ML20040D904
| ML20040D904 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 01/27/1982 |
| From: | Hammel M, Rodarmor B AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8202020378 | |
| Download: ML20040D904 (3) | |
Text
-
.~
-~
BRUCE C. RODARMOR sales representative DCJ BOX 194-A BELLEVILLE, PA.17004
'82 N "302 I 'S'/,(p; (717) 935-2642 0FFler '
FUEL CRISIS li;cKE..l INCORPORATED 2/
nELONED
(%
pg,l ' 1982>
January 23rd, 1982
\\
w r='
uwww$
.hdOD. & UTik. FAC.,
4x
('
b Dear Mr. Palladino; After being burned once, why should we expose ourselves to another risk ? I am very much against the operating of TMI-1. I live in a cabin that 1 used to come to as a child from New York City, and I own 90 acres of beautiful mountainside, which also includes ny watershed. It is an earthly paradise, but with thoughts of the restart of TMI-1, this security, this inner peace will be greatly threatened and I will not feel comfortable here. Then I think of all the people who live in sicht of TMI - how much they have suffered.
Tours Truly, C.
Bruce C. Rodamor s
}
O 8202020378 820127 PDRADOCK05000g H
,cunnvL FUEL TREATMENTS
r" l*
N
, _~ y :( WiMDtK &
PROD.& UTIL FA _
January 2 2, 1"9 5 2
~~
Uttice of the Secretdry O
- M E N M 2 U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commi f
f J
Washington, D.C.
20555 h
S RGC U~'
~,,[
I EO I
He: Docket No. 50-289 p
L hT:
IS825.y
Dear NBC:
1 ((
/
s
/:/
s t r o n g l y p rV t e s ty,1,1;V,e s d o w nw ind As a Pennsylvania res'dentswno from
.e/ decision oy the Three Mile Island, 1 Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 7an en recommends tnat Metropolitan Edison Co. be allowed to restart reactor No. 1 at 1M1.
I believe there are meny reasons wny restart of IM1-1 should not be permitted et this time:
A method of paying for the clean-up of THi-2 has not even been agreed to end the clean-up itself has ndrdly begun.
The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knoes what proolems may arise. 1 believe the cledn-up of TMI-2 s.nould be
-- is substantidlly complete betore another reactor -- TML-1 dllowed to operate on the same site.
The investigation of cneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at TML has not ueen completed. Certainly this snould be entirely cleared up before any reactor is dilowed to operate et T81.
The courts nave not had,d chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress whicn a restart would cause for residents in the immediate Vicinity of 1Hl. They have a right to be heard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
. An adequate evdcuation plan for the ENTIRE hazdro drea dround TM1 nas yet to oe prepared and accepted. 1his must include at least a 25-alle rddlus.
I also reject tne ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GPU Nuclear are qua11 tied to operate a nuclear reactor. They told us tne accident couldn't n appen, tnen covered it up wn11e it was nappening. And now^ we're.supposeo to believe them when they sdy it WOR't hdppen dQain?
I urge tne Nuclear Hegulatory Commission to reject the ASLB recommendation. Please order tnat 1H1-1 remain closec until ALL Q3 of the doove proolems are resolved.
s Sincerely,
/Q au 1397 eadowbrook Lane Lebanon, PA 17042
~ Ui.7 M'fngg PSCD a UTIL FAC,"'"""==
January-1982 Uttice of the Secretary i
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 12 Jilli 27 P3:33 Washington, D.C. 20555 cj.M N\\
I He: Docket No. 50-289 Cf.5f 3
c:,
s cy p
' ' EC ;g% N M Scif 2
Ur FE k-fig B2 S
fqg2
Dear NRC:
M Q w.-1 A.
l As a pennsylvanta resident wno lives downwind if ate i;prNgs, Three Mile Island, I strongly protest the decision by th *
,,(s' l
Atomic safety and Licensing BoarJ ahlen recommends that
' g, Metropolitan Edison Co. De allowed to restart reactor No. 1
't TMie I believe there are many reasons wny restart of IMI-1 t
should not be permitted et this time
. A method of paying for tne clean-up of THI-2 nas not even been agreed to and the clean-up itselt has nardly begun.
The clean-up is an entirely new process, and who Knows what prootems may arise. 1 believe tne clean-up of TMI-2 snould be substantidtly complete before another reactor -- TM1-1 -- is dltowed to operate on the same site.
_ The investigation of eneating on qualification tests by reactor operators at IMI has not oeen completed. Certainly this snould be entirely cleared up betore any reactor is allowed to operate dt TMI.
. The courts nave not nad e chance to rule on the issue of the psychological stress unien a restart would cause tor residents in the immediate vicinity ot IMI. They have a right to be neard before Met-Ed and the NHC pre-empt their case.
. An adequate evacuation plan for the ENT1RE hazdro dfea around TMI has yet to be prepared and accepted. lhis must include at least a 25-alle redius.
I also reject the ASLB contention that Met-Ed and GpU Nuclear are qua11 tied to operate a nucledr reactor. They told us tne accident couldn't nappen, Enen covered it up wn11e it was nappening. And now we're.supposeo to believe them when they say it won't nappen aq'ain?
I urce the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to reject the ASLB recommendation. please order that 181-1 remain closed until ALL of the above proolems are resolved.
9507 s
sincerely,
//W//
u,/w y
/ Y )
,(./l s-
-' O W~ N NO/f'
- - -,