ML20040A945
| ML20040A945 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Maine Yankee |
| Issue date: | 12/29/1981 |
| From: | Coltonmanheim DOWN EAST ALLIANCE, INTERVENOR |
| To: | NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201220337 | |
| Download: ML20040A945 (5) | |
Text
.
b i
o B3 FORD TH3 nTOUIC JAFETY AND LIC...sIUG BCaRD Tuesday 12/29/81 UNIT 3D STATE 3 NUCLEAR R3GULATORY COMMISSION, In the Vatter of
)
DOCKET No. 50-309
)
MAINS YANKE3 ATOMIC FO iER COEFaNY
)
(To Increase and Modify Spent FuelJoe (Maine Yankee Atomic Fower Station), )
Storage and Systems; p v
Applicant.
)
Compaction) 3
?\\
w>-
g Intervonor DO.W EAST _ALLIA JN bt the (IDEA)
\\,
PERSON OF DAVID COLT (N-EANHEIM C.
(n Decerber 4,1981 Intervenor Dom East Alliance finally receive 4 shat purports to be the Paine Yankee Spent Fuel Jtorage Modification
- Co:rplete Report - but which in Jupplerent 2 to the Proposed Change #70 includes a quarter inch centraction of the center to center spacinF of the storage locations.
1.
GRC Jtaff response in opposition to the Request For A Frehearing Jonference By Down 3ast Alliance was written 12/11/81, Specific Contention *was and is enclosed herewith.
2.
n J.
THIJ D033 NUr - (a) attack an applicable statutory requirement (b) challenge the basic structure of the Corr.ission's regulatory process, nor is it an attack on the regulations; (c) generalize regarding the Intervenor's views of what applicable policies should be, (d) raise an issue which is not proper for adjudication in the proceeding and does not apply to the facility in question (e) raise an issue which is not concrete or litigable.
K 3FF3' TI73 Vd. W3L RACK 3 FACING G0FJ OFF THE FAC3!
,y 4.
Fig. 3.1 C
90 MJ3L RnCK LOMINat CdiTSR TO CENTER S
hhhk9 K 3FF3CTIV3 VS. W3L RACK SPACING D
PDR Proposed Change No. 70 Supplerent No.1.
5 3.3.3 The K3iO result... SHOULD B3
[.012340j (NOT3 THAT THIS IS WITH0JT W3L7???????????)
3-3 10/5/81
\\
b3 FORD TH3 ATOMIC SAFSTY aND LICSidDiG BOARD USNRC p. 2 contirr:Ang on from p.
O.
6.
If among a & b equiprobable and rutually exclusive events, a are regarded s favorable and b unfavorable, then for a single trial p, probability of outcope a
favorable [ aa &b, q, probability of unfavorable outcore favorableoutcome[1-p[b/a&b.
(SIGMAd [ arithretical sum of the deviations The succesive teres in the binomial expansion (p&q)!
NOT GE0VETRICAL AS IN FORMERLY CONTalDED. )
n-r r
[ dIGMAr (n ) p (4) q (TIMES JIGN MAY BE IN-r p
DICATED BY 9 HERE-IN-AFTE, but n hn been Give the respective probabilities that in number of n used differently in a ti.als, the event will be favorable exactly n - r PARTICLE PHYSICS area) l timez (The mean number of favorable events is np, of unfavorable,_n.i; the standard deviation is n.
small sigma _ s.iuare root npg, alpha,etc.)
POOL HEAT LOAD 2.1.4 Table 2.1-1...... difference 6 days 217...
II.CGidISTaiT adoVUPTIGi aT THIS PODiT 217...
AliD FLEaJE I40rd THAT THIS IS TRUE IRREGARDLESS OF 6 DAY DIFFESiCE ilHICH JUST C0rPOUI;D3 THE IliVALIDITY OF
.eHaT FOLLOt.'S.
"2-l' 10/5/81 6 DAY DIFFER 3 ICE o 365.2h219///[u2191.4531 uu u6.
VD (nemory display) u 60.873698 small days 2191.4531 Y3ARS UD[ul826.211 74 FLdads NOTE THAT FIVE FACTORS aRE NOT COPraiSURAB LE with M _10 SCISITIFIC l
NOTATION.)
l 30L3 0F.. HAT FOLL0dd EnY h0T BE bOTH CulCR3TE A:iD LITIGABLE.
U :.'IhUa%500000005, is the estirrate of the amount.
I aVGG.iiT r.Y. A.:.3. RSTHIhE RSC sLCULaTE a:4D 5UbYIT U3 dig 216 OR (EITHER OR) or ask for extension of license n:4D NOTIFY III2DIATELY, Please, FETITIQlER D.E. A.
7.
FAJT JLU4 T33T Fa'3ILITY, HdiFORD,.vASHDiGTGi " recycles Fu why can't I.?
p.2
L.TR/&OR D0..M 3asT aLLInhG4 blFOR3 TH3 aTCLIC JAF3TY & LIC1 JING BOARD a b c d.e R.:,13GCRsCRnTiD" Herewith: aft /3, please, Robert L'. Lazo, 9:w., Chairran nde.inistrative Judge, ntocic safety & Licensing Board, U.S.N.R.C.
MiD Dr. Gadet li. Hand, Jr., adr.inistrative Judge & Director, Bodega l'arine lab.
r University of Galifornia, F.C. Box 247, Bodega bay, CA 94923 aND L' orris, adrinistrative Judge, Atoric Jafety & Licensing Board, eter n.
L.J.ii.R.G.,..ashington DC 20555 AMD Thocas Dialan, da., Ropes & Gray s
425 Franklin Jtreet, Boston, L'A 02110 AND Stanley Tupper, Tupper &
bradley, 1C2 Townsend Avenue, Boothbay Harbor, l'E 04538 AND Rufus S.
(copy to Ja es Tierney) please) *Lrennan, when ray I go on site?Thanks.)
brown, 33puty Attorney General. Department of the Attorney General, State Houue, nugusta, i'E Ch333 nUD David Jantee 1? iller, Council, Counsel for i etitioner JLP, 213 l'orran street, N. J.,..ashington, DC 20555 JD, atcric Jafety and Licenaing Board Fanel; al.omic Jafety and Licensing
..ppeal board; Docketing and Jervice dection, U.J.U.R.C., Washington,DC, A555 c.
ho'.. co the the first 217 fuel asserblies cet throuch the full cesk laycom area to the apent fuel cooling water and tack out to thecask lay-enm :. rec without passing physically throurh the second 217 asserblies of
. rent fval':
n.. a...R : They can't.
TYFO 2 line=s up was unintentional, but it, the cast; ' ca:.not accept what's ccming anc roing in three different of rections..here time is one of the dimensions.
YCU nRs FORJIhG !.'3 INTO-
~
lhe Unnein;
..u Li L' aster (with s _ IJbu 0-553-13578-3). Intervenor Down-aut. lliance re uests (c) "adjucication by a, 3
n.
A.
- a. & Ga* bridge ( G.
mv.cer-;.re..n, Hawkin c, a enrose, et al) Universit_v in the proceeding' as
.,t:.fr g fr.cto has roturned to the oririnal speculhtive-theoretical ferr of the t:;e..ritt"n contention.
Tf:Ia.X:li.al LY TC Tii' ? AGILITY IU U CTICI...
The followins two unnu~bered p:.res "aL.r. YW n.M CCR3 INVLTUlY 4:D aneT..
- RCsUvTo should be returned to IDIA in an i~ proved, updated forr, please.
p.3 j
+
4
! TM ;;C?. so '. AT al.Lla..L J3FC13 T!.3 4TC?'IC JaF.:'.TY & LICLJIG ECARD a b c d e I hr ve not been averring or arruing that closine of, a facility (?!.Y. A.P.S.)
1.
should te ccncidered.sa an alternative to expanding the capacity of a (the)
.si.ent fuel pol (as) have been particularly rejected.
(See Jtaff footnote 6/,
12/11/81.)
The idea is a little core complicated than that.
It is not, but it ray be cenaidered as si-ilar to increasing the burnup. The difference is that it richt solve the long terr waste disposal prcbler.
?'y estimate of the chance of thi.s is that it is unlixely, but considering how unfortunate the unfavorable outere is (critical event at r.Y.a.1.J., not to rention lone. tern unfortunate, unfavorsble problerj, ry re uest to be heard does not seer unrassenable, s
10.
a_ Specific Contention incorporates 100L H3AT LOAD 6. and the whole of L.
6.t tM pint te explain what was rer.nt by "inuevertant criticality. '
11.
Interv acr Lom.:;aat allit.nce, thou; h enly bringing forth one Jpecific wat ntion.wculd line to argue.
It would like to argue its Jpecific Contentien 3 car t..e aracific lin33 to ba called th= atrone argument and the nenk
-rur-nt.
T!.-
.rs ar,.u
.t ::nuld d-n3 vith 't!.3 v::",1+t> 3eport tith re s-j t-tatt?ra in fcr? th2 C' centr.ction la spuci:.g.
The Jtrc:q argue er.t wou'.d deel with th-t r: cfter the 2 t" centrr.ction in spacinc. Technically the ratters are re-1 r. t M. 1.;uln 114-to hear fror Com..;cl fer apj.licant on thia ttt-r.
He may e,.1;- tc, atition-r er Iat ervenor Lown.:;ast allicace.
1..cul d 314e to ra iueat cf The board a te porary relaxaticn in a b c d,
- r tha t < rd 'liticabl e '. Ti.is is because I.mu'd like to use the context & word 3 wi
,o ir. c' rticl-rh,'.,ics, un7re tha v.ord dradionucleides ' r.aa used in a f< r. t r.e
.r r 0 stien because I fir.:t nnt to use it in the cont xt r
a.El e u.n ful Icy-ent ".thr thm the d:a. ar of inady--tant criticality e ' t 2 st.
.or, r,fer.; tc a Jpecific Contentic.n, as typed.
Fror the cr$rinal 2,
C racced nad not u l a.m. audn,t 31, 1992 n t..iscac3ct, it should be -er--bered M
"fa ' a e ceain.' ', ".r t ac ci den t ', cr.1 'cabotaref.hre not to he excluded :fror the "9
4
' utur.
i p.E.
a.
.e
- 1
,1 e
s.iulJ Tii.:...TC' IC s,J3TY,a.D LICiJ1NG B0/JtD, David Colton-Vanheir, Box /386 abcde 13 Refer to 5.
liare the i.4.0 result as it should be'according to l'onte Jarlo, voce IV,.4.s referrad to us it shoula be as.0123409 which would be.012341 but -oving in the other directien, beyond 30,C00 hictories and toward atleas_t craater theoretical accuracy,.01.:3407 should be.01234567890123456789012345...
which doe.s not cLnge the result 0.9451956 31rnificantly but does introduce a better rethod, if you can follow what I am doing.
,.027.051 ator.s/b-ctr." IJ a l'R3 TTY LIYITED RMiG3 0F abcde 14.
3.3 4 JTUvY.
15, 3.4.3
" infinite" la objected to here. 0.0123456 (see 13. above is abcde
..uT I:'FDIT3). 1 lease let Pe rerind you of the difference between algebra; and arithmetic, physics, etc. on the other hand. and this presureably does i:.clude eng.ine 3 ring, under physics, doesn't it.
16.
O. January 4th,1982,1/4/82, Intervenor Down dast alliance received the letter of Robert F. Lazo dated Decerber 30th,1981 l'id?, posted, it is pre-suced at./? "l'3:01 (ar or ;r ) at 12: 55 am.
It is presumed that I.D.S.A. has
.mtil January 13,1982 (12:00pm) to complete this docu-ent in a ti-ely canner.
There is no electricity here at this tire making duplication at the health clinic difficult and this document is far fron conplete, but I.D.E. A. wculd s ickly as posaible and to be allowed to continue lir.e to have this served as u
en na withcut interruption.
Frevious letters to re-bers of the board, The
.wrinistr.itive Jucrem, are also re3uested to be served on the parties listed in 7...bove.
Two yellow p.es in the cricina) and one white original are included, but not given page nu-bers.
The two ask for rore information, the ene gives so e.
The handline of the white parer is left to the discretion of i
the board, as duplication would destroy significant rarts, of its information OC_ Y 0 4 4 O rc u Q e cn ten t.
David Colton-ranheim p.5 Boxd 386, Bedford's Earn l
Gouldsboro, l'aine 04607
_