ML20039G254
| ML20039G254 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png |
| Issue date: | 01/05/1982 |
| From: | Steptoe P CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.), ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE |
| To: | Semmel BIER, MILLS, CHRISTA-MARIA, ET AL |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8201150427 | |
| Download: ML20039G254 (2) | |
Text
-
S W,
/g g,
RECEf7ED
/ $-
ISHAM, LINCOLN & BEALE d4N131984{Q COUNSELORS AT LAW 3
ON E ra n 57 N ATION AL PL A2 A Fontv-5ECOND FLOOR JN CMiCAGO,8LLINos5 60603 TELEPHONE 3'2 558 7500 TELEX 2 5288 y 81
-3 x
mu D.'gy]l
~)
g
,,,,{3,",'"'"*
January 5, 1982
"*"70,IE3.'8*
Lad 7
O UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of
)
)
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
)
Docket No. 50-1550LA
)
(Spent Fuel Pool (Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant))
Expansion)
Dear Mr. Sennel:
This letter is to update Consumers Power Company's responses to your clients' Interrogatories 1-5 (Set I),
pursuant to 10 CFR S2.740 (e) (1).
The individuals identified in those responses are still the expert witnesses Consumers Power Company intends to call at any evidentiary hearing in this case, except as follows:
Christa-Maria Contention 2 and O'Neill Contention II-A CPCo does not presently intend to call Ron Voll to testify in respect of these contentions.
O'Neill Contention II-B Tom Bordine is expected to be the expert witness in respect of this contention.
O'Neill Contention II-C Tom Bordine is expected to be the expert witness for this contention.
O'Neill Contention II-E-4 Roger Sinderman is expected to be the expert witness for this contention.
1 1Ob 1
9 l
68 i i
8201150427 820105 PDR ADOCK 05000155 G
PDR t
Page Two O'Neill Contention II-G Ed Raciborski, Pat Donnelly, and Dave Blanchard are expected to be tha expert witnesses in respect of this contention.
Board Question No. 1 Tom Bordine is expected to be the expert witness for this contention.
The subject matter as to which of these witnesues are expected to testify, and the substance of their testimony, is clear from the motions for summary disposition and written testimony which have already been filed in this case.
If any substantial changes or additions are required to this list of expert witnesses or their testimony as a result of Licensing Board rulings on proposed contentions and on the pending motions for summary disposition, we will again update our responses in accordance with 10 CFR S2.740(e).
Sincqrel,
I.
Y 111p t p oe PPS/kb CC:
Service List l
--