ML20041D721

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Clarification of NRC Ack That Insufficient Info Used in Allowing safety-related Const to Resume.Requests in-depth Info Re Decision & Testing Procedures
ML20041D721
Person / Time
Site: Marble Hill
Issue date: 11/06/1981
From: Hamilton L
HOUSE OF REP.
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20041D715 List:
References
NUDOCS 8203090018
Download: ML20041D721 (1)


Text

~

EE H, H AM tl. TON 21e7 Raisvese IburtsHase Waseeweto= O C.

10515 TYw DTNC7. leso'aaa Ttrapwoma. (102) 225-5315 CO M M ITT EE!

Congregg of tf.)c THnitch dibtates u-7='Z ~,CL--

e

- e Caumous. i= Diana 47201 PORElGN AFFAIR $

'kouse of Representatibeg IZ'~~~'fiiU',%'

EEfasf>Ington, D.C. 20515 uwe o --

re=uiucsT srece,

comuiTTec on mrscuar~ce Novenber 6, 1981

".'",Z.'i2I:7. 'l9 4

T P.O. IBoa 149 AusonA, I=osana 4700t Tabernores (012) 926 3535 e

lionorable Nunzio Palladino Chairman U.S. Nuclear Reculatcry Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Chairman:

I am writi'ng to inquire about the acknowledgement by the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that it used insufficient in-formation in deciding to allow safety-related construction to re-1 sume at the Marble liill nuclear facility in Madison, Indiana.

I would like to know, in detail and as promptly as possible, I

exactly what is wrong with the ultrasound tests which the NRC re-viewed prior to its decision to restart safety-related construction at the site.

Please include in your discussion a clear and concise explanation of both the testing procedures themselves and the math-ematical insufficiency described by Dr. Cassaro.

How is it that this insufficiency was not recognized immediately?

Who was re-sponsible for the failure to recognize it?

Was there any abuse of discretion in the decision which allowed safety-related con-struction to move forward?

What options are open to the NRC to rectify the problem?

Will more tests have to be performed to en-sure that the facility is safe?

Will different kinds of tests be ordered?

Will a declaration that the tests were sufficient address the objection that the facility is unsafe because prior standards were not met?

I i

I look forward to receiving your written replies to my requests for information.

I With best vishes, I am J

Si e

lv yours, EE h.

IAMILTON, M.C.

LHH:vbm 8203090018 820212 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR i