ML20042F517

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Approved Notation Vote on SECY-90-100 Re DOE 10CFR810 Concerning Sensitive Nuclear Technology Determinations
ML20042F517
Person / Time
Issue date: 04/02/1990
From: Roberts
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 9005090017
Download: ML20042F517 (2)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:,, j,as+ ['" N'O:T A T I O N-V g g................. w ~ )u -LEASED TO TH o 4 .~ ,4 g g,,n); RESPONSESHEETj ...............g,- ij c,, .T0: SAMUEL J.-CHILK, SECRETARY 0F THE' COMMISSION: -{ h FROM: C0W4ISSIONER ROBERTS I ~

SUBJECT:

LSECY-90-100.- DOE 10:CFR PART 810 SENSITIVE

NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY' DETERMINATIONS J

AW i APPROVED-x DISAPPROVED ABSTAIN i Nor PARTICIPATING REQUEST DISCUSSION q COMMENTS: See attached modified letter, a i s: 9 m,., 3-~ a-l l / /l< '96oso9gg o 96babr /

m

$0$RESPD ll EN E PDR SIGN TU d y f0 K: RELEASE VOTE / / / i l, DATE l WITHHOLD' VOTE / / p b ENTERED ON "AS" YES,_ No Q v s

.,ll ( E i < s, " C. ,14- -w - 0 T. A F T v 4 Secretary Watkins t U.S. Department of Energy

Dear Admiral Watkins:

The Commission has recently reviewed with your staff the issue of export control requirements on sensitive nuclear technology,(SNT) as defined in Section. 4(a) of ~ the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Act of 1978 (NNPA). Under the-law, the Department of Energy (DOE) is required to-consult with HRC~and other agencies before authorizing SNT-and other, less sensitive, nuclear technology exports. L Our conclusions differ on the oasis for defining SNT, as' summarized in the. enclosed memorandum from our General Counsel, However, the-Commission q recogp1zes that DOE has full and fiaal authority under the law both to define ~ 1 3.'1. SNT and regulate its export,. L Cw.. ks40n-does-not4ntend-tc cias enratten-fur-ther-in curTtiture caTe tiyxcaTe tolmrtt'ztions orrmueten, munuiegy axpart vagunsla. We will continue to provide DOE with our views on whether } such exports are inimical to the national interest. As you know, we have agreed in the past with DOE's overall statutory findings. <t i Because of its significance, I am bringing this matter to your parsonal attention in case you wish to review past practices in this area. Sincerely, /Qf ' ' - h =n Carr l

Enclosure:

As stated l' If ,}}