ML20041F263
| ML20041F263 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/18/1982 |
| From: | Oller R, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041F249 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900113 NUDOCS 8203160343 | |
| Download: ML20041F263 (16) | |
Text
.
ORGANIZATION:
BARTON INSTRUMENTS CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900113/82-01 INSPECDON DATE{S):
1/4-8/82 INSPECDON ONSITE HOURS: 27 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:
Barton Instruments A Unit of International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation ATTN:
Mr. T. J. Shideler General Manager 900 South Turnbull Canyon Rd.
City of Indu,stry, CA 91749 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. G. R. Welt, Director of Quality Assurance TELEPHONE:
(213) 961-2546 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:
Process Control Instrumentation NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: The current nuclear Class 1E equipment percentage output for the Barton Instrument Company is 9.6%.
The plant has 108 active orders for 34 different customers.
ASSIGNED INSPECTOR-R.
'E. Oller, Components Section Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
I Mb
$M 2-II-T2 APPROVED BY:
U. Potapovs, Chief, Acting Chief, CS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and 10 CFR Part 21.
B.
SCOPE:
Status of previous inspection findings; manufacturing process control; change control; nonconformances and corrective action; and 10 CFR Part 21 implementation.
~ ~ e, IATED ORIGINAL gt 8203160343 820223 PDR GA999 EMVITT 99900113 PDR
BARTON INSTRUMENTS ORmmON:
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900113/82-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 5 A.
VIOLATION:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
None C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None D.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1.
(Closed) Deviation A (79-01):
Failure by Document Control to assure that before accepting engineering Document Release Notices, that the appropriate approval signatures were in the allocated spaces, as required by paragraph 5.2 of Standard Practice No. EN-1, dated April 26, 1978.
The inspector verified t. hat in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letters dated, May 11 and June 13, 1979, the Standard Practice No. EN-1 was revised and a new related engineering instruction No. EI-002 was issued on August 3,1979, to provide specific instructions for proper completion of Document Release Notices.
This instruction also provided for the Checker to verify that all entries on DRNs are complete.
Review of three current DRNs verified that these documents are being properly signed off.
2.
(Closed) Deviation A.2 (79-01):
Failure by the Change Board to provide approval release signatures on Engineering Order No.
8320, as required by paragraphs 4.2.1 and 4.2.1.5 of Standard Practice No. EN-2-1, dated June 30, 1977.
The inspe.: tor verified that in accordance with the vendor's corrective action response letters dated, May 11 and June 13, 1979, the Standard Practice No. EN-2-1 was revised and reidentified as EN-2 and a new related engineering instruction No. EI-003 was issued on September 9, 1979, to p' ovide specific instructions for r
proper completion and signoffs of Engineering Orders.
This instruction also provided for the Checker to verify that all entries on the EOs are complete.
Review of three current E0s verified that these documents are being properly signed off.
l
ORGANIZATION-~
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.:
99900113/82-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 5 3.
(Closed) Deviation B (79-01):
Failure to meet the response letter commitment date of April 21, 1978, for changing the audit procedure QAI No. 18-01 to include audit of Inspection Indoctrination, as committed to in Barton Instrument's corrective action response letter dated April 21, 1978.
The inspector' verified that in accordance with the vendor's response letter dated, May 11, 1979, the reason for the delay in issuing the audit instruction QAI No. 18-01, was that a complete rewrite of all standard practices, instructions, and the QA Manual occurred in 1978.
As a result, QAI No. 18-01 was issued on September 29, 1978, after the issue of the new QA Manual Sections QU-18 " Internal Audits" and QU-19 " Training and Qualification of Personnel" on April 7, 1978 and April 4, 1978, respectively.
This condition has been reviewed at Barton and the QA Program Manager is now aware of the need to notify the NRC concerning changes in commitments.
4.
(Closed) Deviation C (79-01):
Failure to correct the referenced documents (Manufacturing Instruction and Production Orders) for P/Ns 0764-10034 and 0764-10608, by placing dates at location of inspection stamps, as commited to in Barton's corrective action response letter, dated April 21, 1978.
The inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's response letter dated, May 11, 1979, the referenced documents have been corrected by placing dates at the location of the inspection stamps.
The inspection personnel were given formal training concerning proper completion of Manufacturing Instructions and Production Order (travelers) in August and September 1978.
Review of three recently completed mis verified that the inspectors are placing dates after the inspection stamps as required.
5.
(Closed) Deviation D (79-01):
Failure to meet the April 21, 1978, date for performing the Supplier Control and Test Control audits as committed to in Barton's corrective action response letter dated April 21, 1978.
The inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's response letter dated, May 11, 1979, that although Supplier u ntrol was not audited until May 31, 1978, and Test Control was not audited until June 24, 1978, this condition has not continued.
Review of internal audit reccrds verified that the subject areas have since been audited to a specified schedule.
Yearly schedules for the entire QA program have been established and implemented.
l
BARTON INSTRUMENTS ORGANIZATION: CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA REPORT NO.: 99900113/82-01 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 4 of 5 6.
(Closed) Deviation E (79-01):
Failure to meet the June 1, 1978, date for establishing the procedure No. QU-7, relating to selection of suppliers, as committed to in Barton's corrective action response letter dated April 21, 1978.
The inspector verified that in accordance with the vendor's response letter dated May 11, 1979, the reason for the late issue of the QA Manual procedure QU-7, on July 10, 1978, was that this procedure was not completed through the signature approval cycle prior to June 1, 1978.
This condition has been reviewed at Barton and the QA Program Manager is now aware of the need to notify the NRC concerning changes in commitments.
E.
OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:
1.
Manufacturing Process Control - The inspector reviewed seven sections of the vendor's QA Manual No. 81-11-162, Revision No. 1, which were applicable to material receiving, parts manufacture, assembly, inspection, qualification testing and test control of IE safety-related differential pressure transmitters.
Observations were made of:
identification of raw materials; inprocess parts in the machine shop; parts and subassemblies inspection; transmitter assembly; hydrostatic tests; calibration tests and final inspection of completed transmitters.
To verify that parts manufacture and inspection, and transmitter assembly, hydrostatic tests, calibration tests and final inspections are controlled and documented in accordance with requirements, review was made of:
two customer purchase orders; shop copies of four Manufacturing Instructions (travelers) for in process parts; five Registrars (travelers) for transmitters in various stages of assembly; ten mis (travelers) for completed parts, and six assembly procedures.
Within this area, no nonconformances to NRC, customer order, or QA program requirements were identified, and no unresolved items were identified.
2.
Change Control - The inspector reviewed two sections of the vendor's QA Manual which were applicable to changes to design and manufacturing documents.
To verify that changes in design and manufacturing documents for differential pressure transmitters were controlled and documented, a
(
review was made of:
four engineering and manufacturing standards; six records of Document Change Requests, Document Request Notices I
l l
i f
BARTON INSTRUMENTS 0"U#"U".'
CITY OF INDUSTRY, CALIFORNIA R N NO.:
INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 99900113/82-01 5M5 and Engineering Orders, a Change Control Board Log; tan record packages, each consisting of one or more records such as Standard Distribution Sheets, E0s, DCRs, DRNs, Drawings, and Revised Data Computer Inputs.
Within this area, no nonconformances to NRC, customer order, or QA Program requirements were identified, and no unresolved items were identified.
3.
Nonconformances and Corrective Action - The inspector reviewed two sections of the vendor's QA Manual which were applicable to the control and disposition of nonconformances in materials, parts, subassemblies and components received from subvendors and/or identified during parts tanufacture, and transmitter assembly identified or found during performance of other QA program activities.
To verify that nonconforming items were reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired, or reworked, and that conditions adverse to quality, including the cause, are promptly identified and corrected, a review was made of:
three QA Instructions; an Internal Cause and Corrective Log; seven Corrective Action Requests and the related Reject Reports; a Request for Corrective Action Log for vendors; five Request for Corrective Action (vendor's) and the related correspondence; and a letter log for delinquent vendors.
Observations were made of a caged segregation area for nonconforming items.
Within this area, no nonconformances to NRC, customer order, and/or QA program requirements were identified, and no unresolved items were identified.
4.
10 CFR Part 21 - The inspector reviewed the vendor's Standard Practice Notice No. GE-12, "NRC Regulations to 10 CFR Part 21" l
(Effective January 5,1978), to verify that adequate documented i
measures were available to meet the reporting requirements of 10 CFR Part 21.
I Observations of the employee's bulletin board verified that the i
above vendor notice and Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, were posted.
Within this area no violations were identified.
I nspec t'or' f f (7//p' y Docket No. 7) M -//3 Report No. #d -O /
~
Page / of
/#
Scope / Module S/c/uf / /E v e 6"#-
DOCUMENTS EXAMINED vinpp c//c;, f/>><//"FS
/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
7 177 gsi/c,, s cer,ecfives e /,c,,
,,s ai,ge k f/e,x c/a6/
Mn v // n n c/ D7m / ? /979
& ANY />,wif &v. 77-Gy si' A 2
7 7 Bar /c-n 's FA h$rowl2b. 9/-//-Arz 'He f /
?
2 6'4 Adric//h c // rr.=
E6 -/ denp, 47=-/ensc. ef Es,gi >r -
eei i ng /)se c me n fe, y',e,,
g.,. sc
,,,,,.1 m,einE,in r 2/>s/ro c-la EZ-CO2
Ac c c. />> mil,#-/p a 4'
-7 bl/ ce /Ye*/A1 ra f/ r/> 1os// u c/rc a y.7 '77 S
~3 s4o c/or/ /} a e /i re EA/-Z "c'A'<, n c e Gn frc. J "
s?-/ -72 C
3 En ei n,w i j n
,Zn s7'ro c // cn E7-c'ch. '%>n < 17 ePri nr c
I J
t Glc6=rs Neoc ? rer // cin -. -
9-9-79 7
f
/f% rei o4 s r'r er r en / _d Ab n nc/ YA c-re/c le*cJ/).
7-7-F/
5
,f derer/ ef Infe7 na / Ac///cf,~As.do cc>ntpo / t
~
04 / uc/// /9ece c/ctre QAf. AG. /&'-O1 t -/P-79
'l _ _
7 3
T
/G
-y
' Ahrt49 fnienf Accli!/iececlerc-Q?i4, Z, /fw, AV<?2 6'- c'- Us A
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchaso0rder 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Docmnent 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspictor' ff t'I//ar Docket No. ?WCC// 3 Report No. fz-cs Scop:/Hodule S id!u s c' f O e V ! C U S P*9'
- f
/d DOCUMENTS EXAMINED fi tc//4 3-Tngoe c fici i
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 4
'/
G)/f /*Ya'wa / Se c/ icy, Q u -/f
_7,, /,, n c; /,4u(/, f s s'-7-7f iv, 4.
v
/2
,y decce c/s e f fra in lo c fer sh sne efe~rr c/c; /d M-3/- 7J' M,ccm A 9s'-vsfiA Y S-/ !>g
?
/3 2
& ll'N, m e ur I0n / Mm. o yG, e f, i sir c Znsfrc/ c //c ns(frawlk
('c < h,$s Cec 74c??-cr269 7./cdGse3 2 pn/5f/3-ccqz v:r 7 ices
^
/"
~7 f'ro < p dc r a GMI -/4 - C'6' S ri mio (cnbc/
~
/C
,Q f/1.ls7 47 >> a / Aotf) f Tr-Yry clg -Gr -fje f2//cwnw arR?S.-
_5-V
~7 9 J
(s")
'77) A j (?^si ' (c' l 9
9' e >
4 f:) & ce o v. 'n c 1>> som e fic n T,'? ~?/9 i
^
m>
sWeF,c?n,
";'f,.~i W
(~ )
S e, > // s i l'c >> /r c /
$ &'lb,8 i
'f 9
1i> bi > a / Ao,-/; / _fcd,, clu/,. S far /9af/ ca eol/9f 7
/7 J/
c'A Mk i ua / Ser // c i, QL/- 7 '% /re/d i, 65 con // @ r s "
s-/c-76'
/3 9
A n>c m / '"Frin,/c7 h?ci 5 for };S 7 "
fc -2c'4 '
/9
/
ENamwd ' G7A ??cm44 /, JPp'ieches. Kepe r7 9er ve' sic &rs i' x'< -e <
^
j y
~
v Locument Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawi.ig 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) l
Docket No. F7cv// 7 Inspector # f. 8//r r Report No. y 2 - o /
Page S of
/t-Scope / Module M7e/J c /'ure n s DOCUMENTS EXAMINED ~
J
/%ce s s Cc n 7'rol l
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
4 4'A M9nus / Se'rbch S Cd-5 9 t1 - 8 Ot]- 57 c;7& t - s c' G2/-//, fu -////. s n el 4 u -/ </
nrr/cu 5 A,A.
2 5
A o os y a / /-/,o r /r i i-Cem^ts n a /brc/raSf Or'cff r Sc.
25'2 - A'// 9/9 Nr Sri FVc. re/s & cf A 2 !rnn5mY/r;r i
s
- / S w i ! r / p e I
7-2C ef')
A/, A.
?
S TAM S /, n e Acc, p f/pr!rir (c* r n. f G Av. 556-ALC-4C7/CC-ON Ni C/G S s
/f fra n S nu 7'/r= r s d '29-19 4
/
SAen (cs,bs e /~ M]. s /%a vs/c< s ) Gr int rorps.s 4 ros:s -
sul/hr Acar/s as &//ows fs) /?ec/F/ A e- /ff Afn cJ.
^
M /91 </
n,,
c': 2 4 - C/JEC (3) fhi / /se C224 -C22/2
^
C. ).nir f so, c'2r 4 - C'cG9 C S
A 9 0 ;efrar f frw/er ) c/or c ires /m c/ra rF G, sscan A 4,
<- h /A C sih 26h 7M2I2 h -/mh5n1 Wer V""'"5 C
s
~7/ w e Cra i s fra r l'na w /, ) </c e c m e si? rw c kc<, ss Urcuc; A
/
c c ro n /,c '/s c i, sf' fi An / //?3/_w e ;%n ',
ss' trou s Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specifica tion 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Bnspector pi'r (7//r r Docket No. 999cc//3 Report No. p> 8 cope / Module Nan der /vr/e#
Page d' of
/e" DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
/}c cc-s s (en rc'/
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 7
<Y frei g frar //nwe/ic } dc' cc 'see n lm c ling f /E~r / M - 2 JL?- M A' i
s
+
j
- 964. 4k-c= /
t<? vicu.s
/V. A.
E i
G ms./N/sc/ M 1. s (fra vdrs ) R, %= k //cm ns f rac s -
7n!7bi on r / hm h s r S :
(i) /?k -G224 - O W4'e, i:, C -f4 f '?/ f v4 s
(2' ) Riy - c2 2 a -G22 / W, t v:G - G44'3 3 /
^
(Sr) BN. -c:2 2 K i:>G c"<f /2 7
- 9) 2 x -d fc6 - s.2 6 3 e, n,c: -c% vGC (5)f:k. 1 9uc -rc 4 5s w o - GS4' 6 7 2-u (c)13 M, - 90 ~P - #9 99 9,
tv. O-c W /2 3 r
N)P#
& f(f 02/Sh' iMO -p+'525 2 (e f /? 4'.
- 0 7 /5 - /cc 7.D r< cz -cr +w 790 (9) C N. - 02 5 - /dc' ?b iva dV4Pf/
(e) PA. - 0226 - 900 7D tw -69.3 646
~
9
-3 f~s #cw m a f/pr I, n te r;S5,c=in//u ore rpclurr 5 :
- 9) hh/p/l76 3/764< ',,, Ther m a / fhlc /s 'Av. C?/-//35 -2
'/
- _ l2' ).% </e/ '74"N W.es>c Tra n sm < 7?er As se n, bly
'.'b. 07C4-//+'!-2_
R r
D i/isp on'/c.n Gwi/dssp4/y % cyr</-pyy. z x
(3) i%g'e/ 7Cy
' ',.. Rr Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Inspector *
- f C//fr Docket No. 997ccit3 Report No. #2-c/
Scop @/ Module Na w/e c drin e DOCUMENTS EXAMINED J
Recpss Ce s, 7re /
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/#-
3 rc Jm4 t%) Na/e / 76 4 ",,. 7:
7d o, m <a n ir, p a fi,,,/,s,c e f*)) p y,z; f h 7
-l
,c e. C 7G 4 -/H/G - p_
a (c)
- 4% </ es!n G r b5 / w
< f & /) t%,iis %e W76 3(C7.2
/
/
(s)
Ad/p/ 7te
".:, Foa k/4,,, deHcn,s th i / A> s pn, A lu ani
//v//spYrig Ving l
&) nb& / 76 3 J 664
Co4Am /s h Zn c L cl/ ces fcr F4rfrcnie /3e scc sc-Mw sn lffer "w. c7Cv -// 7/. 2 3
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other(Specify-ifnecessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
Docket No. f9R e e/F Unspector' M? [ 8//F r Report No. # 2 -cv Scope / Module (fr/77 m (rede/
Page ( of r DOCUMENTS EXAMINED y
1 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
N 6M h?r?rwal 5e~ c br#S !
(s) Gd - G
R s c'e / c~coYte/ef NFSicn /)ccc megls
2-/ 7-7S A '- A 2-
?
Fe//as/ac Skm/p/ (Prac // rF5 :
GJ Ek 2 YArj n cye Ce n f tv l '
57-/- 7Y c2) Ek - 4 M/{/EC Pre crx/'c/re "
224-77
^
(3) P1F -/At '* Wins,erarn fu/is-/d'/sejr /%,/}er/zcz//ch/'73/1 )
A p ore v a /
/c 7f'
^
,s 6A #1/= - 4 "h?c/I? c-fa efuri n 9 l/75lrucllcn 2-/5-79 2
cf Fe //ctus h c yFccycl< # f.)crumbn l (Ann 99fikn ur> S fs A ccrur>n1 bru,s?' M hr,r ono/Entm nr in! cnc/e r s j
4)' M w - // 3 5 5 i+ &
^
(h)
/3 (/? - // 9 7 /
J2-226/
h) b c' A' - // 73 0
/2-224' (u) p (; - // F T 2 222-8/
(5) /)cA' - // 717
/2-27,P'
^
^
2)
M A'
- //33d' m 2 9-8 '
n' C'4 nw Cenf ro/
Ocorci Le 9
]
J Document Types:
C01umns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
$nspectof
-#,l' C //p r Docket No. 7-veci/3 Report No. p -c-Scope / Module CAance (en frc/
Pu90 Of
/f DOCUMENTS EXAMINED j
j i
I l
2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4 n 7re >> / c:mo/,6c ',e,c,/,rxyche a f g L'
fc L m c.
i
&n 5i s A)n.~ of' cme > cr mcw c f Mc/. 4', i fr a 1et/tec, SArr fg J
c E O-,
)A C/P x
- d. JP 4'.
s Ara u i n a s e,,c/sfkr, Skl
/ft1&.!no. //<
I x if c' A f) no
/C SSR 1
)
i MfC2
\\
\\
(z 1
~
r (3 )
//979 (4)
//60'?
(5)
//C /"
t j
/Gc~iG 1
M\\
1 (7 )
Egg)
~
(f)
/6df3
/sc i' e I
/P/
M
/a s s l
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable) 3
Vnspector' d.' I 6 //e r Docket No. mTera r Report No. f2 -c/
~~
Page S of /r Scope / Module &n ce n fer m cn cr DOCUMENTS EXAMINED
~~
=
p /C'crre c 1' ice Ae //c,,
I 2
TITLE / SUBJECT 3
4
/
' ?'
fA /9&na/ $<> rbcs 7s pu- /5 o si,/ qu -/C y $.-/c
~
y
,v, A 2
- f Fe //cw ha GA lb s /r u c f, c n c.
/,1 6'A ? ka,-g-G/ Sez,y /m ccircarbr A6
/ -/E-77 A
/v (in G A Z A b. If-c'? rcrier 4/e A r/ic n
/f%cc:ps f '
,C-/- 7 2 c
l'M 4A ] ivo.
/S -C 4 $p 'e> e !< c's,
/fo' r r i 1 })/ qi e s l y's c +,
t/-2+ 72 A
,s.
3 9
]>&,7, a / ('a u c e f(str dN Dr A-6c :, '/cq 7G r'/2-3 '-SG 1h n, /-6 -3 2 id4.
W
.So ce> </s c-( //e & Uca ine; 9M rerrhclide Afci, fr=qqq/pf s nc/ 1t'/<7i,#el' So l'<-><- l $r>pcifs (i)
(4 e 9 /-cT-55 ER ' se. /29" 8 s.n -- S' A'N (2)
(4n i,,3 i-e ?- ? i
&A' &
/., p c <1 v-s F S i (3) c'Af' 4:. ei-e ? - ?:
LP As-
/.3267 7-/C-S '
[A t'Af' fi.f/4W ~??
jf/(' M.
/3 2!./C
?-/f-8/
[5] <- A R 4e G /- m 7 '//
A'A' re
/.36'2 4' 9 'r - d' '
(k ) c'A,e Me 2 /- n-a.:
.f.W L'c
// -/c <?/
(7) (AA> tc 3 /- //- L'd Ay %
19577
//-2/- S /
~ [9)
S f
& qves/ )?>
(c & secl< w Ac Y'<<;i 1< 9 fc 7
/ E ' 4 ' c o9,
t
~
' /.2 - 3c - / '
Document Types:
Columns:
1.
Drawing 5.
Purchas Order 1.
Sequential Item Number 2.
Specification 6.
Internal Memo 2.
Type of Document 3.
Procedure 7.
Letter 3.
Date of Document 4.
QA Manual 8.
Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.
Revision (If applicable)
3
/
/
)e e/ 'c r
l e
b r
b a
F 2 m
c P c V
/
u i
9 N
l 4
ttp mnnp oof 4
eeea NNo k
t mnuuf I
tt ccI er7 l oo(
k o5
/
ADD f f' cp
/
E' [-
i n
oee 4
tffo DR g nooi H
2- ~
a P
3
?
7 z
/
e s
- ueei
?.
/
sqpt v 3
/
neyae 2
/
l i
/
mSTDR
/
t i
u I
lo....
s C1234 r
w A=c m
i/
rv r
Y e
n rr f
G o
ir '
n
=r
/
i
/
c r
F n
b(
th
/s c r
D E
s n
G N
T 1
I C
e r
M E
u
/
c A
J e )
X B
q s '
- e'f Z
E U
S S
/
T E
r E
T qN 5
N L
y
)y M
I U
T
'n c
r a
a i
s w l 1,
s 0D e
e N
s c
/ l s
en N /r
'n i
f e
S i
s Y
s y
e ro f
A' y
6 l
em i
(&
/
3 f de c
f _'O y-7 rM e
6 f O
p c {T 3
3 3 3
~/
G l
S sa
(
G D
C c 0
c anr hrer e
s c
l k cete
/
rtth 0
s c
s
/
v li c
4 v
N e unet c
r b
i PILO e
n A r l/
c
)
)
)
)
(2 (3 (4 [)6 k e
b r
s
(
i 5678 f d k
t i
s re r
fi
/<
fe r
no
/
n e
i e
r s
t 6
c r
e ael p
cra r G 9
y gi u u f
2 l
T nf d n a
/w iiea
?
t wccM d
naeo e
erprA
/
mDSPQ lu u
'r d
c o
o o
't M
l 7
D1234 c
/
1 e
a p
p 4
s o
'n c
S I
y t/
/
)e c
r l
c 0 e
b 7
b a
s W'J 2 e m
c u
i N
l ttp f
mnnp oof 4
eeea NN o t mm I uuf tter#
ccI k o/
l oo(
ADD cp i
n oee f
tffo DR g a
7 nooi e
s p
ueei g
sqpt v 3
e neyae mSTDR u
lo C1234
~
/
2
/f b/
~
T/
T
(
C/
e 27 c
/r D
s E
r N
T e
/
I C
c M
E n 6 A
J X
B 3
E U
f
/a S
/
S
/
N L
c u
T E
E T
t o
)
/
y M
I r
e r
A P a
U T
C c
O
/
s D
n se c Y ce
/
n f
A 4'
f 1
s y
n ro f
e em i
de c
l G
rM e
r O
p l
S s
sa
(
6 E
anr hrer G
cet e
~
c rtth
/
7 unet PILO 2
'7 o
/
I s r
5678 79/
t
/p
?e no
/0 f(
~
i s
t e
ael 3
p cra C
/
2 y gi u u T nf d n
/
ii ea F.
t wccM naeo e
I erprA l
mDSPQ u
u r
d c
o o
o...
t M
/
D1234 c
/
I e
e p
p s
o n
c l
6 l
- lll
PERSONS CCNTACTED b '<F//2 Ccmpany 7 0 l54' Y " f/>S/w'mch lK Cates Occket/ Report No. 9'7 9 #6' # 3 /d'2~6'/
Inspector M E @[// r O
?890 ' Of l
4 Affer,cir'cl // r-' Ex// Afeefm5 i
NAME(Please Print)
TITLE (Please Print)
ORGANIZATION (Please Print)
M', / hor ra >>
Ah o c le r c t'hir//re // rrg
.? 7 T D n r fes, x
/
~T /> w << <> t' ffc'ma 9e r. c'f PA Acy ras:a x
/
/
l'?.
Sf! et (/ bc'r //
//d/rdpoer cif$ip<nrr4s or v?f it'/Cc6, J
/
J
< it rovemAer Ain-c fe, vid,esparct s,
~
i
~
C, f'i t/~
a M.Z m c=e /c r 7^,
67','/e ei Aire c /c'>
Civ nt/:<ws n
/
T, G /r icl0/e r
&n era /
G'MPP r x
J
/1'. SPd clf
})/ rec-lcr aff>risneer'/n7
'~
n a
g, wp/+
D:iec (a c /Ghr/db sc/nnw
/
i t
I l
.