ML20041E728

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Audit Supporting Hazleton Labs America,Inc as Provider of Radiological Sample Analysis Svc
ML20041E728
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  
Issue date: 12/09/1981
From: Fay C
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER CO.
To: James Keppler, Oestmann M
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
NUDOCS 8203110287
Download: ML20041E728 (37)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:PRINCIPAL STAFF aIn I irsIs lyo_ I ?- n/n '( A/D h.,3 l iEt,PI ; f f \\ O Wisconsin Electnc ma comr ami 231 W. dlCHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 g/ EPW File D J+ y December 9, 1981 a) V Mr. J. G. Keppler, Regional Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement, 9 RECEIVED Region III ~ U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 'p MARj 019826 I 799 Roosevelt Road ' Name Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 AmermengeYr M Attention: Ms. M. J. Gestmann f

Dear Mr. Keppler and Ms. Oestmann:

ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS CONTRACTOR AUDIT POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT The enclosed audit report is provided to you in response to Ms. M. J. Oestmann's request to Mr. J. Jacovitch of our Nuclear Engineering Section. This audit of the Environmental Science Division of Hazleton Laboratories America Incorporated was performed by our Quality Assurance personnel on October 8-9, 1980. If there are any questions, please contact us. Very truly your 9 0' s C. W. Fay, Director Nuclear Power Department Enclosure Copy (wo/ enc.) to NRC Resident Inspector hl (- 8203110287 811209 DEC,i 1 gggh PDR ADOCK 05000266 P PDR

WISCONSIN Electnc ma coursur 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX 2046. MILWAUKEE, WI 53201 i QA-80-691 October 13, 1980 Mr. Howard J. Delink Manager, Quality Assurance Environmental Sciences Division (Northbrook) HAZLETON LABORATORIES M1 ERICA INC. 1500 Frontage Road Northbrook, IL 60062 (

Dear IIoward:

POINT BEACH RADIOLOGICAL SAMPLE NIALYSIS QA AUDIT / QUALITY PROGRAM SURVEY OCTOBER 8-9, 1980 Your established and implemented quality system is considered satisfactory to meet the reruirements of ANSI N45.2 for providing radiological samplo analysis service for Point Deach Nuclear Plant. The quality program survey also approves your program for the remaining environmental services which your company offers. These evaluations are based upon review of your Quality Assurance Program Manual and the visit to your facility on the subject date by myself and D. Robinson. As requested, a copy of the completed audit checklist ( is attached. Thank you and the other Hazleton Environmental Sciences Divicion personnel for your assistance during our visit. Very truly yours, a . R. Dunham Project Engineer Quality Assurance Attachment DRD/ch Blind copies to C. N. Peters (w/o attachment) File 21.6 Hazleton

~ Appendix A N.Al-2 A ~ N,f 1 a6e 1 / TPAUSMIT_"AL OF SUPPLIER EVALUATIC:l P25ULTS FOR I.V: LEAR II!DUSTRY ~ To: C#SE D1ta Center Date: Cctelie'<- 10 /0,4 o Aerojet Liquid Rocket Cc.pany P. O. Box 33222 Members ' Code No. 25d Sacramento, California 95813 Dept. 8210: Bldg. 2022 Gosys'cc.s me.htl Scirace biSL e C*t {NCr Yt br00 N\\ Supplier Name: l-ka s le* + e n Ln bern4-ce; e _5 A mes' <*n %C Address: 1500 Fecid ac e' D. City & State: klockbt been k 1L Zip Code: (f OO d31 (1) Supplier is considered: Small Eusiness _44" Iarge Business 0.UALITY COI; TROL SYSTE:t/t'.3.I:UFACTU3II G CAPABILI'IT:

2) Ihte of en-sito survey:/ 8 'l[9 D Updated based on perfort ance:

Process No. Lotter(s) (5) Product Group (d) System level (3)- (4)A Designation Code Ictter 436 1 Cceplex b 2 Simple SFECIAL !aI;UFACTURIIG OR II:3FECTION FP.CCESS CAPABILITY: (7) Plte of cn-site survey: Updated based os perfor=ance: Specification No. Process !!o. Category (Type or Class) { (8) (9) (lo) (11) All above results to be ceded in for.st cf the CASE Register Y Add Capabilities Listed Other: F;le 24-6 Harleton %:..-QAJNC0

P N.1A-2 Appendix C ~ CASE - NUCLEAR SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION SUPPLIER DATA: SURVEY DATA: Dwa,'04M"8'4' DATES: Og. pgy hp',. Q -Cl \\ (j @ h N AME

  • I'#W E I', +'# #I"w c"n'iY d' # r$ M.!c,cu Eat lf i

H n rI. on e-a e es &> FACILITY ADDRESS: gggp peg g g @[, SURVEY BY: g*qq g l g 6fe*chre'(_ CITY & STATE: N g 7-{-.h b e,yd IL STATED SYSTEM LEVEL: lO I* [k 80 Mff b ZIP CODE: /g()[] y 2 EVALUATED SYSTEM LEVEL: A Qg -- M g, E PHONE NO: q g 7,, gg,.,j} g y g g OA SYSTEM MEETS REOTS: pg3y jij gg, Z FACILITY INFORMATION: PRINCIPAL PRODUCT OR GERVICE: I^ d fod me+ (t 3 C d n c c' S P ('Vt'< F 3 ( WORK DISTRIBUTION: NON-NUCLEAR 90 % IO NUCLEAR CIVIL ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL _ % 1&C % Nb UTILITIES b % GOVERNMENT l.9 % OTHER CODE STAMPS AND AUTHORIZATIONS: VI e d O ( NO OF INSPECTORS (1) O NO OF PRODUCTION WORKERS (P) /88 ' /d RATIO (t/P) d b5sd L MN'[ ) TOTAL NO OF PERSONNEL IN QUALITY ASSURANCE (INSPECTORS INCLUDED) I TOTAL NO OF PERSONNEL AT FACILITY INCLUDING QA 10d-lZC MEY SUPPLIER PERSONNEL: R. M..bena Il 3 M s in.t.Dlce<3c e SENIOR COMPANY OFFICIAL: N I-F 4 < M(retacle#f d <><< V kSC t/f 4 et t t' SENIOR QA DEPT OFFICIAL: OTHER KEY COMPANY PERSONNEL: b'b-do b '1FT -.D ? foc NW /('a/ c len A* r. r K. Faa s .bkeder Te.wsfeta \\ Se ' e.a e s L. Ewc hart ,h; ee4:e karf:e_ Se:caces L. heYrle cb trech t be.sasYr s/ L SURVEY TEAM INFORMATION: NAME TITLE DISCIPLINE ,f _ f,} t h,f. f,g, r, l yM,,,, TEM WDW f Q g g. TEAM MEMBER: , h, { h ('i t<S r) K deh O.' n e-(y OM C., if-t REV. 0 2/15/14 SHEET __1_.OF

SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION EVALUATION

SUMMARY

SECT LEVEL & ADEQUACY SYSTEM ELEMENT NO B N COMMENTS A General / 1 Organsrevion / 2 Ouality Assurance Prageam j 3 Design Controt / 4 Procurement Documant Control / 5 f ratructions. Procedum and Dramngs / 6 Document Contros y 7 Control of Pureased Matenal. Equipment and Som / 8 Identification and Control of Matenets. Parts and Components / 9 Control of Spectat Proresses / 10 inspection 77 11 Test Control V 12 Cahbration of Measumt and Test Equeoment / 13 Handling. Storme. Sh'DDit's and Preervation / 14 Inspection. Test and Operating Status / IS Nonconforming Matenal. Pads or Components y 16 Correct w Action l/ 17 Ouality Assurance Records 4/ 19 Audits / 19 Other l

SUMMARY

COMMENTS OF EVALVATOR: T S AC 'O N &O '5 IR W O3 d A. 8 1( l M f kF wF A O 61 / L4w.d <>A cy:c-> c,m be A n.se su m t., e., e. 3c L.4 m m m t, c c4 % kPc A E L (t KNn Y 10No E,'r t40S Pe*'r $^?.t k$se derN Ye s's uO s<osch :.wA;n" %4im (?, L A,~. i n xtv. A.un i i l / KEY TO SPECIFICATION LEVEL: / f_~k/ 4./, c hw G - AEC 10 CFR 50 (B) ~ EVALUATOR'S SidNA*URE AND DATE N - ANSI N45.2 2 OF 2b SHEET

j l SECTION A - GENERAL SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSUR ANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION k k'* OF(' Cr M 6' b Cn roer

1. What is the basis for the Suppher's OA Progrem?.

,JrIN#

  • R et r8 r (Y* me 5

In Acre. $ o,u e.a M

  • ". iWe i l(

O A k(c4%#

2. Is program basis a wntten Company policy? V#5 M Ab e ed f.3 k.?tq lu I

(viuv euk Status *

3. Basic OA Program Documents (Manuels)

Titte Revt Date 4 5 f) Q tit)A ( AhC 46 4 PS . kJ hS$r tOscP cndC ft w & dn. (

b. Design
c. Procurerrent
d. Fabncation
e. Construction
f. Inspection g Testing h Auditing
6. Are lower tier implernenting menvals in use? (if yes. list.)

Osa frQ-s Cohrel freeeehwes Westtht W6L Cetc k i.,nek o 100 a lan s a [A:r. AuN. r ' Aaedic hi ce I.d4 e Wh4cv iWenta decleer ' k Tmedn ed T E AC.h J Ek btL C; n\\ \\ a6 - % p er k:(_ th !) l e ch rf(* ,ard t r( ? a f n' A fikp c_ a v*d. ~ (4 b d dr* r, 'trb(* d^ be C k(>tbNN

7. Has any portion of the work of establishing and enscuting the QA Program been degted to others? (if yes. describe.)

v\\ O

  1. CL 4 End sec$lo ' S ef

C ##d 5 #" "" d' # C '3a The overall govemir9 and policy setting QA Manual and Progrwn.

  • 4.

Are QA Program documents up to dote?

  • i Are QA Program documents accroved by renconsible personne4?

3 26 n- ....e,

t SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEQUACY OA PROGR AM STATEMENT ITEM C M ENU EVALUATION CRITERIA . LOCATION g y 1.0 ORGAP!2.ATIOli 2! V i.5 Iou b 1(d t/ .1 Respcosible for establistment of U 626910 l / program. (1 1/1 6) rue. 1 /1-6) 0S

    • 00 u

l M 4 d G hA- 04A fpJkutt I(CC 1((pg h 3 Reepmib111ty ntatand by sup. plier for GA program even whea ,f the work of establishing or V g g g exeenting the GA program La dele. f gated tu other organisaticna. (12/17) k .h Authority ami duttee of persons g gg ( / and organteations performing SA functions clearly established and delineated in writing. (13/31,2,3) .) Authority and organisational freedon j QOP i O \\ p.2 cf such gernons and organisatto.a sufficient a. h identify probleas; f I b. To initiata, roccessed, or / provide solutiones c. To verify taplementation of / solutions (1.k/3 4); amt 4 h control further procesetas, s delivery, or installation of a l j nonconfo;aing staa, deficiency or unsettefactory condition until proper disposition has occurred. ( /3 4) \\I l l .6 Managenest measures provide that the latividual or group respan* h@ @k o 7 afble for checktru, muittias, T T insrection or otherwise verify 1ag V that an activity has been cor. rectively terformed is intapendant of the individual or group dirwetly responsible for performing l the efecific activity. (15/37) 1 ra% LA & A~s % 06 9 a.ae~ O M 's Awk k Ma+ I:eo & ndwed owb ru ks. c,n % ~,( no " +%c o s SHEET I OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE F SYSTEM EVALUATION QA PROGRAM STATEMENT ggy EVALU ATION CRITERIA t.OCATION B N 2.0 SJALITY ASSURANC2 PIOCRAst [hl[ g,y/:, /ggf b .1 oup,ne, shau.. bu a. hea l I M'~,"2T cC;'E' OPP 20z-v f 7OI .2 Domumentatim of GA progrues eW be by, y,. Olqec.Y.v *5 b f c a. Writtaa poltelee; b N e* **Y" OS OM L YdM C 4 {O OfRC (C5 3d MP b. Prweduno! or c. lis truc tions. (2 2/ = ) 3 Plans for this prugram aball be Shdy k.A Cf (

  • %C'e's"'8.'f')

&ck cdcreed .b Identify items or servies to be covered by the GA pregree. (2 3/2 5) 20 Identify ma y r organisatt es j rurti 1pettrg in yngram sad their desicated functions. (2 3/2 k) 0 N3 .6 4A prwrea provides control over activitit a effecting the quality of the identifled Itaas or f servi-*e to the extent ecmstatant with tac tr importance to eefety, reliability and perforunnee. gg g2 (2-4/2-6, 7, 0) 7 Activities affecting quality oball be accomplisted eder eutt. / etly centrolled cor:11tions. @f 20 1 Contrclied eend1tions include: a. Use of a Tropriate equipment; b. Buttable enviromeental eced1= t tions for seeceipliabing the / activity, is, adequate clean. liness; and e. A.sr.u ence that prerequiettee for j the given activity have been s et t s fied. (25,6/211,12) Y .6 Frogram shall take into aceoat the g g f %g { need fr* esocials / a. Controls; i b. Frecesses; e. '! Wet Equipmeat3 4. Teolo; and Stilla to attain required I e. guality. (2-7/2 13J N,/ 1 fN rit d t iV e' (NGCS t /C# 0N C'O h [ U88ud ( 3 0 C k, /". r f t' 3 3 Mc tm QL Ot C rn.o bW< Vtl *. .& Cs' 14 $m,Y 0C.n tc & )cer fo'oseIdes 5 c.4, l'OO kCS f*I' >t'N ,? t g S M '# A M \\<sks h $ IV CCc' d r f 3 $wba s.'tw. Dirc.ek rf C @/tlAicdv#-'dbi hM SHEET OF

a 2 SECTION 4 SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVAL.UATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY OA PROGRAM STATEMENT ITEM CouMENTS F VALUATION CRITERIA LOC ATIO* 8 0 N 1.0 ORGANCATIon (Conto) 7 The preon or cruentastice respomelble l!$. for defining the ers11 effeettvenees bN of the GA progreat l a. D all be dentansted; epa ptua a.~ ko no see ketcr\\ dat:es al b. Shall be irder= Meat h the NOid#d 9 40 f fd'k FC / VM e* 6 Y ? preneuree of pNuctions e. hall beve direct aceees to avernnetble mannaement et a , [ ( level where appnnriete action i:N can te, requiredj and d. Shall swport regularly on the effeettvenees of the pregsrem. .. f Y in ( - /3-5) asesion 1.o suanary e - sta t)plth ek droy.7ah;e., h.$, { q Jhpk fpc q&hph u -\\f( (DO C t h (k () d' A( ( fif f st ( & yygq g Q f ( 4 Ak$$ C' $ ( D f_ l

  • G A k

$54EETd OF

SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION I LEVEL & ADEOUACY OA PAOG A AM STATEMENT ggry EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N 2.0 UJALTff ASSUIWICE F50348 (Oostd) 9 Prosrea shal.1 tame into acece t Qd@ l00 \\

  • f the need for verificatico of TM ity by ineswetica and test.

(a.7/210 .10 Prterna shall provide for Ladoctri-pg g T E'c b M R I S N i e nation and treining cf Imrecanal Eb hbO \\ b dO4 CA N '1l Vtb ty ces to see e outtable proficiency to achieved and $ Mattod 2 5 M SIC, krai[tefJ. A. Y O f d.*t e i ominteired. (2-8/2 10) ( .11 Supplier shall reg @rly review the A f {g( [ status ami miequacy of his entire GA progena. (2 9/21b) gCg gg .12 Management of organisatices partic1= 3 pating in the GA progree shall N i f j / review statue and adequacy of that (O 3 part of GA program wtitch they ass executing. (210/214) Section 2.0 (munary C e nta: O h <>g gn. g., Mqf)cggg g Q d 4fo;g,3,, pofg, ff,g O dggltsis7u! Ol'< Schht[> - Nje $1,r'r of?seth. lAt t b e rk $t h,s.;cc kdg r'st a./ kr re < n,e h h]t.t & h e*r ( (?f4 <>tt,1? it'eq he$< r v 0cYrb]2.'.a,4bn$3lrl f ?ab st i. ot e in t e r) '(* i a O & t(M pr [e'bkC et G '. A 85-AT f18 03 CC t= TS "n(vrtaC.& kr's 00th. I I 10 kI.zahn M.:,u? fr<n & A.*er$a '24audcNidaAhd buebt.d ~ dos /mif [4,tst,,ff k [dt',Yleff Ie [2Y- %!"7 9 4 V V vun:o 4e Lenkt., Fs., el-;e, oo n u. ceA L Ae %c nhy Mcem A. IM:'bc"(, no b tge " ta N h (c u p s SHEET 1 OF 26

SECTION ) SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY UEM OA PROGR AM STATEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N I 30 EESIQlt CCWrBOL OAP 3ol, S w J y P laei pgar ed .1 M. ume e u be est. bushed to osun aat appueous.mified soz soy' 7,)n k Sc,Ie design requirementa, such as design ) bases, regulatory requirveents, [M y 4 codes and standards an correctly transletse into spece, drawings, / procedures and instructions. (3-1/b1) .2 Messuno shall include provisions to assun that appropriata quality g" standards are opcified and j \\' included in design doctmenta. I (3-2/b2) I .) Charges or deviaticca from design requirment4 nr quality stamtariis aball te identified, documented j and contrs11ed; (3-2/b3) .h Measures shall be establiebed for selection and review for euttability of appliention of materiale, parts, equipsent and processes that an essential to tae estety-related I fWettone of the p oduct. / (3-3/b6) l f 3 Measures aball be established for the ( identification and cer. trol of design interfaces and for cooriipatica enorw participating design organi. j zettene. (3 l./b7J } qnp4o2Ju Prome ted .6 Me. urve saan snelues tae est.b. lieh;nent of procedurve escas participatira design organisaticas {A for review, opproval, release, y distribution ard revision of documenta involvira desten interfaces. l (3-5/ M ) 7 Desto ecetrel measures shall provide for vertrying or checking adequacy of design auch as performance of / desi s review, by the use of alternate or simplif ted calculational metuds, or ty per*cruance of a euttable testin6 program. (3-6/b-9 ) _ 8 The verifying t r checking proceso shall be perfermed by indivi$uale or grwie other than those who per- ) fortra original design, but may be fr a the same crganisation. ( 3-7/b10) y kW?__ RMAlwC L OreM kt ec ,a$ (' {w.k em{i rk Yec[w;(q { Sy>cM; rS; w l l -- R.. %

SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION gygg OA PROGRAM STATEMENT LEVEL & ADEQUACY EVALUATION CRITERI A LOCATION B N 30 DI:lIGN CCwilCL (Contd) 9 it.e responettle design organisatica CA 30I shall identify the particular y^ n riftention mathoda ut111aed. </ ( = /4 12) .10 Whore a teet pragrum to used to wrify the adequacy of specific s.f' N OO { a p design featun in lieu of other vertrying or et.ecking process, it shall include euttable gaalification / tastirg of a prototype tatt sueler the cost adve rse design ccealitions. (3-0/4-17, 18) I' 31 Design c'etrest measures shall be A applied to 1tras such as the follow. I Reactor gdiyeles analyses; a. b. Streeo, thereal, hydrau.11e and eacident analyseej e. c.erpntibility of materiale; d. Accese tt111ty fer in-service inspe ctical l e. Accessibility for in-seretee maintenance and repatr; and i f. De11nention of acceptance criteria rcr insgeettuna and taste. (3-?/k-5) .12 Di sign et.anges, ineltating field / ebanges, aball te subject to the i design c.ntrol measuree ecumen-ourate with those applied to the original design an1 te approved by the organitation that perforund the original design unless the purchaser designates another reopensible ortacitation. (3-10/k-21,22,23) Seetion 3 0 Sumary Canannts, N SHEET OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY OA PROGRAM STATEMENT f VALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N k.O PmCt DENT IKItMEFT CGFIEL P p () /}o \\ .1

  • - un.. e be..t.bu ard to assure that app!! cable regulatory requirementa, design besee and othe r requirements which ar9 rsecessary to assure adequate quality are euttably incluled or referemmed in the documenta fer procurement of ti e auf services, et= tar

/ purettased by the seller or by ita subecatrac tore. (b 1/5-1) {hg 4 ( - ( 3 y (3 cs h .2 Procurement doewents shall include provtelms for the folleving, as qfg;. applicable: p clQ k [ g ho,' 4 y, a. Identiftentim of quality assurance requirements and the elewnia of the progrum ! / applicable to tM ttans or services precured. b. Drewiras, specificaticms, codes Q{ arat industrial standards with applicable revietcn data, test fy,' kf arms insteetico mquirementa, and stecial instructions erst [ requirements, such as for designing, fabrication, cleaning, erecting, reckaging, h=aditas, ehltpir.g, armi, if applicable, extended storage in the fieldt ard fcr tes t equipment.. c. Proeletons for access to the M* b ple.nt facilities and recorde for Qf 1/ souree ins p ction and audit. d. ftecerts to be prelated, maintained, I outzsitted or made avut.lable for 1/ re viev - I M3 8 ~ N PCs 'O S e. In.struction on rueerd retantica y and disposition. 1 f. Provf etas for exter Sing applicable requirements of procurement docue f mente to Icwer tier subecotractors aid supp11ere includ!.ng sellers and buyers access to facilities y and recerce. ( - /5-4, 5. 6, T, 8) e,cg,f,,;Ig g W h, jg,$d fdhC%C,t .) Sellare procurement docusenta shall l requiry contreeters or subecentractore gg,[,1 ~ to prcelde a quality assurance j. L3 g M M,2 V,-r h,,g f, g e progrum ccmeletent with pertinent &r 4 provisions of the ( ABC/MS.2) MM Jewc f f }d '.8"M ' l c rite ria. (k4/5-3) 6 1 1 Section b.0 Saemary C e nta tM, 8 COfe'1 J C'( beli r O 2C o e* { r] A cr,p o' ( fyt< & ~ ytM f 3 He ' Q_ P VC 'C 1 SHEET OF 1

e SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL 8. ADEOUACY OA PROGRAM STATEMENT STEM FVALUATION CRITERI A LOCATION 8 N 5**

    • M M * "'" ' **

AhSO a0M%GL QAh6C 0ec.4;On .1 Activities affectir.g quality shall b 2 h g[ dgdk;e te prescrited by doeveented taatsue=. tions, procedurve or drewtage. (51/61) .2 Activittee shall to acccupliebe4 in accordance with t&see inst.ructiams, g/ procedurve or dravirge. ($.1/61) 3 Instructions, procedures or drewtage shall include apprvprista quantita. tive or qualitative acceptance f criteria for detarmining that k impurtant activittee have been accruplished. (54/64) Ta ckt M e n) D er>c G Mart rJo l C ctr Section 5 0 3tasmary c<ur- .a SLL,(>fAnc m~ J w on l r I l SHEET b OF 2b

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION CA PROGRAM STATEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION B N 6.0 DoctME2ff CGPfROL nAf vo t .1 Measures shall k established to cetrol the tes-of documenta, such as instructions, procedune, aat drawings, includtr4 chaases thereto, which pneeribe all actt-vittee affecting quality. (61/71) .2 Mrasuno ehall aseure that documesta, qgg #f. O { incluitng chanave, are nviewed for a adet.acy and approved for plance by / authorised peroomel and an distri-buted to and used at the locatta where tte prescribed activity to pe rformed. (6-2/7-2) hf hl[ { (C(el.%4 C(Jasid t (f .) Ct.an,;ee to deements shall k reviewed g and approved by the emme organisations ,h that p rformed the original review 4< and approval unless the buyer author = d (tJl(QQ Mcve t* C' e n) DT - p((SNb y .b 1he reviewird organisatime shall 6H 3 information. (./7-k) I p g Mb have access to pertinent backgrtmand 5 Docternt control measune shall provide fort a. Identification of individuals h or organisatione neponsible for preparing, revievng, approving [3%!S,f arbl issuing documenta ani Y I revisions thereto. (./7-7) T: b. Establishing current and upiat=4 dietribution lista. (=/7 11) l(h h 3 j // ( Section 6.0 saanry Ccmementa ke CV M<tMcb re86 3 faswer fRika\\ N w bhi c1:eA %ee Loa: nat <uhers 4hos BlA hwe id:<ed ) mv d aq o A:Ve(eE Cvm #re.m but<ek Los e A: br+ u SHEET OF

4 SECTION SUPPLtER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY ITEM OA PAOGRAM STATEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N 70 camel. CF PWCRMMC MMIAL, @f 701 702 3 .1 Measures shall to established to moeum that purcha.e4.atarial,. quip. Tc 3 ment, and services, whether purchased j directly or th:trud contractors v and subcontractore, conform to the procunnent docusents. (7 1/8-1) .2 The measures shall include provisions, [ as appropriata for: e 970 t a. Source eva.luatima and salmetton. b. Objective evidence of quality / fumiebed by h contractor or subcontractor. @9 70 g c. Lupection at the ccatractor or / subcentractor source. d. Examirattor of products upon / delivery. (7-2/8-2) .) Docuerntasy evidence that material ami equiltient conform to the procun. ment **guirements shall be available j at the suppliers facility prior to use of such antarial and equ13 ment. (7 3/8-6) .k Documentary evidence shall be retained by the supplier auf. ficient to identify the spect. fic requirement 4 such as codes, e stan!arde, or specifications, /, met by the pirebased material nad equipsent as required by procurse ment ductasenta.(7-4/8-7) Where neit precluded by other AD (' {g Q ([{CL h requirveents, such docussatary h g' g y ggyg) ( ( Q/ evidence may take the form of written certifications of ( confomance which identify the requirementa met by the itaan,

A

^ provtdea erano are available to verify the validity of such certificatione. (. /8-6) .6 The effe:tivenees of the control of quality by esntreetors and subecn. tractere shall te assessed by the hh d y seller or deetpee at intarvals consis tant with the importance, ccuplexity, ami quantity cf the product or services. (7-5/8 9) Seetica 7 0 8tsumary Ccumeenta GCCfD4A,1;@k2_ kf <<3 * (c!:5.h t tikP M4 t' C'c Al MW; O i n Wo hCr is (t a (t2 r yT $ ,uk r i r r r a f Y S.Ys & kn \\ d (E$Y (Y $ (YS (Of / i SHEET OF

SECTION F SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ACEQUACY OA PAOGR AM STATEMENT ITEM EVALUATION CRITERI A LOCATION 8 N _IDDCIyICATION AND CGrf7CL CF w e a~ w :e. h el@ o., 8.0 gh ghg g g go ) C .1 Messune shall to establiebed for the identificatten and control of materiale, parte, ami camposesta, j inc1witryt partially fabriented / as semblie s. (8-1/9-1) I .3 Hessume shall assure that identifica. tice of tJe ites la asiatained try heat mater, part raaber, serial Durater or other apprcpriate usano, either on the item or on records / i traceable to the ites, as required f throughout fabricatice, erectica, tr.stallation, and use of the Stee. (8-2/9-2, 3, 4, $) 3 Identifteetion and control measurse shall te designed to prevent the [ use of incorrect or defective mater = tal, parts, ard ccaponenta. K.- (8-3/9-2) Ni .4 Where identification marking to employed, tJe marking shall be clear, unanbiguous and inde11tle, and shall y be applied in auch a omaner as not v to affect the function of the ites. (./9 6) Markings shall be transferred to each l part of an ites when outdivided and shall not te obliterated or hidden by j aurface tres* ment er coatings mlese I other means of identification are s ubs tituted. (-/9-7) 3!$ y. .6 When cotes, standards, or specif1 SYli-l cations require traceability of , 3. nateriale, parte, or ccruponenta to specific inspection or test records, (/ the program shall te designed to b provide such traceability. (-/9-8) g Sectica 8.0 Suoman C<meente d /78L1 O 8 (711 fl s/8F3 k8 e' / l<1 NOC88$ Ort,u ll 9C e A vach i i l I -..... n 26

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEf' EVALUATION LEVEL & AOEQUACY QA PROGR AM STATEMENT EVALUATION CalTERIA LOCATION B N 9 LOFKM N g (dLd6 lA NUA .1 Measurge shall tm establiehad to / ('S I( NA'^j&{5C (dW Wp a..ur-that stee tal p= esses, includ-ing wloirut, heat-treatitut, cleaning, aru! normieetructive tssting are control-4s j 1ed arms acecnipliebed by qualified gd f(d o Op [Cd r>,{18 h {h personnel using qualified precedurse 1 in accort!ane-with applicable codes, k og @) f statutards, specifications, critaria i anS other eracial requirweesta. (9-1/10-1, 2) .2 Documentation shall be maintained for current.ly qualified perecumel, (- processee, er equitament in accordance / with the requirementa of pertinent crulee arut star:1erite. (-/10-3) p go( 'g gggh dC d pl[ 3 For eretal processes not ecrvered by existir.t codes er starutards, or

p; where item quality requiremente exceed the rvguiremente af established codse W:: v' or starviartis, the necessary qualifi-entlene of Jerennel, procedures, or equipment shall be defined. ( -/10-h) y Section 9 0 Bawmary Cameente I

l l l SHEETN OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE ) SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY OA PROGR AM STATEMENT ITEM ~ EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N f h005 %,-gk g ,t (G k .1 A procrum for sneseettan of act.nettgee i o 0 -* affecting quality shall to establien.d c s.TOS f

  • # *1 ami eseewted by or for the eeymetaattom sdd rT prfarming tas mettetty to verify eamfer.

mance with the dented test.ruettame, pretave, and drewinse for esemplisa. 1ng the activity. (101/114) 1 .2 a. Impection shall be performed by ind1e1duale ether than those one ,f perfereed the mettwity helag ins pe ted. (104/114) / b. Such perseme shall act report $t DS C, d O [O directly to the Mista 4-desd B Netd T fou ChjM { N gDy h im M'l(lm sup rvisor, stio am r.ep= stile [*' ".7)" '** '" 8" '** " IEE dO %. S 3 besto.st<me, er.auromata, or teste gg go(l (/J O 2 c,f materiale or prutweta processed ehan to perforure for each wort V oyerstata dere meesseary to escure quality. (10 3/M.4) .4 ff inelection of processed untertal or prestucta to 1speetham or disadena. tape, trdtreet est.rol by ami. to m., m eeein, mti ,. u t, y ami pe rsonne t shall be praeteed. (10.s/u.6) 5 Doth Ine .hau n.toet1cm etal pynceee mosttertag prv ided ot a omt,.1 to / inadequate without both. (105/117) .6 Eere a sangde is seed to sortfy acceptant 11ty of a grato of theme, the emepitaa prwdure shall be based y,pg en recognised standard praettees and I shall provide =1 equate Astifteattaa l for tim easple etse and salmetim procese. (. /11-5) 7 If sandatery inspection hold potata, j vbich require vitaessing or inspect. ind by the buyer's designated representative and beyced which work shall smt proceed without the / eeneent of its designated repre. eentative are required, the epecifte bold potata sba.11 be I indicated in appropriata docu. menta. (106/118) y j 1 section 10.0 sucriary comenta 1"O7 f' P_ 1t\\So 8 b o u 8 Cv'S t% et G kCV t' Fi df(7 %d,ucatie cor,1n %l+ m, A m+ ',I,w.M,' cews wc, &,- eceab he d ' i[M res/ i 0ereck lA m\\as,'c t h h a []erc N + m a n\\Aer N m mmthi f&tAnCb!rab ~ cc h m uA ;rde A;ceAb ch Aa% ~ sA & rn,~ s w e vlu ci u %d-o, \\ 7wdw n l ( 12c W0% O Sn Yl $l* Ye M' iil af 4 e

A i G' r CC M N, o

l 1A 96

s. SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION L VEL & ADEGUAW g7gy OA PROGR AM STATEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION D N U.0 T3tfT CGmot .1 A test progran chan be established <@ P 1) 0 l to assun that au testi.g required to demonetista tlat itame will perform sattefactorily in service to identif;ed and perferned in accoriance wit 24 vritten test procedures obich .Y incorporate the requirementa and acceptance limita ecstained in appl 1= cable design doctments. (u-1/121) c2 Test nquirementa and acceptance criteria shall be provided by the organization responettle for the Q {[Q ( design of the itse maar test, bj unless otherwise designated. ( - /12-3) 3 The test progrom shall incluse as , o 4, g appropriate procf testa prior to /V/t installation, prec'perettoral testa, g azzi olerational testa during nuclear M",k power plant cperation, of structures, I 6 dMdy3 .yet,., and components. (11-2/12-2) .h Test procedures shall incluSa ()g { provisteno for assuring that all Q v prerequisitee for the given teet have taen set, that adequata test instru-mentatica to available and used, and

  • he test la terformed toelar suitable envirorrental conditices.

(n-3/12-6, 5) g)g lld ( y 5 Test resulta shall to documented and r evaluated to assure that test require. 7 menta have been entisfied. ( (n h/12-6) Section 11.0 Dtsmary Cmata M% 1 P SHEET OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUAUTY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION y ^ ^ QA PF OGR AM STATEMENT EVALUAT.ON CRITERIA LOCATION B N g[ g { f(fceMd.T dd I<'S k 5 ij E' gO 3 12.0 C3m4CL CF MVA' RING AIC 'Mff f syIne:gr .1 Messun. aball te established to asema that tools, gagne, instruenta, and other measuring and testing devisee } used in activities affect!ag quality an properly crmtmiled, calibruted, / ami suljtsted at opcified portada to maintain accuracy withia ancessary limits. (12-1/13-1) _ .a:.9 .2 Inspection, measuring and test equip = iM mont shall te calibrated, adjusted and maintaine$ a.tainst certified f' equisment havira kamen valid rela. ( tionship to nationally neognised standards. ( = /13 2, 3) { 3 When inspect 10c, measuring and test i:fi equipment are founi to be out of calibration, an evaluatica shall be made an! docusented of the validity j of previous inspections or testa v neults and of the acceptability or itama pnviously inspected or tasted. ( - /13-7) 86 Inspection, measurint, or test equip = ment consistantly found to be out of / calibratica shall be repaired or nplaced. ( = /13-8) 5 neeords shall de maintained and equisament suitably marked to imilcate } W V' / calibration status. ( - /13 9) M, o,m&da A n<g ;% b)LA dscia, wvev e.ettem 12.0 s - ry c _.ta L:as.A Sch A;ll 4 :e a coo Ae v d.1 tJudew.Sc.:caces lah : was Ad <m.-:On \\ del : sec k-n LS sm;ol /6 94o3s/- soo-os-b ^ cal:hm % to-et-7s (e.: { l b cak lN Odf 16 - l ~1 '] 4 Pcerc, A e A \\cke 1 : ' r al:hm% n-4ce va A G w % <AeA Aon~3. Ae:w,\\ aok + d 3/sz-a /s o La(wd c kceA % ceblec+ ' G r4eeame +es t-E-2 s'- 2 0 dae s - 2. e. - e I det);brdicut

  • Calik..de eveo[ lmkc1 "

knec> eb Ca%At~ (e %;cacy recV) LIc ypcedL clo,e &c.y bch L" 7 be:no el Me~e <ee %% %& s -2 s - go % b d r4 3 s + c). n 5 7 g L5233 Co clcci C[u,r1 }:'es cales Icehed SHEET OF

s SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & AOEQUACY OA PROGRAM STATEMENT ITEM EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N 6Ag h g e,, g [ f 4g gg 3 h( 13 0 RAELDO, 3!OPAT, AED SEIFFIlO gjl inh biolchim\\a.<dclied("k .1 wures shalt be est.311sw to control the handling, storage, ship-j jitu 6 & g @[. gg-[O { /1 ping, cleanir4 and preservation of I d

  • d 4 material and equismant in accortance j

with work ami trapectica instructicas d(A to prevent damage or deterioration. / (131/14-1) q .2 When necessary for particular pro-ducta, special protective environ. meats, exh me inert gas etnes3here, specific noteture erstent levels, ,/ an1 temperatun levela shall be V f existance verified). (13-2/lb-38) ageelfled and provided (and their 3 Special handling tools acui equipment shall be inspected and tested in accordance with written procedures j and at specified times to verify j$ V that the tools and equipment are adequately unintained. ( /14 5) .b Special attention shall M steen to providing edequate instructions for marking and labelird fer packag! Jig, shipment, and storage of items. Marktrg aball be misquata to identify, maintain, and preserve the shilument, ineltslird indicativo of the presence 4.... of special environments or the need

  1. 3..9 for special centrol. (. /14-6, 7) g (

G Sectius 13 0 Summary Ccementa s SHEET $ OF 26

SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEQUACY OA PROGR AM STATEMENT EV ALU ATION CRITER'.' LOCATION COMMENTS ITEM 8 N 16.0 INSFECTION, Mr! AND (Y5 RAT 33 STATT [ /ke k hkJ c. Fic M freg(<2-5 eftilF*"I ope,a%g codMN s aJ 3 .... w 1 be -ta m. d to +0kba ace' fead i 3 "f-#',h e, 4 s it 11cate by use of martings such as e mp., ta.s, tasei., mund e.d. or other suitable maana, the status of ir.Sp*Ct1DDs and testa perf0M j e3gg } ygg 3 upon individual items. (1k-1/1$ 1, b) 2 Measures aball provide for the iden-tifleattun cf items which have entisfactorily gemoed rsquired insp.cti en atx1 testa, were amoss-san to preclude inadvertant bytes. / eins of such inspections and taste. I. (14-2/15-2,5) \\ I 3 wasures shall a.lso be established for tidicatinc the eserating status of items such as by tagging valvee / ard switches, to prwrent tandvertent operutt n. (lle-3/15-7) .4 wasu.res aball include procedarse for control of status indicators, including the authority for applica-p/ tico ar.d remeval of tags, martings, Aij:j f / latels and stanpm. ( - /15-6) g j i Secti-n 14.0 Suman Ceuumenta 4 L I I 1 l SHEET b 0F 26

I l I SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION L A QU C OA PpOGRAM STATEMENT EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION B N 15 0 lenIUC'JEFDIMDR) MATERIAL, PAJC5 OR g f )([O hd*gdl /(*,$gw f?CC(' J ( ef I W(*)~ CCMP0ftEC5 W(P8Ch0Vd .1 Waeurve shell be establiebed to I L O'#* EO 7 euntr.31 r ateriale, parts or c<uponenta (servleen or activities) whirt, da not conform to requirementa in order to prevent thstr inadvertent / una er inatallation. (15-1/16-1M, 8) .2 Measur-e aball include as apprepriate, precedurve for identification, docimen. tation, esgregatico, diepositica, sat notification to affected organisatime. (15-:/16-2, u) 3 Oneonforming items shall be reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired or y reworked in accortlance vita documented V proced ur* e. (15-3/16-3, 7) .4 he responetbility and authority for th.* dispoettion cf nonconforming itaue y shall be defined. ( /16 k) 5 Hepaired and reworked itene shall be reineFeted in seecrdance with applicable prxedures. (. /16-$) / .6 Measur-e which control further pro-cessing, delivery, er 1r.etallatim of a noneanforieir.g or defective itse per 11ng a deciolon on its dispeettion [/ shall te established eni maintained. (. /16 6) 1 '.7 Mrasures shall require docusentatie verify 1us the neceptability of non. f cor.forsf ng iter.e which beve the diernettion of "repatr* or "ues as L/ te." ( - /16-9) .8 A daeeriptino of the change, waiver, or deviation that has been accepted shall te doctanented to recori! the chwura an1 denita the es built con 11ston. (. /16 10) 9 Hranuryn shall te establiebed for deterutntr.g ncnet.nformance report. j i ability to lurchaser. (10CFR 50 33 v (e > > 't he C6/Uf \\l' section 15.o s-ry Co ent. 6 ed Mosco c4nmanf a Mw(t Le s ~ o = ee SHEET.S.1 OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION OA PROGRAM STATEMENT 'T EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 8 N l pA(> /Gol addrezer .d dea s 26- '"""2" .3 -- u,e..wii.estau dso...w that condittena adverse to quality such as failures, malfuncticas, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformance8 erg j prtuptly identified and corrweted. T v (16 1/17-1) 3 In the case of significant conditions adverse to quality, the measures shall aseww that the cause cf the condition is determined and corrective act14 taken to prwelude repetittaa. 1/ (16 4 /17-2) k (16A 3 The identification of etsnificant (,LLt

e. nditions adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrwettve action taken shall be V

doemented and reported to appresrtata levels of =anagement. (163/173) g[ h Section 16.0 &ammary Ccements r n 22 26 SHEET _ OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY OA PROGRAM STATEMENT ITEM EVALUATION CRITERI A LOCATION 8 N g 4 f 1 70 2,l7C3 3,.3 o,9cc a s e 4 ha ber d orf, " " ^ * ^ " ' " " .1 Sufficient recorde shall be main. [CcfL*$ f ra f3& r O N'I big tained to furntah evideaeo of acti-witles affectica quality. De recorde shall include at least (CN S the following: a Operating logo and the resulte / of reviews. A b. Inspections I l' c. Testa t d. m ite e. Monitoring of work performance. f Material analyses. g (17-1,2/18-1,2,3) .2 Records aball include closely related data such as qualifi-entiens of: l a. Personnel 1 b. Procedures V c. Equisment / (17-3/18-4) 3 Inspection and test records shall, I as a etnieue, identify: a. We inspector or data recorder. b. De type of observation. / c. %s results. d. The acceptability. e. Se action regarding deficiencies / poted. j f. De date of inspection or test. (17 k/18 99) W j DA (>ececA s Ckeekleds ' &4E /mieci 4 \\ ON th f PecAch 090b4 Sco 0903 2 O$ ecNn 40 \\9 Lh<o R D2' \\ IdEPCD l -M@M curer 23 ne26

SECTION SUPPLIER OUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & AOEOUACY OA PROGR AM STATEMENT gygg COMMENTS , EVALUATION CRITERIA LOCATION 9 N 17.o munr esuaa: seccas (conta) Gf 1702,170 V Sa* # (L L 11 l .b llecorde shall be identifiable y I and retrievable. (17.$/18-6) 5 N eorde aball be indeund, filed, and maintained in facilittee that provide euttable environment to miniatte dotartoration or damage (,/ and to pnvent lose. ( - /18-10) .6 Nquirementa for record stormee dz 110 ( transetttal, retention and maintenance shall s. Be established and doe m nted; b. Be constetent with applicable codes and standarda; I c. > cteststent with applicable g precurement doctamenta; and d. Dreignate assigned nepnn- ,j elbility. (176/187) v v 7 In gencial, rt eords whteh correctly identify the "as built" ecedition of ite-a in the plant should be maintained for the life of the W::: /[ [lant by or for the owner. - /18-a, 9) gr Section 17.o Stnnary Centa SHEET OF

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION LEVEL & ADEOUACY g7tu OA PROGRAM STATEMENT EVAL JATION CRITERIA LOCATION B N 18.0 AtEIT5 .1 Capretwnelve erstes of planned and periodic amitta eball be carried out to: a. Verify erspliance with all aspects of the GA program. 7 / (18-1/19-1, 5) b. Detaruine the effnettvenees of the program. (18 1/19 7, 10, 11) j 8 Ausita shouLS be conducted period. ( Scally or on a randcas, macheduled %g f QQ P ud5 bea ts, or both. It is desirable to conduct audits when one or more of the following conditione exist: Nii! When it le necessary to deter. a. mine the capability of a sub. contreeter's quality assurance ! / prterne prior to awarding of contract or purchase order. b. Wen, after award of contreet, sufficient time has elapsed for the implementation of the quality masurance program, and it le appropriate to detartine that the organisation is per. fcruing the functions as defined in the quality nesursace pro. f

y gram description, codes, standarde, at
1 other contract de cume nta.

4 ( c. W en signifteant changne aro A made in feetional arose of the quality maeurance prtgram, incluling significant rworgan. / 1:ations and procedure V revtetone. I d. When it la suspected that safety, perforinance, or rollabil. Sty of the itse to in jeopardy due to deficienefes armi nonemform. / .f ances in the quality amourance 3 program.

M:::

Wen a systraatic, independent e. asseossent cf prtgram effect. tveness or item quality or both v' le ceneidered neeeseary. f. M en it le considered necessary to verify implesmatation of gs required eurreet19e actions. b [ n r ( = /19-13 to 19) N \\'s wrev 25 nr 26

SECTION SUPPLIER QUALITY ASSURANCE SYSTEM EVALUATION F LEVEL & ADEQUACY GA PROGR AM STATEMENT WWW EVALUATION CRITE RIA LOCATION g g 18.0 A@lTJ (Conto) @ b>[,60f 3 Aw it. shall d performed in secordance with writtan precedures or ebeek11sta by appropriataly tratneo pereennel not beeing direct reopensibilities la the anne Ntra edited. (18-2/19-2) .6 An esattt plan abould be developed to pre. wide information about the (3 (17 f,f, audit. such as the f w ticeal ar.as to de.eit,d, the na.e. a.4 j ese tsus-nte cf those who will perform g the sta11t and the scheduling { erruraesenta, and the method of k repartirq firm!!nge ard reccomernf a. tions. ( - /19-12) _ f 5 a.semeldte =a = e entchan ta (AP (So b nacaseary action to correct the / deficiencies revealed by the audit. (. /19 !*) .6 Atatti resulta shall be documentad M () l, () and reviewed by management having T ~ ,/ responsibility in the area audited. (18-3/19-3) 7 Follow-up action, ineltaltag reeudit gg ( of de f tetent anas, shall be takes where trmlicatsd. (18-h/19 8,9) N I? ".$ ' S0 ~ ) if f*n/ $?le'.4C&G h t!

  • f J P

= Seetton 16.0 9mmeary Comeente .Dr)cs.w TE ledre l ~ Aten Gul4ob ' Tnsdeveh;mts hace r{o rex * $.vrlol 'receewe

  • M An. <, \\ hh \\ e riels:c;% n..h %4 cn,l;on<e.%. Op % c ) s -

kw A ces.,%.ce.de.m e,.a h.u, A (c.~ 4 ; e A Ato n P., alm 2 M N4 ec: d. s.loe % e neAre eop< &ns : c<n 3 - ! n - n,- t z, - I A o.s I 4 /M o3 -/4 clo sed da5lk (L c_\\<blN hrte. e ok cepcY Pre <!<) feb-nuklk,bt* A )5 6 ._ a r h p,, ...,s d : c t, d r.-s Nes 4 e b d' A h(2 AJo. so oon t-1 460 -I ~ 4,v.-% 4 A E S 72l9 4. \\ H hor;\\ (R h D l}rsom s es ef{r';vec$ Ak/g O cc<siderch acQ'phd&; clow oo-{- 4o be yeri-(;ed Wj ce na&& Or t&w b e c ') w d;ee keert key ven Or1 AFf W3-/4 de-C is A L( s % 5 Repk GreAn "P'D Mewe<1 ^T.

  • f'C* A A

a c a.s a. m <e s x ~s h;w s <cen c,. v, ducaef thdR Oeee.'t o~l n'l& {v cc..boch eb *lW NB 0 yecled [it .rew m4<.c L eld i Fese.- G 3dl4 A(2-oco i Freac&, ?vi2-7073 17t 10 n ?t2 SPEET OF

6d<o^*A, Sc:e sce buisin. 6Jo<4k bro &) & ele % 6 boca-betes A.waci ca, Lc. tJo4es c4.Sc.-sey 0<Aobe4 9 - I o,198 0 fu;ev de,rs by grosp Moclear Scmees L. Ikepar, C. g!a ca cot Pa>cekes w.-a d ges &A:< z. Receu; 5 (300k (uca ks sA c Arc,,o log of e<cy sam,ple cecc:<el, L codo.mer f

  1. J

( k(cklidt..(c..Sa'"r 1 5 # ko "1 # I ~ # ## ' C d d 5'"8 "0 4A f### i4 no+, cice s u e.? reasea, s, a -r,le - ku.eIe CcIlec4i<., 9e 6V.-s ( (24 /?rce4s checylc34 9< g eci clo i ci car =- c E,d ec. "6 b"N O" eg spe & a o...e le. a> d e c, vi W, e kc. ths;ys Lek.so<ngte 6 o. Ex. taasee ELiJ 42,-TI,-I@ ; EtMIOI 'een uJ.<w.aer %ata.de.sde, 00*.t'tibCav k0g $eth [pllta 1]eN.[cwgles L l 4'ler El.id-%, *'I'i,-ICC, E11)W i0 I t !acdo hv< k sis hk< k. SGeeis cc.cmLcadev.std cluechr accoracy g .bepl.'<cA e.A,nkju.s 0.5 col clusta, L<3's ik.mle na loye ew.g4 +0 cispl.ca fe - 4 asa aa 9 e I Selec4 totj 3 yp e - % i k, wcde r, geu r Rego d.a g A <e r. em U N 2 +h<o. a45 t/d4o -4, I,_%4.ris t _ _ _. _ L M..A<<0 % 2/,sleo - Mr ceput, Aaw die) ;n 1,,4< s by cs.d:.-e, a,,c b yee c4 sc g e TLb C a v cl f is\\ N _ 9 Cellec4iw 5kecks - ]OW Cobeh_. _. _ _ _. _.... _ _.. m:tk. 2, 2 - t u, S r. At( f.teb'cdde.s m ta dec &{ 0 B 0 cc:c$ ccqth' kc ec(lc 5efacake / G c l,f(; n; Y Ca u fc h e 5 p s,wa( S;ed occcW boo tc G -zd -zs 3 I?ty:e >el cefed ble u ihnud Geto.h ccq dek, Acfa sed 40 QA atwfu neawdl,( l RHet m:eco $;lnel i Aed:4?eck bock t> \\ ul;< dud cos,. der %.bc -G; i e -fo< doch incfco sme.d. l k k se u ( ofsoi4 2 froec< caal Cesders tt se&,un se . ca. 6 vt c\\ ve + i-2 n l

CD Nniclear bc;caces { Cab. d2 . sear t of oo as cal. lyd ic.. da4es so.o e os t d3 beria.\\ CI 0 0 2.0 0 eq);htd;ca A14es Sc4 4e as 1 3 Togged ook0( Ser< ice diW cp?ctk'og(WN% 0 Pregc A V N c o h E<s an] q\\\\ c4her l a:AcorueEs al % cascoc4lv e r "G.acot.'Ckart" iafeb ko.ti)c, Calco leskek ai Soccces kve cr gc cb c(naved sers;cc, cledc-do 'Arack c\\ecay iltroog i sjear. $ l clai(j "5.4 n. c a cced ple,4{el es chc.ci, Opeuk.g ta-A c.,ch.s3 avet Llaic aiec,&.:nsicoaeod ( kifvick Scid dcckio a covotec ! E c'c knic.t LS Jr. lel 16 96C3Y-300 -on Cal. IO-IT ~16 .DJc . lc - I '1 - 7 Ct 3 .54:ckec bdeo " Glide Be9<eeudt dw_" .(. zee s.na<q Co.,veks -Coc Sect.c,12.0) d u C, awn 4 c( Sc;d;(ledic.4.Specirmeder Sec. 74CO 34 Ca.\\. 1 - 2 t -S 0 bo e l-z V-8 L "S ec;n\\ Sa~gles 01\\y " t Rea <u c c.-A Accc\\ le.< o4.ska Aa<ls A o A BS .Sa~ ele emes: 4 a.d dou.vedab 41% ckad c.slec in cMce. .s4ccage (Aec o.,at sn), AsF, Kewo/ nee 7c.we Dh4e<.se~ote y Au R.AccAfe sa~ete =Ao< age ch..A. gesd co 1:ah%L'Coohen 1,2 a-cl 2 por hoch C W 'A.seeonde ico., dses act doce la b ep;e u.s e. __ _ YnceSci0 Se;escec k'.Na.ns,.b:Ne~4er: T~ asekl$e Leaeee eco+sce%oa\\ get secs;ca. 'SO) \\< C, t c Peef eck (100 \\ Dicot Ee< m'i, tit L *2 Stoi / la.1 9(07 h)r.lf Creek Fielk bah CMC Cee k Vgeid:v4 Qu4ded t<t he " &mt k<yr pou\\at u s we n ~' cLecked 1 P1 Recork k H. nn Apr ~D.s e No v 4ytdien aak Lad LbeJb40<loauce 5li/so Compob Pr;.4 pe(J.bh -Tone 79 Co.mpAe< fr:.d Frque.uf of Spec;e.s Ty pel dcd<t vec;4;ed .S ecies \\id dOct Mees go; beciar I haN .. b f chec)<e

l\\qach c. Sc; eacea L Ex< kc.c i.hicebo r r<i ceL<es maaval ee,c Sed to., 2 me.dl.cs, F.deries, Pla.Mo.t . Doc, Elecir: c bu:..<e k,u (d qn t}ec,,Js decll,34 <jortz-qogg z cet GO F; ell Tcq tjeg,ct F:les-reec ci.(c c eaek Ac; y wo.xAk\\q s44as seecA., a /lakct hocawed G k<cl Fe<ma 'tc9 i >0 ft/so Bc.dkos K. %.apen,6ccep keodee, 6. LewtS 'l o9 fe I,.oce f ie.. -4 %e4 60 M el A slezd Poaar.:n. ple ecgie,e.d L c ci ccA<ol .stre A Pro ce. s s hee 4 4(,.,w ci es, 6 mtsc -t u.o n g ( <Icq G l.cca <.i -4 s/ia/vo 3c.+4 fi, e 9, 3 hAcet ca.ne<b c..Ao N:kjp ec un. I, e s.3, ul, 'l i Sevet es Miec:.;4j P<ihsei d;<ech k{ Se ce(cci c'(irr redared ccfy wa C P< i.h ve<,(; cd o t., 9/q/go Fisko. ;e, deAh.g Flev.ucle< cc.)doodia.t dak q : 60 Ap4d Floo+ebe.Alubl FeSo % :.ho.y cen % \\ m.k er t= Ic00 . Se.-/4.( EO20 f 3 C cht.%dic,. si,ect Ac"/n/to c.ci:brko.t. Pic a. sc.~e %A s, s.aler "<<; th " ca Ge.ashq

4. t4 * ;e,.bcrec4o r Lu.bordtceg Masa.rl Scr Ancs sis i k & n}Pf,. d n }e '. fr a, t$ css Se/ 2

'* *1 ~l ac i A. y., p&c c1e.-i6< p ((.idcae, a J &:Is, s edu. s, be q ce,,;see\\. Ao < eX \\ect E9A 19 7 C. lit.a tdet G A ab(',nved 9sv3 0 ['I C; cc. eIc...e.il ccc,mcde QI4 f cga-9%vc] ser wrier cla w;dcy Ac .b y. h ocpi, c 2euL c mooud og rea cen elo: em ceciecols h.- beld

  1. 1ot5 NSP M -2

'*l-tl60 LJ:le. Cle; sic.j bdz 3l,ed & &,wsF.% : 4aL, fIcz., % he ca\\deci beisty sei y -hie rce.g:<a- ,yaie,4 e.-1.,a,oLai m,,n h g h c A aL AW.g de.h in beed lah noiebeck. by thqicct ve<.%%s een ch c.t hck stweis <Alac.- % aca bccks \\o Jec, cqeeved 4 h cec +p p<:.+00+ cI,ec L cl ly yo: l M acec.A "ci,cc kJ uy pocel11/80 ka..,s asj Liga;n s 70 9 l c ce

M< Sc;eaces P. %Ake lemew To>o e.y (c. deda kaat T~e Ie...e fcq by ke leeltom' {; n e d; rec-b fa o m der C hcd tea.-aec 5 - Wewed, Aphed,4(; le) 'IC l3 B.H e s Winc\\ Syed, ufger g o +13 .5 '-l e 3 seg dud 36 -.b c.s A e q w 4'ec.w god 3 -3/.so io 8 O a 1 acct.16,w.1.s:+e s o, n.e,c,80 site 3 GA 0hOs moreAregJeA Nat pmh4 h;.d cd h j hea 9 r & cc.,Ad e <?A poid 5 Oba5jhaba Ebsess,veb SkeeW C.3 - 3 4 61ecar Li.,ccln drec.t Of3h9 ( WLee cct\\ea.~, cho d phe cetA checks for pucer opeyMm Pre-gdhed ph tarcir + veetSj dda.se t c n e er es*s -*--qw =- -- e e esm w e-, +. *- p ,_-,m. 4,.v+-_-hem.,-- --emo--. 4- _a**e,me*e,e4 -i- + ,eu.-m.ew-- i.. g ,,,,,ieog-- e .m. ,me% e 6-+weoe -*'N 4.% w ,me .--www.- am. .es-m- -ens 4--Dee Me s 4 ~ ^ + mm-m.m,am A me m' A. s.. 5 - ~ abw-m- m -e.-mawe-,p w =m.,*, bu g y ,,a e-sei-1*- hip ._%.,.m 4 .,_w, _,ww_ty--- g-w

.(' A HAZLETON LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. Environmental Sciences Division Director Dr. R. M. Dagnall i I Vienna Northbrook Lincoln Analytical Chemistry Air Sciences Aquatic Sciences Metabolism Aquatic Sciences Chemistry Radioimmuneassay Aquatic Toxicology Terrestrial Sciences Metrology Chemistrr Marine Sciences Nuclear Sciences Terrestrial Sciences RMD 7/80

V v HAZLETON LABORATORIES NiERICA, INC. Environmental Sciences Division (Vienna) Director Dr. R. M. Dagnall Chemistry Metrology Vacant D. Pullen (Acting Director Dr. R. M. Dagnall) (Section Supervisor) Analytical Chemistry Metabolism Radioinununeassay Dr. J. Andrews Dr. J. Andrews N. Beaudry (Acting Section Supervisor) (Section Supervisor) (Section Supervisor) RMD 7/80

o %,/ s HAZLETON LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. Environmental Sciences Division (Northbrook) Director Dr. R. M. Dagnall Administrative Secretary Personnel Quality Assurance Ms. S. Slawin R. Robinson H. J. Delinck Vacant Laboratory Manager i l Scientific Operations Administrative Operations Acting Director: Dr. K. Evans Director: P. Roberts Air Sciences Accounting (Acting Director: N. Keay) {' Manager: W. Krasnow) Aquatic Sciences Field Operations and Assets (Director: L. Everhart) (Manager: J. Hallquist) ~ Aquatic Toxicology Library (lianager: Dr. T. Haciorowski) (Ms. R. Corn) Chemistry Cartography (Di rector: Dr. L. Petrie) (Ms. P. Parshall) Marine Sciences Word Processing (Director: Dr. S. LeGore) [ Manager: Ms. S. Al tman) Nuclear Sciences Information Services [Diector: LTHuebner) [ Manager: R. Johnson) Terrestrial Sciences Purchasing & Facilities (Director: Dr. K. EvansJ (Manager: M. Hottinger) Client Services RMD 7/80

%/ HAZLETON LABORATORIES AMERICA, INC. Environmental Sciences Division (Lincoln) i Director Dr. R. M. Dagnall L H. S. Lewis Laboratory Manager Aquatic Sciences Terrestrial Sciences Chemistry 1 RMD 7/80 >}

e,. QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT FORM 6.4 ~ s Sygg,L,3,3 3,,,,,, mpe, ~ Hc ee l+o.1 L2bu d oe;cs An a.ca Lsc WISCONSIN Electnc eo.na couesnr (h;,.l;k-[MadNf5UNCs/ 231 W. MICHIGAN, P.O. BOX ?'46. ?'88WAUKEE, WI 53201 ATTENDENCE LIST NAME COMPANY TITLE s PRE-AUDIT MEETItiG N -T .Dc: [ i a c k d4 'i! {ckoa Obegr, Q G L.b. Ncebnec hiredce, ec.ie,c Sc;e,in 3 C. W raco+ G<cq l.co<be, raec. lea. Sc;e se: D R DJ'd w w h) :sco,is ;.1 E ledric Pr fed hg;eer,Q A o D E. t20binsen s' o DURING AUDIT N. ~J, h e I; 6 c k Ha fel foa 61alAo., gcwo.mA gaaic;p,b gf g;sc;pj.e i., Mes eded ) ) M. Do.due w (E. .b. Q elo'.s5 ^ g l i i POST-AUDIT MEETING l M, 3 Mc k hiedC. N A7le k c t L 6. Rochec C. Alava cet si 1 dO dtn .h. G. @obincon I PAGE I 0F f}}