ML20042C552

Clarifies 820315 Discovery Status Rept.Application Will Be Amended within 3 Wks.Applicant Will Then Request ASLB Set Beginning Date to File Summary Disposition Motions

ML20042C552
Person / Time
Site:	05000142
Issue date:	03/23/1982
From:	Cormier W CALIFORNIA, UNIV. OF, LOS ANGELES, CA
To:	Frye J, Luebke E, Paris O Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
NUDOCS 8203310512
Download: ML20042C552 (2)

Text

-- s

=' .. .

UNIVEllSITY OF CALI ' pt EU, i \NC ELF.S r rF' . UCLA

\h _ , . lhh

,,m,,,,.im,,...u m. g;.c...u m3..w3 . M ,o, m .,w,m. id E) mnmm, mmm N -

p)4 82 p 29 Tj)eS 59 c.

g"r hn p. sz -

cc.% '

crncE or nic curscer.um

- %$$ff"[ ff g, w-i,9 n -

Los Ascues, cruronsir wei g

p March 23, 1982

~

John II. Frye, III, Chau n Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atomic Safety and Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Board Washington, D.C. 20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Dr. Oscar !!. Paris Washington, D.C. 20555 Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing loard U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Wasilington, D.C. 20555 In the Matter of The Regents of the University of California (UCLA Research Reactor)

Docket No. 50-142 (Proposed Renewal of Facility License)

Dear Administrative Judges:

3 In our recently submitted status report on discovery (dated March 15, 1982) we requested that the Board set a beginning date for the filing of summary disposition motions. Mr. Hirsch called to inform me that he intended to make his own request regarding scheduling matters but could not do so until he had an opportunity to examine the amendments we will be making to the 5

• 2 application. }!r. Hirsch was concerned that our requ. cst to the J Board appears to urge the setting of a summary disposition date prior fo the time we would be submitting our amendments ,to the application. .

Our request to the Board was not intended to deny Mr. Ilirsch a fair opportunity to inform the Board of his own scheduling preferences. At Mr. Ilirsch 's request, I agreed to clarify the scheduling request contained in our status report.

Applicant expects that it will be amending its cpplicantion within the next two (2) or three (3) weeks. After examining the extent of any "new information" that may be contained in the amendments, the parties will be able to make cpecific' requests relating to scheduling matters. Applicant is not urging the Board to-set any schedule before the parties have received Applicant's amendments and have had an opportunity 8203310512 820323

{DRADOCK05000 fg

ei 4o ,

Administrative Judge Frye Page March 23, 1982 to make srjecific scheduling requests to the Board. At that time, cs Applicant has informed the Board in its status report, Applicant will re squest that the Board set a beginning date for the filing of summsry disposition motions.

Sincerely,

~

f) = = 1 .-

William II. Cormier UCLA Representative Tile REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA cc: Service List i

e

{}

4 g P

G 3-9 i

i, -

i 9

1

.+

S

,