ML20041A128

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Forwards Addl Info Requested in NRC in Response to NRC Generic Ltr 81-14 Re Seismic Qualification of Auxiliary Feedwater Sys
ML20041A128
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/1982
From: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
775, GL-81-14, NUDOCS 8202190140
Download: ML20041A128 (3)


Text

I.

e e

e TOLEDO

%se EDISON RCHAre P. CROUSE

$w 141912SS5221 Docket No. 50-346 License No. NPF-3 t-Serial No. 775 cb February 10, 1982 8

HSCEIVED s

2 FEBI 879826 h Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Wasumm 7 '

mc Attention:

Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut, Director Division of Licensing ru United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission to

/

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

NRC Generic Letter 81-14 requested that we review the seismic qualification of the Auxiliary Feedwater System for the Davis-Besse Nuclear Po.ar Station, Unit No. 1.

In our July 15, 1981 letter to you, Serial No. 729, we responded to Generic Letter 81-14.

On January 11, 1982 we received a request, from the Staff, for additional information concerning the seismic qualification of the Auxiliary Feedwater System. Attached is our response to the Staff's request.

t Yours very truly, RPC:CLM cc: NRC Davis-Besse Resident Inspector db b/5 M

O 9(g L

THE TOLEDO EDISON COMPANY EDISON PLAZA 300 MADISON AVENUE TOLEDO. OHIO 43652 8202190140 820210 PDR ADOCK 05000346 P

pyg

9 -

Docket No.'50-346-License No. NPF-3 Serial No.' 775 February 10, 1982 Response to NRC Generic Letter 81-14 Seismic Qualification of the Auxiliary 'Feedwater System Additional Information Request In response to your January 6,1982 request for additional information regarding the seismic qualification of the Auxiliary Feedwater.(AFW)-

. System, we are providing the following answers:

Question 1:

Clarify whether a walkdown was performed for the condensate storage tank (CST) and the portion of the suction side piping from the CST to the

- entrance of the auxiliary. building.

Response 1:

A walkdown was not performed for the CST and the suction piping from the

. CST to the auxiliary building. -The rational behind not walking down this non-seismic portion of the AFW system is that it is not required to supply water to the AFW pump following a seismic event. As explained in our previous response (Serial No. 729) the seismic category I source of water-for the AFW pumps is provided by the service water system (SWS).

If the non-seismic portion of the AFW system should.be damaged during a seismic event, its loss of function will be detecte'd by: low pressure switches located in the seismic category I portion of the piping from the CST (i.e.; inside the auxiliary building). These switches, upon low pressure, will automatically transfer. the suction of L the auxiliary feedwater pumps -

(AFPs) to the SWS. All equipment required to effect the switchover from the CST to the SWS is seismic category I.

We have-not taken credit for the non-seismic portion of the AFW system in our Final Safety Analysis-Report.

Question 2:

Provide information on your scheduled completion date for:

a.

Modifications to the auxiliary feedwater (AFW) pump turbine (AFPT) pipe support.

b.

Reevaluation and any resultant modifications for compliance with IE Bulletin 80-11 for the 29 concrete masonry unit block walls.

Reference'to your. response to IE Bulletin No. 80-11 dated September 29, 1981 where applicable is appropriate. Please indicate walls /subwalls affecting the AFW system.

l' l:

c.

Proposed redesign and rerouting of the AFPT exhaust piping.

l i

.:---....-.~-

.~

.,,n,

i i

e o

Response 2a:

The design of the modifications to the AFPT pipe supports has been completed and is oeing implemented under facility change request (FCR)79-421. The modifications consist of adding one lateral support, replacing each of two sway struts with a snubber, changing out a spring on each of two supports, resetting a spring on each of two supports, and relocating a stanchion for one support. We presently plan to have these modifications completed by the end of the 1982 refueling outage, scheduled to begin February 26, 1982.

Response 2b:

i The concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls /subwalls which support or are penetrated by AFW system piping and electrical circuits which passed the acceptance criteria established for IE Bulletin No. 80-11 are listed below:

CMU Walls Passing Acceptance Criteria 304D 2317 4607 2

307D 2347 4617 1147 2357 4627 2227*

2367 4687 2237 4587 4757 2247 4597 4816

  • Wall 2227 has been added to the list since our previous submittal.

i The wall is penetrated by the AFW pump exhaust piping discussed in response 2c.

r The walls /subwalls which did not meet the acceptance criteria and require modification are listed below:

4 CMU Walls Requiring Modifications 2297 3187 4796 3036 3447 4826 3167 4016 4886 3177 4647 4896 The modifications to walls /subwalls 3447, 4647 and 4826 have been completed.

i The modification to the remaining nine walls /subwalls will be completed in January 1983.or sooner as indicated in our September 29, 1981 letter, Serial No. 1-217.

l Response 2c:

The AFW pump turbine exhaust piping has been redesigned and rerouted to provide separate exhausts from each of the turbines. The new piping is seismic category I and missile protected. This modification was installed i

under FCR 79-421 and is completed.

i db b/5

--_