ML20040D047
| ML20040D047 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 01/11/1982 |
| From: | Albert W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040D046 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-508-81-19, NUDOCS 8201290528 | |
| Download: ML20040D047 (2) | |
Text
'
t 2;
APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Washington Public Power Supply System Docket No. 50-508 P. O. Box 1223 Construction Permit No.
Elma, Washington 98541 CPPR-154 As a result of the inspection conducted on November 1-30, 1981 and in accordance with the Interim Enforcement Policy, 45 FR 66754 (October 7, 1980), the following violation was identified:
A.
10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V states in part: " Activities affecting quality shall be... accomplished in accordance with...
procedures..." A required quality affecting activity is defined by Criterion VIII of Appendix B which states in part that".. measures shall assure that identification of the item is maintained by heat number, part number, serial number or other appropriate means".
Section 17.2.8 of the WNP 3-5 PSAR in turn states that, "The Ebasco Quality Program requires that identification and traceability during construction be maintained when required by code, standard or specification." The governing specifications established by Ebasco for control of weld filler materials are 884-WA-80, 884-WB-80 and 884-WC-80. Section 5.2 of each of these specifications requires the use of Ebasco approved procedures for weld filler material identification and control. The approved procedure utilized by the Morrison-Knudsen Co. under their joint venturc ' contract No. 3240-224 is FWP 500N, titled Filler Metal Procurement and Control.
Contrary to the above requirements, an NRC examination of this subject on November 27, 28 and 30,1981, tound that certain provisions of procedure FWP 500N were not being properly implemented as listed below:
1.
Section 7.3.1 requires the use of form QA-034 for the requisition of weld filler materials from the warehouse and specifies three copy distribution to the welding engineer, warehouse and QA records. Contrary to this, it was found that only two copies were used with distribution to QA records and field wire rooms.
2.
Section 7.4.1 requires that an approved access list be posted in each field wire room. Contrary to this, the field wire room in the west laydown area serving the pipe fabrication shop (west wire room) had out-of-date lists posted as evidenced by entry of personnel who were not on the list but performed the function of those who were listed.
9201290528 820111 PDR ADOCK 05000509 G
r e
. ~
- 3.
Section 7.4.4 requires that bare wire and consumable inserts be kept dry and packaged until required for issue. Contrary to this, it was noted that a coil of bare wire was not packaged and that a coffee urn was in use near the bare wire storage in the west wire room.
4.
Section 7.4.6 requires that all spooled wire for the GTAW process shall be placed on pallets or shelves. Contrary to this, two stacks of spooled wire were found on top of sealed cans of coated electrodes in the west wire room, f
5.
Section 7.4.8 requires that the oven or slot in the oven be labeled witii the applicable infomation for the material being stored.
Contrary to th!.s. a label. on the outside of one oven of the west wire room belonged on another oven and one oven
.with two types _of weld electrodes did not have slot identifi-cation.
-6.
' Section.7.5.2 requires that a pink copy of form QA-35 (rod withdrawal authorization) accompany each portable container.
Contrary _to this, it was found that the west wire room would use a single-form wnen both coated and bare filler wires were issued to.a single welder. Therefore one container could not meet the requirement.
This was specifically noted with regard fo'an issue of E70S-2 wire to welder T-16 on November 30, 1981 from the west wire room.
7.-
Section 7.4.11 requires that all GTAW welding wire be issued in capped containers. Contrmj to this, GTAW weld wire issued for welder T-16 cn November 30th did not have a cap on the container.
This is a Severity Level V violation applicable to Unit 3 only.
Pursuanttotheprovisionsof15CFR2.201,WashingtonPublicPower Supply System is hereby required to submit to this office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including: (1)' the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective. steps which will be taken to avcid further items of noncompliance; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Under the authority of Section 182 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, this response shall be submitted under oath or affirmation. Consideration may be given to extending your response time for good cause shown.
g{j))[g ygg JM 1 1 1932 Date William G.j Albert Sr. Resident Inspector i