ML20041D575
| ML20041D575 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 02/16/1982 |
| From: | Starostecki R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041D567 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-247-82-01, 50-247-82-1, NUDOCS 8203050425 | |
| Download: ML20041D575 (1) | |
Text
,
APPENDIX A f
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Consolidated Edison Company Docket No. 50-247 Indian Point Unit 2 License No. DPR-26 As a result of the inspection conducted on January 1-31, 1982, and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy 45 FR 66754 (October 7,1980), the following violation was ideritified:
A.
Criterion VI of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Document Control states, " Measures shall be established to control the issuance of documents, such as in-structions, procedures, and drawings..."
Station Administrative Order (SA0) No.102, Revision 6, in Paragraphs 2.5.8 and 2.5.12, which describe Section Head responsibility, states in part, "He shall assure that procedure distribution lists are current and updated (or make new list (s) and document same each time procedures are distributed," and, " assure that the latest approved revisions of pro-cedures are available and followed as required."
Contrary to the above, during the inspection period January 1-31, 1982, the inspector identified incorrect revisions to Controlled Procedures in the Central Control Room, Watch Foreman's Office, Nuclear and Con-ventional Operator's Offices and the Radiation Waste Supervisor's Office.
This is a Severity Level V Violation, Supplement I.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of the Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including:
(1) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending your response time.
The responses directed by this Notice are not subject to the clearance proce-dures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Papemork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
Dated
^
Aphard W. Starostecki, Director, Division of Resident and Project Inspection j
8203050425 820216 PDR ADOCK 05000247 G
...