ML20041B226
| ML20041B226 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1982 |
| From: | Walbridge W SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.A.1.3, TASK-TM NUDOCS 8202230407 | |
| Download: ML20041B226 (2) | |
Text
_
..m
$suun SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O 6201 S street, Box 15830, Sacramento, Califomia 95813; (916) 452-3211 i
February 11, 1982 s8 4
c'
[
RECENED
.q FEB 221982d JOHN F STOLZ, CHIEF enn m m m twesa }
OPERATING REACTORS BRANCH 4
" "ec T
DIVISION OF LICENSING g
g U S NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
^
(4 WASHINGTON DC 20555 NUREG 0737, ITEM 1.A.1.3(2), MINIMUtl SHIFT STAFFING Your letter of January 15, 1982 requested a review of our implementation schedule ~ for minimum shift staffing, and a reply by February 12,.1982.
1 i
The District had recognized the necessity for increased staffing in the Licensed Operatcr area prior to the issuance of the interin. criteria.
Current efforts to establish a six-crew rotation are progressing,. but full compliance with the interim criteria is seriously affected by~the.
one-year experience requirement for senior reactor operators licenses.
Attached is a schedule for training which indicates when various classes of hot license training are expected to start and when the licenses-would be expected to be obtained. The schedule is based on needing 12 senior reactor operators and 12 reactor operators. Par.t A of the schedule does not take into account attrition of the licensed personnel. Part B of-the schedule assumes approximately a 30% attrition rate. The interim requirements and the overall impact on the industry of the requirement j
that licensed operators have actual operating experience give reason to assume Part B is more realistic.
The. District will submit a Proposed Technical Specification Amendment reflecting the.new criteria as soon as actual staffing at Rancho Seco would allow full compliance.
If you have.any. questions -regarding this matter, please contact Mr. R. Colombo of my staff at Rancho Seco.
r
}
/
/
A Wm.
C.
Walbridge General Manager
[
t
{
8202230407 820211 PDR ADOCK 05000312 P
'AN ELECTRIC $YSTE M S E RVIN G.MoRE THAN 600,000 IN THE HEART of C All F O R N I A
. - ~
[o.
r i
LICENSED OPERATOR TRAINING i
Part A j
a.
1.
Number of Licensed Operators as 'of February 9,1982i SR0 - 9 R0 - 10.
2.
Number of Licensed Operators needed per interim " criteria:
SR0 12 R0 - 12 3.
Connencing 5/81, 2 R0's in-tra'ining for SR0, licensed by 3/82.
4.
Commencing 5/81, 3 operators in. training.for R0, licensed by 10/82.
I 5.
Commencing 8/82, 3 R0's in training for SR0, licensed hy 3/83.
~
6.
Commencing 8/82, 5 operators in training for R0,f4 licensed by 11/83.
7.
Commencing 5/83, 2 RO's in training for SR0, licensed by 11/83.
8.
Number of Licensed Operators by November 1983, assuming no terminations or retirements, interim criteria is met.
SR0 - 16 RO - 11 1
Part B
)
1.
Assuming 30%' turnover rate, 1 additional SR0 and 4 additional R0's-are required.
2.
Commencing 11/83, 5 operators in training for R0, 4 licensed hy 2/84.
3.
Commencing 3/84, 3 R0's in training for SR0, licensed by 7/84.
4.
Commencing 3/84, 5 operators.in training for R0, 4 licensed hy 6/85.
5.
Number of Licensed Operators by 6/85, assuming 30% turnover:
SR0 - 14 R0 - 11 4
e 1
_