ML20039E367
| ML20039E367 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crane  |
| Issue date: | 12/21/1981 |
| From: | Lockinghill D AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED |
| To: | Smith I Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201070200 | |
| Download: ML20039E367 (2) | |
Text
, -.. -.......,.,
)).2.i5.'?:.T: SD:RRy..
E' !jff 13M dr 1/t/
.C -
/A m m e /d <%
.r24
'81 EC 31 N0:40
, 3,, y Clu-Al On
[l OFr.
' 00C'
- 1 SEh1 Zu q Lt!,
- cLs, esa Ag a x:c9 s, r ALJ Tnz - t L-AJ d2 & b h J AJu fffQ Gul.4 g
e
~
1.?'
E'VED ;
IWAf. O.C.
a o g _,- c es y y. ez,g
=
xc5),
ppy a
e 4g ja
,p.
an I il A~F f rns daeu,L n
af~l.
AQ&)
k EA,} A L m,n L g k 4G en, d
&L~,JJ L}
jay tu e
~ws e
i nas z
~Wf bA 4.
(L.
ay=y, i W
AM-k fu 2 ++
~J.4 zi a f c4 - m y sa,.a 6 a, a s
+
sn a> a y nM
-tA ha n
nj y.
,y, bsl' g w.'
820107
/ 6 fRADyff0 A
Z,,,
,o, 0
vestigation, analysis and techno!ogical reviews lat t.hought applied to e given gibberi:di and a reactor intt
- c..
yw.
n
~a,9 9, Mg T 9 broblem could be measured radioactive mash. We.have a 3.':
ij./ [i j " (
b h.
3 by the tirae consumed in right to ask why the licepsing heing it and the weight of the board's judgment w ill b s.
final report, then the accom-right this time when it war Ol'
_M@p[ j) ) h 3h'_ 0 blisfiment
]
of the Atomic virong the last time;
'l (Safety and Licensing Board
'0 d9 %}
i x s.: -
coking into the restart of the TtlERE IS MORE to the
. _ LTnit I nuclear reactor at issue of re. starting Unit I than Three Mile Island merits a a technolo3ical evaluation
"-1,,])
-/d:3 high ranking. After spending made by a panel dedicated t@
. many months taking testimo-Isolating nuclear power deci-p2
. ny on the fitness of the un-sion-making from the influ=
~;.T~
damaged nuclear plant and ence of the hest communityc
/ M.x the competeni:y of the man-It is an indication of how dec QW
'agement of. General Public void the_processis of sciisitivc
.~
Utilities to operate it, the ity to its rnisiaFsiiiid a mea 7 Aw othree-member boar'd has re-sure of its lack of social O1h).
.' leased its findings in an 800- accountability that theiipera=
[];
'.page report. Its predictable tion of~UliEl can bTson~sid m2 conclusion: The Nuclear Reg-. 'cTed while only_yardi aW5g
,, q:
ulatory Commission should its sister plant sits in ruin,
!&h1, grant GPU permission to bontami5ated by radioactivi=
Q p.y commence operation of the ty, an acknowledged heaikh t/ AE3 reactor.
and safety _hauard which con =
g.s But if the licensing board t_inues unrAsolved.
f
,. was " exhaustive" in. Its in-The system has failed ts
- M
_l.
I.7:PM]
. quiry it surely was not thor.come to grips with this nucle =
E ough; if it asked many ques-ar stepchild. No one wants tg d-4.
'i W
- W's
~ tions,it failed to ask the right admit paternity, so the casi=
j
.' ' questions; if it looked at eve-est thing to do is to ignore it f
c g 1.gmf j
- ry screw, it 'could not grasp let it sit there. The govern =
% g '/.
g
. the entirety of the problem.It ment licenses them, the utili=
y
. did, essentially, what a previ-ties operate them and ths g
h ous licensing board had done Geod Lord cleans them upe
.. _N d>
~ 'in' certifying the safety and The system never was pre-
'n, i
. soundness of ' Unit 2, which, pared to deal with a $1 billion me Q
in a shorter time than it took nuclea' r accident and it is ne i.S?Md.
4
' to pass the NRC's rigorous more prepared today, yet 18 g~i 4 *: review, became a world sym-proceeds with licensing of l
4
~~,' bol of a technology that not nuclear plants as if Ti,11 nev=
} i,g Q
_. only failed, but threatened er happened, as if it didn't ex=
lives and fortunes of 'ist,' as if there wasn't an ulE
=
.the
. }{]
[:
. thousands of people.
too' real risk of radioactivs s
g It is possible to separate contamination of down-
,".the technical connections be-stream community water 6
b5 b
tween the two reactors at systems and the irreplaceable
',ITMI -- as is being done -- but Chesapeake Bay fishery.
"Q l
',1it is even beyond the ' power Only a. system that le
$"3)1
. of the NRC to alter.their morally bankrupt would car]
physical proximity or to ex-rj_oltits_ritWoGitesting_td p2%
. tinguish the trauma inflicted power plants a:rc the_innneuausness.of nuclea
- from there on a public trust-
_ (O Wai3 q.r.rq.
. ing of thejudgment, integrity.
of, one-that-says;itfisn't. Tih
\\
.' and technical competence of final decision on the recom; s
the utility and its nuclear mendations of the licensias pqwg"
' overseer. The licensing board board rests with the full com0 AmkM h
cotdd deal with the myriad of mission of the NRC and ih M
c.,
technical questions, it could I
F 9
. net -- it would not -- address. will be less of a judgment og Unit -1 than it is a judgmeng
- h.. g.... (
the psychological result on itself and the morality o" l l' "
S when a nuclear acchtent ren-the molicinRrecus
.,