ML20040A333
| ML20040A333 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1981 |
| From: | Houston M Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201200774 | |
| Download: ML20040A333 (8) | |
Text
.
DEC 311981 l.
Docket flos. 50-440 and 50-441 MEMCP.Af1DUM FOR:
A. Schwencer, Chief g
Licensing Branch fio. 2, DL i
FROM:
M. D. Ilouston, Project Manager L
l Licensing Branch flo, 2, DL i
l
SUBJECT:
FORTl!COMIfiG MEETIfiG WITH CLEVELAflD ELECTRIC ILLUMIflATIfiG j
COMPA!iY (PERRY, UflITS 1 AfiD 2)
DATE & TIME:
Jaruary 25-29, 1932 (Starting 1:00 Pft on 1/25/82) l LOCATI0il:
Perry fluclear Power Plant fiorth Perry, Ohio i
j PURPOSE:
fianagement Capability Review I
PARTICIPAflTS:
flRC i
i J. ft. Peschel (Region III), ?1. Gildner (Resident Inspector),
)
E. Pedersen (LQB) and D. Houston (DL) l j
CE I_
l L. Beck, B. Coleman i
j Original signed by i
M. D. !!ouston, Project Manager Licensing Branch flo. 2, d
Division of Licensing i
Attachrent:
l Agende TeP cs i
- l l
cc: See next page
)
i 1
gigOCKo774 811231 0500044o A
PDR OF FICE )
.DiloQston:ph ASchQenqd J...
y.
Q svimwi >
I.2/.M./81. 12/.3/..../8I our) mic reau na oc m wev ao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY m on-am u
Mr. Dalwyn R. Davidson Vice President, Engineering The Cleveland Electric illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland,e0hio 44101 cc:
Gerald Charnoff, Esq.
Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 M Street, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006 Donald H. Hauser, Esq.
The Cleveland Electric illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Resident Inspector's Office U.S.N.R.C.
Parmly at Center Road Perry, Ohio 44081 Donald T. Ezzone, Esq.
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 10S Main Street Lake County Administration Center Painesville, Ohio 44077 I
Tod J. F.enney f
228 South College, Apt. A
]
Bowling Green, Ohio 43402 Odniel o. wilt Wegriian, Hes11er & Vonderberg
}
7301 Chippewa Road, Suite 102 l
Brecksville, Ohio 44141 l
l Robert Alexander OCRE Interim Representativt 2030 Portsmouth Street Suite 2 Houston Texas 77098 I
Terry Lod'1e, Esq.
i l
915 Spitzer Building l
1eledo, Ohio 43604 l
l l
l
JANUARY 25-29, 1982 hANAGEMENTREVIEWOFCLEVELANDELECTRICILLUMINATINGCOMPANYFORTHE)
[ERRYNUCLEARPOWERPLANT)
Overall Objective:
Review the proposed organization for operation of the Perry Pi mt from the level cf the senior corporate officer who will be l
in overall charge of nuclear operations down to the proposed operating statf at the plant.
To accomplish this objective the review team will wish to spend time et the plant.
Corporate officers not normally resident on site will be requested to come to the site for presentations and/or interviews.
Our past practice has been to start the review with a thorough briefing by the utility on the proposed (or actual) organization, followed by in-depth discussions with selected individuals from the corporate office staff and from the plant staff, sufficient to gain a feeling for the qualifications and attitude of the individuals and an understandir g of how they actually fit into the oper3 tion.
Our pr me interest is to gain assurance that the coroorate management is involved with, informed about, and dedicated to the saf e operat ion c'f tne nuclear plant and that sufficient technical resources hav;; been or will be provided to adequately support sate plant operation.
The below listed specific matters to be covered ma, be presented in any order best suited to the applicant which will provide greatest overview of i
the plant optrations and accomodate personnel availability.
Sprcific Matters to be Covered:
1.
Overall corp 3 rate organization, snowing how the nuclear portion fits f
in to the rest of the utility's operations.
Relation of the senior t
corporate officer with nuclear responsibility to other corporate officials.
Responsibility and authority of senior corporate officer in charge of nu; tear operations.
2.
Corporate level support to be provided to plant operation?
If not under direct control of senior nuclear officer, how is support obtained? Number and qualifications of technical support personnel?
How organized? Relations between Corporate support elements and plant staff? Training of Corporate support personnel? Experience of support personnel with contemporary nuclear power plants, i
3.
We will need to gain an understanding of how the proposed organiza-tion for operation compares with the organization that is and has I
been in effect during the plant construction, with emphasis on I
hanges tha*, have been or will be made to strengthen the orgar.iza-tion, and the provisions for mairtaining and transferring the plant knowledge gained in the design ano construction phase to the operating organization (corporate and plant staff).
4.
The involvement of the Corporate and plant staff in the preoperational testing and startup testing programs.
I
(
)
1
I I
for the plant staff, we need to determine the operating organization 5,
and how it interacts to assure s.fe plant operation. Nember and qualifications of technical support personnel and maintenance personnel?
j l
What provisions will be made for security and the fire brigade?
i l
l Proposed shift staffing? Numbers and qualifications per shift?
i t
1
)
How many shi'ts? Experience of plant personnel in the operation I
and maintenance of contemporary nuclear power plants.
Training
{
I l
provisions for both licensed and unlicensed personnel? How many j
I now in training?
Future intentions?
l 6.
Proposed QA organization fur operation? Relation to plant staff?
Explain how QS function is independent from power production.
l 7.
Intent regarding safety review of plant operations? On-site review? Corporate review and audit? Provisions for Independent f
I Safety Engineering Group?
f i
8.
Plans and procedures, if available, for meet ing the following Task Action Plant Items:
a.
1.A.1.1 - Shift Technical Advisors Provisions to be made for Shift Technical Advisors.
How l
I obtaineu? Qualifications? Reporting channels?
Relations to shift staff?
b.
1.A.1.2 - Shift Supervisor Administrative Duties Pruvisions for relieving the Shift Supervisor of administra-tive duties that detract from the management responsibility I
for assuring the safe operation of the plant.
c.
1.A.1.3 - Shift Manning Numbers of operators in training programs at present and for l
the near future.
Procedure to limit maximum working hours.
1 l
d.
1.A.2.1 - Training and Qualifications of Operating Personnel l
Provision to be made for the immedaate upgrading of Operator
)
and Senior Operator training and qualifications.
i
)
e.
1.B.1.2 - Independent Safety Engineering Group i
i j
Provisions for the Independent Safety Engineering Group.
i J
f.
1.C.2
- Shift Relief and Turnover Procedures Discuss Shift Relief and Turnover Procedures to ensure that each oncoming shift is aware of critical plant status informa-i tion and system availability prior to assuming duty.
9 1.C.3 - Shift Suoervisor Resporuibilities Responsibilities and authority of shift supervisor. Plans for procedures delineating functions and authority.
h.
1.C.4 - Control Room Access i
l l
Procedure for limiting access to the control room.
1 l
i.
1.C.5 - Procedures for Feedback of Operating Experience to 1
i the Plant Staff Plans and procedures f or evaluat ion and f eedtd of operating l
experience.
How is information obtained? Who or which group performs evaluation? How is information disseminated? To whom? Checks to assure it has reached appropriate parties at plant and corporate levels?
j.
NUREG - 0654 - Emergency Planning (organization aspects) r l
.I l
Preparation and guidelines for Radiological Erergency Response l
Plan.
k.
10 CFR 50.48 - Fire Protection Plan (Training Aspects)
Plans for the Fire Protection Training Program.
DATE:
12/31/81 MEETING NOTICE DISTRIBUTION:
i Docket File (s)
NRC, Region I f
Branch Reading File NRC, Region II NRC PDR NRC, Region III Local PDR NRC, Region IV NSIC NRC, Region V TERA NRC
Participants:
E.G.
Case D.G. Eisenhut/R. Purple T. Novak y
S. Varga p
T. Ippoli to l
R.A. Clark RECEIVED g
)
J.F. Stol z 4
)
R. Tedesco
' Cl J AN 6 1982> :! I B.J. Youngblood umnuuaw suendl
/
A. Schwencer scE86 8 F. Miraglia 2
ux E. Adensam 7
4 J.R. Mill er s,
G G.C. Lainas D.
tc field bcc: Applicant Service List T. Wambach Branch:
Licensing Branch No. 2 R.H. Vollmer MDHouston Project Manage;:
g l
V. Moore Licensing Assistant:
7, 9 ;cy night W.V. Johns ton D.R. Muller P.5. Cl.ett 1..E.
!reger i.
mn, to i !
.u F. Schroeder M i. Erns!
Attorney, DELD J. LeDoux, IM ll. Grime,, ISE ACR5 (16)
Ol&E (3)
DSD (7) l