ML20039G207
| ML20039G207 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1982 |
| From: | Fisher G U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 81-1131, NUDOCS 8201150384 | |
| Download: ML20039G207 (2) | |
Text
-
c y-000172Tl'U:st a gROD, ti UTIL Ff,C. [J.h,b.,w et w.
watrea Sr<m,ees @mtn at appens g
g FOR.THE DlhTRICT OF Col.UMBI A CIRCULT
~
pudito dI tember Term,'19~81 No. 81-nn 5
PEOPLE AGAINST NUCLEAR ENERGY, Petici d $! albs court Of4ppW389 i
RECElVI,.D
[
, g3, p. tri:t cf C
=2 cir:u:t s
y,,
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COM[IhSIO@N1'31
' y"
g n
y,
~
3 l
' 8 METROPOLITAN EDISOS COMPANY, et al. \\
(PUBLIC UTILITIES), Intervenors e
g.
ORGE A. FISHER y
Ct.ERK Petition for Review of an Order of. the-United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Before: WRIGHT, Circuit Judge, McGOWAN, Senior Circuit Judge,' and WILKEY, Circuit '
. Judge.
- JUDCMENT This cause ca=e on to be heard on a petition for review of an order' of the United' States Nuclear Regulatory Co= mission and was briefed and argued by counsel.
On ' consideration thereof, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this ' court that the. order' of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under review in this cause is hereby vacated. :,
It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that the Co==ission shall prepare cn environmental assessment regarding the effects of the proposed restart of the nuclear facility at Three Mile Island Unit One (TMI-1) on the psychological health of neighbor-ing residents and on the well-being of the surrounding co=munities.
The Commission
'shall then determine, on the' basis of this environmental assessment, whether the Nation-.
, al Environmental Policy Act requires pr'Eparation of a full environmental impact state.
ernt.
It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that, until the Co==ission has complied with the requirements of the National Environmental Pol' icy Act as described
.in the preceding paragraph, it shall not make a decision to. restart TMI-1.
It is FURTHER ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this court that theCommissionshallpreparh a' statement of' the reasons for its determination that psychological health is. not cog-~
i nizabic under the Atomic Energy Act.
opinions to follow.
C I. E.' '
Per Curism For tha_ Court
'82 J.V112 P4 56 b9 CM
' }' !
Georg& A. Fisher ULO_.
Clerk
- 5 Circuit Judge'WILKEY dissents.
Whether designedly so or not, this order will bari tha resumption of f.urnishing nuclearjouer from T11I-1, at which there has never been an accident,, until such time as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission satisfies this coisrt, first by an " environmental assessment," and then, mest likely, later by a required
" full environmental impact statement," as to its consideration of certain new environ-r.cntal factors.
This delay is imposed because of the. asserted impact "on the psycho-0 g 50 s 0Il 8201150384 820107 PDR ADOCK 05000289 G
PDR l
.6 r
7,/ 1;3, di-1131 - People Against Nuclear Energy v. USNRC 2
7.
l j
i legical health of neighboring residents," an "i= pact" which has never before been-considered as covered by the National Environ = ental Policy Act.
This is yet another exa=ple of a court inventing new procedural require =ents for an administrative agency in a manner which has enor=ous substantive consequences.
See Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v.' NRDC, 435 U.S. 519 (1978).
The court is concerned that "the vell-being of. the surrounding ce== unities" be assessed, yet while this is taking place, for the co=nunities near DfI-l it will be a colder vinter than predicted..
~
- y.
.'.t-
)
i:
~
s e
t s
4 a
i
~..
t i
j t
i
- I I
j
~
f i.;
i l
)'
I s
s y
1 1
i
~
mm 8