ML20039E541

Forwards Supplemental Info Re SER Outstanding Issue 8, Equipment Dynamic Qualification,Updating 810515 & 28 Ltrs

ML20039E541
Person / Time
Site:	Shoreham File:Long Island Lighting Company icon.png
Issue date:	12/30/1981
From:	James Smith LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO.
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
SNRC-651, NUDOCS 8201110012
Download: ML20039E541 (25)

Text

N

.-f'

, I LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COM PANY f4d'O seawems SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION P.O. BOX 610, NORTH COUNTRY ROAD e WADING RIVER, N.Y.11792 December 30, 1981 SN 8 .

o' ,,

~"

' \I u

Mr. H. R. Denton, Director T_j JAN 'T1982% E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation '94 ga . . 7',

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  ?  ;-e _

I" i '

Washington, D.C. 20555 ;s O' a'

EQUIPMENT DYNAMIC QUALIFICATION-SUPPLEMENTAL INFOPMATION SER OUTSTANDING ISSUE NO. 8 SIIOREIIAM NUCLEAR POWER STATION - UNIT 1 DOCKET NO. 50-322

References:

LILCO letter SNRC-564 from Mr. J. P. Novarro to Mr. II . R. Denton, May 15, 1981 LILCO letter SNRC-575 from Mr. J. P. Novarro to Mr. H. R. Denton, May 28, 1981.

Enclosed are fifty-six copies of information which supplements that provided by the referenced letters. Four copies of this submittal are being forwarded directly to Dr. Morris Reich at Brookhaven National Laboratory, in accordance with Mr. R. L.

Tedesco's letter to LILCO dated January 28, 1981.

This information is provided in the two attachments describad below:

Attachment 1 Revision 1 dated November 20, 1981 to the "Requalification Plan for Shoreham Equipment."

go ol .t I/ l 8201110012 811230  !

PDR ADOCK 05000322 l E PDR i

I

.q'

• j SNRC- 6 51

. December 30, 1981 Page Two l

Attachment 2 Response to requests for additional information, as discussed in a telephone conference call among NRC, Brookhaven National Laboratory, LILCO, and Stone & Webster personnel on September 4, 1981.

These responses are also dated November 20, 1981.

Very truly yours,

- J. - L. Smith Manager, Special Projects Shoreham Nuclear Power Station JFE/pd Enclosures cc: J. liiggins Dr. Morris Reich-Brookhaven National Laboratory l

i t

1

. , , , . . , . ~ , , - - - , . - - , . . - . - - , - - . . . - . . ,

Attachment 1 Requalification Plan for Shoreham Equipment Revision 1, November 20, 1981 O

e e

s, .

. t Dockct 50-322 Shorgham Equipm:nt Raqualification Plan Dator November 20, 1981 Revison 1 Long Island Lighting Company Page 1 of 6 .

Equipment Mark Number Description -

Scope Schedule 1B21'FE002 Main Steam Flow Element Vendor Qualification By Analyaio 3/82 (N005) 1B21'RV-093 Vacuum Relief Valve - Test Program Undervsy to Address Valve 3/82 Drywell (SH1-175) Capability to Sustain Valve Cycling Lt. ads During LOCA Chugging 1B31*FE010 Recire. Flow Element Vendor Qaulification by Analysis 3/82 (N013) 1B31*MOV-032 Motor Operated Valve - Perform Deflection Analysis to Verify 12/81 (F031) Recire. Discharge Valve Can Be Closed While Being Subjected to Dynamic Loads. This Function is a New Requirement Resulting From Implementation of the LPCI Modification (Removal of Loop Section logic).

1C11*AOV-081 Air Operated Valve - Vendor Qualification To follow System

-082 Hydraulic Control Unit Change Decision (F010/F011) 1C11*RV-096 Relief Valve - Rydraulic Item Deleted Due to System Change (F012) Control Unit 1C11'SOV-044 Solenoid Valve-HCU Yendor Qualification To Follow -

(F009) System Change Decision 1C41'TK-150 Tank - SLC Ferform Dynamic Analysit Using Required. 10/81 (A003) Accumulation Response Spectra or Equivalent Dynamic Loads '

1D11'PNL-021 Radiation Monitors And Vendor Testing To Current NRC 3/82

-022 Panels (SH1-332) Criteria and Mark II Loads

-025

-026 -

-027

-061 '

-062

-067

-068

-069

-80 h

I

l Docket 50-322 SHOREHAM EQUIPMENT REQUALIFICATION PLAN DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1981 i Revision 1 LONG ISLAND LIGHTIFG COMPANY PAGE: 2 of 6 ,

EQUIPMENT MARE NUI!BER DESCRIPTION SCOPE SCHEDULE I 1Dll'Rh-027 Radiation Monitor- ^ Vendor Qualification By Dynamic Analysis 12/81

! ISO-Nozzle (SH1-332) 1 Ell *P-014 Pump And Motor - RHR Perform Dynamic Analysis of The Pump / Motor 3/82 (C002) Combination To Demonstrate Structural Adequacy and Operability To NRC SQRT Criteria 1 Ell'S-114 Strainer (SH1-148) Perform Dynamic Analysis To Mark II Loads G'

-139 and current NRC Criteria lE21* P-013 Pump and Motor - CS Same as for 1 Ell *P-014 (C002) 3/82 (C001) 1E21*S-05T Strainer (SH1-148) Perform Dynamic Analysis to Mark II Loads O And current NRC Criteria 1E32'HC-053 MSIV L23 HTR Vendor Retesting To MK II Loads and current 2/82 (B001) NRC Criteria 1E32*FT037 Flow Transmitter Perform Analysis To Demonstrate Pressure 12/81 (N053)

Boundary Integrity '

lE41'RDbggg Rupture Disc (SH1-340) Vendor Qualification by Burst Test. O Dynamic. Loads Are insignificant. '

1E41*S-055 Strainer (SRl-148) Perform Dynamic Analysis to Mark II Loads G And current NRC Criteria i 1E41'TU-002 Turbine - HPCI Perform Dynamic Qualification Test on a T/82 (C002) SLailar HPCI Turbine, to current NRC SQRT criteria, and Confira Adequacy of Shoreham Turbine by Similarity. Perform Analysis of Hydraulic Piping. 3/82 1E51*P015 RCIC PUMP Vendor Qualification By Dynamic Analysis 12/81 (C001)

C G signifies completion cf document review equipment inspection and compilation of summary and evaluation and SQRT Form.

Dockst 50-322 SHOREHAM EQUIPMENT REQUALIFICATION PLAN DATE: NOVEMBER 20, 1981 Revision 1 LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY PAGE: 3 of 6 .

EQUIPMEh:

MARK NUMBER DESCRIPTION SCOPE SCHEDULE 1E51*RD-003 Rupture Disc (SH1-3ho) Vendor Qualification By Burst Test G

-004 Dynamic Loads Are Insignificant.

1E51*S-056 Strainer (SH1-148) Perform Dynamic Analysis To Mark II Loads G And Current NRC Criteria.

1F11*T0 g ) Tool - Fuel Prep Machine Perform Dynamic Analysis To MC II Loads And 3/82 ,

Current NRC Criteria 1F11'TU-008 Tool - General Purpose Perform Analysis, Using Required Acceleration 'G (E0ll) Grapple At bpport Hook.

1F13*SL-001 Sling - Dryer And L ce As For 1F11*TU-008 (E011) 0 (E008) Separator 1F13*TO-016 Tool - Reactor Cavity Same As For 1F11*TU-008 (E011) G (E009) Head Strong Back 1F14*TO-029 Tool - Control Rod Same As For 1F11*TU 006 (E011) G (E002) Grapple 1F15'CRN-009 Crane - Refuel Compare To Similar Equipment Already Found To h/82 (E003) Platform Assembly Be Adequate. If Adequacy Cannot Be shown, Perform Dynamic Analysis. .

1F16*CSK-01 Cask - Defective Fuel Same As For 1F16*RAK-11 (E007) (Coupled To h/82 (E009) Storage 1F16'RAK-10 (E004)

F 1F16'RAK-09 Rack - Fuel In RPV Same As For 1F16*RAK-11 (E007), Seismic Loads 3/82 ,

(E006) Only 1F16"RAK-10 Rack - Control Rod Fuel Same As For 1F16'RAK-11 (E007) (Coupled To 3/82 (E004) Storage 1F16'CSK-01 (E009)  :

1F16*RAK-11 Rack - New Fuel Storage Compare To Similar Equipment Already Found To 3/8a (E007) Be Adequate. If Adequacy Connot Be Shown, Perform Non-Linear Analysia.

l P

t 6

t t- '

00CHET $4-322 REVIS10H 1 SHOREMAN EQUIPHENT REQUALIFICf. TION PLAN DATE: HOVEleE3 20. 1981 LCHU ISLAte LIGHTING C0tFANY PAGEs 4 0F 4

~

j EQUIPHENT l HANN ttABER DESCRIPTION . SCOPE SCHEDLA.E i

I 1F14mRAN-025 RACH - POISON CtNITAIM IE0151 PERFORM H0H-L1HEMI AHALYSIS. 3/82

\

1911sTH-450 tat 9( - DRA1H SLR9'e 1

-054 QUALIFICATI0H BY WATIC ANALYSIS. 8 REACTOR SUILDitte (SH1-34tl 1H11mPit.-AC1 PANEL HYDROSEM ORYSEM

-ACE AHALYSIS VEte0R TESTING TO CURRENT istC CRITERIA. TO 3/02 QUALIFY SEVERAt. PANELS (CLASS IE COPFCHENTS)

(Sett-It5 )

1H11mPPt.-408 PANEL-PCHER RANGE (P406l REVIEN DTHAHIC QUALIFICATION TEST CH A SINILAR 12/91 HEUTROH CA8INET TEST PANEL. QUALIFY THE SHOREHAM PANEL BY SIttILARITY.

.1 1HtioPtt.-939 PANELS-SCURCE RANGE IP030) C0tFARETOitECENTTESTAteSH0HADEQUACY 12/01 HOLEITOR/INTERtWOIATE DY SIMILAftITY.* t

-031 RANGE H0HITOR

-032 '

-033 1H50eTN-088 TAtet-RSSVS Ate CRAC 445Al.IFICATION SY STATIC ANALYSIS. 's SURGE ISH1-114)

IP41mPtt.-FX1 FD AUXILARY RELAY .

VEte0R TESTIMB THE CLASS IE ELECTRICAL CODPONENTS 3/tt CABINET (SH1-125) TO CURRENT lerc REQUIREHENTS  ;

P 1P91sPS-101 PRESSLNit SNITCH

-008 ISH1-398i vel #0R TESTING TO M II LOAOS' Ate CtNIRENT l#tC 1t/01 CRITERIA.

-909

• ~ 1P4tmPS-St1 PRESSURE SHITCH

-922 (SH1-3443 VEle0R TESTING TO M II LOAOS Ale CURRENT letc 1E/e1 CRITERIA.

-994 IP58ePS-195 PRESSimE SMITCH

-113 iSH1-344i VEle0R TESTING To let II LonOS Are CtstRENT lett 1t/01 CRITERIA.

i 00 1

_ m_ ..- _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

DOCHET St-3tt SHOREHAM EQUIPHEHT I;EQUni.IFI*-.tTION PLAN

[.EVISICH 1 BATEt HOVEleE3 24, 1961 LONS ISLAte LIGHTINS COlFAMf -

PACE: 5 0F 4 EQUIPHENT HARN lAABER DESCRIPTION SCOPE SCHEDLLE r

1RZ4mPtt.-111 PANEL-LPCI SIP VEle0R TESTItal TO DM II LOADS Ate 5 1

-lit (SH1-439) CURRENT tetC CRITERIA.

-113 t 1RtteTRS-111X TRANSFER SHITCH-

-11tY LPCI-ATS VEte0R TESTIH8 TO IM II LOA 05 Ate CURRENT 1t/41 l #9tC CRITERIA.

p* ISH1-4303 4

1R43aTH-135 TAIM-FUEL OIL QUALIFICATION BY STATIC ANALYSIS. 8 OAY tSH1-119)

IT48sEXJ-49 EXPAHSIOli JOINT 50 VEtt0R 40ALIFICATIGH ST HYDRO-STATIC TEST. 12/91 HYDROGEN REcotBINER DYHANIC LOADS ARE INSIGNIFICANT.

tSH1-4423 VELAH YOHf3 3" - tea HOV'S ESH1-84V)

• VEte0R SUALIFICATICH BY DYH4111C AHmLYSIS lt/e1 TO DM II LOADS Ate CtmRENT letC CRITERIA.

1/t= - 1 1/t* HDV'S ISH1-214) 12/01 1" - ta SMV'S (SH1-1538 12/91 A/D YOMES 19' - 24* HDV'S (SH1-SSAD) vet 90R QUALIFICATION BY DYtthifIC ANALYSIS 12/41 70 PM II LOADS Ate CtmRENT HRC CIIITERIA.

FISHER YONES Yt" A0V'S (SH1-111) VEteOR SUALIFICATISt BY DY1tAHIC ANAL.YSIS 1t/61 TO PM II LOADS Ate CtatRENT tetC CRITERIA.

It" A0V'S tSH1-172) <

It/81 2" PCW'S ISH1-3101

• 12/01 ta - 4a TCV'S (SH1-310)

~

12/81 10" - It" TCV'S ISH1-4233 1t/81 PRATT YCHES 4" - 20" HOV'S (SH1-197)

- VEte0R GUALIFICATIOtt BY DYHAMIC ANALYSIS 1t/91 TO IN II LOADS Ate CURRENT F5tC CRITERIA.

~ GRIPMEL YONES 1" - 4" HOV'S (SN1-203) VEte0R QUALIFICATION BT DYHAHIC AHat.YSIS 1t/91 TO DM II LOADS Ate CtBIRENT HRC CRITERIA. .

EI .

DOCHET 50-322 SHOREMAH EQUIPMENT REQUAl.!rICATIcit PLAtt DATE MOVEteE2 29, 1981 REVIS1tM 1 LOHs ISLAND t.IGHTINS COPFAHT PAGEt 4 0F 4 ROUIPflENT ltARM NtASER DESCRIPIICH SCOPE SCHEDULE TOPES

~

TONES 3/4" - 4* A0V'S (SH1-3141 VEte00 QUALIFICATI0H BT OYttAHIC AHALYSIS 12/81 TO IN II LOAOS Ate CURPENT tetc CRITERIA.

3 4* - 16* PCV'S (SH1-318) 12/81 la LCV'S (SH1-3IS) 1t/61 L!ttITORQUE 3" - 20* IIDV'S (SH1-84WD OPERATORS QUALIFICATION ST DYNAHIC TESTING TO DH II LOADS Ate CURRENT CRITERIA.

2/82 It* - 29' lev'S :SH1-seAOI i

2/82 da - te* Hov'S IS11-1911

'2/82 la - 4* rWS (SH1-tes) 2/82 1/t* - 1 1/2" Il0V'S tSH1-2191 '

2/82 1= - ta lev'S (SH1-tS31 2/82 SETTIS ft* A0W'S ISH1-1111 VEle0R SUALIFICATI0tt BT DYttANIC M4AI.TSIS. 1t/01 OPERATORS

, lea A0V'S 43M1-112) 12/s1

[

t BECH ta PCW'S (SH1-31tl . VEtOOR QUALIFICATION ST OYHANIC TESTING lt/e1 l CPERATORS

' TO IN II LOADS Ate CtNtRENT CRITERIA.

ta - 4" TCV'S (SN1-3101 12/e1 COPES 3/4" - 4" A0V'S (SN1-314) VEICOR QUALIFICATI0ft BT DYHAlfIC TEST!HS It/41 OPERATORS TO IN II LOAOS Are CURRENT CRITERIA.

4* - It* PCV'S ISett-310) (LIIIIT SalITCH Are 30LEtl0109 ' 1t/01 la LCV'S ISH1-310) 4 -

12/91

,,JISHER 19" - It* TCV'S (SH1-423)

OPERATORS VEte04 QUALIFICATION 8T OYttAttIC TESTING 1t/41

~ To tH II LOAOS Ate CURRENT CRITERIA.

l (LIMIT SMITCH Ate SOLEleIDI

'i 7

• i

! II

{ .

I I

l s

t J

l 4

1 4

s i

\ ,

1 1

1 j -

a i Attachment 2 s.

j Responses to Raquests for Additional Information i

j Shoreham Nuclear Poiner Stagion 4

i

November 2d, 1981 i

t 4

e i

i e

i I

I l

t h

8- .

e S

1 SQRT Audit Item 8 1C41*P-024 (C41C001), SLC Pump and Mot'or The effects of dynamic coupling between the pump and motor as they may affect operability have been addressed analytically. The attached General Electric Company report, entitled " Interaction Effects Analysis of the SLC Pump & Motor" dated October 29, 1981, shows that dynamic coupling does not affect the operability of this assembly. Furthermore, the effects of dynamic coupling on the required function vill be considered for all similar pairs of equipment. -

4 O

I

a. k, a

, , _ g e _ w . . . -w- mae m - e ow*-- m"o - **v-* **we+= " * * * * **

w~ - w

of..

~. . . .. .

. . . _ _ . . . , ~ . . . . . , ~

SHOREHAM flUCLEAR POWER STATION

. INTERACTI0fi EFFECTS ANALYSIS-0F SLC PUMP & MOTOR OCTOBER 29, 1981 This documer.t was prepared from a study entitled "Shorehain Coupling Effect Report, SLC Pump / Motor" dated 10/22/81, prepared by P. V. Vo and approved by J. S. Mokri, General Electric Company 4

RWH:hmc/9X . -

10/29/81 a 2

. ~.# .:.7 '. . vj. * ., ...:.*.2..o..,...,,........

. .. ..;. s. . . ... 3, ...,,1,.,

. . s,..,,...,,.,,.,

.,.vy s.: x- . .. .. , . . . .r..p. ,,.... . .. . s s . .

s. , :... u. .;, ABSTRACT. ,.,.. , .,p .j., .y. ,.g. ; ,,g,., ,,. ,...,;.,....,,, .

An analysis has been perfomed to evaluate the interaction between the Shoreham Standby Liquid Control (SLC) pump and motor. The extent of this interaction was detemined by assuming the SLC pump shaft and motor shaft are disconnected, and then calculating the relative displacement of the shaft center lines when subjected to dynamic and static loads, themal displacement, and initial misalignment.

The results show that the displacements due to both continuous and intemittent loads between the two center lines of the pump and motor shafts do not exceed the allowable limit for cont.inuous loading of the coupling hardware used to join the shaf ts. This result for continuous loading resolves the coupling concerns of the SLC pump and motor for all loading conditions.

RWH:hmc/9H 10/29/81 O

=

w  ?.:. .< g .:.i . ,q y. w . 6 . w .,. s .. ..

.. ,- .. . n, 3 .. w :. s . n . u. .. w . :. ., ,r..;.y...e

.......1 .

~.......n.......

lj 'ly s.*'t 5m. s?

• Wf.H.:'(*~.:.:sl,st**>.i.sb DESCP.IPTIO!:

e..,' 4.~~.{:,.'.

'. u.

,* *g . pq*:}n~f ] * '.ot: n .v.mmeh>%Q.'p '; p.s a t) **w 1

i The SQRT analysis of the Shoreham SLC pump and motor has previously been perfortned separately for both the pump and motor during the faulted condition. The motor and pump have not yet been dynamically analyzed or tested as a complete assembly for functional operation under all loading i conditions. A static analysis has therefore been performed to calculate

{ displacements of the pump and motor shaft center lines under dynamic and

static loads to determine whether they exceed the allowable limits of j the coupling hardware which joins the shafts together.

l The calculated natural frequency of the motor is 239 bz and the pump is j

136 hz. The fundamental frequency of either the pump or motor, when attached by the coupling hardware, has been calculated to be higher then

{

the 2PA frequency of 100 hz. Therefore, a static approach can be used ;

{ to calculate relative displacements.

{'

Several physical aspects of the pump and motor that affect the -

calculational method were considered, usir.g conservative assumptions, as i

)

follows:

l

~

1. i.oads were considered to be acting in the worst direction; that is, l the hydrodynamic, seismic and nozzle loads were pointed in the same direction (i.ncluding both horizontal and vertical directions) and i

perp1ndicular to the shaft center line.

l 2. The pump and motor were each considered to be a rigid body. '

i Therefore, the total forces were applied at the center of gravity 1 of the pump and motor.

3. The stiffness values of the pump 'end motor are much higher than for i the cbupling hardware so that the applied forces acting on the pump '

! cannot be transmitted to the motor or vice v;rsa. Thus, the i analysis can be made separately on the pump and motor.

T 1 4. The most flexible parts of the pump or motor are the legs attaching j

the pump or motor to the base plate. The static deflections of

! pump or motor legs were calculated separately for both the

{

i horizontal loads and the vertical loads. Also calculated separately was the linear thermal expansion on the pump or motor legs due to the temperature difference between the ambient

temperature and the full operating temperature. The total linear 1

nisalignment of the pump and motor shafts, due to the leg  ;

deflections, was then determined by adding up the components. I

5. The vertical loads can cause an angular misalignment of the shafts due to a deflection of the base plate, assuming that no grout

exists under the base plate. This assumption is very conservative' l

since the steel mid-supports under the base plate, which have an

! effect similar to grout, were neglected.

4 i

e

-- -~ , ,w- -- - - , - - -+ - - - - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

%.Obw.

. . ..'e:.i

. . .h.s *.m +: **

• u

. ... a.~L.:e .. :p.'x *p. .:. .,ty ,,;;.4,4, .q.p y, ; .s, y 4 y. ,,; ,;,s

.,c' ' i.'se . ',c. . .

. . , , ,, g

. w: . ( > . s;. .,...-.y.... . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , ....,,,,..,.3..,

y W.r.a..,-a w n c.:RESUL-IS AND40NCLU51G45.m;pf 9..v..wpe:, ,rn,3:cagfi.g.g.,7mj;,:g.q,..' .,,,,gg

, u The results of the calculations are listed below:

Linear Misalignment Due to applied hydrodynamic, seismic and 0.004 inches static loads (faulted condition) l Due to thennal expansion 0.0004 inches Due to initial misalignment when connected 0.004 inches Total (faultedconditions) 0.0084 inches Ancular Misalignment

• Based on all loads acting on flexible 0.06*

base plates (faulted condition)

The coupling hardware used is a Thomas coupling, Type 226DBZ-A. The installation instructions for this hardware state that the maximum allowable misalignment variatien is 0.012 inches for the coupling to operate continuously. The maximum allowable angular misalignment is 0.5' based on discussions with the coupling manufacturer. .Therefore, it is concluded that the linear and angular misalignments between the ceriter lines of the SLC pump and motor shafts, due to dynamic and static loads, thermal expansion, and initial misalignment, do not exceed the allowable limits of the coupling hardware.-

RWH:hme/91 10/29/B1 .

~

l 1

i I

y ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - - - . - - - - _

. , _ . __ _ _ _ . . _ . . . _l SQRT Audit Item 17 -

1331*ADV-082, Air-Operated Valve l

~

The dynamic accelerations acting at the operators of valves 1831*AOV-081 and 082 were derived from the analysis,of the current piping and support design configuration. Valve accelerations will be confirmed based on an "as-built" review of the piping systems after all support installations are complete.

The SQRT summaries will be finalized upon evaluation of the "as-built" systems.

SQRT Audit Item 18 IE11*PC7003, Pressure Control Valve At the time of the site audit, questions were raised regarding the installa-tion standards for instrument tubing, such as is attached to this valve.

It is our understanding that this issue was satisfactorily resolved with the I

SQRT reviewers at a meeting on September 3, 1981. at Brookhaven National i

Laboratory. The Shoreham instrument tubing installation standard and sup-porting computer calculations were reviewed and found acceptable at that meeting.

1 g h I

1

. 1 1

i

. l SQRT Audit Item AB ._

1Tk6'AOD OkO. Air-Operated Damper Information previously provided regarding the operability of this air-operated damper indicated functional test leakage amounts greater than 6 m. The Vendor has confirmed that this is incorrect. The actual test leak rate was less than 6 seem (meter lower limit) and the marimum allowable leakage for satisfactory actuator operation is 15 seca. The Vendor's revision to its qualification test report reflecting this fact is attached. (3 Pages) 0 4

h f

l

, , , , , ,_ .. .-- - . . ~ . + - - - ~~- - ' ~ '

. ~~..

.- ~

./ .. e .

.. . . w ,: r ..r --..n we .

.u m .. ..

~ .

I ,r eg)L o f ci .ll vaiW"h' -

.- .* I ggg(c)T)l,l.+ Us -

t l Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. Date: October 23, 1981 245 Sum =er Street Boston, Massachusetts 02107 Subj ect - Job Name

! Attention:

Shoreham Nuclear Power Station Mr. T. M. Jacobs Unit #1 Lead Control Encineer J.O. #11600.00/P.O. #346920 MCC P0NERS Job No.: .

- , 510-N-5049 Gentlemen: --

~

h*c are sending you C herewith; under separate cover the following items: '

Three (3) copies of Revision A to Wyle Laboratories Report

$44540-1 (10/8/81) for the environmental qualification of safety related instruments and devices for the Shoreham Station.

1 l

These are submitted C for approval; C for your use for correctien.

Remarks: 1. Please discard the pages involved and replace wi'th the attached revised pages. .

Reference:

E. J. Brabazon (S&W) le Eter to W. A. Roberts (MCC Powers) dated September 9, 1981.

MCC POWERS TRANSMITTAL NO. P-llo Please address your reply to: MCC POWERS

, cc: Mr. R. Plant (S&W) 0 West Fargo Avenue

1. • W. DeWar (S&W) Skokie, Illinois

, Mr E. J. Brabazon (S*W) 60077 Mr. C. C. Klapes -(S&W-w/ encl)

J. A. Harmon Attn: E. R. Tagare I

W. A. Roberts J. Hartgenbush Telephone 312/677-9580 File

• MCC POWERS A UNIT OF MARK CONTROLS CORPORATION

-e-- - - = ~

.;. ..... s/. 5.:.. . , . . .,.. : . . a . ..,.. <. ::.,,.,.,, .: w. , ... .., . .n. , ., p:, ,,.a a, , .,,c n.

R E,VISIO N S ..

e.Evisiom

'A '. '

g........-.

.< . . , ....x....

,. ...;.. . e:, . .: . .. . . . .... . , . . . r. . ..

k *;'. - q-4:, w:..~ . .*g,1 ww : w . *. :.n. 4.4 ~, :e.. ..,.s 'ge g.~m n *.,. .aM.:. ....< ;s . a

. .){.SJ,,}.V.0Bt,...g5g,.,1,

. .._.w,,,,

r. p.w. : , r ~ . r---m..w. . ma .

oATE. 10/C8/C1 w j ecansmme assmcan a oversaas enoup

=

l E

l

. .F.

REv.t=0. I OATE '

FAGE CA F A AAGRAPM AF .:TED l M l ADP**.,[ .

DESORIMION OF CHANGES i r s n ino , 31/4 4 v4 4 3 . 4 v .v v4 .vii .yiii . I N!S [ h Chance " Final Section X" to

)}*

i lxiv,xv l Y[,lf/"FinalSectionIX"

h0/ng/p1 lxii . I-60. IX-66 VQ* f

t. WS Mf #.f' s Chance "1 SCCM" to "15 SCCM" l' '7 l l s vr} Chance >6 SCCM" to "<6 SCCM" l

i l l l r l7 1 I I'

!l . . - . , . ., , + + 4 . . .. .... .. .

l l

8 1

eo l i

jk . _ . .

l i -

1 1

}

l 1

)

1 .

1i

!L j 1 -

I f

1 .

l

.! 4 l

4

!l

j. . . . ._

i il i

a .

1, i

1 i

1 I i 1 o I 1

- )

o FORM 1054-316-a

j I

qas

..w..e--~_ .m

________q ' -

t *.  : . 4 , i .

?- 3

.  !.. i '

..  : s. .

TABLE Il

SUMMARY

OF FUNCTIONAL TESTS AND OPERATIONAL CllECKS (CONTINUED)

FUNCTIONAL T'E $ T $ OP[8611pMAL CilFCES .

Results. Post- Post- Post-Dasellne Final Aging, Radiat5on Selsmic Test item hequirements Section i Sec.ilon IX Sect. Ill - Sect. V, Sect. VII A femperature Transmitter o 4.66 1 15 VOC output across Barber-Coleman Co., terminals "TXI" and " CON" with '

TSP-8101 1000-ohm resistor across both "lSA

(item No. 15T terminals. 4.73 VOC 5 90 VOC j Xi X X o Less than l VOC output across terminals "TXI" and "COM" with j Jumper across both'"lSA" terminals .28 VOC .21 VOC -

I o 4 VOC output across "0Pl" and '

"COM" with Jumper across "4" and "5". ~

4.33 VOC 4.3 VOC-I o Less than I VOC output across "M+" ,

I and "H " with Jumper across "4" and "5". , 1.997 VOC 1 96 VOC Q*a o More than 11 VOC across "TXI" and IE "C0H" with "lSA" terminals open. 13 22 VOC 12.82 VOC g.

f~ o less than 2 VOC across "0Pl" and h(

j "COM" with "lSA" terminals open. l.45 VOC l.40 VOC .

.?

Electric Actuator, o When actuated, did shaft turn Raymond Control smoothly through 90*f Yes Yes X X X

$ Y 'I*** R-24 g "[*'g

, o Verify return to original position when power removed. Yes Yes o Output torque should be 300 1 IS Inch pounds. 834 In-lb 775 in-Ib s

(See N0A #1, Ap i. I,Section I.)

o inlet pressure at which shaft @

Air Cylinder Actuator, ,

G begins to rise. ,

22.5 psi 23 psi ~

Centerline, Inc., X X X 32046-6 o Pressure must be 55 + 5 pel at '

3 (Item No. 17)

=

, 3 3/4" stroke. 56.5 pel 55 psi o Leakage must not exceed ISsece <6 seem (meter A'

<6 seem (meter at 80 psi. , ,

lower;llelt) lower limit)

'l ,

i 1  !

i i i

J , i

- .'-I  : 4

SQRT Audit Iten: A9 _

1Tk6* MOD-035. Motor-Operated Damper This motor-operated damper is mounted on a support frame which has a cal-

,._,_._._ culated fundamental _ frequency of 24 Ez. Therefore, the input acceleration ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

i for damper stress and deflection calculations should be obtained from the greatest value of floor spectra at 24 Ez and above,.and with a multimode i

factor of 1 5 applied. Review of the Vendor's analysis shova adequate

-.. margins in the blade stress and deflection under these loads, i.e., 1.5 ~-

times the spectral acceleration at 24 Ez.

• Revised pages of the SQRT and Summary and Evaluation forms are attached reflecting the correct required acceleration loads and the associated minimum margin- of safety. . . . .

O

^

• 4 m.

.. QUALIFICATION SIDefARY AND EVALUATION .

4 l 1. Component Name Volume Control Demoers including Electric Operator and Limit Switch i

i

2. Mark Numbers IT46*F.OD-034 A&B -

) 3. Qualification Documentation i.

! A.

)i Qualification Sumary of Equipment (SQRT form). including required response spectra if applicable.

Raclosed. -

1 i

B. Reference Documents in the Central File Package J  !

j Referance Document Revisico.

Number Identification or Date Organization / Title / Subject 1 AMV Model Revision 0

> American Wruing and Ventilati: g DAA-P-7402 29 March 77 Seismic Analysis Report 2 Uyle Report l . . No. 44340-1 24 June 80 Wyle Laboratories (Huntsville)

-- 3 Wyle Report i

No. 44057-1 30 May 78'

! C.' Additional Supporting Documents not in taa Nuclear Environmental Qualification Central Tile !?ackage I Reports.

j Document Revision

ID No. or Date Organization / Title / Subject i .

SNRC-535 March 5, 1981 LILCD Seismic Qum7Hication Review - response to Raquest for Additional Information, Response 271.4 SEl- 319 Revisimi 3 Stone & Webster specification for automatic 6 March 81 temperature contral-systems for heatings ventil-

{ ating, and air conditioning.

l 4. Shoreham Requirements (dynamic loads, functional requirements) 1 The l'0D is used to control secordary enntaineert air tempe ature and volume and j must function after a faulted event. -

. . . The subject eqdipment must be capable of withstanding the combined horizontal .

and vertical loadings for the upset and faulted conditions as described in Ref. 3.A.

l

• 1 1 . .

l .

~

t

5. Demonstrated capability (from qualification report) -

1. The seismic smalysis report for the mechanical portion of the damper demonstrates that

', the calculated stresses and deflections are significantly less (margin of safety > 3 9) than the specified allowables for .75g horir.ontal and .513 vertical upset and faulted

• conditions. .

2. The seismic test reports for the electric operator and limit switch demonstrated ac-ceptability to acceleration levels higher than these specified by the horizontal and vertical 3RS. Post-paismic functional testing wcs performed. No salfunction or spurious operation were evident. -

'g .

t e.

_ , , , , _ . .. - . . + - + * - - * - * * * = * * *

• 6 Rationale fer Qualificstion j ,

iSRI-319 i .

c. Appracch (analysis, test, bath) Item (2) i L __....

1.. Qualification of,dcapers was by static analysis utilizing hand calculation methods to l____ deteraire frequency (and associated g-value) and resultant stresses. Blade deflectionst 4

cicarances were calculated.

i j 2. Quclification of the electric actuator and limit switch was by biaxial multi-frequency random m.otion tests, as:plitude controlled et 1/3 octave bandwidths over the range of

~

f i to 250 Mr. Randw signals were simultaneous and independent (phase-incoherent).

i The limit switch was subjected to 5 CBE and 2 SSE tests in each orientation. The electric actuator waa: subjected to 6 SSE tests in each orientation. Low-level resonanes

search tests were employed.-

i b. Response to Loads (including high-frequency considerations) 1 1. ,.

j The mechanical portion of damper is anlayzed to .75g horizontal and .51 vertical ,

.versus a required 2.0g horizontal and 1.5g vertical for faulted conditions. (obtained c--- ' by applying a smilti-mode factor of 1.5 to the RRS of Raf. 3.A. at frequency of -~

' damper = 241!:.)- Since r:argins of safety identified by stress analysis are high.

j' (3.9), the damers are considered qnmitfied td these standards. . .Natur&1* Frequency of the blade = 630 Hz (Raf. 3.B.1). Therefore, the blade stiffness, when coupled .

with the support stiffness does not result in a lower overall natural frequency.

The g loading at the base'can be also used in the damper blade analysis. Margdn j ' of aafety is based on far.ited loads & upset allowables. '

1 1 2.

{

The electric operator and limit switch are also qualified vtth high asrgins of sefaty as the testing input used for both the horizontal ZPA and vertical ZPA

{

was 5 g's compared to a required .6g's as shown by RRS .in Raf. 3.A. Also, the electric actuator was subjected to a conservative number of SSE level tests (6 SSE levels). Therefore, the operator and limit switch exceed the requirements of these standards.

, - - - - ~  ?

j c. Operability * .

j

1. Operability of the dnaper is demonstrated by a deflection analysis of the damper blades j

4' which shout a deflection of 0.0 inch versus a .028 inch allowable.

j

2. The electric operator was electrically energized'and monitored for any change in state.

The limit switch was monitored for contact chatter / spurious operation (approx. 2msecs).

} Testing results including post-test results verified functional capability to these

! standards.

• 4 l -

j .

d. Fiald vs Qualification Mounting .

All bolting pceterns/ hole sizes utilized for testing the operator ard limit switch are the same as the field mounting. The damper assembly, limit switch mountieg bracket and blade

• j operator .aounting bracket qualif1' cation mountings are the same as the field mounting. . -

Reviewer's

Conclusions:

Based on the vendor's stress analysis report (Ref.1) aad subsequent test report (Raf. 2 & 3), it is concluded that the volume coatrol dampers will perform the required function, as describ.id, and thereby meets the 'equirements specified for the combi .ed hydrodyncaic crJ seismic loads.

8

( .

).- ,

f 1 . .

SH1- 319 Item ( 2 )

III. Is Ecuipeent Available for Inspection in the plant: [I] Tes [ ]No IV. Equipment. Qualification Method:

[1] Test [ ] Analysis [ ] Combination of Test and Analysis Qualification Report *: h4 ,,.4 e t..+ . ,,, wu e.~...a N'urments (No. Title and Date) 44540-1 LIMIT SWITCH 6/24/80 Coarpany that Prepared Report: Vvle Labs Ccapany that Reviewed Report: MCC Powers V. Vibration Input Required:

I. Loads considered: a. [ ] Seismic only

b. [ ] Hydrodynamic only

~

c. [I] Combination of (a) and (b)

2. Method of Combining RRS: [] Absolute f,um g] SRSS [ ~~I

'(other, specify)

3. Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): I

4. Damping Corresponding to RRS: Upset 25 Faulted AI

5. Required Accelerat' ' in Each Direction:[]ZPA [I] Other> ARS S 24HZ x 1.5 (specify)

~

Upset S/S = 1.5 F/B = 1.5 V= 1.0 Faulted S/S = _ 2.0 F/B = 2.0 V= 1.5

6. Were fatigue effects or other vibration leads :onsidered?

[I]Tes [ ] No If yes, describe loads considered and bow they vere treated in overall qualificatf.on program: To the extent t 4m1 ed by im.w.197q

• NOTE- If more than one report, complete Items IV through VII for each report.

2-e._.

e ,

i

~

4 SH1- 319 Item ( 2 ) _.. _ .. .

VII. If Qualification by Analysis, then complete

1. Method of Analysis:

[ ] Static Analysis [I] Equivalent Static' Analysis

[ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum 2... Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):

I. . ..

S/S =__ >60 Hz F/B = > 60 Hz V= # 60 Hz ._

3..-.Model Type

[]3D [ ]2D [ ]lD

[]FiniteElement

~ ~

[] Beam [X] Closed Form Solution

4. [ ]Compurer Codes

N/A Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A

[X]HandCalculations -

4

5. Method of_ Combining Dynamic Responses: [3AbsoluteSun [)SRSS Algebraic t {I]Other:

(specify)

Sa.Inhtg-level: thset E .75 y .51 Faulted E .75 Y .51 i

i

6. Damping: Upset 21 Faulted I.% Basis for the damping used: RGl.61

7. Support Consideratiosa in the model

Service Conditions

8. Critical Structural Elements:

A. Governing I,oad Service Total

• Identification I,ocation Stress 4 or Response I,evel Stress Allow

. All Stresses well below allouable (Factor of Safety 3.9)

Based on using recuired e = 2.00 =2.67 Horj M = 2.94 Ve r impat g .75 51 - - -

, _ . . B . _ .. _

Maximim Allowable Deflection Maximum Critical to Assure Functional Deflection I,ocation Operability

. 000" Blade .028" l

l l

h

.7.

e

. . . .m,. +.-.--4 . + - - * . . ~ + * * " * " ' * * ~ " ** "

~ '~'w