ML20040H344
| ML20040H344 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinch River |
| Issue date: | 02/11/1982 |
| From: | Kammerer C NRC OFFICE OF CONGRESSIONAL AFFAIRS (OCA) |
| To: | Baker H, Bouguard M, Duncan J, Sasser J HOUSE OF REP., SENATE |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-E, NUDOCS 8202180127 | |
| Download: ML20040H344 (1) | |
Text
. wha
_m-.we.
.+ehmy a,.he c
\\
\\
r
\\
cg.T[
\\
\\
F S
ly\\ D.-
s
- s.,,
2:
6 :U.:.... cU.
v. ~.'y..
4-r, u Q? _
c Ll
' i ?
7-'
p, The Honorable Marilyn Bouquard l
Q' ?>
gd.,.$.. p (M..-- k
.'L
.E..", 2 j N
y United States House of Representati sN v..G?.Y Uashington, D.C.
20515
/ lyj 7,,
Dear Congresswoman Bouquard:
Thank you for'your letter da ted December 15, 1981, concerning the Department' of the Clinch River Breeder Reactor. Energy's (DOE) request for an e On Decenber 24, 1981, procedures it will be following for considering the nerits
, for an exenption to pemit then to uncertake certain site preparation activities prior to the issuance of a construction pemit or limited work authoriza tion by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
would pemit a Comission decision by early !! arch on this request.The schedu The Commission appreciates receiving your ceaents with respect to this request and will include thea as part of the record of the proceeding.
Sincerely,
'Da:1 ten 7cere*}
Carl ton.arr.erer, Director Office. of Congressional Affairs
Enclosure:
As stated Identical letter sent to:
- h. Howard Baker L
Rep. John Duncan 993 Re N James Sasser 5.
hDRADOCK82021e0127 gyng,,
05000537 J
...q num S Kent-
~..
,-n.....,..........
u romse s.e r u n ar u man
',, _p F F 1 C.I..i I S C e ^ ^ ' ~~ ~ ~ ^
.__-.---y
.o
.r--
Q3 4
g g$eN;=g'*aa -
== a- - "
ame=
. uxnivu u.cyo souturno
. 1 s
- ,da,
,e_= ~,, nen,'_'*"
Congre## of ti,)cIEnitch $btated.
'am us'a""
^
~ ~a""
Kpouse of Representatibeg
=c' c """ " ^ * ' " *
. un - o-= -
Oas R oes.T osesasst 37Sao
= " * " " " "
Eastington,33E. 20515 December 15, 1991 s
Honorable Nunzio J. Palladino Chairman co Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7
Washington, D.C.
20505
- 5 Re:
In Re. Department of Energy, et al.,
Dt Clinch River Breeder 7
Reactor Plant - Docket No. 50-$37
$$3
Dear Mr. Chairman:
E5 OO We have been advised that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission E%
will soon be meeting with interested parties to consider the
- t above referenced subject.
In addition to the specific je request of the Department of Energy for authority to expedite t>
site preparation activities for the Clinch River Breeder
%d Reactor the' Commission must consider the concerns of local 5 1 governme,nt jurisdictions.which might be affected by the gg pro]ect.
.8 On Tuesday, December 8, 1981, staff from our offices 5w S iJ met with nine of the fourteen localities which had in 1976 E"
sought to file as intervenors in DOE's application for a
[d, these petitions were dismissed as untimely, the socio-E Limited Work Authorization for the CRBR project.
Although
,g economic impact of the project cited by these local govern-
,u ments was subsequently raised on their behalf by the State of p"
o3h Based on our December 8 meeting, it is our clear im-Q pression that these local jurisdictions now strongly support g;
the application to expedite site preparation activities for.
Eg CRBR.
They intend to communicate their support directly to Ec the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Though we cannot speak
'g directly for these local governmental units, we expect that they will express their intention to withdraw from any o
intervenor proceedings, to request that any issues raised on 8k" o
their b'ehalf be withdrawn, and to support the DOE request for permission to expedite site preparation activities.
u a
~. 8 J"
Because in most instances, the communication to the NRC from the local jurisdictions will require the concurrence of city councils or other government bodies, it is impossible for many of them to complete formal action in time for the j
December 16th meeting of the Commission..Nevertheless, we f S
).)M 9)
E 1
-~
... -. _ _. = - _ =. _,.
.=
..... ~.. -. - -.. -
consider it appropriate to convey to the Commission at this time, for inclusion in the Commission's deliberations, the strong local sentiment in support of the CRBR project and DOE's request to the NRC.
The support of the localities attending the December 8 meeting in Tennessee was unanimous, and we have every reason to expect that those jurisdictions unable to be represented at the meeting will also concur in the consensus to withdraw from intervenor proceedings, and to support the request of the Department of Energy to commence with Clinch River site preparat*on activities as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
_z = =
?
M f
fd H. B r(,
U.S.S.-
es' R. Sassdr, U.S.S.
k r.f_'_) &_
n.- A 72 Martly# L. BouqulXrd, M.C7 ohn J. p dan, M.C.
t e
9 e
9 6
i
=--,.e..
-.e.
..e,.
--*g-,%.
.--m
%$9.-.weo w-mw=<=