ML20040A299

Opposes Scheduled 811221 Public Ex Parte Briefings on Unit 1 Restart & Public Discussion on Info Flow During Unit 2 Accident.Any Evidence Should Be Presented in Context of Full & Fair Public Hearing

ML20040A299
Person / Time
Site:	Crane
Issue date:	12/17/1981
From:	Bradford L THREE MILE ISLAND ALERT
To:	Bradford P, Gilinsky V, Palladino N NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20040A295	List: ML20040A294 ML20040A299
References
REF-10CFR9.7 NUDOCS 8201200728
Download: ML20040A299 (2)

Text

.

,I Louise Bradford, Chairperson Three Mile Island Alert, Inc.

315 Peffer St.

Harrisburg, PA 17102 December 17, 1981 Commissioner Palladino, Chairman Commissioner Bradford Commissioner Gilinsky Conmissioner Ahearne Commissioner Roberts U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Commissioners:

Re: Scheduled December 21, 1081 Public and Closed Staff Briefings on TMI-l Restart, and Public Discussion on Information Flow i

During the TMI-2 Accident i

As a carty to the TMI-1 restart proceedings, ( Metronolitan Edison Comnanv, Three Mile Island Mucl. ear Station Unit 1, Docket

40. 50-289),

and as renresentative of a large segment of the nooulation surroundinr, TMI, TMIA strenuousiv obj ects to the above-referenced Staff briefings and demand that they be immediately cancelled.

He are anoalled that the Commission finds it acceptable to s licit ex carte comments of this nature from one carty to o

the restart proceedings, without fully advising the other oarties what contentions and pronosals will be discussed, and without affording all parties a full conortunity to cross-examine these witnesses on the record of the croceedings to establish the propriety and correctness of their conclusions.

Procedural due process reauires at a minimum reasonable notice and a reasonable ooportunity to be heard.

A general discussion and, presentation of views by one narty certainly does not constitute due nrocess as contemolated bv the Atonic Energy Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, or the Constitution.

Further, such a procedure violates on its face the NRC rules nrohibiting ex parte communication, 10 CFR 2.780, as well as the principle that any evidence presented in a case before an administrative agency he received only during a nublic hearing., on the record.

Seacoast Anti-Pollution League v.

Costle, 572 F.2d 072, cert. den. 9C S.Ct. 9? (1978).

We note that on August 20, 1031, the Commission broke its promi~se to the intervenors and to the neonle in this area to imnediately review the merits of the ASLB restart decision.

This rule change greatly exacerbated the distrust with which TMIA and area residents had alreadv come to view the Commission's decisional process on restart.

However, we accented the Commission's decision and are oursuing the time consuming adninistrative anneal route.

Eventually, the record of the case will reach the Commissioners for review, but this clear 1v vill take quite some time.

For the Commissioners now to reauest to be " briefed" by one party en the 8901200728 811217 PR 10CFR P ' 9. 7

. DR

~

s

, s'

-q.

merits of certain tf not all asoects of the case, such narty's credibility itsel being an issue in the case, not only before the Anneal Board has reached its decision, but while the ASLB still has jurisdiction over the case, is extremely crejudicial to the other oarties, frustrates the apneal nrocedure which we are forced to nursue, and continues to place the integrity of this process in doubt.

In fact, the ASLB still has before it notions to reopen the record, as well as issues on exam cheating and the integrity of the examination nrocess to decide.

Obviously, anv ex parte statements to the Commissioners hv the Staff on any of these matters would be grossiv violative of the narties' due nrocess rights.

In addition, the scheduled briefing on information flow concerns a subj ect which was litigated before the ASLB, including the issue of Mr. Stello's own view of the conclusions drawn in UUREG-0760.

No narty to the restart proceeding.s has ever been granted the oncortunity to question Mr.Stello on this matter.

Clearly, our rights to a full and fair administrative apneal will be severely preiudiced, unless we are given a full onnortunity to cross-examine Mr. Stello on the testimony he gives the Commissioners.

As if it were not bad enough that the Commission has scheduled public ex parte briefings, it has also scheduled a third briefing, closed not only to the public at large, but to the parties as well.

This is an egregious violation of our rights as a narty to the proceedings and can only serve to anger and frustrate the area residents.

MRC nolicy clearly suonorts public hearings, and we strenuously obj ect to such secret meetings.

Thus, we demand that these neetings be cancelled, and that if the Commission is to receive any evidence in the TMI-l restart proceedinos, it do so only in the context of a full and fair nublic hearing with reasonable notice to all the narties.

Anything less must not be nermitted.

Sincerely, 1

[eru.m O vv [to Louise Bradford, TMIA

,..,9 1

~

COMMISSI0il BRIEFING ON TMI-1 STATUS DECEMBER 21,1981 t-

.r s m

,e

~

/.

= :::t ;39 (

I:.

JAjj 519971.

?

Ce :~.

v,

., gg

. l R. JACOBS DL/.'IRR I

12/21/81 gg u ---

4M0:I:(

..n.

-r

-. _ ~ - - - - -. > - ~

.n..

a-'

- ~ ~

-a-----~~~~

t 1

2 J

OUTONE e

RESTART SEQUENCE e

STAFF CERTIFICATION APPROACH c

J e

OPERATOR IRAlf4ING e

flAJOR RESTART Il0DIFICATIONS e

flVREG-0737 IMPLEMENTATION STATUS e

P2 ACTOR WATER LEVEL INSTRUMENTATION e

STEAM GENERATOR PROBLEMS / SCHEDULE e

GOVERt10R IHORNBURGH POSITION e

PLANT STATUS / SCHEDULE l

i 4

i l

I I

?

l b

l k

_a

?

7'""

.....m.

4

1. 0 07'0)

'IV 7V,8

~

(U349 3g 3ro e, JS3,,20 ] 7V a

6 5

Set 1

IS3] SJ yO ;y,gpo m

a lk i

U w

i Sgm U e

y n

'd kog,gd 407

^

E z

s 7

x wE

%V

~

w dl 5

o M

o Ih /l1S3, f

N09) "%e l

lVoty C

4

=

l r

-m--n

m.

4 PLAN FOR CERTIFYIflG COMPLETION OF TMI-1 RESTART REQUIREMEflTS 4

REQUIREMEllTS SOURCES LICENSEE RESTART REPOP.T COMMISSION'S ORDERS oN Till-1 RESTART MRC STAFF SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS DEVELOPS

=

j 30ARD DECISIONS INSPECTION GPU LETTERS MATRIX i

BOARD ORDERS IESTIMONY 18E BULLETINS l

INSPECTION DEFICIENCIES UTILITY MASTER LIST 4

ir NRR CERTIFICATION ON RESTART REQUIRES REGIONAL LETTER REGARDING COMPLETION OF REQUI REMENTS t

4 r

i

}

t I

~

5 OPERATOR STAFFING REQUIREMENTS NEW OLS e 2 Se410R REACTOR OPERATORS (SROS) e 2 REACTOR OPERATORS (ROS)

PRESENT OPERATING REACTORS

~

s 1 SRO

~

e 2 ROS STAFF POSITION IN HEARING ON TMI-1 RESTART e

2 SROS - 1 LICENSED

^

l IRAINED, LICENSED Ac R0 e 2 ROS IIANAGEMENT PID STAFFING REQUIREMENTS AT RESTART e 1 SHIFT SUPERVISOR SRO LICENSED e 1 SHIFT FOREMAN SR0 TRAINED, R0 LICENSED e 2 CONTROL ROOM OPERATORS R0 LICENSED e ATTEMPT TO MAINTAIN SIX SHIFT ROTATION WITH NORMAL WATCHSTANDING PERSONNEL e HIERARCHY OF ACTIQlS IF UNABLE TO MAINTAIN 6, 5, OR 4 SHIFTS I

9 9

S

6 TMI-1 RESTART CXAMIB!ATIONS_

OCTOBER 1981 RESULTS BY POSITI0'l MELD APPLICANTS PASSED FAILED WITHDRAWN REACTCR OPERATORS (ROS) 14

'9 4

1 SENIOR REACTOR OPERATORS (SROS) 20 10 10' PoSITIONHELq SHIFT SUPERVISOR' (6)

(3)

(3)*

SHIFT FOREMAN (4)

,(1)

(3)*

' OPS STAFF, IRG, SISS (10)

(6)

(4)

• 1 SHIFT SUPERVISCR #iD 1 SHIFT FOREMAN PASSED R0 EXNi S

o i

e

i TMI-l SHIFT STAFFING PRIOR TO RESTART TECilNICAL SPECI FICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE:

e r,

COLD SHUTDOWN - 1 SHIFT SUPERVISOR ON SITE, SR0 LICENSED 1 CONTROL ROOM OPERATOR, P0 LICENSED IN CONTROL ROOM ll0T SHUTDOWN

- SAME AS COLD SHUTDOWN + 1 ADDITIONAL CONTROL ROOM GPERATOR, R0 LICENSED LICENSEE HAS 9 R0 AND 4 SR0 SHIFT PERSONNEL 110LDING LICENSES WHO PASSED ALL PARTS OF e

OCTOBER 1981 EXAM I

l 4

llCENSEE HAS JUSTIFIED AND Tile STAFF HAS ACCEPTED USE OF 5 ADDITIONAL LICENSED OPERATORS WHO FAILED A PART OF THE OCTOBER EXAM IHESE INDIVIDUALS WILL BE USED FOR COLD SHUTDOWN OPEFATIONS UNTIL RELICENSED.

9 LICENSEE PLANS TO CONTINUE THE SIX SHIFT ROTATION SCHEt1E PRESENTLY USED T

l s

m

~

8

~

MAJOR RESTART N0DIFICATIONS I.

flRC REQUIRED MODIFICATIONS e

AUGUST 9 ORDER /NUREG-0737 (34 SPECIFIC ITEMS)

EMAINING GPUSCHEDULED FFORT LOMP LETION

- CONTAINMENT ISOLATION DIVERSITY TESTING 1/82

- ANTICIPATORY REACTOR TRIP IESTING 1/82

- PORV/SV VALVE POSITION INDICATION PLANT

-12/81 ACCEPTANCE

- THI-l AND 2 SEPARATION 2 WKS. OF 2/82 CONSTRUCTION

- PRESSURIZER HEATERS EMERGENCY IESTING 1/82 POWER

- PORV/RX TRIP SETPOINTS TESTING 1/82 1

- NOBLE GAS MONITORS INSTALL &

2/82 TEST

- ARI AUTOMAT!C INITI ATION TESTING 1/82

- INADEQUATE CORE COOLING IESTING 1/22 OTHER llRC REQUIREMENTS (10 SPECIFIC ITEMS)

- MASONRY BLOCK WALLS IEB 80-11 IN CONSTRUC-2/82

!N/3S"

- PIPE SUPPORTS IEB 79-02/79-14 483/573 2/82 COMPLETE

- CATWALK SEISMIC CAPACITY IN CONSTRUC-2/82

" ION UNTIL

./82

- INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM IE3 79-27 TESTING 2/82 i

- SECURITY IN CONSTRUC-2/82

)

" g UNTIL

9 MAJOR RESTART MODIFICATIWS 1

II.

LICENSEE INITIATED MODIFICATIONS (36 SPECIFIC ITEMS)

GPU SCHEDULED

~

LOMPLETION INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEf1 l

CONTROL ROOM DESIGN DECAY MEAT PUMPS ALL COMPUTER REACTOR COOLANT PUMP CIRCUITRY

~

CONTAINMENT COOLING IE DuS LOADING H2 RECOMsINERS I

il l'

,i

. J_

~

10

~

.1UREG-0737 ITEMS DUE 1/1/80 - 5/30/80 (L

CATEGORY A)

TMI-l STATUS I. A.1.1.1 STA ON DUTY COMPLETE I.A.1.2 SHIFT SUPER DUTIES I.C.l.1 SB LOCA PROCEDURES l.C.2 SHIFT / RELIEF T/0 PROCEDURES-I.C.3 SHIFT SUPER RESPONSIBILITIES 1.C 4 CONTROL ROOM ACCESS II.B.2.1 SHIELDING REVIEW II.3.3.1 ACCIDENT S AMPLING II.D 1.1 RV/SV TEST PROGRAM 1 P II.D.3.1 VALVE POS INDIC SER ISSUED, MOD.NEAR COMPLETION ll.E.1.2.1A AFW INIT - CONT GRADE SER ISSUED, MOD NEAR COMPLETION II.E.1.2.2A AFW FLOW - CONT GRADE COMPLETE II.E.3.1 EMER PWR FOR HEATERS SER ISSUED, MOD NEAR COMPLETION II.E.4.1.1 DED H2 PENET DESIGN COMPLETE II.E.4.2.1-4 DIVERSE ISO SIGNALS SER ISSUED, MOD NEAR COPLETIGl ll.F.2.1 SUB COOL METER SER ISSUED, MOD NFAR OY@LETICW, II.G 1 UPGRADE POWER TO PORV & LVL INSTR. COMPLETE III.A.l.1 EMERG PLAN - SHOR T TERM III. A.1.2.1 INTERIM FACILITIES 111.D.1.1 PRIM COOLANT LEAKAGE

' I lll.D.3.3.1 I DETECTION - SHORT TERM i

o Y

~

11 NUREG-0737 ITEMS SCHEDULED THROUGH 6/30/81, EXCLUDING STLL ITE1S ITEM IITLE TMI-1 STATUS l.A.l.l.3 STA TRAINED TO CAT B COMPLETE I.A.1.1.4 STA LONG TERM PROGRAM I.A.1.3 SHIFT MANNING (OVERTIME LIMITS)

I.A.2.1.1 SRO EXPERIENCE I.A.2.1.2 SRO BE R0 1 YEAR l. A.2.1. 3 THREE MO TRNG ON SHIFT I.A.2.1.4 MODIFY TNG PROGRAM I.A.2.3 INSTR COMPL SRO TNG I.A.3.1.1 SCOPE OF LIC EXAMS I.A.3.1.2 PASSING GRADE I.C.1.2.A ICC GUIDELINES 9 I I.C.1.3.A ACC & TRANSIENT GUIDELINES GUIDELINES UNDER REVIEW I.C 5 FEEDBACK OPER. EXP.

COMPLETE I.C 6 PERFORMANCE OF OP. ACT, II.E.4.2 CONT. ISOLATION PRESSURE SETPOINT II.E.:4.2.6 CONT. PURGE VALVES II.K.1 IE BULLETINS II.K 2.3 FMEA ON ICS II.K.2.11 OPER TNG. 8 DRILLING II.K.2.14 LIFT FREQ. PORV/SV II.K.2.15 SLUG FLOW II.K.2.15 RCP SEAL DAMAGE II.K.2.20 SYS RESPONSE TO SB LOCA 1 P II.K.3.2 PORV FAILURES GENERIC 38W REPT. UNDER REVIEW II.K.3.3 PORV/SV CHALLENGES COMPLETE II.K 3 7 PORV OPEN PROB.

GENERIC'38W REPT. UNDER REVIEW II.K.3.10 ANTICP TRIP COMPLETE l

II.K.3.17 ECCS OUTAGES II.K.3.30 SB LOCA SCHEDULE

~

III.A.1.2.2 EMER. FACILITIES DESIGN III.A.2.1 EMER. PREP.

III.D.3.3 RADIOIODINE MON.

gr Ill.D.3.4 CONT. RM. HABIT. REVIEW LICENSEE SUBMITTAL UNDER REVIEW l

~

12 NUREG-0737 ITEMS SCHEDULED 7/1/81 - 12/31/81 TMI-1 STATUS

'I.A.3.1 SIMULATOR EXAMS COMPLETE II.B.l.2.1 FINAL DESIGN OF RCS VENTS LICENSEE SUBMITTAL UNDER REVIEW Il.B.4 TRNG. FOR MllIGATING CORE DAMAGE COMPLETE II.E.1.1 SHORT TERM AUX FW SYSTEM EVAL.

COMPLETE ll.E.1.2.1.B AFW SAFETY GRADE INITIATION NUREG-0680 SUPP. 3 (SHUTDOWN REQ'D)

PERMITTED DEFERRAL TO 1ST REFUELING AFTER RESTART II.E.1.2.2.C AFW SAFETY GRADE FLOW INDICATION SER ISSUED, MOD NEAR COMPLETION ll.E.4.1.2 INSTALL DEDICATED H2 PENETRATION COMPLETE II.E.4.2.5.3 MODIFY CONT. PRESSURE SETPT.

COMPLETE Il.E.4.2.7 RADI ATION SIGNAL ON PURGE VALVES COMPLETE I I. K.2.10 SAFETY GRADE TRIP COMPLETE Il.K 3.1.1.A PORV ISO DESIGN (IF REQUIRED)

NOT YET REQUIRED ll K.3.5.A AUTO TRIP OF RCP'S NOT YET REQUIRED (IF REQUIRED) l

'3 fluREG-0737 ITEMS SCHEDULED FOR l'J82 NUREG-0737 Till-1 SCHEDULE COMMITMENT I.A.l.3.2 f1IN SHIFT CREW 7/1/82 7/1/82 I.C.l.2B ICC PROCEDURES 1ST REFUEL 1ST REFUEL r

AFTER 1/1/82 AFTER RESTART I.C.l.3B TRANS S ACC PROCEDURES 1ST REFUEL 1ST REFUEL AFTER 1/1/82 AFTER RESTART 11.3.1 RCS VENTS INSTALLED

• 7/1/82 7/1/82 (1)

II.B.2.2 SHIELDING MODS

• 1/1/82 (1) 11.3.2.3 E0ule QUAL

• 6/30/82 6/30/h2 )

11 11.3.3.2 UPGRADE ACC SAMPLING

• 1/1/82 (2) IST REFUEL AFTER RESTART II.D l.2A RV a SV TESTING 4/1/82 EPRI PROGRAM

~

II.D.I.2n PLANT SPECIFIC REPORT 7/1/82 EPRI PROGRAM II.D.I.3 3'.: VALVE TESTING 7/1/82 EPRI PROGRAM II.E.1.1.2 ARI EVAL - LONG TERM Il0DS*

1/1/82 IST REFUELING AFTER RESTART II.F.1.1 ll0BLE GAS IIONITOR*

1/1/82 5% POWER ll.F.1.2 IODINE /PART Il0NITOR*

1/1/82 5% POWER II.F.1.3 CONT RAD MONITOR

• 1/1/82 5% POWER II.F.1.4 CONT PRESS Il0NITOR*

1/1/82 (2) IST REFUELING AFTER RESTART II.F.1.5 CONT H O LEVEL

• 1/1/82 (2) IST REFUELING 2

AFTER RESTART II.F.1.5 CONT MYDR0 GEN

• 1/1/82 (2) IST REFUELING AFTER RESTART II.F.2.5 ICC INST

• 1/1/82 IST REFUELING AFTER RESTART l l. K. 3. lB PORV ISOL INSTALLED 1ST REFUEL Il0T YET REQUIRED (IF REQUIRED) 8 MOS. AFTER STAFF APP. LESIGN ll.K.3.5B RCP AUTO TRIP MOD (IF IOD Il0T YET REQUIRED REQUIRED)

II.K.3.30B SB LOCA MODEL 1/1/82 10 MC's. AFTER STAFF ACCEPTANCE 7lAY REQUIRE PLANT SHUTDOWN (1) PARTI AL BY RESTART, ADDT'L RELIEF REQUEST EXPECTED (2) FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY EXISTSJ WILL NOT MEET ALL.1UREG-9737 CRITERI A

THREE fille ISLAtlD UtlIT 1 14 ICC HOT LEG LEV!L I::STRUP.C:T SYSTE:4 YENT Outside Inside b

Contaictnent Contsinment g

+

j C0!1IROL 1E CABINETS

}

R005 TT

-r TE

~

/

1

,r w

1 10_, s

,,0 4

LT lo-LY 4

=

l 77 TE U

HIC 3 L E Vit.

l EXISTING PRESS-OTSG TAP

=

t y

SGia

/I 1

i Y

I REACICR j

YESSEL LOW T!

LEVEL Q

Typical for Two Loops One Loop Shown

15

~

STENi GBEPATOR-CHROWLOGY/SCHEDUE A.

LICENSEE'S ACTIONS AND SCHEDULED PLANS TO DATE 21 (10V 81 - PRIMARY TO SECONDARY LEAK DETERMINED IN THE 'B' OTSG 4 DEC 81

- INITIAL N2 BUBBLE TEST DETERMINED 30 LEAKING TUBES IN 'B' OTSG AND 83 LEAKING TUBES IN 'A" 0TSG

- ESTABLISHMENT OF OTSG TUBE LEAK TASK FORCE 5 DEC 81

- EDDY CURRENT TESTING ON 'B' OTSG 3-11 DEC 81 - SECOND N BUBBLE ON ' A' AND '3' OTSG, 6 ADDT'L 2

LEAKING TU3ES IN 'S' OTSG 12 DEC 81 - EDDY CURRENT TESTING OF 800 TUTES IN EACH OTSG STARTED 19 DEC 01 - FIRST TUBE REMOVAL SCHEDULED B.

ITEMS IN PROGRESS DETERMINING FINAL EDDY CURRENT PROGRAM COLLECTING OTSG OPERATING HISTORY IUBE REMOVAL CANDIDATES WILL BE FIBEROPTIC / VIDEO INSPECTED AND METALLURGICALLY TESTED MODE OF FAILURE WILL BE IDENTIFIED REPAIRS WILL BE MADE AS NECESSARY AT LEAST 2 MONTHS NEEDED TO CORRECT PROBLEM *

• UNTIL FAILURE MODE DETERMINED AND EXTENT OF DEGRADATION OF OTHER TUBES IS KNOWN, A GOOD ESTIMATE OF COMPLETION CANNOT BE MADE l

1 Y,

. =,,

ONCE-THROUGH STEAM GENERATOR i

I g Primary inlet nozzle.

8

.J Generating N.

tubes y/

i

~~ /

Upper tube y

N W^

sheet

.i.

-i r1 4

I b Auxiliary fj 67 feedwate-7 s

i 1

p 5

heade>

i h

t I

Upper shelig-3 m

6 y!

Tube I

1 r

support j

e Cylindrical plates y

baffle a

N y

k=\\!!

i n

Ng~h outlet (Steam N

nozzles

17 TYPICALFLAWLOCATIONS Ill UPPER TUEESHEEf REGION UPPER TUBE SH

,A L

A

/

1 A

l l

I

/

1h"TY POLL _2XPANSION i

\\

REGION l

\\

/

t.

+

4

}

L_

- TYPICAL FLAW LOCATIONS 24"

/

i

__ _ t _.._L_ _

p~!

[

/

l l

1 l

l l

/

O.625 0.o. x 0.034 THK INCCt4EL TUBING d.008" GAP

~

18 I

I IN GOVERNOR IHORNBURG'S LETTER TO THE C0fHISSION CHAIRMAN DATED NOVEMBER 20,1981, GOVERNOR STATED INTENT TO SUPPORT RESTART OF TMI-1 IF TWO CONDITIONS ARE MET:

"(1) DEVELOPMENT OF A CONSENSUS FOR A REALISTIC PLAN FOR UNIT 2 DEcmTAMINATION (2) RECEIPT OF ADEQUATE ASSURANCE THAT UNIT 1 CAN BE OPERATED SAFELY" 4

e

=

i

.~.

19 PLANT STATUS /SOEDUE e LICENSEE PROJECTED DATES _

- FINAL HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTIfE 1/15/82

-CRITICALITY 2/1/82 e STAFF PRELIMIfMRY ESTIFMTES

- FINAL HOT FUNCTIONAL TESTIflG FEBRUARY 1982

-CRITICALITY PARGi 1982

- STFM GBIERATOR PROB Wi NOT FACTORED IffTOT.STIFMTE

- OVERALL LISTItE OF ALL ITEMS PEQUIRED FOR PESTART STILL UNDERREVIEW

.y

- mm_wn,m ra rmmrmmmn y a u i n ya n'nTOTVMVWiUC\\.'WWWWMWg\\yl#ggy(qQ.Q Z

.r f

12/81

%e f

P TRANSMITTAL TO:

M~/

Document Cont ol Desk,

• =>

016 Phillips

.g ADVANCED COPY TO:

O

'The Public Document Soom c

4:

DATE:

/

i

[]

cc: OPS File 9

From: SECY OPS Branch

/

/

C&R (Natali.e-)

.6 p

. Attached-areIcocies of a Commission meeting P

transcript /s/ and'related meeting document /~/.

They h

s are being forwarded for entry on the Daily Accession

iE:>

List and clacement in the Public Document Room.

No

'P other distribution is requested or required.

Existing DCS identification numbers are listed on the individual

~

~

~

b H

documents wherever known.

b Meeting

Title:

/

MN T, P i l i

,1 y

Open MEITING DATE:

Closed DOS COPIES:

Copies (1 of each Checked)

ITEM DESCRIPTION:

Advanced May To PDR:

Original be Duolicate g'

1.

M r-~ M Document Dup

• Copy

• 2 l

l

.s,o,i i

l.. @wAA

/

/

INx 2.

x

\\:v 7iL MM E -L, /)./INf /

7

[.

4

,: =.

1 i!, MN

/

p.93x 3,

E

\\[

.. ~ '

o e

3.

,~d

',* p%/

f U

o y

W

\\:

.v 3

p&

lid

'e-d 4.

g 5.

q

^

~

"Er=

g g

S cYd 52

• Verify if in DCS, and h

ch'ange to "PDR g

(PDR is advanced one of each docunent, t.ro available."

d of each SECY paper.)

g MiW@wwwm mem emmen===2

~

.-=