ML20039E796

Package of Three Comments Requesting Shutdown of Facilities

ML20039E796
Person / Time
Site:	Indian Point
Issue date:	01/07/1982
From:	Barr L, Ed Miller, Moscara M AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:	NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
References
NUDOCS 8201110438
Download: ML20039E796 (4)

Text

._ _

1

$kk 'D0c:'ETi;UIt.;rr

' Paco,a UTIL FAc.f.?.'M.A26..

'82 'JfN -7 P3:24 i

572

)

om +: :z.:

DCCXfigt ER.'

l i

_Us.Qu.cfgaa__9uf

_ f % x h x2 a

K<m.A s s..

-W

-, hc a Ass 6

,0, KA.

\\o s.

_[

_al /A nudeas uddoy mod ofa-9_

_Jhu

~

c.e n _.x o : b u -

m Ab Jmt<k di xea.c.>daa.

fle-_Jrae' Aed -

&grJZ_AL_

-AL n-n

}

.am

&s-xn.ou _ u naf, suae fle fsei::nk h xa1-A,w e o x z' m a.c, j o _ p o L.-

J unstgesey mad nm

_.draus q.

yk_cf_As n

wn cp ~_4pa_

__aop 4 &s

-Io

+1u puisa.,.

._y w -_ t.dadea AaA a

n.L fIi w.o w Mii__

an9 rx.uuf ptopPe.

a.a.

&_ aaoloe

_anLx_ cuv_f o

o

%. caw.yuna.o_f_ -nva.wm%y

_6 wdt ba aaom_.

j)

.2s_n_.fl.so pso3

- p & R _J aak-yos a - p hi.k,-_

ij A n y.

1 8201110438 B20107 PDR ADOCK 05000247 H

PDR

p--.

'6-fhCD.a Cl![kh,Q(JJff,,

UEh Elaine Miller 151-14th S. tree Wooii-Hidge"J.NWlf 8231-7P3:24

. ~ 67075 4,

he Mr. Louis J. Carter O

1 3

U.S. Regulatory Commission 00Cwjg[M..

I<

4/

Atomic Safety and Li'censingo; Board 3 3

O/o T

[C i

Washington, D.C. 20555

.h Dear Chairmane To say I am appalled and disturbed on top of completely, y' Iost by the logie employed by our elected leaders and officials regarding the Indian Point Nuclear Reactors, is a gross under-statement among other inadequacies.

Now, by social standards, I am a middle-class, semi-intelligent, practitioner of higher learning, nee... college student. I do not claim to any keen insight or boundless wealth of knowledge and to be honest, I do not need either'in this in-stance!

The facts against these plants are so clear that it is an insult to the human race that they have been built let alone operated.

It soems that this country ~has reached the point where bureaucratic red-tape is placed above the health and welfare of people,-which is insanoiand. completely inhuman..

We sit in our homes today reading about and hearing how the President and his political " henchmen" are beating down the Soviets door to an arms limitation act concerning nuclear power.

When the chances of a nuclear attack reaching our shores are probably far less than one of our own nuclear power plants having a total core meltdown.

There seems to be as much danger "within" as the da~nger we were programmed to believe would come from "outside" foreign powers.

To vote to allow the Indian Point reactors to continue to l

operate is something you alone can be responsible for, for any 1

self-preserving human being can find no justice in your decision.

But the decision was made and as always the pros and cons will be argued far afterward, right or wrong.

It seems to me that the safety hearing to be held should be held at the earliest possible time. for they have already been delayed years longer than we could afford.

Ten percent of the U.S. population that live within the 60 mile radius of these reactors at Indian Point deserve this and much more since

~

there has been enough injustices performed already.

People were born with the will for self-preservation.

The government and elected officials are suppose to stand for and 3

secure that will above all..

That right seems to have been g50 infringed upon by the very government we stand for and by 5

Please let common sense and human welfare supersede any wrong that may have been done, any reactor that may have been built.

/ b Sincerely yours, Ybt

c ra.o. _ m T '.

p.ca,cui:t m!PRJ250-

~

rny-i

'82 Jia -7 P 3 :24 December 21, 1981 UW OUn nCE

~

CD2D"n A ?U-To The Nuclear U.egulatoiy;JCommission:

It has been brought to my attentio1. the seriousness of the Indian Point Uuclear Power Plants.

I live approximately 35 miles from these plants and feel it is my duty as "an ordinary citizen",

to speak my concern for this crucial issue.

I receat the deciclon made by the Commisc. ion "that Indian Point was safe eWigh to operate in the shortrun."

How safe is safe enough, and how long is the shortrun?

I hope that the investigative hearings will be more explicit in their investigations into the safety of the plants, then they were in their reasons for continuind operation of the plants.

I resent the fact that thece power plants were and are pernitted to onorate despite the fact that Indian Point has been declared as having inadequate plant design.

"The record of mismanagecent and un-ccheduled events proves that Indian Point is unsafe."

I recant the fact trat the plant continues to operate reguardless of the otatement made by Alfred DelBello, that"Energency Planning is unrealistic and not workable."

I do not believe a cafe evacuation is possible if there was a nuclear accident.

And I alco resent the fact that a plant could have been built in cuch a doncely populated area.

'lle are talking about 21 million people--1/10th of the U.S. population live within 60 miles of Indian "oint.

In the words of Robert Pyan, former LRC Dircctor of Ctate

Procronc,

...you've got 21 million people and that's crazy."

In summation I beg you to suspend operations at the plants pending the results of the hearings.

Indian Point is a death trap to-me and currounding citizens and it's about time we speak up and have our opinions hn xn.

I, g,--

s g;

y N'I

')

Sincerely E nda Parr li Pl

,W E02 ' Hemrodk Dride' c%dxcla V

g',

O 493?;... H, Nept une, -NJ-07753 L{

~,.. j,, -

,p.,.

l C

oso3

/D

.