ML20041C627
"Draft Meeting" is not in the list (Request, Draft Request, Supplement, Acceptance Review, Meeting, Withholding Request, Withholding Request Acceptance, RAI, Draft RAI, Draft Response to RAI, ...) of allowed values for the "Project stage" property.
| ML20041C627 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/22/1982 |
| From: | Heltemes C NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Stello V NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19291F701 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8203020397 | |
| Download: ML20041C627 (1) | |
Text
_
[
UNITED STATES o
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION e,
{
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 l
w.....-
FEB 321982 MEMORANDUM FOR: Victor Stello, Jr., Chairman Comittee to Review Generic Requirements FROM:
C. J. Heltemes, Jr., Member Committee to Review Generic Requirements
SUBJECT:
MINUTES OF CRGR MEETING NUMBER 7 The draft minutes of the CRGR meeting Number 7 dated February 18, 1982 reflect the general discussion and conclusions associated with the proposed rule on documenting SRP differences under the proposed implementation schedule. However, the draft minutes do not reflect the discussions regarding the possible application of the proposed rule to only future. plants whose FSAR is in the early stage of development. As noted in my previous oral and written comments, I favor further analysis to detemine whether the proposed rule would be justified if applied to only future plants in light of the greatly reduced resource commitment that would result if the SRP differences were documented as an integral part of the FSAR development.
t i A %
C.
leTrews r.,
Member C
ttee to Re w Generic Requirements cc: RBernero, RES DEisenhut, NRR EJordan, IE DMausshardt, NMSS JScinto, ELD TMurley, DEDORGR WSchwink, DEDORGR h
R