ML20042D146

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Be Risksmart Rev 1 - Modified Diagnostic Tools - 2.6.20 (003) (002)
ML20042D146
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/11/2020
From: Alexander Schwab
NRC/NRR/DRA/APOB
To:
Alexander Schwab
References
Download: ML20042D146 (25)


Text

An OEDO Futures Transformation Initiative THE AGENCYS VISION THE FOCUS AREAS MAP TO SEVEN ONGOING INITIATIVES FOCUS INITIATIVES AREAS Our People Accepting Risk Career Accepting Risk Technology Adoption Enhancement Agency Desired Technology Culture Signposts and Innovation Markers Innovation Process 2 Simplification

An OEDO Futures Transformation Initiative Why another risk-informed What is success?

decisionmaking effort?

  • Confidence to use risk-Provide a common high-level informed decisionmaking framework, applicable to all
  • Understand that the NRC disciplines (e.g., technical, mission is maintained legal, corporate)
  • Realize benefits by appropriately focusing resources to the most important endeavors

Siloed organization Limited awareness of guidance Potential flexibilities not reflected in guidance

  • Treatment of low likelihood events
  • Reluctance to adapt processes RIDM Happens
  • Limited consideration of benefits Organically at Be riskSMART the NRC
  • Applied too late in process
  • Presence of uncertainties Lack of guidance
  • Rigid interpretation of regulations Inconsistent management support and expectations Summarized from: Implementing Commission Direction on Applying Risk-Informed Principles in Regulatory Decision Making, ML19319C832 This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA- This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND NC

Gauging Success:

Risk Informed Decisionmaking Starts with YOU!

Individual contributors H

ideal M

own Be riskSMART L

typical L M H Management owns Be riskSMART Lets be a part of the change together!

  • what can go wrong/right?
  • what are the consequences?

Spot

  • how likely is it?

Manag

  • what you can e

Act

  • on a decision Realize
  • the result Teach
  • others what you learned

the problem statement Spo t Articulate the Problem Statement Should I commute to work using a bike to get more exercise?

Consider:

  • Do I need to ask the question
  • Is there a pre-determined answer (e.g., employer commuting policy, law)

what can go wrong/right?

Spo t What event(s) or circumstance(s) present a challenge or opportunity?

Need exercise to stay Get exercise while healthy commuting Fall Save Gas

what are the consequences?

Spo t What are the possible outcomes of the challenges or opportunities?

Health Declines Health Improves INJURY Increased Income Better for Environment

how likely is it?

Spo Using the best available information (could be quantitative t and/or qualitative), what is the chance of event(s) or circumstance(s) leading to a particular consequence Health Improves: % Depends on Health Declines: ~100% technique, equipment and commute conditions Injury: % Depends on severity, traffic, terrain, proficiency Increased Income: ~100%

Better for Environment: ~100%

Document Spotting Results Using a Heat Map H

Consequence M

L L M H Likelihood

what you can Manag e How can I mitigate, prevent, prepare for, and transfer challenges and/or enhance the opportunities?

No Exercise Health Declines:

Exercise Health Improves: work on engage in other types of exercise technique to get more benefits instead Fall Injury: buy protective gear, get better bike, dont ride in bad weather, carry first aid kit, ride on better roads Save Gas Increase Income & Better for Environment: nothing to manage

Adjust Results Based on Management Strategies H

Consequence M

L L M H Likelihood

Collate Heat Map Inputs on the decision Act After hearing everyone and evaluating the information, document what you spotted and managed, and make a decision.

Consequence Likelihood

on the decision Act After hearing everyone and evaluating the information, document what you spotted and managed, and make a decision.

High risk appetite Consequence Go Biking!

Nah not worth itcontinue to go to the gym Likelihood

on the decision Act After hearing everyone and evaluating the information, document what you spotted and managed, and make a decision.

Low risk appetite Consequence Go Biking!

Nah not worth itcontinue to go to the gym Likelihood

the result Realiz e Now its time to implement and ascertain efficacy!

Do what you decided under Act while managing what you can and measuring your performance and progress

others what you learned Teac Take the time to manage knowledge by synthesizing lessons-h learned and insights, and disseminating to a broader audience spread the word!

  • Bring a colleague next time
  • Share information on best gear, routes, sites with biking group/blog
  • Apply lessons-learned to a new activity

Continual Make adjustments as Learning things change (weather) and you learn new Organization things (traffic pattern)

Obstacles Identified by the Staff

  • Reluctance to adapt processes (T) Potential flexibilities not Inconsistent management reflected in guidance (S) support and expectations (A)
  • Treatment of low likelihood events (S)
  • Applied too late in process (S)

Limited awareness Siloed organization (SMART) *Rigid interpretation of guidance (T) of regulations (S)

  • Presence of uncertainties *Limited consideration of (M and S) benefits(S)

Lack of guidance (T)

Lets be a part of the change together!

Summarized from: Implementing Commission Direction on Applying Risk-Informed Principles in Regulatory Decision Making, ML19319C832

Be on the lookout for these next steps Milestone Date Develop Diagnostic Tool February 2020 Conduct Pilot Tests April 2020 Finalize Framework May 2020 Deliver Functional Area Training September 2020 Perform Knowledge Check December 2020 Collect Staff Examples March 2021 Conduct a Jam March 2021 Perform a Survey April 2021

Questions?

Reach out to anyone on the

PM: Jason Paige, NRR Roger Hannah, OPA RII Reed Anzalone, NRR Brian Harris, OGC Elizabeth Bowlin, OCFO Brian Harris, RES June Cai, NMSS Jason Piotter, NMSS Candace de Messieres, NRR Rebecca Richardson, NSIR Mike Gartman, OCHCO Mirabelle Shoemaker, NMSS Team Leader: Co-Team Lead:

Mirela Gavrilas, NRR Eric Duncan, RIII Executive Co-Sponsors:

Ben Ficks, OCFO John Lubinski, NMSS Darrell Roberts, RIII