ML20040H337

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Release of Repts Requested by Franklin Research Ctr Would Violate Tech Specs.Documents Requested Address Equipment Environ Qualification Only Partially.Contractor Invited to Inspect Documents on Site
ML20040H337
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/09/1982
From: Lundvall A
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To: Clark R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, NUDOCS 8202180113
Download: ML20040H337 (1)


Text

..

BALTI M O RE GAS AND ELECTRIC CHARLES CENTER P. O. BOX 1475 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND 21203 February 9, 1982 ARTHUR E. LUNCVALL. JR.

Vicc PRESIDENT -

SUPPLY Q

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission S

Washington, D. C.

20555 NECEiygn,O N 7/S3 g k Attn:

Mr. R. A. Clark, Chief 4

Operating Beactors Branch #3 Division of Licensing Q,

q j

4, 4

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant D

4

'9 Units Nos. 1 & 2; Dockets Nos. 50-317 & 50-31 N" h ' '

Response to I&E Bulletin 70-01B Gentlemen:

Your request for additional information on environmental qualification (EQ) of safety-related equipment included a list of reports and other references identified by Franklin Research Institute, your contractor, as necessary to complete their review. This information is contained in our central file, and as such is available for your inspection at any time. To release this material from our custody would place us j

in violation of our Technical Specifications, i

We are also concerned because the reports and references requested do not conclusively document qualification; rather, they address only some of the environmental parameters pertinent to the various pieces of equipment.

Erroneous conclusions concerning the adequacy of qualification review could be drawn unless other reports and correspondence are considered.

Documents addressing the remainder of the relevant EQ issues are available

-in our EQ central file. We would welcome the opportunity to show your contractor the appropriate documentation in our files and to ernlain its

- specific applicability and the extent of qualification supported.

We wish to point out that some of the requested documentation has already been audited (Inspection Nos. 50-317/80-10 and 50-318/80-09).

We do not believe that any=useful purpose would be served by enditing these documents again. They are, of course, available in our central file should your contractors still wish to see them.

Very truly yours,

/

lM"i!8CA oggggg, PDR cc:

J. A. Biddison, Eequire G. F. Trowbridge. Esquira Messrs. D. H. Jaffe - NRC R. E. Architzel - NRC

]