ML20039F668

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
QA Program Insp Rept 99900519/81-04 on 811102-05.No Noncompliance Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Design Verification & Actions on Incorrect Beam Sizes for Electrical Trays & Pipe Whip Restraint Design Discrepancies
ML20039F668
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/04/1981
From: Costello J, Hale C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20039F659 List:
References
REF-QA-99900519 NUDOCS 8201130203
Download: ML20039F668 (12)


Text

.

ORGANIZATION: BECHTEL PCWER CORPORATION GAITHERSBURG POWER DIVISION GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND REPORT NO.: 99900519{81-04 INSPECTION DATE(S): 11/2-5/81 llNSPECT10N ON-SITE HOURS: 28 CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESS:

Bechtel Power Corporation Gaithersburg Power Division ATTN: Mr. J. M. Komes, Vice President and General Manager 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, MD 20760 ORGAN!ZATION CONTACT:

Mr. D. C. Kansal, QA Manager TELEPHONE:

(301) 258-3776 PRINCIPAL PRODUCT:

Architect Engineering Services NUCLEAR INDUSTRY ACTIVIW: The Gaithersburg Power Division has a total of 2767 em-ployees of which 2248 or 81% are assigned to nuclear projects. Major projects in-clude Callaway Units 1 and 2, Wolf Creek Unit 1, and Grand Gulf Units 1 and 2.

There are also modification / repair / service contracts on 14 additional reactor units.

,1 s

ASSIGNED INSPECTOR:

V

[k N

J. R. Qsjelld, React 6/ Systems Section (RSS)

Date OTHER INSPECTOR (S):

APPROVED BY:

'l (7

h

[

C. J. H Q d, Chief, RSS Date INSPECTION BASES AND SCOPE:

A.

BASES:

10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B; SNUPPS PSAR, Chapter 17; and Grand Gulf PSAR, Chapter 17.

B.

SCOPE:

Design input, design verification, and action on two regional requests:

(1) incorrect beam sizes for electrical trays, Grand Gulf; and (2) pipe whip restraint design discrepancies, SNUPPS.

I)ESIG"ATED ORIGN,_7 comnean h g Q -)LitZ i -

8201130203 811208 PDR GA999 EECBECH 99900519 PDR J

BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION GATTHERSBURG POWER DIVISION ORGANIZATION:

GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND REPORT NO.: 99900519/81-04 INSPECTION RESULTS:

PAGE 2 of 3 A.

VIOLATIONS:

None B.

NONCONFORMANCES:

None C.

UNRESOLVED ITEMS:

None D.

OTHER FINDINGS OR COMMENTS:

1.

Design Input and Design Verification - SNUPPS PSAR Chapter 17, Grand Gulf PSAR Chapter 17, Engineering Department and Engineering Project Procedures were examined to determine quality assurance program commitments. To verify implementation of these commitments, the following documents were examined:

3 design criteria documents,13 drawings, 3 system descriptions, 14 calculations,1 project summary "Q" list,1 design review notice, 2 design control check lists,1 licensing commitment tracking system, and 6 specifications.

Relative to the documents examined, all procedural commit-ments were being properly implemented.

2.

Construction Deficiency Report - Incorrect Beam Sizes for Electrical Trays.

Mississippi Power and Light Company (Grand Gulf) reported to Region II that an Architect Engineering (AE) reevaluation had determined that incorrect beam sizes for electrical seismic Class I tray supports were purchased and installed at 76 tray locations.

The purpose of this inspection was to determine if this was a generic problem and if there was a breakdown in the AE's quality program.

Examination of drawing C-1415A, Revision 18, "Auxi-liary Building Electrical Tray Supports Typical Standard Details," showed that the drawing had correctly stated the requirements.

The error was made when Bechtel construction site personnel incorrectly translated the require-ments from drawing C-1415A to their fabrication requests.

The site personnel discovered the error and took appropriate corrective and preventive action.

Since Grand Gulf is the only Gaithersburg Power Division (GPD) construction project, this item has no further generic potential at GPD. Management Corrective Action Request (MCAR 35) was issued August 20, 1981, to alert other Bechtel power divisions of a similar potential problem.

The error appears to have been the fault of one individual onsite that failed to l

consider a necessary note on the design drawing (C-1415A).

No further action at GPD appears warranted.

3.

Pipe Whip Restraint Design Deficiencies.

The purpose of this inspection was to determineif there had been a break-down in the Bechtel GPD design process.

BECHTEL POWER CORPORAT10N

, ORGANIZATION: GAITHERSBURG POWER DIVISION GAITHERSBURG, MARYLAND R N NO.:

99900519/81-04 INSPECTION RESULTS:

PAGE 3 of 3 During an inte nal design review by Bechtel GPD of the SNUPPS " Design Guide for Pipe Whip Restraints," a discrepancy was identified between this Design Guide and Bechtel's BN-TOP-2, " Design for Pipe Break Effects."

The discrepancy involved the absence in the Design Guide of the require-ment for an energy balance analysis in the design of pipe whip restraints in those cases where the formation of a plastic moment in the pipe could not be prevented.

This discrepancy was reported as a 10 CFR 50.55(e) item by SNUPPS to Regions III and IV.

A method had been developed by SNUPPS project engineering personnel which was considered superior for those cases where a plastic hinge is developed.

During the internal Bechtel design review, the consensus was that this method was not conservative enough, was in violation of BN-TOP-2, and did not provide for the increase of size of the energy absorbing material or the U-bolt diameter of the Pipe Whip Restraints (increase in size was caused by rounding off dimensions for commercial procurement).

The method developed by SNUPPS project engineering personnel had several unquantified conservatisms which, if evaluated, may have shown the re-straints were adequate.

However, such an analysis was not performed, instead -103 of the 242 restraints issued for construction were reanalyzed using the energy balance technique, and/or the lumped-mass dynamic model, and 44 restraints were revised.

Both the FSAR and the Design Guide were revised to allow for the formation of plastic hinges within acceptable ductility ratios in pipe whip restraints and to permit the use of dynamic analysis in pipe whip restraint design as an alternate to the energy balance technique.

No nonconformances or unresolved items were identified in this area of the inspection.

1 m

O I.

b' n

o 9 O

q 5-

".O Q

ca D E

.O m

o 2 4 5

M O

=c a u C.

$$6 T

h k

g c c CL d

D

  • 'n P

N 6 I

== o uB5%

i.

~

ua uum (A L

-oow Moo C

D S

o c f3 b'

h b

b t

Q 4%%o Q cc Cn w-q T'

d N,

N

% d D

D coo-e..

g e

e,

+

o Q

'N.N,

.. o its A

N o

s ca es e b' )'.' s%

n g

s' N-Q' 9'

s o

meau>

M emwem A

q 4

g O

g m b C1 CC I

I "o

,T UmNM4

=

s k

N 3

I 5

z c

t m

w s

L N

s s'

V

-2 d

(

s.

u n

5 N

t k

4 5

2 5

t s

q

{

u 2.

4 I

Q

[

d I.

t, O

g w

s P

k 2

e4 1

q 1

s. -;..t e

%d Y;

  • )

{

U C

9 1

5

=

5 T(

c b

3'

't r

s

-s s

y s

em e

.e 5

o o

w M

0 g

4 5

g 4

V i,

4 H

g

=.-.

t U

m e

w O

4 M

kJ A

g 7

C g

A I

}

2, m,

C W

E I

b w

1 m

4 w

I s

s

.$ d Y

N D

h N

O 4

d i

l d

2 T

w k "w a

y

[

W 2

N.N d

(

C f

e t,..

i v b,

L 2

r 2'

9

(

4 e

y'

{

w y

4%

t

~ v& v! w*gdd M

gg a

G Q' d.

5 as

+

e 1

O o d

% [4 0

s C

2 y'('o.,

b 4'

.2 l e O

V

's,

+

c

+

9 p.

4

-.=

y.

z

'aiG 9 h I

s 2

{

t t

.? 2 1

E d" 9

0 0

O D

U s_ o Z,

s as e g

1

~

s 2$

a 1

I L

9 d

b

"'y q

=

a 7-6, y W

W D

V, g

i 2

2 o

o, t

e

=

'")

m y

E s

M p

vs v m

$ "E g

  • i, b'
  • =

.E4 m' 4

2 4

-M

(

M "1

ou u

~

m s

s a

r h) 9 9

9 u c; u c3 8

ba L u u.c s%

4 o

s e c; a I

C t::

3 T'q I

A

-.J O I

j y

}

.I 0

o,,

A, 0-Q

'u i

v3 C

4 4

e w

y y

W

  • WNC s

g d

A W

M d

A A

A A

E w

a,-

.o M

W g

t/)

M W

mWe I

.2 %

h D)*e-3s N

N 19 q q r e- = c S

k

- *- os e a

M3OuE a

C m q) o

%J W L CL L ett 3

ECMAC k,,

e

% e o c5 ci v N

m g

g A

CL ett U

C U

M

Dodat No.gogm Insp:cter J. R. Cos /e//,

Report Ho. p g Sccpe/ Module Desi., r,,p,1/h p @;/,c,/;o*

DOCUMENTS EXAMINED

.~

4 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

iI 8

Geeler 17 Gr d Cs > f hl,,,1,.

AI.):u i On 1, oa J, - o u.I:ta f/2. /,,

I Assor cr i2 B

C,1 cold;-a oIE12Gasc Rn1 J,I. AI.. n c. o r P,nr su n, < 4, e en :v,1 3l14/co B

ln v f S' e W,. M -/3 4 7 5 13 8

C lul lina Dif 12 Gor c Ris Jal, No. 9 6 4 f - P,pa saonars re;.: red 4l26/96 5

[a v

[Sb Fla. M.13 49F I4-R ralculatioa

1. 3.1. D L, l, da. 9 6 4r - del fas 4 ve Sa r t :,s Mr.1 8/11l20 D

(4 /r s lal ;m a r LP e t P./u je 17 8

t'. fi s l F;, a

1. _c. _c A. o JA N, 9 6 4c-SF,. ) L a L ;,.. :) ru t es t 1/z r*/7, A

i n

Pu n. D u c t, a r.,

% c a v re 16 8

/~ leul lism C 14 c o 3. 4 Joh No. 86 4r-Sa ts.s:e Aa. t s, - of 3/trl7, n

y Aus lt. <y B.r:I A :na li 8

C. ),,,1 4 :e s C - G o 91.. Jo b rJa. 9c 4r-Cn.<fatnesm+

I4ea d i:.L 4/Ital7s 1

61, / 4 : o r <

18 8

Calculat:as 90,.ls l. Na. 9 4 4 r Volla g,

Den,n G I, al.1:

11131}13 O

HPts Se<vice uhn fa.- Pan,n Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Number 2.

Specification 6,

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Docunent 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

Docket flo.3990dfis Inspectcr J. R. G r+e lla

( Scope /Medule Desip L,. /,/ pe,;7 t',,; //c. /t."

DOCUMEllTS ' EXAMIflED 1

2 T_ITLE/ SUBJECT 3

4 le T

Gic u la l;.e ir-o, Jo l, No 9 6 +r -- CJle h ac;1, G I, al, s tos 7/t/ ro 4

L L.

P;.: n Tu,, + a:e Lpes P.,.>. Daau-ry_. C./3 0171 19 2n

__ I Du M -!3 To A.

t

.i r

4,,

(TM T Auv_ Bld K truir U :1 I JA Ha 4G 4r n

3

)3 n,/An

. 1 11 1

D ra C'- lo o n V,,,* l.

6-Q_ ;a m l f;ui l Gi vs el d <-I G,aeva l A<<

..-eat Pt..,

1

<-,_ t :.

lL H

<; t e.s -

J2

'l D<a.

C-Idi 3 U+;l I Cnaldn.wral Re : n fa r e.,. - r;I:-)ra w'a n 3in}1, 1.3 Seello A _t L

Da +Als JaL Aln 94 4r 23' 8

Oul*4 Asso nnee Prea rm Projeel Som a vu

/D. Lis i

]el 6Ldf

_)

TJ l]

3 14

.2 Cle A real De s:a a Gn + < I cke e l<

L;14 (oce t\\ J o b 9 4 4 r-4//r/74 9

~

2r i

E-1541 Paesel L,a :e D; u e-n Esf niv I t) :F i

1. L 9e W 2/3/72 3

<pw N.. __4i d s - E - A l f. a 49 0 - 4 I+ Mola r G n d v.I Cemie<<

folt3l7?

II 2&

2

$,n a e _ da 94 K-r - ffs. n ; fo rn ; sl<

st n ) Go F l.im a r Plala And siirlLt_

1 ~1 1

A te e s s n r:a s fa <

G t a t..-r a i Devwart J _cno arisi.

L1 22 1

M th 9 L 41~ - M - n 9 4.0 1-I s e:1ca t I Ce.,le:to..I Pa.

wr fe F.*1Ti)

L/14/ fo 14-19 e

ttees,; a G

I n,.s sak
.

<a t ~

Joh 9t4r bh /ri

/4 30 2

goe, d, 9 6 4 C - E - o s s, n _ r,n },;

,N) g i r u,1,,,, tj e,1,;, I a/24 /ga jz Pen edu + ;u A s s el,61;as I

Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Number 2.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Docunent 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

Dockst flo. 99900513 Inspect r J. R. C,s # e //"

Report lio. ri-o4 Scope / Module Des;4n L,pg/,/ Des:y,, Ve<!Itc,ft,"

^

DOCUMENTS EXAHlilED 4

1 2

TITLE / SUBJECT 3

38 2.

Nyee, r),

gf. 4 g~. E. 6 91. p, lied, aly,,,, ;,

A,, )

g,. ;,, :,

os 1:t:r 2:s.,

9l24l74 0

di clas s iE flee}<:, l Ea s : u,,,,1 7"I, e dec o m e.,4 s 11,4,2 bel w co < /, :-

),

IL, fa oo m ?,Arrt J.L I o 4 4,L 32 8

g) a n ),,,1 pf, J psA R Clu a le e 13.n, ferFlan 17A.n - Berl).I Oa,1lL 9.lfb i

i A s s a <n,e P<,3,,, -

f,,

H., e),, e P-r e Pinh 33 3

EDPt 4 34 -o f,

off. Proj ]

Des :-.,

Rev:,w (Des u f,,L 1 ll15'l7 9 4-A cl. n k Lin r And Desan 2evie w Waltra )

34 3

EDPr

4. _t 1 - o s, De s :- -

C le,,lal;

,,s

//9/s1 8

3 s' 3

EDPT

4. 41 - el,

Base De s:g-D o e n,,,,,,4 Ra v:<.s, Aene,<.1, A d r/8/78 1

Re lea u Ra ;., :<,,als 36 3

2Dr>r 4 4t,-oI, Praj a e +

Gu :.,a,a <:.,3 D r,w:,,,1 11]tsl80 1&

39 3

2OPr 4.49 - o s; Penj,,1 h a c: f; <,1 ;,,, <

9lrs/tEj_.

II 36 i

M - o 1 A L e t ( O) ?lcl.,,

1.

E n s t ys,.,,,, [,,4:,,,

D:,

a,-

Ave:1:a<v Ch4/81 8

J J

feed waf e r 'fyst,%

Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Ntsnber 2.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

Docket Ifo.99900S*19 Inspect r J. R. Cesfalla Scope /Hodule Des g., T.,,J /a.s;;,. Ver;;;cJ:.*

DOCUMEliTS EXAHlifED 1

2 TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 39 I

M-0l A L 6 I (0)

Sp Ian Flo w Diaya a Asi liar, S,1 - irs splen i1/tr/1, D

4n I

M- 0 3 A L oi, fo) Pip;,,3 A a;l:.<; fe r d w. I,< pu,;.

s.,, s:.,.

9h,le 7

rs.,, Jai,

?; p ;,, a M-o3 AL o 2(C) P;cing Ts o m e t ric Mo i, <

Dr:ve.,

Au s. Fred. ler 3htl81 8

4I i

Pomp ' A " D:s an,ary P:e:,,,

~ A2 i

M - 03 AL 03 fo)

P;p;m a r, a, + <ic M,1, < D<irca An.

r,, J... ), e 9/o/81 Pu o'B" Dis e t,a ra, P;p;,3 43 1

M-o3ALo4(el P;o in a, r<,m Frie To<L.

D <;<a.,

Aoi. F <d w. 4,<

9/r /81 Pu a,.

D;1cha<y P;. ;., a 44-I M-o3ALncfC)

Pr oln a

[s.-

J ete Aus;}iary

    • rad m 4er Po -o _,

3lI3/8 7

Re < :<c 1.I:..,

^?;nin.

S pr-Iths),,

3 H

B

'M - o o A L f o) f,<+an nr, c a :. s ;.

Aux Ilary Fa el w.L.c y

46 B

Calc. hl,, AL-ia Avn.r% m fa,J a le, p.

NpsH 7/11), 7

_A a

S o, g :,,, Pra, r a re 7,hB19, A

+3 8

Calc. th. A L-i, Avs. fa,2 w.1,,

Poa,a 48 8

Cale.

H..

AL-In Ava. Feedva lar S s te s Sort;,,, Preseore 7hs I,,

A y

49 8

Cale. Als. A L-10 To l.1 Fla. )

F-r rar b; e D v:v e.,

As : I:. ~

>}n h 1 A

Feed w.)<<

Pu,p Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Perchas Order 1.

Sequential item Number 2.

Specifica tion 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Doctanent 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

Docket No. 999005~19 Inspectcr J, R. Ces felle Scepe/ Module _pe,;;,

re,,,# /a,,:-

Wrificat,"

DOCUMENTS EXAMINED

~

1 2

TITLE / SUBJECT 3

4 5'O 8

Cale. de. AL-2i Total Hea d fee Molar Dr;ven Au:1:a ry Ths}12.

A

>aei n la<

h-p

^

St B

Cair. sla. AL-21 Aus liary Fer Lu k Splaa - Flo w Dian,a. -

1,l1B,l17 A

D.J-52 8

Desi Rev;ea Ad:a e o o+cs -M-o 2 At or Ava ;I;,3 reaJw I,<

n/> s /,r gn f s ten PLrD y

fo r A.is;l:aq Feedwatar C,/zt,/ft SR 2

_t o K & -M - o 1.r fo)

Des:3, 5, nee tC:cali.a 13 Pun,a s Aa) % L:,,

na: san C r; ira:-

va r

&li1/ 91 9

S4-E la de; & - e - o f o)

C;v:1 And Sirsc401 I Des 3 S+aalardotal de cle,a llal4 7-w ~ pl.d

%J an SC 8

Mee h a n e 1,l N r,rIr> <

De s :c, a Ca le.,1 che< L Lh4 Fa r The

$li l39 9

Sh mla a A : t, J

&u rl,

lin;J P-wer Plam4

[.o sfem K f.

R

! O 4 L f. - E - o fIecie;ral Des;y Cr: Je a:-

fo r 1La s/-ulardir a l 7lt/90

/0 doelea <

Un /

Powe<

Ple 4 Splen sw Document Types:

Columns:

1.

Drawing 5.

Purchas Order 1.

Sequential Item Number 2.

Specification 6.

Internal Memo 2.

Type of Document 3.

Procedure 7.

Letter 3.

Date of Document 4.

QA Manual 8.

Other (Specify-if necessary) 4.

Revision (If applicable)

mym 7,,~p" > v=r --

--- 7.

,=

r

,. (.

, g f

PERSON 5 CONTACTED ~r.'

tz (1

Dates' / /[2 -6 /8 /

S kompany" NeedJeh / ChD

~

Docket / Report NoI 999 0 0.//s /87 Inspector

'J. /2. Co c h/h -

/

Page t of 2 __

~~

~

p NAME(Please Print)

TIT 1.E(Please Print)

ORGANIiAT[0N[PleaseIr~IitT

)

. C. R,4 rJ5,+L.

Dn/isiers oA Mwa bret. Pwea. CcRP,

$_ $ $ w ra d 8?dAdh<wnc $mn

@ecbrn< ?oaiM' 0,en.

w.t

.n..

,,,,e

---..x-r T

M : L o.s.

PGG smpys Pusur Bee n c A a e um i

'R y. McCoA-t10t G k gap,yvin,,. css 4.+

u.

W W. WAA/ER

?G.E G PMb GuL F T M e e h st 9G.AtA -hv9s

'1.E. Meamum

%stou OE

+

(. E SO TcH.DO k!or G 42.- $(A/A05

^

f.-.&}ckepic Bee.7-ENcB G. G.

M

3. L.K6/mo

& Wuce %orre t

hu. /t. Gna%

T&,.67%w

+E 2

O *71/ T.*[4

{$f1 M0 Ps I

l1 } Y' MO t

e i

e

/f57[C-7 L Y d5t< W/ &&

l./.l4.BILoons co,=as w e MECH AAJ t C AL EN Cri A)6(f.rrd(,-

hne P,.oce Covoun=

P. 3. Kccuu saeav,3 og i

cas - 2.c i,

g,

  • y W guy $up ovropr y,ac

/K. It' Pi97et P/P& 'suPPGlR guP

_ ggggjzgi pogggp (opp m

u m Is m,cuup svev sig_

ae,u, w e er-r-u n

n 3g ia i.s swee az u r ce g..s n.

3kkSimomeo owLny aymeaa

'l

't 4

llcviut,e Oh' Law lco,oan-Au,onoy n.

0-kl. No cEs Susreuenraa Sox 7) w re

't k a DAsncx keLaw,Geelaw.

^

J.b.hard ME94%gsupmee l

- _J

, p', e.

_... g m ; --

.z

'T PERSONS CONTACTED 9

,7

'. iTu

h.. c f ',.".#:c; 7f Yzi, ~;l.}.4 hl' '.$eNh {el /hro '

J_

' T'

^

Dates'

!!l2 - 6)B i p

bocket/ Report No. S990d5~/9/8/-Of-Inspector ). R. (n N/h

~

Page~2 of

.2

~~

NAME(Please Print)

TIT 1.E(Please Print)

ORGANIZATION (Please Print)

W b.

Ssl UOb2EMc626 tid NP0C hhl%M av v-y UC,63L OCM fu bh GN tMus s d.

n a

T. R.Rosano.,

co-cuu s aca..ea u m w A

')l#tsA W fearpot.c Geoiie Eivsi<rs

~

1.

O e

l i

\\

t

(

n....

O. @ %,

M.;." -- P. ? ',, W :L !!" '.~

i' (K~ 2.?Ws%Wdsry&VV~.Q::::

B-1 W:

~

~ >.

-a

-u x e:

w..+~ dg : ;r-,

i+.

v. ui :.,c "t f

^ 4

?.

R;v. 3-12-75 ~

.,,,,s.. y '.W. I p. f,.f. g? J.

TW as

., #,3..

ATTENDANCE LIST COMPANY:

Bee A Fe/ / G PD DOCKET NO. 99900579

-....--....-..-..t

//,/f/6/

Date:

I l Pre-Inspection Conference Ibst Inspection Conference (Please TITLE (Please Print)

ORGANIZATION Print)

NAME (Please Print)

J. R. Cs.s 1 ell, Ren h r m oeco O s u re c %. t v

b. kU6parb b k 8 Nu rr(

h Tgcs

- nl d.~72iealsR

& oundtrica, 8 d 72L GC

  1. kloEdLEft Prhr.QA UR BaATE t.-SJ#PS D.c. KMsAL hvinmJ @%Ma w ra-

% L. H a(res ' NowrHerr Su.

eJ. W Zeo7A MS CHAF V/AD7V FAC.

/

T. M s'L 0.$

9. Q i. SssJ pp.s Ph. Tic [

B. K Xsdcs

. Mar 2,s.ra

'i o

4, I

1 i

-og.

-y y-e i==.e

--a-ww.-r$