ML20041A314
| ML20041A314 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 01/29/1982 |
| From: | Scott D COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20041A310 | List: |
| References | |
| 81-264, NUDOCS 8202190415 | |
| Download: ML20041A314 (4) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l l
/
Commonwealth Edison
/
Dresden NuCar Power Station
/
R.R. 41 Morris, Illinois 60450 Telephone 815/942 2920 l
Date h m a nnni A &_ } Q Q DJS LTR: 81-264 l
Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director I
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures for Dresden Station Units 1, 2, and 3; NRC Docket Nos. 50-10, 50-237, and 50-249
References:
(a) D. J. Scott letter to H. R. Denton, dated March 12, 1981 (b) Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Appendix E, Part V
Dear Mr. Denton:
Enclosed are ten (10) copies of revisions to Dresden Station-Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures.
No return of transmittals is necessary.
Sincerely,
.I (AY D.
. Scott Station Superintendent Dresden Nuclear Power St2cion
'DJS:TGB:mt Enclosures 3
/;0)'
cc:
T. Blackmon File /NRC
[p/
.e ',7j g
File / Numerical
[-: I i
O 3 '332 % '
.r.:a 92,::ca 0
- . A .CO:( tA i:::
N -. x
,g//
'ai s
90f 1
b# /
8202190415 820211
/
PDR ADOCK 05000010
)
p PDR i
)
j.
\\
' I'
. /'-
DAP 9-2 23.I ORESDEN STATION PROCEDURE ROUTING Revision 11 v~
PROCEDURES COORDINATOR NOTIFIED
,(
(
index t< umber f
Unit ///
Procedure 66[ <70 / ~ /
Revision No.
3 I
Title
'I~./
- b
/ /4--S5/ MmA
/
~
~ 1 Req'd. Compl. Date Record Retention Requirements:
a Action Item No.
1.
Is a Surveillance affected? A/8 (Submit DAP 11-2 pgs. 5 or 6)'
Modification No.
2.
.Is a Station Record Type being established?
- 6 Draft Review:
a.
If "yes", specify record Deletion?
A/ 6 retention requirenents.
Posted Procecure?
A/ d
_, % (as per Tech. Spec. Sec.
Posted Location?
A/o 6.5, ANSI N45.2.9 App. A Typing Required?
VE S or DAP 2-3)
Index Change Requireal VES b.
If "yes", obtain record type number %,,(see R3 Coordinator) k 1.
I Originator i
R_ outinc
- 2. J a OL L 7pe.
%l%m TS e.
Deparment Supervisor
[
e n. Staff Supervisor i
dn Mb A W,
e.
it/n-qs s.
1 l
Verifier
/'
/
Sury ' lance Cooroinator 4./ b h okN 5.
13.
10.
-[
JM Procecures[foortfinnor l
Maint. Asstr 'up f(atf./ Chem. Sup. gg S.
m
-oll.
/
M
~
Procecures :4anager Operating Eng1 e
'or 5R0
- 7. fas/L L B
lAnwl, a Ds.
,2.
__9E121gatBE_12EB21Ee89L_
stationisuats TRANSMITTAL RECEIPT M/O Re ter No.
b.
REMOVE: d[/[ 3CTd'/
b JL
- M ' '/@# APPROVED INSERT: E /> //* M -/
4p. 3 JAN 26'82 D.O.S.R.
l I hereby acknowledce recei;st of the above.
Signed Date (Sign and return thir. fona to the Fracedures Manacer.)
FOPM 9-2A 18 of 24
=
4
.i.--.....,.
_ f.
\\
J CAP 9-2
(,
Revision 11
(:/
PROCEDURE HISTORY
,i Prccedure _2/I$0 Sod -l Rev. No.
0 I
l Ekscript'ica of Piocedure Revision or of New Procedure D\\$1E'
$50Tl
$a us
.)
l 144/
ll inl,w Au J ###s L.
/
fl Y T dos O,
iro L 3$
' L.
Amp Justification for f4w or Revised Procedure f/) Y
,A 4
- a 12%-
~
i.-
/
~
hL ~.
s 2
/ a? -f 4
m Oostn s k L' <ssep t -
Supportive References A W GSff fl6 3
u Fom 9-2B APPROVED JAN 26'82 19 of 24 U,0,S,R, e
m.
m m
j f
~
DAP 9-2 t
SAFETY O.'ALUATION Revisica 11
,! Q]
(10 CFR 50 53) f Oces this precacure/ revision ccnsti tute a : ange t orecedures as described in Safety Analvsis ?.ccert?
i Yes ( )
Ko @
e 4
l j is a change in ene Tecnnica!
lSoecification involved?
No ( )
s o
SAFETY EVALUATION: Answer tne fol lcwing cuestions wi tn a "yes" cr "no", and provide speci fic reascns justifying the decision:
1.
Is the probabliity of an occurrence, the consequence of an acci-dent, or malfunction of safety related equipment, as previously evaluated in the Final Safety Analysis Report, increased?
N No, because: p ggg Yes f --
2.
is he possibilit.y for an. accident or malfunction of a different
^
.a
**7 ^"' *
"'"* *""" '"' " " '*"' ' ' ""* X Mo, beca u s e:
~
~
C
3 Report created?
Yes Ar /
3 Is the margin of safety, as defined irr the basis for any Tech-t nical Specification, reduced?
Yes [ No, because:
8Q.
/
Any Answer
- Yes ( )
All Answers Me p f
Aeques t anc receive.'tuclear APPROVED Regulatory cer=ission authorization for change.
JM 26'82 D'0 S*R*
l Authori:ation Recei sed ( )
+
- NOTE:
[ initiate ?rt.cacure Any answer che:hed "yes" Imale entaticn should be recceted in :he Perfer=ed 3y I
annual recert
.c :h e
".~.C.
Date @ $ $ ' f /
FO!'.:: a-ac.
- 20 of 24
'N 6
.p
-.. - _