ML20040D151
| ML20040D151 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 12/30/1981 |
| From: | Scarano R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS) |
| To: | Ramsey R ENERGY, DEPT. OF |
| References | |
| REF-WM-39 NUDOCS 8201300330 | |
| Download: ML20040D151 (7) | |
Text
__
Re/ tun'lD: U2MUIE %I-k5 1.
DISTRIBIKI0th WM - 3 9
- i
^
WJR S/F DEC 3 0 1981 muR W/F Pg
) CUR R/F WM-39/PDR/WS/81/12/22/-
W R/F WSSR/F WSHAFFER KKALMAN N IN WMUR:WMS A
BFISHER-go WM-39, PDR JLINEHAN
1dercble overlapping in the individus1 site projset schedules since we must l
h10to the entire progran im a seven-year time period. Thus, we feel that some l
rrctanding is required regarding concurrence times when pero than one document Meing reviewed.
ess e l * >*
l comments to the individual time requirements in your Attachment I are ine4cJed
~
F emenesuee.
The INTRA Project Office is the interface point for all items, 9
UtStee4[.or which 00F/HQS is responsible.
Geould be noted that we plan on conducting and completing the DOE internal review M101 with the NRC review of documents.
We' feel this to the most bient use of the project's limited time period.
Sincerely.
Richard H. Campbell, Project Manager un.a..........
i.- - -
Enclesute q{f#$
000 Cossmenta_en MRC Time Intervals, 4
1.
Concur in executed Cooperative Agreement:
3 weeks ni9 iten should be expanded into two interface points:
(1)'
aeview and emunent on proposed Cooperative Agreement:
3 weeks (2)
Concur in execsted Cooperative Agreement:
3 weeks 2.
Revlow/ concur in DEIS (Processing Site):
6 weeks This is acceptabic.
H ere will be a four-week per3od for incorporating cfosages into the document that will follw the receipt of the comunts.
3.
Review / concur in PEIS (Processing Site):
4 weeks 21s is acceptable.
4.
Review / concur in Final EA (Processing Site): 6 weeks Cance the NRC will review And concur in RACPs and RAPu, the need to officially review EAs is not apparent. 1hus, while the draft and finst EAs will be 1
l trsosaitted to the NBC, formal review and concurrence by the MRC of the EAs chould not be included in D02/NRC interface points.
l S.
Review / concur in Final Remedial Action Plan (Processing site) 4 weeks i
his is acceptable.
O.
Review / concur in Final REA (unusually significent vicinity property):
6 weeks since the size and scope of RDAs will be limited; i.e., it might consist of 24 pages including about 12 enginscring drawings; we feel that 2 weeks should
~
be sufficient to review the Final REA.
l E
M 7.'
Rytiw/ concur in Remedial Action Certification (Unusually significant vietnity property):
a weeks ne cert!floation document is a DOE /lqs document, and thus the Project office has no oossment on this item.
C.
arview and concur in repository site licenac application:
16 weeks his is acceptable (please note that we have added the words "and concur in repository").
D.
Revio ared concur in Sita Completion Report:
4 weeks Dis item has' been added to your list.
A Site Completion Report will be developed for each processing site and vicinity property that has undergone remedial action.
__