ML20040C096
| ML20040C096 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 01/19/1982 |
| From: | Ahrens P, Brown R MAINE, STATE OF |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8201270263 | |
| Download: ML20040C096 (2) | |
Text
.
o 00&E T..r r nw January 19, 1982
'82 JM 25 P3:19 LFC CCCQ ; J.rt;[s?
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA U' ' a &
w NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
+
RECEtyyn f
- 'JAN261982w S
- EWhaEtaar '.
BEFORE Tile A'IOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARQ
~%
i 4
4 In the Matter of
)
s
')
LE MAINE YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY
)
Docket No. 5 0-30 9-O L A
)
(Spent Fuel (Maine Yankee Atomic Power Station)
)
MOTION FOR PREHEARING CONFERENCE On October 26, 1981, the State of Maine filed a formal request to the Board to issue a notice and order scheduling a second prehearing conference.
On December 30, 1981, the Board denied the State's request, noting "no need is seen at this time for scheduling another prehearing conference."
The State hereby renews its request for a second prehearing conference.
The prehearing conference held on August 11, 1981 was scheduled pursuant to Board Order dated June 22, 1981 and 10 CFR Part 2.751(a).
The purposes of such a prehearing conference, according to S2.751(a), are (1) to permit identification of the key issues in the proceeding; ( 2) to take any steps necessary for further identification of the issues; (3) to consider all intervention petitions to allow the
{)$CiS presiding officer to make such preliminary or final 5
determination as to the parties to the proceeding, as may be
/ D appropriate; and (4) to establish a schedule for further 8201270263 820119 PDR ADOCK 05000309 C
actions in the proceeding.
According to the August 24, 1981 Prehearing Conference Order and the transcript of the proceeding, the only matters taken up by the Board during the first prehearing conference involved the admissibility of the contentions filed by the State and Sensible Maine Power, and since then amended.
Additional persons spoke and requested to intervene.
No agreement concerning discovery schedules could be agreed upon in light of the opposition of the' Licensee and the NRC Staff to all of the State's contentions.
The State of Maine respectfully suggests that a second prehearing conference is necessary to carry out all the purposes outlined in S2.751(a).
Therefore the State again requests that the Board schedule a second prehearing conference to consider the amended contentions already filed, the objections to the contentions, the responses to the objections and other matters deemed appropriate pursuant to S2.751(a).
Respectfully submitted, Dated: January 19, 1982 JAMES E. TIERNEY
~ Attorney G9neral
'l)j f;/
l RUFUS E. BROWN De'puty Attorney General 2
PHILIf AHR2NS Assistant Attorney General