ML20041D971

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Assigns Lead Responsibility to Formulate Plan of Action to Address Steam Generator Problems.Two Commission Papers Will Be Needed
ML20041D971
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/17/1982
From: Dircks W
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Minogue R
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH (RES)
Shared Package
ML20041D969 List:
References
SECY-82-072, SECY-82-72, NUDOCS 8203090688
Download: ML20041D971 (2)


Text

-[*'

UNITED STATES p

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n

g

,i WASHINGTON. o. c. 20555 February 17, 1982 MEMORANDUM FOR:

Robert B. Minogue, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research FROM:

William J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations

SUBJECT:

OVERALL STEAM GENERATOR PROGRAM As you know, as a result of concerns raised by the Chairman associated with the overall program to address the steam generator problems, I discussed this issue with the various Office Directors involved. As a result, I am assigning you the lead responsibility working jointly with NRR to pull together a plan of action to address the steam generator concerns. You should consult with and get input from other offices, particularly IE, as necessary.

I envision the development of two papers for the Commission's information and consideration:

1.

The first paper, to be developed in a short time frame, should address principally the question of "What is going on now?", and "What has happened to date?" The general framework of this paper would include:

A discussion of the problems (both regulatory and economic) a.

and their safety significance; b.

What programs are now going on within the NRC, DOE, USN, industry (including EPRI and AIF), and international programs. The NRC efforts include the NRR efforts on Unresolved Safety Issues A-3, 4, 5, as well as ongoing RES efforts; c.

The short term fixes that have been proposed and/or implemented for individual problems over the years and some insight into difficulties; d.

Staff recomendations on the short term actions (for all affected reactors) believed to be prudent to ensure that public health and safety are protected; and A general idea of possible direction to attack the problen in the e.

long term.

2.

Recognizing that current efforts (NRC and regulated industry) are probably not nearly enough, a second paper, again working jointly with NRR, should be developed.

This would include what additionally 8203090688 820218 PDR SECY 82-072 PDR

.e 2

must be done, and a plan of action for a joint research effort to provide a definitive resolution. To assure a creditable product, close coordination with industry will be required. Perhaps a lead group representing the industry, such as EPRI can, together with NRC staff, ACRS, and other consultants as necessary, form a steering group to identify what must be done, who should do what to assure canplete coverage without overlap and the priorities of work - to include the inspection program.

I would like you to report to me at the weekly meetings regarding progress, problems, or action I can take to move this program along in an expeditious manner.

/

yge.b e

Will am J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations CC: Chairman Palladino Commissioner Gilinsky Commissioner Bradford Commissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts H.R. Denton/NRR R.C. DeYoung/IE

-