ML20040A222

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Required Fee for 811203 Tech Spec Amend Request to Redefine RHR Containment Cooling,In Response to
ML20040A222
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  
Issue date: 01/07/1982
From: Rausch T
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: Miller W
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
NUDOCS 8201200561
Download: ML20040A222 (3)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _

4 Comm:nwrith Edison one First Nitional Plaza. Chicago. Ilknots

~

Address Reply to: Post Office Box 767 Chicago, tilinois 60690 Janua ry 7, 1982 I

Mr. William O. Miller License Fee Management Branch Office o f Administration W IcNM, U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission e

Washington, D.C.

20555

\\

9

\\

)

~

7.f.' l/13, 7,a

Subject:

Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 2

Fees Associated with Amendment 9

}

~

' ~ -

Request Concerning RHR

  • p" Containment Ccoling 5,.

NRC Docket Nos. 50-254/265

/7

- 'e-1 ILw /

References (a):

T.

J. Rausch letter t o H. R.

Denton dated December 3, 1981.

(b):

W.

O. Miller letter to L.

O.

DelGeorge dated December 30, 1981.

Dear Mr. Miller:

We inadvertently f ailed to supply the required $4,400 fee associated with our Reference (a) request for Technical Specification changes to redefine RHR Containment Cooling at Quad Cities Units 1 and 2.

The $4,400 sum is enclosed, per your Reference (b) request.

We regret any inconvenience this may have caused you.

Very truly yours.

M@S W/RW Thomas J. Rausch Nuclear Licensing Adminstration Boiling Water Reactors Enclosure 4"F '-

.123// Y e

1m Y W**

s

?

/ - // - r a.....

3175N C

/ - /f ' I3,,

8201200561 820107 S,6, g

  • i

J PDR ADOCK 05000254 P

PDR

Ae:

/ [7//1 1p U. 4.44/(k (g,a l

  1. $ eco P A E. edsy :

1 NOTE:

The $4,400 fees for the QC 1/2 Tech Spec change regarding the RHR Containment Cooling Cross-Tie request dated 12/03/81, wa s processed by Voucher

  1. V67909.

This check was inadvertently then sent with the Dresden 2/3 Tech Spec change concerning Appendix J dated 11/30/81.

The NRC, therefore, never received the QC $4,400 fee, and Dresden 2/3 functions were not charged for their fee.

This

$4,400 voucher will, therefore, be charged to Dresden 2/3, even though the NRC believes it applies to QC 1/2.

fkc~ M Thomas J. Rausch 3175N

4 January 18, 1982

  • :. c

?:0TE T0:

Mil.e Collins & Don Lanham, DSB (016) i

' FROM:

Reba Diggs, License Fee anage:nent Eranch, ADM

SUBJECT:

PROCESSIf!G LETTERS HITH CHECKS RECEIVED DIRECTLY BY THE LICEllSE F,EE MANAGEMENT BRANCH Please process the enclosed letter under the applicable docket and give' the following distribution under code M008:

Original of ltr to Regulatory Docket File Action Cy w/ check to W. O. Miller, LFMB (L-233) 3 cys to applicable Branch of DDR or DPM 1 to LPDR 1 to PDR I am retaining the check and the following information is for your records.

Check No.:

122.n 4 Amount:

$4,400 Date:

1/11/82 Ltr. Date:

1/7/82

~

Applicant:

Coninonwealth Edison Company Docket No:

50-254/265 Plant:

Quad-Cities 1 and 2 Thanks!

ph A'

Reba M. Diggs License Fee Manacement Branch Office of Administration O

e o

1 e

l

~'

-