ML20042F663
| ML20042F663 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/13/1990 |
| From: | Randy Hall, Konwinski G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20042F660 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-WM-48 NUDOCS 9005090219 | |
| Download: ML20042F663 (2) | |
Text
j;
- -y
, a.
c y-
. a w.%:-
ww-
~#
G-*
~ APR 2 3 1990 -
4 -
, f os
~
UNITED STATES A nt so g
g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
U j
[ REGION IV URANIUM RECOVERY FIELD OFFICE box 25325
.. DENVER, COLORADO 80225 ;
b F
"APR I 31990 URF0:GRK Docket-No. WM x
- MEMORANDUM FOR::
Docket File'No. WM-4P
=!
FROM:
Gary R. Konwinski 1
{e Project-Manager.
SUBJECT:
MINUTES OF MEET::NG ON DURANGO GROUNO-WATER ISSUES ii s.
Participants:
Steve ~Hamp Hike-Kearny Jack-Caldwell:
'Ned.Larson Elizabeth Damler LGary Konwinski A. meeting was held at the DOE office in_ Albuquerque, New Mexico, on April 3, 1990. The purpose of the meeting was'to involve _Russ Edge in the ground-water compliance issues discussed in previous me_etings. Mr. Edge was - however, unable to attend. A meeting will be rescheduled toiinvolve'Mr. Edge in the.
ij various issues, as well as solicit his thoughts on ground-water compliance.
There were, however, several. issues' which were discussed that have: impacts 'on~
the design of the Bodo Canyon disposal cell.- DOE was made aware'of the Claymax
- l Lissues with which the NRC has concern.' Both of these issues, manufacturing QA/QC and installation QA/QC, have been researched by DOE.. They feel confident -
that they have collected sufficient information that these items of concern j
-will not longer be issues.
i A new issue surfaced during the meeting which concerned a point of< compliance-well' established in the paleo channel undcrlying the alluvium.
Apparently, an energy dissipation structure at the end of a diversion channel will pond water upgradient of -a point-of compliance well.
This could potentially cause water-level changes or modifications in water quality which could cause one to conclude that the cell is not performing as designed.
Due to this',' it was a
g.
"9005090219 900423 PDR WASTE PDC
.WM-48 D
x 1
j
x.
-- \\ '
q J..
i APR 2 3 (9901
- 2.'
APR 131990.
recommended that the TAC review their design to determine if alternate well siting or a modification to the energy dissipation structure would allow both' remedial action components.to fulfill their~ purposes.
-l l
Gary. Konwinski L
_,yl Project Manager.
.f L
. hc
'l
[
Approved by:
framon E. Hall,
a Ofrector
]
I 2
4 3
~1 g
j : h i
\\
\\:
1 1
'ki.
L 1
\\
s 3.g:
b t-s
.i4 l
t
.l
.i.
, 3;y 1
- k...
k' '
.\\ 8
)
z
,\\
g l '; -
k; t
. '\\ '
j -
i r.:
s
~iJ x:
-