ML20040E690

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Info Re Reorganization of Facility Project Ofc & QA Dept
ML20040E690
Person / Time
Site: Midland
Issue date: 01/26/1982
From: Jackie Cook
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
References
NUDOCS 8202050249
Download: ML20040E690 (13)


Text

e b

?

Consumers Power i Pr sid

- Projects, Engineering and Construction General offices: 1945 West Parnall Road, Jackson, MI 49201 * (517) 788-0453 January 26, 1982 J RINCIPAL STAFF t 6IR E&IS D/D PA0 A/D s t.0-

$AA tl )

&PI DE&TI Mr J G Keppler, Regional Administrator DEP&OF P

US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 c)

,9 Mr H R Denton D

Di. ector of Nuclear Reactor Regulation g

REgggygg Attn: Mr W P Haass, Chief

.g

~

Quality Assurance branch FEg 4g US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 9-fit 7

j Washington, DC 20555 1'

CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY -

p MIDLAND QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE g

FILE:

1.2 SERIAL

1h678

Reference:

J W Cook letter (Serial 15397) to Mr J G Keppler and Mr H R Denton. :

Quality Assurance Program Topical Report, CPC-1-A, revised Figure 8 from Policy 1. :

Quality Assurance Program Topical Report, CPC-1-A, revised Figure 10 from Policy 1. : Midland Project Quality Assurance Department i

j Procedure No A-lM.

Enclosure h: Midland Project Quality Assurance Organization Chart dated 1/22/82.

Submitted for your information are the above-noted enclosures which describe the reorganization of the Midland Project Office and of the Midland Project Quality Acsurance Department (MPQAD).

JAN 2 91982 gg M8228?N88sjh

_TEo/

J

2 This letter supersedes the referenced letter and reflects the organizational change and relationships as discussed at the NRC Region III Office on January 12,1982--ie, maintaining the position of Site Quality Assurance Superintendent within the Department.

Enclosures 1 and 2 describe the addition of B W Marguglio to the Midland Project Office and his line responsibilities for direct administration of MPQAD. Mr Marguglio vill be in residence at Midland and will thus be in a position to provide senior que.lity assurance management involvement in the site activities. describes the MPQAD organizational elements, their responsibilities,

and reporting relationships.

It includes the responsibility descriptions of the Director, Manager, Site QA Superintendent and the Assistant Manager -

Administration and Special Proj ects.

Enclosure h is the detailed organization chart which reflects current staffing.

." jig,sut//

JWC/lr

/

/

CC:

RJCook, NRC Resident Inspector -

Midland Nuclear Plant l

l l

l J

~

E MIDLAND PROJECT OFFICE y

at VICE PRESIDENT-PE&C h

PROJECT OFFICE MEMBERS **

r5<

$C A

o SITE MGT.

3 Z

^

MANAGER MANAGER M

SA Y kt D MANAGER SITE ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSI!!G MANAGER MANAGER - QA m

l

=

0 ASST. SITE h

MANAGER /

PLANT g

SUPERINTENDENT y

  • N0 QUALITY RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES OC O
    • AS OF THE DAY OF THIS DRAFT, THE PROJECT OFFICE MEMBERS CONSIST OF THE DIRECTOR <

EE22 E

ENVIRONMENTAL & QUALITY ASSURANCE, THE PROJECT MANAGER lND TWO EXECUTIVE MANAGERS Eh5{

y i

C*$*

e o

?

M o

aC[~

~

FIGURE 8 - MIDLAND PROJECT MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION.'-PRIOR TO FULL LOAD

9 8

MIDLAND PROJECT OFFICE VICE PRESIDENT - PE&C g

DIRECTOR - ENVIRONMENTAL j

& CUALITY ASSURANCE o

h r

Q MIDLAND PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE g

DIRECTOR, MANAGER C

Y g;

Z N

SITE QUALITY ASS'T MANAGER ASSURANCE ADMIN & SPECIAL 5

SUPERINTENDENT PROJECTS OO se>3 mO ON M

[

SECTION HEAD SECTION HEAD FLUIDS &

SECTION HEAD SECTION HEAD QUALITY n

ELECTRICAL

& IC QA HVAC QA

[,SmtjE MECHANICAL QA CIVIL QA e w m m m

GROUP NE$E 5

SUPERVISOR k

d k

ADMIN 1STRATIVE o 8gz E

QA MUE~

?

FIGURE 10 -

MIDLAND PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT ORGANIZATION i

I;

ENCLOSURE 3 MIDLAND PROJECT ggg l

l pg.g QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M ggggg DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 1 0F 7 REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 1.0 PURPOSE To define the Midland Project Quality Assurance (MPQA) Department organization and the responsibilities and authorities of each organizational segment.

2.0 SCOPE This Procedure applies to the MPQA Department.

3.0 DEFINITIONS None.

4.0 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 4.1 Quality Assurance Program Policy 1 4.2 Quality Assurance Program Procedure 1-1 (Volume II).

5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Department Organization and General Responsibilities The MPQA Department is responsible for setting Quality Assurance standards for design and construction of the Midland Nuclear Power Facility consis-tent with CP Co objectives, and for assuring the establishment and implementation of quality policies and procedures to meet these standards.

In performing their responsibilities, MPQA personnel have no responsibility for overall project cost and scheduling; have the authority and organiza-tional freedom to identify quality problems, initiate, recommend or provide corrective action and verify implementation of corrective action; and are independent from the individuals or groups performing the activities being inspected, tested or audited. Additional Quality Assurance-related activities, as given below, are assigned to MPQA for work performed either by CP Co or by principal suppliers, major subcontractors and subtier suppliers, or the activities may be done in conjunction with or be delegated to a principal supplier's corresponding organization. MPQA retains responsibility and authority for these activities and for assuring their adequate and timely accomplishment. The objective of the assignment of responsibilities and authorities to MPQA is to yield a total Quality Assurance Program resulting in the attainment of a facility which is de-signed in accordance with its design basis criteria and which is con-structed in accordance with its drawing and specification requirements.

The MPQA Department reports directly to the Midland Project Office as described in Reference Documents 4.1 and 4.2 above. The management consists of the Director, Environmental and Quality Assurance; the Manager; the Site Project Quality Assurance Superintendent and the Assistant bbnager-pr1080-0045a112

MIDLAND PROJECT 3 gyggg QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M

[

g pggg7 DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PACE 2 0F 7 Campany REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 Administration and Special Projects. Attachment A provides the MPQA organization and reporting relationships.

Following is a discussion of their responsibilities:

5.1.1 Director, Environmental & Quality Assurance The Director, E&QA is the most senior manager in the MPQA Department and a member of the Project Office. He has direct line respon-sibility for the MPQA Department.

5.1.2 Manager, MPQA The Manager, MPQA, reports to the Director, E&QA, and is responsible for the overall administration and management of the MPQA Department especially with regard to:

5.1.2.1 Planning, scheduling and resource allotment; 5.1.2.2 Coordinating CP Co reviews of conditions for reportability to the NRC under the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(c) and 10 CFR 21 and, as necessary, reporting to the NRC; 5.1.2.3 Providing direct supervision of the QA Services and HVAC QA Sections.

5.1.3 Site Project QA Superintendent The Site Project QA Superintendent reports to the Manager, MPQA and is responsible for:

5.1.3.1 Supervising the Fluids and Mechanical, Civil, Electrical and Instrumentation QA Sections; 5.1.3.2 Providing the primary MPQA Department interface with other CP Co departments and contractor organizations located at the site; 5.1.3.3 Coordinating activities in support of NRC site inspections; 5.1.3.4 Preparing responses to NRC site inspection reports.

5.1.4 Assistant Manager - Administration and Special Projects The Assistant Manager - Administration and Special Projects reports to the Manager, MPQA, and is responsible for:

pr1080-0045a112

- L' MIDLAND PROJECT Consumem QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M j

j pg.g ggggggy DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 3 0F 7 REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 5.1.4.1 Supervising the Administrative Group; 5.1.4.2 Providing staff assistance to the MPQA Department management; 5.1.4.3 Administering the department's personnel aquisition:

5.1.4.4 Representing the department in the Quality Improvement Program; 5.1.4.5 Preparing management information documents.

5.1.5 Within MPQA, there are five sections and an Administrative Group.

The five sections are:

Fluids and Mechanical Quality Assurance, Civil Quality Assurance, Electrical and Iustrumentation Quality Assurance, HVAC Quality Assurance, and Quality Assurance Services.

The four discipline oriented sections contain within them Quality Assurance Engineering (QAE) and Inspection, Examination and Test Verification (IE&TV Groups). The IE&TV Groups include NDE &

Welding, HVAC Inspection and Verification Activity Groups.

Following is a discussion of the responsibilities of each of the sections and the Administrative Group.

5.1.6 The QA Services Section and the Quality Assurance Engineering Groups are responsible for:

5.1.6.1 During the design concept activity for any CP Co design work, preparing the Project Quality Assurance Plan and assuring the Plan's timely issuance with the mutual concurrence of the organizations involved.

5.1.6.2 During the design activity, assuring that the established engineering procedures are followed through review and audit of the engineering function.

5.1.6.3 During the hardware and services procurement activities:

a.

Establishing or assuring the establishment of supplier quality assurance requirements;

  • b.

Performing preaward supplier evaluations for quality assurance and quality control activities;

  • c.

Preparing plans and procedures for procured item inspections, nondestructive examinations and tests; pr1080-0045a112

MIDLAND PROJECT gg.g OUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M pg.,,g7 DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 4 0F 7 gg,gg REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82

  • d.

Evaluating and, when specified, approving supplier quality assurance related documentation.

  • For CP (o direct procurements.

5.1.6.4 During the construction activity:

a.

Preparing plans and procedures for the inspections, nondestructive examinations and tests (other than checkout, preoperational, hot functional and major modification tests and functional tests for the establishment of in-service baselines) for installed items for use by Department personnel; b.

Reviewing and approving of Bechtel Quality Control Instructions and B&WCC Field Construction Procedures; c.

Participating in the resolution of hardware and systematic nonconformances and obtaining process corrective action.

5.1.6.5 During the checkout, preoperational, hot functional test activities:

a.

Reviewing the Project Testing Program Manual with respect to compliance with the Quality Assurance Program and annotating satisfactory completion of such review by a concurrence signature; b.

Auditing the individual preoperational, hot functional and functional in-service baseline test procedures to assure:

1.

The preparation of procedures in compliance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B; ANSI N45.2; Quality Assurance-related Regulatory Guides, codes and standards; and CP Co procedures; 2.

The establishment of quality-related prerequisites for the performance of each test; 3.

The adequacy of the data collection format and content relative to the needs of the Quality Assurance Program regarding quality records.

pr1080-0045a112

MIDLAND PROJECT f:f QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M j

DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 5 0F 7 gg REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 Preparing procedures for the inspection, nondestructive c.

examination and test verification of preventive and corrective maintenance activities.

5.1.6.6 Throughout all activities:

Assuring the maintenance and reporting of hardware a.

design quality and corrective action status; b.

Reviewing Principal Supplier reports of nonconformances for adequacy of their program implementation; Evaluating the implementation of the Quality Assurance c.

Program and recommending improvements; d.

Reviewing and concurring (or approving) of other Midland Procedures which are quality related; c.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 21 and J.55(e), making the determination as to the net d to report any noncon-formances and test deficiencies to the NRC; f.

Preparing 50.55(e) reports and responses to NRC Construction I&E Reports; g.

Issuing "Stop Work Orders," as appropriate; h.

Performing quality audits; i.

Certifying NDE personnel.

(This responsibility is vested in the QA Services Section only.)

5.1.7 The Inspection, Examination and Test Verification Groups are responsible for:

5.1.7.1 During the procurement and installation activities, performing source, receiving, fabrication, assembly and installation inspections, nondestructive examinations and tests (within the MPQA jurisdiction - other than checkouts, and preoperational, hot functional and functional tests for the establishment of in-service baselines) and determining the acceptability or nonacceptability of hardware items.

5.1.7.2 During preoperational and hot functional test activities, performing maintenance inspection, examination and tests (within the MPQA jurisdiction).

pr1080-0045a112

.us MIDLAND PROJECT CCP.sumers QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M

[

J pg;fg DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 6 0F 7 Company u

REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 5.1.7.3 Prior to the performance of the preoperational, hot functional tests, and the functional in-service baseline tests, directly verifying the accomplishment of quality-related construction prerequisites and signing off on each such prerequisite to signify:

a.

That there has been a turnover acceptance of the test unit (s);

b.

That each nonconformance and deficiency, both preturn-over and post-turnover, has been identified; c.

That each such nonconformance and deficiency has been adequately dispositioned.

5.1.7.4 At any time, prior to or during the nerformance of the checkout, preoperational, hot fpactional tests, and functional in-service baseline tests, auditiig compliance with other prerequisites, signifying the prerequisites actually audited by the application of a QA signature for each such prerequisite.

5.1.7.5 During the performance of the checkout, preoperational, hot functional tests, and functional in-service baseline tests, evaluating compliance with test procedures on an audit and surveillance basis, signifying the test procedural steps actually audited and surveilled by the application of QA signatures adjacent to these steps.

5.1.7.6 During the performance of the preoperational, hot func-tional tests, and functional baseline tests, contributing to the identification of plant quality status by trans-mitting MPQA-originated NCRs to the testing organization for their incorporation into the overall plant status accounting system.

5.1.7.7 Throughout the construction activities:

Issuing "Stop Work Orders," as appropriate; a.

b.

Making the initial determination as to the need to re-port any nonconformances and test deficiencies to the NRC; c.

Identifying inspection and examination problems and test problems within MPQA's test jurisdiction, and causing their timely and adequate correction; pr1080-0045a112

MIDLAND PROJECT h

QUALITY ASSURANCE PROC NO A-1M j

q DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE PAGE 7 0F 7 gggy REVISION 3 ORGANIZATION DATE 2/1/82 d.

Assuring that nonconforming items identified on CP Co NCRs are properly dispositioned; e.

Evaluating the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program and recommending improvements; f.

Assuring effectiveness of site principal and subtier primary quality control activities and conformance of all construction and installation activities to the established Program Procedures through audit and over-inspection.

5.1.7.8 Certifying MPQA personnel to perform inspection and test.

5.1.8 The Administration Group is responsible for:

5.1.8.1 Performing departmental administrative functions, especially with regard to department reports and records.

l 5.1.8.2 Coordinating departmental quality assurance education, training and indoctrination.

5.1.8.3 Maintaining systems to trend quality data to identify adverse repetitive quality conditions.

5.1.8.4 Maintaining tracking systems of quality open items.

5.1.8.5 Participating in audits.

l

{

pr1080-0045a112

O

=

E-zo' n1

>0Ny 9.

3 OC>h< >a g0m

%O 2

>g 8

E.%

%S oM -

8 O S>:

zwm mUCDm n

Q."aE

%d$Oy s

%it sRm o

s2O 1

2 NOS P

P S

A E

IE U

U T:

Q Q

TI O

O Lf AE AT R

R I

C C

CI G

G CN A

A IV P!

EG FI V

V H

H IT P

P SS RC S

S S

EA N

N A

V I

I

~

LA S

S IS E

T CE LN C

ES AE PS I

IM SE VR CN C

E EG

&O S

E PI R

SS EP

[

S D

AQ A

N E

C N

N A

O R

I E

U T

C S

A I

S Z

F C

A I

F NS O

EA IT N

N Y

MC O

A PQ T

I G

T CE AJ T

R I

C TE L

R R

O A

C E

N A

O E

R R

J E -

U T

G P

T T

O D

R I

G C

A R

S N

R I

E N

GL I

E P

S O R

A MA N

M ET T

T I

M I

D R C C

D M

R I

N P E E

TC D

A A

R J

. E A

P I

O 5P L

E E

C C D R

3S D

I I

P g

M V

E D

C N

N A

A L

R D

SU I

M S

G S

A l

N T

A I

LN Y

\\

R V

AE T

E T

IM I

C' L

E E G' A

I PI U

I G

SS Q

N S

E A

TC E

JOR P

D NA

~

L T

D Y

N I

G M

T E

N I

I L

R V

A E

T U

l Q

N E

I I

E G

T N

I E

S US

~

~

A G

Q G

N N

I I

D A

R V

L E

T E

'n E

l I

GN E

E E

D M

N j

j i1 d

T*

4 ENCLOSURE 4 e

9-MIDLAND 7ptJfc SPP!tT TICE FRESIEIrr PEtt J W Coot OfREcron,Ervacuperrst AND QUALITT A33UHANCE B W Nerguglie wrevien ypog CT SIAE.1TT A53JBASCI errarMErr DDRCTOR C-4 B W Marsuslie C-8 9 Areoute (See'y) 3lAsaGER C4 W 5 Stre C4

& Sletates (See'y)

PGAE S4 N A Dietrset

  1. M L Peterace fSee't) l 81TI retALITY A88'T MABMS neemaerf AEsGI 6 5PECIAL surspir?>ts?

Ftim e.$

N & Curiaed (3/1)

C-8 D N Tareaull l

I l

l l

FIAIIDS & sERAs: CAL cIW'. ' A r2.r. y:CAI./ Ib! u GA SDVIII.3 FAC iA GA

=

SETICE IEAD SECTICE EEAD SICTICE EEAD SECTICI EEAD SECTION EEAD C-4 D g Iore C4 N J Teneetter

'C4 J L wooe+

C.S I F Leonart

?*4 W Aserter C-3 E A111eos (S*e'71 e

ifvac.I GA D3!.NTTPLe3 aA ry p t,y g 2

A E3;;TIDI3'1 MJ37A?IM CESIII M We 9

,gpgyy g 3gg stJPgpTISCR

  • 4 N[,heA SJPERTISCR CROUP sL?DVISOE SUPDMSCg

..g 3 *arsee C.s t I whitater 54 J A noreen C-A G B Endle C4 m gutterfield

.g I t, seer a34 g Just (See'y)

'o e4 T I. foung C8 9,Sete 88 g C Eirsel C-C-3 J Dawson 6-4 D 3 tela g-=

3 go,,

,C-3 C M C,a,rlia C.

A cort

, meu erriae o

CAC eo Am. u.

    • 4 u A Torderose
  • 4 J Tateaua C4 Chw C*5 E EaFee go-8 I NcCsa,le C-g T Nese11 79-4 N Kirkland e4 g gg g g ;y C.3 C Thoepeam 54 L Sutkva e.5 34 3 Netta

,I a g y 11Arv SL7pv!SOR 34 g g,,g, vg;r;;A;;;a 38 e i Teve RJFDTISCR og g g pgeb,,

c'T!? 3 sfrER,TISCR t

te.ei t

-a e t ma C

-A D==

,J,pM3C,

,,,g g g g g,,

3-4 J C $ bat 16C Creup e.g 3gwar ta Ss F Schulae18te,

  • .s C 3 gagneur
  • -6

? E Mee M**dl*

D.S 0 t Anderose

  • -8 3 Palmer e-g D C tendriz e-4 J Dittentir e.8 A Kuss
  1. -S 7 Pucet C-4 8 Punala e.g R A Eleojosa SPEC *AI AJ31GMS I g,g g y gu,,g,seg,,,,g

[

C4 A E Saarree Electrieal Creep C.g D A satt itmedi st E 6 *CI53 e.g a ;ocarase e.g N Leech glypV!Sgg

  1. -8 E S Surke st.K A sFICIAI.

USP. WP !

C-4 2 8 5'her yRTISSES SJPDTISCR C.e e D terie guyggvISCS

    • 8 R V " tiler 3-s T a Charette C4 3 E. Wood *

=

33 9 gestem e.g D C Soltaeus SPEcIAL Ass:mrs I C4 s e carena

  • -8 J Suas e.g M w tear.

e 34 T E sobressatae C-8 F 4 Imde

  • .8 J Orr Ce a L atency C. CPCs 3

d I*s C W e. Castract Elaployee g. $1te SL7pv!SCS J. *ecteos

  1. -8 J f. 2immeea Ata Attor e.S J Callivaa
  • . DLal Cesacity
  • .s 3 Sameere f. Assia18trettee support e.8 D umaa 3 4 en Loma
  • .S 0 morgsa (Esserted Reporttag Cate) e.3 R Thurston T. Teeporary
  • 4 T Tate Sevised 1/22/82 15 FECIAL A;;:nZ2 [ m e-g [ s E 3anale

[