ML20039G259
| ML20039G259 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/11/1981 |
| From: | Cowan F BAKER & BOTTS, JOINT APPLICANTS - SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT |
| To: | Citizens Concerned About Nuclear Power, INC., CITIZENS FOR EQUITABLE UTILITIES |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8201150432 | |
| Download: ML20039G259 (67) | |
Text
%:
pEIAT15 Colut.k royngy ce C:yEi!
4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLFAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOA Li :..
- ain IN THE MATTER OF S
EM! Qg[
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER S
S DOCKET NOS. STN 50-4980L S
STN 50-4990L (SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT S
UNITS 1 AND 2)
S l
DOCUMENTS PRODUCED PURSUANT TO CEU AND CCANP JOINT INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
~
OF DOCUMENTS DATED DECEMBER 21, 1981 I
In response to a document entitled "CEU and CCANP Joint Interrofatories (sic) and Request for Production of Documents to Houston Lighting and Power pursuant to Board Order of December
, 1981," Houston Lighting & Power Company (HL&P), Project Manager of the South Texas Project, acting on behalf of itself and other Applicants, agreed i
to produce the various documents contained herein.
The numbered tabs correspond to the interrogatory pursuant to which the document is being produced.
For identification of the documents, refer'to the relevant interrogatory answer.
lI l
m p
S 4
/
Wb 'l?a Q
k 2
lf, ggoS7.pe.? I 5
~~
8201150432 811211 PDR ADOCK 05000498 G
1 I
t Respectfully submitted
^
f W,
OF COUNSEL:
Finis E.
Cowan
/
Baker & Botts Thomas B.
Hudson, Jr.
3000 One Shell Plaza 3000 One Shell Plaza Houston, Texas 77002 Houston, Texas 77002 Lowenstein, Newman, Reis Jack R.
Newman
& Axelrad Maarice Axelrad 1025 Connecticut Ave.
N.W.
Alvin H. Gutterman Washington, D.C.
20036 1025 Connecticut Ave.
N.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 Attorneys for HOUSTON LIGHTING &
POWER COMPANY, Project Manager of the South Texas Project, I
acting herein on behalf of itself and the other Applicants, THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS, I
acting by and through the City Public Service Board of the City of San Antonio, CENTRAL POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY and THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS I
I l
'I l
I I
I I
I
I l
l 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS I
4.
Minutes of June 5, 1981, Meeting (ST-HL-19345) l 7.
NCR ST-5A (ST-HL-19421) 11.
Draft Stop Work Notic'e dated June 5, 1981
(
16.
NCR ST-5 (ST-HL-17615) 18.
Documents Related to August 10, 1981, Meeting 19.
Memo Documenting Closure of NCR ST-5A (ST-HL-21234) lI l
30.
B&R Response to NCR ST-5A (ST-BR-HL-40374) and (ST-BR-HL-40368) l 38.
Notes taken at June 11, 1981, meeti'.g 41.
Letter from R.
J. Vurpillat to P A. Frazar (ST-BR-HL-40268)
Letter from R. A.
Frazar to R. J. Vurpillat (ST-HL-BR-6443) 43.
Memo from G.
W.
Oprea to R.
L.
Ulrey re: HBR-43 Audit Report 51.
Resumes of H.
G.
Overstreet and R.
M.
McDaniel l
l 53.
HL&P QA organizational chart as of August 1, 1981 57.
Section 6.4.3.1 - 6.4.3.3 of PSQP-A9 61.
NCR Log I
I I
'I 1
,I lI I
'g*.
Houston Lighting & Power Company b75-STP B000p2 OFFICE M ORANDUM To Mr. H. G. Overstreet June 5, 1981 ST-HL-19345 Mr. S. A. Viaclovsk, /
SFN:
Q-7050 from Subicer MINLTES OF MEETING P.RTAINING TO SOUTH TEXAS JOINT NUCLEAR PROJECT DESIGN REVIEW FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION ACCESSIBILITY ATTENDEES I
Mr. S. A. Viaclovsky 3
Mr. R. L. Ulrey gp 2 R19@
I Mr. H. G. Overrtreet Mr. R. A. F-Mr. H. R. Hesioence g otSTRIBUTION g Mr. P. W. Ratter PURPOSE The purpose of the meeting wrs to discuss des.p..eview for inservice The inspection accessiblity being perfo =ed on the South Texas Project.
responsibilities of Brown & Rooi. sB&R), Houston Lighting & Power (HL&P), and Southwest Research Institute (SwRI) were discussed.
DISCUSSION I
The =eeting was chaired by Mr. S. A. Viaclovsky. He presented an overview of access design review activities. He discussed the following specific items:
1.
Initial Access Design Review Contract The scope of services was defined in the purchase order (L-15312).
The contract terminated in early 1980, because SwRI co:pleted the scope of work.
SwRI was aeth ely involved in providing technical consulting services to HL&P under the contract.
2.
Current PSI /ISI Contract With SwRI In order to continue utilizing SwRI services pertaining to access design review, SwRI was instructed to utilize the PSI /ISI purchase order (A-41073) for billing purposes.
Phase 9 "Special Tasks ** was used.
It includes all tasks thr.t were not anticipated at the time I
of the SwRI proposal. EL&P has defined the tasks that SwRI was to perform in Requests for Contract Exs=1 nation Agency Services Numbers 1 through 12 and le::ers ST-HL-SW-86 and ST-ML-SW-87.
3.
New Proposed Consulting Contract With SwRI HL&P will issue a consulting contract to SwRI shortly which will define the scope of services to be perfor=ed.
RECENEO yjN 17 IN a
T-s g
+6 Houston Lighting & Power Company OFFICE 5tE510RANDU51 I
To June 5, 1981 ST-HL-19345 l
Eram SFN:
Q-7050 Sub/ect MINUTES OF MEETING PERTAINING TO SOUTH TEXAS JOINT NUCLEAR PROJECT DESIGN REVIEW FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION ACCESSIBILITY
-2 I
l 4.
Quality Recuirements i
In all the contracts discussed above, no quality requirements were s tipula ted.
This is because SwRI has no design responsibility and r
i g g g only providing HL&P with technical opinions and recommenda-g tions (i.e. SwRI is not responsible for the design engineering to correct access identified proble=s).
SwRI does not include access review.under their QA Progras nor do they have impleranting I
procedures.
5.
ISI Responsibilities Defined In ovember of 1980, a meeting was held with B&R and a document developed (GM-75973) which discusses the responsibilities of B&R I
and an ISI consultant (SwRI). This docu=ent was to be used to for=ulate an interface agreement between HL&P (ISI consultant is to be an extension of HL&P) and B&R.
This interface agreement g,
will be developed as soon as the responsiblities of H.,&P and B&R
, g are cleared up.
6.
H'&P STP Project Encineerinz Mr. H. R. Hesidence who has been assigned to work with Project Engineering is responsible for monitoring the B&R Access Progras.
As he identifies problems, they are conveyed to B&R for resolution through the use of Project Engineering Procedures.
1 Mr. Hesidence is not performing design engineering work, he is
,I only =onitoring to identify access problems which may not have been identified by B&R.
He is developing a Project Engineering Procedure on Access Design Review which will identify the scope of I
his activities.
Reference shall also be made to Project Engineering Procedure on Organi=ation and Responsibilities which defines his responsibilities.
Note that B&R has the pri=e ilE responsibility for the design of the plant and the imple=entation l3 of an Access Design Review Program.
7.
B&R I=clemen:ine Procedures
,I l
It is clear that since B&R is responsible for the design they must l
utilize procedures which define the access design review function.
At this ti=e, B&R has no i=plementing procedures.
This problem has been identified in HL&P Nonconfor ance Reoort ST-5.
Actions are underway by B&R to resolve this problems.
- I
Houston Lighting & Power Company g.~,,,
OFFICE ME5 TOR ANDUM To June 5, 1981 I
ST-HL-19345 from SFN:
Q-7050 Subject MINUTES OF MEETING PERTAINING TO SOUTH TEXAS JOINT NUCLEAR PROJECT DESIGN REVIEW FOR INSERVICE INSPECTION ACCESSIBILITY
-3 I
8.
B&R Technical Reference Document (TRD) on Inservice Inscection B&R in their ISI Manual (since 1974) has had criteria related to access design review. This criteria was prepared by SwRI and was given to B6R by HL&P.
B&R elected to utill:e some of the SwRI criteria in their program.
In late 1980, it was decided to expand the scope of the ISI Manual and change it into a Technical Reference Document, which aill include access criteria along with much more infor=ation. This TRD is to be issued in June of 1981.
It was deter =ined in Audit BR-25 that the original B&R ISI Manual had not been updated since 1976 and a revision was required. This I
brings us to the current stage of revision of the ISI Manual to a TRD. The point is that access criteria did exist, but imple=enting procedures were never developed.
SUMMARY
I It was deter =ined that Mr. H. R. Hesidence and Mr. H. G. Overstreet would develop appropriate nonconfor:ance reports and utilize these as a basis for a potential Stop-Work regarding access design review activities.
Appropriate personnel will be conferred with to review the infor:ation and I
determine the next course of action.
SAV:33 Messrs.
R. A. Frazar J. L. Blau I
Attendees Internal Outgoing File Project Correspondence ST-001.1 I~
I I
I E
I
HL&P 1004 A ;640) l Hous n Lighting & Power Co
?any OFFICE MEMORANDUM June 11, 1981 i
To J. L. Blau from H. G. Overstreet Subject NONCONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) ST-5A SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC CENEDATING STATION Re:
NCR ST-5 issued November 14, 1980, was dispositioned by Brown &
Root, Inc. (B&R) December 15, 1980.
Mr. S. A. Viaclovsky acknowledged in the above referenced 1ctter that the disposition is unsatisfactory. During I
the interi= while a satisfactory resolution is still in process an additional' concern has been discovered that is relevant to the original deficiency.
Attached is a new issue of this NCR designated ST-5A, which incor-porates the additional concern in the body of the NCR. This NCR, ST-5A, super-cedes ST-5 and should be used for further disposition purposes.
I Please ensure all required personnel and organizations receive copies of this modified NCR.
This office is responsible for tracking this NCR, therefore; all correspondence pertinent to this NCR should be carbon copied to this office.
Examples include but are not limited to: Telephone minutes, telecopies, I
letters, HL-BR. BR-HL, BR-XX, XX-BR, EL-HL, etc.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
l Attach =ent
=
cc: Messrs. R. A. Romeo S. A. Viaclovsky M. L. Ward i
Ms.
E. R. Wirtanen 5 ""5 RECE!VED J
l JUN 151981 e
J.L.BLAU ll 1
I lB
!I
Ht.CP S ;g? (3 Cg)
HOUSTON LIGHTING Q POWER CGMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT smpany pouston Lighting & Power I(2)
PMO.'E CT:
C""*h Tae (1) NCR NO.
ET-5A uNir NO.
1-2 (3) OR G ANIZ ATIO N:
(5) C.O.
Brown & ROOT, Inc. Engineering Ref:
A. E. Contract N/A l 5 (S) ITEM:
(7) IDENTIFICATION NO.:
I(8) HE AT/ LOT /B ATCH NO.:
l Access and Design Review N/A l
N/A l"'""*'N-A l"""^"*N-A (n DOCuuENT VIOLATE 'FSAR Section 5.2 and 17.1 rc n) finrntn A--e
'4y it r-4*e-4--
Tvv v4 i
(12) ' DESCRIPTION OF NO' CO'N'F ORM A rvCE:
N Brown & ROOT. Inc. Encineerine does not have innlenentine procedures for assurian access and perf0 mine desien reviews for cecessibility for Inservice Inspections.
The Brown &
Root. Tnc. necess -enun1 has not been todeted since 1976 and Brown & Roor. Inc. is i
p-o e o n t _v po-f n~4 ng A-mu4 n g vovi oue mnA scen-4ng accoce fnv PRT/TRT m c *4 vi c ie s._ Further 1
1"~estip**cn re?aels the* these dradng revir t:c 2re being perfemd to *Se tack"ical requirere_ts of 2 draft TM.
(131 REPORT DBY-l (14J INSPECTION AGENCY:
l (13) DATE:
F. H./Sv1 Via c10ts'rv N/A S/8!8/
6////:DATE'N s/(W/A[P OV AL:
g TREND OsfTKSO4Y l (17)
(16) f1 V I
s-c 8
(IB)
'I. DISPOSITION:
a 4
J B
l (19) 13 SPECIFICAT!ON CHANGE REQUIRED 7 YES NO (20) SUBMITTED BY:
1 (21) TIT LE/COM P AN Y I (22) DATE:
i 1
I e
Ill. RE WIEW AND APPROV AL OF DISPOSITION:
1 DATE:
1 (231 HL&P ENGINE E RING:
I IV. CORRECTIVE ACTION.
(22) CAR NO.:
REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED SIGN / DATE:
V. VE RIFICATION:
SATISF ACTO R Y UNSATISF ACTORY NOT REQUIRED (25) *5RFC RMED BY-CO MP AN Y:
DATE (21) KE M AR KS:
QA HEVIEW/ CLOSURE DATE-(27)
I g
The Light Company Houston Lighting 1 Power no. sox 1700 Heuston, Texas 77001 (713)ees c2li i
'g June 5, 1981 3
ST-HL-BR-SFN: Q-7010 I
Mr. J. L. Hawks Project Engineering Manager Brown & Root, Inc.
P. O. B:x 3 Mcaston, Texas 77001~
~
Subject:
Stop Work Order: Access Design Review Activity SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION
Dear Mr. Hawks:
As a result of additional review by HL&P and the events and activities associated with the subject of NCR-ST-5, we have determined that these condi-tions are unsatisfactory.
Therefore, HL&P is reissuing the NCR as ST-5A (attached) and ordering a stop work caer until the following items have been accomplished.
1.
Publication of TRD 4U10PQOO7-A.
2.
Publication of a list of procedures and or procedure changes required i
to define, implement and control the B&R Access Program.
This list shall include a firm schedule for issuing the required documents for general usage.
3.
Publication of a B&R analysis of the impact on the South Texas Project resulting from having performed access review activities with out the benefit of items 1 and 2.
This analysis shall include a recommended course of action necessary to resolve those items identified by this analysis.
I-I
I Houston Lighting & Power Compam Page 2 4
Publication of a firm schedule for accomplishing items 1, 2 and 3.
If you have questions regarding any of the above, please contact Mr. H. R. Hesidence at 676-8107.
Very truly yours, J. L. Blau I
Project Engineering Manager South Texas Project
~
HRH/a5 Attachment I
cc:
S. M. Dew D. S. McCoy I
H. S. Cameron H. W. Peverley -
S. A. Viaclovsky H. R. Hesidence I
W. R. Reddell i
R. A. Romeo H. G. Overstreet I
J.
Erdos (B&R)
E. W. Lee (B&R)
J. B. Blakley (B&R)
I STP RMS STP Engineering File B&R DCC i
I I
i 1
i I
HL &P 1CCEA (6-80) l~.
Houst C fighting & Power Cor
~'.ly OFFICE MEMORANDUM
~ November 21, 1980 To
- r. A. J. Granger ST-HL-17615 SFN: Q-0100 From fr. H. G. Overstreet
.~
Subject NONCONFOR"..ANCE REPORT NO. ST-5 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Please find attached the subject NCR for disposition. You are requested to provide disposition on the NCR by Dece=ber 19, 1980.
RMM:ya cc: Messrs. R. A. Frazar I
R. L. Ulrey J. L. Blau R. A. Ro:seo STP RMS I
I i
E I
r--_
i RECEiv nl l
<..: 2 ~;;ca ~
Qg;s in i ~_.
I I
I I
---~--e-,-m-.
t
. - - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - + -.. - - -
M LS# 537 (3CC)
\\
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER cOMPAN)
Icsm$
QUALITY ASSURANCE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT pany I
custon Lightingle Power
..s.,,
e,.-
r
. s,.,
ST-5 (2) PROJE CT:
UNIT NO.
1 _2 (3) OnG ANIZATION:
(4) PURCHASE ORDER NC.
(5) C.O.
Brown 5 Root Inc. Engineering Ref:
A. E. Contract N/A l
C) ITEM:
(7) IDENTIFICATsON NO.:
l(8) HE AT/ LOT / BATCH NO.:
Access and Design Review N/A N/A C) DOCUMENT VIOLATED: FSAR Section S.2 and 17.1 I" ) **V-D' 3 '^d^-
1 l
(5.01 (10CFR50, Aueendix B Criterion III-Vi!
NA
' ~ NA (12) DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
t Brown 6 Root Engineering does not have implementing procedures for assuring access and lN performing design reviews for accessibility for Inservice inspectioni The Ernwn F. Pnnf
(
necess manual has not been updated since 1976 and Brown 6 Root is presentiv Derfominz d
drawing reviews and assuring access for PSI /ISI activities.
i J
lE
{
(13) REPOR
. e (14) INSPECTION AGEP;CY:
l (15) DATE:
I
.S
-l N/A
! November 14 19Rn (til REVIE[/ APPROVAL:
g' (17) DATE:
h l
Trend Category EC
////7/TO (16) II. DISPOSITION:
9
,a
' il 1
E 11 E
(19) 13 SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUIRED 7 YES NO (20) SUBMITTED BY:
1 (21) TITLE / COMPANY I (22) DATE:
I l
i I
all. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF DISPOSITION:
DATE:
(23) HL&P ENGINEE RING:
I IV. CORRECTIVE ACTION:
(24) CAR No.:
REOd1 RED NOT REQUIRED SIGN / OATE:
V. VERIFICATION:
SATISF ACTO R Y UNSATISP ACTO 9 Y NOT REQUIRED l'?S1 PE RFO RME D BY?
COMPANY?
DATE:
(26) R E M A R KS:
1 r2n A
OA 11EVIEW/CLOSUR e DATE:
f.NY
{
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COf SOUTH IEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION l-MEE; NG NOTICE B&R Bldg. 03 TO: SUGGESTED PARTICIPANTS MEETING PLACE: 8th Fl. Conf. Rm.
I (MEETING FROM:
H. R. Hesidence INITI ATOR)
MEETING DATE: 8 10-81 DATE ISSUED: 8-04-81 MEETING TIME:
1 P.M.
SUBJECT:
H. R. Hesidence SECRETARY:
MEETING PURPOSE:
Discussion & resolution of ST-5A, i.e., B&R Access Design Review Procedures, g
I SUGG ESTE I
SUGGESTED PA RTICIPAN, %
REPRESENTING PARTICIPANTS REPRESENTING J. L. Hawks #/[V B&R J.L.Wawrzefiak B&R J. B. Blakley B&R I
K. R. Cook B&R J.L.Bl_auVS HL&P H. G. OvWstreet HL&P I
I MEETING AGENDA:
HL&P 1.
Brief Review of ST-5A.
HL&P 2.
Application of Appendix "B",
l l HL&P 3.
Definition of Access Design Review @ B&R.
m B&R 4.
Discussion of B&R Procedure problems.
5.
Other items of importance.
6.
Summary of discussion and assignments of action items.
I HL&P I
I I-cc: Project Services & Administration Attendees:
S. A. Viaclovsky 8
R. L. Ulrey E. R. Wirtanen
nit.:. e i i W]
E l
l-g jo-f; L-.o 5 'U"c Agv l-
)}#15 f
,I gg ggum.
R }P ga sy? &a g
5 to. (l, chau-N& ff' aecessas %,
I y9 Ouasuus Mc4) 62,4
~
I
.3 L %
th U Fa i.
I-l
~i.
FL ldA4%%%An S I [L QR.
$ b Y A a J !c (
$d YD j
3.3.16Wq 5#f RPr^1c= D 5b I
,I I
I I
I I
o
ll0USlon bighling N power Company W'Wk OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM To H. G. Overstreet August 19, 1981 ST-HL-From H. R. Hesidence SFN:
Q-7000 Subject NCR ST-5A, Meeting Minutes - Augus t 10, 1981 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Attendees:
I Mr< J. L. Hawks B&R Mr. J. L. Wawrzeniak B&R tir. J. B. Blakley B&R Mr. J. L. Blau HL&P Mr. H. G. Overstreet HL&P Mr. H. R. Hesidence HL&P Mr. W. R. Reddell HL&P B&R Reference Documents:
STP-SD-002 - Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriptions STp.nc 015 - Er.gineering Procedure for Design Verification Form 200.73 - Record for Design Input Requirements I
JU10PQ007
- ISI TRD The meeti..; was chaired by Mr. Hesidence.
The opening remarks by Mr. Hesidence briefly traced the recent history of events related to ST-5A.
The remarks ware followed by some clarifying discussion, however, no signi-ficant changes were noted with regard to the ST-5A t : story.
Mr. Hesidence went on to relate the requirements of ST-5A to 10 CFR 50 Appendix "B, ANSI N45.2, ASME Section XI and the STF FSAR.
No objections or comments to these relationships were noted.
Mr. Hesidence continued with a brief description of the definition of the B&R ISI Engineer (Access Engineer) and his duties as related to the B&R design engineering acti vi ty.
This definition is as follows:
The access design engineer (ISI Engineer) at B&R does not perform plant design or cesign verification of any plant compo-nercs or systems.
He does perform an analysis of the various drawings to determine if the access pr ovided by the design I
IlOliblOll blglllking o.
l'U W t31' LOlll})dlly 0FFICE MEMORANDUM Fror:
subject Pa9e 2 engineer is adequate.
If a design change is required, I
the design engineer (not the access engineer) will re-design the component, system or structure in order to satisfy the 4U10PQ007 TRD requirement.
Mr. Hawks and Mr. Wawrzeniak agreed with the essentials of the definition and made the point that access design review is the resconsibi-I lity of the DPE (Discipline Project Engineer) who is respcnsible for writing and developing all SDD's (System Design Description) which involves the use of B&R Form 200.73.
It was later determined that this form is specified as a part of numerous other requirements by B&R procedure STP-SD-002 (System Design Descriptions).
Mr. Hawks and Mr. Wawrzeniak determined that the new TRD 4U10PQ007 shall be invoked as an integral part of the design verification process whicn is controlled by B&R procedure STP-DC-015.
This procedure requires the design verifier to perform design verification of each of the documents identified on Form 200.73.
Subsequent to the above meeting a detailed review of the two B&R procedu. es was performed by Mr. Hesidence.
The procedure review resulted in the following observations.
STP-SD-002 Rev. B Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriotions All SDD's shall have a section which describes the requirements
~
for " Access" and " Inservice Inspection" as specified by Appendix A or Appendix B of this procedure.
Since the aporoval of 4U10PQ007, these I
liouston Lightilig a l'ower Gonipany OFFICE MEMOR ANDUM I
~
From Subject Page 3 sections will new specify that this TRD is a requirement of those SDD's which are ASME Class 1, 2 or 3 or encompass Class 1, 2 or 3 components.
STP-DC-015 Rey. H Engineering Procedure for Design Verification Paragraph 2.3.5 " Method" directs the design reviewer to consider the " characteristics" of Table 3 during his design verification process.
Table 3 Item 7 addresses the subject of accessibility i.e. ISI TRD.
In order to implement those items discussed in the 08/10/81 meeting, HL&P has determined that the following actions are required:
I ST-DC-015 Engineering Procedure for Design Verification Verify that persons eligible for assignment as a verifier per paragraph 2.3.4 are or were included in the 4U10PQ007 training activity.
Change Table 1 Item Nurrber 7 to require " verification and checking of SDD's and Spec.'s along with the drawings which now require this activity.
Delete reference to 1U0Df1001 in Table 3 Item 7 and reference 4U10PQ007 and delete the words "should be considered" and require the
(
application of the TRD to ASME Class 1, 2 and 3 components and systems.
B&R should consider the following action and determine if action l
is required:
STP-SD-002 Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriptions i
Identify the 4U10PQ007 TRD as an appropriate document for all ASME Class 1, 2 or 3 components or systems in a manner similar to the ALARA pre-sentation in this procedure.
liL&P Project QA should followup and verify the implementation of the above acticns or the implementation of acceptable alternative actions.
Upon
llouston Lighting & Power Company OFFICE MEMORANDUM i
To From Subject Page 4 satisfactory incorporation of the above ST-5A will be considered closed.
HRH/ah cc: Attendees R. L. UlFey S. A. Viaclovsky I
STP Engineering File STP RMS I.
I I
I I
'I I
I I
.g I
, I
'I
O
.e Q
G G
e 1
_E 10l.2I I
TC S~b
.5b SM.)Y, v,.
l 1
- $e 4
D
/ _,+3 A _ a L _'. ' M _/w w 2 L d s !.,
4_
v v
NSY h
1J~'. _lZ M k M _}p,.4%-.:.,.E4.CM<D
%tr y
Y
.].b"-< n Z hs
.., ?
W.
Y!
h
&a sl. hr
.a._
1 dA_adU d2_ 81'irL_TMLkch._. _.
12w
_~n:;L L 1 3
M W,c; ~__ s-.
o @... d. R,.. $ h..,b
/
g.
.t i
~ &, _ v_ A p. a.. ) y e w. 4 mpy _e-i -
a.
g
_ j i
i t
9 i
1 zi zi: 111En z 1:1.
D --- -
1-l a
1 lD i
- -g i
Hous' n Lighting & Power Co pany g
OFFICE MEMORANDUM To H. G. Overstreet Augus t 31, 1981 I
ST-HL-22030 From H. R. Hesidence SFN: Q-7000 Subicct NCR ST-5A, Meeting Minutes - August 10, 1981 SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION Attendees:
Mr. J. L. Hawks B&R -
I Mr. J. L. Wawrzeniak B&R Mr. J. B. Blakley B&R I
Mr. J. L. Blau HL&P Mr. H. G. Overstreet HL&P Mr. H. R. Hesidence HL&P Mr. W. R. Reddell HL&P B&R Reference Documents:
STP-SD-002 - Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriptions STP-DC-015 - Engineering Procedure for De;ign Verification 4 0 0 Q b7 -
D The meeting was chaired by Mr. Hesidence.
The opening remarks by I
Mr. Hesidence briefly traced the recent history of events related to ST-5A.
The remarks were followed by some clarifying discussion, however, no signi-ficant changes were noted with regard to the ST-5A history.
l Mr. Hesidence went on to relate the requirements of ST-5A to 10 CFR 50 Appendix "B", ANSI N45.2, ASME Section XI and the STP FSAR.
No l
objections or comments to these relationships were noted. Mr. Hesidence I
continued with a brief description of the definition of the B&R ISI Engineer
( Access Engineer) and his duties as related to the B&R design engineering acti vi ty.
This definition is as follows:
The accecs design engineer (ISI Engineer) at B&R does not l
perform plant design or design verification of any plant com-g ponents or systems.
He does perform an analysis of the various i
l 3 drawings to determine if the access provided by the design engineer is adequate.
If a design change is required, the design engineer (not the access engineer) will redesign the g
lg component, system or structure in order to satisfy the 4UO10PQ007 TRD requirement.
l Mr. Hawks and Mr. Wawrzeniak agreed with the essentials of the definition and made the point that access design review is the responsibi-I lity of the DPE (Discipline Project Engineer) who is responsible for writing and developing all SDD's (System Design Description) which involves the use of B&R Form 200.73.
It was later determined that this form is specified as l
a part of numerous other requirements by B&R procedure STP-SD-002 (System Design Descriptions).
.. s 39 1 198i
- g
.ur-
g Hous' n Lighting & Power Ce pany OFFICE ME5 TOR ANDU51 From subject ST-HL-22030 Page 2 Mr. Hawks and Mr. Wawrzeniak determined that the new TRD 4U010PQ007 shall be invoked as an integral part of the design verification process which is controlled by B&R procedure STP-DC-015.
This procedure requires I
the design verifier to verify that each of the documents identified on Form 200.73 was incorporated in the SDD.
Subsequent to the above meeting a detailed review of the two B&R procedures was performed by Mr. Hesidence.
The procedure review resulted in the following observations.
I STP-SD-002 Rev. B Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriptions All SDD's shall have a section which describes the requirements for " Access" and " Inservice Inspedion" as specified by Appendix A or Appendix B of this procedure.
Since the approval of 4U010PQ007, these I
sections will now specify that this TRD is a requirement of those SDD's which are ASME Class 1, 2 cr 3 or encompass Class 1, 2 or 3 components.
STP-DC-015 Rev. H Engineering Procedure for Design Verification I
Paragraph 2.3.5 " Method" directs the design reviewer to consider the " characteristics" of Table 3 during his design verification process.
Table 3 Item 7 addresses the subject of accessibility i.e. ISI TRD.
In order to implement those items discussed in the 08/10/81 meeting, HL&P has determined that the following actions are required:
ST-DC-015 Engineering Procedure for Design Verification Include persons eligible for assignment as a verifier per para-grapn 2.3.4 are or were included in the 4UO10PQOO7 training activity.
I Delete reference to 10010MM001 in Table 3 Item 7 and reference 4U010PQ007 and delete the words "should be considered" and require the application of the TRD to ASME Class 1, 2 and 3 components and systems.
B&R should consider the foliawing action and determine if action is required:
STP-SD-002 Engineering Procedure for System Design Descriptions I
Identify the 4UO10PQOO7 TRD as an appreoriate document for all ASME Class 1, 2 or 3.
I
lg llous' n Lighting & Power Ce pany OFFICE MEMORANDUM To
\\
i From I
Subiect ST-HL-22030 l
Page 3 HL&P Project QA should followup the implementation of the above actions.
HRH/ah cc: Attendees R. L. Ulrey S. A. Viaclovsky STP Engineering File STP RMS I
I I
I 1 I l
LI l I I
I I
I
- 'I
400STOM LIGHTING il C'!b.R COMPANY kU I
wuse: (s ser EicGINEERING OEP ARTMC.tt
.PS ER _
_ D a te Checked E
- dv PROJECT I
whoLe a
g h.s,5o 2c A e o W 2 5 R 4 6 I
A)R kcess
~ /L i
&Y /$
k A-CC P A h y
S+
- {ff"/'M & N S dA l
- fA 9 Q FMM E
u pup u u a 4 a 9 >z n a zS 64 k p - 4 M y& ~ 7m d s fl%
s l
ags W y of A ala o J/ a Q Ape wd q w -*3/ankup_
E d
k y)/hiw 4 <-zd~ &
an g
O s - f} w A.)Y m /ww W.
g
%^ he
- l gaf 3 EwdgD&
f I
Lf y
N IX I
t
~l M
l
/
=
H0OSION LIGHilNG & PlanEH COMPANY e,s P 2 os oi ERGINEER;NG DEPARVMENT By Check d Date PS ER
' PROJECT e
i swM-K %gj I
g uLa
'P: ( io cfe O.4 MLL
.2) g
\\I w
deay,' ad L p/
9 r4 srdw
!gpsf[* / r %
a, orzdf+ 'ZidfhQ. eMT wnLyn @pw ap @
L k,9 e
gur Ifa 95 waA -
- wa s
I sy M.
g I
A'""
f #"" A 'W 6
d e p 0 xy A Tg n,,x_,j;w:;,
I en
_g
- I y
phey cMa 24 Mf]'AWW&
/*&W f
l aa y a k ~up-I yM.
,I I
I I
I I
/
huuhl 0N L Util e. 2. o.dH GUfv1FAfD ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT By Checked Data PS ER P _ Ecz kpg
/
s+- s wran s6/-g lff>
Sr-sn Jun -2 g
d A-k/
k-E. N L'e O L:.v'e 2-q
'o
> s w s s, e m M,,e 4 e tc e.o I
i n y %macrs m.
nd
^
I
- s rY T A>
sAr y p a c_c o M
/
e Acce ss o~p %
I h)po~At lll ca-) i", && f &
7 a
.a l
WAsr sym,n
&C g
c) u&
ed.'// n8 r2 x,
a m) f o s c,s I
I
~
I I
T,,.
" 92I.
I a
HOUSTON LIGHTING & POWER COMPANY
/
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION (
o MEETING NOTICE
_c.
B&R Bldg. 03 TO: SUGGESTED PARTICIPANTS MEETING PLACE: 8th F1 Conf. Rm.
/
(MEETING I
FROM:
H. R. Hesidence 7
INITIA TOR)
MEETING DATE:
8 81
/ /
DATE ISSUED: 8-04-81 MEETING TIME:
1 P.M.
SU8)ECT:
NCR ST-5 A CHAIRMAN: v'. R. Hesidence SECRETAR Y:
I MEETING PURPOSE:
Discussion & resolution of ST-5A, i.e., B&R Access Design Review Procedures.
I SUr.GESTED I
I PAUTICIPANJh SUGG ESTED REPRESENTING PARTICIPANTS REPRESENTING
- 4. '.' Hawks '/W "
B&R
/J. L. Wawrze[jiak B&R
.x.. B. Blakley B&R K. R. Cook B&R M.L.Bl_auYS' HL&P
/ G. OvWstreet HL&P i
I I~
MEETING AGENDA:
HL&P 1.
Brief Review of ST-5A.
I HL&P 2.
Application of Appendix "B",
HL!P 3.
Definition of Access Design Review @ B&R - W O M.
B&R 4.
Discussion of B&R Procedure problems.
5.
Other items of importance.
HL&P 6.
Summary of discussion and assignments of action items.
D) }\\ L x AtA
.A%
~ ~
n
)-
k T)LJ)u w
$ d%AA* * '
.7-y-
j 5 %.':I.','1l0 R f
M ludu M"M O ff #' %~
Aus.
,19m A clq ru o rar~, '
I cum AH h
J. L. It s cc: Project Service'l & Administratio
~~ '
'q
'c j
~~"
Attendees :
I S. A. Vlaclovsky gg 4,tc@y ?Ao c,
()
R. L. U1 rey w o.
E. R. Wirtanen I
STP-0004 (6 7m
. ~
S 10 ))- -._ _ _. _ _.. _.
.-e h h '/g.- - _ _ _.. _ _
l}
N. W
&, e, n
o~_
- 1 2. m,x, a%,. _
y
. 1.
V-
, O k.
L'I... & A..
W'b%W~, AM.C U*
n j
A o.~
f
- ]
y-.ms.v l.N.'<.:enM:s!w &
,~~.w-.
W W e %l4 /L%!..
]._.. _..
[s
-4
_1 rf M.
42.
W D, ' L
_M N-n,d ~ a-s&.J /,*.. _(bNf. a=/ $A..%
_.. -iY.e_ -
.L _
l
.}
!- / ',
l*
W
, L f
%jWSd 1&r'Yf?.W.f*-4 $w'd O ~N '
- W J
/
1
-_.s L
.ee-.._..-.ue
-e-e e.e.
-.--..-...e.-
-....e...
k.--- -_.
4 1
l f --. N -
l i
1 7.__
l 7__
l.
lh l
l l
l l
i
--9-_--._...___~.-
i D
g,........,
u'
~
Housts Lighting & Power Con _ any OFFICE MEMORANDUM September 23, 1981 To
'. L. Blau ST-HL-21234 I
From )
H. G. Overstreet Subject NCR ST-5A, Closure I
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERACING 3TATION Follow-up verification identified that the System Design Description i
procedure STP-SD-002 and the Design Verification procedure STP-DC-015 have been amended to require the design engineers co utilize the PSI /ISI Access I
Design Technical Reference Document when generating or verifying applicable design documents. Training has been conducted on over 50 percent of the required personnel with the remainder to be completed in the near future.
This NCR is closed. Attached is the closed subject NCR.
HGO:lb Attachment cc:
J. E. Geiger I
D. G. Barker J. W. Briskin S. A. Viaclovsky H. R. Hesidence I
D. D. Diamond J. L. Hawks
. g J. L. Wawrzeniak g
i i!I l
l I I
I I
..e vv
.a nue HOUSTON LIGHTmu & iOWER COMPANY
)
REC,"EIVED Q'
QUAllTY ASSURANCE NONCONFORMANCE HEPORT M
g U!N 2.?_1981 louston Lighting & Power r
8IT NO.
P ROJE CT:
%'O ** v"
- 11) NCR NO.
M* M
}-2 (3) ORGANIZATION:
(C. PU RCH ASE ORDE R NO.
(5) C.O.
Erc r 6 Poot, Inc. Engineerine, Ref:
A. L. Contra-t S/A E ITEM:
(7) lOENTIFICATION NO.:
(8) HE AT/ LOT / BATCH NO.:
ACeet.r :rd Desire Revice
- /A g ! /,
}-
g 3
l (10) REV.
l(11) PAR A.
1 DOCUMENT VIOLATED:
'7.
4 P.. I fL f.
( IV T*D i =
a
.2*-
r. e -,,. - - T T _ ty %
(12) DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
BTowC & ROct, Inc.. Ennineerine-does not have irmic~enUne vroue 'ures for acci-in-scemt and perforr.ine desinn' reviews "or acceselbilite for Incervice Insrn tiona.
The Brew i-Foot Inc, er. cess mant:1 has nOt bm - undnte' eince 1976 an.' Eram E Rect. inc. ir
_ r.., c - e f,,,- O c ' / T c T s,
- f -.i a 4 - -
N r*
..3--r mi%,
.J,-.s-1,. - r n.- 4. -e
..,4
_ - c,. -i., -
5
-79,.-~~'y g
a f r n c f f c-n
- f.- --.-
.e M ->
- % c : A r m. ', - rg,2f ae e.- 4. g
'_c4,
..rr a.-.- _ ~ 3 7 *.- t g r. t,7,_ _ si r o,,, s
. -.:.., ~ e e
, A,.. r u
~v c
E
) REPORTEp BY:
3 7 fg l (14) INSPECTION AGENCY:
' (15) DATE:
F. H / 1 vi -b ce :
l N /.A A / 8 ',8,'
g) RE. E W/ APP ROV AL:
j TRENO C4 rEGCAY l (17) DATE:
E
.. f/.I'm y d i
E-C l
&/n'/.O.
y (TE) 11. DISPOSITION:
,e E
Dis;;ositi:n Sec ST-EP.-hl-40ME, Datec July 6,1901 ( Attcched) ur e.
s M
f
) IS SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUIRED?
YES NO t (22) DATE:
(22) SUIMITTED BY:, /
[
je (21) TITLE / COMPANY i >]' y ( _ T *' i '
?
U "82.._..~5.-
- 1 i
f.7 D*
- l Li t' ~
s 1
ATE-
. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF OtSPOSITION:
_h f
(23) HL&P ENGINEERING:
/
(
CORRECTIVE ACTjON:
/.
- O~ "
REQUI R E D NOT RECURRED SIGN / DATE:
) CAR NO.:
V. VERIFICATION:
SATISF ACTORY UNSATISF ACTORY NOT REGdlRED L PERPORMem.
cO MP.~ < :
oATE:
.I I"
h-DiiY
)
a
I-Brown & Root,lnC. Post oirice Box Three, Houston. Texas 77001 July 7, 1981
.7 Houston Lighting & Pcwer Canpan;,
ST-BR-HL-40374 P.O. Box 1700 SFN: Q-0100 Houston, Texas 77001 Attention:
J. L. Blau Prcject Enginecang Manager South Texas Project Electric Generating Station
Subject:
Nonconformance Report ST-5-A
Reference:
ST-HL-BR-6161, dated 6-16-81 l
Gentlemen:
Attached is Engineering's response to the subject Nonconformance Report.
Very truly yours, BROWN & ROOT, INC.
J. L. Hawks Engineering Project Manager South Texas Project i
Electric Generating Station DS//
File No.:
A770G JLH/RWP/JEP/DSH/rd cc:
G. R. Purdy (Site)
R. A. Romeo (HL&P)
R. G. Withrow (Site)
J. R. Molleda (HL&P) ll3 T. L. Porfilio (Site)
B. F. Mitchell E
J. W. Briskin (HL&P)
- 5. A. Viaclovsky J. L. Blau (HL&P)
M. F. Herring G. L. Parker (HL&P)
P. K. Bahl
'H. G. Overstreet (HL&P)
.J. B. Blakley R. L. Ulrey (HL&P)
l
'I
- V Sp9 713 40 HOUSTON UGHTING & POWER COMPANY QUALITY ASSURANCE NONCONFORMANCE REPORT aun 2 2 gggj gompany.
louston Lighting & Power l
i PROJECT:
Cnneh Tovme (1) NCR NO.
ST-5A UNIT NO.
1-2 (5) C.O.
(
ORG ANIZATION (4) PURCHASE ORDER NO Brown & ROOT, Inc. Engineering Ref:
A. E. Contract N/A Access and, Design Review
$/I N/[
DOCUMENT VIOLATED. FSAR Section 5.2 and 17.1 j " ' "'*' N a j '"' '^"^-
(
N-A (C 0% (ine r$O i-nneA4-R a,4*o*4nn TTT_vs.
"M'I DESCRIPTION OF NONCO'N'F ORM ANCE.
E Brown & ROOT. Inc. Encineerine does not have implementinc orOCedures for assurine access an and perfOrcinc desien reviews for accessibility for Inservice Inspections.
The Brown &
Rnct. Tnc. necess annun1 has not been updnred since 1976 and Brown & Root. Inc. is cnr PAT /TRT nerivities.
Further 7vocanel - no-fnv-4ne A -nt.-4 n g rovi ot. e and neenvine nennee irrestigaticr revenir that these drawing revieur 2re being perferred to the technicn1 requirerents of 2 draft TF1 5
M) REPORipo BY:
i (141 INSPECTION AGENCY:
' t15) DATE:
k8!8/
_ F. H./Sv1 Viacle'eskv I
N/A (iriDATE:)M
~ Ov A ug l Tuno c4rrac.<y Rl-lvfwA$P
)
d/
e-c We (18) 11. O.SPOSITION -
Disposition See ST-BR-HL-40368, Dated July 6,1981 ( Attached)
E (19) IS SPECIFICATION CH ANGE REQUIREO?
YES NO 1 (21) TITLE / COMPANY I (22) DATE:
Il SL BMITTED BY: ni s?7 l
AEPM/B&R l July 6,1981 J. u. Wawr Bil. REVIEW ANO MP RO'V AL OF DISPOSITION:
1 OATE:
I g) ML&P ENCINEERING' I
. CORRECTIVE ACTION:
(24) C AR N O.-
R E QUIR E D NOT REQUIRED SIGN / OATE-VE RIFICATION:
SATsSF ACTORY UNS ATISF ACTO RY NOT REQUIRED 1 PERFORME D BY-COMPANY:
OATE-(22) REMARKS.
I E
& HEVIEW/CLOSUR E i DATE:
I (27)
I
I~
I Brown & Root,InC. Post ofnce Box Three, Houston, Texas 77001 A Hathburton Company
=
July 6, 1981 Wby' Houston Lighting & Dower Company ST-BR-HL-40368 P. O. Box 1700 SFN:
Q-7000 Houston, Texas 77001 Attention:
J. L. Blau Project Engineering Manager South Texas Project I
Electric Generating Station Refe rence:
- 1) HL&P Letter ST HL-BR-6161, Dated June 16, 1981 I
H. R. Hesidence To 7. L. Hawks 2)
B&R Letter ST-BR-HL-39635, Dated June 05, 1981 J. L. Hawks To J. L. Blau I
In response to the Reference No.1 letter, Brown & Root, Inc. has re-evaluated the effort being dedicated to the Inservice Inspection and Maintenance Access programs for STP. This re-evaluation has been pre-viously preserted in the Reference No. 2 B&R letter which provided for I
an augumented ISI program to address the concerns indicated in the subject NCR.
As an example, B&R has indicated that all newly issued I
fabrication drawings will require the approval and signature of the B&R l
ISI engineer.
All other drawings are subject to the review by the ISI l
group when ISI requirements are effected and would be so indicated by l
the Discipline Project Engineer (DPE) issuing the drawing.
To aid the l
DPE in making this detennination of ISI applicability of review, the ISI group will hold ISI training sessions for all affected disciplines I
to reinforce the ISI requirements for STP.
This training will be ap-plicable not only to the internal disciplines in Houston, but also to those on the STP Site.
The above drawing review function is already in effect to ensure ISI compliance for the as-designed configuration shown in the physical model as well as on the Composite Drawings, Support Drawings, ASME Pump &
Valve Drawings and Insulation Drawings. New issues, design change notices
'I and/or reviews of these drawings are also subject to the review of the ISI engineer.
In a similar light, the applicable TRD's such as Welding, l
Pipe Erection, Weld Numbering, Support Installation, Insulation, etc. and ASME equipment specifications, will also be subject to the design review process by ISI.
t
,I
BrownifRoot.irc.
Page 2 ST-BR-HL-40368 July 6, 1981 The TRO presenting the above ISI requirements is projected for issuance I
by July 13, 1981, and the training in these requirements is scheduled for completion by the end of this month.
The completion of these tasks and the continual implementation of the ISI program described in Refer-I ence No. 2, will provide the assurance of ISI and maintenance access for the South Texas Project and adequately address the concerns of the subject nonconformance.
I If B&R can be of further assistance in clarifying any of the above in-formation or in answering any questions, kindly contact John Wawrzeniak at 678-9239 or myself.
Very truly yours, BROWN & ROOT, INC.
? ),
I J.(n j
awks
/ Engineering Project Manager USouth Texas Project I
Electric Generating Station File No.:
A010G JLH/JHW/iyg cc:
J. Blakley H. S. Cameron E. Lee R. W. Peverley H. R. Hesidence (HL&P)
S. M. Dew I
ll I
'I
.I t
,-. 613ih m ~
1 l
Muud I
- '= 3 S n
Iu i 13 m a m,1
- ' Ton) u A8\\
He ll c., - ut {Laq.__q s. tLe 5,4 ' h discuss ne ded. cal $ k 4 S S u d-tm.
. %A_wr a... m.
_..% m.&_4 ma2x I ke.p spw cnA.na e at & _.G a Drogn~_~ __.L% akan el <.- d
_l t
I,-6 n td a. ',
-6, m
os A e s
~c~
/s I
A+ w L t.m h.d C<uu #ls P
- / J a A cc..w L4t/P
% LkILeep
_uw_ s Hu.pt st
._l 1
% et-5,, sti v/g
( t_i o,
i+JP/cr Oftf f,s Ls
_L OL.flOAL_
bW N.
n.) %w m n.
wmm miu E
cA %edescJpor wwh h.-m+
wow _m aa
~
.a I'%ep ~_ 7_oc.
A - (L_A i pb e4 th psyms E
i
, t_
cu,.3,.,t m ci,c_ mm_,c..
%,,.g g o, _ y_ _
cac. ok_gk %%b% ~ wk.v k b.N-l 2wu bh%.
w we.
i
.ao_ mow wa_ w
% % __ w - L y s & % L r+
WS N 0-\\S o th-hb
'the 3
% __ B [S. A _ G A Mc-w
-,6 I 's~ A_
3 m n
%w a~
m.v
~
jepk-bd
- usw, c> d s._-f G r _ b e _T __
,l l N.\\d cd s
L%e_
He % w _i w %4mv an a d.w c.d m m p v c p % __ d. e.r.< h-it x ll
'4e pecemJ
-'% iw h d % %
-t'kt no.+ ~ xxvhan 4wmzn+ %d_sk. /L no/- hw ul l!
1 Ap / em. d'
-e t G.,4
~ Rope. 'Tb ce,.41&s.
-to uegR %u h %L;-\\- +cs.w (
ww N
%A-e -~1 ud b& ' E ) ak.s 40 e$$c 4lvdy %$,md &
.g p.o&.% ~ e ~s.,-+
- m.,
u w--
-..t.,
u.%
w i s ~.a
_s Uf 0
Q_w Ch-t_
m m-
_, n _ i _, w I
a d_dp b
G e.,
QJ4 Ng % w a. I C4. a d a m 7hm e -
q )_*oc.__
~
s se
,~~._,
n,,n
+ -
'4 _~w
%_u ms_ __a
% s meu qc-e ~ta 6
4 40
- e. s th_c~h rL<.__
to
3
- zw wuau<wi x
Wlf A& - fisLQ ctg 7wszenos.\\
itus tjii
.3rr g,
p g g yg) t-;
g (k
[e
[
i g.
-MLyhl bu muk &
spdlpf fbwd
'lw
,-:DMi A T W% M nisud ' ad AJu9 @W
~
p I
. ; W;,,. _ %. V ? :?
" f Y. " -.
2 3.
. u n d, : e L g g y,,qR..' 4 94 y,;t,A (e y,7
,4 g g tg
- t4o)
_ la
'f ii::~!
i i:
r &
bu I4
/M.
l
-(g bwjhta-l%' d&cukAng.
~~
En u,L pp a 6 0
t w y-Aaa 6
a y
wl~ Q WM. [% )
8 W.
g A
m uk y5 @E N f 7
~ ~ ~
' Q
~
- 3. % : WLE T
a auaui u h a.y.
d ik @6.Jaud
&L.ju1~yw1vk J
DLC trud.
6 4.
s k > m d lI db1 kh is.
w
- w. &
touuuM 1
/ D. . : - 2 M=.
,l a{m ! &
%d 4 l ls.ga a yA eg n 1 p*A E p 'M
. g i
ilI lE g
t
106 V W I
Brown & Root,lnC. Post office Box Three, Houston, Texas 77001 A Halliburton Company June 30, 1981 kbj' ST-BR-HL-40268 File No. A570G SFN No. QO100 I
Mr. R. A. Frazar Houston Lighting & Power Company P. O. Box 1700 Houston, Texas 77001 Re: QA Program Documents
Dear Mr. Frazar:
On June 11, 1981, we met at the STP site and discussed the role of the
' sg several project QA program documents with Paul Ratter and the HL&P HBR-43 audit team.
I would like to document the understanding that we reached at that meeting so that subsequent activities can be handled promptly and correctly.
l o The highest level B&R QA document applicable to the South Texas Project is the B&R Project QA Manual.
o " Disconnects" between the B&R QA Manual and the various implementing procedures (i.e., QAPs, Corrective Procedures, Engineering Procedures, etc.) should be identified and cor-I rective action taken. This action would normally be revision of the implementing procedure but could conceivably be revision to the QA Manual.
l o The QA Program Description (current revision April 22,1981) is a licensing document. This document should be used in preparing the QA Manual but any differences between the QA l
Manual and the QA Program Description should be made known to you or Jim Geiger an3 me.
We in turn should advise B&R or l
HL&P Licensing so that they can determine if a change should be submitted to the NRC.
l BROWN
. INC.
JUL 131981 J.0.C H 241 DCC DEPT.
l Brownf5 Root.inc.
i j
Mr. R. A. Frazar June 30, 1981 il l
Page 2 If you have any questions, please let me know.
f Very truly yours, BROW & ROOT, INC.
r-MI j
,m
. Vurpillat Quality Assurance Manager RJV:rk cc:
D. G. Barker J. E. Geiger R. L. Ulrey l
P. Ratter K. M. Broom i
E. A. Saltarelli A. H. Geisler l$
i A. W. Smith
'E R. P. Negri
(
D. W. Janecke iE G. R. Purdy lg EDC (2) l lI I
I lI l l I
DL%/
Houston B001854 l
{
Lighting J $
& Power L b ComJany I
August 24, 1981 i
{
Elecinc Tower RO. Box 1700 ST-HL-rR-6443 I
.!!I Houston. Texas 77001 SFN: Q-3200 Mr. R. J. Vurpillat, Jr.
u Manager, Quality Assurance Department I
Brown 5 Root, Inc.
P. O. Box 3 Houston, TX 77001
SUBJECT:
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION RE: ST-BR-HL-40268
Dear Mr. Vurpillat:
Per our conversation on August 19, 1931, regarding your letter of June 30, referenced above, you are requested to instruct your I
auditors to use the Quality Assurance Program Description (QAPD) as a source document for formulating their audit checklists.
Any conflicts between the QAPD and the Brown 5 Root QA Manual and/or procedures discovered c'uring the audit process are to be documented on Audit Deficiency Reports (ADRs).
When there is con-I flict between the QAPD and project quality assurance documents, resolution must occur either by revision of the project document or revision of the QAPD.
QA management is responsible for deciding which resolution is to be chosen.
The QAPD is a dcscription of the policies and commitments of I
tae South Texas Project relative to quality assurance.
For the 2Nrpose of review by the NRC against the Standard Review Plan, the
==
I
@PD also describes generally how certain portions of the quality g
pssurance program are implemented. The QAFD is used as a source I
co ED 50 cadocument for development of the South Texas Project QA Plan, the c=
CY Brown 5 Root QA Manual, and the implementing procedures used on N
Mhe proj ect.
It is also used as a document against which to review MA hese project quality assurance documents and changes thereto, as l
g t
gell as a source document for audit preparation.
Cn
(
2 l
A C:
The QAPD is not in itself a program document to be used for iglementing the quality assurance program, since it is not suffi-t l
ciently detailed to describe how all of the project activities are i
to be controlled. The QAPD is analo;ous to a code or standard or to a Safety Analysis Report section in that the requirements or commitments must be implemented through the various quality assur-ance program documents (manuals, plans, and procedures), or l I AUG 2 5 1981 1
sTPRMS
on '_3;hting & ber Company i
I Mr. R. J. Vurpillat, Jr.
ST-HL-BR-6443 Page 2 I
revision of the QAPD must be submitted to the NRC for review and approval prior to implementation, except that organization changes can be submitted within 30 days after implementation.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to coritact me at 486-3737.
Very truly yours, s
R. A Fra r 'sanager ^
~
Quality Assurancelepartment I
RAF:j ow cc: Messrs. G. W. Oprea, Jr.
I J. H. Goldberg C. G. Robertson D. G. Barker I
J. E. Geiger R. L. Ulrey R. A. Romeo I
I I
I
!I I
/
I
\\
I 4%.-x,..,.,.
,m,..,
4 l
+
e-e
.;n 4 M.D qu 4 7;"fr "az I
J A
g 3
jf
,y
+ ~ ~ - -
ut.sawsu m s w
.y Ant g
W l
& <>~ L- # '"$f N4A
+
E
.,-J2 m
g g
g k> J g
yf AM fU 1*;-:,
g 3 ~s1. a -2
,1DR l
l5bir'eik'S-4.4
- rk I
- .w -
g
.E'
?5
,f-?"*-'. f' a"'"c'IYA')N'. 'A. ' ' * " "~05A b ':
k5 5d"E0
. 7 :, :
n:i]%' ?$~'.c'E '?$[.Y ' ~.~;.'
- ' ~~'*"'*~*^*'
7
~
- w - =.:-
-~.
, e...
ee q
I I= -
.m
~
Ie E-t RESDIE OF 495 Laurel Hill Apt 9M IU.RRY G. OVERSTREET Norwich, Ct.
06360 V'
Employment Objective Perscnal Data:
j Birthdate: October 14, 1947 13 "o1s"c=
1o" Weight:
175 lb.
Marital Status:
Single I,
Health:
Excellent Residence: Rent, Free to Relocate Hobbies: All sports especially tennis and golf, have taught tennis
'I,,
the past few years.
L.-.'M Educational Background I
Aberncthy High School, Abernathy, Texas Graduated 1966 I(,
National Electronics Ins,titute, Denver, Colorado Graduated 1968 Machinist's Mate "A" School, Great Lakes, 7
Illnois Graduated 1968 mj 15 weeks of detailed instruction on a basic steam
.M cycle and operation of steam propulsion components, also introductica to thermodynamics.
i "1
Basic Nuclear Power School, Mare Island, L' 7 Vallejo, California Graduated 1969 Subjects:
Mathematics 137 #f S g,, *.
Classical and Basic Nuclear Physics 118 Thermodynamics (HT & FF) 75 l l Reactor Principles 102 i
Reactor Technology 76 Water Chemistry 43
.E Radiolostcal contro1s 26 5
Plant Materials 32 Mechanical Theory 58 Electrical Theory 26
'o
'.# j
,=p Yh f,4
'P l s V-----.-_.-.---
,,e....,.
t..
.s. :,...
e i
l 1
Educational Background (Cont)
Qualified as Mechanical Operator at Land y
Based Prototype AlU Nuclear Power Training I g' E
Unit, Idaho Falls, Idaho Graduated 1970 Subjects:
Detailed lastruction in Reactor Operation, Operation of Pressurized Water Reactor, Radiological Centrol during Reactor Operation
+
and Maintenance, and Operation of Reactor i
Support Systems.
Engineering Advanced Training Division, Groton, Connecticut Commenced 1970
'i Subjects:
Cocpleted 1974 Quality Control Assurance 40 scs 800 GFD Distilling Unit 80 Steam Components 80 Libr. Air Conditioning 80 Reactor Spill, Accident Training and clean up 20 Flex Hose 40 SSIG Control Oil 80
.4 Military Work Experience USS SEREUS AS-12 4 Months Assigned to M-DIV; Responsibility: Fireroom Watchstander l
USS CASIMIR PULASKI (SSB:;633) BLUE Crew 4 Years 9 Months Assigned to M-DIV; Responsibility: Maintenance and Control of Reactor Plant Mechanical Systems, Operation and Maintenance o of Propulsion Equipment.
Included in my 4 years and 9 months aboard PULASKI were the following:
[
1.
Last ten months of an overhaul / conversion period i
2.
Two menth shakedown cruise ag; 3.
Six week post conversion availability yard period 4.
Seven deterrent patrols I
Qualification aboard PULASKI:
Engineering Watch Supervisor 2 patrols Engincroom Supervisor 5 patrols g.
Machinery Two Lower Level 5 patrols 3'
Engineroom Upper Level 6 patrols l
Enginercom Lower Level Shakedown and 7 patrols Shutdown Roving Watch 6 patrols I..,.
Diesel Engine Watch Shakedown and 7 patrols
- aC C
3 - - -..- - - -
,.l
..~-
~
- &.',::l '.. - :
\\.
I
'While aboard the PULASKI I was assigacd the following responsibilities:
Diesel Fetty Officer 1 Patrol
.,'3 Repair Parts Petty Officer 2 Patrols
- Primary Leading Petty Officer 3 Patrols Secondary Leading Petty Officer 1 Patrol During my last two patrols aboard the PULASKI I was ti respcasible for all M-DIV Quality Control and Assurance, and 3M Documentation.
Military Service 7 Years United States Navy Honorable Discharge References Personal Feferences available on request.
../ )
I x
.3 y
I t.
1 -.,
I
-.g 8!
. I y -.......-...
- w.. ~..
h O(,-
I C0st\\l ANDER Si 11%I AHINF Sol \\llitoN I of I!1f FN 1 \\hf3 PlJUI HF IN 00\\l% LENDING:
MACHINIST MATE FIRST CLASS HARRY GAYZZ OVERSTREET E
UNITED STATES NAVY for service as set forth in the following
(:0 si \\1 t N D tilo s 8
For professional acnievement in the superior perforrance of his duties while serving as a member of the Machinery Division onboard USS CASIMIR PULASKI (SSBN-633) (BUJE) from October 1969 through January 1975. During this period Petty Officer OVERSTREET completed a Poseidon conversion and overhaul and seven Fleet Ballistic i-Missile deterrent patrols. Serving as both the Primary and then Secondary Sys-tems Leading Petty Officer for the Machinery Division, he has displaued superior technical and organizational ab21ity and the tenacity to accor plish anu task in i
an efficient and professional asnner.
His keen interest in the Quality Assurance Program and his strict compliance with technical standards have contributed significantly to the continued high state of naterial readiness of CASIMIR E
PULASKI. Petty Officer OVERSTREET has consistently displayed exceptional initi-ative and dedication to duty.
Particularly noteworthy has been his qualification as Engineering Watch Supervisor, the senior enlisted watchstation in the Engineer-E ing Department. His cowund presence and in-depth knowledge of the propulsion plant hacu been instrumer.::a1 in providing proper supervision of the various propulsion plant watchstanders.
His unfaltering devotion to duty, superior technical competence, and extraordinary leadership ability reflect great credit i
upon himself and are in keeping with the highest traditions of the Submarine Force and the United States Naval Service.
I Y R. Z2WIS E
Ca ain, United States Navy Commander Submarine Scuadron FOURTEEN f
4.3'r p
I l
R E _3 U T1 E Richard fl. licDaniel 3<l65 Constellation Road Lompoc, California 93436 Tel:
(805) 733-1376 PEilS0!iAL Dt@:
Birthdate:
4/2T;/38 flarital Status:
riarried (3) Children l
Height:
5' 9" f4ilitary Status :
Honorable Discharge Weight:
150 Clearance:
Secret I
Health:
Excellent I
CDUCATIO:1:
Rossville High School, Rossville, Georgia Gradua te<J:
1957 Brevard Coinnuaity College, Cocoa, Fla.
I One Semester - Quality Control Principals and Techniques OBJECTIVE:
Desire a position in a Quality Assurance Organization.
EXPERIErtCE:
I Been employed wi th the Boeing Company of Seattle, Washington fron: July 1960 thru present.
Below are the positions I have had with the company:
July 1973 - Presen t Area:
Vandenberg Air Force Base, Cali fornia Position:
Qualil.y Assurance inves tiga tor I
l'es pon's ibi l i ti es :
Conduct and participate.in investinations for the Quality Assurance department to determine the cause and reconacenderJ corrective action for malfunctions of equipment used on company products.
I I
~
-?-
I Other duties include:
1.
Initiate and revise departmental operating directives and procedures.
r:
l 2
Initiate. and coordinate with other departments company operating procedures.
3.
Prepare and coordinate flight releases for Minuteman missile launches.
4.
Maintain status of defective hardware which affects launch operations.
5.
Prepare reports and charts on open discrepancies for the Quality Assurance Manager.
i 6.
Maintain accountability of inspection stamps.
f i
7.
Develop and perform compliance audits.
8.
Initiate cost savings reports for employee ideas and represent the Quality Assurance Organization on the cost savings committee.
l 9.
In,estigate employee sugges tions which af fect Quality Assurance and l
prepare reconmendation for acceptance or rejection.
i i
10.
On discrepancies which affect more than one serial number of like equipment, initiate required paperwork to assure correct action is obtained on all units (located locally or at other company locations).
11.
Assure employee certification in critical processes are obtained and maintained (i.e., soldering, dye penetrant, connector molding, etc.).
Jan. 1973 - June 1973 Area:
Seattle, Washington Position:
Quality Assurance System Analyst Responsibilities:
Lead, work with, check and coordinate the activities of other employees assigned to plan, develop and document the procedures required to organize and control the Quality Assurance Systems which included:
1.
Maintain status of work assigned to the group.
2.
AU.ist u na c;emen t in the resolution of decisions and dif ferences that may arise.
3.
Ini tia te and revise departmental opera. ting directives ar.d procedures.
4 Coordinate problems with other organizations and Customer Personnel.
5.
Write letters, reunrts, memo's and directives for management approval.
lI
=
=
6.
Suggest iTprovements in methods of departmental operation.
7.
Investigate and prepare reports en trouble items.
8.
Develop audit scnedules, perform compliance and hardware audits to b
I assure system and equipment are maintained in accordance with company and customer requirements.
I 9.
Assure employee certification in critical processes is obtained and maintained (i.e., soldering, dye penetrant, connector molding, etc.).
Nov. 1972 - Dec. 19!3 Area:
Cocing Comnany Source Surveillance Representative at Lockheed Propulsion Company, Redlands, Cali fornia Responsibilities:
Monitored the fabrication of the SRAM rocket motor for I
assurance it was being built to the requirements of the specifications and Engineering drawing.
Was also responsible for auditing the suppliers Quality Assurance Sys tem (i.e., Receiving Inspection, Quality pecords, cal / cert,etc.)
I for assurance it was being maintained to the requirements of MIL-Q-9858A.
Jan. 1966 - Oct. 1973 Area:
Cape Kennecj, Fla.
Position:
Quality Assurance system Analyst Responsibilities:
Same as Jan. 1973.
I June 1964 - Dec. 1965 Area:
Cape Kennedy, Fla.
Position:
Facilities Schedule Coordinator Responsibilities:
Maintain schedule control of all work acccmplished in the plant maintenance shops which included:
1.
Review and schedule all work requirements for the electrical, carpenter, paint and maintenance shops.
I 2.
Initiate the request and coordinate with the naterial buyers for all equipnent and materials required to accomplish v.ork and maintenance of equipment.
3.
Prepare reports for management on labor expenditures.
I I
..i.
July 1960 - June !?64 I
Area:
Cape Kennedy, Fla.
i Position:
Quality Assurance Planner Responsibilities:
Reviewed Manufacturing installation planning for assurance I
that engineering requirements were incorporated and insert required Quality Assurance Inspection points.
Sept. 1958 - July 1960 Area:
Chattanooga, Tenn.
Employer:
Combustion Engineering g
Posi ti on :
Worked in shop as a mechanics helper doing miscellaneous shop fuTctions g
and minor welding.
Also completed military service active duty obligation during this time period.
' I I
I I
I I
I I
9 I
I I
..3...
_y I
I i
r.:
a '-
w.,,~
i:
.i
-"a i jj igil.
I ':
l 3, *:
(
llis E3
[
i-l;> >
l.
i;jiji
! l'
- l. I,
- ji ci e
I 1-
- il!
y
$1!.!!
-E.
p l
,.1.i'.t.!..
3 I i !?i?:
'\\'
i
!!!!!I
.r
- y
- .::
1 1.-
l l
).
.I!!Ill!
u l
- rin!
t ]
i n-E ;
ijil E5 1
p g
gl!
lIil i
11 i
I I!
I!
l!ll i
l
!i l
P L ;
I
'i!!
l1 i
i-i
,=
i lli E
1 I E
i 11 i
i n
i
' [i, l
.1 n-i i
I.I
.l I!
~
el
" r-
- F--
3,.
i
- iii, I
l
-,i
-gli an iI I
l I
I
.l.
- l. i.
1
_!i l I. I u
p!
T_.it:
- dii, l 8' L-g[
F-lill.i i
-l; i f:
I M
'r
!i illl!
ij
, mn 1-
mousron uc*lrasc a K:7.sacomm ev
" " ^ '"'
"* * "o '
EMETH TEXA8 PfMCT resocessig avuswu.
PBQP-49 1
P90.TES SITE WIALITY Pers ym1mr T*'
11.
suasect mars mouse N NFIN 1-23-81
, _ 1.. _ id 1.,f _ i implementation review =h=11 request and include with the char +11at, as part of the enlantion, copies or er.
W etc., stkich are=====tial to the t
couple + - of the rwriew.
The individual performing the implementation review a.
shall keep the EER responsible per=aaa*1 and the Discipline Supervisor informed of the status and progress.
f.
h am 2 tan listed on the checklist cas not be cesgleted, the specific reason (s) Justifying the
~
amission is to be recorded in the coments section of the a u 19=t.
4 6.k.3 Dericiencies l
Ia the erect that a deficiency is det.ected it shall be brought to the attention of tJn B&R per====*1 dirwetly responsible fbr the activity affected.
6.k.3 1 Based ce the potectial criticality-establish if a sts work condition exists per PSQP-AT, and take the indicated actico if appiir=ble. When the deficiency appears to be reporemble per 10CFR50 55e inform the as. A te Discipline Project QA Suparrisor who will take action as
' 1 defined im STP-PEP-11.
i 6.k.3 2 The deficiency is next esalanted to determine if a Bonconformace Report (BCR) per ST-QLP 15.1 and/or a Corrective Action Bequest (CAR) per ST-QAP 16.1 small be ialtiated.
E 6.A.3 3 The eforsmace Deport and/or Corrective Action i g Begeest shall be generated W B&R or EL&P. When g
an E:2 is generated by IL&P relating to a
- j potential reportable item, the initiator will f
eamplete the ancessary informatica including the ptent i a lly regable block and submait the. BC2 to
- I the PQAS.
j
_....... _.,_,_. m..,
.,.= ~,...=.
,...,, m..,.__....
..... _.........,... ~...
I
g > w + me e e W a:C N I
=
VQ 00 h
b) h, M
\\
t a
i
.2 i
- y 2
cc M
o e
00 3 0 (1
L?* d O
cy i i
N a
g
$ h,
q,'
Q 5
' 5 (4
s C*
?
d A o s-I c'
3 d /n -y e
3 g
=
a I
___.J
~
mm I
-tap and 88 g
T z
-[,
E o
9 7
h
.M Y
<t c:
a e
}x e,-
p so x
e s
2
(\\
8 i
7 q
I, O tv
,7 j
f
(,p
,3 Q
7 Y
N i
a t
o i
a >
.E I-o s
.b.c o.
4 6
0-m C
2O 4 <
MJ /
N.
l
<C s<j.1
~
2k k g
- 4
- z. o-jq 2
,1 ~2 2
,a p.
2 2
m z.
2 o
c 3
4 e
cg 3
l
?
{= >w m
%e-6,
$.a ?
E T,4 N,
A,
[ ca y T 4
n o
w A
t f
s'
~7
=
~
O (
h
(
J-
\\E h
O I
I I-z
-s J f
.s C
y-u-
=
c i ;
e C
4
,3 3
i g
s z o 2
e o
O L.
E--
-A7 4 4 4
d 8
d O W
j
(
l p.
.r1 0-o O
q A-9 u:
oe o
i O
54
{d< <
N 46 U j t.
O d o d
2 4
v J
f 4;g#
'z l l
f z
c
=
y c ;, rg 6' n
y 7
c ro a b
t u
gg g
t 5 t m
8d 7. f,o 3
E h
E o
-s
=a c
n ~
s: 5 0 0 e*
'n d
e ev e
?
f.
L T
o e
p f
- g
%5 J-n 8
I y
J T I
'i*
I T
7 8
i j
0 ci oc
=y get m
3 5
m
_9 d
o o
O b
l k
,l, I
J-5 0
=
a a c=c s
c 1
+
~
w d
d O
O T N 'd t
8 i
i C
s
]
H y
y 4
> V P J
~
I
-b.o 5
f, t
f A,
s y
v u
w o
(
- s y 9.;
- ,
4 g
6 s
0 a
I o
4 4
v d
fc1
)
3
,1
(
i
)
w e
4 th v
o' 9
(g(
e I
=
=
w a
p, r o
s o
=
= h-V
?
r/ S G9 g
c.t s
b T V c)
J n
y C
v 0
2 j
v3
$ 5~
H E
.i 4 -q
)
4 W
?
5 5
d w d sd 6
I s
e.
2 n-i a
c: Gc:l
'm g
I e
A'3 g
J'$ ^
l' j
1 I,.
e
+ v i
+
A
/
t) 4
'j\\
v' Q
fjd
}
j A
w A
V$ d V
f
_.s Q JJ s
A C
' ' J : }LI r
2' y
_9 y -5 5
Y7 O
.~.
]
j
's o
8 u
J i
V 5<E
. h V.
b
$ {" ?
N
= N' 4
o i
5 3
0 $s:
et J 4
.a o
o :" 9 '._.,'
{
3 3
ev#3 3
3 32 a3 e
5 sc u o!
u.
c es
~
=
,,m.
4 m
=
5 hh hi
$k'$
h h Vi h
N M bbb
1 I
e l
~
I f, ~.
CC A
i I
r 2
.a v
s I
=
g
~
o
\\
w N
h J
5 5
?
'e
{
T Y
'Z-tr y
I a
m T
u-y s
6 O )
& D
'A o
E f
3x 7
3 i O
J q
c i
i J J a
a l
G
=
2 I
\\
\\
5 t
)
k k
k d
7 e
u v
n u f
n 6
2 d
v j
4 0
o I
=
3 j
+
2 2'
2 2-2 2
o 2
I 1
U I_
n v
o s
e r
r r
r r
i a
A 3
=
S p
a J
i y
1 n
n a
I 3u y
1
+
4 l
3 t
e g
.5 4
b Y
4 d
3
(
t g
9 o
9 R
z o 2
y C 6 E-
-x 0
y d'
W 6
g 1
no l'
u:
oc z
z
,s.
/n y
Y g
o c
o g.
4 a
F E
b 4
't$
Z n'
v U
t L
U wy
_< (
r e
o _
v
=0 o
?
Au r
I 2 ;4 Y
r y
Y x
n ~
v
.x e s s
+
y g7 5 J Iy s
le J
I~
$0 i
Po l
6 13 4
}
K g
s s
s y
oc a f. -
s s
s a
?
P P
T
?
d t
44"9 i
I S
3 0
- i r
e i:
'E T
r'
'a ;
=
uu
.s a
e a
y
+
A 7
1 1
d I
l 0
l b.
e 4
4 t
4 2
+
e a
e 2
4 E
D D
(
w e.
S w
w s
t u
o Q
3 3
)
2e 5 4.
G d
o 2
6 C
C o
l 5 9" d
s5 3
J 6
3 J
d i
J
~
e
[
i i
ti.
,f 5
i i
t i
3 I
3 / J c? e2 so 'T 7
c 1
i 7
?
y-q +t,
)
e 4
a t
e
c s
s 1
m r
_a y
e e
s e
G "T
h '^ 5 Y
A y
n 0
4 4
.c g
'k h
4
- 1. -
a
't
(
~
s,a -pa 3 1
x
.]
1 3
z 1
2 a
s
~
s
- d 'bp h,i v y
g n
9 W
E 6
A p
b TI k
[
f d
i' S
j s
4 4 h6 5'
<p g
g A
5 r
F k'
i i
4
= z pos r
o n
e m o
.-