ML20042F585

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Revised Final Regulatory Guide on Financial Assurance for Nuclear Reactor Decommissioning.Implementation Section of Guide Revised in Accordance W/Std Language for Implementing Backfit Rule.Review of Package Requested
ML20042F585
Person / Time
Issue date: 05/03/1990
From: Jordan E
Committee To Review Generic Requirements
To: Arlotto G, Johari Moore, Sheron B
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS), NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES), NRC OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL (OGC)
References
NUDOCS 9005090106
Download: ML20042F585 (2)


Text

'

n;-

yay 0 81990 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Guy A. Arlotto, HMSS Brian W. Sheron, RES Janice Moore, OGC Frank J. Miraglia, NRR Luis A. Reyes, RII FROM:

Edward L. Jordan, Chairman Committee to Review Generic Requirements

SUBJECT:

FINAL REGULATORY GUIDE ON FINANCIAL ASSURANCE FOR NUCLEAR REACTOR DECOMMISSIONING transmitted a revised final package providing guidance to -

licensees and.the NRC staff in addressing the requirements in the decommissioning rule amendments with regard to financial aspects.

The package has been revised in response to public comments, and the final guide has been reviewed and concurred in by NRR and NMSS, with OGC indicating it has no legal objection. The recommendations in the proposed guide do not extend current regulatory requirements, but only provide guidance for satisfying the requirements of the decommissioning rule.

RES believes that the impact on industry and the NRC staff are minimized to the extent practical and that NRC resource reductions should result from this action.

RES also suggested that, in view of the above factors.and other considerations outlined in Enclosure 1, the_CRGR might not-feel the need for a formal staff presentation.

The CRGR staff has reviewed the final guide and believe it is generally responsive to the Committee's two relatively minor comments provided to the EDO last year (Enclosure 2). The CRGR staff has prepared a memorandum to RES (Enclosure 3), which requests additional changes to the guide to reflect CRGR's comments fully.

In addition, the implementation section of the guide has been revised in accordance with the standard language for implementing the backfit rule, as requested by the CRGR, but an additional change is needed to clarify a sentence in this section.

Please review the revised package and let me know within 5 working days if you believe further consideration at a CRGR meeting is needed.

If I do not receive any such requests, I will send the draft memorandum provided in Enclosure 3.

Original S!gned by:

E. L Jordan Edward L. Jordan, Chairman Committee to Review Generic Requirements l

Enclosures:

See next page Distribution: See next page h

1 OFC :

g: AE00:DDy00

C R p

NAME :JShe :sim

. nran
DRMs o an

$f/tu)0 DATE $.f/ //90

$ + // /90

$/

90 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY nc, _

9005090106 900503 800 {'T/ [

h A PDR REV9P NRCCRGR g

CORRESPONDENCE PNV

_3 amfg%f fL g

1?t l?l.:

'I

.4.

> i P

Enclosures:

1..

Memorandum for E. L. Jordan from E. 5. Beckjord, dated 2/23/90 (Distributed April 2 to CRGR Las Item #22);

2.

Minutes of CRGR Meeting No. 160, dated April 5,1989

3.. Draft memo for E. S. Beckjord

.from E. L. Jordan I

Distribution:

1 ggCentral:Sile;m;3 PDR(DC$)

AE00 R/F CRGR S/F CRGR C/F.

EJordan Dross DA111 son JConran JShea RBosnak LShao FCardile

~C.

Feldman R. Wood 2

t i

3