ML20040B665
| ML20040B665 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/31/1981 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | |
| References | |
| NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-V13, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-V13, NUDOCS 8201260299 | |
| Download: ML20040B665 (47) | |
Text
- _ _ _ _ _ - _
=
G NUREG-0750 Vol.13
)
i Index 1 l
C. R f-m.".._.
.,2544
,-x.-w3 n d,7 i
E E
N'5"%(, W' Obs m 9':$- j n
.m, y
.--.a
' /
K'
- ~ N ji nw; o k". y Q,,n, ' * ' %,..,,
- c. O. f * ' -
.. +. j' ((.
._F-
,s
,~
[ *kV
, " - **J *l wr ;;r a.< vr y
+v p,
-0
,'t c, a,
' mt d.',h*d[? b
.,7 I'
I
- u., & + %m g;% C'*t..e,*%'M m ik f fN/
- NU-
.;;h. @ %:N we.ept,n T
- $IQ ; ? lE,' T -
w y ng,.:m- *a g j qP.
yn.
,n w<:.
s
' '$:;;.g g & e %;-, m;?,' w v b:.. y gn+. M.~2,,,. s q
.m.,
Yav. e u-t s
s 2
I
.. 9 W
M
' =;;:;jW:f,2l;~:
- %y? z w'lty: *a,;,iW ;u.
..y % -
. m.
p T
X r'
- qd:, d s y w:.,
D' O G;jf,,.:
8 ;1%
..?'
- >t M i2E7 INDEXES +no; <mawsa e
amen m.mlGULATORYR~gW
?-@lUCLEARsRE
~
w-MigoMMI i.
U-ESWW p
Mamlj p ggg 4,
w
+_
m,.. um.,.
m,w;M,Qm p n,g,Lvi v.pl w.!?h.
t. m,..
N*'
N ~
, n%~h.%
'v m'
it,4W c
~, o $;.Af~$~?thN
$nl'! '~
_,, y p;
.3 7
g c';T v --Q,qQ.9 s --;.
On
- 77VM, 543r kQQylppsg...,..n?
3.g%.
y.~m, -
4 Q(m
- L.s s
w.
r
- e..W m... '&>.}.y) s N,
- i;l
!~
~;Q::W y,
.m.-
gg*...
,, - b,f. y'ty d
- ,k r-*
'_,s,r
, Q*Sa 'n s.;w,,f ' r
,p' g?
g,.
. % c.
- .J_
3, t.5
.- - r
- g../
.'U M
-3
. ~,3 i
,e-9,.
" QQ' g.h.e;*Q"q-3.,.....
- n. pa.,4, u.ty,.
s.
r y
M.,eg-M s+#n.wH.,,;,- x y
a L
. f$,x. e-..} r %< -ex an g
- 1. s
/>-n
'.*.. % r.,%> n,v%. *'.e
- - *, g' 1 g a; ;-;;,
.r tm -.
. +
. v,m;ul
,i
- > n =%.p ' #*' w*Qg>_ y,,.
g,.,,:L'g r.', q'd~ k 4, ws -
% i A;;.V j ' j'.1%..%t :
a n p y"' h.! N
-g J*
p
%.:.3,'-
/
.s.
= bi
+,f, e 4m d
.h /
y' m
Weg,pp%R
.. U. ~ -: w
..r p t:-
s 5
g 3; jay r y
.y 'i.iW : p gy _Q.
.g nyv q.3 Qs 99~
e&m.e, un9*3,
. t.4 : p.
. = r-m; m m u e
c.a v,
5 &.o -y fg$w$b"q%$m[p-ND m nw 5;nw
& $i [v ts n :-
Qs 0W.
5
. $e%.9g n %..
m::
m.y w u
4 NN b.
5; k._
7[I/
y M,,e e
N N, _.,
_r [.4, b~;.Q-M $l m
%.? w>)
-M 4
+,W yt'*
j MM N;,,&.
f TT'Sy~p_n m,j.e s 2 --
E k, a.,,, y _.h e
w N$gy;-L
- smM#tMge@ger" l. N6Mun$$$$
ei
. m 1: :
. uu 7
/s1 I Oo e%
g<..C %,,. O t
$l
- h. W o,2 %.
~
.o "O.
-6 i
~
2.,
54:vn
% r.
- yvn Q \\
i l,
n
\\
10c * 't 9
8201260299 810331 F
L k
F 0750 R PDR _L w
t l
.t F
O l
,r; 1,
?.>;:;Dr.
?,
Available fr,x, GPO Sales Program Division of Technical information and Document Co U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission WasNngton, D. C. 20555 arvJ National Technical information Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Microfiche of single copies are available from NRC/GPO Sales Program Washington, D. C. 20555 Errors in this Publication May Be Reported to Vicki E. Yene q
p..
Technical Information and Document Control, Office of Mmin y
. Q -[
t 9
- U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D. C. 205 (301/492 8925)
I
NU REG-0750 Vol.13
\\
index 1 zc-4 y}.R.l INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES January - March 1981 U.S. NUCLEAR REf,ULATORY COMMISSION I
,4
,% K,.
(
1
Foreword Mih ;
Digests and indexes fe: ismances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic
,['
Safety and Licensing Appeal Panei (3. LAB), the Atomic Safety and ucensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors Denials I'"'
i l
(DD), and the Denials of Petitions of Rulemaking are presented in this document.
These digests and indexes are intended to serve as a guide to the issuances.
Informaticn elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:
Case name (owners of facility)
Full text reference (volume and pagination)
Issuance number issues raised by appellants legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)
Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter ofissues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction permit,operatinglicense,etc.)
Type of issuance (memorandum. order, decision, etc.).
These information elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arranged as follows:
- 1. Case NameIndex The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearins, the type ofissuance, I
docket number, issuance number,and full text reference.
- 2. Digests and lleaders ne headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:
j the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Ucensing Appeal Panel (ALAB),
the Atomic Safety and Ucensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judge (AU), the Directors Denials (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking.
The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facihty name, docket number, type of hearing, date ofissuance, and type ofissuance.
The digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal references used in resolving the issue. If a give.n issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests gre used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.
. :,9 an.,
" shy iN.WT iii
- 3. Legal Citations Index e
This index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alphanumerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and Statutes
. S.ir,.?
may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability d$j;-
of the citation. It is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.
The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.
- 4. Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. The subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.
- 5. Facility Index This index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number,and full Rxt reference.
$~2DV
' ki }j t
=
L i
1 1
r P
b i-L C,
T'%,
a W
C CASE NAME INDEX h
IMETON ED3ON COMPANY et al CONST RUCTION PERMIT MEMOR ANDUM. Dtaket Su t' AI *?l 0 2.13 NRC 91 (1980 CONSTRUCTION PE RMIT, PARTI AL INITI AL DECISION, Ab Mi71-CP. LBP-81-3.13 NRC 103 (1981)
CINCINNATI G AS & ELECT RIC COMPANY et al OPER ATING LICENSE. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Daket %358 OL; ALAB-633.13
- 3. ;
W' NRC 94 (1981)
OPER AllNG LICENSL, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER. Ducket %358 OL, LBP-81-2,13 51 NRC 36 (1981) yM COMBUSTION ENGINEERING. INC.
SPECI AL PROCEEDING, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER, Apptwatson No XR 137, Dxket L*
11002252. Applwaison No X5NM41753. Duket il(X)2253. Applaatson No XSNM41754.
Dukei 11002254. CLI 81-2.13 NRC 67 (1981)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
$PECIAL PROCEEDING. DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2 20n. Dakets %295, %
u L"<.
304. DD-812. It NRC 281 (1981)
CONSOLIDATE D EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK
!M SPECI AL PROCEEDING. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Dukets %247 %286. CLI-811.
Of 3,.
13 NRC I (1981)
CONSUME RS POW ER WMPANY ORDE R OF MODIFICATION OF LICENSE MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Dmkets %329 OM & OL, %330 OM & OL; ALAB-634,13 NRC 06 (1981)
OPER ATING LICENSE; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Dukets %329 OM. %330 OM. W I
329 OL, %330 OL; LBP-814.13 NRC 216 (1981)
?
OPE RATING LICENSE AMENDMENT. DECISION. Duket %I55 OLA, (Spent Euct I%l j
Espanuon). ALAB-636 13 NRC 312 (1981)
DAIRYLAND POW ER COOPERATIVE
, f,.
SHOW CAUSE. PARTI AL INITI AL DECISION, Dahet W409-SC. Pros Op Lic. DPR-45.
LBP41-7.13 NRC 257 (1981)
L DUKE POW'ER CO. NORTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORP.. SALUDA RIVER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ANTITRUST PROCEEDING. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Dukets %413A. %414A.
I' LBP-81-1.13 NRC 27 (1981)
DUKE POW ER COMPANY N
OPERATING LICENSE. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Dxkets %369 OL. %370 OL; ALAB 626.13 NRC 17 (1981)
O SPLCI AL PROCEEDING. DIRECTOR 3 DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2 206. Dmkets %413. %
JT '
414. (10 C F R 2 206). DD-81 1,13 NRC 45 (1981)
U ENVIRONMENTAL RADIATION PROTLCTION ST ANDARDS FOR NUCLEAR POW ER OPERATIONS. 40 CFR 190 b
SPECI AL PROCEEDING. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Dmket %289 (Researt) CLI-81-4 13 NRC 298 0981) p; i
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY iI
$PECI AL PROCEEDING. MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER, Applwatmn No XR.135. Dmket 11001075. ApplKation No X5NM 01662. Daket 11001076, CLt-812.13 NRC 67 (1981) f2 '-
v HOUSTON LIGHT AND POW ER COMPANY SPECIAL PROCEEDING, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Dmket %466. ALAB-623.13 NRC I".
13 (1981)
R CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, DECISION. Dmet %466. ALAB-629.13 NRC 75 0981)
, s fc CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Dahet %466. ALAB-62.13 7
<*f}/
g i.;;M,;
NRC 84 (1981) ri k
9' l &-.f s.
i s
l l
K=*
I i
4
t CASE NAME INDEA O
CONSTRUCilON PIRMIT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDDt Ihuket Sam, ALAIM31,13 f
NRC 87 (1981) i SPICIAL PROCf IDING, MEMORANDUM AND ORDE R. Ikuket M466 ALAB435,13 NRC o-y, 309 (198 0 44:
. p'j ",
10NG istAND LIGitTING COMPANY and NEW YORK ST%TE ELFCTRIC A GAS G) i' -
R A TION G)NSTRUCTION PI RMIT, MEMORANDUM AND ORDI.R. Ihdets MSl6, MSl7, ALAll-j 628,13 NRC 24 (1981) i MElHOPO!IT AN TDISON G)MPANY, et al SPICI AL PROCfIDING, ORDI R, thuket M289 (Researth CLI 88 3,13 NRC 291 (1981) l NORTHIRN INDIANA PUBLIC $FRVICE CT)MPANY G)Ns!RUCTION Pt RMIT AMENDMI NT, MI MORANDUM AND ORDI R, thsket W367 j
CPA, (Castructum Permit Entensum), IBP-81-6,13 NRC 253 (1981)
PAClflC GAS & FLICTRIC G)MPANY
$PICIAL PROCFEDING, DIRI4 TOR S DFCISION UNDER 10 CFR 2 20h, ths-kets M275, M 323, DD 813,13 NRC 349 (1981)
OPERATING tlCENSI', PRElf TARING G)NITRENCE ORDER, thskets M2754)L M323-OL, L DP 81-S,13 NRC 226 (1951)
PENN5YLVANIA POWE R & 11GIIT COMPANY and ALIEGiiENY ELECTRIC GM)PTRA.
1 TIVf. INC, OFE RATING LICENSE, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, thskets M387 01, M388 OL; LBP 81-8,13 NRC 335 (1981)
PORTIAND GI NER AL ELECTRIC G)MPA NY, et. al.
SPICIAL PROCEIDING, MI MORANDUM AND ORDIR, thshet MM4, (C4mtrol Buikhng).
ALA B 627,13 NRC 20 (1981)
POHIR AUTif0RITY OF Tile STATE OF NEW YORK SP!'CIAL PROCilDING MEMOR ANDUM AND OkDIR, thshet M286, C11-81-1,13 NRC i (198 0 Wl3TINGHOUSE ElICTRIC COMPANY SPE CIAL PROCILDING, MI MORANDUM AND ORDER, Applaatum No XR lM [hsLes 110020S8, Appipatum No XSNM41719, thshet 11002175, CLI-SI-2,13 NRC 67 (1981) l l
l l
e;;yb' 9 MNd.
2 yw, J y.4 y Q:. p.M
r I
l
~; '.
I e
5 e; N. ;.
. g :s,
g.
?
DIGESTS f
ISSUANCFS OF Tile NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMNIISSION i
CLI811 CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY Of' NEW YORK. POWER AUTHORITY Ol' THE ST ATE OF' NEW YORK. IND' AN POINT. UNIT NO 2. INDIAN POINT. UNIT NO 3. [hskee No M 247. W 286 % 286 SPECIAL PROCEEDING. January 2.1981. MEMO-RANDUM AND ORDER A
The Crenmnuon (I) demes the licenwes' motion for reco deraten of its prewmusly announced decevon to hold a dncretmary adjudicatory heanns to coneder long term safety nsues raiwd in connecimn mith a petitum Gled by the Union of Concerned Suentists requestmg. inter sha, the shut-L down of Umts 2 and 3 of the Indian Point nuclear facihues,(2) directs that the proceedmg be conducted by an Atomic Safety Licenung Board obwh is to take evidence and reccmmend Gndags and conclushms on dnputed contentums for final acton by the Commmum, and (3) mues procedural and sulwtantive guidehnes for the conduct of the heanns The Cornmieson aho reafGrms its earher deciuon to permit operaten of Units 2 and 3 dunng the adjudwatory heanng, but announces that it mill reenamme the t
valuWy of that determmatiori mith respect to Umt 2 (ohnh currently n snutdown) before permittmg I
that umt to resume operstmn CLI 81-2 GENE RAL ELECTRIC COMPANY. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, COMBUSTION ENGINEERING. INC.. EXPORTS TO TAlWAN. Aprlwaton No X R - 135.
thicket 11001075. Applicatum No X$NM41662. Docket 18001076 Apphcaton No XR 136. Dak.
et 11002058. ApplKaton No. XSNM41719. thsket 11002175 Apphcatum No XR-137. Dmket 11002252. Appenatuwe No. XSNM41753. [huket 18002253. Appbcatum No X5NM 01734 Ihsket g
11002254 SPECI AL PROCEEDING. f ebrurs 13. 1981, MEM',RANDUM AND ORDE R r
A The Comrmuxm demes a petitum to intervene and request for a hea:ing on incrise arrinatioin for g
the esport to Taman of two nuclear reactors and auocimied nalear fuel, determmes that the applaatums meet all appbcable caport hcenung cntena, and directs that the hcenws t e mued with the condition that they become effectne only upm award to the Inenwe of a constract by the Taman Power Company B
In making emport hcenung decisions the Commmion mill not conuder wnsmc nsks posed by the reactor ute. voksnic rnks pwed by the ute. rnks pwed by a high peulatum denuty around the use, and dangen to the health and safety of mdniduals reudmg m the recupert nat:or C
in makmg reactor emport twenung deciuons. the Commmion will conuder the hkely environmental impact on the ghAal commons of the propmed reactor emports D
where hcenws authonimg emports of pmer reactors and low ennched uramum to a speci6c country have presmusly been mued by the Commmion subwquent to the enactment of the Nuclear Non-Prohferatum Act, the Commnuon may mue lwenws for umdar enports to the wmc country upm determmmg that there are no matenal changed circumstances associated with the apphcatens under conuderatum from tho%c ennting at the time of muance of the earher hcenw Atomic Energy Act.
[
5ectum 126a (2M B),10 Cf R 110 44(aM2) In determmmg whether maienal char'ged circumstanco have p
8 occurred unce issuance of a previous inenw. the Cunmnuon enawimes whether any events have adverwly affected the adequacy of the suurataes gnen by the recipent nation on the matten cenered by wctons 127 and 128 of the Atomic Energy Act. and whether there have been any ugmikant changes m the recipent naton's non prohferaten pohcies CLI 81-3 METROPOLITAN EDISON COMPANY. ET AL., THRF E MILE 15 LAND NUCLE AR STATION UNIT 1. Dmket No. 54289. (Restart). SPECI AL PROCEEDING. Marsh 23.1981. ORDE R A
Responding to sanous motions by the hcenwe, the Cemrmsuon (1) demes a request thrt it permit eI the restart of Umt I upm comphance with certain conditions pnor t, completon of the ongomg heanngs on whether resumption of plant operation should he authonred. (2) defen ruimg on a propned licenw amendment seekmg to transfer the au%nty to pswss. uw and operate the unit from
@.i J,U.
Metropohtan E4non to GPU Nuclear Corporatum. (3) granis a moton requestmg prmmmn to hegm k
y [.'
hot functumal testmg uung non-nuclear heat. (4) grants a request that it make a decum on the
{
7fn '%.
U.
A m a Lc,
' 17 h y,.
3 t
3 L
e, b
L u.
k 1
0 DIGFSTS ISSUANCES Oir Tile NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O
ti
[
effectneness of a hcenung Imard decmon ethm 35 days of ensuance of such deemon,(5) an st mli handle on a case-by<ase baus requests frtwn deferral of implementatum daies for sarm a
9J f
accident related actions required by NUREG4737 (6) determmes that the issue of the Gnan the beenwe to operate the umt should not tv htigated in this proceedmg, and (7) directs the E
,/
}
Director of Operatums to ensure that the staf) devote outricient resources to the proceeding Jg
{
CLI-81-4 Y*,#
ENVIRONMENTAL RADI ATION PROITCTION STANDARDS FOR NUCLEAR POWER OPERATIONS, 40 Cf R 190. TliREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION. UNIT th=Let No. 54289 (Restartt SPECIAL PROCEEDING, March AND ORDER
- 26. 1981 MEMORANDUM A
The Commisuon denses a petition riled by the Amencan Mmms Congress for a stay of emplementatum and enforcement of tbc Environmental Protection Agency's radiatum protectu k
standards,40 CFR Part 190, as apphed to NRC.hcenwd uramum rmfl The Commmam aho demes a petitum filed jomtly by several uranium mill operators to defer or resemd NRC regulatams sm EPA's Part 190 req irements on uramum milh p
B Ahhough the authonty to estabhsh generally apphcable standards for protectkiri of the etwironme a
[
from radawictive matenals resides in the Ensironmental Protection Agency under Reorgamza No 3 of 1970. 84 Stat 2086,42 U.S C.A. 4321 nose, the NRC remams resporuble for enforci i
standards at NRC-hcensed facabrics k
C I
An agency's regulatams are presumed wahd until the promulgating agency or a court vrwidines or invahdates ahem f
D in order to obtain a stay, petitumers must sausfy a four fold test.
(a)that they are bkcly to presad on the merita, (b) that they mil suffer streparable harm mthout a stay. (c) that other interested l
would not be substantially harmed by a stay; and (d) that the pubbe mierest supports a stay i
Petrolem Jobbers Ass'n s. TPC, 259 F 2d 921,925 (D C. Cir.1958), Washington Metropohtan Tranut Commisuon v Ilohday Tours. Inc.,559 F.2d 841. 843-44 (D C. Car 1977).
i i
irI
(
t
's
[, n y%
,Q, a (N? i.,t O'w 4
+
49 O. Y-l e
6
l '.
P I
O i
r>
V t
h,. _,
~ if.<
(
t',
,./s.
b.
d.*y L
f
'4$
,i 9
DIGESTS iv ISSUANCFS OF Tile ATOM!C SAFETY AND LICELSING APPEAL BOARDS
[
r-b AL AB e25 HOUSTON LIGHT AND POWLR COMPANY, ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR GENER ATING ST ATION. UNIT NO 1. IAnkei No. S466. SPECI AL PROCEEDING. January g
5.1931. MLMOR ANDULI AND ORDER g
The Appeal Ibard d.smmes as interksutory an miervenor's appeal of the Licenung ibard's order
{
A rea.cmdmg any pnor orders of that I acenung Ibard e hwh had granted procedural asmaance punuant to G J dJ 7
10 Cf R 2 750tc)
B Inierlocutory appeals are barred m terms by the Commiumn's Rules of Practice.10 CF R 2 730ift
- p..
Pubiw Serswe Co of Oklahoma (Black Fon Station. Umts I and 2k ALAB 370,5 NRC 13i (1977).
D A LA B-t 26 DUKE POWER COMPANY. %ILLI AM B MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION, J
UNITS 1 AND 2. Daket Nc 50 3e9 OL, S370 OL. OPERATING LICENSE. January 6,1981 L
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER pr, ;\\
A
pon renew pursaant to IO CIR Part 2. Appendia B. d the Luenung Board's order M November
- x-4 25.140 authonnns a heenw for foci loadmg. imtial entwahey and zero power phyucs testmg of Umt 1 of the McGuire facihty, the AppealIbard concludes that no stay is marranted and amrms the order to A
the entent reuemed i,-
7 -
B Encept as prouded m 10 CFR Part 2, Appendia B. Lwenung Board dectuons whwh authonie
'S f
hcenung actum become effective only after the Appeal Ikm 4 and C<nnmiumn attums outlmed m that h
,7 Appendia have taken place ALAB 627 PORTLAND GENERAL E LFCTRIC COMPANY, c. al. TROJAN NUCLEAR M
PL ANT. Duket No W344. (Control Buildmg! SPECI AL PROCE EDING. January 6,1981; M
ME MOR ANDUM AND ORDER A
The Appeal Ibard grants a jomt monum by the hcenwe, stalT and the State of Oregon requ.umg that i.
it (1) reopen the record m thn prmeedmg in mder to recene a s*ipulaten esecuted by them and certam J
q
'7*
Jocuments prenously furnnt.ed the Board by she staff and (2) modify a twenw conditon to take account of the stipulation thauw the unpulation is dnpw+e d the ungle mue grewnted by the State of j
Oregon's appeal. the lioa rd damnse, the appeal as nm A L A3-628 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY and NF%' YORK STATE ELECIRIC &
C AS CORPOR ATION, JAMESPORT NUCL EAR PO%'ER STATION. UNITS 1 AND 2. Docket in 54516. 50 517 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. January 15, 1981; MEMORANDUM AND OR.
f DER A
On apptwant's reprewniation that the Jamesport plant will not be built, the Appeal Ibard grar.ts applwant's mo' ion to termmate ihn constructum permit proceedmg as moot The Appeal ibard also wasates the Lwenung Board decessoris (LBP-78-17, 7 NRC 826 (1978) and LBP 78-41. 8 NRC '50 (1978)) authonsmg constructum of the facehty, diuniues the pendmg appeal therefrom, and directs that k,,.,
A LA B-629 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR
~P,+1g the outstandmg constructum permits he revoked GENER ATING STATION. UNIT NO l. Docket No W466, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT.
.p Februais 2.1%I. DECISION A
The Appeal Ibard amrrrn the I wenung Ibardi erant of applwant's vnotion for summary dnpmtion of a contenten advotarms the conuderation of a Nmau farm as an alternaine to the constructum of l
the Allens Creek faciht)
(
B The Rules of Practne authonic any party lo a proceedmg to move, with or without supportmg 6
affidants. for a deouon in that party's favor as to all or any part M the matters mvolsed in the J
pracedmg Such motum must he accompamed by "a wparate, short and corwne statement of the t,
ma.cnal facts as to a hwh the movmg party contends that there is no genume mue to be heard " 10 CFR y
2 74 % s)
C The Rules of Practwe require a party resemdmg m oppoution to a monum for summary dnpmtum to If mc'ude m its respmw a wparate, e.hort and corwne statement of the matenal facts as to whkh it is
,.,pf [
contended that there cants a genume mue in he heard " 10 CFR 2 74%a) %'here a monum for summary f,7 G_
L.lQ,.;;
g'
- %.s.%'
j C' N !.
jfc 4
..c.
'.9-f 5
k p
v
- d. -
w
.e a
e t
i 4
l t
I I
DIGFSIS j
ISSUANCFS OF Tl!E ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICFNSING APPEAL BOA O
s I
e dnpon taon is progerly supp>rted, the response may not rest upon mere alleganons or de=u
-~-
{
"must set forth specific facts showm3 that there is a genume issue d fact." %rgmia Eicctnc a Co (North Anna Nu lear Power Stauun, Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-584. Il NRC 451,453 (1980),
2.749(b)
D Ennronmental impact statements need not discuss the environmental effects of alternati 7-,-
deemed only remote and speculative posutshnes Pubhc Service E3cetne and Gas Co (
Generstmg Station, Units I and 2), ALAB.518. 9 NRC 14,38 (1979).
ALAB 610 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO I, Docket No ruary ).1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 54466, CONSTRUCTION PERMAT, Feb-l A
The Appeal Board demes meervenor's request for (l) directed certificatson of vanous be
{
ruhngs (2) an order haitmg the progress of the heanng below pendmg the requested appe
}
and(3)a change m the compounon of the Lacensms Board.
B The pracoce of simultaneously seekmg reconssderanon by tb Licensmg Board of in f
ruhngs and appellate review of the same ruhngs as disfavored.
}
C Appeal boards are drunchned to assume "the role of a day 4oday momtor" of the " numerous j
determmanons" which must be made by hcenung boards "respectmg m hat evidence as penm t
l what procedural framework it may be adduced" Toledo Edison Co (Dans Besse Nuclear Pcme Stauon, Umt 1). ALAB-314,3 NRC 98,99(1976).
D A motion to disquahfy one or more memben of a hcensmg board must be first presented to that in stnct conformity with 10 CFR 2.704(c); if the mouon as denied, at will be rouunely referred to appeal board for review.10 CFR 2.704(ck ALAB431 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY, ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR g
GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. I, Docket Ns 50-466, CONSTRUCflON PERMIT; Feb-ruary 4,1981 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
Lacensm, Board barnng creasemarrunate on the tesumony of a B
A party to a proceedmg before a Lacensmg Board has no standmg to press before an Appea (Skagit Nuclear Power Protects. Umts I and 2), ALAB-556,10 N Management Corp. (Chnch River Breeder Reactor Planti, ALAB-345,4 NRC 212,213 (1976)
Project C
A party to an NRC proceedmg is not enutled to cc nplam of a hansang board ruimg unless an that rulns has worked a concrete mjury to has personalinterests. Northern Staten Power Ca (Prain Island Nuclear Generaung Plant. Umts I and 2), ALAB-232,8 AEC 1175, l177(1975);
Ca (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station), ALAB-157,6 AEC 858,859(1973).Toledo Edison D
Appeal boards will not normally mvoke their discretionary directed cere f,atson authonty f purpose of momeonng the day-to day conduct of heensms board evidentiary brN egs.
A LAB 432 UNIT 2, Dodet No. 50-471, CONSTRUCTION PLRMIT; Februar A
The Appeal Board announces its tentative decimon not to mvoke the procedures of App CFR Part 2 (relaung to consaderanon by an Apptal Board of the warrant for a stay)
Board's partial matud decision (LBP-81-3) in this construction permit proceeding, subject to rttonsideration upon the respome of any party mdicatmg disagreement with the basas f Board's dectuon B
Before the Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon may issue an LWA, a Ucensmg Bo inter sha, all the findmgs required by 10 CFR 5152(b) and (c) to be made pnor to the issuance I
construction permit for a facihty.10 CFR 40.10(c)(2).
}
C of the marrant for a stay (either on monon or sua sponte ) ap
)
)
ok.hemselves provide the underpinnmgs of "hcensms actics." Duke Power Co. (Wdham B. M l
Nuclear Station, Units I and 2). ALAB426.13 NRC 000,000(1981).
ALAB433 CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, ET AL. WILLIAM H ZIMMER STATION, Docket No. 50 358 OL; OPERATING LICENE; February 9,1981; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
The Appeal Board dismmes as interlocutory an antervenor's appeal from the Lacensm summary disposition (LBP-81-2) of one of his contenuons B
Under the Commisuon's Rules of Practice, appeals from interlocutory orders issue boards must anast the "mittal decisaan" rendered by the board at the end of the case 1 and 2.762.
y,%
c
- 2 p>+,
6
- Q g,, '
'Y
=
L l
DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BOARDS i
m
. 5 N
ALAM34 CONSUMERS POW ER COMPANY, MIDLAND PLANT, UNITS I AND 2. Docket No S329 OM & OL, S330 OM & OL: ORDER OF MODIFICATION OF LICENSE, N.#'
February 19, 1981 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
'. ~ S A
The Appeal Board dechnes to acupt the Licenung Board's referral under 10 CFR 2.730(f) of a
?
ducovery ruhng mmpelhng the depouuan of a named NRC ataff member.
J B
The staN may take the depimition of other parties a Commisuon proceedmgs subject only to the general stnctures on discovery contamed m the Rules of Pracuce. Discovery against the staN, however,is more hmited.
C The Eaccutive Director for Operations deugnates those stan members available to respond to discovery requests. others may be depowd only if a Lacenung Board allows it upon a showing of"special circumstances." Those circumstances are prewnt, for eaample, if the staN member who is sought to be deposed "has direct personal knowledre not known to the witnesnes made available by the Eaccuuve Director for Operauons." 10 CFR 2.7Mb W 1) and (2)
D Interlocutory appeals are not favned m Commisuon proceedmss any more than m pidicial pracuce.
Whether review should be undertaOn on certification pursuant to 10 CFR 2 718(i) or by referral under 10 CFR 2.720(f) before the end of ne case turns on whether a failure to address the issue would senously I
harm the pubhc mterest, result m unusual delay or empense, or aNect the bauc structure of the proceedmg m souie pervauve or unusual manner. Discovery ruimgs rarely meet thoac tests.
E Appeal Boards may not second guess a Lacenung Board.a its ducovery ruhngs. Rather, they may take up seferrals of those ruimgs only if there is an mdication thu the Lacensmg Boanf abused the ducreuon the Commission gave et in this area.
F Whether or not the person to be deposed will later be called to tesufy as a witness is irrelevant for discovery purposes. The test is, rather, whether the informauon sought appears reasonab;y calculated to lead to the discovery of admnuble endence.10 sFR 2.740 ALAB-635 HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY. ALLENS CREEK NUCLEAR l
GENERATING STATION, UNIT NO. I, Docket No. 2466, SPECIAL PROCEEDING; March 1
- 10. 1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
The Appeal Board demes an mtervenor's motion seekms directed certificauan of an mterlocutory ruhng of the Licenung Board.
B Discreuonary mterlocutory renew will be undertaken only where the ruhng below either (t) threatens the party adverwly afIccted by it with immediate and senous irreparable impact which, as a practical matter. could not be allenated by a later appeal or (2) aNects the base structure of the proceedmg in a pervauve or unusual manner.
ALAM36 CON 5UMERS POWER COMPANY. BIG ROCK POINT NUCLEAR PLANT.
Docket No. S155 OLA, (Spent Fuel Pool Espansion); OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; March 31,1981. DECISION A
The Appeal Board reverws a referred ruhng of the Licenung board (LBP-8425,12 NRC 355) shich holds that, m conjunction with agency conuderation of an apphcanon fer a bcense amendment to expand the spent fuel pool of a facihty that has never undergone environmental.ence. Secuon 102(2)(C) of the Nanonal Emnronmental Pohey Act (NEPA) requires an ennronmental impact statement (EIS) covenng the cNects d the spent fuel pool expanuon as well as the addiuonal serm of operation that such espanuon woult' permit. The Appeal Board rules that unless the proposed spent fuel pool engenmon wdl change reactor operation, the agency's envvonmental revwn for P,is hcenw amendment need not conuder the contmued plant operanon that the capanded pool might permit. The Appeal Board also directs the Licensmg Board to reconuder its compamon order to the staN to prepare an Els on the spent fuel pool itself B
Matenal tendered by a pany without leave of the Appeal Board, aner an appeal has been subnutted for deciuon, connututes improper supplemental argumer.t.
C Agency mterpretauon and apphcauan of NEPA es subject to a " rule of reason" Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton,458 F.2d 827,834,837 (D C. Cir.1972)
D Where the environmental status quo associated with plant operauon wdl remam unchanged by a proposed hcense ame9dment to espand a spent fuel pool, the environmental renew for such hcense amendment need not conuder the cNects of contmued plant operation. See Committee for Auto Responubibty v. Solomon,603 F.2d 992 (D C. Cir.1979), cert demed. 445 U.S. 915 (1980).
E The purpose of a NEPA inquiry a to identify aspects of a project that can stdl be changed to mitigate posubly detnmental ennronmental cNecta. Virguuans For Dulles v. Volpe. 341 F.2d 442,446 (4th Cir.
1976).
F Lacenung boards should not decide ehether a given acuan is one that ugnificantly aNects the We,fa %
- *~
ennronment without the record support prowded by the stafra ennronmental review.
um-,
WW'
' MJ,; *a ;
7
DIGESIS L%UANCES OF TifE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING APPEAL BO O
"savolves unresolved connets concerning attemauve uses of a 102(2ME)
, atwn 11 N ;' f Sectuan 102(2ME)of NEPA is not hmited to mapr federal actens having a sigmficant effect on
,l '
environment. at may requwe consaferaten of afternauves in a case ehere the preparaton of an EIS is no required
',v~
0.:
t t
i
_*'d
' \\ '3
sf'll
..,. k,,.2 j
s l
. $. p..
.[t i T' *e s s
L
[
p u
5 v.
y r;f =
/*,.
y s
V
.M-Q
'[
g
(.-
y DIGESTS i
ISSUANCES OF Tile AIOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS t-P LflP gl.1 DUKE POW ER CO. NORTil CAROllN A EL ECTRIC MEMBE R5tilP CORP, 5A.
ll '
LUDA RIVI R ELECIREC COOPER ATIVE, CAT A% HA NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS I AND o.
2 - ANIITRUST, Dinket No 50 413A. 54414A. ANTliRUST PROCELDING. January 13. 1981.
M ME MOkANDUM AND ORDER A
The Lnenung Ekiard denies a request for.n antitruu heanns on an appinatum for an arnendinent to the corniruction permit for the Catamba plant authonzing the transfer of ownership meernes in the f
plant B
in order to he admmed to a prrweedmg as an intervenor as a matter of nghi, a petitumer for inserventum muu allege hoth (1) wmc mjury that has occurred or wil probably result from the actum mvolved. and (2) an miere I arguably withm the " sone of miernts" protected or regulated by the statute wught to be invoked (and o hnh the enbunal is empowered so administer)
C NRC antitrust junsdictum ts rmt plenary, the Cornmmion n authorned to conditum heenses on "7
antitrust grounds only where necessary to ensure that the activities so twenwd mill neither create omr maminin utustuxis mcorisisient with the antstrust laws. Detroit EAiwn Company (Lanco I-erme Atomic Power Plant. Unit No. 2), ALAB 475,7 NRC 752. 756 (1978) o.
7 Conteniums raiunt mancial or safety mues are beyond the scope of N RC antitruu heanngs.
f D
E in order to mvoke the NRC's antitrust junsd.ctum, a requesi for a heanns and mierventum must (1)descnbe the utuatum allegedly mconuwent with the antitruu laws ohnh n the baus for meerventum, ar (2)descnhe how that utustum connects mith the pohcies underlymg the Sherman Act, Clayton Act, or Federal Trade Commmum Acts, g
(3)descnbe how the usuatum allegedly inconustent with the anntruu laws would be created or mzmtained by activitic under the inenw, p
(4)iJennfy the specific rehef wught, and
{.
(5)emplam why the rehef sought fails to be satisfied by the license conditions, if any, ohnh have been propned by the Department of Jusuce F
Pentions for mierventum may be granted as a matter of dncretum to pentumers lackmg standmg as a h
matter of nght who may make wmc contnbutum to the pnteedmg Facton to be conudered mclude
[',.
(1) a pentumer's shommg of.sgnifwant shihty to contnbute on substantial inues oflaw or fact a hwh eill
- y..
not be othermsw properly raned or prewnted, p
(2) the speuficity of such abihty 10 coninbule on t)Kmc substantialinves of lam for fact.
(3)juuifAatum of time spent on conudenng the sutntantial mues oflaw or fact, (4) prouuon of additumal teuimony, partKular emperine. or eapert muissance.
h.
(5) specishred ed scatum or pertment empenence L B P-g l.2 CINCINN ATI GAS A ELECTRIC, IT et al, WILLIAM H ZIMMER NUCLEAR D
STATION. OPER ATING LICLNSE PROCFEDING, Draket No 50 358 OL; OPERATING C
LICENSL January 23. 1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
The LKenung ikiard grants the apphcants' moe on for sum nary dnpoutum of an intervenor's contentum corwernmg the task of a plan for trammg of the populace in commumun thnmgh ohnh radmactne matenals will be shipped to cope with transportanon accidents mvolvmg those shipmects W
H In an operstmg luenw pnseedmg. mhere ugmfwant health and safety or environmen!al mucs are mvolved, a hcenung board should grani a mosum for summary dnpoutuiri only if it is convinced from she matenal filed that the public health and safety or the environment will be satnfactonly protected
.~
Cleveland Eintnc Illummatmg Co (Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Units I and 2). ALAB443,6 NRC 741,751-54 (1977).10 C FR 2 N)a C
The proviuons of 10 CFR 473 37 require hcenwes to prepare a plan for the phyucal protectum of h
spent fuel shiptr.ents agamst sahotage There is no requirement that such a plan br renewed prmr to (and 4
as a conditum of) the grant of an operstmg hcenw P
, % ; a.'
D in general. inwfar as puhhc health and safety enues are concerned, an appinant v.hnh derruwurnic jr
[* O r that it has comphed with applicable regulatsors= mould be grarised an operatorig inense Orily in.nusual bt.
.' u iy
.%,.h,,,[
r,,
,i m
>, ~,
e.6 g
-, +
s 9
y
~
L' 4'
k h...
}
}
DIGESTS l
ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATONilC SAIT.TY AND LICENSING BOARDS S
i f
circumstances, where paubly a demonstrable threat to the pubhc heahh and safety had been shown to e
j eust, casid a hcenung teerd convder and impue, if necessary, corrective measures additumal to those Iv4 prescnbed or at least comprehended by the rules.
LDP-B l.3 HOSTON EDISON WMPANY ET AL, PILGRIM NUCIEAR POWER STATION,
,~~,?. '.
UNIT 2 Ihuket No %471-CP, WNSTRUCTION PLRMIT; February 2,1981, PARTsAL INI.
s
^
TIAL DLCl510N I y Yj,*
1 A
in a partial mitial decisam, the Lxenung floard rules that a permit to construct Unit 2 of the Pilgnm
'4., '
i facihty shoukt be assued, subject to certam coridations, upiei favoraNe completnin of hearings on emergency plannmg and inves related to the Three Mdc Island accalent as mell as a reaucument of ts.e cost-tenefit baisnce for the plant follommg thme hearngs B
An apphcant for a construction permit must show that 4t either pascues or has reawmable anurance of tems able to obtam the funds necenary to cover estimated constructkiri and related fuel c4=ta 10 Cf R 20 3hf) and 10 Cl R Part 30 Appendia C. A reammable assurance does nas mean a denumstratum of l
near certainty that an apphcant will never be preued for funds in the coune of mnstructum It does
)
mean that the apptwant must have a reasonable plan m hght of relesant circumstances. Pubhc Service Co of New lismpsNre(5cabrmk Statum, Units I and 2), CLI-78-1,7 NRC I,18 (1978).
C Lwensms the construction of a nu lear power plant is a " major federal actum" within the meanmg of
(
Srcion 102t2MC) of the National Dmronmental Pokey Act That sectum requires the Comminum to conuder whether reasonaNe alternatives less harmful to the environment exist before allowing e utihty to
{
proceed with cor struction D
To sarmfy NI PA, the NRC must identify, study and compare alternanve sites for the locatum of a propsal facihty In determmmg ahether a propard site es environmentally acceptable, the Ikurd must find that after givmg each alternative site a hard look, none is found obvunasly superior to the one propmed by the apphcant. Pubhc Service Co of New flampshire (Seabrmk Statum, Umts I and 2), CLI-77 8,5 NRC 503(1977).
Tes hnwal quahfwatums Financial quahrwatums Theft and sahotage Genenc safety problems Steam geners.or tube meegr-ey Quahey Assurance Comphance with Appendan I Site suitahihty LPZ and populatum center dntarwe requiremems Industnal and transpirtatum hazards Hydrology and meteorokigy Geology and semmology Envinemental matters Need for po=ct Impacts of constructnin Impacts of operatum Radiohigicalimpacts l'ucl a*adatwhty Waste dnpaal facihties Cons *ratum of ahernatives Alternate sites Alternative sources of energy Alternate condenser candmg umnemental effects of putulated accidents Aircrafi crash nsk Release of raduinctive matenals m effluents Transpiristam ornalcar matenal As low a2 resumably achievable ( ALARA)
L BP-B i-4 WNSUMERS POWE R WMPANY, MIDLAND PLANT, UNITS I AND 2, Docket Na M329 OM, %330 OM, 4329 OL, 50 330 OL; OPERATING LiCEN5E, Febnaary 12, 1981, MLMORANDUM AND ORDER A
The beenung therd confirms its earher hench ruhng grantmg the apphcant's tactions to compel the depuitums of three named NRC staff t.se ihers, subject to certain hmitations The Ikerd demes the staffs motum for -econsulcration of the earher ruling with respect to one of tkne members but grants its l
alternative motum to refer that aspect of the ruhng to the Appeal floard. The Ikerd also confirms its l
- w
., a,'
1f 5 s
DIGESTS f
ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARDS n~.
carher demal of a staff motaan for a protecove order to prevent the further depsition of a fourth staff member.
B Depmat,ons of named NRC staff memters may be reqmred only upon a.howing of excepuonal circumstances 10 CR 2.720th)(2)
LBP-81-5 PAClHC GAS A ELECTRIC COMPANY, DIABLO CANYCN NUCLEAR POWER PIANT, UNITS I & 2 Docket No. 506275 OL, 50w323-OL; OPERATING LICENSE, Febnnry 13,19Al; PREllEARING CONFERENCE ORDER A
In a preheanng confereace order in a proceedmg to conuder a monos by apphcant for authonty to Ic.ad fuel and conduct low ptmer testmg (pursuant to 10 CFR 50 57(c)), the Lacensmg Board (1) confirms its prevmus ruhnss oenying motons by the Governor of Cahforma seekiag reconsaderaton of
- he Board's carher demal of his request to stay the proceedmg pendmg the preparanon of an EIS cw EIA deshng with fuelloadms, testmg, and lo= power opret.on and for an order dirertmg the staff to prepare either an EIS or EI A;(2) desceibes the entens under which it will admit contentions for htiganon m the proceedmg m hght of NURLG4737 (the Commisuon's revised TM1-related reymremenia for new operatmg hcenses) and CLI-80-42 (the Commisuun's revised pchey statement for implementat on of the TMI-related requirements into the hcensang process); (3) denies a request by an intervenor group that tae Luard certify to the Commisuon the queshon of the entena for decidmg.he admasubthty of contentons in this proceedmg (4) rvies on tis contentions s abmitted by the in.ervenor group; (5) rules on the subjects on mSach the Governor of Cahforma may partacipate in the promedmg as the representauve of an mterested state under 10 CFR 2.715(c), and (6) adopts the schedule for pre-heanns actmues supulated by the parties B
Whew the environmental impacts of full-term, full-power operaton have already been evaluated m an environmental impact statement, a hcensmg action for hmited operation that wouk! result m lesser impacts need not be accompanned by enhet an addinonal impact statement or an impact appraisal.
C New retulatory requirements estabhsh good cause for reopenmg a record or admittmg new
)
contentions on matters related to the new requirement.
t D
A representauve of an mterested state partic'gAtmg under 10 CFR 2.715(c)is not required to s* nit contennons of his own in order to partacipate in a proceedmg, but af the representauve wishes to rane i
specific issues not nthermue accepted by a board, he must comply with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.7 84(b) for acceptable contentions. Galf State Utahties Co. (Raver Bend Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-444,6 NRC 760(1977).
LBP-81-6 NORT11ERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, BAILLY GENERATING ST ATION, NUCLEAR I, Docket No. 50L367 CPA, (Construction Permh Extenmon), CONSTRUC-TION PERMIT AMENDMENT; February 20, 1988; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A
The Laceriung Board in tbs construction permit catension proceedmg demes a motion seekmg reconuderston of the Board's carher demal of certam contentons and dechnen t: certify or r-fer the dental to the Appealikurd or Commisuon.
B Contennons that have no disarn ble relanonship to the construction permit extensaan are madnusuble m a permit extenuon proceedmg For such contennons, a shom<ause promedmg under 10 CR 2.20t> is the exclusave remedy. Nonhern Indiana Fubhc Service Co. (Bailly G-nerstmg Stauan, Nuclear I), ALAB-619,12 NRC 558 (1980).
LBP-81-7 DAIRYLAND PGWER COOPERATIVE, LA CROSSE BOILING WATER REAC-TOR. SHOW CAUSE PROCEEDING, Drxhet No. 50-409-SC, Prov. Op. Lac DPR-45, SilOW CAUSE, February 24, 1981; PARTIAL INITIAL DECISMN A
Upon caeclusaan of an evidentiary heanns on the nsk of allowmg the Lacrosse facihty to remain m operation without a ute dematenng system pendmg the Licenung Board's final determmation of the uze of the safe shutdown earthquake (SSE) for the facihty, the Licenung Board in this shom<ause proceeding determmed (1) no marrant exists for mstallation of a de=stenna system to preclude hquefactnn m the event of an earthquke producing prak ground acceleration at the ute of 0.123 (the Licenscis and Staffs assum d SSE); and (2) there is no undue ask to the pub 5c health and safety m permitung operanon pndente hte withcat mstallatmn of a site deestenng system in any show<ause prorMng anung a ter the grant of a construction permit but pnor to the award of f
B a full-term operstmg hcense, the hcensee snust bear the turden of proving comphance with Commisuon safety regulations" Corsurers Power Co. (Madland Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB-315,3 NRC 191 (1976).
C Earthquake mduced hquefacton, scismac hazard analyus (wurrence frequency).
q%; %q t
a? %
n jf
=2 %
Ii
DIGESTS ISSUANGS OF Tile ATO%f!C SAFL'IT AND LICENSING BOARDS O
i LBP-818 PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGifT COMPANY and ALLEGilENY ELECTRIC W*
(1sOPERATIVE, INC., SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. UNITS I AFD 2, Dmket No 54387 01, 54388 OL; OPERATING LICENSE, March 16, 1981, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
.;3;.,'
The tscenung Inoard rules on two of the apphcants' monons for summary dispmatum if vanous A
c,6*
contentums of an intervenor, granting one motion and partially grantmg the other motion.
B Where a pany moses for dismmal of contentums by surnmary dispoution, the C snmissson's summary dnpmtion rule directs the preuding omccr to render the decmon sought if the dhngs in the pnuedmg. dapmtums, ansmers to interrogatones, and admissions on file, together ed the statements of the partes and the affidavits,if an), show that there is rio genuine issue
- t:.ny matenal fact and that the movmg party is entitled to a decisuni as a matter oflaw l0 0 R 2.74 Nd).
C All matenal facts set out in the statement of matenal facts whKh accompames a summary dispution motion are deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the oppmmg party 10 CFR 2.749ta)
D Where motums for summary disptmition are suppined by amdavit,a party oppoung the motwn may not rest upon the mere allegatums or denials of his answer; his answer by amdavits or as otherwise provided must set forth spenfic facts sho mg that there is a genume issue of fact.10 CFR 2.749(b).
E When a respmse to a summary dnenstion motion has been provuled, the record and amdavits txxh supportmg and oppoung the motum must be viewed m the hght most favorable to the oppmng party.
Morcoser, the party seekms summary dispuntion has the burden of shommg the abwnce of a genuine assue of matenal fact, if at fails to do so, summary dispuntion will not be granted irrespective of the quahty of any respmse.
F Pnor to grantmg summary disomitum, the presidmg omccr must be convmced that there are no ugmf. cant outstanding unresolved questions matenal to the particular issue under review.
r -
- wu +
- f..y Y 1.%.
v
.a 12 I
-ms'
.we f {'\\ y
- L
i L
1i e
t O
t e
n is[
L
- i;:..,
?,
a
?
~
f DIGESTS DIRECTOR'S DENIALS t.
h f
DD-til 1 DUKL POW ER COMPANY. CAT A% H A NL: CLEAR ST ATION. UNITS 1 AND 2.
thwket No h413. 50-414. (10 C F R 2 206). SPECI AL PROCEEDING. January 4 1981. Dl-RI CTOR'S DFCISION UNDE R to Cf R 2 2tw A
The Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulatum denies a petituin filed under 10 C F R 2 200 of the
(,
Commmum'h regulations requessirig reopening of the safety phaws of the twensmg proceedmg for Duke 04 Power Company. Catambe Nuslear F mahty
[
H A petitum under 10 C F R 2 2On must wt forth facts thai ntabhsh a baus for takmg the propwed u
a6tum an addition to speafymg the rehef requated C
Absent a ugnificant shommg. calhng mio questu n pruw agency determmalums on mues the Laff s 11 not take actum under to C F R 2 206 to mstitute a proceedmg to further examme thew mues f-;
D As prosided in the Comm"uds June 1980 " Statement 4 Interim Pohey". the Sinff mill not take
~
se L a.ru set NE PA reuens m rnemw to a petitum y-e "$ r F R 2 206 m the absence of some "$pecial arcumstancest E
Bawd upm an enammaimn of rewne margm. the Catamba facmtics conimued to be needed i
j F
Stud loits, ne condenwr conumments v'~
DD 2 COMMON % EALTil EDISON COMPANY, ZION STATION. UNIT NOS I A N D 2.
Daket No M 295 % 304 SPECI Al. PROCEE DING. Icbruary 18. 1988. DIRECTOR'S rygcy, SlON l'NDER 10 CF R 2 20h f
A The Deressor of the OITwe of Nuclear Rea. tor Regulaium denied a requnt submitted by Polluten I
and Enuronmenial Problems Inc (PI P) pursuan' to 10 Cf'R 2 206 that the twenw amendment permittmg rerackmg and compactum of the lum Urist Nos 1 & 2 be suspended The Director found shal the mformatum submitted by Pi P. mucs raiwJ m a spect fuel pol espanuon proceedmg for another faahty and the pmibehty of future high burnup of nuclear fuel. did tot marrant suspenuon of the amendment DD-8 lJ PACif IC G AS & ELECTRIC CO. DI ABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POW'E R PLANT, UNITS I & 2. Dotket No M2. 3 M323. 5.'ECI AL PROCE EDING. March 26 1981. DIR EC-
[
TOR'S DE CISION UNDER 10 CER 2 206 A
The Direttor of Nuticar Reactor Regularmn denies a petition under 10 C F R 2 20h that requested speaal conuderatum of Claw 9 accidents and analyws of sescral safety syuems prmr to the Inensing of 5
the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Pomer H
As a pencral rule. perums muu be prnenied from uung 10 C F R 2 2t* as a vehicle for avoidmp an esisting forum where swun should be nwre logwally prewnted This prmople ss partwularly applwahle here, mhere lhe petinuiners are askmg the Director 10 take actions with ropect to matters that are k
pendmg before a twenung Board for rewiuton 6,
C the prossuons of 10 C F R 2 206 contemplate requests to institute proceedmgs m connettum mith thenses already in forte. not requnts to mstitute proceedmgs to conuder whether a hcenw should be granted m ihe far*: muance D
As prouded in the Commmum's June 1980 polwy statement. completed NE PA reuens need not be
[
reopened m the absence of speaal arcumuancn t
VNM,Q M - N'.
6
, F.1 $ '
. [d@Q;4 W
h
%W
~
y.r u
p
.s M
i l
1 m
O a
.a;
.c; r
r..
j..
in-V
.i [
[
.,c I
F LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES h
6r' A O 5mith Corp v f.T C. 510 l' 2d 515, 527-28 (3d Cir 1976) radiatum rnorinttwing prograrn cost or cornp(ing with rep >rtmg requirements nin irreparable mjury.
L.
uranium m.ll operaion usy demed. CLI 8I-4.13 NRC 3Oh (1981)
- i, Aherdeen and Rotkfnh R R.
NE PA mquiry, define "f ederal actum" required. AL AB-636.13 NRC 323 (1981)
Alabama Power Co (3.neph M farley Nancar Plant, Umts I and 2). ALAB 182. 7 AE C 210. 217 h
11974:
U~
summary dnpmton. timientain. no geriuine issue of material fact, trienant crits led to dniskm as i,
e matier of law. I HP 8 8-8.13 NRC 337 (1981) f:
Amerwan Medworp. Int.
Contmental Ilknots Naisonal Bank and Trust Company of Chicago. 475 s
F Supp 5. 7 (D li t 1977) radiainm rne nitonng program pasihihty of NRC policy thange not irreparable mjury, uramum mill
[,*
operaton stap denied. Cll-8' 4.13 NRC 303 (1981)
Andrus v Sectra Club 442 U S 347, 349, 364 65 (1979) p Eis requiremeni would improperly "traiahic" NEPA. ALAB-636.13 NRC 318 (1981)
- v..
Andrus
- Sierra Club. 442 U $ 349. 364-65 I-('
EIS not required, appropnatairi requests federal agencies not masiw Federal actum". ALAB-636 h"h 13 NRC.329 (19:11)
Arlmgfon Coahtum on Transportatum 6 Wipe. 4*8 F 2d 1323.1332 (4th Cir 1972) pre-NE PA protest. EIS required, nnhficatiorn to mitigate erivironenerital elTecis casily pinsible.
A L A B 636. 13 NRC.428 (1981) g.
Ashland (hl
- ITC. 4iN F Supp 297 307 (D C C.1976L afrJ. 548 I.2d 977 (D C. Cir 1976) 7 comphance. radiatum proiettum want:ards uran.3m mill operators sia) denied. irreparable mjury afnent. CLI 81.4.13 NRC 401 (1981) p/
iknton IJnon Co (Pilgnm Statoim. Ums 2L ALAB 269. I NRC 411. 412 (1975)
Ri*
[f.*
operstmg lwenw. summary dnpnitum contentum, meerlocutory appeal. required to amast "mitial decnam". Al AH 633.13 NRC 95 (19'il)
Ekneon Ednon Company (Pilgnm Nusicar Generatmg Power Slatum. Umi 2). ALAB 238. 8 AE C 656 p.
(Ot tober 22. 1974 H
constructum permit, evidennary pronedmg. non-timely mienentum petitne alTirmed. LPP-81 1.13 hi NRC 110 (19x1) tknson EJnon Company (Pilgnm Nuclear Generstmg Statnivi. Umi 2. ALAB-479, 7 NRC 774 (1978) conuructum permit, panial mesial decnum. hmited mork authoniathirt. satTwnpleie rettwd. ahernr'ne
,g' uis L HP-81-3. Il NRC 195 (1981)
[
Hurbank Anti None Group = Goldwhmidt. 62) F 2d 115. !!6117 (9th Ctr !980L cert demed. 49 D
U$LW 4616 (U S Mar 2. 1981)
NE PA retroactnity no change m enrenmmental untus quo, no LIS. ALAB-636.13 NRC 327 6
(1981)
Cahforma = Bergland. 483 E Supp 465. 4 tis (E D Cal 1980)
.{-
NE PA 10212h t h conuderatum of alternaines when [IS not othermne requ red. ALAB-616.13 NRC 312 (1981)
[
Can>hna Power & Lighi Co (Shearon 8tarrn Naleer Power Plant. Umts 14). CL1-79-10. IO NRC g
675 (1979 y
2 20h petnum suppicmental EIS. tiaw 9 actodents twie mandated under NRC pohcy. DD-813. l)
NRC 351 (1981) i
,g Carohna Pomer and Light Civnpany (Shearen liarrn Nuclear Power Plant. Units 1. 2. 3 and 4). CLI-7 c.g d..
79 5. 9 NRC ed)7 at edN (1979) t-
, (>g > f f constructam permn. foretaums power needs. LHP-81-3,13 NRC 158 (1981)
(
22.
Y f
- q-
.y
- 7..
w 15 1
<g
i i
LEGAI. CITATIONS INDEX h
CASES 9
i t
g Carolma Power arkt Laphe Company ($hearon llarns Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I, 2, 3. and 46
~
1BP 79-19,10 NRC 37 at p 41 (1979) p
, f.
2-
' i constrwtum prmir, best test M applwant's teshnwal quahricainiri., LBP-81-3.13 NRC 123 (1981) a constrwive perm:t, teshnkal qualifwatioris functamat test. IBP-8 8 3.13 NiiC 122 (1981)
'^-
Clescland Llettrw Illum natmg Co (Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Unds I and 2), ALAB443, 6 NRC
' +
4 741, 753 54 (1977)
' \\.1
- I conditu.ns governmg grant of summary dnpoutum, safety contentum, spent fuel shipments, LDP-81
.],
2.13 NRC di (1981)
I k
Cleveland f lesenc illummatmg Co. (Perry Nuclear Power Plant. Unds I and 2). ALAB443, 6 NRC 741. 752 54 (1977) summary dispoutum movant, burden of showmg absence of genume sasue of matenal fact. LEP 8.13 NRC 337 (last) h' Cornmatice for Auto Respc nuhihty v. Solomon. 603 F 2d 992,1002 a 43.1003 (D C Or.1979),
cert denied. 445 U S 915 (1980)
Intsahiatum at NI PA. no change, env onmental statua quo, no LIS reqmred ALAB436. Il NRC 326 (1981)
Comrrwmocalth I'diwn Company (La Salle, Umts I and 2L AL AB-153, 6 AE C 821 (1973) sigminant unrewived safety usue required to reopen hcenung heanng. DD-si-l.13 NRC 46 (1981) k Comerummealth famm Co (Zam Station, Umts I and 2). ALAB-Il6, 6 AE C 2.*8 (1973) operstmg twenu, dncovery meerlocutory, not appeal =%Ie, acceptatue of referrals. ALAB e34,13
{
NRC 98-91 (1981)
Comnwn=calth Fawn Co (Zam Staten. Unais I and 2), ALAB el6 12 NRC 419, 426 (1980)
I nwxlificatiori of spent fuel pimi, scope of beanns. nsues fairly rancJ, ALAB436,13 NRC 324-25 (1981)
Censolnisted Faiwn Co. (Indian Pomt. Umts I 3), CLI.75-8. 2 NRC 173,177 (1975) 2 2% petitum improper vehwie for reconuderstu>n <( previously decided issues. DD 81-I 13 NRC 47 (1981) 2 206 petiton, improper forum, facdity not yet licensed. DD-81-3.13 NRC 352 (1981)
Corolaisted 14non Co. of New York, Inc. (Indian Pmm Statum, Unit 2) 7 AEC 826 (1974) construttam perinat. consuleratum of sahotage inadmisubir, LDP-813.13 NRC 130 (1981)
Conwinisted Tanon Company of New York. Inc. (Indian Pant, Umts I, 2 and 3) ALA3436, 6 NRC 547, 624 (1979) construction prrmit, nenmic conuderstmns, ground accelciatum, LDP-813,13 NRC 155 (1981)
Consumen Power Co (Big Rock Pmnt Nuclear Plant), CLI-74-33, 8 AIC 221 (1974)
NRC environmental rewen. sper.t fuct storage, conuderatum of factors datingunhms thn plant from othm. ALAB 636,13 NRC 330 (1981) i Consumen Power Co (Midland Plant, Umts I and 2L ALAB il5. 6 AEC 257 (1973)
}
improper supplemental argument. AL AB436,13 NRC 322 (1981)
Consumers Power Co (M diand Plant, Units I and 2). ALAB-283, 2 NRC 11, IS,17 (1975),
clanfied on reconuderatum. ALAB-315, 3 NRC 101,112 (1974 show cause proceedmg, burden of proof, safety matters, LBP 817,13 NRC 26445 (1981)
Consumers Power Co (Mailand Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB438, 6 NRC 638 (1977) operstmg lwense dncovery, meerkwutory, run appealabic, acceptance of referrals, ALAB434,13 NRC 98 (1981)
Consumers Power Co (Pahsades Nuclear Power Facihty). ALJ aal.12 NRC 117 (1980) dncovery, NRC staff. esecuine pnvdege, LEP-814.13 NRC 234 (1981)
Consunwrs Power Co (Pahsades facihty). ALJ-841,12 NRC il7 (1980) operstmg twerine, discoscry. NRC staff, esecutive pn=dese, ALAl&634.13 NRC 223 (1981)
Consumers Power Company (Midland Plaat), CLI-74-27. 8 AI C 4, 6 (1974) operstmg hcense, dncover), interkwutory renvew. delay m adjudnatum. ALAB4 4,13 NRC 99 (1981)
Darryland Power Ccoperaine (la Crouc Boehng Water Reactor). ALAB-617.12 NRC 430 (1980) cocstructum permit, need for power, replacement of fasul-fuel plants. LBP-813,13 NRC 159 (1951)
Data Procesung scruce v. Camp, 397 U S 150.153 (19M) interventum as a matter of nght. LDP-811. Il NRC 30 (1981)
Detrmt T4mn Compay (thrwo Fermi Unit 2). LDP-78 il, 7 NRC 381 at 393 (1978) 50 57(c) license, no further envertnmental tmpact statement. LBP-815.13 NRC 230 (1981)
,5 A
W * :,,, ',.
iSb
- uwi l
gg s
s
'(
d.
I l
O LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES
.c g4' y Detroet Edison Company (Enrum Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Umt 2A LBP-78-13, 7 NRC $83 (1978),
- Y^,
a&d ALAB475, 7 NRC 752, 756 58, fa.19 (1978) enterventen constramts, antitrust aspects, sale of part ownership, nuclear power plant under con-structwn, LDP-81 1,13 NRC 30'31, 33-34 (1981)
Duke Power C4rapany (Catambe Nuclear Staten, Unita 1 and 2) LBP 75-34,1 NRC 626, 656666 (1975), ALAB-355, 4 NRC 397, 404414 (1976) 2.206 petiten to reopen saf erv heanns demed, need fm power, stud bolts issues prenousJy esplored.
DD-811,13 NRC 48, 57 (1981)
Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nuc. car Station, Units I & 2), DD-811 (Docket Ncs. 54413 & 50 414, January 9,1981 & Addendum, February 6,1981) 2.206 pennon, Class 9 accidents, renew for special circumstances, DD-81-3,13 NRC 354 (1981)
Duke Power Company (Oconee Nuclear Stauon, Urots I, 2 and 3), DIMv4, 9 NRC 66) (1979) facts consu'utmg basis of 2.2u0 pennon to reopen record not specified, DD'811,13 NRC 47 (1981)
Duke Power Co. (Oconee-McGuire) IBP-80 28,12 NRC 459 (Oct. 31,1980) pubiac participanon in renew of spent fuel shipment plans, LBP-811.13 NRC 43 (1981)
Duke Power Ca (Perkms Nuclear Stanon, Un:ts I, 2 and 3), ALAB-591,11 NRC 741 (1980)
Licensmg Board authonty to consader some aspects, spent fuel shipments, in operaung hcense proceedms, LBP-812,13 NRC 40 (1981)
Duke Power Company (Wilham B McGuire Nuclear Stataan. Umts I and 2), LBP 73-7,6 AEC 92, 10e 108 (1973), ALAB 128, 6 AEC 399, 401-404 (1973) 2.206 petiton to reopen safety heanns demed, stud bolts, ice condenser pessure supprea non con-tamn ent issues prenously esplored, DD-81 I,13 NRC 52, 54 (1981)
Duke Power Ca (Wdham B McGuire Nuclear Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-626,13 NRC 19 (January 6,1981) construction permit promedma, parnal imtsal decisaan, considerstaan of warrant for stay; ALAB432, 13 NRC 92 (1981)
Dusquesne Light Co. (Beaver Valley I), ALAB 109, 6 AEC 243, 246 (1973) summary disposition, failure of proponent to estabbsh genume issue of matenal fact, LBP-41-8,13 NRC 337 (1981)
Environmental Consequences of the Uranium Fuel Cycle. (Perkms Nuclear Statun, Units I, 2 and 3)
LBP-78-25, 8 NRC 87 (1978) construction permit, PWR, genene radon issue, " lead case"; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 181 (1981)
Firal Genenc Ennronmental Impact Statement on Handbng and Storage of Spent Light Water Power Reactor Fuel, NURE04575 (August 1979) consideraunn of altematives, spent fuel pool expansion; ALAB436,13 NRC 319 (1981)
Flonda Power & I;gnit Ca (St. Lucie Nuclear Power Plant Umt 2) DD-8433 Docket No 54389, Nov. 28,1980),
2 206 pention, Class 9 accidents, renew for special circumstances, DD-813,13 NRC 354 (1981)
Fnonda Power and Light Ca (Turkey Pomt Umts 3 and 4) 4 AEC 218 (1%9) construction prmit, considersuon of sabotage snadmissible; LBP-813,13 NRC 130 (1981)
Georgia Power Company (Alnn W. Vogtle Nuclear Plant Units I and 2), DD 79-4, 9 NRC 582 (1979) sigmficant unresolved safety issue required to reopen hcensms hesnng; DD-811,13 NRC 47 (1981)
Gawgia Power Company (Vogtle Units I & 2), ALAB-291, 2 NRC 404 (1975) 50.57(c) hcense, no further enwrone tental impact statement, LB0-41-5,13 NRC 230 (1981)
Orcene County Plannmg Board v. Federal Power Commission, 455 F.2d 412 (2d Car.) cert. demed, 409 U.S 849 (1972) pre-NEPA construction, power plant, EIS required only on post-NEPA power bnes, ALAB436,13 NRC 327 (1981)
Gulf State Uuhues Ca (Rsver Bend Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-444, 6 NRC 775 (1977) constructen permit, findmss of fact, genenc safety issues, predactive satanfactory umely soluten; LBP 813,13 NRC 134 (1981)
Outf States Utihues Ca (Raver Bend Station, Umts I and 2) ALAB-444, 6 NRC 760 (1977) prehcanng conference, tesung hcense, prticipauon by enterested state, requirement, acceptable con-tenuons; LBP-815,13 NRC 247 (1981)
Outf States Utihties Ca (River Bend Stanon, Umts I & 2) AI.AB444, 6 NRC 760 at 775 1977) t a
y construction permit, rules for consaderauon of unresolved safety issues, LBP 815,13 NRC 2H M'
M - R.((
(1981)
W T..'(
,; n A
17
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Henry v. Fede,al Power Commassen, 513 F.2d 395 (D C Or.1975)
I2QM
- j.
pre NEPA propert. EIS required, modificanons to miugate environmental effects easdy possible; ALAB436,13 NRC 328 (1981)
N.
Houston Lighung and Power Ca (Allens Creek Nuclear Genermung Stataan. Unit 1), ALAB-590,11
[
N R C 542 (1980)
?.
construction pernut entensmn, newly filed contention, short pilings issue not alude operstmg heense stage; LBP-814,13 NRC 255 (1981) 5 * *
]
Housum bahtmg and Power Ca (Allens Creek Staten. Umts I sad 2), AIAB-301, 2 NRC 853, 854 (1975) l constructon permit proceeding, warrant for.tay not consadered, hmited work authoruanon appal-able, ALAB-632,13 NRC 93 (1981)
Houston Ughtmg and Power Ca (South Texas Project. Umts I and 2), ALAB-381, 5 NRC 582, 589 (1977) health and safety asues beyond scope of anutrust hearmg, LBP 811,13 NRC 32 (1981)
Indiana and Michigan Electrw Ca (Donald C Cook Nuclear Plant, Units I and 2), ALAB-129, 6 AEC 414 (1973) scope, constructen permit extenson proceedmg, LBP-814,13 NRC 254 (1981)
Jocantla Apache Tnbe of Indians v. Morton, 471 F.2d 1275 (9th Or.1973)
EIS required for "further major Federal acton" on ptat NEPA, on-going project, ALAB-636,13 I
NRC 323 (1981) f Jones v. Lynn, 477 F.2d 885, 887, 890 (1st Or.1973)
EIS required for "further major Federal action" on post-NEPA, on gamg project, AMB-636,13 NRC 323, 326, 330 (1981)
Kansas Gas amt Electne Co. (Wolf Creek Genera mg Station, Uma Na 1), ALAB-279,1 NRC $59 (1975) condnaons determming sufficiency of request for NRC anutrust hearms, LBP-811,13 NRC 32 (1981)
(
Zansas Gas and Electnc Ca (Wolf Creek Nuclear Generstmg Staten. Umt Na 1) ALAB-327, 3 NRC 408, 413 (1976) dacovery, NRC stafl, interlocutory appeal, pubhc anterras imphcations, LBP.81-4,13 NRC 224 (1981)
Kansas Gas and Electnc Company, et al. (Wolf Creek Generatuig Station Unit Na I) ALAB-462, 7 NRC 320 (1978) constructon permit, forecastmg power needs, LBP413,13 NRC 158 (1981)
Kleppe v. Sierra Club, 427 U.S. 390, 399 (1976)
NEPA, regional EIS not required where proposed Federal actson not regional is empe; ALAB436, 13 NRC 329 (1981)
Umg Island Ughung Ca (Jamesport Stataan, Unsts I and 2), ALAB-318, 3 NRC 186 (1976) i operstmg bcense, dismvery, mterlocutory review, special circumstances, ALAB434,13 NRC 99
(
(1981) lens Island Ughung Ca (Shor ham Sta' son) 6 AFC 831 (1973) construction permit, cons.derston of sabotage snadmissable LBP-813,13 NRC 130 (1981) temsiana Power & hs'nt Ca (Waterford Steam Genersung Stauen Umt 3), CLI 73-7, 6 AEC 48 (1973) coriditions determmeg suficiency of request for NRC anutrust beanng, LBP-411,13 NRC 32 (1981) bnusiana Powet & Ught Co. (Waterford Steam Generating Statun, Umt 3), CLI 73-25, 6 AEC 619 (1973) conditions determmma sufficiency of request for NRC anutrust bearms; LBP-811,13 NRC 32 (1981)
Mame Yankee Atemic Power Ca (Mame Yankee Atomic Power Stauon) ALAB-161,6 AEC 1003, 1004 1010 (1973), remanded on other grounds, CLI 74-2, 7 AEC 2, 3-5 (1974) correcu e measure inponed on bcensee, demonstrable threat to public safety; LBP-811; 13 NRC 43 (1981) i Mame Yankee Atomic Power Cornpany (Mame Yankee Atame Power Stauon) ALAB-361,6 AEC 1003 (1973), affd sub nom., Otuens Power. Inc. v. NRC, 524 F.2d 1291 (D C Or.1975) i y
50.57(c) bcense, now power, no environmental unpact statement, LBP-815,13 NRC 229-230 (1981)
Mmnesota Pubhc Interest Research Group v. Butz, 498 F.2d 1314 (8th Or.1974) post-NEPA modificatann of pre-NEPA projects. EIS needed, major Federal actmn, spent fuel pool I
l expansen; ALAB436,13 NRC 316, 318-20, 323-25 (1981) l l
\\
'~j ;e).
i 1
l v...-
n
~
5;$
1
,4
O LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX 8
CASES
. ;e t hyg,-,
ci,g h $1, Mississippe Power & I.aght Co. (Grand Outf Nuclear Station, Units I and 2), AI.AB-130, 6 AEC 423 424-25 (1973) j summary disposition, failure of proponent to estabhsh genuine assue of matena! fact, LBP 81-8,13 NRC 337 (!*81)
Mustasappe Power and 123 t Ca (Grand Outf Nuclear Stanon, Units I and ?), ALAB-130, 6 AEC h
423, 426 (1973) annstructa permit estension, newly filed antention, short palmss issue not abide operstmg license stage; LBP 81-6,13 NRC 255 (1981)
Narmal An'n of Government Employees v. Rumsfeld, 418 F Supp.1302,1305-1306 (E.D Pa 1976)
NEPA, social or economm impacts not consadered to absence of environmental impact, ALAB436, 13 NRC 325 (1981)
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Morton, 458 7.2d 827, 837 38 (D C. Or.1972) consideranon of speculative alternate energy sources, not necessary of EIS, ALAB-429,13 NRC 81 (1981)
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Morton, 458 F.2d 827, 834, 837 (D C Or.1972)
NEPA mterpretauon, apphcatsor, " rule of reason"; A1AMM,13 NRC 325 (1981)
Nonh Dakota v. Andrus, 483 F. Sum 255, 260 (D. N. Dak.1980)
NEPA concerned with " reasonable forecasung" of andarect effects; ALAB.4%,13 NRC 325 (1981)
Northesis States Power Co. (Preane Island Generstmg Plant. Units I and 2), AI.AB-455, 7 NRC 41, 46 n e f:978), remanded on other grounds sub nom. Mmnesota v. Nuclear Regulatory C - - -
602 F.24 412 (D C Or.1979)
Incense amendment, major Federal actioc, duphcanve environmental reviews not required, "hmited ampe" argurient, ALAM36,13 NRC 31617, 319, 328 (1981)
Northern States Power Co. (Prairw Island Nuclear Generating Plant, Umts I and 2), ALAB 244, 8 AEC 857, 868 (1974), reconsiderata den:ed, Ai,AB-252, 8 AEC 1875,1177 (1975), affirmed CLI-I 751,1 NRC 1,2 !1975) l construccon pernut, cross <aammation barnd, standing to appeal, ALAB431,13 NRC 88, 90 j
(1981)
Northern States Power Ca (Praine bland Nuclear Generating Station, Umts I and 2), CLI 73-12, 6 AEC 241, 242 (1973), af!'d sub. nom. BPI v. AEC, 502 F.2d 424 (D C Or.1974) summary dispan, tion, failure of proponent to estabhsh genuine issue of matenal fact; LBP-81-8,13 NRC 337 (1081)
Northern States Power Company (Prairw Island Unsts 1 & 2A ALAB-455,7 NRC di at 46 sL 4 (1978) l 50.57(c) bcense, no further environmental impact statement, LBP-815,13 NRC 230 (1981)
Nuclear Engmeenns Company (5herfield Waste Disposal Site), AIAB-47), 7 NRC 737 (May 3,1978) entervention, anutrust heanng, as e matter of discreuen, LBP-811,13 NRC 33 (1981)
Offshore Power System (Flosung Nuclear Power Plants) CLl 79-9,10 NRC 257, 261 (1979) contmued plant operation. EIS required as a matter of NRC polry; ALAB434,13 NRC 328 (1981) 2 206 pention to reopen safety heanng, Class 9 a cadents, demed, DD-811,13 NRC 56 (1981)
NRC pohey, consideraten of Oass 9 acendenta, environmental revr.w; DD-81-3,13 NRC 352-53 (1981)
Par:fic Gas & Elec. Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plants, Umts I & 21 ALAB-Sl9,9 NRC 42, 46 (1979) 2.206 petiuun, environmental revww, special carcumstances, special charactensuca, Diablo Canyon, DD-81-3,13 NRC 355 (1981)
Pacific Gas & Electnc Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units I & 2) et al., DD 80L22,11 NRC 919 (June 1980) 2.206 petiurn. Class 9 accidents, revww for speciel circumstances, DD-813,13 NRC 354 (1981) i Pacific Oas & Electnc Ca (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant. Units i and 2h 11 NRC 411 (1981) disquahficauon of Comminanoner from adjudicatory heanng, CLI-81-1,13 NRC 2 (1991)
Pacific Oas & Electnc Co (Stamslaus Nuclear Project, Uts: I). LBP-77 26, 5 NRC 1017 (1977) car.adiuons determimns sdiciency of request for NRC anutrust beanng. LBP-81 l,13 NRC 32 (1981)
Pennsylvama Power & light Co. (Susquehanna Steam Electne Station, Umts I & 2), LBP 79 29,10 NRC 586, 589 (1979).
g# #
2.206 pennon, supplemental EIS, clasa 9 anrad-ts, not snandstad under NRC intene pahey; DD-
,y 4
813,13 NRC 351 (1981) ih W
- ys; ; ~
r Ab
~t t
3 19 4
i
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASLS Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (Susquehanna Statum, Umts I and 2), ALAR 613,12 NRC 317,
'P 321 (1980) operating hcense, discovery NRC stalT special circumstances, ALAB434,13 NRC 97, 99 (1981)
?-
Pharmaceutwal Manufacturers An'a v wemberger, 401 F. Supp 444, 449 (D D C 1975)
- g'.',,e radiation mamtonng program possibehty of NRC puhcy change not arreparable mjury, uramum mill
.p, f
operators stay denied CLI-814,13 NRC 303 (1981)
W c
Phdadelphia Elecinc Company et al. ALAB-480, 7 NRC 796 (1978)
J M!'
construcuan permit, use of " lead case" m genenc radon assue, LBP 813,13 NRC 183 (1981)
Port of Astona v. Hodel, 595 F 2d 467 (9th Cir.1979)
EIS required for "further major Federal action" on post-NLPA, on-going project, ALAB436,13 NRC 323 (19811 Portland General Elecinc Co. (Pebble Spnngs Nuclear Plant, Umts I and 2), CLI-76-27. 4 NRC 610, 613-14 (1976) intervention as a matter of nght, and as a matter of diuretum, LDP 811,13 NRC 30 and 32-34 (1981)
Portland General Electnc Co (Tropn Nuclear Plant) LBP 7840, 8 NRC 717, at 744 (1978), afrd ALARS34, 9 NRC 266, 287 0979) 50 57 c) luense, no further environmental ampact statement, LBP-81-5,13 NRC 230 (1981) t Ponland General Electnc Ca (Tropa Nuclear Plant), ALAB 531, 9 NRC 26) (1979) hccme arnendment, major Federal action. duphcaine environmental reviews not reqmred, "hmated scope" argument, ALAB436,13 NRC 316-I7, 319, 328 (1981)
Portland General Electnc Co. (Tropn Nuclear Plant), ALAB-534, 9 NRC 266, 287 (1979) assues beyond scope of heanng, ALAB-636,13 NRC 325 (1981)
Potomac Elcetne Power Co. (Douglas Point Nuclear Generstmg Station, Unns I and 2) ALAB-277, 8 NRC 539, 544-47 (1975) apphcants not required, to develop plan, spent fuel shipments far m future, LBP-41-1,13 NRC 42 (1981)
Potomac Electnc Power Co (Douglas Pomt Stauon, Units I and 2) 8 AEC 79 (1974) construction permit, conuderation of nahotage madmanible; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 130 (19811 Project Manageraent Corp. (Cimch River Breeder Reactor Plant), ALA&345, 4 NRC 212, 211 (1976) construction permit, crms-esammatum barred, standmg to appeal ALA&631.13 NRC 89 (1981)
Pubhc Service Co of Indiana Inc. (Marble }iall Nuclear Generstmg Stauon, Units I and 2), ALAB-405, 5 NRC 1190,1192 (1977) discretionary mterlocutory review pohey; ALAB435,13 NRC 310 (1981)
Pubhc Service Co. of Indiana (Marble Hdi Nuclear Generstmg Statum, Unns 1 & 2), DD-79-21,10 NRC 717, 724 (1979) 2.206 petition, improper forum, facihty not yet hcensed. DD-81-3,13 NRC 352 (1981)
Pubhc Service Co of Indiana, Inc. (Marble Hut Nuclear Generstmg Stanon Umts I and 2), ALAB 405, 5 NRC 1190,1892 (1977) discovery, NRC staff, interlocutory appeal, pubbt-interest imphcanons, LBP-81-4,13 NRC 224 (1981)
Pubhc Service Ca of Indiana, Inc. (Marble Hdt Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-316, 3 NRC 167 (1976) health and safety assues teyond scope of anutrust heanng, LBP-811,13 NRC 32 (1981) issues beyond scope of heanng, ALAB-636,13 NRC 324 (1981)
Pubhc Semce Co. of Indiana, Inc. (Marble Hal Statum, Umts I and 2), ALAB-405, 5 NRC ll%
1893 (1977) operstmg hcense, discovery meerlocutory, not appealable, acceptance of referrals, ALAB434,13 NRC 98, 99 (1941)
Pubhc Service Co of New Hampshire (Seabraok Stanon, Umts 1 & 2), DD 80L6, il NRC 371 (Feb.
19AO) 2.206 petition, Class 9 accidents, review for special evcumstances, DDL81-3,13 NRC 354 (1981)
Pubhc Servxe Co of Nc= Hampshire (Scabrook Statum, Umts I and 2), ALAB-271,1 NRC 478, 482-86 (1975) construcuon permit, crosasammanon barred, review of ruhng under dmted certificatum authonty; ALAB-631,13 NRC 89 (1981) reumuderatum of rulmgs m construchon permit, protealms sought via, directed certification.
ALAB-630, 33 NRC 85 (1981) int rlocutory appeal treated as pennon for directed certification, ALAB 625,13 NRC 15 0981) operstmg bcense, discovery, interlocutory rewew, special circumstances, ALAB-634,13 NRC 99 (1961) l l
,.?
e y. 4' y7 2()
yyst
\\
y:*..
O LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX
~
CASES dyk{;
- e
'*I rejection, contention. NRC staff propose supplement. Final EIS on Class 9 aanderts, A LAB 435 13 NRC 310 (1981)
Public Service Ca of New l{ampshire (Seabroom Station. Units I and 2), CL1-78 I, 7 NRC I, at p.
18 (1978) construction permit, reasonable assurance of funds; LBP-813,13 NRC 127 (1981)
Pubhc Service Ca of New Hampshire (Seabrook Station, Units I and 2) LBP 74-36, 7 AEC 877, 879 (1974) response, summary disposition motion, record and affidavits reviewed m hght most favorable to opposma party; LBP-81-8,13 NRC 337 (1981) summary disposition, safety of spent fuel shipments contention read in hght most favorable to proponent. LBP 81-2.13 NRC 41 (1981)
Pubhc Service Ca of Oklahoma (Black Foz Umts I and 2), ALAB-397, 5 NRC 1143 (1977) affirm-u.g m part LBP-77-17, 5 NRC 657 (1977) factors govermns grant of intervention as a matter of dacretion; LBP-811,13 NRC 33 (1981)
Pubhc Service Ca of Oklahoma (Black Fox Station, Units I and 2) ALAB-370, 5 NRC 131 (1977) mterlocutory appeal, denial of free transcnpt under procedural assistance program, be. red, ALAB-625,13 NRC 15 (1981)
Pubhc Service Ca of Okla. (Black Fox Station, Umts 1 & 2), CLI-868, il NRC 433, 435 (1980) 2.206 petition to reopen safety heanng. class 9 accidents, denied, DD-81-1.13 NRC 57-58 (1981) rulemakmg proceedmss, Class 9 accidents, exceptional case, plant proximity to man-made or natural hazards DD-81-3,13 NRC 353-54 (1981)
Pubhc Service Company of Indiana, Inc. (Marble Hill Nuclear Generating Statio i, Umts I and 2),
ALAB459, 7 NRC 179 at 186 (1978) construction permit. need for power, replacement of fossil-fuled plants, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 159 (1981)
Pubhc Service Company of New Hampshire (Seabrook Stations Units I and 2), CLI-77-8, 5 NRC 503 (1977) construction permit, alternauve sites reqmrements of hEPA, LBP-813,13 NRC 195 (1981)
Pubhc Service Company of New flampshire, et al. (Seabrook Station, Umts I and 2), ALAS-422, 6 NRC 33 at 90 et seq (1977) construction permit PWR. need for power, replacement of fossil-fuel plats LBP-81-3,13 NRC 159 (1981)
Pubhc Service Elec. & Gas Co. (Salem Nuclear Generstmg Station, Umt 2), PD-8017. Il NRC 596, 615 n. 21 (Apnl 1980).
mienm pohey statement, Class 9 accidenta, special circumstances, high population density; DD-813, 13 NRC 354 (1981)
Pubhc Service Electnc and Gas Ca 01 ope Creek Generstmg Station, Umts I and 2), ALAB-518, 9 NRC 14, 38 (1979) consideration of speculative ahernate energy sources not necessary in EIS. AIAB 629,13 NRC 81 (1981)
Puuic Service of ) mliana, Inc. (Martile Hd! Stanon, Umts I and 2), ALAB-405, 5 NRC 1192-93 (1977) opermanF bcense, discovery, mterlocutcr f review, special circumstances; ALAB-634.13 NRC 99 (1981)
Puget Sound Powet and Light Co- (Skagit Nucleer Power Project Units I and 2), ALAB-556,10 NRC 30, 32-33 (1979) construction permit, cross <sammation barred, standmg to appeal, ALAB431,13 NRC 89 (1981)
Rochester Gas and Electnc Corp (Sterhng Project. Unit I), ALAEL596 11 NRC 867, 869 (19't0) construction permit proceedmg termmated as moot; ALAB428,13 NRC 25 (1981)
San Francisco Tomorrow v. Romney, 472 F.2d 1021,1025 (9th Cir.197':
NLPA retroactmty, no change in environmental status quo, no EIS, AiAB436,13 NRC 327 (1981)
Segel v. AEC, 400 F.2d 778 (D C. Dir.1968) construction permit, consideration of sabotage inadmissible; LBP-81-3,13 NPC 130 (1981)
Sierra Club v. Hodel. 544 F.2d 1036 (9th Cir.1976)
EIS, required for "further major Fede-al action" on post-NEPA. on-g:nns project; ALAB436,13 NRC 323 (1981)
Southern Cahforma E6 son Ca (San Onofre Nuclear Generstmg Stauon, Units 2 and 3), ALAlk248, 8 AEC 957, 975-77 41974)
.:'y[g p [
NRC authonty, ascertain health effecta chlonne releases, included in crat/ benefit balance; LBP t, J
8,13 NRC 341 (1981) qps
(~
e,
.A
'4.
21
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES Tenneswe Yafley Authonty (Hartsville Nuclear Plant, Umts IA, 2A, IB, and 2B), AIAB463, 7 NRC 341, 347 48 (1978)
'Mi,
contennon, manne tuomans form as alternate energy sourm sammanly drsmissed as speculauve;
'W"b'-
ALAB-629,13 NRC 82 (1981)
'm Tennessee Valley Authonty (Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Units I & 2), ALAB413, 5 NRC 1418,1422 S[+ k@f (1977)
, i factors governing grant of mtervenuon, anotrust heanng, as a matter of discrenon; LBP-81-1,13
-?
"a NRC 33 (1981)
Toledo Edison Co. (Devis-Besse Nuclear Power Stanon), ALAB-157, 6 AEC 858, 859 (1973) construction permit, crosa<mammation barred, standmg to appeal, concrete injury to pers mal inter-ests ALAB431. Il NRC 89 (1981)
Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Staton), ALAB 300, 2 NRC 752, 758 (1975) summary dispossuon of smgle alternate energy source contenta allows (mahty to appeal; AIAB-629,13 NRC 77 (1981)
Tolato Edison Co. (DavurBesse Nuclear Power Staton, Unit 1), ALAB 314, 3 NRC 98, 99 (1976) ampe of pennon, directed certificanon, construction proceeding ruhngs; AIAB430,13 NRC 86 (1981)
Toledo Ednan Co. (Davis Besse Stauor? ALAB.300, 2 NRC 752, 758 (1975) construcuan permit proceedmg, warrant for stay not camnadered, hmsted work authemation appeal-aNe; ALAB432,13 NRC 93 (1981) t Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse Stauon), ALAB 300, 2 NRC 752, 76849 (1975).
operaung hcense, dmcovery ruhnes interlocutory, not spreslable; AIAB434,13 NRC 98, 99 (1981)
Toledo Edison Co. (Davis-Besse Station), ALAB-300, 2 NRC 758 (1975) l operstmg hcense, interlocutory appeals, ALAB434,13 NRC 99 (1981) i
}
Tnsty Eancopal School Corp v. Romney, 523 F.2d 88, 93 (2d Chr.1975) on remand. Tnnity Episcope School Corp. v. Harns, 445 F. Supp. 204 (S.D.N.Y.1978), rev'd and remanded sub norn.
Karten v. Hams, 390 F.2d 39 (2d Cir.1978), rev'd sub. nom. Strycker's Bay Nesshborhood Counci',
Inc. v. Karlen. 444 U.S. 223 (1980)
NEPA 102(2)(E), consideraten of alternauves when EIS not otherwise requaed, AIAB436,13 NRC 332 (1981)
Vermont Yankee Nuclesi Power Corp. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Staton), ALAB 124, 6 AEC 358 (1973) sigmficant unresolved safety issue required to reopen hcvsing heanng; DDL81-1,13 NRC 46 (1981)
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v Natural Resources Defense Council, 435 U.S. $19, 551 (1978) considersuon of speculauve alternauve alternate energy sm not necessary in EIS, AIAB429, 13 NRC 81 (1981)
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 319, 551 (1978)
EIS worth = bile if NEPA concept of alternauvea is feasible; ALAB436,13 NRC 329 (1981)
Virginia E3ectne & Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Stauon, Umts 1 & 2) ALAB-491, 8 NRC 245, 248 (1978) operaung hcense, rules for con Ecraten of unresolved afety issues, LBP-815,13 NRC 233 (1981)
Varsmia E3cetnc and Power Co. (North Anna Nuclear Powu Staten Umts I and 2), A1ABL584,11 NRC 451, 453 (1980) summary disposition response, to alternate energy sources contennon must contain, statement of materLJ facta, ALAB429,13 NRC 78 (1981)
Virgima Electnc and Power Co. (North Anna Power Staten Uruts I and 2), CLI.74-16, 7 AEC 313 (1974) discovery, NRC stat exceptional circumstances, to expedite proceedmg. LBP-81-4,13 NRC 221 (1981) operstmg bcense, discovery, NRC staff, exceptonal circumstances, A1AB434.13 NRC 101 (1981) operating hcense, discovery, interlocutory review "first-hand contact" of bcensmg board, ALAB434, 13 NRC 99 (1981)
Virgmts Electnc and Power Co (North Anna Staten, Units I and 2), AIAB.584 Il NRC 458,456-459 (1980) pentaan for review pendmg sub nom. Potomac Alhance v. Nuclear Regulatory Commis-soon (No. 80L1862, D C. Car., filed July 28, 1980) faaual basis, necessary to determme, unresolved confhets, alternauve uses of available resources.
ALAB436,13 NRC 332 (1981)
(
).V a M; cQ p:
t I
~
b
l I
l LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASES
, D ?-*
y,;-,
s-
- J Virgmia Petroleum Jobbers Ass'n v. F?C, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D C. Car 1958) stay demed, 3 of 4 factors failed, comphance, radiation protection standards, by uranium mill operators CLI 81-4,11 NRC 301 (1981)
Virginians for Dulles v Yo pe, 541 F 2d 442, 445, 446 (4th Or.1976)
NEPA, vastly expanded use of facihty, EIS required, ALAB436,13 NRC 326 28 (1981)
Washmston Metropohtan Area Tranut Commission v. Blohday Tours, Inc., 559 F.2d, 841, 843-44 (D C. Or.1977) stay denwd, 3 of 4 factors failed. comphance, radiation protectum standards by ursnium mill operators. CLI 81-4,13 NRC 301 (1981)
Westmghouw Ucctnc Company (Esports to the Phihppines), CLI-8414, ll NRC ell (19160), CLI.81-15,11 NRC 672 (1980), CLI-8430,12 NRC 253 (1980) emport licenu, interventum, s', suitat=hty, populatum densaty, genenc u sty issue not releiant, CLI-r 812,13 NRC 71 (1981)
Westmghouw Dectne Corp. (Esport to South Korea) CLI 8430,12 NRC 2!3 (1980) emport hcenw interventum, petitioner not entitled to beanns na e matter ni nght, CLI-812,13 NRC 70 (1981)
Westmshouse Dectnc Corp-, CLI 8414, Il NRC 631, 666 (1980y, CL1-80 30,12 NrC 253, 263 (1980) emport hcense, tasuance, dissentmg opinum CLI 812,13 NPC 74 (1981)
Westside Property Owher1 = $chleWDjer, $97 f.2d 1214 (9th Or.1979)
NEPA not retroective, no El3 required, ALAB4% 13 NFC 326 (1981) t I
$yl t'- '
c - .'~
~
Q$ Ef!
l N.;d l
. # #:. y
' wn.'> st * ? '
' 4 i
i l
l t
i L
O
-,1, e
y u
7-6 k
N
.?,
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGUIATIONS L
10 Cf R 2 applu.atum of peosswms to adjudissiory priseeshng on limg-serm safety issun. CLl-81 1.13 NRC 5 t
(1983)
L, 10 Cf R 2. App A. Pan IV b
depimiums NRC staff. *%hmg capedumms" herred. LBP.81-4 13 NRC 221 (1981) 10 CI R 2. App B h
conuructum permis. PWR, suuct ressemed, no wrious ckne quntawn, L DP 8 8-3.13 NRC 215 f.
(1981) shom (auw pn= ceding. Iempwary suspenwm of 12 764(a) and (b) nos appigable; LBP-81-7,13 NPC 290 (1981) 10 CF R 2 202(c) b r:o rnponw.arrented to Luenwe's conditumal heanns request.1 BP-817. 4 3 NRC 261 (l ?s')
l,: J 10 CF R 2 20h Jf conuructam permit entenum pnweedmg. remedy, newly fded congeniums. LBP-81-6.13 NRC 254 y.
(1981) 4, four cntena applied, supplemental IIS Cla*s 9 accktents. DD 813.13 NRC 354 (1981) pctiemm to require supplemental fl5. class 9 accidents, denied. impnyer forum, fa shty not twcowd.
DrL8! 3.13 NRC 3W52, 35t>$7 (1981) prtainin suspensoori of lisenw amendment pending E 15. high burnup fuel syni fuel storage pails DD-81-2.13 NRC 288 (1981)
[-
requoi lo reopen safety phaws of heenung pnweed ng demed. DD 81-1.13 NRC 45-49 (1981) i uw of show<adw order so quntum comphance, spent fuel shipment ufety plan. L DP-81 1.13
( {2 3
NR(' 43 (1981) 10 CF R 2 20hqd conuderation J Claw 9 acodents, no "sproal circumuante", petitum demed. DD 8 8 3.13 NRC 359 (1911) sntena ressemed m pctiemm to reopea ufety phaw ikenung heanns DD 811.13 NRC 46 (198ll
~
suspensuwi. Inenw amendment high-burnup fuel, spens fuel storage pu>ls, petisum demed. DD-812, 13 NRC 299.kn (1981) 10 CF R 2 704(t) conuructum permit pnmerdmg. micrkwutory appeal, dnquahfwatum of entire tmard aded. ALAB-i 610.13 NRC P6 (1981) h.;
daquahfhatum of entire twenung l= erd, demal referred, t BP-817 Il NRC 261 (1981) 4 10 CF R 2 70s. 2 709, 2 780, 2 7301c) sprni fuel pud enpanum, untimely rnemw. not m proper pleadmg form, oppmng rrkwum to unke supplemental matenal. ALAB 636 13 NRC 322 (1981) 10 CF R 2 714 50 57(0 rraitum, acteprante of nem contentwwi. LBP-81-5.13 NRC 23133 (1961) teums lwenw. timely Gled contentums, specifwity requirements. L BP-8 8-5.13 NRC 242 (1981) conuramts goserning meersentions antitruu aspects, sale of part ownership, nuclear p>mer plant under conurutsson. LBP-81 1,13 NRC 30. 33 (1981) rednectise emnuons conhng towers laic Gled consensums, lac k shommg. LDP-81-8,13 NRC 346 m
(1981) e 10 CF R 2 714(aMI) intmg twenw appinatums. prohibitum. T M1-related contentums. LBP-815.13 NRC 231 (1981) s g,.
10 CF R 2 714tbl h
,s
- : V, - r prehearms confererwe entmg Isenw. paniciparum by miernted uste, requirements acceptable con-p p....
teniums. LDP-8 8 5.13 NRC 247 (1981) i.
-w. :p~. A C
A y g.e.
I g
.i %
.?
I e.
- h.
p 2$
s t,
h e
6 n:/
)
l e
i f
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS o,,
10 CFR 2 715(c)
Mc. '
partacipaten by State of Oregon to modify hcense condton ocahng with control bu IJmg modifica-tion, ALAM27,13 NRC 21 (1981)
Q/j J
i testmg beenw apphcation, partepation by sateretted state, intervenors assues only; LBP-815,13 P
NRC 232, 246 (1981)
J Nt4-l P ~B" ' '
10 CFR 2 715(d) sprnt fuel pool espanuon, failure to move for leave to file Inef, acceptance as non party partici-pant. ALAIM36,13 NRC 320 (1981)
IO OR 2 717(b) authonto of Lacensmg Board to conuder ufety of spent fuel shipments, LBP-81-2,13 NRC 40 i
1 (1981) 10 CFR 2 718(g). 2 721(d), SI.52(d)
{
spent fuel pool espansson, sta# EIS, vehicle for contenung deficiencies, ALAB436,13 NRC 33) i (1981) i 10 CFF 2.718(i) constructon permit, crons+ amination barred, revww of ruhng cader directed certificatmn authonty; ALAB431,13 NRC 84 (1981) reconuderation of ruhngs m onstructon proceedmg sought via directed certi ication, ALAM30,13 f
NRC 85 (1981) directed certificataan, contention, NRC staN prepare Class 9 accident supplement Fmal EIS, A1AB-635,13 NRC 310 (1981) treatment of mterlocutory spieal demal of free transcnpt under procedural asustance program, as di etted certificanon pention, ALAM25,13 NRC 15 (1981) operatmg license, discovery, meerkrutory appeals, revww on "cerVicaten ", ALAB438,13 NRC 99 (1981) rejectum, contenton, NRC sta# prepare supplement, Fmal EIS on Class 9 accidents. nLAB435, 13 NRC 310 (1981) 10 CFR 2.720 sufficient showmg, dncovery, NRC stan, 2.206 petiuon, DD'813,13 NRC 356 (1981) 10 CFR 2.720th)ti) and (2) operstmg beenw. densation, NRC staN member, special circumstances, direct personal knomledge of matenal fact, ALAB434,13 NRC 98 (1981)
I 10 CFR 2.720thX2) dimcovery, depmuons, NRC staf, enceptwnal circumstances, LBP-81-4, !! NRC 217-18, 227, 228, 229 (1981) 10 CFR 2.720thX2Xis) operstmg hcenw, discovery, NRC sta#, interlocutory revww, ALAB-634,13 NRC 99,101 (1988) 10 Cf R 2 721(d) depminons, NRC staK, availabihty of Board members to resolve dispute, responwa by telephone; LBP-81-4,13 NRC 220 (1981) 10 CFR 2.730(f)
NRC pohey dnfavonng interkrutory revww, baue structure of proceedmg not aNected ALAB435, 13 NRC 314311 (1981) depnutons NRC s'an, mterlocutory appeal, pubhc mterest tmphcatmns, LBP-81-4,13 NRC 235 (1981) meerkrutory appeal, denial of free transcnpt under procedural asustance program, barred, ALAB-625,13 NRC 15 (1981) operstmg hcense, interlocutory appea! referral, pubhc mtemt emphcatsons, ALAB434,13 NRC 98 (1981) partopation, sucrlocutory appeal, environmental revww, spent fuel pool espanuon; ALAM16,13 NRC 315 (1981) referral of ruhrig, rejectmg intervenor's contecten, NRC staff prepare Class 9 accident suppicment, Fmal EIS, ALAb-635,13 NRC 310 (1981) sumnv.,y ckspmten of s ngle ahernare energy source contenten, permits appeal, ALAB429,13 NRC 77 (1981) 10 CF7 2.732 proponents show cause order, bur 4n of proof, LDP-817,13 NRC 264 (1981) 10 CFR 2.740 operstmg hce iw, discovery, NRC staff, adminuble evidence, ALAB434,13 NRC 100 (1981) i 13 CFR 2 744(e) (1774)
I operstmg hcenic. discovery, NRC staff, mterlocutory revww: ALAM34,13 NRC 99 (1981)
.4,,s.,
I Jr
,f 3: a ~i
+
26 pg
O LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX t
REGULATIONS 63:
?
. f. ',
summary d2poutxm of shernate energy source contenton, requirements for accompanymg state-ment, ALAB429,13 NRC 77 (1981) condinons g<r *rnmg grant of summary dupmitson, safety contenton, spent 4uel shipment. LBP-81-2, 13 NRC 40. (1981) summary dispos tion, durnissal contentons, no genume tasue of matenal fact, chlonne discharge, radioactive emmissions from coohng tower; LDP-81-8,13 NRC 337 (1981) 10 CFR 2 749(a) property supported monon for summary dupoutum assected by statement of matenal facts, aMda-vits. ALAB429,13 NRC 78 (1911) summary dispositum motaan, matenal facts statement admitted unless controverted by opposition, LBP.al.8,13 NRC 337 (1981) 10 CFR 2.74Hb) alternate energy sources, statement of matenal facts, summary dupossten, response, need for spect.
Scity; ALAB429,13 NRC 78 (1981) summary disposaten motion supported by affidavit, answer must set forth specific facts LBP-81-8, 13 NRC 337 (1981) 10 CFR 2.74Hd) conditions governmg grant of s mmary dispoutum, safety contention, agent fuel shipment; LBP-81-2, 13 NRC 40 (1981) summary disposition dismissal, contentions, no genuane assue of matenal fact, movant entitled to decismn as matter of law; LBP 81-8,13 NRC 337 (1981) 10 CFR 2.750Ec) procedural assutance program precluded by statute; intervenor denied free transenpt, ALAB-625,13 NRC 14 (1981) 10 CFh 2.760 and 2.762 operstmg bcense, summary disposition, contennon, interlocutory appeal, required to await "mtitial decision"; ALAB433,13 NRC 94 (1981) 10 CFR 2.760s conditums governmg grant of summary duposinon, safety contentons, spent fuel shipment, LBP 2,13 NRC 41 (1981) 10 CFR 2.762(a) monon for directed certificanon of amstruction proceedmg ruhng devoid of precise record refer-ences ALAIM30,13 NRC 85 (1981) 10 CFR 2.764 truual decumns directmg amendment of constructum permit, operstmg trense, effective immediately, ALAB426,13 NRC 18 (1981) 10 CFR 2.788(e) preheanns conference, motaon for stay demed, lack of showmg. LBP 81-5,13 NRC 289 (1981) factors mfluencmg grant c( stay of effectiveness, Ixensms acton; ALAB426,13 NRC 18 (1981) 10 CFR 2.802 pention for rulemakmg, preparaton, genenc EIS, nanonwide use, high-burnup fuel, DD-812,13 NRC 299 (1981) 10 CFR 2A bcensms requirements basis for demal, 2.206 peutson, supplemental EIS, Class 9 accidents, DD-81-3, 13 NRC 352 (1981) 10 CFR 20 NRC proposef amendments, late comments filed by uranium mill operators, CLI-81-4,13 NRC 300 (1981) constructon permit, PWR, radiological esposures to pubhc; LBP 813,13 NRC 200 (1981) uranium nulla, control of radioactive effluents, as low as reasonably achievable, CLI-81-4,13 NRC 302 (1981) 10 CFR 20.l(c) construction permit, PWR, radioactive enussions, as low as reasonably achievable; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 173 (1981) 10 CFR 20.33(f) construction penrut PWR, Gnancial qualiscatums, " reasonable assurance"; LBP-813,13 NRC 127 (1981) 10 CFR 2040$
NggC uramum null operators, contentions, proposed reportmg requirements, ri,diatxin protee an standards,
.Lw CLI-814,13 NRC 300, 306 (1981)
^-
w y 4
1
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS O
10 CFR 40, App A uramum mills, radistum protectKm standards, monitonng program, conustent with UMTRCA regu-latums CLI 81-4,13 NRC 305 (1981) 10 CF R 50
- g.;
construcium permit, P% R comphance. common defense and secunty entena, LBP-813,13 NRC sc' 130 (1981)
'g[ s ?
construction permit, PWR, technical quahrxatums, knowledge of Federal Regulation LBP-813,13
-~'N NRC 121 (1981) coserage not estended to safety aspects of spent fuel dupments. LBP-812,13 NRC 40 (1981) 10 CFR 50 App A quahty assurance, preheanng conference, testmg hcense, contentam demed. LBP-8l A,13 NRC 239 (l*41) 10 CFR 50 App I construcaton permit, PH R, contentson, legahty of Sec.II D, LDP-813,13 NRC lli (1981) 10 CFR 50 and 70 2 200 petitum to reopen safety heanns densed, measures taken to prepa*e for nenous accident DD-811,13 NRC 61 (1981) 10 CFR 50 App. A constructum permit, PWR, deugn cntena, poner gnd connection, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 118 (19811 constructum permit, FWR, deugn cntena, statum service, fire protectum. LBP-813,13 NRC 120-121 (1981) construction germit, PWR, steam generator tubing entene, LBP-813,13 NRC 135 (1981) 10 CFR 50, App. B e.entum, compliance not demonstrated segardmg QA, LBP-81-5,13 NRC 237 (1981) constructum permit PW R, quahty assurance entena, LBP 813,13 NRC 122 (1981) constructwo permit, PWR, mspecton requirements, LBP-813,13 NRC 140 (1981) 10 CFR 50, App. C constructum permit, PWR, financial quahficaricmx " reasonable assurance", LBP-813, 83 NRC 127 (1981) 10 CFR Part 50, App. D NRC pohey, supplemental EIS. Class 9 accident, DD-81-3,13 NRC 35152 (1981)
}
constniction permit, PWR, amendment, accidents, environment, radiologwal eff'ects, LBP-813,13 NRC 199 (1981) construction permit, comphance, environmental matters, LBP-813,13 NRC 157 (1981) 2.206 petition to reopen safety heanng Class 9 accalents denied, DD-811,13 NRC 56 (1981) 10 CFR 50 App I constructen heanng, contention relatmg to legahty of Sec II. D. LBP-81-3,13 NRO Ill (1981) construction permit, P% R, comphance, numencal guidehnes, radmaste system, LBP-813,13 NP.C 121, 141 144, 207 (1981) constructum permit. PWR, routme emisuon doses, LBP-813,13 NRC 178,181 (1981) 10 CFR 50, App.1. Il D construction penod, PW R, radmaste system, comphance man-rem salues LBP-813,13 NRC 141-142, lit 207 (I?!!)
10 CFR 50, App K construction permit, PH R, emergency core coolmg, esaluaron model, LBP-813,13 NRC 117 (1981) 10 CFR 5010le)(l), t 2) constructairi permii proceeding, limited work authonzation, findings required. Al AB-632,13 NRC 92 (1981) 10 CFR 50.13 construction permit, PWR, conuderation of sabotage inadmisuble; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 130 (1981) 10 CFR 50 34(a) construction perxx1, PWR, mdmdual esposure lumts, unrestncted area LBP-81-3,13 NRC 143 (1981) 10 CFR 50.34(aXI) constructxm permit, PWR, sate suitabihty, genlogy, seismology; LBP 813,13 NRC 153 (1981) to CFR 50.34 tam 4) construction permit, PWd, emergency core coohng, esalaation model, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 117 (1981) l
,",E#$_.,
san i C 9 O([
M
~;,,
D ' '
(
1 E
O LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS Or pC?
sf M
@E "Q~.
Lacenssng Board authonty to consider some aspects, spent fiael shipments, m operstmg hcense e,,,
j proceedmg, LBP-81-2,13 NRC 40 (1981) 10 CFR 50.34a construction permit, PWR, design cntena, radwaste; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 128 (1981) 10 CFR 50.35(a) construcuan permit, PWR,comphance with health and safety entens desenbed, LBP-81-3,13 NRC115, 116-121 (1981) cons:ruction permit, PWR, provision comphed with, LBP-813,13 NRC 213 (1981) 10 CFR 50.40 and 50.57 spent fuel shipment, sabotage, trammg of populace for accident, contention dismissed, LBP-812,13 NRC 42, 43 (1981) 10 CFR 50 40(b) construction pernut, PWR, apphcant's technacal quahficauons, LBP-813,13 NRC 122 (1981) 10 CFR 5044 excessive hydrogen generanon issue rejected en 2.206 petitaon to reopen safety hearms, DD 81-I,13 NRC 54 (1981) 10 CFR 50 45(b)(1) and (3)
TMI, claddmg specificanons exceeded, LBP-815,13 NRC 241 (1981) 10 CFR 50.46 preheanng conference, testmg hcense, LOCA, madequate protectson, contention denied, LBP-88 5,13 NRC 241-42 (1981) 10 CFR 50 46 tax 1) construction permit, PWR, emergency core coolmg, evaluanon model; LBP 813,13 NRC 117 (1981) 10 CFR 3d.55(a) construction permit, PWR, design conformance, steam generator tubes; LBP 81-3,13 NRC 136 (1981) 10 CFR 50.55(aXh) preheanns conference, tesung hcense, compiction, protection system action contention demed, LBP-815,13 NRC 242 (1981) geheanng conference, testmg hcense, no direct saw a;.t water levels, fuel assembhes, conten-tion accepted, LBP-81-5,13 NRC 252 (1981) prehearing conference, tesung bcense, reactor coolant pump controls madequate, contention denied, LBP-815,13 NRC 239 (1981) 10 CFR 50.57(c) preheanns conference, tesung hcense, supplemental operator training, reduction of foreign cd depen-dence, subjects denied, LBP 815,13 NRC 260 (1981) testmg hcense apphcation, contested proceedmg, relevant contenuons; LBP-81-5,13 NRC 228, 230, 212 233, 248 (1981) 10 CFR 50.59 reporting of changes to authorued plan, control buildmg inodificanon; ALAB-627,13 NRC 2122 (1981) 10 CFR 51 construction peruut, PWR, environtr-atal matters, provtsaan comphed with; L3P 813,13 NRC 157, 213 (1981) cont;nued plant operataan. EIS required as a matter of NRC pohey; ALAB44,13 NRC 328 (1981) spent fuel pool expansson, EIS not required ALAB436,13 NRC 318 (1981) spent fuel pool expansion, mdirect environmental effects. ALAB436,13 NRC 324 (1981) spent fuel shipments, contennon involves safety rather than environmental impacts; LBP-812,13 NRC 40 (1981) 10 CFR St.20(e) construction permit, PWR, cost 4enefit analysis, unpact, uramum fuel cycle, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 202 (1981) 10 CFR St.20(s) and (d) p et canns conference, testmg hcense, no designed protection "C2 ass 9 accidenea," contention de-ferred, LBP-815,13 NRC 244 (1941) 10 CFR 56.20(e) and (31 x(,y y construcuan pe: nut, PWR, uranaum fuel cycle, environmental effects, LBP 813,13 NRC 183 (1981) e
.If
%)% -
.g
'1,
\\
/
f
LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS 10 CfR SI.20Q)
,, 'T,..,,
comeructon pernut. PWR, coat-twncfit analyms, environmental efhets, transportatwn, nuclear maten-
,-[
w,
al, LBP 813,13 NRC 202 (1981) j;
~.
constructon gnmt PWR, environmental ampact, transportatxm of nuclent fuel, LBP-88-3,13 NRC is2 (1981)
D ;;1 10 GR St.20rg(2)
- t g g
constructwn permit, PWR, environmental ampact, transportation of nuclear fuel, LBP-813,13 NRC K'.i 182 (1981) 10 CFR 515(bX3) operstmg hcense, less than full power, environmental unpact statement, LBP-815,13 NRC 229 30 (1981) 10 GR 515(cMI) operstmg hcense, less than full power, environmental impact statement not required, LBP-815,13 NRC 229 (1981) 10 GR 51.52(cM3) cost / benefit Gndmgs required for hmited work authonzaton; ALAB-632,13 NRC 92 (1981) 10 GR Sil operstmg hcense, less than full power, environmental impact statement, LBP-81-5,11 NRC 229 (1981) 10 CFR 51.7(b) spent fuel pool expanson, use of staff environmental analyus as record support, ALAB 636,13 NRC 331 (1981) 10 CFR 71 constructkm permit PWR, nuclear matenais, shipments, packagms standards, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 182 (1981) spent fuel shipment, container design requirements not automatully subyct to htigation an operat-mg hcense proceedmg, LBP-81-2,13 NRC 37, 40, 43 (1981) 10 G173 comention, phyncal protectio:n, nuclear plants, matenals, preheanns conference, testmg hcense, ac-e tion deferred, LBP-81-5,13 NRC 236 (1981) spent fuel shipments contamer design requirements not automatically subject to htigsten in operat-tng hcenw proceedng, LBP-81-2,13 NRC 40, 41, 43 (1981) e I
10 CFR 73 37
(
bcensees required to prepare plan for phyucal protection spent fuel shipments, LBP-812,13 NRC 41 43 (1981) spent fuel shipment, sabotage, traimns ci populace for accident, contenton dismissed LBP-81-2,13 NRC 41 (1981) 10 CFR 73.37(bgl) submtsanon of plan, phyncal protecten, spent fuel shipment, to NRC; LBP-83-2,13 NRC 41 (1981) i 10 CFR 73.55
{
construction permit, PWR, sabotage, pnar ruhngs at vanance; LBP-813,13 NRC 130 (1981) construction permit, PWR, theft and industnal sabatoge, phyncal protection objectives LBP-813,13 NRC 131 (1981) 10 G'R 73.72 submisuon of plan, phyucal protecten, spent fuel shiptnent, to NRC; LBP-812,13 NRC 41, 43 (1981) 10 GR 100 constructon pernut PWR, site critena, LBP-81-3,13 NRC 115 (1981) construction permit, PWR, conformance, offute radiological ~9--wa design basis accidents, LEP-813,13 NRC 121 (1981) construction permit, PWR, fulfillment of phyncal protection objectives; LBP-81-3,13 NRC,131 (1981) constructen permst, FWR, ste suitatnhty, radiological domes, design baus accidents, LBP-813,13 NRC 145,147,149 (1981) population distnbution not a special circumstance requinns EIS, Class 9 accidents, DD-413,13 NRC 355 (1981)
{
2.206 Ivtiton to reopen safety beanng, Class 9 accidents, demed. DD al-1,13 NRC 61 (1981) 10 CFR 100 App. A constructen permit, PWR, ste suitabihty, gmk>gy, scismology; LBP-813,13 NRC 153,155 (1981) contenton, ansmic safety, prehcanns conference, testmg hcense, acton deferred untd mitial decismn, LBP-815,13 NRC 236 (1981)
!&.g W;
t f
4 L
e LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGULATIONS fi ;.,.
s
, ig%p,* d pi 10 CFR 73.37(b)(4)
-J
- advance revww, plans for escort trainmg, licensee's cxxnmumcation center, spe-t fuel shipments; eg,ns"; j LBP-81-2,13 NRC 43 (1981) 10 CTR 500.10(c)(1) constructen permit, PWR, site suitabbry, geology, seismology; LBP-813,13 NRC 153 (1981) 10 CFR 100.ll(a) constructon permit, PWR, sate suitsbehty, low populaten zone; LBP 88 3,13 NRC I46 (1981) 10 CFR 110 44(a)(2) emport hcenvs issued, no matenal chan8ed circumstances, CLI-812,13 NRC 72 (1981) 10 CFR 110.84(a) emport bcense, discretionary heanng not in pubiac inscrest, CLI-81-2,13 NRC 71 (1981) 40 CFR 190 implementation and enforcement, radiaton protectmn standards, uramum mill operators stay monon denud, CLI-81-4,13 NRC 301307 (1981) uramum nuth, petitson to reconsider and resne radiation protecton standards, CLI 81-4,13 NRC 299, 300 (198I) 40 CFR 1502,16(a) and (b) spent fuel pool expannaan, EIS should include darect and indirect eMects, ALAB436,13 NRC 325 (1981) 40 CFR 1508 8(a) and (b) spent fuel pool expanson, direct and indirect effects; ALAB436,13 NRC 324, 326 (1981) 49 CFR 871179 construction perrmt, PWR, conformance nuclear matenals slupments, LBP-81-3, ;3 NRC II2 (1981) 4 I
8@Nff[.i
? %9
': W _y l-lt' ;,
1 x n
f
[
]
9
[
p-t h:
n
, m, g..,
- p. -
u,g. ;,k Iy LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX b
STATUTES t
Admemstrative Pnuedure At-i. 5 USC 556td) b prop nents. show cauw order. LBP-81-7.13 NRC 264 (1981) f Atomw i nergy As-t 126a (2 N b) empirt twenws. nuticar non prohferatum, no malenal changed circumuances. CLI-81-2. I3 NRC 72 4
(19811 p-AtornK Energy Act 127. 128 r.
i capirt twenws. determnaram of matenal changed circumuances. CL1-sl.2.13 NRC 68. 72 (1981) f Atornic Energy Act 1894 lwenwng requirements ham for denial. 2 20h pristion, supplemental EI5. Class 9 accidents. DD Wr
- 3. Il NRC 352 (l981) p Atomw Energy Act of 1954189(a) as amended e '.
caport inenw. meersenor not entiiled so hearms as a matter of nght. CLI-8 5-2,13 NRC 70 (198l)
N-Atomic Energy Act d 194.105c. 42 USC 2135(t W 5) 2' amitruu conterns adswe inwn Ariorney General. Li P-al-l.13 NRC 29 (1981)
E nergy and Waler Development Appropnatum Act of 1981. 302. Puh L No 96-367. 94 Sea 1331 Q~
6 I'
1345 pnwedural asmeance program deshng with meersenors nghi to free transcript precluded. ALAH-625. Il NRC 14 (19%))
E nergy Reorganisatnin Act 201. 42 U S C (3841 Commmumer absent. actum determmed by mapnty vote. members prewnt. CLI Hi 3.13 NRC 297 (1981). Cll-81-4 13 NRC h)7 (198ll Iederal W ater Pollutum Contnil Att {l01. Mm. 307 g,
construttuin permat. PW R. propwed tuilant discharge. certifwatum. state diverwm of Water P<diu-r, -
tion Control. LNP Bl.). 13 NRC 201 (1981)
<Y Natumal i nsinmmental Polw) Act (NFPA). 102(2WC) 42 U S C 4332(2MC) reutor lwenwd pruir to enactment. lwenw amendment to enpand spent fuel pel requires EIS.
[
i Al All 616 13 NRC 314. 317. 328, 332 (1981)
C Narnmal i nsinmmensal Polw) Att 102(2NI.). 42 USC 4132(2)(F) contentum, environmental owns cateed benefits propwed spent fuel pud espanwm. ALAH-636, 1)
NRC 317 (19 Hit
{'x spent fuel pul espanwm. tonskleratain of alternatives when no EIS required. ALAB-616,11 NRC 317-21, 31132 (191t1)
Nrnmal i nveronmental Policy Act of 1969 (NFPA) 102(2NC) t'"
conuruttom permil. PW N. mapr federal actaiti, crisironmental mattets provisions cornpised with.
{,
L DP Mi-3.13 NRC 157.195. 213 (1981) 1.,
Nuticar Non Pnihrerstmn Act. 2sb). 22 USC 320!th) empirt twense. duretumary heanns denied mconmient with US image of rehahic supplie of nucle-ar matenals. Cl3 81-2.13 NFC 72 (1981)
Power Plant and Induunal F uel Use Act of 1978. P L 94620, 92 Stai 3289 p
9 P% R. replacement M fowl fuel plants unable lo meet pillation control require.
conuructum permit.
ments i RP 81.l.13 NPC 159 (1981)
Reorganuarum Plan No 3 of 1970. 84 Stat 2086. 42 U S C A 4121 k-note transfer of ALC authoney in E PA to estahlish indsatum protectum uandards CL188 4.13 5.s NRC tm (1981)
\\
Taiwan Relatums Act of 1979. 22 USC 1101
,,,5:
esport twenw. pristniner raises issues of nuclear rwm prolif-ratuwi. diplomatic relatums CLI #1-2.13
,5 a
q-NRC 71 (1981)
- Tf%.y t p;t
' p g,
- t..
'... '.,f
,+
v Q f. '
r,
. em.
1 i
E
I l\\
i I
LEGAL CITATIONS INI'EX G
STATUTES i
r e
i
(
Uranium Md! Taihngs Rad.aton Control Act d 1978
,, ;yJy.,
constency d regulatons with 10 CFR 40 componed montaanns requirements, CLI-81-4,13 NRC
,1 300, 305 (1981) d
,0 t
e I
r i
}i I
l l
I
(
.+
t,' s i
-93$_pM
. ". ',l ] $,.
u
~
x..
. a k
l
a O
kh3',
cF.',.
, ~;y -
m~s,..'
r<
- ~,
- r t-.g LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX OTIIERS i
30A Mau Ann Lams (1443) constructum permit. P% R. compliance mater pollutam conirol legniatum. L HP-8 8 3.13 NRC 202 (l984) 4 Mixwe's f ederal Practice (1979 ed ) f26.56{4) y operstmg license, aewoser). depment as gestimonial witness. ALAB4M L' NC C l(X) (1981)
Energy Reorganizatum Act 203, 42 U S C. 5841 L
TMI-1. Commiummer abwnt. actum determined by mapnty sote. members prewns. CLI 88-3.
(
Federal Rules of Cml Praedure. Rule 56 summary dnpsitum, disminal, contentums. no genuine inue cf matenal fact mosant entitled so decisum as matter of law. LBP-81-8.13 NRC 337 (1981) p.
I 7.
k.
t b 'E '
i-.
', a d
> 4 b
?
?
L.
Y:
t L
'?
1 '
h'
=.;k
- ".j',_
+
i _
2.+,-
't? ' g%, ; e.
a-
- V g e ' +,e,
/t: J #p t
35 m,
4 g
l
h.
f.
t O
.] :e.
f n
s.,\\
W:,
k-b y SUIMELT INDEX 1
l ACCIDEN1%
Claw 9. spra I conuderatum. 2 2tus pentum demed. improper forum facihty emi inensed. DD-81-3.
l 13 NRC 149 (19 Mil ADJL DIC4 TION f
wfets. shuidown. population denus) mienm operaism. CLI 81-1.13 NRC 1 (19811
(
AI.TE RN 4TF FNI RGY SOL'RCL summary dnpoutum, contentum, manne buwnaw form. ALAB 629.13 NRC 75 (1981) t ANTIIRL'5T request for hearms wie of part ownership, miersentum. dncretenary, standmg. LDP-88-l 13 h C F
27 (19411 APPF41_%
i mierks utory prisedural awniante program. illegahiy of free transnpt. ALAH425.13 NRC 13 h
(1981)
I, interkwulory, constructum permit. standing. concrete mjury to personal mierests directed certifwa-I tum denied AL AH 631.11 NRC 87 (19811 mierks uiory. ograimg luense. summary dnpoulmn of contentum, dnmmed for mant of junsdic-
[ ';,
sum. A L Ali 613.13 NRC 94 (1981) meerktutor) umvhancous seekmg of. directed certifkatuut and appellare retien. !=urd as " day-tm M,
day momfor of numerous determinatunn". ALAB 610.13 N RC R4 (19N1)
APPFI LATL RLilF W i
r ruimg retetimg nml for i mal [IS supplement. Claw 9 accklents diretted terrifwaton demed.
r AL Alt 615.11 NRC VN (1981)
AIC\\ llc S4lth A 1.lCL%SINGllO4RD larnung utum. wa). amendmeni of Part 2. ALAH-626.13 NRC 17 (1981) 1-Bt RDEN OF PROOF show s'ause pr<scedmg. wnmic conuderainms contmucd reactor operati m. no ute demalermg sys-lem. [ HP pl-7.13 NRC 2h8 (1981)
Clll ORIN F summary dnpnitum, consentums health effects desharges to Susquchanna Roer. rrmtum partially g ranted LBP 818. I t NRC 3.15 (19N1)
CONN 1Rt CTION PE R\\llT eswicntury prmredmg. radiological heshh and safr% matiers ute suenahihi). ensironmensal matters conteniums partial imtul deuwm. LitP 813.13 NRC 101 (1981) cuenuon prmeedmg. admnubihty of contenton, short pihngs swue. denied. LHP-814.13 NRC 264 il9 mil n
l mierkwutory appeal. directed certification and albed rehef demed. ALAlt 610.13 NRC 84 (1981) h pencedmg. m.arr.at for sta). hmited work au'honninin ALAB 632.14 NRr' 91 (1981)
CONNIRL CilON Pt R\\lliN sermmaico as moot. applwant's decnon not to construct. ALAH 628.13 NRC 24 (19 mil (UNT E NTIONS admnuhehty. short phng mue, conuru.imn permii entenuon g.rmecdmg. LBP-814.13 NRC 264 (19 Nil constru6 ion permit. cudentiary prmcedmg. radmlogical be.hh and safety matters ute suilshihiy.
ensironmental masters contentions partial initial decnion. LHP.813. O NRC 103 (19816 summary dnp usum partially granted. chlorine, disharge. granted. radmattne desharged. conhng somer. [ HP-Mi 8.13 NRC 335 (1981)
CtM)IING Towl RN umtenien. radaucin-e dnt harges summary dnpnetum granted. no genume swue of matenal fact.
].T{,h;,
CRO%% LX4%I1%4110%
board. umurutimn permit. "disermble mierest" requirement. ALAB 631.13 NRC 87 (1981)
Q63 P p.,
,b o, i. l-2 4
7 r
.jj O w s
t]
37
~
w
SUBJECT INDEX l
e Di POSITION f,
dncoscry, NRC staff, special circumstances. ALAM34,13 NRC 96 (1981)
Dt IM)NITI()NS l
3 NRC stan, cornpelled, esceptuwial circumstances, direct perwmal knoela!ge, matenal facta, l
LDP.114,13 NRC 227 (1981)
DIRECTED CFRTIF1ATION 5
' ' 'w ':p I
constructum permit, enns esammation barred, standing to spreal, concrete injury to perweial U
an:erests, tuard a disunlmitum to mvc4e, discretumary authonty, denmi, ALAM31,13 NRC
~
87 (1981) r cumstructum permits, meerlocutory appeal, need for precine record reference, demed ALAM10,13 NRC 84 (1981) micrkrutory rulmg rejecting need for supplement to Final EIS on Class 9 accidenta, demed, l
ALAM35,13 NRC 309 (1981)
DISCOVERY NRC sian, desmitum, meerkwutory appeals, referral dcchned, AIAB-434,13 NRC 96 (1981) t depostum, 3 NRC staff, compellai, caceptmnal circumstances, direct perwnal knowledge, matenal l
facts, I HP-814,13 NRC 227 (1981)
DISQUALIllCATION 3
constructum permit, entire Ikensing hoard, fratum betmeen board and intervenon attorneys, demed, ALAll 640,13 NRC 84 (1981)
ENFORCEMENT NRC ruponsibehty, envinmmental radiaton protection standards, CLI-81-4,13 NRC 298 (1981)
EN)IRONN8c3TAL ASPECIS empirt twense, impact on ghibal commoin, mierventxisi petition, heanns denmi, CLI-8I 2,13 NRC 67 (1981)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS construction permit, PWR, evidenttery proceedmg, LBP-813,13 NRC 103 (1981)
FNVIRONMENTAI. IMPACT APPRAISAL not required. hmited operating heense; LDP-81-5,13 NRC 237 (1981)
E'.)1RONMENTAL IMPACT STATLMENT l
appellate revn, ruhng rejecting need for supplement Class 9 acendenta, ALAM35,13 NRC 309 (1981) high burmng nuclear fuel, suspensmn, hcense amendmenta DD-81-2,13 NRC 293 (1981) hcene amendrnent, spent fuel pel capansion, pre-NEPA bcensal facihty; ALAM36,13 NRC 312 i
I (1981) summary dispmatnin, coritention, manne bmirnana form, corisideratum of alternatives, A LAM 29,13 NRC 75 (19811 supplemental, Class 9 acchienta, 2.206 petitum demai DD'81-3.13 NRC 349 (1981)
FXPORT LICENSES petiton to meervene demed, heanns demed, nuclear nonprohferatum, environmental ampact on global comraons. CLI 81-2,13 NRC 61 (1981)
FlNANClAL QlJAI.lilCATONS TMI-l, espedite heanng achedulc, not to be htigated prmr to restart, CLI-81-3,13 NR'i 291 (1981)
FlNDINGS OF FACT constructum permit, esulentiary proteeding radhelogical health and safety mattecs, site suitatshty, envmmmeatal matters, LHP-81-3,13 NRC 103 (1981)
WEL transportation, umtentro, ammi:ig of pipulace for shipment accident, summary dispmatmn granted, L DP-81-2,13 NRC 36 (1981)
IIEAI.Til AND SAFTTY constructen permit, presmunted water reactor, evidentiary proceeding, LBP-81 J,13 NRC 103 (1981)
IIEARINGS I
safety heanngs, petitum to reopen 1206 petnam demed. DD 81-1,13 NRC 43 (1981)
INTERVENTION antarust revice, sale of part onnenhip, I BP 81-1,13 NRC 27 (1981) emport hcennes, nuclear non-pn>hferatum, environmental impact on global cornnuwis, petamm denied, CLI-81-2,13 NRC 67 (1981)
IJCENSE amenoment, sprnt fuel prmi espansum, facihty hcensed pnor to NEPA, ruhng requiring Els consideranon of contmued plant operstmn reversed. ALAB-636,13 NRC 312 ('981)
I
\\
4
.c
' ;WH, c' P i
I L
1
\\
p 1
i l
e SUBJECT INDDI L4 p
.'w
- eg.' y^#
7b',
suspension requests, amendment permittmg rerackmg and compact;on, spent fuel pools, demed,
- 4 DD-812,13 NRC 293 (1981)
UCENSES TMI 1, amendment, transfer, authonty to Imssess, deferred, CLI-88-3,13 NRC 291 (1981)
LIMr1ED WORK AUTHORIZATION ccustru: ton permit proceedmg, cost-benefit analys,s required, ALAB432,13 NRC 91 (1981)
MARINE BIOMASS FAkM summary dispouton, contenton, alternate energy source; A. LAM 29,13 NRC 75 (1981) l NUCLEAR NON-PROLIFERATION esport hcense, petition to intervene, heanns denied, CU-81-2,13 NPC 67 (1961) l NUCLFAR REGULATORY (X)MMISSION enforcement, environmental radiaton protectice standards, uraruum mills, CLI-814,13 NRC 296 (1981)
OPERATING UCENSE l
hmited, 50.57(c) motion, preheanng conference order; LBP 815,13 NRC 237 (1981) 3 proceeding, interlocutory appeal, summary dispositmn, contention, disnussed for want of urudiction, J
1 ALAB-633,13 NRC 94 (1981)
OPERATING UCENSI3 condition, modification c( control buddms; ALAB427,13 NRC 20 (1931)
POPULATION DENSTlY shutdown adjudicatory heanns intenm operation; CLI-811,13 NRC I (1981)
PREHEARING CONFERENCE order, 50.57(c) motion, interested state participation, environmental review reopemns proceahngs; LBP-81-5,13 NRC 237 (1981)
RADIATION PROTECTION STANDARDS uranium mdis, stay of implementation and enforcement demed CLI-814,13 NRC 298 (1981)
REACTORS pressunal water, constructen peruut, evidentiary proceeding; LBP-81-3,13 NRC 103 (1981)
RECORD reopen, stipularmn, niodification of control buddmg; ALAB427,13 NRC 20 (1981)
REGULATIONS vahdity, radiation protection standards, CLI-814,13 NRC 298 (1981)
RULIS OF PRACTICE 2.206 petitons, improper forum, facihty not hcensed, DD-81-3,13 NRC 349 (1981) admissibehty of contention, construction permit extenmon proceedmg; LBP-81-6,13 NRC 264 (1981) constructon pernut proceedmg. warrant for stay; ALAB432,13 NRC 91 (1981) constructen permit, standmg to appeal, concrete injury to personal anterests, discre*mnary directed certification authonty; ALAB431,13 NRC 87 (1981) discovery against NRC stafr, esceptonal circumstance; LBP-81-4,13 NRC 227 (1981) discovery agamst NRC staff, special circumstances, discretionary interlocutory revww, referral of ruhr.gs, ALAB434,13 NRC 06 (1981) discretionary mterlocutory reyww, policy disfavonng; ALAB435,13 NRC 309 (1981) hcense amendment, spent fuel pool capanson, improper supplemental argument; ALAB436,13 g
NRC 312 (1981) hated operstmg hcense, reopenmg of proccahngs, interested state participaten; LBP-81-5,13 NRC 217 (1981) olwrating hcense, mterlocutory apptal, required to await u,,tsal dectmon; ALAB433,13 NRC 94 (1981) show ause proceeding. burden of proof, LBP-81-7,13 NRC 268 (1981) simultaneous seeking of interlocutory r shngs and appellate revww, duquahficaton; ALAB430,13 NRC 64 (1981) stay of agency acton, uramum mill operators, radiation protection standards, CL1814,13 NRC i
298 (1981) summary dnposition motion, and response, contention, alternate energy source, afTidavits, statement matenal facts, ALAB-629,13 NRC 75 (1981) summary dispouten, contentions, statement of matenal facts, response r viewed in hght nmst favor-able to oppoung pany, no significant unresolved questiona, LBP-81-8,13 NRC 335 (1981)
SEISMIC CUNNIDERATIONS show cause proceeding. no ste dewatervig system; LBP 817,13 NRC 268 (1981)
LT,/
SilORT PIUNGS ISSUE admassbehty of contentmn, -
im;,u-pernut extenson prnr+ahag; LBP-81-6,13 NRC 264 (1981)
'll,h? &
J '
r :*s+
l
- 4, b
SUBJECT INDEX e
f MIO% CAUSE PROCEEDING partsal mitial decmoi permitting contmued reactor operation exhout ante desatenng system, LDP. 81.7,11 NRC 268 (1981)
^[
SITE SUITABILITY p' *y*.
i constniction permit. PWR, evalevitiary proceeding. LBP-813,13 NRC 103 (1981)
SPENT IEEL POOL i
, X' licenw amendment to expa.id, ruhng requinns EIS consuleration d contmued plant operation reverwd. ALAB-636,13 NRC 312 (1981)
SPENT FUEL POOIS directors deswon under 2.206. suspenmon hcense amendment to permit teracking and cornpaction, request denied, DD-81-2.13 NRC 293 (1981)
SPENT IEEIE transportatas, content.on, trammg of gwpub for shipment accident, summary dis,wton stacted.
LDP 81-2.13 NRC 36 (1981)
STAIT adjudicatory heanng, sasenm opriatior,, pyulation dena>*y, CLI-81-1, !) NRC 1 (1981)
STAY unpleswntaSon, enforcement, radiarkw. procation standa.A uranium mdi opersaws' petiten demed.
CLI-814,13 NRC 298 (1981) hcenung action stay, amendment of Part 2, ALAB-626,13 NRC 17 (1981) preheanns confereme, hmated operstmg hcenne, pending environmental review, motann demed, i
LDP-815.13 NRC 237 (1981)
SUMMARY
DISPOSITION contenton, alacrnate energy source, statement d matenal facts, ALAIM29.13 NRC 75 (l981) contention, traming populace for sgent fuel shipment accident, LBP-51-2.13 NRC 36 (1981) contentons, chlorme dacharges, radioacuve coolms tower ducharges. LBF-88-8,13 NRC 335 (1981) 113 TING TMI-l. hot functonal, non-nuclear authonzed. CLI-813,13 NRC 291 (1781)
TllRIE MILE ISLAND I
Unis I, restart denied. hcenw a:nendment, transfer, authonty to piswan, hot functkutal, tion-nuclear testmg authonzed, deferral. Emplementation dates. TMI-2 axident-related natters financial quahricatawis. CLI-813.13 NRC 291 (1981) impact, hmited operstmg beense, reopenmg of record, LBP-81-5,13 NRC 237 (1981)
TRANSCRtIT procedural mustance program, illegabtv of free transcnpt, interlocutory appeal, ALAI 425,13 NRC
!) (1981)
L'RANIUM nulls, radsstam protecton standards, stay of i nplementataan and enforternent demed. CLI-814,13 NRC 298 (1981) i E
^#
^ 1 a
E
i F
O
'y e M h5 5
J e
m w
NQ9
- r a,u t-2:yyt
! h%
y r
FACILrrY INDEX t
AL LENS CRFEK NUCLEAR GE NE R ATING STATION Unit No 1. Daket %466
' h CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. February 2. (1981). DECISION. ALAB-629.13 NRC 75 (198!)
b' -
CONSTRUCTION PERMIE. Fetwuary 3. (1981) Mt MOR ANDUM AND ORDER. ALAB-630.
11 NRC 84 (198h
[
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. February 4. (1981). MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ALAB-631.
.-*i 13 NRC 87 (1981)
SPECIAL PROCEf DING. March 10. (1981). MEMORANDUM AND ORDE R. ALAB-615.13 N*'
NRC 300 (1981)
B AILLY GENER ATING STATION. NUCLEAR t, Dmket S367 CPA. Construction Permit p5 Estenuon CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AMENDMENT. February 20. (198tt MEMORANDUM AND OR DER. LBP 84-6.13 NRC 264 (1981) ld '
BIG ROCK POINT NUCLEAR PLANT. Dmket Sl55 OLA. Spent Fuel Pool Espanuon
,"M OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT. March 31. (1981). DECISION. ALAB-636.13 NRC 312 j
(19811 b
CATA% B A NUCLEAR STATION. Units I and 2. Dmkets S413. S414. (10 CFR 2.206)
SPECIAL PROCEEDING. January 9. (1981). DIRECTOR'S DECIslON UNDER 10 CFR 2 206
.l DD-81 1.13 NRC 45 (1981)
- J CATA% BA NUCLEAR STATION. Units I and 2 - ANTITRUST: Dahet. W413A. S4l4 A ANTITRUST PROCEEDING. January 13. (1981). MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER. LDP-811.
J 13 NRC 27 (1911)
DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT. Units I & 2. Dakets 2275 0L. 2323-OL 12-OPERATING LICENSE. February 13. (1983). PREHEl. RING CONFERENCE ORDER.
]<
h,-
DI ABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POW ER PLANT. Umts I and 2. Dmkets W275. 50 323 M
SPECI AL PROCEEDING. March 26. (1981). DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 CFR 2 20e.
DD 81-3.13 NRC 349 (1981) s EXPORTS TO T Al% AN. Applicahon No. XR-136. Dmket il00N)$8. Appfwarion No X5N M 41719, 7[.
Dm ket l 1002175. Appination No X5NM41662. Docket 11001076.
SPECIAL PROCELDING. February 13. (1981L MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. CLI-al-2.13
^
NRC 67 (1981)
('
INDI AN POINT. Unni No 2. Dmkets %247. 50 286 SPECI AL PROCEE DING. January 8. (19st). MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER CLI-811.13 g
NRC I (1981)
INDI AN POINT. Unit No 3. Dmket E286
$PFCI AL PROCEEDING. January 8. (1981). MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER CLI-81 l.13 h
NRC l (1981)
J AMESPOR T NUCLEAR POWER ST ATION. Units I and 2. Dakets M516. %517 y
CONSTRUCTION PERMIT. January 15. (1981L MEMORANDUM AND ORDE R. ALAB-628 fj 13 NRC 24 (1981) p, A CROS5E BOILING W ATER REACTOR. SHOW CAU5E PROCEEDING. Dmket 4409-5C.
if -
Prov Op Lie DPR-45
$HOW CAUSE. February 24. (1981L PARTI AL INITIAL DECISION. LBP-817.13 NRC 268
(
(1981)
MIDLAND PLANT, Umis I and 2. Dmkets 50 329 OM & OL. 50 330 OM & OL l1%
ORDER OF MODIFICATION OF LICENSE. February 19. (1981L MEMOR ANDUM AND ll
,]
ORDER. ALAB M4.13 NRC 96 (1981)
Q, OPERATING LICENSE. February 12. (1981L MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDER. LBP 81-4.13
,m.,,
p-
' ?2 ?
NRC 227 (1981) g 6, ni M
1 l3, f 7..
W~
- 't 41 G-p V.
rh.
)
s l
I I
FACILITY INDEX i
e q
PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION, Unit 2, thwket W471 e,
s.
O)NSTRUCIION PERMIT, February S. (1981), MEMORANDUM, ALAIM32,13 NRC 91 6.-
(1981)
G [; (
0)NSTRUCTION PI RMIT, February 2. (1981), PARTIAL INITIAL DFCISION, LDP-813,13
'a NRC 103 (1981)
' jf #
SUSQUEll ANNA SIIAM LLECTRIC STATION, Units I and 2, thkets M387 01., E388 OL i
h i
OM RATING LICINSE, March 16, (1981), MLMCRANDUM AND ORDER, LBP 818,13 NRC l
135 (1981)
TilREE MILI: ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, Unit 1, thicket S289, Restart SPECIAL PROCI.LDING, March 23 (1981). ORDIR CLI 81-7,13 NRC 291 (1981)
SPECIAL PROCI EDING, March 26, (198'), MLMORANDUM AND ORDER, CLI-81-4,13 NRC 298 (1981)
TROJAN NUCIl'AR PLANT; thaket M144, (Cmtrol Husklin8)
SPICIAL PROCFEDING, January 6, (1981), MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR, ALAI 427,13 NRC 20 (1981)
I WILtlAM H MCGUIPE.*WCLEAR STATION, Un ts I and 2 thskets M369 OL, S3?O OL l
OPE R ATING LICI N%" finuary 6, (1941), MLMORANDUM AND ORDE R, ALAlt 626,13 NRC 17 (1981)
WILLIAM 11. ZIMMI R NUCLfAR STATION OPERATING LICENSE PROCEFDING, thsket E358 OL OPERATING LICENSE, Januaq 23, (1981); MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, LBP-81-2,13 j
NRC 36 (1981)
WILLIAM !! /IMMI R ST ATION, Dixket S358 OL OPI RATING t lCLNSL, f ebruary 9 (1981), MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, ALAIM33,13 NRC 94 (1981)
ZION STATION, Units I and 2 thukets S295, Mlos SPECIAL PROCIEDING, f ebruary 18. (1981), DIRECTORS DECislON UNDIR 10 CI'R 2.200 Dth81-2,13 NRC 293 (1981) t 1
i;r'
\\
e
' '{ Q 42
, K * ],'.
.c,.
. u a oovastnuant emosismo orrses iner 3si.mifiti
-. + =
E
te' a
P i
O
.r 1,
t!
\\
l i
t k-i l
fjy064215 L
2 AN42 9
ACM cCCuMEhr CCh TROL D PCR CL6 i
l
[
hasyggg,7gm l
t oc 2o5,5 i
I l
)
1 i
l 7..
X>m 'ev/,
,1.z : 'g :
-rgs;7 4:.,;. j' f'.
?'s:
W
=
h i
l I