ML20040G763
| ML20040G763 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 02/09/1982 |
| From: | Warner B, Warner E AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202160441 | |
| Download: ML20040G763 (2) | |
Text
. e==
=
.s 4
'~~'~~*Unngy r-y Q,,.g1982
.g Ottice of the Secretary gN U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi $16n^
'\\,O7 pgg 9 P4.07 Washington, D.C. 20555
\\
- o 8'
//, >
E d. 7;:;C. a a S -p He: Docket No. 50-289 t,
- w' r.,3. -
/w s HP gnMCH n
Q jI f
Dedr NRC:
E-\\
4, fA
./
Q
../
As a pennsylvania resident wno.li'ves downwind t.r om Island, I strongly pr6{est y e decision by the Three Mile Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ihten recommends that reactor No. 1 at Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart
'I H l.
of TML-1 I believe there are many reasons why restart should not be permitted et this time:
. A method of paying for the clean-up of TM1-2 nas not even been agreed to and the clean-up itself has nardly begun.
is an entirely new process, and who knows what The clean-up TMI-2 should be problems may arise. I believe the clean-up of
-- is substantidtly complete before another reactor -- TM1-1 allowed to operate on the same site.
investigation of cneating on qualification tests
. The IMI has not Deen completed. Certainly by reactor operators at this snould be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate at TM1.
. The courts have not had d chance to rule on the issue would cause for of the psychological stress whicn a restart residents in the immediate vicinity of '1 H I. They have a right their case.
to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt
. An adequate evacuation plan for tne ENTIRE hazdrd drea around TMI nas yet to De prepared and accepted. Ihis must include at least a 25-mile tedius.
the ASLB contention tnat Met-Ed and GpU I also reject to operate a nucledt reactor. They told Nuclear are Qualitied couldn't nappen, then covered it up wn11e it us the accident we're,supposea to believe them when they was nappening. And now say it won't happen dQain?
I urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reject the ASLB recommendation. please order that 1P1-1 remain closed until ALL g
of the above proolems are resolved.
5
/ /
Sincerely,
[f&.
h 7 awl t/
'hId g-30 8202160441 820209 D
PDR ADOCK 05000289 Qy(. 'j f, _,3 yg y H
ppg
+.-
i Y3' dbd i
1 F 0.
CU.?.E7F' l
g.
Uttice of the Secretary i
U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
'82 FEB -9 P4 :07 He: Docket No. 50-289 C7FIC,..c 00cd;.J.3a SEn CRANCH Uear NRC:
As a Pennsylvania resident who lives downwind from Three Mile island, I strongly protest the decision by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Boarj enich recommends that Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor No. 1 at TMI.
I believe there are many reasons wny restart of IMI-1 should not be permitted et this time:
_ A method of paying for the clean-up of THI-2 has not even been agreed to and the clean-up itself has hardly begun.
The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knows what problems may arise. I believe the clean-up of TMI-2 should be
-- is substantidlly complete before another reactor -- TM1-1 dllowed to operate on the same site.
The investigation of cnecting on qualification tests by reactor operators at.TMI has not oeen completed. Certainly this snould be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate at Thl.
The courts have not had d chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress Wnicn a restart would cause for residents in the immediate Vicinity of 1Hl. They have a right
~
to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
. An adequate evacuation plan for.the ENTIRE hazard dred around TM1 has yet to be prepared and' accepted. Ihis must
~
~
include at least a 25-in11e rddlus.
s 1 also reject the ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GPU Nuclear are Qualified to operate a nucledt reactor. They told us the accident couldn't nappen, then covered it up wn11e it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to'belitve them When they say it don't happen again?
A 7._., _ ?,. -
urge the Nuclear Regulatory Commi.ssion to reject.the ASLU I
recommendation. Please order that t s41 - 1. "r e m a i n 'c lo s e d' u n t i'l 'iL L of the above proolems are resolved.
~ ~ ~ - -
_ r j + --...-.., _,_
~
- ' H, ~f e Sincerely, h
kn!U A-hIb'C' Iht. rop. 8 icz7
..