ML20042A211
| ML20042A211 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden, Byron, Braidwood, Quad Cities, Zion, LaSalle, 05000000, 05000049 |
| Issue date: | 03/17/1982 |
| From: | Schroeder C COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Bevan R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| 3654N, NUDOCS 8203230206 | |
| Download: ML20042A211 (2) | |
Text
.
/
Commonwealth Edison
[
1
) ons First Nationit Pina. ChiCgo. Ilknois
(
C'
~7 Addr ss Raply to: Post Offica Box 767 QU Chicago, Illinois 60690 March 17, 1982 b
REcyp,q,.p MAR 4
b Mr. Roby Bevan Quality Control Project Manager 1)
Of fice o f Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
/f Washington, DC 20555 iG
Subject:
Commonwealth Edison Company Interpretation o f Technical Specifications Section 6.0.H.1 and 2 NRC Docket Nos. 50-10/237/249 50-254/265 50-295/304 50-373/374 50-454/455/456/457
Dear Mr. Bevan:
The purpose o f this letter is to confirm our telephone conversation regrarding the requirements for independent fire protection and loss prevention program and inspection and audits.
The Technical Specification states:
"H.l.
An independent fire protection and loss prevention program inspection and audit shall be performed at least once per 12 months utilizing either qualified of f-site licensee personnel or an outside fire protection firm.
H.2.
An inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss prevention program shall be performed by a qualified outside fire consultant at least once per 36 months."
Based on our discussions on March 16 and 17, 1982, it is our understanding that, if Item H.1 were accomplished annually by an outside fire protection firm, Item H.2 would be automatically accomplished.
The intent is that an annual inspection and audit must be performeo. At least once each 36 months, the annual inspec-tion must be done by an outside fire protection firm instead of qualified of fsite personnel.
All annual inspections may be. done by an outside fire fjd.Ml F * ** " V"*t GAA. tsiamlcack Yp w/en/ds6 DO K 050 of)fo D
3
.o
/~
R. Bevan March 17, 1982 protection firm and this would meet the requirements o f H.1 and H.2.
There is no intent to require dif ferent outside fire protection firms to conduct H.1 and H.2.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Very truly yours, 3[/7/SL C.
W. Schroeder Nuclear Licensing Administrator 1m cc:
NRC Resident Inspector 3654N l
l l
i l
l l
l i