ML20041F130
| ML20041F130 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 03/09/1982 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041F115 | List: |
| References | |
| ENVR-820228-01, ENVR-820228-1, NUDOCS 8203160216 | |
| Download: ML20041F130 (28) | |
Text
-
4
=
ss-1 & 2 Ravision 1
.j ER-OLS February 1982 TABLE 451.02-1 COMPARISON OF ANNUAL WIND SPEED DISTRIBUTIONS V
(Values in 5 of Time)
Wind Speed 43' Wind Speed 209' Wind Speed Range Apr 79-Mar 80 Jun 80-May 81 Apr 79-Mar 80 Jun 80-May 81_
< 0.6 mph 0.02
- 0. 0~/
0.06 0.00 0.6 - 3 5 mph 17.58 15 66 4.43 3 11 3 6 - 7 5 mph 41.67 39 99 18.51 16.08 7.6 - 12.5 mph 30.22 30.06 39.80 39 01 12.6 - 18.5 mph 8.63 11.72 28 34 30.41 18.6 - 24.5 mph 1.74 2.20 6.56 8.52
> 25 5 mph 0.14 0 30 2 31 2.88 Data Recoverability Rate 98.8 99.9 98.6 99 9 (m
x 1
l I
F203160216 920309 PDR ADOCK 05000443 C
p9g
SB 1& 2 R:vicion 1 ER-OLS F bruary 1982 TABLE 451.02-2 COMPARISON OF ANNUAL WIND DIRECTION DISTRIBUTIONS (Values in 5 of Time)
Wind Direction 43' Wind Direction 209' Wind Direction (Direction From)
Apr 79-Mar 80 Jun 80-May 61 gr_79-Mar 80 Jun BT May 81 N
3.82 2.36 4.89 4.16 NNE 2 54 1.56 4 32 2.41 NE 4.02 3 35 4.11 3 31 ENE 3 70 2.87 3 15 2.73 E
4.52 3 58 3 06 2 37 ESE 4.08 2.67 3 57
'2.64 SE 4.79 4.19 4 30 4 33 ssE 3 59 2.55 5.11 3 61 S
4.47 3 22 5 33 3 86 SSW 6.08 6.87 6.71 5 73 SW 7 77 10 35 9 2?
10.81 WSW 8.87 11 37 7 68 9 57 W
10.27 12 73 8.85 11.40 WNW 17.72 18.83 14.82 15.39 NW 9 90 10.03 10.86 13 12 NNW 3 86 3 46 3 97 4.55 Data Recoverability Rate 98.5 99 4 98.8 99 9
e SB. 1& 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS February 1982 TABLE L51.02-3
[^h "
'v' COMPARISON OF ANNU AL AT140 SPHERIC STABILITY CLASS DISTRIBUTIONS (Values in 5 of Time)
._43'-150' Delta Temperature
_ 43'-209' Delta Temperature Stability Class Apr 79-Mar 80 Jun 80-May 81 Apr 79-Mar 80 Jun 80-May 81 A
6.52 12.45 2.22 4.68 B
9 06 8.78 3 37 5 35 C
5 53 5 59 7 08 6.15 D
41.54 42.61 43 31 45.68 E
24.25 17 34 30.38 23 59 F
6.94
%.88 7.76 8 31 G
6.14 6 35 5.87 6.23 Data Recoverability Rate 98.1 96.9 98.6 99 7 y
Q o
9
I i
k khh!k k
e u u u u u u
4
~
- -~ o.
~
n
% R.,
~ " " "
- e s
- n ~ ~ ~
m
~
ss co
. o o o.
o,h c
o
? 7 7 7 ?
?
y u u u u u u
wE' e
- o.
w w
e
,,t
>a eo
- n n n n n
aw:
-u-
~... ~
? ? ? ? ?
Y
% n u u u u u u
n.. ~ ~
~
.OR 1
g n ~ ~
~
e
~
~
R
? II.~
?
? ?
y u u u u u u
n.
~.
n
~
o ~
~
n
~
g 37 4 4 4 4 4
<B k=u=
go
~... ~
~
- U" u
" O
? ? ? ? ?
?
- n u u u u u u
g5
% 4 m. n O
1
$=
R.,
9 =. ~
.9 9
~
=
~
~6 o
N N
~
N g0 m
o
~ Y.Y~?
?
~o g2 T
?
~
?
y y u u u u u u
ma u
o g
e ~ - =
n 3 42 mu C
g g d.;.
.~ ~ ~. n u
mn a
~... ~
~
gf
? ? ? ? ?
?
~
u u u u u u
==
- o.. ~
<g"-
O.*
1
~ " * *
~.. ~
2 o
s 5
g T o'
.. ~ ~
~
R
? ? ? ? ?
?
~,o 27 m u u u u u
. - o ~ o
=
1 2
- * ~
9 o,,,
=.. - n X:
. ~ ~ n.
- 2. g 3
R 3 3 = E
=
~ n n n a w a
I 16
~
o'
- 2 l
.=
~
u E
g g
u a
u u
o i
n 7
b
~
I
~
3 1 23 9
~
m V2
! 3 K.
4*
O 3 9
-., a a e.
~
- = > d'
22 E w.:
2
^
a = 2 l
i.
SB 1& 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS February 1982 TABLE 451.02-5 COMPARISON OF ANNUAL AYESACE TUR8INE BUILDIMC DItAf710N FACTORS AND DEFOSITION RATES FOR SELECTED BECEPTOR IACATIONS Downwind Dietence Undepleted I/O (sec/m3)
Depleted I/O (sec/m3) ca ma x/0 (sec /e3)
D/o (t/.2)
Rectater Sec t or..
(Meters) 4/79-3/80 6/80-5/81 4/79-3/80 6/80-5/81 4/79-3/80 5/80-5/81 4/79-3/80 6/80-5/81 pesidence and Ca rden ESE 2398 127 E-06(1) 1.23 E-06 1.06 E-06 1.06 E-06 6 64 E-07 6.48 E-07 3.17 E-09 3.07 E 49 Vesitable Milk oow ItWE 3862 2 27 E-07 2.36 E-07 1.90 E-07 1.97 E-07 1.41 E-07 1.48 E-07 5.02 E-10 3.52 E-10 Milk Osat Int 3842 1.48 E-07 9.56 E-08 1.25 E-07 8.35 E-08 1.01 E-07 7.17 E-08 3.31 E-10 2.45 E-10 Mut Anteel u
3219 2 10 E-07 1.34 E-07 1.78 E.07 1.16 E-07 1.36 E-07 9.25 E-08 4.22 E-10 2.85 E-10 Sits Beendary ESE 914 5 65 E-06 5.48 E-06 4.96 E-06 4.82 E-06 2.20 E-06 2.16 E-06 1.47 E-08 1.43 E-08 I
Th3 *Reche*
(Recreettenal Site)
ENE 318 2 14 E-05 2 36 E-05 1.95 E-05 2.16 E-05 5.C8 E-06 5.32 E-06 4.62 E-08 5.37 E-08 (1) g,37 g.06 = 1.27m10-6
TABLE 151.02-6 (Sheet 1 of 8)
JOINT FREQUENCY DISTRIB1TTION OF WIND SPEED. WIND DIRECTION.
AND AIMOSPHERIC BTABILITY CLASS FOR SEABROOK (Is3-FOOT LEVEL)
JUN80-MAY81
~
43.s FT alho 047A etastL171 CLane A CLASe FWEQUENCY (PERCEN7) e 82.e5 ogwe stpEC71nN F40M SPEED (MPN)
N NME ht ENE F'
Est et e5E 5
e9=
ew asa
=
kNw hm N4a Ve8L fn7st CALM e
e p,
,e a
, a a
e o
e o
e e
e n
,e e
e (11 e,ce 0,00 e.'30. e.co G.se 4.00 e.se e.ea 0.na c.no 0.00 n no n.co n.se n.se e.es n.no n.ee (2) s.se e en e.se 0.se n.pn
- n. e 1.e0 n.s.
0.00 e no e.no e.en o.no n.ov n.se o.00 n.e.
n.en C=3 a
1 I
i 5
t e
i g
9 2
e t
n I
t e
le (i) e.ee
- in
.in
- in 8=
.ie
...a
.to
- e. a n,no
.i.
3.
.in o.s.
.in
.in i.ni (21 e.no 91
.e1
.el 06 01 e.se
.el e.no c.no 02 05
.cl n.nn
.nl 01 a.ee 23 15 11 e
e 19 ps m 22 i.2e
- 2.3 a.7 e
1 2
e 33 2e 2e 6
a i.e3 i.ns 3a n.no iv.ee
==-
ri) 3e
- ie
.i.
76
- 2. 5 i. a 2.76 57
.se
.a.
2.0, (2)
.e5
.et
.e2 09 37 28 3s
.e7 05
.ne 11 26 24
.te 13 05 e.00 2.2s b5*
6 7
25 50 66 at 3
2e to e
5%a e
e=12 6
2 16 24 as 22 79
- 57 67 2.3e 4.76 6.28 7.71 7.99 2.76 1.33 0.co 12.33 (t) 57 l19 ll52 2l24 3.Al 2ln9 7.52 y
(2) 87
.e2 19 29 87 26
.es
.n7
.ne 3n 5e 78 96
.gn 3e 17 e.ee 6.52 13=lA e
- t 5
3 3'
e in a
e 5
(1)
- 3n
,to
.em l29 2*
e.to
.*5 3a
.34
{en 2.3n 16 26 no e7 3
0 21 5
1.52 2.e7 7.nl e e7 29 n.co 22.*3 (2) 45
..I 06
..e
.o.
e.00 12
.ns
.n5
.n6 36 19
.3t 45 56
..e e co 2.8%
19-28 e
e 6
e e
e e
e o
e i
e 6
25 la e
e 52 (1) 0;e. el0s 57.e;te e.se e 'e e e.g.
e.00 0.04 0 eo
.l.
..es 57 2.34 1.33 0.00 e ce, 4.95 (2)
..se
..e.
87 9.e.
..en 0.0.
- e. e e.ee e.ee 0.00
.nl e.es 87 30 17 e.co e.oo 62 l
67 2e e
e e
o e
e 0
e o
e o
e o
e a
e e
- e. o
..no e;ee
..no
..e.
e.g.
(i) s.6.
e,00 e.go e;oo e.e.
e.ee e ee a;o, e.on e;ee e.no e
e
..e.
e.e.
- n. e e.no e.e.
..en e.no
- g (2) e...
e.e.
...e o..o 0..e e.ee
..no a<
ALL SPEEDS te
,5
- 2. 0
,36 7,
e3 lin 17 15
,13 et ten 13e 2e3 102 22
- e 10%1 27 3
(t) 1.33 44 5
3.43 7.52 e.o9 11.23 t,62 t.e3 3 te 8.75 in.2e 12.75 19,31 g.71 2.09 0.00 len.pn ar (2)
.t7
.os
.it 43
.*e 51 1.se 2.
.in 3,
- i., i.2e i.50 2.ee i 2i 26 0.00 2.e5 ag 5"
(llePERCENT OF aLL C000 OASERVA110MA 20e 7N!s p4GE (21ePERCE47 0F ALL C000 OR8Eeva7 ION 8,70s,7H18 PERIOD Ce CALM (utN3 SPEEh Lese TMAN 04 EGUAL 70
.it MPM)
SB 1& 2 Ravision 1 l
ER-OLS February 1982 I
A eOC e M em 9 ee eo k a e 59==
4== e=
- 9 O e
== C e e
eO
- = e N e&M tr FF== = ae N 075 M eC eO>
e=
o e e e
==
e e8t e e en e e e o e e p=
e e
)
Oe
.a C
CC N
eN D= 3 g==
M O
2 fis e
se 8"=
E J
OOO OGO OOC 000 000 ese OOO 900 e
e O
DO OO DO OO 90
'09 e
e o e e
e e o e o e e e e e e e e e e '
eO CO CO OO OO OO OO OC O
a OOO e o to ese e= N e e te MOe OOO OOO M te art e-X OO tr* O pgs G te c 4 O OO OO
- b **
2 e o e e e e e e
- e
=J' oo ee
==
e ee
- 3 O
E eoe att p=
d a== >
tai pm O
== a >
e e ep
M
N Me te tha fte e t M M== #89 GP O
== O M P= e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e e e E.
s 2
eO eB E O F
O est e
ao 3*
a R
Oee OOO eey a a p=
M tre M eeF ena > N tra N O 4
em F
e&
OC
a-
e e te art== 4
= = = =
fte E MNe Z
e 3
e e o e o e e e e e e e o e es e o
>=
E Se Ce 8ts a
pm its E==
se
==
09 3
eOO se M== e #8'==
fts ftp Ap 9**==
eOO OOO O O GFt tai S
eo a= O
- e 5%
y* O 4 W==
OO Oc eep
,J e e e o eo e e ee e e ae o e OC Sts
- =
. OO OO O
O
==
taf M
e=
tw I
ceO
sm
OOe p== e E E er e a tr*
OOO 8%a r= s t a
a 3
U St CO
- = C fis > fts rim 9 784 CO Wt O OO e59 Pm WB 3
3 e e e e e o e e e e o e e e o e 0O e
O eO N
M
==
3 ene E
- 1 trt IP r= F e fis N W
= M
OCC ee4 2
se 8
e CO
== O
P=
MF e
= 4
- C OO e e r*
w
# %
8 R
OOO e o e e e o e e e o ee e o e o OO e
3 U
e
==
==
=J
&O X
4 see
# t
9====
M edt Ort
== c r84 OOe COO eeO u
i O
E 8
tas e
et Oe me O fns e=
> > =
a= e==
OO Oc s*% tr e O
O 1
C a= O g
R to WB
- a e
e e e
e e ae e e
- ae e' e 3
ee ee e
U a=
en e
Ce th F
J et e=
st teo eOe e a tr*
e====
N > 8%s
=M
OOO e e er 85 C
O e
ce OO te e fis==
84, O
-c eO
= - - =
e e e o ee e e o e e o e e e e Oc fte Of%
,J U
.=
u tas ee oO og gg e
n 4J c
t.s COO N r= #w O tri N e e p.
N e= ens OOO OOO eCst a
y m
OO NO mMe pCe NO OO DO wpm g
g C
e e o e e
- e e e e
- e o
e o e e "e
e OO eG M
i
=
U 2
CO h *@
e-i t
ese OoO M S e-O sc e OOO OOO eOO M en M 3
s eO OO N== fu em O sat eO eo OO se== 4 o
[
E*
t e e o e e o e o e e e o e o e e o
l ee eO M
e eO ee ep w ee UE e enJ ena CC e ooO
#86en 4==
Oee OOO OOO 9= e 4
&E E
e 83
'Se OO NeN fne IP 51 CC eO
'OO e 88* Id*
g 8
Et em6 e e e e o e
' s e e
e e ee e e ee 48 ee ee 5 43 M
ee ee eO e
em se KX D= >=
.9 ens eeO wa e8t==
WeW ftp p 4 OOO OOO OOO Nee u
eC
== O A# f% fts 84f F ftf eo ee ee e em art 3e e e o e o e e e e o e e e e e e CDNg.
so M
N em se so a
e
-.a 1
E ens OOO
s*g
eeE tr* As gr*
OOO OOe eee e O r=
en 2
ee
== O sts 6% fts
O
.e eO OO eee OO i
e=
ens
- e e
eo "ae ee
- e
- e e
- e e e ce em.
l WD ee M
800 eO ee ee WD D* e=
ad 4 a b" O s., a l
ese eM-OeN SOO See Mee t w 1
w
-M.==
te m
- = ew
- e. M -
eo eo e M
l z
=.
e e et et l
- e e
o e
- e e e s e e en e e e. e ne as w.
es es OC I
om j
w eee eee Mee est e er
== est== oee eoe
- p. e ar.
eo
[
4 a
X
- ee me ee ee
== e op ee ee OC l'
e e
- e e
- ee
- ee ee
- ee
- ee e e OO 2
ee
.S UU I e=s ee ee eb.:a lo 4
2 oee oOe N e= fis 4 - s=
As r= ns OOO OOe O trl fus
.J a
g ee OO NO eO Ms 6 eO Oe
* M=
4 at e e e o e e e e e o e e e o e e C
g eo Oe
==
36 h ee ee 00 e=
E e= D.
E ** 88*
886 ** 8'*
f* 8"* **
8%s M ***
4 ** 8"*
e ** ** e 8"a ***
WI #% s'*
Z2 l
e=
o== #g las ena b w e.,s E
J== ses e== e48 e== fts
==== res
==== fus As== N N== fts I
tb uo l
e e6 en =a ens uww aww 0 ma w g w me 3 w es*
== w e
a8t
>=
w aw e
E U
9 WW
==
886 S
ee e
O l
tad
.J sr= ee the 3
== *t0 4
S eg e.a w e
S i
e SB 1& 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS February 1982 4
4
.J O Es O s't en art MO&
S>e N p= >
OeW a r= >
Ms G F C
MC #
e as C e a= p= es e est d
&Og E s84 9 fts N 0%
ft,p e
e e e o=
- e e e a=
e e N e e o e e e O@
as**
ee W Sta M
W e
K C
OO Ms e==
I 989 e
er
==
E p=
E
. C.
e.
..e O.
4 e
o.
..e, 3.. e.
e.
.o e e o e e o e o ee e e e o e
e m.
a A
&C Se e
e o O
y eoe ooo its e s y= e a ooo ooe ooa esest e=
a E
e e e o e e o e e e e =_s eH
- C fis,
2 OO eC a= # we W O CO OO
. e e e e
.J as oo oe ac e
D oe oe ftf
==
o e #%#5 fts e e COO - ecO M ** **
Gn$
,e O W we WS 8
8 a
= = = = *
- ee M # 5 8
2 OC ftp C se sat==
a= C #w a= @ em CO
.~5 e e o e e o e e e o e e
-e e
e e E
b eoe N
O N
SC Gt C
CO X
P E
DeO 8%# N *%s
==
est e= 0 Oee
sM s86 Meu e
as er F
ee eC 9==
4 e 8%
ens 8% fts a= d==
ae eeE Z
e 5
e e e e e e e e e e ee e e e*
8 8
8%
l 8
WB Ce 5
==
om e
W*
O@ei.#44 tad
= * * ' *
s Ms e eC
@E4
.J W
EB C D ftf N 8%s
.9D D* As 8%s e*****
S
'e&
W e eC N>M
- C N ee e e W e
- e de o e
==
O S@ - k e e o e e e WD 984 r
e.
ens e=
8=
the
- e taf 3
OOO
- * = = = =
apt e 4 N&4 fts 8ts fes
= = = =
0OO\\== 9 y e=
8%a e N eL f4e O OE
'44e e
K o e E
E e o e e o e e o e e eo e e W:
O&
9%s O
= = = =
OO e
O L.
- 89 S
2 and om Oe 4 aft et X
1 C ee Oee tf% e E S5 W D a= es
= = =
s= e*==
&.s tft Ms per N F==
f%# O fts C W P'e e
e o e e o e e e e
WB 5O Oe
= = = =
'e X
a e e e e e
==
J ee oc est e
1 u
J e
2 S (< G&
M f%f Ms o
1md C
D E
oeo eoo eMM e p= 9 e > P=
= * * =
la a
WD eO OO ftp C a= F==
-At e ee fb P= s84 3
y
- e e ae i.e o
e e e
fts O ae se u
e.
- e e
- e e 3
a e
e-e
==
ft.
ec ac
.=
g is e
me e..
tea
.... e. e g
e6 s ae no es ae se eo ae
' o e n o e
e e e o e e o
==
eo Ce ae e
e-o e
. e o e e g
rA O
.a u
eC eo u
and
(
O w
peo
,vNN eye eNN one Nea E
d M
Ms o fis e oo fis e fis a e e e e eo es. = * = =
e o e o e e e e e e
- a. o.
eo e
p e
n O
st fis
==
eO p
g, a
ecs=== ene omo N==
a g F.
ee oe eG eo fts o eo ec
46
c N
(/J w
som con ger e e e e e e e e e o e e e e e e C
- f ee oc fts w=
b UR a=
ee ec as nne ens eoe e====
em a ar.
- e. et s enE oeo eoo te e e a&
St te f%s C WO
@ e 5* O -
eC CC
s=
U WD e e e e e e
- e *
- e e
- e e WD e
==
Ce GC eO
- 80 em o=
ZK WD me e e e=
ee
=e W
see NNN em a O
>ee oee eeo Mr 84 N e tf* ef*
or eG ue eC sut & W WW e e e e e e e e ao DE
&C en e Ptr
== S. 8%s er
, em. N..
e e e
e o
' sat ee eo o=
est dM eo
==
y
+
. mee a**
em.
=
ee.
- in e rr Ms C eo eC SC Sts e 84 OO a
w see oeor p
- e e me me
- e 1 e e
- e e
e e
- e'
-eo
- = = = = =
==
ee oe ee e
>*P-as 2
.e e
- ee e o
<t
- F*
he ee eo Ost e
tas ee e de e e tft as*
fte eW Me e W e We eft eCe
- ts EI' 13 mE
.s a t y= est ens ens r
3 ee d= e g e
@
= Wn a
ee ee W e e *
- ee f e
- F e WD e ee 4
ee
- W e
er e e e N
WW CD eo ee ens eeo Pts N fe em e m
= = = = *
- eoe eee eoe 4m>
cO e
s
- e e
-e 85 me 9ts e oe ee ee f4e e CD e e e O C-e ee e6 e e e e uo 2
ee e e e-eo ea ee a=
ee aO J s.=J e=
= = = = = = eoe eee oee e
eO ee fte e em San **
fis e ee ee fts fis Ms se 4 z
eeo eoo e > r=
fat art op C
e e a e e e e e o e e e
- e e
e e ee eC W
ek &
O N
C0 f
ee ee em om
> e=
E 8***
G 84 8*
8****
WB ** 8=
22 Z
.J== Ms S ** Ms 0 ** MS
====N
==== fis fts =e f4e fna== ens O== Mi and and 9 5 ** 8*
P=****
fis ** **
p=
8
- = * = =
- ens ** **
Uu 8=
3 ** 89 e
a6 ue ** **
u*=***
e ** *m*
C***=*
4****
9****
SW h
s't D=
ene
==
G ens hp 4E O&
o E
4J e
9 GW 88%
'o S
e
.J em Ms me
.s 4
68
- E e
&e
m cr 9
[
t e3.0 F7 alm 0 na7a 37aMil ITY CL AI9 n ClasR FRF4U(NCY (PFNCEN71 a m2.Al
=fwo DinEC7ttlN Fanu SPEEO(mPM)
N NME WE ENE F
ESE 8F SSL S
SS=
, Sh
- Sw w
uw=
hw NNw V e ni, 7nf al, Calm o
e o
o a
n o
e a
n n
o a
n e
o a
n (11 0.00 s.ea e,co. e.so n.en e.en e.en e.co o.co e,co a.co e.co s.co e.ac o.no e o0 n.no a.no (2) 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 e.no e.on e,az e.go 9.co e co e.no e,co n.00 p.oo c.co e.On o.co n.nv C=3 17 13 13 13 11 12 18 il 13 3n 11 23 28 27 3n la o
2pe (11 47 46 36 36 31
.T3 50 31 3h lA) 31
.he
,7e 75 83 19 n.oo 7,9e g
(2) 20
.l1 45 15 33 14 28
.t3 15 36
.l3 27 33 37 36
.l7 e.co 3.36 a.7 54 sA a2 66 se 55 77 57 9e 127 ls5 138 152 los 13e inn e
lee)
(1) 1.50 1.31 1.17 1.41 let1 1.93 2.le 1.5m 2.50 3,53 a.n3 3.As e.23 a.41 3.61-2.95 c.On el.sl (2) 6a 57 50 79 47 65 98 68 l.n7 1.90 1.72 l.63 1.80 1.'7 l.sa 1.Pe e.00 17.69 A=l2 17 15 68 20 20 15 Pa 25 3e 123 16e le7 156 26l In3 3e 0
12lA N$
(1) 47
'42 IJA9 56 56 e2 56 70 95 3;e2 C.e5 s.09 e;3a 7.26 2.A6 95 0.0c
- 33. A r.
69 g
(2) 20
.le
.Al 24 2e 10 28 10 40 1.a6 1.90 1.7a 1.85 3.09 1.22 80 0.00 te.s3 e,
w e 13=la 8
3 28 1
5 5
2 9
11 31 in 23 66 143 75 2
o 502 u
(t) 22
,08 7A l83
.le its 96 25 31
.P6 1.19 6s 1.83 5.09 2,09
.o6 n.On 13.96 (2) 09
.Se 33 01
.n6
.e6
.n2
.it et3 37 59 77 78 2.'7 89 02 n.on 5.95 19=2a o
e 3
e 5
l 1
0 2
2 a
5 0
a5 17 0
0 85 (1), 0.00 0.80 0A 0*00
.le l03 03 n.00 06
.no
.it
.la 9.'80 1.25
..a7 0.00 0.00 2.36 el 0.00
.n?
.n2
.ng 06 a.00 53 20 0.00 0 On 1.nl (28 0.00 0.00
.Se 0.00 66
.nl e
87 24 0
n 0
0 e
o l'
C 0
1 0
0 0
7 2
o 0
15 (l) 0.00 tl60 0.00 0.00 11 0.00 03 0.00 0.00 03 e.no s ee e.oo 19
.on 0.00 e.e0
.a7 (2) 0.00 9.00 4.00 0.00
.n%
0.00 01 0.no 4.on
.nl e.On 0.00 0.00
.de 02
'0.00 0.00 18 ALL SPEEDS 96 79 15e lee Ag Am 119 In2 15e 3ta 370 336 402 6A9 357 156 e
1597 (t) 2.67 2.'2 n 4.28 2.78 2.16 2.'a 5 3.31 2;ee e.17 8;73 10.29 4.3e 11.18 19.85 9 92 E.38 0.00 100.00 7E (2) 1.18 94 1.A2 1.14 lent lose 1.at 1.21 1.Te 3.72 a.3A 3.94 a.7e 9.16 e.23 1.n5 0.00 a2.tl tr g Um (llcPERCENT OF ALL C000 008ERV4JIO93 /OR 7NIS PAGE
- y (21ePERCEN7 0F ALL C000 ORSERV4710N0; fos 7NIS PER103 Ca CALM (WINO SPEED LESS THAN 04 EQUAL 70
.Se >PM) f :s g*
5 l
TABLE h51.02-6 (Sheet 5 of 8) 4 1
03.0 FT mIhD Data stantLiff class E CLaS9 FWFUUENCY (PENCENT) w 17.3a ulwu pinEC?tnN Feow e
SPEE0(MSN)
N NN(
Ng ENE F
Sim SW WBa d
www hw NNw vant 70 fat t
e e
o e
o e
o o
e e
e 1
Cata e
e
.,,g
,, e o
,47 e.e.
n.no e nn e.oo e.on e.no e,ng e.ee e.no 8.co 0.00
.n?
ft) 9.99 e.no 9.c
,rege.
..en
.on
.el e en e.no n.no e.co n.co a.co e.es n.se e.oo e.co c.co
.nl (2) s 00 e.co 0.se 0.08 C-1 12 13 10 to in t3 11 se 25 27 23 33 en 33 33 2o o
3nt (1)
.A2
.A9
.ta
,64 1.23
.R9 75 1.71 Ifee 1.57 7.25 1.28 2.25 2.25 1.17 n.co 23.e3 (2)
.le 15 12 12 21 15 13 47 30 12 27
.39 57
.3'
.39 2a e.go a.nt a=7 20 7
e 7
17 9
26 Id 37 69 122 155 te.
161 77 2A o
49'
.. i.i.
..i i.7a
..a 2.53 0;7 a.33 ie 5, is.n n.n.
5.2.
i..i
..on
.i.si n,,,
- a to i.37.e...i
.e7 00 20
.ll 31
.l2 88 42 f.e5 t.no 1.75 1.*l 91 33 0.00 in.65 7 to (2) 28 o
p A=17 2
0 2
e 2
e v
5 1
2t a3 a3 33 se 2
2 e
les g*
(t) 10 0,00
.le e.'e n
.la
..se 8.00 34 67 Ife3 2.*e 2.9e
.a*
1.08 l.e3
.te 0.00 13.49 (2) 82 e.se
.e2 0.08
.e2 0.00 8.00
.e6
.el 25 51 91
.t5 52 25
.n2 e.pn 2.16 u
13 1e 0
a 1
e 1
e t
I t
2 6
i e
3 i
n te (1) 0.00 e,co Je7 s.'80
.e7 e.es
.e7 07
.n7
,se
,et
.o?
e,ee e.co 20 07 e.co 1.23 (2) e,co 0.00
.et o.co
.es e.00
.el
.el
.nl
.n2 87
.nl e ee n.no
.ca
.on o.co 2
1 e
i e
e e
o 0
3 le=2m
.0 e
O e
i e
8 e. e
- e. 0
.7 e;eo
.e7 a.oo e.no
..no e;eo
.., e;eo e...
to e,no e;..
e,.ee
. o.co n.no 2.
(2) e.Ce e.so so 0.03 01 e.ep e.oo 6.e0
.nl 0.e9
.nl e.00 n.no e.00 0.00
- e. 0
- n. 0 03 GT 2#
e e
o e
0 e
o 1
.. 0 e
e a
1 0
0
- e. 0
...o
. e;en.. 0 m
- e..
e.e.
,e7 e...
e,co
. n.no.. 0...
..so e,0 07 (2)
...e 8.ee e.00 e.no 9.e4 01 0.0n 6.00 0.00 0.00 a.n3 0.00 e.00 n.co 8.00 0.00 0.00
.nl ALL SPEEDS 38 28 19 17 3e 2a 34 To 65 lie l*5 232 209 239 13e 51 e
lens (1) 2.32 If37 1.3e 1.16 2.6e 1.6s 2.en 2.ns a.se Aft 3 13.32 15.85 la.28 14.2n e.15, 3.es e.co too.no 2@
(2) 2e 23 2.
28
.a5 1.
77 i.
2.si 2.75 2..a 2.a2 i.5
...o e.no i7.3 gs c to (1)s*ERC[N7 0F aLL C000 ORStavaf.10NA. EOR TNIS Pact oU (2)ergeCENT OF aLL C000 008Ewwa710NS.,FOR TNIS >geIOD Ce CALM (WIND SPEED LESS TNaN OR EeVal 70 58 MPM) 5 g
SB 1& 2 Revision 1 February 1982 ER-OLS
=
\\f
.J woo
... e nee
..is aw N e sw
.on coo
-o.
e sc e >== c== grt
= > =
sat c oe oo aoa o=
e e ens e e yet e e e e ee e e e e art e e C
ee art m ew s t
==
oe oo ee
.e.
a e
E e
art SL*
E 8
t J
Coe ooe eoo oeo oC o ooe ooc eme e
I E
em oo oe o er oo eo eo ee art e
e e e e e e e e e e o e e e e
e' e
e en oe oe o e' oo eo ee oo O
o #t ooo ooo es e o ooe oee
== p s ens a
oco o aw sts
==
co oo oo eo
- ts e ens g
K eo
= > =
I e o e e o e e e e e e o e e e e
=J ce
==
==
eo oe oe oe s84 as i
"3 5
ooo est e e e a r=
sts a tw ooe ooo eoo Mee ens etae e et art est e oe oe oo ENe a
E oo e o e e o e e e o e e e e o e e er ea ya e
oe oo oe O
==
X S
E OOS e art c e *** 8ts ans e sw
= = > = = ooo ooo art e e as etc
== o go o co== > #st 1
s s
2 eo est s e
>ee e
3 e e
,e e
e e o e e e o e e e se o e 4
sc are est ec eo e==
==
es e=
en B
oeo fhe sat e e4>
eoo coo ooe oeo oe>
ene B
Co e sw ert a sw art eo ee eo eo eeo
J e o e e ee e e e e e e e e e e 6C p
e eo eo ee oe art==
O
==
ma ens ens 3
eoo sta== e e art e eoo = = > = = eoo ooo N s*t e aL E
u et co est er sat ers== >
eo
=== e 1e e oo ee C en e
a e o e e e e e e e e o e e e e e ans ea ert e
eo oo eo art==
O
==
2
==
E "3
B ceo ced
> ett ens N e tw ooe eoe ooo e ett o me s t== sat sie a m van e oo ec oo art== >
w a
et eo u
o e e e e e e e e o e e a e o e E
oo ar=
e oe eo ee a
I
==
J esa
.e
- 3 K
e
= = > = = aoe oeo ooo eoM u
ens e sw eat e a.rt O
O R
ooo
- o est aw a.
e eo oo y
eu p
==#w
=
.= c ans e
et oo
- ae
- ae g
a em up ae
- ae
- ee ae e
g m
se set et oc eo oo e
u E
et O
8 en
==
e5 oee e art==
ort e e== >==
ooe ooe oeo art E e se e en tri==
Eo
== e ee eo se o
tre
=J u
e e e e o e e e e e o e
'e e
e e oo eC eo fw
\\
3 u
ene eo
==
a c
ew coo Cee eee
= > = = ooo eoe ooo e ett=
= 9 es en eo est c ee
e oc eo eo tr*
p g3 O
en e e e-e
- ee
- e e
ee ae e e
- ae pg E
so
==
me e9 eo eo
==
g e=
b W
ese Ese eme
>
Oro one 900 N>e es ea est s ye s
== a eo ee oe
e
c e o e e ee e e e e o e o e e e O
ee ee eo see W==
ee
==
u er as nas e e t s.
E e, k
s W
eoo art e e = = > = =
eoe coo eeo oeo 4R e
Oc se
== c ee so oc
-eo ee t
e ae er e
- ee
- ao ae
- ae et as
- e e
- ae es as as ee ee eC ee ee
==
o====
)
KK
=J
>= >
ek*
Ceo sa 8t# e e e ert eoe ooo eoe eoo
>eE u
ee er e ac ee oc mo em eu o ee e e e o e e e e ee oe e o e e O t3
=
f.
o=
ee ee eC eo ee
==
est A a
d et a
w c o es e er==
set ens er eoe oeo ooe oeo aw p= e 2y
==
I >
an,
- ae ae
-ya e os eo eo eo
e
0O an z
eo art==
'ru e e o= es ee ae ee
- re
- a e
se>
ee eo eo oo e us e se
=
ee 3= >
4.00
.co coe
.ee e.
o n e.
p.e
.co
- ee e e ee e e ae So so
-e e
.e
.48.
em ee o e e e e e en ers eo ee ee ee se ee ee
==
OO au eoo s*t 0% e a= >== eee oce oao oeo e e en DD 2
eo eri e
== m ee
+e o eo eo ee OO e ee e e
- ee
- ee
- e e ae DC e
3 ee ae ee e, e me se es o es
=.J =J e
. a,J e t e art D
s 2
oeo
== e n su e ens eoe ooo eoe eoo C
eo
e
sat e sa e oe ee oo
ew
.s og E
e e e e
- ee e o ee o e e e e e
- ee ee su hh oe oe
=*
ee es=
OO 8
9 g
I >h
=
e em one Ez ese E em sam
- 8't e= s==
> en sue N e'= a=
e ** s==
a e= e's e san e==
3
=J
= ou 8== ses 9 a= N
==== fis
=*== 8ts ris =* fis f4== ets O== 8ts ep W e
n na e= me o se me a w en 8ww 8ww 8 me ene me me M e,o m,e uu e
e86 e
D=
ens ee o
E u
==
==
ED E
w and s89
==
e ma
=*
e o
mo eat
J s= a=
\\
tf
.J N
e e
SB 1& 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS February 1982 e
G d
J tr* 886 e D== 9 Oee N >= N
- 4. O O OOC eOO 4 O tre
- e
& G PP W GP W 9*
sWt &
OO CO OC e' O 8m o*
- e M e e se e e e e e e e e o e
- e e cO Oc Os Oe
=
De
> = =
O Z
C 9"*
P=
N
==
E E
6 OOO OCO OeC 6ao ooo OOe 900 DOO e
t Oe OO eO eO Oe OC ee ee d*
m o e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e
OO OO OO SO Ce OC OO eS C
a se y e-
>-s
,86 a e C OO OOO COO COO
= ttt s t e
a E
== C MG ar* O
-OO G&
OO OO
O
3 e e o e e e e e e e e e e e e e J
Cs OC OO ee sts e
3
==
O OOO OOO COO 4 art 4 w
X eC pat e w
== e* A#
== o eo oO CD te e as 3
OOO
>Ce e 4==== 9 em e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e o E
CC ee oO e
O 3b se 8
Ce d
X
>ete COO OOO OOO OOO WW D E e
a E
o= C E4O trt 44 CO OC C C C C ee&
K s
Wt B
.=9==
e>O 3
e e e e e e e e e e e o e e
= e e s
F se e
9O eC
& Gb SC 4 e=
fte et e
e 4
==
e-3 eee es a= 4
- R & P.
COO OCO OOO S@O e O 58%
W OO E== 9 NNN CO OO
&C OO O 4 f%e
.J e
' e e e e e e e e e e o e e OO Wt G
eO OO OO OO 9
a=
O e e e e
==
w e=
tad ee trt # 1 pm eeC COO OOO OOO OOO F S tre es e=
e OO 4== 7m N4N OC eO CO CC EeC e
I 8
3 OC O m
e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e w
eO Stf W
eO
&e Oe OO 4 a=
C u
==
2 ee tes
==
3 w= y==
gr* em.= Nee cpD nOO coe aeo ae>
3 e
== C 98* trt S
f%#
=*
e,*
e e o e e e e e e e e o e o e e e
fts eG CO OC OC C
3 U
2 O
C 4
O C, O ou e 5 tr* m a OeC eOe OOO oOO P= P. c u
ten e
3 I
hk S
e CC
- tb==
- D
'OO O&
CO CO
- a=
N a f e ae
'e
- ae
- e e
5 eO CO OO OC 0*n u
a eF e e' e 2
tm.
e OC She 0
^
ts N
CD F
e aeo trt m a oCO OOO coe O e.: O OOe ist s85 a 1
O 9
C e
ce eC eO es De OO DO eO ed O
o e o e o e o e o e o e o e o e 44 en e=
=
.2 u
eo OO eO OO OO sn ee u w
.:t e.-
e 43 O
w o00 eN>
-p=
COO 900 000 000
>=c g
en ee
-e
== C OO OO Oe O s,
=8i O U
C e
e e e o e e e o e e e e
- e e
e e CO f) e se oo
==
M 2
ee em w
COe acO
e
o 4==
COO ooc OoO N>N ee
[4 Oh 90 eo e= O ee e eO ee e v.
pnt s c
e o e e ee o e o e o e e e e e D
se se eO w oe OE ee eo en taJ taf C ee N>N eOO OOO OOO eOO OOO NWN
& es O
- 9O OO Oe ee Se eO
- 89 O
- e e
59 59 e
4 enJ
- e e
- e e
ae
- e e
'e e
e e e e 8
St W3 eC om ea ee eO eC ee ee ZX ee e
D= S=
w
@&S tr* s86 S f%f 9= N CCe OCO OOO COO P=== E
.J ee pO 886 C Oe CC eO OO 988 e WW u
e e e e e e e e e e 0C ag h..
e=
eC eC eO eO
==
e e o e eo eC ee o=
w See W* C e== e==
COO OOe Oee CDe S&D 2Y
,,g C. O
9
e=
== a SO
.O O e e, e, O, e
e o ef R
eO
== E -
e e e
ee eO eO eC fW oo>
t=
ene e e o e
+y e
o e e
es 4 ee 9ts e
e.O meo CD.
n.
- 3 Se O
eO Se ee
.. ww 4..
. N.= W.
e.s e 99 e e o e e ee e e e o e e e o e e En en w,
e.=.
ee ee
'ee ee ee
==
EE CO enn w== e== c > ogs Oee eee OC D Oce ooe== art sa CC 3
m wa E
eo ee ee ee ee e e so CC e
3 e e ae o e
'ae ae er e
- e e
- ae OC ee e&
ee ee ee Ob u 47 e=
2.,2
.OOe se e e
.J.J as 3
eoe e e==
s86 e e oOO OOe OOe ee 4==
We e OO Oe Oe eO se fis==
es e O
e e o e e e o e e o e o e e e e 3
ee ee ee ee sef a6 46 O
CD ee
==
==m h* I" I ** 8"*
8'l 8'* ** >* ** en f%6 8"* e's C s== **
S ** 8'm S e's s=
WB em em 2F MS O== fts w tad
$1=
8 a= N O== 8tf
====N
==== f%s N== N 8%e =.=a e.a e
w me ene uu h
en u en w e== me S== ese 8 en ame S *a =*
Je m=e= N 3
e M
taf aa e
3 u
S ens tna a
g6 e
E&
pat ee a*
en*
S
.,,b om em me
.3
- N 8
en0 es w ma 6e
TABLE 14 5
-6 (Sheet 8 of 8) i l
1 j
43.e P7 alNO DATA STAmitt1Y Clae5 Att CLAe8 FNEQUENC7 (PERCENT) e 190.80 l
wlm0 Ol#EC710N raou l
N N=E wt ENE E
SS*
Su WSW W
WNW NW NNb VRML fnfAL SPE ED (m'PN)
CALM 0
I
..L.... e 0
I e
o 0
,e i
o o
1 a
1 o
6 ft) 0.00 41
.el *e,00 e.00 01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 01 0.no 0.no
.ol n.pn 01 0.00 07 (2)
. 00
.et 01 0.00 e.co
.el e.no c.co e.no e.as
.o1 0.co 0.co
.ol n.co 01 e.co
.n7 C=3 a9 a2 3A a9 e5 se 17 as 52 92 In2 199 203 180 too 56 e
1322 (si 50 50
.e5
- 5s 53
,'s o
.as
.s2 62 t,a*
i.2:
i.=8 7.so 2.i3 t.66 its a.c0 i5.so i
j (21
.l.
5.
.e5 50 53
.ao
,as 52 62 1.n*
1.21 1.84 2.40 2.13 1.66 66 0.00 15.a6
- =7 91 63 59 12e 135 113 163 92 le3 232 3s3 a33 st?
502 301 165 0
3376 (1) 1.n.
,7%
7e 1,s7 1.6a 1.1e 1.93 1,ng 1,69 2;75 a 06 5.13 a.9s 5.95 3.57 1.e5 0.04 39.99 l
(2) 1.e8 74 7n t.e7 1.60 1.3e 1.93 l.e*
l.h9 2.75 a.o6 5.13 a 9e 5.95 3.57 1.95 e.00 39.99 mm 6=12 as 31 116 65 181 70 11.
61 55 197 312 307 329 e61 200 6l o
253a 7*
(Il 52 25 1.37 77 1.2e
- 83 1.63 72 45 2;33 3.70 3.68 3.9e 5.s6 2.37 72 0.00 30.06 0
121 52 25 1.37 77 1.20 43 1.63 72 65 2.33 3.7e 3.6s 3.9e 5.at 2.37 72 0.00 30.06 EH e
13=le 15 5
56
,e 9
5 la s7 I4 95 107 51 119 337 168 9
0 989 g,
(l)
.in
,e6 66 05 11
,06
.I7 29 21 65 1.27 60 1.el 3.99 l 99
.lt 0.00 11.72 (2)
.in
.e6 66 05
.Il 06 17 20
.21 65 1.27 60 1.el 3.99
-l.99 33 n.co 11.72 Ig=2a e
13 0
6 I
I I
e 3
A 10 7
97 35 0
o 186
.is e;en
.7
- ei
.ei 0i 05
.os
,09
.i2
.co i.i5
.ai n 00 e.0o 2,2.
0;.eo (in e.no so 15 0.0c of7
.at
.pl 01
.n5
.cs
.n*
.I2
,pe 1.35
.sl 0.00 0.00 2.2n (2) e.00 OT 2e e
n 0
o 6
I I
o e
1 1
e e
12 3
e o
25 (t)
- 0.00 e,eo 0;e6 0 00 07 01
.el e.00 0.00
.' a l
.ul o.00 0.00
.le
.os c.e0 e;eo 10 (2) s 00 e.se e.no 0.00 07 01
..el 8.00 0.00 01 01 0.~e o. 00 38
.ca 0.00 0.00 30 g
y, eo neef D' <
ALL setEpe 199 112 283 282 302 225 35s 215 272 5as sTe 960 to75 1590 es?
292 o, eo too co E7 (1) 2.36 1;56 3.35 2;87 3.98 2.67 a.19 2.55 3.22 6.97 10.35 11.37 12.73 ta.n3 10.03 3.a6 (2) 2.36 1.56 3.35 2.R7 3.5m 2.67 a.19 2.95 3.22 6.A7 10.35 11.37 12.73 lA.83 10.03 3.86
.o.00 100.00 *7
&v (1)spERCENT OF ALL C000 08SERVA110h4 K08 THIS PAGE (21e8ERCENT OF ALL Cn00 ORSERVATIONS FOR THIS PERIOD Ce Cat M (WIND SPEED LESS TMAN OR EQUAL 70 58 MPM)
4 SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 1 of 15 g-s b
TABLE 291.10-1 Public Service Company of New Hampshire SEABROOK STATION Chronology of Licensing Events Date Event Februa ry 1,1972 Application filed before the State of New Hampshire Site Evaluation Committee and Public Utility Commission for a Certificate of Site and Facility.
Ma rc h 30, 1973 Application for a Construction Permit and Operating License tendered by PSNH to the Atomic Energy Commission ( AEC), the agency then responsible for coordinating review by all government agencies, including specifically the Environmental Protection Age ncy.
July 9, 1973 AEC dockets application.
29, 1974 Certificate of Site and Facility issued by New
( ) January Hampshire Public Utilities Commission approving the plant fer the State.
April 12, 1974 AEC Staf f issued the Seabrook Station Draf t Environmental Statement for review and comments by the public, the Council on Environmental Quality and other Federal, State and local agencies including specifically, the EPA.
This document weighs the environmental, economic, technical and other benefits of the proposed Seabrook Station against environmental and other costs, considering available i
alternatives.
l l
August 2, 1974 Application filed with EPA for a waiver to Section 316 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to allow use of cooling of the plant using ocean water brought in and then discharged through large diameter tunnels. This application was required due to a change in the EPA's regulations requiring a waiver for this type of cooling water system.
Augus t 14, 1974 AEC Staf f issued their Safety Evaluation Report for Seabrook Station.
This report sumnarizes the results of the technical evaluation of PSNH's proposed design.
[ '\\ Auguct 21-22, 1974 Advisory Comnittee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS)
\\'-
subcommittee meeting and cite visit.
l i
SB 1 & 2 R: vision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 TABLE 291.10-1
( Cont inued)
Da t e Event September 6,1974 ACRS Committee meeting with PSNH and NRC Staf f.
October 9,1974 Second ACRS subconmittee meeting with PSNH and AEC Staff.
October 31, 1974 Second ACRS Committee meeting with PSNH and AEC Staff.
December 5, 1974 Third ACRS subcommittee meeting with PSNH and AEC SLaff.
. December 6, 19/4 Final Environmental Impact Statement issued by the NRC Staff.
December 10, 1974 Letter report by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards recommending construction of the proposed Seabrook Station.
December 1974 Final Environmental Statement by the NRC Regulatory Staf f reflecting review comments by the public, the lh Council on Environmental Quality, and Federal, State and local agencies, inc1rding specifically the EPA.
Ja nua ry 19, 1975 AEC abolished; regulatory responsibilities assumed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
Ja nua ry 30, 1975 EPA public hearings on PSNH's requested exemptions f rom thermal ef fluent limitations and on design criteria for the intana of the proposed once-through cooling system Sections 316(a) and 316(b) of the Federal Uater Pollution Control Act.
(The Seabrook proceedings were the first under Section 316(b) for inta ke s).
March 19, 1975 EPA released its DETERMINATIONS approving the once-through open-ocean cooling system with conditions relating to both the design and location of the intake structure.
May 16,1975 EPA issued clarifications to their DETERMINATIONS.
May 2 7, 1975 Atcmic Safety and Licensing Board ( ASLB) hearings began on health and safety issues.
O
t SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 3 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1
( Cont inued )
Da t e Event May 29,1975 State of New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission issued their Section 401 Certificate approving the once-through cooling system.
June 24, 1975 EPA re-issued their DETERMINATIONS approving the once-through cooling system with the exact location of the intake structure and number of intake ports to be specified in the future.
July 3, 1975 ASLB public hearings on health and safety were completed.
August 25, 1975 EPA public hearings on proposed new intake location.
August 26, 1975 ASLB public hearings began on environmental issues pe rt i nent to Seabrook Station.
/~
30, 1975 EPA issued revised DETERMINATIONS with some detail k,N) September changes to the June 24, 1975 issue including s
specifying the intake location.
Oc tober 9,1975 State of New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission issued a modification to their Section 401 Certification to incorporate the EPA changes in the September 30, 1975 DETERMINATIONS.
Oc tober 24, 1975 Revised DETERMINATIONS issued by EPA approving a specific intake location. This location resulted in increasing the length of the intake tunnel about 4000 feet.
November 10, 1975 Intervenor Seacoast Anti-Pollution League requests
~
l adjudicatory hearing on DETERMINATIONS relative to intake location.
l November 18, 1975 ASLB public hearings on environmental issues completed.
November 25, 1975 EPA grants SAPL request for hearing on DETERMINATIONS.
O
1 SB 1 & 2 R2 vision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 4 of 15 T ABLE 2 91.10-1
( Continued )
Date Event Fe brua ry 23-27, 1976 ASLB Evidentiary hearing reopened.
March 23 - April 2,1976 EPA's adjudicatory hearing held on DETERMINATIONS.
May 21, 1976 Transcript and record of EPA adjudicatory hearing on DETERMINATIONS certified by EPA Administrative Law Judge Yost to EPA's Regional Administrator.
Jure 10,1976 EPA Regional Administrator returns case te Law Judge.
June 21, 1976 Law Judge returns case to Regional Administrator.
June 2 9,1976 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board releases " Initial Decision" on Seabrook Construction Permits.
July 7,1976 NRC issued Seabrook Construction Permits.
July 14, 1976 Appeal Board denied (ALAB-338) Motion to Stay Ef fectiveness of Initir.1 Decision Pending Review filed by SAPL on July 7 and supported by NECNP.
l July 21, 1976 Ruling released by U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, on " Environmental Ef fects of Fuel Cycle".
July - September, 1976 Various appeals filed on the Construction Permits.
August 13, 1976 Commission issued General Statement of Policy on waste management and fuel cycle (S-3 issues).
September 30, 1976 Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board's ( ASLAB)
Memorandum and Order ( ALAB-349) granting NECNP's motion to suspend Seabrook Construction Permits ef fective 10/8/76 pending review by NRC of the environmental effects of fuel cycle.
(See July 21, 1976 court decision).
Oc tober 5,1976 Commission's Order announcing its decision to review ASLAB's 9/30/76 decision ( ALAB-349), and setting date of 10/26/76 to hear oral argument.
Ef fectiveness of ALAB-349 thereby stayed.
O
t
' SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982
.q Page 5 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1 (Continued )
Jg ty, Event October 5,1976 Commission stayed effectiveness of ALAB-349 pending their own review.
October 6,1976 Appeal Board held in abeyance Motion to Feconsider Denial of Motion to Stay Effectiveness of Initial Decision Pending Review (i.e., Reconsideration of ALAB-338) because of review of ALAB-338 pending in First Circuit Court of Appeals.
October 13, 1976 Appeal Board granted Motion to reconsider ALAB-338.
Oc tobe r 13, 1976 Commission issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on S-3 issues.
October 26, 1976 Hearing before NRC on ASLAB's Memorandum and Order ALAB-349.
November 5, 1976 NRC announces suspension of proceedings on ALAB-349 gg overturning ASLAB's decision to suspend
)
construction, based on information which shows the t
environmental effects of fuel cycle are small.
November 8, 1976 Appeal Board reconsidered and lef t undisturbed ALAB-338.
November 9, 1976 Press conference announcing EPA's Initial Decision revoking their DETERMINATIONS of June 24, 1975 and October 24, 1975 regarding once-through cooling.
November 12, 1976 PSNH's petition for EPA Administrator's review of the November 9, 1976 Initial Decision by the Region I Administrator which revoked the prior DETERMINATIONS of the Regional Administrator.
Novembe r 26, 1976 Appeal Board denied requent by NRC Staf f to Consider Ef fect of EPA Regional Administrator's Initial Decision on Cooling Tower.
December 3,1976 NECNP Motion to reopen record and suspend Construction Permits.
I
' O
i SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 6 of 15 T ABLE 2 91.10-1
( Continued)
Da t e Event December 17, 1976 Memo and Order - Court of Appeals for First Circuit denying, without prejudice, petition to stay Construction Permit s.
January 21, 1977 NRC Appeal Board Memo and Order with respect to NECNP Motion of December 3,1976 ordering remand to the Hearing Board on certain issues and suspension of Construction Pernits effective February 4,1977.
Ja nua ry 24, 1977 Commission Order staying suspension of Construc* ion Permits until February 7,1977 and announcing Commission review and oral argument on February 7, 1977.
Fe bruary 7,1977 Commission Order requests guidance on future cooling system alternatives hearing.
Does not stay ALAB-366.
March 7, 1977 NRC requests inf ormation on alternate cooling.
Ma rc h 8, 1977 Oral argument to NRC ASLAB on evacuation beyond LPZ.
l March 9, 1977 ASLB postpones hearing on alternate sites and cooling indefinitely.
Ma rch 23, 1977 EPA Administrator requests more information on open cycle syatem.
Ma rch 2 5, 1977 Applicant responds to NRC 3/7/77 request for i nf o rma tio n.
March 25, 1977 NRC requests more information on cooling systems and alternate sites.
April 4,1977 Applicant responded to request with information on alternative system.
April 6,1977 Applicant responds to EPA request of 3/23/77 with information on backflushing.
April 7,1977 NRC suspends Construction Permits allowing limited activities to continue.
O
~
t SB 1 & 2 Ravision 1 ER-OLS reb ruary, 1982 Page 7 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1 (Cont inued )
Da t e Event May 23 - 26,1977 The Atomic Safety and Licensing Board held hearings on ALAB-366, the economic costs and environmental impacts which the optfor. of cooling towers would entail, as well as a comparison of the Seabrook sP.c to alternate sites in light of that evaluation.
June 2, 1977 SAPL/Audubon filed a motion before the Appeal Board to have the record reopened on PSNH's financial qualifications.
June 16, 1977 NECNP filed a motion before the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Ci rc ui t, for immediate stay of construction and related activities, pending appeal and review of all outstanding issues before the Court and NRC (need for power, NRC's standard of "obviously superior" sites, evacuation and emergency planning, financial qualification of PSNH, seismic design and nuclear waste handling and disposal).
( ) June 17,1977 The EPA Administrator issued his long awaited decision reversing an earlier decision by the EPA Regional Administrator who had ruled against the plant in November 1976.
In his decision, the Administrator af firmed the RA's initial finding that the plant's intake stiuctures should be at the "far site", which is 7000 feet at sea and 4000 feet beyond the original location proposed by PSNH; found that the adult Mya (clam) population would not be significantly reduced by larvae deaths caused by heat, and found that the intake and discharge tunnels represent best technology available in design and location of the cooling system.
June 17,1977 PSNH filed a motion before the NRC, ASLB and ASLAB for an Order reinstating the Construction Permits, due to reversal of the EPA Regional Administrator's decision.
June 28,1977 The NRC stated that the question whether the current suspension should be lif ted should be considered by the Appeal Board, subject to possible subsequent discretiona ry review by the Commission.
t SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 8 of 15 T ABLE 2 91.10-1 (Cont inued )
Date Event June 30, 1977 SAPL/Audubon petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit, for review of the EPA Administrator's decision; recommending that the Administra tor's decision be vacated and set aside by the Court.
July 7,1977 The ASLB issued a Sspplemental Initial Decision to its Construction Permit decision of June 29, 1976 which solely addresses the issue of nine (9) additional alternate sites in southern New England not previously considered, as directed by the NRC in its Order of March 31, 1977. The Board concluded that in view of the institutional and legal obstacles and economic disadvantages associated with the nine additional sites, as well as the uncontroverted superiority of the Seabrook location f or system reliability, an individual comparison of Seabrook with one or more of these sites was unnecessary; that no alternative site where nuclear units exist or have been planned is obviously superior to Seabrook.
July 7, 1977 The Court denied the motion for stay of construction pending appeal filed June 16, 1977 by SAPL/Audubon as premature, but that it could be requested again after the NRC had acted to lift the suspension o.
construction at the site.
July 26,1977 The Appeal Board in a 2:1 decision, released its Memorandum and Order (ALAB-422) affirming the Licensing Board's authorization in issuing the Seabrook Construction Permits. The decision addressed essentially all the issues presented by the appeals from the Licensing Board's Initial Decision not previously covered in ALAB-366. Issues discussed in this decision included: Reactor Siting Criteria (population), Reactor Siting Criteria (seismic), Alternate Site Inquiry, Financial Qualificatica, Transmission Lines, Need for Power and miscellaneous issues.
July 26, 197 7 The Appeal Board in a 2:1 decision ( ALAB-423) lif ted the suspension of the Construction Permits, with full reinstatement to be effective August 1, 1977.
The stated bases for this decision were as follows:
O
t
' SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Fe brua ry, 1982 V]
/
Page 9 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1 (Continued )
Da te Event 1.
The EPA Administrator's June 17, 1977 decision overturning the EPA Regional Administrator's decision of November,1976 and explicitly approving a once-through cooling system for Sea broo k.
2.
The Licensing Board's July 7,1977 supplemental decision agreeing that the Seabrook site was obviously superior to alternate sites in New England.
3.
The Appeal Board's July 26, 1977 decision
( ALAB-422) which resolved, in PSNH's favor, all the remaining issues presented by appeals from the Licensing Board's Initial Decision which authorized the Construction Permits.
July 2 7,1977 NECNP asked the Court for a brief stay of
/N construction to provide time for submission of a
(_,)
detailed request for a substantial stay of construction, pending review by the Court of all remaining Seabrook issues.
July 28, 1977 The Court denied NECNP's July 27, 1977 request because the requisite irt parable damage was not demonstrated.
September 15, 1977 The NRC issued an Order addressing the Appeal Board's July 26 decisions, ALAB-422 and 423, which had (a) af firmed the Licensing Board's authorization of the Seabrook Construction Permits and (b) lif ted the suspension of the Construction Permits.
In the Order, the NRC designated which of the Appeal Board's holdings it would review.
Issues to be considered are: (a) financial qualifications of the Applicant and related matters, (b) whether it was proper for the Appeal Board to accord binding ef fect to findings of the EPA pursuant to Section 316(a) of the FWPCA with respect to the impacts of the once-through cooling system on the marine en vi ronment, (c) the assertions by NECNP that the Appeal Board distorted the meaning of hearing testimony and, thus, its rulings were in error and (d) whether the Appeal Board erred in according t)
presumptive validity to the July 17 ASLB decision in
(,,/
comparing the Seabrook site with possible alternative sites.
,_.y.
1 SB 1 & 2 R2 vision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 10 of 15 TABLE 2 91.10-1 (Continued)
Da t e Event Szptember 16, 1977 SAPL/Audubon petitioned the Court to review the EPA Administrator's decision of June 17 which reversed the EPA Regional Administrator's Initial Decision and approved once-through cooling for Seabrook.
The Court was requested to grant an immediate stay and to suspend the effectiveness of the Administrator's decision.
Oc tober 7,1977 In an Order, the Court denied SAPL/Audubon's September 16 request for an immediate stay of construction and suspension of the EPA Administrator's decision of June 10, 1977 (issued June 17,1977), on the basis that it had not had an opportunity to examine the issues, was unconvinced of resulting irreparable harm, and that the appeal would be briefed and argued at a November hearing.
November 30, 1977 The Board released its second Supplemental Initial Decision to its June 29, 1976 Initial Decision which authorized the issuance of Construction Permits f or Seabrook using once-through cooling and rejected the alternate closed-cycle cooling. In this latest supplement, the Board concluded that:
(a) the benefits of Seabrook with natural draf t cooling towers outweigh its costs, and (b) none of the proposed alternate sites is obviously superior to Seabrook, even if one ignores the f act that Seabrook is closer to completion.
January 6,1978 The NRC unanimously af firmed the Appeal Board's I
decision permitting resumption of construction at Sea brook.
The NRC's review involved two basic i
issues:
(1) PSNH's financial qualifications, and (2) the ef fect of the EPA's determinations concerning the aquatic impact of the cooling system. Two other issues also addressed were (1)
I alleged Appeal Board distortions of the record, and I
(2) presumptive validity of the Licensing Board's l
Supplemental Initial Decision. According to the NRC, this decision has resolved most of the issues within the NRC's jurisdiction.
1
4 SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 5-Page 11 of 15 V
TABLE 291.10-1 (Continued)
Date Event Fabrua ry 15, 1978 The Court released a Decree and Opinion vacating the EPA Administrator's decision and ordering a remand for the limited purpose of allowing the Administrator to determine whether a hearing was necessary at which cross-examination would be available.
March 2,1978 PSNH filed a motion with the Court of Appeals for a stay of mandate.
The Court was advised that PSNH intends to apply to the U.S. Supreme Court by petition for a review on writ of certiorari of the Court of Appeals decision. The Court of Appeals was also requested to stay its mandate for 30 days or until further order of the Court and until an order of the U.S. Supreme Court on PSNH's petition.
March 16,1978 Tne Atomic Safety and Lice nsing Appeal Board heard oral argument by the parties on the appeals from the two supplemental Initial Decisions of the Licensing 7-ss
( )
Board and on the motions by the intervenors to suspend the Construction Permits.
April 4, 1978 SAPL/Audubon petitioned the Board to declare the Construction Permits invalid, to suspend or to grant an immediate stay on the grounds that the Town of Seabrook would suffer irreparable harm to its f resh water supply.
April 13,1978 In response to the Court 's February 15, 1978 mandate to the EPA Administrator, PSNH filed a motion to have the Court either grant a rehearing or to recall its mandate and vacate the decision on the basis that the major factual premise of the Court's decision was in error. PSNH petitioned the U.S.
Supreme Court to grant a writ of certiorari to review the February 15, 1978 judgment and opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit which overturned the EPA Administrator's decision on the once-through cooling system for Seabrook, and to vacate and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration.
V
t SB 1 & 2 R vision 1 ER-OLS Fe b rua ry, 1982 Page 12 of 15 T ABLE 2 91.10-1
( Continued )
Da t e Event April 28,1978 The Board released its decision ( ALAB-471) reversing the Licensing Board's Initial Decisions and remanded the cause to the Licensing Board for further proceedings consistent with the Appeal Board's opinion. The Construction Permits were allowed to remain in full force and effect pending the outcome of the further proceedings, unless the NRC should order otherwise.
May 3, 1978 SAPL/Audubon petitioned the Court for revie. vf the Appeal Board's April 28, 1978 Order and Decision (ALAB-471), which declined to suspend the Construction Permits while reversing the Licensing Board's two Supplemental Initial Decisions.
May 10, 1978 PSNH petitioned the NRC for a review of that portion of the Appeal Board's April 28, 1978 decision (ALAE-4 71) which reversed and remanded the Licensing Board's two Supplementary Initial Decisions.
May 19, 1978 The Court, in a Memorandum and Order, denied the SAPL/Audubon motion for a stay of the decision authorizing construction, and stated its willingness to await whatever guidance the full Commission choores to of fer before releasing its decision.
May 31, 1978 The NRC issued an Order partially granting the Staf f 's May 15 petition and denying the petitions by the other parties. The parties were asked to address:
(1) whether the southern New England site issue should be terminated, and (2) whether the Construction Permits should be suspended while the EPA was re-examining the Seabrook cooling system, or during the pendency of the cooling tower remand, or during the remand on the southern New England sites issue if the issue is not t e rmina t ed.
O
4 i
SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS February, 1982 Page 13 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1 (Continued)
Date Event June 26, 1978 The EPA reopened hearings in Manchester, New Hampshire on Seabrook Station discharge permit as directed by the First Circuit Court.
June 26,1978 The NRC held an af ternood hearing in Manchester, New Hampshire on ALAB-4 71.
June 30,1978 The NRC, in a 2:1 vote, ordered the Construction Permits suspended by July 21, 1978.
July 6,1978 EPA hearings closed.
July 10, 1978 PSNH filed a motion with the NRC Commissioners to stay suspension of construction, due to the conclusion of the EPA hearings and indications of a prompt decision. The motion was denied af ter a hearing on July 14, 1978.
( ; July 19, 1978 The State of New Hampshire and two construction unions filed suit in Washington, D.C. District Court to stop the NRC from enforcing its suspension of construction at Seabrook.
July 21, 1978 Construction at Seabrook was halted for the second time af ter the Court refused to enjoin the NRC from halting construction stating that the District Courc did not have jurisdiction in this case.
j August 4, 1978 The EPA Administrator re-af firmed his earlier decision that the proposed cooling system for Seabrook Station complies with the Clean Wa*.er Act.
PSNH immediately filed with the NRC a motion to lift the suspension of construction, and arguments were scheduled for August 9, 1978.
August 10, 1978-The NRC, in a 4:0 vote, reinstated the Construction Permits for Seabrook effective immediately.
l l
i O
v
i SB 1 & 2 Revision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 Page 14 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1
( Continued )
Da t e Event August 22, 1978 The First Circuit Court of Appeals upheld several major NRC decisions regarding Seabrook Station, eliminating most legal questions relative to the licensing process. An appeal of the recent EPA decision and the issue of southern New England sites remain as the only major issues still outstanding.
September 7,1978 The Appeal Board denied a request f rom SAPL/Audubon Society to expand the review of the alternative sites for a nuclear plant with cooling towers. The Appeal Board denial (ALAB 495 & 499) of three additional northern New England sites was based upon the failure of the intervenors to show cause why the scope of the current investigation should be ex pa nd ed.
September 20, 1978 The NRC, in a 3:1 vote, declined to review an ALAB order continuing the alternative sites study for the Seabrook plant with cooling towers.
g Oc tober 2,1978 The U.S. Supreme Court denied a PSNH petition to review the February 15, 1978 decision by the U.S.
Court of Appeals of the First Ci rc ui t, which vacated and remanded the EPA Administrations decision on once-through cooling.
December 11, 1978 The U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal from the First Ci rcui t Cou rt of Appeals therefore upholding the NRC ordering of a dif ferent route for some of the proposed transmission lines from the Seabrook plant.
December 21, 1978 The Appeal Board in Memorandum and Order (ALAB 513) denied a motion to reopen the record on PSNH's financial qualifications.
May 2,1979 The First Circuit Court of Appeals, in a unanimous decision, upheld all aspects of the EPA Administrator's decision approving the proposed cooling water system for Seabrook Station.
O
-.--. _ = -
SB 1 & 2 Ravision 1 ER-OLS Februa ry, 1982 i
e Page 15 of 15 TABLE 291.10-1
( Continued )
Da t e Event May 14,1979 The Appeal Board suspended further consideration of the alternative site issue for Seabrook Station, stating the issue is now " wholly academic" because of the May 2 decision of the rirst Ci rcui t Cou rt.
May 30,1979 The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed a petition by the SAPL/Audubon which questioned whether the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's inquiry and finding on possible alternative sites f or Seabrook was far ranging enough to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). In its order, the Court said, "the NEPA requirement of studying alternatives may not be turned into a game to be played by persona who -- for whatever reasons and with whatever depth of conviction -- are chiefly interested in scuttling a particular project".
O J
O 1
___ ___