ML20040A645
| ML20040A645 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 01/08/1982 |
| From: | Murley T NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO) |
| To: | Hanauer S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201210349 | |
| Download: ML20040A645 (2) | |
Text
.
y i
T st y
u y
y 81982 /[~
s '
JAN "j
. e m-Jfd 'M i
c3), a
,;/
u MEMORANDUM FOR: Stephen Hanauer, Director N
Division of Safety Technology VD.-
- ' d' NL L. -
FROM:
Thomas E. Murley, Director Regional Operations and Generic Requirements Staff
SUBJECT:
CRGR REVIEW 0F USI NUREGs This memo is to confirm the understandings from our meeting of December 30, 1981, regarding the timing of CRGR review of draft HUREG documents proposing a resolution of an Unresolved Safety Issue.
We agreed that you or your staff would brief the CRGR on draft USI NUREG documents prior to distributing them for public comment.
It is understood that the cost-benefit information will not be as comprehensive as it could be after receiving public coments. Nevertheless, it is better to have the CRGR review the proposed new requirements before sending them out for public comment. The Committee will probably want to review the proposed final NUREG after analyzing the comments and prior to seeking Commission approval.
The enclosed diagram shows the schematic process for reviewing USI NUREGs and other proposed new requirements as we discussed in our meeting.
Origueal signed by Thomas E. Ilurlo?
Thomas E. f'urley, Director Regional Operations and Generic Requirements Staff
Enclosure:
Diagram cc: CRGR Members
- 11. Denton C. Kniel Distribution i
TEMurley DEDR0GR cf ERK DEDROGR Staff
(
Central File l
PM ("oG/CP9) l omce> DE M S/D..
l l
8201210349 820100 T.....3 r..l.e.X :.b. 9...... " " PDR REVGP NRCCRGR l
sunn uc)
- t..
................. ~....
1 /. 4 /. 8 2......
............;..................l..................
om>
Nnc roau m no e03 Nncu om OFFIClAL RECORD COPY usam mi-aw.co.
December 30, 1981
~ ~ -
SCHEMATIC' REPRESENTATION OF NEW REQUIREMENTS REVIEW
)
USIs~
'.De'elop,
y Discussions With,
v Generic Issues Proposed Industry, ACRS, Operational Experience %
Requirement Public Reg. Guides
' Bulletins & Or'ders Propos~ed Rules V
Technical' Management Review'
- Cost / Benefit
~
- Prioritization y
I CRGR Review Revise Proposal A
or Public Comment or.
.Y No Furthbr Work Further Review ACRS, Commission y
d PMs Work With Licensees Input Licensees
[.
Integrate I f l
Into
~
Composite Schedule Agreed Upon Plant b----
Specific Imp]ementation Schedule
.'