D4 SURFACE NATER SAMPLES I COLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PtACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION.1969 '- ' RESULTS IN WITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 810NA
+
COLLECTIM4 1LL 1P91 , PERIOD FEB 89 0.2 1 0.1 0.3 1 0.1 i MAY 89 1.8 2 0.2 2.1 1 0.2 , AUG 89 0.6 1 0.1 1.0 1 0.2 i im 69 0.4 1 0.1 0.5 2 0.1 ' HE#4 0.6 1 1.4 1.0 1 1.6 TABLE D.I.4 COCDRRATIONS OF GROSS BETA SOLUBLE IN SURFACE MATER SAMPLES I4 , COLLECTED D4 THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTON ATOMIC POWER STATIOH 1969 RESULTS D4 WITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SleMA COLLtCTION ILL 1Pti PERIOD FEB 89 1.7 2 0.5 1.8 1 0.5 MAY 89 0.7 2 0.3 0.3 1 0.3 AUG 69 2.1 1 0.5 2.2 1 0.5 tW 69 1.5 1 0.5 2.0 1 0.5 ' MEAH 1.5 1 1.2 1.6 1 1.7 3-
~
Y f^Sr -
) - a-m--- gg-- g- a wp-,am'N4'- w w ---rp --9y'* *P- -- "' Sp
E 1 I I , .=,i . =,s = j vvvv v vvvy v
; ==!! E =,!! ,
I g vvvv v vvvv v
$ meme m emmm m
.... v v... v s
I 3 mamm m mmmm m vvvy v vvvy v g
, .. , - m... .
vvvv v vvvy v g
. - m I $0 vvvv v vv v P
l ! . { vvv. y v vvvv v I se 16 . mmm. m . .. . vvvv v vvvv v I il! i
. .=== = ..,= ,
I $s2*: Eb 5 vvvv v vvvv. v E EsB I Iae S m .. . VVVV V m... vvvv v B> bm m I- ga 5
- e. , g m m. . . .. .
g vvvv v vvvv v I C Ib8-b h isst ::s-l I- n SE Eill Bill r 6 5 I E
- d I' S.
. Di . E.
I
TA8Lt D.!!.1 CONCtHTRATIONS OF 90089 ALPHA IN90LLNLt IN DRDEING WATER SAMPLt3 i 00LLECTt0 D4 THE VICD4 TTY OF PEACH B01 TOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 1989 Rt9ULTS D4 WITS OF PCI/ LITER $ 2 83GMA l t COLLtCTION 4L 61 -i' PERIOD FEB 89 C 0.06 0.17-t 0.09 l MAY 89 0.8 1 0.1 0.9 1 0.2 ! AUG 69 ~ 0.09 1 0.05 0.05 1 0.04 , HOV 09 0.15 2 0.09 0.2 1 0.1 j HEN 4 0.16 1 0.20 0.33 1 0.77 Ii i TABLE D.II.! CD4CDNRAT20HS OF GROSS ALPHA 90LUBLE DJ DRDED4B WATER SAMPLES . COLLECTED Di THE VICINITY OF PEACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION.1969 l RESULTS IH (441TS OF PCI/ LITER 12 81eMA - COLLECTICH 4L 62 PERIOD i FtB 69 C 0.7 c 1.2 ; MAY 69 < 0.10 < 0.1 ' AUG 69 c 0.5 < 0.7 HOV 89 < 0.5 < 0.5 : MEAN c 0.45 < 0.6 TABLE 0 II.3 CCHCtHTRATIONS OF GROSS BCTA IH90LUBLE IN D'tDEING WATER SAMPLtS i COLLECTED D4 THE VICINITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIOHe 1909 5 RESULTS D4 WITS OF PCI/ LITER 12 SIGMA l COLLECTION 4L 61 l PERIOD = . FEB 69 0.2 1 0.1 0.4 2 0.1 , MAY 89 0.4 1 0.1 1.5 1 0.2
- AUG 89 0.3 1 0.1 0.1 2 0.1 't HOV 89 0.3 1 0.1 0.4 1 0.1 MEM4 0.3 1 0.2 0.6 1 1.2 .l ei TABLE D.II.4 CONCDNRATIG48 0F SROSS BETA SOLUBLE D1 DRDe(IHs 64ATER SAMPLt3 COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PLACH 90TTOM ATOMIC POWER STATICHe 1969 RESULTS D4 WITS OF PCI/ LITER 2 2 SIGMA COLLECTION 4L 61 PERIOD .
FEB 89 1.6 2 0.5 2.4 1 0.5 MAY 89 c 0.3 0.T t 0.3 AUG 69 1.6 1 0.4 2.6 2 0.5 1.7 1 0.4
- 0.5 TOV 69 1.9 t l MEN 4 1.4 .* 1.5 1.9 2 1.7 L I .
I ,. I. I;
- ~ - - - . . - - ~ . - ~ - . . . . . . . ,.. . , ..- ,
I I k p',___ VVVV V VVVV V I , .... . ..~. . I VVVV V VVVV V l , e yVVV V VVVV V I VVVV V VVVV V I - vvvy v vvvy v g I 4 i I l-
,i
>0 I il . .
ils 8 _... ._ I 3 1: ., I . .
.v . v I L8! ____ _ ____ _
.v., , ov.. .
Ig3, I *s EE : : : la5 a a::: a I i, i ce ! :.:.a: 5 i l ; 5 *l
!! stasIsst: I grsist sitt I d i
-g. 4 I
I
I TABLE D.II.5 COHCD4RATIGHS OF fnW9tA EMITTttl D1 DRD6;IH6 64kTER MMPLtt COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF PEACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 1969 RESULTS IH L&4rTS OF PCI/ LITER 12 $18MA STATION 00tLtCTIG4 CODE PERIOD CS.136 C$.137 6A.140 LA.140 NAatt6 TH.tt6 4L FE6 69 <7 <3 to 1 20 <6 7 16 <6 APR 69 < 30 <3 < 70 < 20 <5 -( 6 AUG 69 < 20 <3 < 70 < 20 <5 <6 tW 69 20 t 20 <3 < $0 < 10 <5 C6 Mthi 19 1 19 <3 53 1 47 < 14 6 12 <6 62 FE6 69 <6 <3 < to C7 <6 <6 APR 89 < 30 <3 < 90 < 30 <6 C6 m AUG 69 < 40 <3 < 100 < 40 .c 5 C6 tm 69 < 20 <3 < $0 <6 C6 6 16 MEM4 < 25 <3 < 65 C 21 <6 6 10 " I I I I I, I i I I I I I I
I I TABLt D.!!!.1 CXNCtWTRATICHS OP 680$$ BETA IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLt3 COLLtCTED IN THE VICINITY OF PDAPS.1969 I PESULTS IH tal!TS OP t.1 PCI/CU. METER $ t $10MA NttK 12 4A 1 30 44 27 14 I 2 3 4 8 to 17 29 34 14 24 25 14 17 19 32 19 14 24 15 13 6 23 14 30 t5 I 10 7 6 9 16 24 27 19 24 14 14 14 20 21 24 17 14 14 24 14 I 11 21 14 21 14 12 17 14 14 14 13 11 13 11 13 14 14 24 14 14 15 15 14 14 24 I 16 17 to 19 22 23 12 9 t8 14 13 24 12 22 9 9 14 14 23 24 20 23 13 I 16 16 tt 17 14 17 24 22 19 13 17 13 23 it t4 10 14 24 13 14 20 t5 I 25 26 27 to 19 6 14 13 16 16 24 14 13 14 14 13 16 12 16 14 24 13 15 9 14-I 30 31 32 33 19 ft 16 17 13 t4 24 24 to 24 15 16 13 14 14 14 I 34 21 23 19 23 35 27 15 25 15 36
- 16 14 20 14 37 21 24 20 24 36 11 23 9 13 I 39 40 41 42 16 39 16 27 24 24 24 14 11 24 20 27 14 14 14 14 43 24 45 29 25 I 44 45 46 47 30 26 24 20 23 14 15 13 7
35 23 21 12 15 25 14 I 46 to 23 22 t4 49 19 24 14 14 50 37 24 27 14 51 47 16 M t4 52 25 25 17 14 MEAN 21 1 15 19 t 13 I I I g
7 It
- i. l l
l 1 l l j l TABLE D.111.2 CONCtHTRATICHS OF 64P91A EMITTER $ 2H AIR PARTICULAft - SAMPLES COLLECTED IN THE VICINITY OF P6APS,1969 I it Rt3ULTS IN LHITS OF PCI/CU. Mt1ERS 1 2 81eMA l 97AT20H COLLECT 20H . CODE PERIOD St.7 K-40 CS.134 C$.137 1
....... ........... ............. ............. ............. ............. j 12 JAN 69 90 1 10 c 20 .< 0.7 c 0.6 1 FEB 69 100 1 10 < 20 < 0.5 ( 0.5 {
MAR 69 90 1 10 it i 10 < 0.5 < 0.5. ! APR 69 120 1 20 < 10 -< 0.6 < 0.6 l MAY 69 60. 1 10 < 10 < 0.4 < 0.5 i AM 69 60 t 20 < 10 < 0.7 < 0.6 j JUL 69 100 t 20 <9 < 0.5 < 0.5 , AUG 69 60 1 10 10 1 10 < 0.6 c 0.4 SEP 69 70 t 20 <9 C 0.5 < 0.4 j OCT 69 90 t 20 < 10 < 0.6 4 0.6 .j HDV 89 60 t 20 < 10 c 0.6 < 0.5 : DEC 69 60 1 30 < 20 < 1. 0 < 0.6 . HEAH 66 . 1 27 it t9 < 0.6 < 0.5 *i 4A JAH 69 100 t 20 < 20 < 0.6 c. 0.6 . k j Ft6 69 70 2 10 < 20 < 0.6 C 0.5 MAR 69 60 2 10 <6 < 0.4 < 0.4 i APR 69 60 t 20 C 40 c 0.9 c1 1 MAY 69 60 2 10 C9 < 0.5 C 0.4 ! JtM 69 60 t 20 < 10 < 0.6 c 0.6 l JUL 69 60 1 50 .c 40 <1 <1 ] AUG 69 60' t 10 20 1 10 - c 0.5 < 0.4
$EP 69 60 1 10 c6 < 0.4 C 0.4 OCT 69 100 t 20 20 - t 10 c 0.6 < 0.6 -
ICV 89 70 1 10 11 t9 < 0.5 < 0.5 i DEC 69 50 t to C 10 < 0.6 C 0. 7 ' i MEAN 79 & 26 16 1 23 < 0.6 < 0.6 I!
- gy i
i b j l l
,'f gH --_.m__ _ _ . _ _ _-_______.__ _ , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _m._.__ _ _ , , , _ , . _ . _ _ _ + m . _ , , , , , . , , , .,_g_. p.,g.yg_ 9 ,,.,9 9 ,_.y p I.-
py
M M M M m- m M M M . . . m m M M W W m W TABLE 0-IV.1 ANALYTICAL DATA FOR MILK SAMPLES rDLLECTED IN THE VICD4ITY OF PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC MIMER STATION 1969 RESULTS IN tA4ITS OF PCI/LITMr + 2 SIGMA STATI(R4 COLLECTICD4 CODE PERICO SR-69 SR-99 I-131 K-49 CS-134 CS-137 BA-149 1A-149 94-226 TM-226 92/29 < 3 + 0.3 < 9.07 1479 + 99 <3 <3 < 19 <3 <4 <8 J 1.5 95/29 < t 2.4 + 0.7 < 9.99 1509 + 199 <3 <3 < 29 <7 <6 <S 96/21 < 2 f.9 + 0.2 < 0.96 1379 + 99 <3 <3 < 29 <4 <6 <8 11/13 < 9.97 1399 + 299 <5 <6 < 30 <9 < 19 < 29 MEAN < 2 1.9 + 0.9 < 9.96 1499 + 164 <4 <4 < 29 <6 <7 < st H 92/29 < t 1.7 + 0.4 < 9.07 1919 + 99 <3 <3 < 19 <3 16 +6 <9 95/29 < 8 2.9 + 9.3 < 0.96 1599 + 199 <3 <3 < 29 <5 <4 <S 96/21 < 7 4.9 + 9.9 < 9.9 1329 + 99 <3 <3 < 39 <9 <6 <8 11/13 < 5 2.3 + 9.9 < 9.97 .1399 + 299 <5 <5 < 39 <9 < 19 < 29 MEAD 4 < 5 2.5 + 2.1 < 9.06 1363 + 164 <4 <4 < 23 <7 19 +9 < St A 92/20 < 1 f.9 + 0.5 < 0.1 1599 + 100 <3 <3 < 19 <3 <6 11 +6 05/26 < 1 2.7 + 9.4 < 9.96 1469 + 90 <3 <3 < 29 <5 <6 <8 96/21 < 3 f.6 + 9.9 < 0.97 1410 + 90 <3 <3 < 19 <5 <6 <6 11/13 < 2 2.4 + 9.5 9.12 + 0.91399 + 299 <5. <5 < 39 <9 < 19 < 19 MEAN < 2 2.2 + 9.6 9.99 + 9.91423 + 161 <4 <4 < 16 ' <6 <7 9 +3 t I l
' - -- ' ' ' "'IlIu1111llI1i 8""' II ' ' . . . . ' . --l
_"z___w: '..,.,,,.,.,l';'--l
- TABLt D.V.1 SLD9tANY OP 00LLE: TION DATtt POR SAMPLES COLLECTIO IN TMt YICINITY OF PEACH DOTTtM ATOMIC POWER STAT 10He 1999 h!
g; SURF ACE WATER (49099 ALPHA. 68098 BETA Ate GAP 9th) !
............. .i COLLECT 10H ILL tt99 7 Ptp100 '
.......... ............. ............. +
f EB 09 0 U03 03/03 Ot/03 03/03 [ MAY 89 05/05 06/02 05/05 06/02 + AUG 89 07/26 06/25 07/26 06/t5 .i IW 89 11/03 12/06 11/03 12/01 j k s i DRD0'DE WATER (GROSS ALPHAe GROSS BETA AHO SAP 9tAl-Ii ' COLLECT 10H 4L- 62 ' i PERIOD
.......... ............. ............. I f tD 89 02/04 03/04 Ot/04 0V 04 i MAY 69 05/07 06/04 05/07 06/05 AUG 69 07/29 06/t6 07/t9 06/t6 l tW 69 11/05 12/03 11/05 12/03 h
4 P
,t 4
I: Il 1
;l Il i
)
t
. _ ._. . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ -._._ . _ _ . , . . ~ _ . - _ , . . _. . J
I I TASLt D.V.1 30914RT OF COLLICT2G4 DAf t$ Poe SAPPLtS COLLECTt0 De lht VICD4 TTY OF Pt.ACH DOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATIG4,1969 AIR PARTICULATtt WitK 1Z 4A I 1 2 3 4 12/31 01/07 01/07 01/14 01/14 01/21 01/t1 01/27 01/27 02/04 12/31 0t/07 01/07 01/14 01/14 01/21 0t/21 01/27 5 01/t7 02/04 I 6 7 0 9 et/M 02/tt 02/11 0Ut? 02/17 02/25 Outs.03/M euM.02/11 DU11 02/17 02/17 02/t5 0t/25 03/04 I 10 03/04 03/11 DVM.03/Il 11 03/11 0V10 01/11 03/16 12 CV16 0VtB OV16 03/ts 13 OVtl.M/02 DVt5 04/02 14 M/02 04/06 M/02 04/06 I 15 16 17 16 04/06 04/16 M /16. M/tt 04/tt. M/30 M/30 05/07 M/06 04/16 M/16 04/tt M/tt.M/30 M/30 05/07 19 05/07 05/13 05/07 05/13 I 20 21 tt 23 05/13 05/21 05/21 05/27 05/27 06/04 06/04 06/11 05/13 05/21 05/21 05/27 05/27 06/04 06/04 06/11 I 24 06/11 06/17 06/11 06/17 25 06/17 06/24 06/17 06/24 26 06/t4 07/01 06/24 07/01 27 07/01 07/09 07/01 07/09 26 07/09 07/15 07/09 07/15 I 19 30 31 32 07/15 07/21 07/21 07/t9 07/19 06/05 06/05 06/11 07/ts.07/tt 07/tt.07/29 07/29 06/05 06/05 06/11 OS/11 06/10 06/11 06/16 I 33 34 06/16 06/26 06/16 06/t6 35 06/26 09/01 06/26 09/01 36 09/01 09/06 09/01 09/06 17 09/06 09/15 09/06 09/15 I 36 39 40 41 09/15 09/t3 09/t3 09/30 09/30 10/07 10/07 10/13 10/13 10/21 09/15 0?/23 09/23 09/30 09/30 10/07 10/07 10/13 42 10/13 10/21 I 43 44 45 Q 10/21 10/27 10/27 11/05 11/05 11/11 11/11 11/17 10/21 10/27 10/27 11/05 11/05 11/11 11/11 11/17 11/17 11/25 11/17 11/t5 I 47 46 11/25 12/03 11/t5 12/03 49 1t/05 1t/09 1t/03 1t/09 50 12/09 12/16 luc 9 12/16 51 12/16 12/23 12/16 12/23 I 52 12/23 12/19 1U23 lt/29 . I , I ,
.. _a
A FIGURE D-1 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM PBAPS LOCATIONS 1A AND 1Z,1989 1000 e. ._1 7 e r . - _ . _ . (.. _._44 - . y 4.-
. -s -
-4~
.as4 a
-y+ - .
w.
+
4.__ j ._ p p . .. +. - .. A < t. i 1A (CH) E -Y ~i ~ T t ~i ~ t" t~ F~ t -~ 0 __ a__a_ p p p. 4, q __ 1 , . ,
+ -i- . ,
1Z (TI) - A
) h I
- i I
_ _ _ ____-...__..;.~. . .1~.i. - . . , , . . . .
; i ! : :
i ' i i 1 : -
; 1 ,i ! <n i
+
t i i r P 100 _ _i_p_; _ 4_ _a
, __l.___ ;4__ __i_ _ . 4__
.m ..
C ___ __,4_ 4 . . ,._ - - j _ . 4_.,_ _4 . , - .,.._A- ...
.{......_1- _.__..i._
g _ _q . p._ y_..___ - _--_y.m__+_- _ p _ p_ -._, _- . _ e _--- ' 4 ._H .._ . . __ _ ._ _ f .. _.a _q.g_.__ . . _. . _ ._
....j _ . -y_7 _ . . . ~ . _ , _ _
- 1. _ ..L _ .._ p g .. 4 _ m .
/ _. __L._._4 _ [_. _ 7. _ 4__._ { l _. y -_y_ _. p_ . . ._...j _._q_ _._; L g .
L ( '1 p ___i;_ _ L _. y ,____ L _-__1 _ M . i ,,-
- .o- .
_ a , t. U ' i
~
{ d'
, , 1 e . ! f 4 i l 10 M _._ _-___ ++ -~_
__ _ ,~- _
- r. _.l._ -. ._ _ . ~ . ,
A._ ,4 _ - 4_3~.-.
.,.~__w_ .
E _.~...__..___n..__,_e__.s--._.y-._._.y.__.4._,.__#___ n .- _. ____+_.__g_
. ._ . r u.--
.2_, :__. 4_ _ .-p. a_ -q _. __+ 3 - :_. 4 - ._._ pm 2 .
. . _ . . _._r . - . . _ . . - c. __
E _ ___.p_i_ 4 .._ & _ L L _ ;. L 4 .__.U i_ , 2_. L . R , l _. . ( q- _7-. 3 3._ - + e
? ,
1 I I I f f f I I iiiI iif I f Iit iI i1 I fI I I I I I f I f f I ! t i 11 1 6I I 1 o 4 4 4 i i l 4 i i 4 6 e e a 1 4 7 10 13 16 19.22 25 28-31 34 37 40 43.46.49 52 WEEK NO. 'm e mas e e e e m EEIR mmW W W W m W
- = - - - - - , c , m r- , , , , ,
FIGURE D-2 MEAN WEEKLY GROSS BETA CONCENTRATIONS IN AIR PARTICULATE l SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM PBAPS LOCATIONS 48 AND 4A,1989 1000 .;u g- g,z n 7
.=.=-.:1 .- - :
I 1
- a. .a :
- w._.* '
.L-.6_. . L. . ..... -a. i... ,~ aw- . .
'___ p p _p .t- '
-H-d-L -
- 48 (CH)
~ ~ - ~__ ~~~r v t = r~ ~
_. - T '__ __ L ,
~
E _______ _-. ._ _ . ... _ . _ O g (p) . . . _ . 3 - J-t+~47ti ! !. 1
-t t
'. *I, r
t, l y {=_.4 n_ . ( i P C 100 _ _m __ _. gj.____g++_ _a a, ] m{ _{- _ ti__p_p_.q__ g._;- 9 _. _ .. g q _ . __... 4. _ . _ _
+ _ # m_.
g y..a- x-. .. _. - ._ -,- - +- t_ a .-+_.-...._t -
/ _ _ _ f._ I A. _ d._ _1_ ~d.__I_ _ L ._b_. 4- .
q-_J . _...._}__ I. ,
.j C [
k l, M M J - L1Td + i i e' E L-I' 3- i U ' l- -
^
_: - i
's .'..' _ . _. ;. .. A
! ]
- l.
I i -
.. , I .
_-f-l f I . ! I ! ! y 10 _ _r _ p _ .n-. . a ,__
.g
_ . - q . =-.r._ --g _r_.. _+. _. #. w- -., _ , ._4 __. 3 7 .m . .,-. , - . .-, ... . _ . _ _ w_n -_.4._.. E . ma -- . n-.-+ _- __ 4 . .. _.._ j ._ . .._1._ . . .j : . . _ _q _._ . . . { _ .1__. 4. -_. _.1_ . . ._j . . -_...__..p..._-.._-;... ;_ s >
.1 -
- .. l - n. - > .
s_ .. , . . . .t. u i E i _7-a - - ..
. +1 . . .
~ . .4 .-
4 R \ i l ,a .
; i i !
I i . .!
, . I
! } l l ,.
i ! I j i i i l i, >! f ! c f i
- l- 1 i .! -
4 i I I I if isI t I i !t I f I I i1 i t iiI f i 1 iif 1 i f f f f f I I i I eI if f f i 1 i a i i i e a : i i 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34 37 40 43:46 49 52 WEEK NO. m
_. -...-..... - - - . -... . . .... -.__ -._~. _.. .- . -. . .
- i
?
l I ! I 1 1 rI ! 1: 1 2
'i.
lI
'I 1
i ! .f I . ! i e 3 1 SYNOPSIS OF ANALYTICAL' PROCEDliRES: ! 4 , . 'I
. .?
i ' 1 ! l t t, l 4 4 i k I 4 f i I L b a h k [ I
........i....._.__.__........_._______ _.___ _ _ _ _ ______ __ _ __._ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ . _ .
s ~ APPENDIX E: SYNOPSIS OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES The following appendix is comprised of two sections: Section 1 describes the col-lection methods used to obtain samples for the REMP, and Section 2 describes the methods y and formulas used by Teledyne isotopes and Clean Harbors to obtain the sample activities. l l l I I I l l 1 1 I I I E-l _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - _ - J
I! f Section 1: . Collection Methods I! ! Surface and Drinking Water Samples Surface and drinking water samples are composited over e one-month period at four ! l locations (ILL, IMM, 4L and 61). Water is continuously sampled at each location and col-- g;
- lected in large tanks. Two quarts of water are removed from the tank each week and put gj i
into a clean two-gallon polyethylene bottle to form a monthly composite. At locations' 13A 1 l; and 13B a monthly grab sample is obtained. ! Well Water Samples l l Prior to collection of well water samples, the well pump is run for several minutes aj to flush the line. Two gallon grab samples are then collected from the building faucets. . This sampling method is utillied at all four sampling locations. g,! - l 1 Air Particulate and Air Iodine Samples ~ l
. g '.
E Air particulcte samples are obtained using a system consisting of a pump, a glass fiber filter with a 35-mm diameter orifice, and a running time meter to indicate the total. j; l- period of operation. At those locations where altborne lodine was also sampled, a char- 'I coal filter was mounted behind the glass fiber filter. The volume sampled for the period-if determined from the known flow rate and the running time. At the end of each weekly. air particulate collection period, the air sampilns unit is stopped. The filter is then
=.
- j. removed from the holder and replaced with a clean' filter, and the air sampling unit is. '
L returned to operation. Soll Samples Collection of soil samples is accomplished by obtaining 3-inch plugs of soll 4 to 6 I inches deep from a 4 square foot area and mixing them in a plastic bag. . Approximately , 1000 grams of the composite is then placed in a plastic bottle. li W-Sediment Samples l Sediment samples are collected by one of two methods, determined by the depth' from W which the sediment is obtained. In water greater than 4-feet deep, sediment is collected by either a Ponar or Ekman Grab with a surface area of 31 square inches. In shallow water . l, (1-4 feet), sediment la collected by scooping up mud with a plastic two gallon bucket,
. u ,,
Milk Samples j Milk samples are obtained by removing two gallons from the dairyman's . bulk tank. i The sample from each location is therefore a composite of all the milk from the dairy herd - l l. 1 (from I to 3 milkings). The milk is scooped from the agitated bulk tank and placed.in new plastic containers. Vegetation Samples ll E l Samples of approximately 500 grams of cut grass and wild greens are placed in. ! polyethylene bass and scaled for shipment. Crops are collected.when available and shipped:
- in plastic bottles. ;
)
C E-2 4 1 I: .
I
. I Fish Samples
~
Fish samples are collected via several methods at Conowingo Pond locations; canal ~ I fish are caught by net trapping. Fish at other locations are caught by seine or.elec-
- troshocking techniques.
I ' I , I I I a I 1 I ' I o I l e .
,1 E l E-3 I '
. _ _ _ _ ___._m_. _ ..
I L ' Section 2: Analytical Methods and Calculations
- DETERMINATION OF GROSS ALPHA AND/OR BETA ACTIVITY IN WATER SAMPLES'.
. (TOTAL SUSPENDED AND DISSOLVED FRACTIONS)
~
Teledyne Is'otopes
~
This describes _ the process used to measureithe radioactivity 'of. water samples without; identifying the radioactive species present.. No' chemical separation techniques 1 are involved.
.For-well water samples a 1-liter. aliquot is evaporated almost to: dryness and then transferred to a 2-inch stainless. steel planchet.
l W g
~
For surface and drinking water samples,' one liter of the sample is filtered under vacuum through a 0.45_ micron Millipore filter. This filter represents' the_ insoluble por-c 5 tion of the . sample. The filter is dried and mounted on a planchet. The filter which represents'the soluble portion of the sample is~ evaporated on a hotplate, and'the residue is '.ranferred and dried on another' planchet, g a :) The planchets are counted for 50 minutes in a low-background gas flow proportional g counter. Calculation' of activity _ includes:a self-absorption correction for: counter ef - gl ficiency based on the weight _offresidue on each planchet.' Calculation of Sample Activity or of the MDL' t *A hgfdi/l) " . 2.22(v)(E) i 2.22( v)( E) - Net Activity Counting Error I where: N = total counts from ' sample (counts)z '! t = counting time for sample (min)- 2.22
= background rate of counter (cpm)
= dpm per pCi l-!
e v --volume in liters E = efficiency of the counter 2 = multiple of counting error l:li W The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result.' Less than MDL is reported as the result 'when this value !is greater than the measured ; lg E j; result defined above. 1 E-4 a
,a
.,._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ ._ _ . ~ _ _ __ _ __ __ , . _ . . , . -
l- 3 l Lg' i b (t , y Clean Harbors This describes the process used to measure the overall radioactivity of water f samples _ without identifying the radioactive species present. No chemical separation tech. !L niques are ~1nvolved. l - [- ' For well. water samples, a l liter aliquot is evaporated almost to dryness in a !
- g' beaker and then transferred to a 2-inch ringed planchet. It is then evaporated to dryness ,
'g =
. and counted using a gas' flow proportional counter.L t
!~- - For surface and drinking water samples, the samples are first filtered through mem- l !: brane filters of 0.45 micron met.n pore size. The filtrate is treated as' above. -The fil- ~ } . ter papers are transferred to a pre-weighed' planchet, Ignited using acetone and a flame, -4 ,g. and then put into a muffle furnace' for final ashing.' ' The ash is then counted using' a ' gas ' l ,g flow proportional counter. [
, t Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error:
'I C, Cg, - '2
'C s
+
Cs
'l d
y
*K % T,' 'T' b
C . pdi ) " Tfll)TE)F;~ i - ( 2.22)( E)( v) u' Net Activity- Coun' ting Error lW where: l C, = tota! tross- sample counts (counts) iW T, e sample count time (min) t
, Cb ilotal background count (counts). .
L T,b = background count time (min) *
- E = pounting efficiency based on CS-137.or uranium i
, for the weight of planchetted sample ' ! v = aliquot size in' liters l , l 2.22 = dpm per pCi t 2 = multiple of counting error- ' li 4 - 3 The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. , Less than MDL is reported as' the result when this valm is greater than the net activity. .i j l f y L e-, 1 t
I il DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM IN WATER BY ELECTROLYTIC - g ENRICHMENT AND 1.lQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING g Teledyne Isotopes . A 60 ml aliquot is distilled and collected in an Erlenmeyer flask.~ Approximately 55 g of the~ distillate is transferred into an electrolytic enrichment cell. One ml of 30%
~
sodium hydroxide solution is added to the cell. The sample is' electrolyzed in a 10 C - ; cooling water bath' until the volume is 3-4 mis. CO is bubbled through the solution to ' neutralize the sodium hydroxide. ' The sample is transferred to a collecting bottle at
-80 C arid weighed. It is then transferred into a liquid scintillation vial and- 20 mis of -
- cocktail iis added. ' The sample is: counted for 100 minutes in a liquid scintillation h
counter. . Determination of the Enrichment Factor ' Aliquots of-'a tritium standard sol 0 tion have been enriched toldifferent final volumes to provide a graph 4 of- the enrichment factor versus the final volume.- Enrichment Factor nitial = ((final. volume) volume) (observed (standard dpm/ml) dpm/ml) , Calculation of the Sample Activity or of the MDL for Tritium f
.i I
.p ;2 Net pCi t- 'b *t 1 unit vol.
- 2.22( v)( EF)( E) .4 2.22( v)( EF)( E) -
Net Activity Counting Error where: f N = total counts from sample (counts) ' t = counting time for sample (min) 2.22
= background rate of counter (cpm)'
dpm l{! W-
=g g. i y
= initial volume (in liters) . before enrichment 5 EF = enrichment factor = .039 x.VF + .603 where VF:- Final Volume .
E = efficiency of the counter tritium 2 = multiples of counting error -' The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. Less than MOL is reported as the result when this value is greater than the net activity, j e E-6 - l'.._ I"
1 I - i DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM.BY GAS COUNTING
'i Teledyne isotopes !
[ I A 2 ml' aliquot is oxidized and the hydrogen gas is collected-in an activated char-coal trap. The hydrogen .is then transferred into a previously evacuated one liter propor_ .
' tional counter. Non-tritiated hydrogen and ultra-high purity _ methane is added and then
'f;
- counted. Backgrounds and standards are counted-in the same gas mixture as the samples.
Calculation of the Sample Activity or the MDL: a
'i 3.234 x tug x Vg, C - CPMa - BKG ] i CPMgxV8 CIM M AV'S " (24oG3+oBh -
Net Activity - Counting Error - - where: TU3 = the tritium units of the standard _; Vg = volume of the standard' used to calibrate 7 the efficiency of the detector '(psia)-
~
.i Vs - volume of the sample loaded into"the i; CPM g detector'(pala) j
_ = the cpm activity' of the standard of volume V' i l CPMo = the gross activity of the sample of volume V. 3: , 'g and the -detector background [ g BKG = the background of the detector in epm 4 ! 3.234 = conversion factor changing TU to pCl/l 'g- 2 oG
= multiple-of theLcounting error
,3-~ = standard deviation of the gross activity 'of _ ' i the sample and the detector background, in cpm . oB = standard deviation-of the background, in cpm ~ l The MDL is defined as that value equal to the' two sigma counting error of th' e mRt. i Less than MDL is reported as the result.when this value is greater than the net activity. p
- E '
Lg i a I t j
z 7 I E
. DETERMINATION OF. GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATE SAMPLES
' Teledyne Isotopes
; This describes 'the process used to measure the overall beta activity of air- particu- -
-flate filters without identifying the radioactive species present. No. chemical separation; techniques are involved. Each air particulate filter is placed directly on'a-2-inch -
~
a stainless steel planchet. . The' planchets are then counted for beta activity in a low- l
- background gas flow proportional counter. -Calculation of activity, includes an' empirical :!
self-absorption correction' curve which allows for the change in effective counting ef- - ficiency caused by the residue mass.- Self-absorption is not considered in 'the' case.of' air 1 periculate filters because of the impracticality of accurately weighing' the deposit and. because the penetration depth of' the deposit into the filter. is unknown, q Res u t
-p a + .
(pCi/m ) " .(2.22)(v)(E)(.02832)= i ( 2.22)( v)( E)(.02832) ' Net Activity- Counting Error , where: N = total counts from sample (counts) t = counting time for sample (min)
# = background rate of- counter (cpm) -
2.22 = dpm per pCi! y
= volume of sample analyzed.in. cubic feet calculated from the elapsed time meter '
i E = efficiency of. the counter J 2 = multiple of counting error-. E gh
.02832 = conversion to cubic meters! '
The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. Less than MDL.is reported as the result-when this value is greater than the net activity.- 1 t gl
'r7 ,
E-8 go
I flean Harbors j Each filter paper is placed in a 2-inch diameter planchet and counted using a gas -l
- flow proportional counter, c
~
- Calculation' of Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error: E C C C, . -C b R e s u t. ~. T' b ;
I (pCi/m() " (2.22)(v)(E)(.02832) i ( 2.22)( v)( E)( .02832) ; Net : Activity 1 Counting Error ; where: I
- I C,.
T,.
- total ' gross sample counts (count's)
= sample count time (min):
4
>l
!' Cb = total background count (counts) { Tb = background count time (min) . E- = counting efficiency based on CS-137 - , i y = sample volume in cubic feet calculated from the ,
- elapsed time meter readings and the fbw rate .
. 02832 = conversion to' cubic meters t l 2.22 ~= dpm per pCl 2 = multiple of the counting error i' The'MDL is defined as that value equal'to the two: sigma counting error of the result.
Less than MDL is reported as the result when this .value' is greater than the net activity. q 't ! I , 1 I E-9 .I 1 c l 4
O I B DETERMINATION OF_ GROSS ALPHA. AND/OR BETA ACTIVITY IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES Teledyne Isotopes This describes the process used to measure the radioactiEity of sediment samhles. g~ without identifying the radioactive species, present. No chemical separation techniques g are involved, The sample'is _drN and a one gram allquot is mounted directly on ~a 2-inch stainless steel planchet, The planchets are counted for 50 minutes in a~ low-background gas flow proportional ? counter,- Calculation:of activity includes ~a self-absorption correction for counter ef- f ~ ficiency based on the weight of residue on each planchet. Calculation of Sample' Activity or of the MDL g]; W
, (4)_,
i 2 (y ;(M j i/ ) " 2.22( v)( E) 2.22( v)( E) c Net Ac;ivity-. Counting Error l where: j' N. = total counts from sample (counts)- t = counting time for sample (min)- 'I
# = background rate of counter (cpm)- _
2.22 = dpm per pCi ; y
= volume in liters E = efficiency of the counter-2 = multiple of counting' error ' !
The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result, Less than MDL is reported as the result when this value'is greater than the . measured j result defined above. I 11 11 I I! 1 E-10
!, 'A
e__: L I DETERMINATION OF GROSS BETA - I - ACTIVITIES IN SOIL ~ SAMPLES Clean Harbors I To perform the analyses on both sample types, a 10 gram aliquot'of dried sample is acid leached.1The leachings are filtered and the filtrate diluted to 10 ml; A 2-ml
-; quantity is plancheted, evaporated.'and counted using a gas flow proportional counter. j i
Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error: .!
-j C, C- C, .Cb i b 2 I e I {K N T,'
pdifg)t " (2.22)(E)( A) i (2.22)( E)( A) T' b Net Activity Counting Error
-.I- where: L j
i C, T,
= total gross sampie counts (counts)-
= sample count time (min)
-{
f Cb = tota, background count time __(counts) - ! Tb = k%ou(count time (min) E = counting efficiency based'on CS-137 or uramum ll for the weight of plancheted sample '
-{
A = aliquot analyzed (srams)- _j-2.22 = dpm per pCi 2 = multiple of counting error /i The MDL is defined as that- value equal to' the two sigma. counting error _ of the result. ; Less than MDL is reported as the result when this value is greater than the net activity. l ; I ! l : I g e-Il I
I E DETERMINATION OF I-131 IN MILK ~ AND WATER SAMPLES BY RADIOCHEMISTRY- AND LIQUID PHASE BY ANALYSIS ' Teledyne isotopes The' following describes tLe radiochemical method for determining I-131 activity in milk and water samples by coincidence counting in the liquid phase. Four liters of sample are first equilibrated with stable lodide cariier. ' A batch ^ treatment'with anion exchany resin is?used to remove iodide from the sample. . The iodine is then stripped from the resin'with sodium hypochloride, reduced _with _ hydroxylsmine. hydrochloride, and extracted into carbon; tetrachloride as free iodine.; it is then back-- g E extacted as iodide = into sodium bisulfite solutioni The lodide sample solution is oxidized to the free state using NANO .reapnt and' is extracted several times into a total 'of 15 ml of toluene. A 200 microliter aliquot is taken for determining chemical yield by spectrophotometer. The. decolorizing agent,' 2--
- methyl-2-butene is added to the toluene-iodine solution to form an inert molecule _and to-g 3
minimize liquid scintillation quenching.. A toluene-based liquid scintillation counting solution is added to the sample, which is then analyzed by a-beta-gated samma-coincidence counting sjstem. Calcul: tion of the Sample Activity and-2 Sigma Error:- 2k
. -l I/ ) " ~ 2.22( v)( y)( DF)( E) - i 2.22( v)( y)( DF)( E) j u
Net Activity _. ; Counting Error.. where: l]1 i N = total counts from samplebounts)> t = counting time for sample (.nin) ll Wi
# = background rate of counter (cpm)- 1 2.22 y
- dpm per pCi , g
= volume of sample analyzed (liters) ,
W y = chemical yield of the amount of sample counted 3 DF = decay factor from the collection to the mideount
]
time {e#*"I[ I E = efficiency of the counter for I-131 l 2 = multiple of the~ counting error I . 4 E-12 j Ia
I I NOTE: Efficiency is determined by counting an 1-131 standard. Consequently, the I branching intensity (abundance) of the I-13) gamma does not appear in the above equation. I
~
The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. . Less than MDL is reported as the result when this value is. greater than the net activity. t 9 . I E I g 7 a I 1 i , t , I "-" I
Il, I l Clean Harbors a Analysis for determination of I-131' activity' is ' performed by initially adding lodideL j carrier to an aliquot of sample. - The lodide is concentrated by stirring with lon exchange. l resin, and then purified by extraction into chloroform and back extraction. The. iodide is.
~
1 precipitated as palladium lodide for. counting in a Icw-background beta counter or a beta . gamma coincidence counter.- ' e Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error: .
'C 'C C. o C3
^ ~
t - i ) ". ( 2.22)( A)( E)( y)( DF) i - (2.22)( A)( E)(y)( DF) t Net Activity. Counting Error where: ' C, - = total gross sample counts (counts) T, = sample count time ~(min) Cb = total background counts (counts)
.Tb = background count time-(min)
.l E = counting efficiency for I-131 l
-A- . = aliquot. analyzed (liters). . s. '
y = lodine; yield - DF = decay factor from time of sampling to. the midpoint G of the sample count (e#d*F'I) W 2.22 = dpm per pCi l 2 = multiple of the counting error - The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. Less than MDL is reported as the result when 'this value-is greater than the ' net activity. I y 3' y E-14 1
l 1 DETERMINATION OF STRONTIUM ACTIVITY IN MILK SAMPLES l Teledyne isotopes I To determine strontium activity, stable strontium carrier is added to a one liter aliquot of the sample, followed by the addition of tri-chloracetic acid (TCA) to produce a - curd. The curd is separated by filtration' and discarded. ~An oxalate precipitation is I performed on the filtrate and the precipitate is ashed in a muffle furnace. The ash-'is ' then leached in hydrochloric acid. Calcium and' strontium are precipitated as phosphates. collected by vacuum filtration, then dissolved in nitric acid. Strontium .is precipitated ' as Sr(NOs ): repeatedly using 90% then 7016 nitic acid.' A barium chromate scavenge and I an iron (ferric hydroxide) scavenge are then performed. ' Stable yttrium cr.nb- is added and the sample is allowed to stand for five days or longer for yttrium ingyewth. Tle' yt-trium oxalate is mounted on a nylon planchet and counted in a low level beta counter to infer Sr-90 activity. Sr-89 activity is determined by precipitating SrCO3 from the sample after yttrium separation. The precipitate is ' mounted on aL nylon planchet and cov- 1 ered with an 80 mg/cm3 aluminum absorber. for low level beta counting.
]
Calculation of the Sample Activity and -2 Sigma' Error for Sr-89:' g f + B, + _B A f - B, - Bg 2 hif)" t (2.22)( V)(Y,)(DF,)(E,) A -(2.22)(V)(Y,)(DF,)(E,) Net Activity Counting Error where: N, = total counts from sample (counts) _l t, =_ counting time for sample (minutes)
-l
; B, = background' rate of St-89 counter (cpm)
B r = background _ addition from Sr-90 and ingrowth of Y-90 (see calculation below). 2.22 = dpm per pCi V- = volume analyzed'(liters) - [ Y, = chemical yield of strontium DF, = decay factor for Sr-89 from the mid collection date to counting date (, .01 1&T(days)) E, = efficiency of the Sr-89 counter B l u I ; I g e-Is I
Il Calculation of Background Addition (B A ) from Sr-90 Activity.and from the Inyowth of Y-90' Ny
--B- y
" .(Ey)(IF )( y DF y)( Y,) - 1 -
where:
.l KL = dpm of Sr-90 on the strontium mount - #
g Ny = total Sr-90 counts -(counts) 3;
.= . counting time (min)'
ty ; By = backpound rate of Y-90 counter'(cpm) E-y
= efficiency'of counter' for Y-90 g 5 ]i '
- Y, = chemical' yield of yttrium- .. ,
DF y = the decay. factor' for Y-90 from the ." milk" time to the mid-count; time (e7'**@*""Ib-IF y - = ingrowth factor for'Y-90 from scavenge time to j milking time (1-e'#19@""I[ Wl B4 '- 0.016( K) +l (K)(EyABS)(IGy ) where: K '= dpm of Sr-90'on the strontium mount - EyAss = the efficiency of countingLY-90 through' a-No. 6 absorber - . . O.016 = the efficiency of measuring Sr-90.through a No. 6 absorber . l" ' 5 IGr = the ingrowth: factor for' Y-90 into the. strontium mount from the milk time to the mid-count -j time (1-e'#14@*""I[ = ? B Calculation of Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error for Sr-9Q' N
'B N
.t 7- - By 2
' y
}
Res t y t- y (pC )" (2.22)(V)(Yy )(Y,)(DFy )(IFy )(Ey ) i (2.22)( V)( Yy )( Y,)(DFy )(IFy )(Ey ) ' Net Activity Counting Error
- t
} where-g'# Ny = total counts from yttrium counter (counts) W g By = background rate of yttrium counter (cpm)
- a
- - E-16 ga .;
-_--____i__________--___,-.m... , , . - . _ . - . . . . w. , 5,_,-, , . . - , - , . , , , ,,.3.-
< 11 r
i ty = counting time for sample (minutes)' I 2.22 V-Yy
= dpm per pCl,
- volume analyzed (liters)
= chemical yield of yttrium -
l
- I Y,
_ DFy ,
= chemical yield of strontium
= decay factor of yttrium froin the milking time i
to the midcount time' fi' @*""I) IF y = ingrowth factor for Y-90 from _ scavenge _ time to
' ~
- milking time (1-e'"W@**"I}
E-y = efficiency of yttrium counter; , The MDL is. defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error' of the ' result. , Less than MDL is reported as the result when the value is greater than the_ measured result [
, defined above. -
I L o l} ,
~
E I ' 3 I : t' i: ; I : I E-17 I l
. u.
Ii J DETERMINATION OF STRONTIUM ACTIVITY IN FISH, Il a
- ' SOIL AND VEGETATION SAMPLES: g' Teledyr.e isotopes
~ The sample is dried and then ashed in a muffle furnace. . To determine strontium 'ac-tivity, stable strontium carrier is added and the ' ash is' leached in hydrolic acid. Cal- ,
cium and strontium are precipitated as phosphates, collected by vacuum filtration,' then - dissolved in nitric acid, Strontium is precipitated'as Sr(NO ),' _ 3 repeatedly;using 90%, 3 L then *10% nitic acid. . A barium scavenge is done to remove radium and other natural ' nuclides. Final purification of strontium is accomplished by precipitating SrSo . An ;
iron. scavenge is performed, followed by addition'of stable yttrium carrier and the sample
~
is s!! owed to stand for five days or longer for yttrium inyowth. The yttrium oxalate is-mounted on a nylon planchet and counted in a low level beta, counter to ' infer Sr-90 ac-
- tivity. Sr-89 activity is determined by precipitating SrCO3 from;the sample after' yt- ,
trium separation.- The precipitate.is mounted on a nylon planchet and covered with an f 80 mg/cm8' aluminum absorber for low level . beta counting. - Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error for'Sr-89: Il[ [' + B, + - BA b-B
~B 2' '
i/ ) " ( 2.22)( V)( Y,)( DF,)( E,) _ ( 2.22)( V)( Y,)( DF,)( E,) Net Activity - Counting Error N, = total counts from cample (counts)l t, = counting time for sample (minutes)
- B, - = background rate of Sr-89 ' counter (cpm)'
B A = background addition from Sr-90 and ingrowth of Y-90 (see calculation below)- f 2.22 = dpm per pCl . :i V = volume analyzed (liters) l Y, = chemical yield'of strontium - ( DF, - decay factor for.Sr-89 from the mid collection date to counting date (, .olsteT(days)) . E, = efficiency of the Sr-89 counter i L I, E-18 i . 1
-- , . _ _m_ _ -_ . _ . . - - . ~ - - * . _ . - . . . . - -
-+ . , ~ . , . . - . . . - - + , , < . - , 4
I Calculation of Background Addition (B 4 ) from' St-90 Activity and from the Ingrowth of Y-90t - I -N f - B, K " (E y)(IF )(DF y )(Y y )~ y where: C I K_ Ny ty
= dpm of Sr-90 on the strontium mount
= total St-90 counts (counts)_-
= counting time (min) i By =_ background rate of Y-90 counter (epm)
E, = efficiency of counter for Y-90 Yy =_ chemical. yield of yttrium DF y = the decay factor for-Y-90 from the " milk" time to the mid-count time le'#8"0T@ ""I) IF, - ingrowth- factor for Y-90 from scavenge time to .
. milking time (l-e'#8"0T@'""))
BA = 0.016( K) + (K)(EyABS)(IOy) K : = dpm of Sr-90.on the strontium mount 8 E yAB3 = the. efficiency of counting .Y-90 through a No. 6 absorber 0.016 = the efficiency of measuring Sr-90 through a No. 6 absorber l IGy = the. ingrowth factor for Y-90 into the strontium -l mount from the milk time' to the' mid+ count - l
~
I b "" time (1-e i Calculation of Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error for Sr-90t N- ! I NY # Y B 2 I/ ) " . (2.22)(V)(Y,)(Y,)(DFy )(IFy )(Ey ) i -(2.22)(V)(Yy)(Y,)(DFy )(IF y)(E y) Net Activity Counting Error -i Ny = total counts from yttrium counter (counts) { By = background rate of yttrium counter (cpm) I g E.1, 8
I ty = counting time for sample (minutes) I 2,22 = dpm per pCi V = volume analyzed (liters) Y, = chemical yield of yttrium Y, = chemical yield of strontium DF, = decay factor of yttrium from the milking time to the midcount time (eIND"'I) g IF, = ingrowth factor for Y-90 from scavense time to 5 milking time (l-e'#1 ""I) g E, = efficiency of yttrium counter g The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error of the result. Less than MDL is reported as the result when the value is greater than tha measured result defined above. I u I' I I 1 I Il Ii i I! I Ii E-20 1 I
1 r
- DETERMINATION OF STRONTIUM ACTIVITY-I ,
Clean Harbors A description of the analytical methods, beginning with ' milk samples, used for each-f sample type is presented, followed by' the general formula used' for calculation of the sample activities.' i To a one liter aliquot of milk sample,' strontium and cesium carriers are added. After cesium removnt, the. liquid is made basic and the' strontium is precipitated as oxa- . late. After filtration, the oxalate is muffled and then dissolved.' .The strontium.is
-[
purified by several' precipitations as the nitrate. ' Possible interfering nuclides are- , removed by an iron hydroxide and then a barrium chromate scavenge. The .Y-90 is . separated ! as the hydroxide and then precipitated as the oxalate for. counting in a low-background I beta counter. Prior to precipitation, a known aliquot is taken for. determination of ~the-~ l strontium yield by atomic absorption. An aliquot of vegetation. sample is wet ashed,' and then dry ashed. The ash is then i I acid leached, followed by precipitation of strontium as the ' carbonate. The : carbonate precipitate is dissolved and strontium is purified by.several precipitations as the. nitrate. The procedure for analysis of milk samples is followed from this point. ' Fish
.;~
samples are analyzed by the same procedure as that for vegetation samples ~ An aliquot of soil sample is sieved, followed by the-addition of strot$ tium and ; l cesium carriers. The sample is then leached with hcl, filtered and silicates are removed. l Cesium is then. collected, and the supernate is removed for strontium analysis. Strontium ' is separated from the supernate as strontium oxalate, which is removed by filtration and- , then muffled. This procedure for analysis of milk samples is followed from- this ' point. Calculation of the Sample- Activity and 2 Sigma' Error for St-89 Routini Cy C by C. h R uit C. b C, 7 +tIC.+U+t8 le C.-C.Y t ( / unit the 8 h s b y by go g " (2.22)( E,)( A)(DF,)( Y,)( ABS,) i (2.22)(E,)( A)(DF,)( Y,)( ABS,) Net Activity Counting Error I ; I : e E-21
}
f I
- ,. - . . - . _ - . . . . . . . . .- - . . - .._ .a. i
1 I: :i I; l where C,- = gross Sr-89. counts (counts), l )!
~
t = strontium count time (min)
. d.b. = background counts of strontium' counter.(counts) . Wi tw = background count time of strontium counter (min)- .i 2.22 = 'dpm per pCi- _j E, = Sr-89. counting efficiency ' ,i A- = aliquot (in unit volume or mass)' ._
l DF, = decay factor. for Sr-89 from the sample time to . the midpoint of.the strontium count time : g ,1 [,-misleT(d.re)) .. m .R Y, = strontium- yield by AA' _
' ABSg = St-89 absorption' factor = [( .00125)(W,)+1.05] 'l where: _
W, = weight 'of SrCO, -
. 2- = multiple of counting error .
3
. C,. = net counts due to Sr-90 (dpm) = 1!
Ii g [C - [by s.
.y
( E,') Cs ' ( ABS,')'- gq (Ey )(GFy )(DFy )(y,) Cy. = net ' counts due to Y-90 (dpm) g C [Cy -[by; ( Ey ') (10 7) ; - l ['1 l ( Ey )( GFy )( DFy)( Y,) . t where:
; Cy = gross yttrium counts (counts)-
ty =. yttrium count time (min) , I C by = background counts of yttrium counter (counts) t by = background Count time of yttriuli Counter (min)' .l
' Ey = yttrium counter efficiency - i E,' = Sr-90 counting efficiency 1 E' y = yttrium efficiency in strontium counter ol pr a e wt -
Yy = yttrium yield = carrier weight i ABS,' = Sr-90 absorption factor = [( .004)(W,)+1.12] DF y
)
= decay factor for Y-90 from the time of separation to 1 the midpoint of the count time (c'#1 **0T@*"")) . . _ ,l GF 7 = grow-in factor for Y-90 into the purified St-90 from the ' l l time of the hydroxide scavenge to the time:of yttrium' l
l precipitation . ( 1-e'#l8880T@*"")) IG y = ingrowth factor for Y-90 into the strontliim mount from
]
the milk time to mid-ccunt time (1-e'#2***0T@ "")) E-22 lu i _____--_..-__m____.- _ _.__ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . ______.____mw_m._ *___-v- m.-_m * *m m. _-_m___ --_-_a___a ' w a-+-ee-s_*_'-s-w-n- eer-* we .s
>**4-e -*eemi A m
- ll Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error for SR-90t -
8 C C hr . C y ; Cs, . { t by-2 4 t by8-- I
/u it. %t y iu " (2.22)(Ey )( A)(DFy )(GF,)(Yy )(Y,) i (2.22)(Ey )( A)(DFy )(GFy )(Yy )(y,):
or m Net Activity Counting' Error where: Cy = gross yttrium counts. ! ty = yttrium count time , C by = background counts of yttrium counter [t by = background count time of yttrium counter - -[
- = dpm per pCl-I 2.22 !
Ey =. yttrium counter efficiency- ' A = aliquot (in unit volume or mass); I Y, Y,
= yttrium yield = carrier miW
= strontium yield .by AA -
precipitate ' wt , lI 2 a . multiple of counting' error j DF y = decay factor for Y-90 from the time of separation to - ahe midpoint of the count time (e ""O "")): G F, = grow-in factor for Y-90 into the purified Sr-90 from the L time of the hydroxide scavenge to the time of yttrium precipitation Il-e~"WD""I} ' The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error. of -the result.- ; I Less than MDL is reported as the result when this value is greater than the measured result defined above. I I
.I i
gg 1 I u I E-23 u
;I J
~ - .,
. c j I; 's Ii .;
DETERMINATION OF GAMMA EMITTING RADIOISOTOPES-
-{
Teledyne Isotopes - y Gamma emitting radioisotopes are determined with the use of a lithium' drifted- l, prmanium (GeLi)~ and high' purity germanium' detectors with high resolution spectrometry in W .;
. specific media; such as, air particulate filters, charcoal filters, milk and water. Leach:
sample to be assayed is' prepared andl counted in standard geometries -such as one liter ;! wrap-around Marinelli . containers, 300 ml or- 150 mi bottleaf or'.2-inch filter (paper source 4 U( geometries. c
. Samples'are counted on large (>55 cc volume) GeLi detectors connected'to Nuclear '
' Data 6620 data acquisition and computation systems, All resultant spectra are stored on ;
magnetic tape. ! The' analysis of each sample consists of calculating the specific activities of all detected radionnelides or the detection.llmits from.a standard list' of nuclide1, Thel Gell systems are calibrated for each standard geometry using certified radionuclide" standards i l traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error:' - e Net pCi/ "0) - B O) d 0)
- Of vol. or mass ,, 2.22( V)(Eg ))( BI)(DFg ))(t) .1 2.22(V)(Eg ))(BI)(DFg ))(t) .
Net ' Activity Counting Error -- I where: N)g = area, in counts, of a special region containing a-j' gamma emission of the nuclide of interest. NOTE: If the detector exhibits a peak in this' region when counting a blank (i.e.', - from natural background (BB)(t)..is subtracted from N :before using the above - g equation. BB is' the count rate of the blank, cpm, in the background peak. g B)g = background counts in the region 'of. Interest, calculated by fitting a straight line across the region. connecting the two adjacent region. H t = counting interval of sample, minutes 2.22- = dpm per pCi lj V = volume or mass of. sample analyzed W L E)g = efficiency of counter at the energy region of interest . k L BI = branching intensity of the nuclide at the gamma emission-energy under consideration '" ' 11 E-24 I by
I DFg) _ = decay factor for nuclide j from sample collection time to midpoint of the counting interval (eMd*"II 2 = multiple of_ counting error
~
The MDL is defarxi as that _value equal to the two sigma coun~ ting error of._ the result.- I ess than' MDL is reported as the result when this value is greater than the measured ! I result defined above. '1
..q l
I ! g a i a I . a B 1 o l - I 5 5 i
- - E-25 i
1
I E Clean Harbors The procedure for detection of pmma emitting radio. isotopes pnerates high resolu-tion gamma spectra which are used for quantitative determination and identification. Standard geometries have been established to maximize efficiency, for all sample types; primarily air particulate filters, water, vegetation, soil, sediment, and fish. A description of the analytical methods, beginning with air particulates used for each sample type is presented, followed by the general formula used for calculation of the sample activities. Air particulate samples from each location are placed in a petri dish and counted on GeLi detectors connected to a multichannel analyzer and micro-computer. Spectra are stored first on floppy disk, then on magnetic tape. Water and milk samples are placed into the appropriate sized container, depending on the volume of sample available. The preferred volume is 3.5 liters. The samples are counted and spectra are stored as with air particulate samples. Vegetation samples are packed tightly in a tared container and weighed. Samples that contain excess liquid due to preservatives or decomposition are drained before weigh-ing, and then returned to the container for counting. Samples such as grass are air dryed l W to remove surface moisture before weighing and counting. Samples are counted and spectra stored as with air particulate samples. Soil samples are dried prior to weighing. An aliquot of dried sample is placed in a marinelli beaker and counted and spectra stored as with air particulate samples. Fish samples from each location are placed into marinelli beakers for counting. The aliquot size may vary, depending on availability of sample, up to 4 liters. The samples are counted and spectra stored as for air particulate samples. I I I!l I E-26 I
g
)
Calculation of the Sample Activity and 2 Sigma Error.
-[Pg) - B g)] (M)(E ))(G)(,06) g 2
$ [P g) + Bg)] (M)(E )g (G)(.06);
( A)(T)[DFg)) ( A)(T)[DFg)) where: I P)- g = number 'of gross counts in peak channels ; j i
- for .nuclide 'j B)g = number of background counts in peak channels' for nuclide.j M. = relative GeLi efficiency (GeLi: !=l) - {l l E)g = pCi/ cpm for' nuclide j i G = geometry factor for. deviation from I liter in volume -
A = aliquot sir.e in unit volume (varies according to . .j sample type) _ . 1 T = time counted in kiloseconds . i
.06 = conversion to minutes! :
~
= decay factor for nuclide J from time of sampling-DFg)
.to time of counting {hO*"))- !
t 2
~
= multiple of counting error - i The MDL is defined as that value equal to the two sigma counting error 'of: the' result. -
8 Less than MDL is reported as the result when this value is greater than the measured -
~
l 4 result defined above. 1 I 1 1 l l s s 4 g e.2, g .
- s .
s
4 I
;I; ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY al
' ; Teledyne Isotopes: g!j d
, Teledyne Isotopes dosimeters are rectangular teflon wafers impregnated 'with= 25% _
j CaSO4Dy phosphor.l They are annealed in a hot air oven prior to use and are inserted , into black polyethylene pouches.' .The filled poucha are labelled and placed in rec-- tangular holders which contain copper shielding to filter out' low energy radiation. AfterL g -; exposure in the ' environment,' four separate areas of the dosimeter are read in 'a Teledyne B" Isotop- m@l g300 TLD reader. The dosimeter is then re-irradiated by a standardized - Cs-137~ source and.the four ' areas are t'end again. Calculation of the environmental ex-'- posure is performed by computer, using the re-irradiation readings to determine the-g g sensitivity of each area of the dosimeter. The reading of control dosimeters are sub-tracted to allow for transit dose and system background. A. ~ For any given area' of the dosimeter, the dose mR is calculated;by the formula: '! s : Dose = R (h) avcontrol-where: R = initial reading of- lthE ares .
'gJ BO RR = second reading of the area (after re-irradiation) , d redose = re-irradiation dose in :mR;' i avcontrol - = average of control values calculated as explained ';
below. If no controls arejused,' avcontrol = 0' -- i and poss exposures result , B. Each area of each control is calculated by the formula: q se cdose = cr (C'(r where: 1 cdose = control area dose in mR' cr = initial reading of the control area _ . _ q crr = second reading of the control' area (after t g credose re-irradation) _ . g ;'
= re-irradiation dose.of-the control dosimeter in mR The average of control values is then calculated from all four areas of all controls _ by, the formula: l:j}j 5
n 4N 3-l E cdose avcontrol = I 4N gj I E.2g g
'i i
I where: 1
-N = total number of control dosimeters 'i C. The average and standard deviation of the area readings for each dosimeter are calcu-8 ; lated by standard methods.~
D. Using the criteria that if_ one standard deviation is' greater than- 10% of the average. of the four readings and that if the value of one area is outside the range of 3" standard deviations of the average of the other three areas, then'that- area will be I ' eliminated and the results will- be based on the remaining areas.- 4
-g i 2
I 1 I j B y 1
-1 4
E-29 I 1
-{
s:- . ___.____._____._.,-_____.-,.- 5
, f ,
1 I l T ' 1
/i.
s I* i l i 3.,., ; 'f t -
- j< ., , ly}
'/
l 3 t s
. t, l 1
't
} , ;{
L li 3_ i 'I s s, k, - l i4 F
, ', (3 ,4 c _'
1 . a
- t. t t
h
. 4
- t-
; QUALITY CONTROL.
h$ st; u 4 3
.' h,,
l l' t I , II. -'3
.s sh 4-
.,3 y
I-
?
.. i
}
I ; I
' ,t I
'1
.k i .
i W sb
, i,.
8
- 3 c,," _' - h l.' 3 4 ,!.
i I -} , . 1 2 O**ft' b N *- er - er eh+ -'emb, w e- r --ese-me --N d onep. re- h e w- e.iw w e e-a Wer f ergme % R.W e ew T v w'_ __ . _ f -.WW pegW r*we k D 44-* W f T TaS Pww*W*Mei'f F "9 "
ll l APPENDIX F: INTER LABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM T1 and CH participate in the EPA Radiological Inter-laboratory Comparison (cross eneck) Program. This participation includes analyses on various sample media as found in the Peach Bottom REMP. This participation provides an objective measurement of analytical precision and accuracy as well as a bias estimation of.the results are obtained. Examination of the data shows that the vast majority were within the EPA control limits. Each case of exceeding the control limits was investigated. There is no evidence to suggest systematic errors. For CH the results from participation in the EPA program are the basis for continued certification by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in radiologica1 ' analysis. l
i ll ! I1 i
. Table T.1 I! +
EPA Intercomparison Samples Clean Harbors Analytical Services } l Page 1 of 12 ' Cross Alpha and Beta Samnle No. Samnle Date Samnle Tvee Crona Alnha- Croan Beta 8901181 01/20/89 Water (a) 8 5 { 8 6 : i l- 1 ! Lab Avg. 8(0): 6(1) gi EPA Known.
' EPA Cr. Avg.
8(5,9,0)' 8(2,0) 4(5,9,1) 5(2,0) W 8904074 03/31/89 Air Filter (b) <76 (Note 10) 75
?Y g-Lab Avg. 7.', ( 2 )
' EPA Known 62(5,9,4) g
! EPA Gr. Avg. 63(8,4) 8904169 04/18/89 Water (a) 44' ' (Note 5) 45
~hl Lab Avg. 46(2).
Ei'A Known . 29(7,12,4) I EPA Cr. Avg. 26(7,5) 5 8904194 04/18/89 Water (a) 62 71 iQ Lab Avg. 64(5,9) l, EPA Known 57(5,9,3) W, EPA Cr. Avg. 50(8, 4) I 8905128 05/12/89 Water (a) 24 43 1 26 45 21 41-Lab Avg. 25(1) 45(3) EPA Known 30(8,14, 1)- 50(5,9,-2) l W, l EPA Gr. Avg. 28(8. 1) 50(8, 2) i 8909135 08/25/89 Air Filter (b) 5 5 i Lab Avg. 6(1) EPA Known 6(5,9,0) EPA Cr. Avg. 7(2,0) ll I' .
I , l I Table F 1. - I EPA' Intercoraparison Samplea Clean Harbors Analytical Services Page 2 of'12.
.j Cross Alpha and Beta-I 1
Samnle No. Samole Date Sa=nle Tvra Cross Aloha Cream Beta ! I 8909226 09/22/89 Water (a) 2 2 2, 8-8' 12 f i
~ Lab Avg. '2(1)i 9(1) l EPA Known. 4(5.9, 1) 6(5,9,1)
I EPA Cr, Avg. :4(2, 1) 7(2,1). i 8911060 10/31/89 Water (a)
.I (Note 16) 23 26' 2.1 -
l3 Lab Avg. 25(2). ; g EPA Known. 49(12,21, 3) ' EPA Cr. Avg, 45(11, 3) I 8911059 10/31/89 Water (a) 24 25 2h' t .I l Lab Avg. EPA Known EPA Cr. Avg, 24(1) 32(5,9, 3) 31(4, 2)-
')
I Note: (a) pCi/1 (b) pCi/ filter [ I . LI l I . t e I ; I - _ . .. . _ . . . . . . _ . . . . . , . . - , - - ~ . , , , . . . . - - - . _,
. ~. . . . -. -- - - . - - -- . ., - -
i I! t
't Table T.1 1 EPA Intercomparison Samples j Clean Har*> ors Analytical Services '
-Page 3 of 12 c- 3; S anie No. Eganis Data h ;
8904194
- 04/18/89- Water I(; ?
- This van previously recorded in 2nd Quarter as 8901181. !
Nuclide (pci/1) 25 Nuclide (pci/1) 21 Il : Cs-134 18 cm 137 12 g 21 . .11 g! Lab Avg. 22(4) Lab Avg. 17(5) ; EPA Known 20(5,9,1) EPA Known 20(5,9,1) r EPA Gr. Avg. 19(3,1) EPA Gr.' Avg. '20(2, 1). 8902113 02/10/89. Water Nuclide (pCi/1) 237 Nuclide (pC1/1)- 10. l. Cr 51 192 & &A 9 121 2 ' Lab Avg. 207(26) Lab Avg. 9(1) EPA Known 235(24,42. 2) EPA Known 10(5,9,0) . EPA Gr. Avg. 233(20,.2) EPA Gr. Avg. 11(2,0) . Nuclide (pCi/1) 161 Nuclide-(pci/1). 154 I ' h 61 165 Ru 106 ~ 138 162 . 110 l, Lab Avg. 162(3) Lab Avg. 154(16)- EPA Known 159(16,28,0)- EPA Known 178(18.31. 2) EPA Gr. Avg. 160(12,0) EPA Gr. Avg. 171(15 -2) ; Nuclide (pCi/1) 8 Nuclide-(pCi/1) 7 : Cs 134 8 Cs-137 8 ig n' Lab Avg. 9(1) Lab Avg. 9(2) .
.4 EPA Known 10(5,9,0) EPA Known- 10(5.9,0)
EPA Gr. Avg. 10(2,0) EPA Gr. Avg. 11(2,-1) 8904074 03/31/89 Air Filter I Nuclide (pCi/ filter) 21 L Cs 137 25 ) M f Lab Avg. 26(26) J ( EPA Known 20(24,42 2) ti i. EPA Gr. Avg. 21(20,-2) I
, - , , , _ . , , - ,,-v .. - - , - . . , , . , - - ,, a .r + + --e e
_ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ . - . _ - - _ _ - . _ . _ . - . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . i i I I Table F 1 ' I EPA Intercomparison Samples Clean Harbors Analytical Services Page 4 of 12
,{
~
I Camma i Samnle No. $*= ale Data M 8905008 04/28/89 Milk Nuclide (pci/1) 3 51 Nuclide (pC1/1) 1720 : Cs 137 51 K:.6,,Q 1880 l g .gg , Lab Avg. 48(5) lab ' Avg'.- 1690(207) EPA Known f 50(5,9,-1) EPA Known 1600(80.139,2)- t EPA Cr. Avg. 50(3, 1) EPA Cr. Avg. 1646(119,1) . . I iI ;
- 3 :
I 1 I I ; I I . I ; I 1 I. 4 y- + - .-- - - . . . . . . , , . - ~. ~ - - , , , a,-, ,, .,
I I Tabi, F 1 I EPA Intercomparison Samples Clean Haibors Analytical Services Page 5 of 12 Gamma Samnle No. Samnle Data Iygg 8906098 06/09/89 Water Nuclide(pci/1) Nuclide (pCi/1) 29 Ba 133 (Note 14) M '29 g H g Lab Avg. Lab Avg. 31(3) EPA Known 49(5,9) EPA Known '31(5,9,0) EPA Gr. Avg. 48(5) EPA Cr. . Avg.- 31(3,0) Nuclide (pCi/1) 172 Nuclide (pCi/1) 112' g M 174 Ru 106 99 g ul lh Lab Avg. 168(9) Lab Avg. 115(18) g EPA Known 16$(17.29,0) EPA Cr. Avg. 167(11,0) EPA Known-
' EPA Cr. Avg.
~128(13,23, 2) 123(14~, 1) g Nuclide (pci/1) 46 Nuclido (pci/1) 23 Cs 134 45 Cs 137 '21 E
5 M -
'11.
Lab Avg. 46(1) Lab Avg. '20(3) g EPA Known 39(5,9,2) EPA Cr. Avg. 37(3,3) EPA Known. EPA Gr. Avg. 20(5,9,0)- 21(2,0) g 8909135 08/25/89 Air Filter Nuclide (pci/ filter) 15 Ca.:.U.Z 16 D Lab Avg. 15(1) EPA Known 10(5,9,2) EPA Gr Avg. 11(2,2) I I I I
-_ . _ _ . .~ . ._ . .-. -. . - - - .- .. .
I i l I t I Table F 1 3 EPA Intercomparison Samples i g Clean Harbors Analytical Services I Page 6 of.12 , Gamma . I* Samole No. Samnie Date Iggg
.8910089 10/06/89 Water
}
Nuclide(pC1/1) 762 Nuclide (pci/1) 51; , Ba 133 748 GadtQ 56 I-(Note 15) 112. (Note 15) 22 Lab Avg. 801(79) _ 14% Avg. 51(S)- EPA Known 59(6,10,-214) EPA Known '30(5,9,7) . EPA Gr. Avg. 58(5,212) EPA Gr. Avg. 30(2,7) Nuclide (pCi/1) Nuclide (pCi/1) I 247 237 .; IJ111 233 Ru 106 . 263 (Note 15) 21Q (Note 15) 3.lfi Lab Avg. 237(9) ~ Lab Avg. 272(40) EPA Known 129(13,23,-14) EPA Known' 161(16,28,12) I~ EPA Gr. Avg. 129(9,14) EPA Gr. Avg. 153(14.13) Nuclide (pCi/1) I Cs 134 (Note 15) Lab Avg. 55 60 19, Nuclide (pci/1) Ca 137
._( Note 15)
'105 99-1Q1' . i 58(3) Lab Avg. 104(5)
I EPA Known EPA Gr. Avg. 29(5,9,10) 27(3,10) EPA Known EPA Gr. Avg. 59(5.9,16) 61(4,15)- , 8911059 10/31/89 Water Nuclide (pCi/1) 6 Nuclide (pCi/1) 6-Cs 134 6 Cs-137 I 7 i 2 i Lab Avg. 6(1) Lab Avg. 7(1) EPA Known 5(5,9,1) EPA Known 5(5.9.1) EPA Cr. Avg. 5(1,0) EPA Cr. Avg. 6(2,0)
-I k
I I I . . . -. - . .. . . . .
Il ! Table F 1 EPA Intercomparison Samples l Clean Harbors Analytical Services
- Page 7 of 12 ,
Sr 89 and Sr 90' l
?
Samnle No. Samnle Date Samnle Tvon M Sr.90 8901045 01/06/89 Water (a) 53 '24 : (Note 2) '37 25 ;
'M 21- ';
Lab Avg.' 47(9). 25(1) EPA Known 40(5,9,3) 25(2,3,0)- EPA Gr. Avg. 38(8,3) 24(2,0) 8904074 03/31/89 Air Filter (b) 31 ; (Note 13) 33 : D ' Lab Avg.- 32(1) - 20(2,3,14) ' EPA Known EPA Gr. Avg. 19(3,15) 8904194 04/18/89 Water fa) 11 9
.12 10 Lab Avg.
EPA Known 1 11(2;' 8(5,9,1)
~n 10(1) 8(2,3,2) l; '
EPA Gr. Avg. 8(2,1) 8(1,3) , 8905008 04/28/69 Milk (a) 37 54' (Note 4) 55 55 M il Lab Avg. 48(10) ,, 52(4) EPA Known 39(5,9,3) 55(3,5,2) , EPA Gr. Avg. 35(9,5) 53 (5,:-1) 8905069 05/05/89 Water (a) 7 8 9 8 m-1 2 -g~ Lab Avg. 8(1) 8(1) - EPA Known 6(5,9,1) 6(2,3,3) EPA Gr. Avg. 6(1,1) 6(1,3) I; . i l l l l^ . . , , I .
I I Table F 1 I EPA Intercomparison Samples Clean Harbors Analytical Services Page 8 of 12 Sr.89 and Sr.90 Samnle No. Samnle Date Sa= ale Tyne M I ig-Al
~
8909159 09/15/89. Water (a) '12 9 12 9 I Lab Avg. EPA Known 11 12(1) 14(5.9. 1) lQ 9(1) 10(2,3 1) EPA Gr. Avg. 13(2,0) 9(1,0) 8911059 10/31/89 Water (a) -14 .5 13 5 15L 1 B ,tb Avg. 14(1) 5(0) 1PA Known 15(5,9,0) 7(2,3, 2) I EPA Cr. Avg. 14(3,0) 7(1 2). I I Note: (a) pCi/1 (b) pCi/ filter I . I ; I I I I I I ' ' ' '
- - - , , . . . . , , , , , . -..,,--is
l l I Table F 1 EPA Intercomparison Samples Clean Harbors Analytical Services Page 9 of 12 l Iodine 131 5 Samole No. Samnle date Sa=nle Tvue 1-131 (oci/1) 8908070 08/04/89 Water 76 76 Lab Avg. 22 75(2) h W EPA Known 83(8,14. 2) EPA Gr. Avg. 84 ( 8 , '" 8902185 02/17/89 Water 88 (Note 11) 88 Lab Avg. li h W 90(4) EPA Known 106(11,19 -2) EPA Gr. Avg. 106(7, 3) I I I I I I I I I I
.t I
i i I i Table F.1 . l, l W EPA Intercomparison Samples ' , Clean Harbors Analytical Services ;, , Page 10 of 12 i- ! Urantua , Samnie No. Samnie date Sa= ale Tvon Uranium (nci/1) i 8904069 ( 03/17/89- Water 3 i L 2 . 2 1 g Lab Avg; 3(1)' i 3 EPA Known 5(6,10,.1) 1 EPA Gr. Avg. 5(2,.1)- 4 8904169 04/18/89 Water 14 I (Note 7) 14-11 'g Lab Avg. 14(1)- 1 l 3 EPA Known 3(6.10,3)
- EPA Gr. Avg. 3(2,3)-
!I 8907184 07/21/89 Water 22'- (Note 9) -22 ; 21. I Lab Avg. 22(1) EPA Known ~41(6,10, 3) I 8911060 10/31/89 EPA Gr. Avg. Water 39(6,-5) 9
.l 10 I
i lQ Lab Avg. 10(1)
- EPA Known 12(6,10,-1)
EPA Gr. Avg. 11(2,-1) I. > 8911197 11/17/89 Water I 11
- 11 i 11 Lab Avg. 11(0)
I EPA Known 15(6,10,-1) ' EPA Gr. Avg. 15(3, 1) i I I
'I .
I .
B I. Table F 1 g EPA Intercoa.parison Samples Clean Harbors Analytical Services g Page 11 of 12-B
- 1. Ra.226 and Ra 228 were both outside acceptable limits for 8812143.- Raw da .c counting data, and calculations were checked and no problems were g fond. 'Ra 226 and Ra.228 yields and' spike recoveries'have been monitored and are usually acceptable.
g The Ra 226 procedure has. been roviewed with . the ' analyst. Ra.226 and Ra.228 yields and spike. . recoveries will continue to be monitored.
- 2. Sr 89 was checked for errors and no problems with the data were found.
- 3. Ra 226 and Ra 228 were both outside acceptable limits for 8904002.
(See Note 1)
- 4. Sr 89 was checked for errors and no problems with the data were found.
- 5. CHAS's Alpha result was higher than the EPA's result. The data was checked and no problems were found. Spikes are being monitored.-
- 6. Ra 226 and Ra 228 were both outside acceptable limits for 8904169. ,
(See Note 1)
- 7. CHAS's uranium values for 8904069 were reportet. incorrectly to the EPA.
L.e actual results (3.2.3) were within EPA's acceptance criteria,
- d. Ra 226 was outside acceptable limits for 8907106. This n.aybe due to low emanation on the apparatus.
- 9. Urantua. values for 8907184 were outside acceptable limits. All raw data-.
was verified and found to be correct. There may have been a possible dilution error.
- 10. CHAS did not report the alpha results due to'a scheduling oversight.
CHAS found no problenis with the Beta results. The instrument has been recalibrated. 11, CHAS verified all calculations and found no discrepancies. Our Celi analysis confirmed our chemistry result. There may have been a possible dilution problem. -
- 12. CHAS verified all calculations and found no discrepancies. No sample was left for. reanalysis.
- 13. CHAS used the incorrect C.1. date to calculate the strontium values reported to the EPA. When using the correct C l, date our results are ]
acceptable. This is the first time CHAS cerformed strontium analysis on ' this type of air filter. 14 ~ . - I]
I Table F 1 EPA Intercomparison Samples clean Harbors Analytical Services Page 12 of 12
- 4. CHAS did not analysis for Ba 133 because it is not a nuclide we calculate.
- 15. CHAS was probably outside acceptance criteria due to.a dilution error. '
- 16. The alpha calculation was checked for error and no problems were found.
A calibration check was run during 2/90 and new efficiencies established.
.I I
I i I , I I I I I ' I I 1 I ! I
l TABLE F-2 INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS. 1989 TElEDYNE ISOTOPES (Page 1 of 3) CoBection Sequence TeleJyne W3 Devention All Partietyent Date No. Reedia Nuclide EPA Results(e) lootopes Results(b) Grand Avg. Known R$een i 2 s.d 10/18/88 503 Water Cs- 134 15.00 1 8.66 15.67 1 3.45 e..e6 0.23 14.34 1 3.48 Cs-137 15.00 t 8.66 16.33 i 9.63 0.21 0.46 15.72 1 3.38 01/20/89 507 Water Gross Alpha 8.00 i 8.66 8.00 1 3.00 0.40 0.00 7.88 i 4.52 Gross Peta 4.00 1 8.66 6.00 i 0.00 0.21 0.69 5.41 1 3.56 01/06/89 508 Water Sr-89 40.00 i 8.66 37.00 1 7.95 -0.36 -1.04 38.04 i 15.54 Sr-90 25.00 i 2.60 26.00 i 6.00 1.86 1.15 24.39 i 3.94 02/IN*M 510 Water Cr.51 235.00 1 41.56- 245.67 i 35.16 0.93 0.77 232.71 1 40.50 Co-60 10.00 i 8.66 12.67 i 15.46 0.70 0.92 10.65 i 4.18 ' Zn 159.00 1 27.71 181.33 i 16.53 (d) 2.29 2.42 160.15 1 23.58 4 Ru-lO6 178.00 1 31.18 191.00 1 29.55 1.91 1.25 171.19 i 30.24
, Cs-134 10.00 1 8.66 10.33 i- 1.74 0.21 U.12 9.73 i 3.78 Cs-137 10.00 1 8.66 13.67 i 1.74 1.01 1.27. 10.74 1 3.78 i
02/17/89 511 Water I-131 106.00 i 19.05 98.67 i' l.74 -1.19 -1.15 .106.20 i 14.38 02/24/S9 512 Water H -3 - 2754.00 1 616.61 286L.671 754.98 0.70 0.55 2722.79 1549.12 03/31/89 515 Air Filt- Gross Alpha 21.00 1- 8.66 28.67 i 3.45 te) 2.09- 2.66 22.64 i 8.64 Omss Beta 62.00 i 8.66 65.76 i .4.59 0.88 1.27 63.14 i 16.42 Sr-90 20.00 1 2.60 19.67 i 6.24 0.53 0.38 19.21 i 5.50.
- Cs-137 20.00 i 8.66 18.00 1 3.00 -1.15 -0.69 21.31 i 7.74
- 05/12/89 516 Water Gross Alpha 30.00 i 13.86 28.67 i 3.45 0.22 -0.29 27.64 i 15.02 Gross Beta 50.00 i 8.66. 52.00 1 5.19 0.59 0.69 50.31 i 16.04 04/18/89 517 Water ' Gross Beta - 57.00 i 8.66 53.00 i 10.83 0.89 -I.39 50.42 i 14.90 Sr-89 8.00 8.66 8.001 ~ 'O.00 0.05 0.00 7.87 i 3.80
. Sr-90 . 8.00 1 2.60 7.67 i 1.74 .-0.13 - -0.38 7.78 1 2.32
, Cs-134 . 20.00 i 8.66 19.67 4.59 0.19 -0.12 19.12 1 5.42 Cs-137 20.00 :8.66 20.00 1 7.95 -0.08 0.00 20.24 2 4.58 9 04/28/89 518 Milk Sr-89 39.00 i 8.66 36.67 i -3.45 0.73 -0.81 34.56 i 17.56 Sr-90 55.00 1 5.20. 56.33 i 4.59 .1.88 0.77 53.07 i 10.90 Cs-137 50.00 A 8.66' 53.33 i 6.93 1.20 1.15 49.86 i 6.28 4 K '1600.00 i 138.56- . 1760.00 340.74 (f) 2.48 ~ 3.46 1645.58 238.28 Footnotes are located at the erxl of hble. E E E .. E E. E E E E E E E -E E E E E E E _ - - __ . . _ _ . _ . _ _ . . . . _ _ . _ ~ _ .___ - . _ _ .
E E E E ,E .. E E E E E E E- E E ~ E. E E E TABLE F-2 INTER-L ABORATORY COMPARISONS. 1989
'IELEDYNE ISOTOPES (Page 2 of 3)
Teledyne Norm =Mmed Deviation AII Participant CeBeetion Segenence Known RBeen i 2 s.d No. BSedia NacHde EPA Resulte(s) Isotopes Resedte@) Grand Avg. Date Water Gross Alpha 29.00 i 12.12 21.33 i 6.93 -I.09 -1.90 25.75 i 14.84 ' 04/18/89 519 0.87 3.47 1 0.69 0.17 -0.12 :s.42 1 0.10 Ra-226 3.50 1 Ra.228 3.60 1 0.87 3.60 1 0.30 -0.76 0.00 3.82 i 1.54 U 3.00 i 10.39 3.00 0.00 -0.09 0.00 3.31 1 3.42 520 Water Sr-89 6.00 1 8.66 6.33 i' I.74 0.15 O.12 5.90 i 2.96 05/05/89 2.60 1.74 0.89 0.38 5.56 i 1.70 Sr-90 6.00 1 6.33 i 521 Water Ba- 133 49.00 i 8.66 33.00 i 10.83 (g) -5.05 -5.54 47.58 i 10.24 06/09/89 7.95 -0.36 -0.35 31.04 1 5.76 Co-60 31.00 i . 8.66 30.00 i Zn-65 165.00 1. 29.44 165.33 i 1.74 -0.16 0.03 166.87 i 22.92 Ru-106 128.00 i 22.52 113.67 i 52.50 + l .29 -I.91 123.31 1 27.28 Cs-134 M.00 t S.66 34.00 i 7.95 -1.13 -1.73 37.26 i 6.58 Cs-137 LO.00 i 8.66 22.00 i 10.83 0.37 0.69 20.92 i 4.46' 522 Water 11-3 4503.00 t 779.42 4466.67 i 458.25 -0.09 -0.14 4491.17 1768.26 06/23/89 08/uU 39 525 Water I-131 83.00 i 13.86 79.33 i 12.12 -1.10 -0.79 84.4I i 7.58 527 Air Filter Cross /Jpha ~ 6.00 i 8.66 8.33 i- 2.98 0.63 0.81 ? 6.51 1 3.12 08/23/89 Gross Beta -Irwalidated by EPA I-131 - Invalidated by EPA Cs-137 10.00 i 8.66 12.00 i 3.00 0.42 0.96 10.79 i 3.92 528 Water Gross Alpha 4.00 i 8.66' 5.00 1 0.00 0.21 0.35 4.38 i 3.64 09/22/89 0.00 0.45 0.69 6.70 i .3.66 Gross Beta 6.00 1 - 8.66 8.00 i 529 Water 11 3 3496.00 i 630.46 - 3433.33 i 173.22 -0.18 - -0.30 3471.07 1738.15 10/20/89 530 Water Ba-133 59.00 i_ 10.39 51.00 i M.08 (h) -1.94 -2.31 57.72 i 10.18 10/06/89 6.24 0.06- 0.23 30 49 i 4.98 Co-60 . 30.00 i 8.66 30.67 i Zn-65 129.00 1 - 22.52 128.33 i 8.67 0.05 -0.09 128.71 i 17.56 Ru-106 161.00 1 27.71 139.00 1 47.16 -1.49 -2.38 152.74 i ?7.14 Cs-134 29.00 i 8.66 23.67 i 3.45 - 1.27 - -1.85 27.34 i 5.66 Os-137 59.00 i E.66 61.67 1 4.59 0.10 0.92- 61.37i 8.96 Footnotes are locatni at the c x! of table. c . _ - . _ - -
. , , . . . . . . . A TABLE F-2 INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISONS. 1989 TELEDYNE ISOTOPES.
(Page 3 of 3) Conection sequence Teledyne NonnaHaed Devietton AIE Pterticipant Date Reedle Naclkle EPA Results(a) Isotopes Resultslb) Grand AN. Known Egeen i 2 s.d - _ No. 532 Water Gross Alpha 49.00 1 20.78 42.33 i 17.31 -0.40 0.96 45.13 i 22.14 10/31/89 -0.IO -0.58 30.61 1 7.98 Gross Beta 32.00 i 8.66 30.3'3 i 1.74 Sr-89 15.00 t 8.66 15.00 i 10.38 3.30 0.00 14.14 i 5.94 Sr-90 7.00 1 2.60 7.00 1- 0.00 0.53 0.00 6.54 1 2.28 Cs-134 5.00 1 8.66 5.33 i 3.45 0.07 0.12 5.51 1 2.78 Cs-137 5.00 1 9.66 7.00 1 0.00 0.37 0.69 5.93 1 3.42 01/26/90 533 Water ' Gross Alpha 12.00 1 8.66 10.00 1 5.19 -0.52 -0.69 12.30 i 18.40 Gross Beta 12.00 i 8.66 12.33 1 4.59 -0.20 0.12 14.96 1 23.20 Flootnotes-(a) EPA Results - Expected laboratory precision (3 sigma). Units are pCf/1 for water and milk except K is in mg/l. (b) Teledyne Results - Average i 3 sigma. Units are pCl/l for water and milk except K is in mg/L Units are total pCi for air particulate filters. (c) Urlts for food analysta are pCl/kg except K w".nich is mg/kg. (d) De three Zn-65 measurements were 104,175 and 185 pC1/ liter. These were measured on three detectors using the same alkguM. The other reported results (Cr 51. Co-60. Ru-106. Cs-134. Cs-137) were all within two starulani deviations of the EPA results. His wouki k.dicate that the dilution made was correct (except that possibly the 2n-65 was not well mixed). Other parameters were investigated. De branching intensity, decay factor, and detection efHelencies were checked. Since one of the Co-60 gamma ray energies is only 60 kev from Zn-65, the detector effweb must be correct. Dere is no obvious reason for the deviation. Another aliquot was counted yleiding 165 pCI/I. (e) De EPA deposits activity on the fHter over a small diameter (nearly a point source) whereas our calibration is based on a deposit nearly 2 inches in diameter. In order to correct to point source geometry our practice has been to divide our results by 1.2. We neglected to do it on this test. (f) There is no apparent reason why the pMassium was high. Three separate detectors were used and the K-40 vahne for each was correctl, swd by 0.86 to corwert to potassium in mg/IEer. (g) There is no apparent reason why Ba-133 was low by 5.5A standard deviation while the other Isotopes were within i 2 standard deviation ^ ihe
' deterl r efficiencies and Ba-133 branching intensities were checked and found to be correct. On 19/31/89. 300 ml of the original. undiluted sample was counted giving 43.9 i 5.8 pCl/l of Ba-133.'
(h) his EPA samples was counted in two geometries: one in diluted stage the other undiluted. There was no signillmnt difference. Comparing detector elikWKu between two annuel sets dkl not reveal any signifiant uiference. Thus there is no apparent reason why our results differed as much as they dkl.- M M E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E
. . . _ . ~ .. .. .-..-
lI I I I I 1 I I PBAPS SURVEY I -I I
i i APPENDIX G: PBAPS SURVEYS I A Land Use Census around the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS) was conducted by Philadelphia Electric Company to comply with 8 Section 3/4.8.E.2 of PBAPS's Technical Specifications. The survey was concucted during the May to October 1989 growing season. The results of l this survey are summarized in Table G-1. There were no changes required to the PBAPS REMP as a result of this survey. I I I I I I I I Il l 1 l m, J% rm
i ; i TABLE G.1 LOCATION OF THE NEAREST MILK PRODUCING ANIMAL WITHIN A FIVE i MILE RADIUS OF PBAPS, 1989 l l
- i. DISTNACE(FT.) E!
SECTOR FROM VENT E, j . f j N 18,500 l NNE 10,700 : NE 11,200 ENE 10,900 , ! E 19,700 ESE 17,000 [ l SE 24,000 i SSE S 15,900 l! : SSW '6,900 : l SW 11,600 i i i WSW 12,400
- W 6,000 -
l WNW 8,400 1 NW 17,900 l NNW . ! i I1 INDICATES NO MILK ANIMALS LOCATED
- I
- li 4
- g,
- - .. -- _- _ _. - _ - . - .}}