ML20040E277
| ML20040E277 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/28/1982 |
| From: | Cressman M, Cummings L, Hare J AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202040120 | |
| Download: ML20040E277 (3) | |
Text
. _ _ _
M 25.5!Ed1..5. 0-2..8.._7,
... m January la,.1982_
-g3 Uttice of the Secretary U.S.
Nuclear Hegulatory Commission
'82 JM 28 P2:41 Washington, D.C.
205S5 hhg, g:
He: Docket No. 50-289 9
EhANCF
- j,,
8 ifry
. '] % gOg 1
'O Dedr NRC:
t r h N, f g% g a, [g 78g As a Pennsylvania resident who lives downwind gj 77 Three Mile Island, 1 strongly protest the decision by the
'O 4 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board ahicn recommends that s
Hetropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor No 'i atx@ g
/
'IMI.
I believe there are meny reasons wny restart of IMI-l should not be permitted at this time:
A method of paying ior the cl,edn-up of THi-2 nas not even been agreed to and the clean-up itself has hardly begun.
The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knows what proolems may arise. I believe the clean-up of TM1-2 should be substantially complete before another reactor -- TM1-1 -- is dllowed to operate on the sate site.
The investigation of cneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at TML has not ueen completed. Certainly this should be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate dt TM1.
'lhe courts nave not had d chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress whicn a restart would cause for residents in the immediate vicin,ity of 'I M I. They have a right to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
An adequate evacuation plan for the ENTIRE hazaro drea around TM1 has yet to be prepared and accepted. 1his must include at least a 25-mile radius.
I also reject the ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GPU Nuclear are qualitied to operate a nuclear reactor. They told us tne accident couldn't nappen, tnen covered it up wnile it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to believe them When tney sdy it Won't udppen dQain?
I urge tne Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reject the ASLO recommendation. Please order that IF1-1 remain closed until ALL of the above proolems dre resolved.
y D
Sincerely, 4N I
D " # "" 53 *CNS LOL L\\
8202040120 820128 PDR ADOCK 05000289 H
PDR C.cond' '==ppx Ccuwwa gp ga pgyg
)
.p
' 'Q~ ?'i.?.5,.\\.. 5.1.. s..A.~Th'
.{..-.
0.
1E: =
aanuary 3, 19 9
,s-eg
'81 JNI 28 P2:41 Uttice of the Secretary a
i E/j,E U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission M
(
ty #[ gg E
O FgO Washington, D.C.
20555 CFFI v
GCCF a
j c.
k g g*,
He: Docket No. 50-289
'A
/
3
,xf
. y Dedr NRC:
As a Pennsylvania resident who lives downwind from Three Mile Islano, I strongly protest the decision by the M ic Safety and Licensing Board ahicn recommends tnat detropolitan Edison Co. De allowed to restart reactor No. 1 at
'I M I.
I believe there are mdny reasons wny restart of IM1-1 should not be permitted at this time:
_ A method of paying for the clean-up of THI-2 nas not even been agreed to dnd the clean-up itself has ndrdly begun.
The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Kno'es what proolems may arise. I believe tne cledn-up of TMI-2 should be substantielly complete before anotner reactor -- TM1-1 -- is dllowed to operate on the same site.
The investigation o1 cneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at.TM1 has not oeen completed. Certainly this should be entirely cleared up Detore any reactor is dllowed to operate dt Thl.
'lhe courts nave not had a chance to rule oT the issue of the psychologicdl stress unicn a restart would cause tor residents in the immediate vicinity of 1MI. They nave a right to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
_ An adequate evdcudtion plan for the ENTlRE hazarc drea around TMl has yet to De prepared and accepted. Ihis must D bb3 5
f include at least d 25-mile Iddius.
/ Q l
I also reject the ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GPU Nuclear are qualitied to operate a nuclear redctor. They told us tne accident couldn't nappen, Enen covered it up wn11e it was nappening. And now 'me're supposed to believe them When tney say it Won't hdppen dyaln?
the touclear Regulatory Commission to reject the ASLB I urge recomme_n h. Please order that 1H1-1 remain closea until ALL
~ot the above proolems are resolveo.*
j l
7o047 tnt-FA rWJ 86 M M Sincerely, p 7 A-rJO 7tw A' AlkH=7tL-
, (
bl$ ASTER t h) G l/J h!A N k & &
(l k I A) DA C-u,11 am i 2
^3 V -l -
as-z. ict +-
s'-
Po MK PLA ^) r - 6 ^) Tnt 2-to M#ERc h
h7 M //e A v>t,
A
/ f f o A.
T
- ~ ~
i FMIET r;3 m-,
PROD.& UT$N.,h[k{'
1982 January.
/,9 a
Uttice of the Secretary
'82 JMl 28 P2:41 sy E
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ig/
, /Q7s Washington, D.C.
20555 11
/O' V/k G
M#4 t?
D 1
h.f~(J2;, q')?Cii U.-
He: Docket No. 50-289
'b.RU V
. O f'
~'
- 4k g
Uear NRC:
As a pennsylvania resident who 11Ves downwind trom N
Three Mile Island, I strongly protest the decision by the Atomic Safety and.bicensing Board ahicn recommends that i4etropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor No. 1 at 1M1.
restart of TMl-1 I believe there are many reasons wny should not be permitted at this time:
A method of paying for the clean-up of THI-2 has not even been agreed to and the clean-up itselt has hardly begun.
who Knows what is an entirely new process, and The clean-up 1 believe tne clean-up of TMI-2 should be proolems may arise.
-- is substantially complete betore another reactor -- TM1-1 allowed to operate on the same site.
investigation of cneating on qualification tests'
_ The Deen completed. Certainly IMI has not by reactor operators at this should be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate at Thl.
_ 1he courts nave not had a chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress whicn a restart would cause tor IMI. They have a right residents in the immediate vicinity of to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
_ An adequate evacuation plan for tne ENTlRE hazard drea arOund TMl has yet to De prepared and accepted. lhis must include at least a 25-mile radius.
the ASLB contention tnat Met-Ed and GPU I also reject to operate a nuclear reactor. They told Nuclear are qualitied I
us tne accident couldn't n appen, tnen covered it up.wnile it to believe them when tney was nappening. And now we're. supposed say it won't happen again?
the ASLu urce the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to-reject I
1H1-1 remain closed until ALL recommendation. Please order tnat of the above proolems are resolved.
HME
()b e:s Sincerely,
\\
R\\
/ 6 yg C.
f 4 44-7 A lle.~k, PA.
u n sons s