ML20040F567

Package of Three Comments Opposing Restart of Facility

ML20040F567
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	02/03/1982
From:	Merrill S, Simon H, Spak J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
NUDOCS 8202090352
Download: ML20040F567 (3)

Text

h N -}gA'j '

i

/N k.

- \\ls s?

7.

c-g i-ary q 1982 FEC 81982gann A

cn=c c m n a Uttice of the Secretary

" fF "

82 FE3 -3 P2:56 U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Com gs)on g

Washington, D.C.

2uS$5

,gjpg

,/

g

)

D.,..

He: Docket No. 50-289 C0MlEia 5E U..CC il D04K5T NUMBIR

~

~

Dear N8C:

PRO.D. & UTIL FAC.<.

As a pennsylvdnla resident wno lives downwind trom Three Mile Island, I strongly protest the decision by the Atomic Safety an3 Licensing Board anicn recommends tnat Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor ho. 1 at

1M1, I believe there are mdny reasons wny restart of IMI-1 should not be permitted at this time:

A method of paying for the cledn-up of fM1-2 nas not even been agreed to and the clean-up itself has ndrdly begun.

The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knows what problems may arise. I believe tne cledn-up of TMI-2 should be is substantidlly complete before another reactor -- TM1-1 allowed to operate on the same site.

_ The investigation of cneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at IMI has not oeen completed. Certainly this snould be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate dL lhl.

_ Ine courts have not had a chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress unicn a restart would cause tor residents in the immediate vicinity of 1MI. They have a right to be nedrd before Met-Ed and tne NHC pre-empt their case.

_ An adequate evecuation plan for tne LNTIRE hazard drea around TM1 nas yet to be prepared and accepted. Ihis must include at least a 25. wile rodius.

I also reject the ASLB contention tnat Met-Ed and GpU Nuclear are Qualified to operate a nuclear reactor. They told us the accident couldn't nappen, tnen covered it up wnile it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to believe them When they say it Won't hdppen dQain?

I urce the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to refect the ASLB recommendation. please order that 1H1-1 remain closed until ALL of the above proolems are resolved.

6 05# 'f 6'

Sincerely, O-5a 209035g j

PH ADOCK 0 O203 000289

//

F_. < ' u f.f.

. 4., ja.

A t.: %

i January 3 /,1982'~

Uttice of the Secretary

, 2 FEB -3 P2 :47 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

205b5 ggsyAJ3 c.u 4

f,CMigp0 He: Docket No. 50-289 OD FAC...

Dear NBC:

As a pennsylvania resident who lives downwind from Three Mile island, I strongly protest the decision by the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board anien recommends that Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor ho. 1 at TMI.

I believe there are odny reasons why restart of IMI-1 should not be permitted at this time:

A method of paying for the clean-up of FMi-2 nas not even been agreed to and the clean-up itsett pas hardly begun, The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who knows what prootems may arise. I believe tne clean-up ot TMI-2 should be substantidily complete D.etore another reactor -- TMi-1 -- is allowed to operate on the same site.

. The investigation of cheating on qualification tests by reactor operators at.TMI has not oeen completed. Certainly this should be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate at Tsi.

The courts nave not had d chance to rule on the issue of the ps,chological stress whien a restatt would cause for residents in the immediate vicinity of IMI. They have a right to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.

An adequate evacuation plan for the ENTIRE hazdro drea around IMI has yet to be prepared and accepted. Ih15 must include at least a 25-mile Iddius.

I also reject the ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GPU Nuclear are qualified to operate a nucledt reactor. They told us the accident couldn't nappen, tnen covered it up wn11e it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to believe them when they say it won't hoppen aq'af.n?

urge tne Nuclear Regu) to'r6C(rpgf.ssion to reject the ASLB I

recommendation. Please order thaE#fM1-1 timlin closed until ALL the above proolems are re {1'Veo.

,3)

S of gu-

~

FEB 3NUc el ely, 40@

ngj$EEIT '

bl. W $

O S

,'g

/

^'/

0' 3/] n O.N.

SIM WCM7, ?4 /lYJf'

(

~

g o,jggg, 7 January

, 1982 b

TMST

'82 FtB -3 P2:31 Uttice of the Secretar, 4 tu 8

M U.S. Nuclear Regulator 'Qommissio Washington, D.C.

20555

,g,g

,t.

E RA!.'C i He: Docket No. 50-289 Dr***-v"""[+nch1Mb,_

PN00.~ & UTIL

Dear NRC:

As a Pennsylvanta resident who 11Ves downwind trom Three Mile Island, I strongly protest the decision by the Atomic Sarety and Licensing Board anien recommends that Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor No. 1 at 1M1.

I believe there are mdny reasons why restart of TMI-1 should not be permitted et this time:

. A method of paying ior the clean-up of THI-2 has not even been agreed to and the clean-up itself has hardly Dequn, The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knows what problems may arise. I believe tne clean-up of THI-2 should be substantially complete before another reactor== THi=1== is allowed to operate on the same site.

The investigation of eneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at TMI has not Deen completed. Certainly this should be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is l

l allowed to operate at T>ti.

. The courts nave not had a chance to rule on the issue would cause for of the psychological stress whien a restart residents in the immediate vicinity of 1MI. They have a right to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.

_ An adequate evacuation plan for the ENTIRE hazard drea arOund TMI nas yet to be prepared and accepted. this must include at least a 25-nile redius.

the ASLB contention tnat Met-Ed and GPU I also reject Nuclear are qualitied to operate a nucledr reactor. They told us the accident couldn't nappen, tnen covered it up while it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to believe them when they say it don't happen aq'in?

a the ASLB I urge tne Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reject recommendation. Please order tnat l'MI-1 remain closed until ALL l

I of the above proolems die resolved.

Sincerely, M

g

~

Herbert B. Sirnon 25 E. Cent.r Street Shavertown, PA 18708

,.m.,

._m

,