ML20040B799
| ML20040B799 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/04/1982 |
| From: | Mcneill W, Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20040B781 | List: |
| References | |
| REF-QA-99900217 NUDOCS 8201260419 | |
| Download: ML20040B799 (6) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _
U"U#
U WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT HUNT VALLEY, MARYLAND REPORT NO.: 99900217/81-02 INSPECTION DATE(S):
11/16-19/81 INSPECTION Oh SITE HOURS:
28 CORRESPONDFNCE ADDRESS: Westinghouse Electric Corporation Instrumentation Department ATTN:
Mr. J. F. Heins, General Manager 1111 Schilling Road Hunt Valley, MD 21031 ORGANIZATION CONTACT:
Mr. R. W. Lee, Product Assurance Manager TELEPHONE:
(301) 667-5532 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT: Electronic components and controls.
NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVITY: About 75% of manufacturing is commercial nuclear work.
Solid State Protection Systems, Nuclear Instrumentation Systems, Digital Rod Position Indication Systems, Reactor and Containment Vessel Level Monitoring Systems, and Technical Support Centers are some of the product lir,es.
g g
/-Y -Q ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:
W.MiMfNei11,ComppdentsSection(CS)
Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):
1
_ /f bbEd[
bc/%p l-4-FZ APPROVED BY:
U. Potapovs, Acting Chier, C; Date l
lNSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:
A.
BASES:
10 CFR Part 50, Appendix 8.
8.
SCOPE:
Nonconformances and corrective action; calibration; procurement controls; and status of previous inspection findings.
pcIrvna OBIGIUAL CerttN ed BY 8201260419 820106 PDR QA999 EMVWEST 99900217 PDR
ORGANIZ'ATION: UESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT HUNT VAiLEY, MARVLAND REPORT NO.: 99900217/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 2 of 3 A.
VIOLATIONS:
None B.
NONCONFORMANCES:
1.
Contrary to the QA Manual, Section 14.1 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, two Inspection Control Tags were found with incorrect and missing information.
2.
Contrary to the QA Manual, Section 7.1, and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Dart 50, two Corrective Action Requests (CARS) for vendor nonconformances were either not initiated or were voided.
3.
Contrary to the QA Manual, Section 8.2 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, three cases were found where defects were not logged or were logged incorrectly.
4.
Contrary i.o the QA Manual, Section 3.6 and Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50, independent verification of vendor test results has not been performed for the last four months.
C.
UNRESOLVED ITEMS:
None l
0.
STATUS OF PREVIOUS INSPECTION FINDINGS:
1 1.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01): A method of design change verification was used which was not described in Quality System
~
Requirements.
The forms used have been modified to remove the method in question.
The design control procedure will be revised to reflect this change.
A review of verification activities found no further problems.
2.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01):
Inspection Control Tags did not have the latest revision of applicable drawings and initials of personnel.
Instruction classes were held for personnel.
A review of Inspection Control Tags found no further problems in this specific area, hcwever, another nonconformance was identified in this area.
3.
(Closed) Nonconformance (81-01):
A change to a drawing in use was not properly documented.
Instruction classes were held for personnel.
A review of drawings found in use in the shop found no further problems.
ORGANIZATION:
UESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, INSTRUMENTATION DEPARTMENT HUNT VALLEY. MARVLAND 2 ORT NO.: 99900217/81-02 INSPECTION RESULTS:
PAGE 3 of 3 i
E.
OTHER FINIDNGS OR COMMENTS:
i 1.
Nonconformances and Corrective Action - Tne Material Review Board (MRB) activities for the past six months was reviewed.
This included 21 reports.
The review, disposition, and documentation of nonconformances followed procedures.
Corrective action was documented for internal activities, however,a nonconformance was identified in this area regarding vendor corrective action.
During this timeframe eight Material Rejection Notices had been dispositioned by MRB with vendor CARS.
Defects and quality trends were summarized and reported.
Weekly Defect Summary and Inspection Submittal and Discrepancy Records were reviewed.
Hardware in the shop was reviewed for proper identification of defects.
One nonconformance was I
identified in this area.
2.
Calibration - Sixteen instruments and 10 crimping tools were inspected.
Instruments and tools were found to be labeled properly.
Records and procedures were found which established the acceptance limits, schedules, and results of calibration.
3.
Procurement Controls - The purchase order for three components for the 2
Solid State Protection Systems were reviewed in detail.
- Cabinets, relays, and power supplies were the items on these purchase orders.
The use of the Approved Vendor List, vendor evaluation and history was verified to follow the approved procedures.
Vendor history files which include Survey Reports, Audit Checklists, Source Reports, Vendor Qualftf Rating System, Detail Reports, Questionable Vendor Reports, and Certified Vendors Reports were inspected.
In this area one nonconformance was identified.
An open item for follow up during a later inspection was also identified.
The vendor certifica-tion and test data could not be found for some Class 1E power supplies on purchase order 02D-ASP 87737 which were inspected on April 25, 1981.
i
msens cm. =
~
MN n/u,-i 9/Fl c=,cany c, 3, h&M;_Q acecnecer-no.
si-oz-
- ns m I d 3
. tge
'IAE(21esa :sm)
,... it 21e se :s-m cyrgnT :- cNi r,esa :sm) h.o e9Voeb Q R
- Enc, Cs).u s. Dew k L.AN5L Peat.
F06 Qx LW'dy 6:c!J
?> se T2. t>J. L.Ef:
S g kg,sugAccA CM. t$16K Tzcgaf3 Mr.g.
h M. UI LSo /d Q f. E'ag,.
T E ESAnGM LQG Sup&
1 OLLEju
- 22. E.
T a
UE 6 A*tEt (A l.A6 / #
a c. 5TE4 60S l
GAL. LAG SUPW I
3 Lif0 M G EM.
0 G.
f$ fasc.4 PG 6 tL.14U64ES P(M. 6 -
W. TAra LotJ
- Eoc, b.
V I
i l
I I
I I
I l
I I
I i
1
.i i
i l
m U;k T
guf '
t 2
eFi i:
1i l
tu!i ii.
111-i i,
u <
i i <
t ss,
_==-
I
~~d;
$$C N
Y S k
.L
-k'hj$$52i M
' hs jilil i
g
.-~-.
%,s s
s r
i
\\
y C
7 g
O' I, W-k O
(
j e
jm
.i g g a'
s e
e3 m
E t
i o
1 e
=
u 1%
y t
u r a si EM i 8[
U 4..%
a 7
e i _.!;
' 4 e
+
E w
v J
d E
g $s'
(
a a
5 g
a
, e g
5, D
%pM w.,
o h
C O O
S si E
- -2
.~2 1 K* %ld e u
+ '2 o s=
a tc e 4o f
F o
2 m
.e
)A lj $
5 5 g 5
22.
a 0
555.s 1
[
$nW,delbstM@j J i a s u
n e
n ~
Q\\
l E
3.-
I $$!
t/) Nw r N r-P 9 mA
- M D M" l
i
~
l TRaar
,2 is&ts j!h p >
4 5W44 0
y[
i
}
%6 tc,9 A 5 d
~
~
E 5
3
tI i
% 'i 4
3
&L:
i l
l cr
- I 5
2 gn
=_.-
kjg w
\\
l I
_se-T ~ y;
$$~
k lT$$N N 5
~
=
i r r e
e ~,,
y f-T y p E E 5 *" 5 m
6 O
M N
l l
3
,~
Odddd v1 d.J v) v t/)
er t
o p'
kl&
.h g'z r.m
=
E }
8 E,
,4 w
=
o
='
I U
$ r3 N
,c b,
1' lc e
I il 3
5 L
~
$l d,
M E
y r
a e
s J
4)
V d -4*'
[
tr
\\0 r
i ge 0
I!
N s=
o
.s 53h
. ek
! Eo e
ii
's d
,d 2.53s i
.) j h p 2 7 7 6p \\;.O.
==~=e r
1 l
'l
'd 3
ae-O g
N p.
-it82 1l pm
\\
\\
N. P 7 'A S \\
\\
l 54dd4
$3 w
~
l-M. MI M M" m t
I e
e
.c O