Text

Responds to 811203 Request for Addl Info Re Seismic Qualification Review Team Audit Concerning Reassessment Basis Earthquake Time History Synthesization & site-specific Spectra Comparison,Structural & Equipment Evaluation
	ML20039C663
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	12/23/1981
From:	Tauber H; DETROIT EDISON CO.
To:	Youngblood B; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	EF2-55-704, NUDOCS 8112300015
	Download: ML20039C663 (104)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:.. { H:rry Truber er and Cons: octon Detroit Edison !517s!! ~ 4 s RECEIVED DEC2 919816 6-sammusuwcwan Q '"E8 @M December 23, 1981 EF2 - 55,704 g g N Mr. B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

Reference:

Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-341

Subject:

Seismic Qualification Review Team (SQRT) Audit - Response to Open Items Your letter dated December 3, 1981 indicated that addi-tional information was needed in response to the SQRT audit Follow-Up Action No. 3, as discussed in our October 29, 1981 meeting. In response to this request, we submit the following additional information: e Reassessment basis earthquake time history synthesization and site specific spectra com-parison (Attachment A) e Supplemental seismic reassessment information: structural evaluation (Attachment B) e Supplemental seismic reassessment information: equipment evaluation (Attachment C) Your December 3 letter also indicated that additional information is needed in response to Open Items No. 6 and No. 7 We will provide that information later. Sincerely, s I jA 2V fi{Dg cc: Mr. L. L. Kintner I Mr. B. Little 8112300015 811223 PDR ADOCK 05000341 A PDR

._.._m. ... _...... 4. g. ? Attachment A to: EF2-55,704 Reassessment Basis Earthquake Time History Synthesization and Site Specific Spectra Comparison

a.

a A synthesized site specific time history was generated for the purpose of reassessing the essential structures and equipment.

The THS time history produces response spectra which envelope the site specific ground motion spectra for all applicable damping values. Figures 1 and 2 present the comparison of the Fermi 2 site specific spectra and the spectra obtained from the THS time history for the EW and the NS components. Tables 1 through 4 present the information contained in Figures 1 and 2 in a tabular form. ~g w. ..-r --vc-w c-y --my,.+ m.,* w y.r,r -.ywy--,,-,.w-.-..- g,c.-.-- -., -, w y.-y-- w,

....-u.-.- Attachment "A" SLS(NI)-70 Pcgn 2 of 7 11-10-81 Project No. 6139-38 November 10, 1981 .s ~ somesus, ces e a a m u u to u 3

c....

1 - as nas is, ~ TH!- Q Comoc nent te

' l'e: m L Soectr a

, me SC "Le 4 1.5l- ' is y M b. IG U - to le LS LS p B. 18 L 4 A d g z e p I 4 - f f 5 %[>AMPh% =wr t a / ', g N g$. " T,. 4- ~% _,% DAMPI NG / V ~ ~

w/

~ JS - u D 3 m ~ \\ B - a bD

8 8 f n'ti a

e e n 3 e i e i eeii e n,, 2 m a a a a a y 2 3 ,e 3 s 3 gg ts gg fMmL lat. N O R.E. 1* R ES PONS E SPECTRA PO R. TH5 "Tl ME HISTORY - EW COMPotiENT ... a .**e g,....., ,.w-.,,,v.------,,-,---- ,--,,--...-.-,.----v----a-y-ar .-w-&-ee-----e

---g----------e v

m-r-

.u _. a. _ ___.__2_ .. ~ CLS (NI)-70 Attachmsnt "A" .11-10-81 Page 3 of 7 Project No. 6139-38 .v November 10, 1981 ~ O s a a u u u u J r,s.. g,

me ne TH1 NS Co:nooneh t

reJrr i Spectra tis as i 18 te 4 te to is ,' is O 4e a 10 13 ~ u na i ~ L5 L5 Lt to u .8 .8 j g .4 '4 l 6%, DAM Pil4C-- f } } ,J = 3 nwJ/- 7% omm s- )' ~ wY(s X#" E ~ i 3 3.-- g 2 . A p .tl ~ .15 1 I m .a A .m I e i n inne i e i i. ..ii nimi ,iin ie i i i ym,, A A A A A 3 J m J J 4 J .4 J L8 15 18 swet sa. FGURE 2 & RESkoNSE. SPECTR A F O R, THS TIMIE HISTORY - NS COMPONENT e e-+~---.-*...cv..-- -.-----,.w.,...-,-.-..+.,,,,.w.-,-.,,-,,,,--,,-w,----,- .--,e-,m.-..-.,m-w,_- -my-,- -.., - r---

^ '~ g.j.gj

. :.L... '

^ q ~ '. ~ CLS (NI)-70 Attcchm:nt A' 11-10-81 Pcga 4 of 7 Project No. 6139-38 t Table 1: 54 Damping Response Spectra Comparison Between TH5 (EW) ~ Time History and Fermi Site Specific Spectra Site. TRS/ Site FSEOUENCY Specific TH5 ' Specific (CPS) (g) . (G) Ratio 90.00000 .15000 16044 1.06960 34.48276 .15000 .18091 1.20607 31.25000 .15729 .18716 1.18990 27.77778 .17152 .19045 1.11035 25.00000 .t8534 .20767 1.12047 lll2. 22 22 2 .20211 .21877 1.08242 20.00000 .21839 .22360 ~1.02383 18.18182 .23425 .23581 1.00665 16.94915 .24666 .25055

1.01576 15.87302

.25885 .25231 .97472 14.92537 .27084 .26297 .97093 14.49275 .27676 .26588 .96067 14.08451 .28264 .27217 .96295 13.51351 .29138 .29067 .99757 .30002 .30940 1.03127 12.98701 ~ 12.50000 .30857 .31791 1.03027 12.04819 .31704 .31869 1.00521 11.49425 .32821 .33159 1.01031 10.98901 .33924 .33934 1.00031 10*.52632 .35014 .35780 1.02188 10.00000 .36350 .37102 1.02041 9.52381 ! .37688 .38427 1.01960 9.00901 .39040 .41797 1.07062 8.47458 .39312 41133 1.04632 8.00000 .39570 41012 1.03644 7.75194 .39712 42341 1.06621 7.51880 .39850 41277 1.03582 7.24638 40017 41398 1.03451 $.99301 40179 .42212 1.05060 S.75676 40336 43136 1.06942 6.49351 40518 41337 1.02021 6.25000 40694 42247 1.03815 5.98802 40893 43788 1.07080 5.74713 41084 42948 1.04538 5.49451 41294 41377 1.0020t 5.23560 41521 41663 1.00343 5.00000 41735 44533 1.06696 4.80769 .41925 45091 1.07553 4.60829 42127 44784 1.06308 4.40529 42343 47182 1.11429 4.20t68 42571 43318 1.01756 4.00000 42809 44811 1.04677 3.80228 42581 45003 1.05687 3.59712 40614 42059 1.03559 3.44828 .39176 41545 1.06048 3.30033 .37737 .39806 1.05482 3.15457 .36311 .37897 1.04368 .36418 1.04597 3.00300 .34818 '.35704 1.05690 2.89855 .33782 8 2.80912 .32811 .34855 1.06230 2.70270 .31825 .33623 1.05650 2.59740 .30764 .32014 1.04062 l 2 90000 .29777 .31210 1.048t1 j

- Op 4

-.=;. w....-__.__ _a_._--_s--------- ) SLS(NI)-70 Attcchment *A" 11-10-81 Paga 5 cf 7 yxoject No. 6139-38 Table 2: M Damping Response Spectra Comparison Between TH5 (EW) Time History and Fermi Site Specific Spectra ~ .~ Site. TBS / Site FREQUENCY Specific TB5 . specific (CPS) (G)

(C)

Ratio 90.00000 .15000 .15866 1.05773 34.48276 .t5000 .18013 1.20087 '31.25000 .15622 .15551 S.18747 27.77778 .16825 .18992 1.12878 25.00000 .17580 .20230 1.12516 22.22222 .19364 .21293 1.09961 20.00000 .20693 .21490 1.03853 18.18182 .21973 .22698 1.03301 16.94915 .22966 .24102 1.04946 15.87302 .23935 .24628 1.02896 14.92537 .24881 .25437, 1.02235 14.49275 .25346 .25763 1.01644 14.08451 .25807 .26544 1.02850 13.51351 .26488 .28210 1.06501 12.98701 .27159 .29661 1.09211 12.50000 .27821 .30500 1.09629 12.04519 .28474 .30932 1.08634 11.49425 .29330 .31627 1.07830 10.98901 .30173 .32737 1.08499 10.52632 .31001 .34330 g 1.10738 10.00000 .32019 .35519 1.10911 9.52381 .33018 .36478 1.10478 9.00901' .34040 .38863 f.14169 8.47456 .34310 .38346 1:11763 8.00000 .34567 .36191 1;O4692 7.75194 .34708 .37443 1.07881 7.5t880 .34845 .36982 1.06133 7.24638 .35012 .37543 1.07230 6.99301 .35173 .37790 1.07440 6.75676 .35330 .38254 1.08277 6.49351 .35512 .37492 1.05576 6.25000 .35688 .38013 1.06515 5.98802 .35886 .38278 1.06526 5.74713 .36077 .37511 1.03975 5.49451 .36287 .36986 1.01926 5.23560 .36514 .39094 1.07C64 5.00000 .33733 40625 t.10597 4.00769 .36919 .41141 1.11435 4.60829 .37122 40778 1.09849 4.40529 .37339 40407 1.08217 4.20168 .37568 .35909 .95584 4.00000 .37808 .38614 1.02132 3.80228 .37651 .38140 1.01298 3.59712 .36009 . 35497 .98578 3.44828 .34806 .35419 1.01761 3.30033 .33600 .34836 1.03677 3.15457 .32402 .33873 1.04540 3.00300 .31144 .32952 1.05804 2.89855 .30270 .32372 1.00943 2.80112 .29450 .31664 1.07519 2.70270 .28615 .30644 1.07091 2.59740 %27715 .29247 1.05527 2.50000 .26876 .27605 1.02711 A_,

....r-..=----

' ' ~

~ ~ 'SLS(NI)-70 Attcchmt.nt A" 11-10-81 Paga 6 of 7

Project No. 6139-38 Table 3:

54 Damping Response Spectra comparison Between TBS (NS) 't - ' Time History and Fermi, Site Specific. Spectra ~ -Site TE5/ Site raEOUENCY ,I Specific .'TE5 Specific (ces) . (c) (g) 3,gg, 90.00000 .15000 .18327 1.22180 34.48276 .15000 .16138 1.07587 31.25000 .15729 .16446 1.04558 27.77778 .17152 .17509 1.02080 25.00000 .18534 .18402 .99287 22.22222 .20211 .21398 1.05872 20.00000 .21839 .23405 1.07168 18.18182 .23425 .24620 1.05101 16.94915 .24666 .24908s 1.00980 15.87302 .25885 .26657 1.02981 14.92537 .27084 .28133 1.03872 14.49275 .27676 .29347 1.06036 14.08451 .28264 .30965 1.09555 13.51351 .29138 .31145 1.06889 12.98701 .30002 .30909 f.03024 12.50000 .30857 .32159 1.04219 12.04819 .31704 .34191 1.07845 11.49425 .32821 .34332 1.04605 10.98901 .33924 .35340 1.04175 10.52632 .35014 .35524 1.01457 10.00000 .36360 .37687 1.03650 9.52381 .37688 .39906 1.05884 9.00901 .39040 .39810 1.01972 8'.47458 .39712 .43113 1.09669 8.00000 .39570 43053 1.C8802 ~ 7.75194 .39712 .42970 1.08205 7.518EO .39850 .42035 1.054P4 7.24638 400f7 .40020 1.00008 6.99301 40179 .38079 .94774 5.75676 40336 40875 1.01336 6.49351 40518 .44103 1.08847 6.25000 40694 .44462 1.09258 5.98802 .40893 .41195 1.00739 5.74713 .41084 .43548 1.05998 5.49451 41294 .43105 1.04386 5.23560 41521 .45551 1.09707 5.00000 41738 .41722 .99961 4.80769 41925 .44477 1.06088 4.60829 42127 43901 1.04212 4.40529 42343-44046 t.04023 4.20168 42571 43995 1.03346 4.00000 42809 46987 1.09700 3.80228 42581 46314 1.08766 3.59712 40614 42357 1.04293 3.44828 .39176 .39454 1.00711 3.30033 .37737 .38226 1.01295 3.15457 .36311 ,37833 1.04191 3.00300 - .34818 .36942 1.06102 2.89855 .33782 .35627 1.05462 2.80112 . 32811 .34387 1.04804 2.70270 .31825 .32953 1.03544 2.59740 .30764 .31876 1.03614 2.50000 .29777 .31382 1.05388

..... -. -.-- - - - :-- ;;. ;.~.- T :. Ta' - ' : ~. '.. ~ ' - ' ~ ~ gLs (NI)-70 Attcchm2nt "A" 11-10-81 P go 7 of 7 Projcct No. 6139-38 ' Table 4: 74 Dcmping Response Spectra Comparison Between THS (NS) . 7

Time History and fermi'Sitelpecific S'pectra

"'~ ~~~ . ~. ,r,,. .. I. ' *, ~ Site TBS / Site g ecific ~ ~Til5 ' ~ Specific - Fa y p(C) (C) Ratio 3o.00000 .15o00 .18:43 s.20953 34.48276 - .15000 .15891 't.05940 31.25000 .15622 .16018 1.02533 27.77778 .16825 .17498 1.03957 25.00000 .17980 .18505 '1'.02922 - 22.22222 .19364 .21160 1.09275 20.00000 .40693 .23028 1.-11286 18.18182 .21973 .24170 't.10000 16.94915 .22966 .24691 1.07510 15.87302 .23935 .25958 1.08453 14.92537 .24881 .27265 1.09582 14.49275 .25346 .28635 1.12975 14.08451 .25807 .29787 1.15424 13.51351 .26488 .30272 1.14286 12.98701 .27159 .3052C 1.12374 12.50000 .27821 .31460 1.13080 12.04819 .28474 .32657 1.14692 11.49425 .29330 .33034

1.12627 10.98901

.30173 .33875 1.12271 10.L2632 .31001 .34751 1.12096 10.00000 .32019 .36312 '1.13407 9.52381 .33018 .37707 1 14200 9.00901 .34040 .38144 1.12057 8.47458 .34310 .40281 1.17403 8.00000 .34567 .39495 1.14257 ~ 7.75194 .34708 .39160 1.12828 7.51880 .34845 .36634 1.05134 7.24638 .35012 .35465 1.01295 6.99301 .35173 .34769 .98851 6.75676 .35330 .34314 .97125 6.49351 .35512 .36492 1.02760 6.25000 .35688 .36169 1.01348 5.98802 .35886 .33818 .94237 5.747:3 .36077 .37132 1.02924 5.49451 .36287 .38489 1.06067 5.23560 .36514 .39179 1.07297 5.00000 .36733 .36754 1.00059 4.80769 .36919 .36580 .99081 4.60829 .37122 .37330 1.00560 4.40529 .37339 .36962 .98991 4.20168 .37568 .40100 1.06740 4.00000 .37808 . 42103 1.11361 3.80228 .37651 .41408 1.09978 3.59712 .36009 .38458 1.06801 .3.44828 .34806 .36033 1.03525 3.30033 .33600 .34374 1.02302 2.15457 .32402 .34970 1.07925 3.00300 .31144 .34113 1.09532 2.89855 30270 .33019 1.09080 2.80112 .29450 .31779 1.07910 2.70270 .28615 .30327 1.05983 2.S9740 .27715 .28885 1.04221 2.50000 .26876 .27113 1.00880

Attachment B to: EF2-55,704 Supplemental Seismic Reassessment Information Structural Evaluation

s The reassessment of structures essential for shutdown is summarized in the Supplementary Seismic Evaluation Report No. EF2-53,332 dated July 15, 1981. This reassessment shows that the critical Fermi 2 structures will only experience stresses considerably below yield point levels. Figures B1 and B2 illustrate spectral differences between the TH5 (NS and EW components) time history and the time history on which the structural reassessment was based. Predominant structural frequency ranges are shown by hatched zones along the frequency scale. It is concluded that use of the THS time history does not change any of the conclusions of the initial struc-tural reassessment.

s,. SARGENTOLUNDY Attcchment aB" .. ~ g CNOINEERS PAgd 2 of 3 c= caco Project No. 6139-38 November 10, 1981 s SLS (NI)-70 11-10-81 hepsut. CPS

O 3

h 'M is 1, to te .3 ,Et.* s=== == s ie *

isi e

i i = =i-to me ase ed ~

a. :

4,, 48 las ( ~ s. 15 4 t 18 ~ lt le ~ ~ 15 ~ L5 (g , 19 t2 G ~ m ".s,, 8 i 1 = g I 1 *s ? en i < a t 5 J Ts5 (E-w) 3{s w- -_ p [ TH7( E-w ) I 3 h 4 ,,,/) s- ~ 2 7 ~: n x b. ~ ~ .d .38 ri P'7, a } /4/ e J 8 x v.ji, i 4 l(. /V, 4 \\ ~ k /// ,ii, 4= .= .= a 2 s i, i, i, I FIGURE B l: ""/ */o DAMPlNG SPECTRA FOR EW COMPON ENT I L .emum e e me

m. D D

h o-_.

CARGENT & LUNDY AttacP ent " B A GNOINCEQD Pcge.' of 3

C848CAGO Projcet. ::o. 6139-35

LS (NI)-70 November 10, 1981 11-10-81

+ m' o m a u' he u to to a ,3, ag_ l l El

14 r

i .u ci - i L9 _ ,SE CB 48 i u it I l l i u

4. -

is ~ le p= b. it It t, ~ g p. O 10 '11 i i os l a e e .3,, la t q

r. -

I 'i I i -i 3s is 3 rs7( n-s; I i -i Y .i 2 ) /- rus(s. s) J ~ J /* ~ l A x l 5 -.n .I 1. m I g d m 3 (, \\ (jj t -n m f/ \\'/./- l 4 m Ij /.s/ ,/ i / it,e i,,, A A A A A .as .1 .15 J J A J A J 1 LS 2 Serbs, Ser. s i F 7% DAMPING-Sf'ECTRA Fo R. 14 5 coM PON E N T n..--JGURE g,7. ; e

~ U Attachment C to: EF2-55,704 Supplemental Seismic Reassessment Information Equipment Evaluation

a. The detailed evaluation of the Fermi 2 items included in the Seismic Reassessme'nt using 55 damping rather than 75 structural damping identified no additional items requiring' reevaluation or replacement. A tabulation and the detailed evaluation summary infor-mation follows.

i TABLE 5.3-1 LOADS FOR CERTAIN RPV AND INTERNAL COMPONENTS l IIorizontal Vertical Allowable Top Guide (Shear) 350 31.7 687 kip (1) I Core Plata (Shear) 347 361 687 kip (1) Stabilizer (Load) 513 0 2,765 kip (2) l, RPV Support (Moment) 221,000 N/A 1,152,000 in-kip (1) l RPV Support (Shear) 679 1,191 2,600 kip (1) CRD llousing (Moment)

507 N/A 18,870 in-kip (2)

CRD Ilousing (Shear) 14 Negligible 4,400 kip (1) CRD ' Rest.raint Deam (Load) 14 N/A 266 kip (2) 1j', ? Shroud Support (Moment) 276,000 N/A 347,900 in-kip (2) U U Shroud Support (Shear) 1,176_ 1,031 1,434 kip ( 2_) Fuel Assembly (Homent) 12,024 See Section 32,200 in-kip 5.3.1 Fuel Assembly (Shear) 250 See Section 687 kip 5.3.1 j.1' I (1) From Fermi 2 mathematical model 761E774, Revision 4 [j (2) From equipment design spec. or analysis fiki GMM S4 A14 }/M 4M 1 Nf l- ?'Il

/,2z 7 t,/7 : Fran~"~

b*M 7 ?*

go.yk 'c hhn yordf de' a,yidy/ ems 4 E7 rfmchm/ byy eHocabbr o k.

pH/ i r

f f fj l TABLE 5.3-1 (Continued) 1 LOAD 3 FOR CERTAIN RPV AND INTERNAL COMPONENTS I Vertical Horizontal Load Force Force Plant Combination (kips) (kips) l Core Plate LaSalle 1 El 423 471 Fermi 2 New Seismic 361 347 h i l Top Guide LaSalle 1 B2 40.8 332_ lf Fermi 2 New Seismic 31.7 350 1 ~ Y Load Combinations l El = NL + (U - Delta P) + SRV + SSE l D2 = NL + (A - Delta P) + Chq. + SRV - 1 + SSE r cah(le / 7s Ga,We,4,e.es are 6esefe,ph.rme 4 e e,4uptejgm.r 44hl w <eW <3 yaa/ 6 7xye'e# Afe aq//dcsead;4bv. ! 14 mia,nu, Aw &pude.mA/ *&* h en4thWe/ i' 7 a M <> /o m k n a s.- Nkcebde 7o/4 h 3 N P Meim $m 4s y,,eej a 7 f,3c 7 4 TPaSe >g/ 3SDC' 7) ~ a s 1 "fMl. g// //en.r O. k.

s TMtz 5.3-2 ITYDRAULIC CONTROL (fMIT I SEfSMIC Rf-EVAf.tfATION SitMMARY TADt.E ,\\ Method of Original System, structure, component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results the serlpt ion Cenclusion and Remarks n g Spectra t Analysis Pergin Test Analysis Report I Spectra l Coniparison Marcin Report I of Fig. 8 Safety t Ivydraulle control Unit, X DRr 147-55 CIE dated 11004 DRr 147-1300 ( The new peak response f MI'L CIIDn0I CllD001-D6 4/18/72 ilof lf C110001-eldk lzon-spectra curves were N*S-5 D29 vertical

zontal, N*5-SA tal 1.05 g's horizontal capa-5004 bility of the itCU la 5004,I D30 D29 &

iuttl ' Vokfleal

- q's = 1300% margin by C6 D30 C16 dated cal test, horizontal All dated 4/17/81 4/18/72 Itorizontal

,ver ca) w ok test = 500% marq1n, y e therefore the llCUs are l{i e AW Te, dy JM 4 /*2 7yeq/er> uwkum Alad en<p&#mNons } &o, t e e d 6

R ? g TAh S. 3'-3 f, RitR PUMP ANC110RS SEISHIC 5:t-l' vat.tfATIDF Stie'ptAny Tant.E Method of Original Cystem, Structure, Component Qualli j ca t f ore De sc r ig.t lon Re-Evaluation Results Conclusion and Remarks Spectra t Analysis Fargin f ? Test Analysis Report I spectra f comparison Marcin Report I of rig. I Safety Rita Pump Anchor Bolts X Edison .15 g 5 s, L 1415% M/A The Anchor bolt stresses it a, Design

hora, report

6 a e J3'"

were recalculated by 1 1 Calcu- .10 g SDD-DECO on applying the new site-lation vert. -003 yield specific seismic loads, + Figures the equipment noeste 3 loads froes the attached C-11 piping, and the equip-mont dead weight loasis. L8 r flee shear and tennion b k [4f [(,,.[ stresses were combined g) ,r b and shown to be lede o /8rMMC//04([ een,;/ e' < (/. than the new allowable e...e., the,.f ,c, th. as,,

M,a;;* ': ,;;2=;";';*

/ .w o earthquake. e e O M

L A TA N 5.3-3A f, RitR llEAT ExctIANCMR AMD AMCit0RS SEISH f(- RE-tVA f.tJATints ElfMHARY TADt.E System, Structure, Component Method of Original Qualification tA scr ipt io's Re-Evaluation Results i concluelon and Researks g

9 Spectre t

Analysis Pergin Test Analysis Report i Spectra 0 Comparison Margin Report I of fl if ; Fig. I Safety at setA tteet Exchangor and X See O.E. 1.5 g a.4 n horts. 5% on N/A The stresses resulting h anchor holta Letter horts. D M vert, yield from the site specific !! e TDEC-4002 0.14 g dated vert. SSE were obtained by 6/22/81 multiplying the ODE

j.

allowable stresses (based on.75 C horia,.07 G i h verticall by the vertical P eir or 9t<qhke b/ 4' acceleration ratio and y ffi* c;7;;'1"1.iM' '#.'"*** i t.s // stresses due to riossle hl / h4, loads and doadweight were f! also increased even thou<h l-they didn't change. The d a I 5 A. /g ggg iM calculated stresses are less than the new allow. sul. vaiues, therefore. the equipment is qualifiel fo y'fa9t 9.Sc' '. C7 to the site specific SSR. l' # -2 Et/ y /, gg, e .c 7 h1 ' MA YlM ?>< TM #'dJ 4//% ,of e.y4Acm)%. o

.^ TAnu: 5.3-38 RCIC PUMP AMCIf0R BOT.TS SEISMIC RE-EVAT.UATIOf8 StmHARY Tang System, Structure, Component Method of Original Qualification Description Re-Evaluation Results Conclusion and Remarks ,}' f. f Spectra t Analysis Margin 4 Test Analyssa Report f Spectra 1 Comparison Marcin Report 8 of TJg. 8 Safety ,y NCIC Pump anchor bolts X Edison .15 C 5&L 609% N/A The anchor bolt stresses Design horia. report Tis'Tff'" calcu- .10 C SDD-Deco on were recalculated by applying the new site-lation vert. -003 yield figures specific seismic loads. DC-369 item 2 3 the equipment nossle loe4 C-11 from the attached piping, I and the eqtalpment dead tn gM M J/=' and tension stresses were a 4 weight loede. The shear La8 combined and shown to be ~ e puwet de fyd..Cod ** less than the new allow. O!e;;;;;;;t;;':!;;;ic-M. e Ifled to the new site-specific earthquake. j' e i b A

.m The,s.E 5.3-4 1 RCIC TURB1HF. AMC1 TOR BOLTS + SttSMIC Re-EVAL.tlATION EMAftY TAlif.E f Method of original System, $ttucture, Component Qualification Description Re-Evaluatica Results . Conclusion and Romerks t Spectra Analyste Pargin Test Analysis Report f Spectra 8 Comparison Maroln Report 8 of ( Fig. I safety 1 RCIC Turbine ancteor bolts x Edison 1.5 g Hors 8&L 25.6% N/A The new stresses were i filo No. .14 g report conservatively estimated (1C-369 vert. SDD-Deco by multiplying the or!- ltem 2 -003 ginal stresses by the Fig's largest acceleration in-3 crease comparing all 4. C-11 three directions. These / f new stresses are below y ,[f b *7 g the new allowsble values I .k( / ,N y W therefore, the equipment d W is requallfled to the nee G Fj'E W[?GRIN[ bt 2 site-specific earthquake. pggtfy'/ t///y /

9 Gk 7SNs s OW'O4D 2E)

{' s O e e t - - ~

Tant S.3-S .RCIC PUMP SUCTION STRAINER SEISHfC RE-EVAf.UATfote SitP4tARY Tant.E Method of Original system, structure, Component Qualification twscription Re-Evaluation Results ] Conclusion and Remarks t 4 Spectra t Analysis Mergin 1 Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra 0 Comparison Margin Report f sf rig. 8 Sa fety RCIC Pump suction strainers X Edison S g hors. S&L N/A N/A The new site-specifle II.estle) i File tio. 3 g vert. Report PIS I ESI0lD011 P1-2416 SDD-DECO earthquake accelerattene -003 are less severe than the Fig's. acceleration loadinge the. 3 were used in the original C-Il selseic quellfications therefore, this equipment is requalified. / f&M f Y ye,fieef eweiy[ wr. r/4ntyk n frcc/C>- k94 -/2$t )mt#1?ortow fon/ Qy.$kc bk s I i i l

m TAbt.E :. 3-6 Rft2 SE*.VICE WATE2 SETSMIC RE-EVAL.IfAttots i sttettanY TApr.E System. Structure, component Method of Original Qualification Dese 1ption Re-Evaluation Results Y, ]! Conclusion and Revaarks S \\ l Spectra l Analysla Pargin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra f Comssarlson Margin Report I of t: rig. I Safety Int 3 Cooling Tower R Harley Co. S&L 31% Ileases were found to tse .1 l Equip. No. 3:13560001A, dated [l U EMn-ITei# flexible and the resul-f 0, 2A, D 2-8-74 Seestion letlR 029950 on tant accoloration is Elevation 617 tornad alsove El'A. The piping s S& t. loads was found to be close EMn-011785 to rigid, l*llt stressas are very low, jr ator stresses are @very n. l Us I fow. Elll 3 tainers & climinafor retain ~ cts aru analyse.1 bdiic'I on-tornado loads (higher loads). .i i Stresses on the follow-Ing mechanical equipmert g Qg g dg and parts are [ Motor Support Drancis Arm Pipe Support Anchor Dotts Entsedmen t Tornado loads are go-verning loads. Stresses are within allowables. 18f12 S:rvice Water R Mcdonald SSL g Stresses are below I' ump and Motor E<lulp. No. Eng. EMD-yielding limits. Water til51C001A. C& D Analysts 029950 piemp and smotor quellfles locet ion Fillt da t eel to new response spectra. E lev.s t lose 590' 2-4-74 coulds t'n=p inc. s1.see I 9-71-75 (motor) Vor l'!are.pt to.nsent on yloid.

/f f Y ee A e A,s e. n a a & rec 6 e A sei u e ........-.4.

f..j

...egCt'ftV/U1-1 t 1 .A/[d/4.A:7 C F d5 5 0 /< J"A F / .u..e.... .a... ...a ...... pee... . 7bA..eI. ...a. r f. -... eux. . =. r y kst ress r i . //c s/ l l b[bren c e. i = i i . Seiswie she s s. = . o 7x ri g

. / f, C 7 i

- TeNe&. x Wy' marfor = .= 29.3 . o.7 ,e. n e s s f.. .. lS, 7 G nt-T M i +13 yGe? 9/7 A'M d*/ter M sy CC7 0 9" i 4 k/ / A h.S* 1 '..-...i . l.. 'l. g 4 l lj .1 { t y.. s l u g. s . p l 4 1 L. i i I .- 9. i 6 y.. -9_ I l ... i I l 4 l I 1 t { i e l o s l. i 1 i 1 i 4 I l i 4 i i a ~ [ I I, l l l l 8 l

1 TAlfat s.3-7 DIESEL CENERATOR COMPONEftTS FEISMIC fit'-EVAI.trA7 top ST_MAaLT* 9._ Method of Original

Systism, 5teweture, Componetst Qualificetion Description Re-Evaluation Results a

Conclusion and Pemarks j t ?; Spectra l Analysis Pargin 8 Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra f Compariso1 Marcin Report f . of i: Fig. O safety .g' Closel comerator X Colt Ind. S S L EMD-514

Stressee are well within Skid Assent,Ir Report 029950 allowables. Skid assen-L Equip. rio.

R30015001-4 dated bly quellfles to raw 'l 1.oc.a t ion RilR 4-4-75 Elevation 590' response spectra. [ Elevation 590' S&L t EMD-001659 ple;t Enclean9er X Colt Ind. S EL EMD-71004 8' The egelpment eteellflee i Stcck Assen.tsly Rotort 029950 to new response spectra. l LM Dgulp. rio. R10015001-4 . fated

8 Stresses very low.

f.oca t loss hfla 4-4-75 )$ Elevat love 590' c 55L EMD-I 001659 d rW [8 8 [ m;a;em Aa Pyh 'Ae/4 en.. m a TurtesefiereJer motsnting Isolts. hace.1 on aIIowalsIes se Frr attactement plate based ore allowalstcs

l s. 1 TA8. 5.3-0 DIESEL CENERATOR COMPONEMiS SEISMTC RE-EVAT.tfATifw A StWHARY TAftt.E i Method of Original 1. syttee, Structure, componerit Qualification tsseription Re-tvaluation Resulto l Conelvelon and Remarks

t' s

.l' i Spectra t Analyste Margin ^ Test Analyelo Report 8 Spectra I comparison Marain Report f of / Safety ) No. I I 3j Closel cenerator x colt Ind. [ Qg, 4 /0 S&L 174

Me equipeent qualifies Skid Piping Report Equip No. R10015091-4 dated f

4(/ 4 y[ f / [*9950 e EMD-emummmme to new response spectra. i t.ocation Rifn 4-4-75 Stresses are within l' Elevation 590' allowables. ti, I S&L 'I i EMD-001659 Jacket tieter x Colt Ind. Ut Espansion Tanks Report M M,$ est n e agulpment quellfles i 53t** EMD- 'I Equip. No. R1000A005-3 dated to new response spectra. /.4 N j tocation AllR 4-4-75 r 029950 Stresses very low. pp I Elevation 604' -2* ,r e a S&L

1 0

59 [' M dqq f Air Receiver Tank X Colt Ind. S&L 100t*** Me egulpment goa11 flee j Eipip. No. M1000A009-16 Report

/

EMD-e to new r*8Pon8' 8Pectra. i 1.ocation Rfin dated 029950 Stresses very sea 11. I Elevation 590' 4-4-75 i S&L END-001659 1 In piping based on i allowatstco i 88 ror muunsing flange la.nel on allowables ese gn Isolla leased on a I low. stiles

.. -. i. : ^ ~ 1=+- ~ 'Oh Y/Y ?/ h$10 -/bkrco::9ks guakr-Coo /er-Ol'&/// ft' 4 7 /o eny;ie-ifed GHJ%s &&) . z +.s c e s node' n.eGa.sy:<7'-ybc4.a Awamn s/ c s = -z o s y.,,- p A'fowa 4/e s 74ess z 7, o cop:/ i O ivs = .se pS j Ecd = 9-3 p.; - t E s 8G i l (2077): M76,osi <~ 2 7)oCopsl -zr l i i h e I 1 I i 1 0 i I 4 l l i l t 1 I 8 4 j i e

f, -J .- w TAnna S.3-9 f. DftSEL CENERATOR PUEL OIL SEtsMic 3.c-EVA1,1)ATrop r StlPttARY TABIE 1 1 r I Systeem, Structure. Cosiponent Method of Original t Description Qualification Re-Evaluation Results conclusion and Remarks t Spectra t Analysis Maroln Test Analysis Report f Spectra O Comparison Marcin Report 8 of Fig. I Safety i, i Fuel O!! Day Tanks Equip. No. R1000A017-20 X Colt Ind tm ation RftR Report N $$ g S gt. Isle Strees levels doe to re-l, I t t>to-tievation 590' dated I [*)y vised ros> pose spectra. 9950 4-17-74 did,PQ ,yh,*pf are within allowable j va lue s.- This component S&L 1e requallfled. EMn-i 001659 ! ts I b8 CD 6-d e For taisk holddown b its leased on allowables. i 4 0 e I e d 9

... :s..s=. +i::;.a w.. w =. ::, =. - -? =. / / D.G. 5e/WDa.WeiAs- . ;.dovermk .7< '7&.eb* n - JWe// dendf Wres.g o ~ j de$ G// fr4-e:s Ayor! ' l... l Afa#Om 3/res.s = 885 Cp:/ M} . ACCC).

f. / r. D A M f Y o [p e d r q.

._). //ert tv. s 27: . Mw l ew e.7 .za o- !. A/.s ts 7 3 S*C i -1.,. ,i l../+/.7 - 8856

20Ks'/

A'ccep tq llq V i....i / NZ 7 i 1 a y i 4 ? 8 q i j i t ~== l l 1 .I I. i e ,I l 8 e .4... i + l s 3 a e 8 I .i I. i s t 8 4 j j 0 t i = n n

,m TAILB 5.3-10 DIESEL CENERATOR f.USE OIL SEISHIC RE-EVAltfATION Stf>4tARY TAliLC e-Method of Original Systsa, Structure, Cosnponent QualifAcation Re-Evaluation Results i DeserIptioes Conclusion and Researks t V Spect a t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra O Comparison Margin Report 8 of ita Fig. f Safety t Lube Oil Stralner X Colt Ind, g p S&L

1. 0 t

Strese levels due to re-Equip No. R10015001-4 Report f f,yf EMD-vised response spectra j

location Rf!R dated y#8gg d .F. M. /p are.within allowable t' r. 29950 Elev.ition 590' 4-4-75 # N values. This cosoponent a ( is reque11tled. SEL 6 EMO-001659 W I e uw 4 a ror shell based on allow-ables. a l l l l l

.:..g _..:..:,-- 3 a v. u, 22'G. L'ude Oil Shiker ~ Gwenjn% eda., rdefsAc== (ed GM fyGes.s Jeprd)

,+/xvikei.rr%:= 98/9pi

/Sh/ian Obprmcy= 2rcpe L per-Aicee/ =. o 7p.'c 3cp3 cew y 5% .i dc< fem /Acce/= z.9f -37p; A4w ys' spa 9 8 l l~ 43C (9en) = /Z ksi /-/ccq&Lle /* W I ~~' (98/9_) : ' f 5 '/ y / ,qc' c_q,e 7q l /e c j ', 2. 4 l 4 i i I i I l I. 5 t 1 .~.. b i e s i I I i

~ p. 1 g TABLE 5. -11 t 8 [ DIESEL CENERATOR LtfDE O!!, l SEISMIC RE-EVA!.EIATION StfMMARY TABr.E , System, Structure, Component Method of Original Description Qualification e Re-Evaluation Pesults E Conclusion and Refearks 'p ^ t 1 Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analyalm Report 0 Spectra f Comparison Margin Report I of f Fig. 9 a Safety tastse 011 Filter

f K

Colt Ind. Equip. 100. R10015001 4 Incation RffR Report S&L M004* Strese levels due to re-Ulovation 590' dated EMO- = 6 vloed response spectra 4-4-75 029350 are within allowable' I values. This component is requallfled. EMD-001659 m sf b; h7 Aseef/ b f ?Y f"5N M4rk:sM p ,,s M 09 Gt i s%f?e H i For sliell I,ased on allow- .m e.. t [ A

f, e .{ TA%t.h S.3-12* f, DIESEL CENERATOR rUEL OTL i _Sf:f SMIC RE-EVAI.t'ATIOP8 _SUPP'AftY TJ Method of Original Sycten, Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Description Conclusion and Researks l Spectra t Analysje Marcin Test Analysis Report I Spectra f Comoarlson Marcin Report I of [ rig. I Safety r t Peet O!! Storage Tanks X Graver SSL -974 ( Additional bolts are Te= 'f Equip. No. R100A001-4 Tank & EMD-quired at the foundation Location itHR Miq. Co, 029950 support. All other cal-Elevation 590' < lated culated stresses are be-6-5-74 low allowables. S&L See Section 5.4 EMD-tn 000913 I 6 H L a ror foundation bolts base. remwe/ Ao rykm /c k % 'r$gah 'eAhn &cg.5'JL - c~QD Re -# CM W. n a (q /sr 570 M& crAufs e e

^ g. TMLR 5.3-13 EMEftCENCY EQUIPMENT COOLUto WATER SEISN!C ItE-FVAl.UATION StF7tARY Tant.f* Method of Original System, Structure, Component Qualification 4 Descrigtlon Re-tvaluation Results I Conclusion and Remarks i i Spectre 4 Analysis 8'a rgin Test Analysis Report f Spectra f Comparison Maro!n Report 8 of Viq. 8 },, Safety I RECW Puey sad Motor X Edison 1.41 hors. S&L 91 N/A For the equipment's crt-lincludes Anchors) r!1e No. .5 vert. Report uaned tical components the or!- ,m PIS f P4400C001A S24-116 SDD-Deco on ginal qualification used -003 3rigina' the vector sum of the ver-Figures allow-tical and horisontal B-31 ables accelerations as the [ [kk[ @/h Pf D-32 except equipment's seismic load-4f /' ENS 3 44# W( C-16 for pumi pse ing. The vector sum of i autboar-1 the N5, EW, & vertical f [.4[ f bearing. accelerations obtained C4#f4 hM [//7YM [$ $$ l from the new site-specifle [ See response spectra was di-d( F / e a remarks vided by the acceleration /s* pgyAgg $7 M /g $47/h@/q valuta used in the original j qualification to deter-f Ia j jg/62

qy mine the " acceleration C ggffqg ffgllP// /d 8) Of

/ increase *. The new / / stresses were conserva-gg/g NJ'r # h $ rig a gina ( stresses by this

accel-eration increase *. These

/#Jw3p new stresses are below [Ih * ,/ay emp the new allowatele valuest r# JP / n e however, the gnsep outboand j bearing radial load [# (87268) is 404 greater e than its original allow-able load rating of 62159 N4 F 9/"% - V QM g/AWWday at 100 hours of operatfor6 / When a hearing is sub- / e e lected in a conatant load g / Qfs MMe i;rcater than i t s ra t eil load, the lica r i ng I l f e is r e. luce.l. For a cinnatant laaa r t og In.id of G D 61 It to e,t laat e d I hat I her t= aring I l f a* wenild be re-duced from Inn hris to in I=, urns

p. m TAILk s.3-13 (continued) EMERCENCY EQUfPMENT COOLING WATER SEISMIC RE-EVAL.tfATION ~ s Efl_'HAEE IAOLE Method of Original System, Steweture. Comtonent Qualification I**IPLI'" Re.tvaluation Resulte ', { Concluelon and Remarks n <, g Spectra t Analysis Margin if Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra f Comparison Margin Report I of Fig. I Safety '.,') ]' - RECW Pump end Motor

ti (includes anchors) however, the selsste

-{ Pts fraenoconta loading is clearly not constant but occurs for a .i maximum duration of 30 'i seconds, therefore, The equigment is requalified to the new site-specific earthquake. i8 o 0 4 5 i t 1

g .A TAQt,b 3-14 EMERCEMCT EQUIPMENT COOLING CATEQ _SEISHIC Rt"-EVA!.ttAttop _StfMMAhY TADt.E Systesi, Structure, Component Method of Original tAserjption Qualifleation Re-Evaluation Results Conclusion and pesarks Spectra t Analysis Fargin Test Analysis Peport f ' Spectra O Comparison Marcin Report I of r + IIo* 8 8efety E800 Make-up Lank l lincluding anchor isolts) X Edison S&L S&L N/A The original seiselo p PIS OP4400A001 File No. Report Report a mes S20-24 S L-2 6 82 SDD-DECO ma yie1< stresses were separated l., Figures -003 out of the original + D-31 Fiqures qualification, increes'ad l. B-32 8-31 for the new site-specille D-16 D-32 earthquake, ered then adfel C-16 to the original normal gn operating and deadweight I loads. The new stresses gg g $$ fg)g@ are below the new allow. a" able valuess therefo,re, w the equipment is requal-Afied to the new site-gge:y g j specific earthquake. 4 1 t. i t

h{W / ? 8 Yy 7 / 2 !. A Fh 8 8. /ocq hon ll2S ' ~ " ' ~ ' ~ '. p ; 4 f o - l a. g y, ~ f/H Yed Ay = li2 'fyo, f : A 7.6 3C) + To t ? tl =

3. 6G i

fus = /s2S( 6) f < 38

7/

.f.aw =/.2s(9e 1,38 . =. - !?B Press.rgmniaq 3 cc(3aso)-/. 7/(WW -f 48 Cc090 3 3,8. < 3 7,7 % S t i r'TGCO =- j I, l W h c e 7 k I [C r 1 i j _. 1 s' .i t f f i - j l i t 2 i I

i

[ TAnLE 5.s-15 1 l EM'EftCENCY EQUIPMENT COOLING WATER SEISHlc PE-EVAL.tfATION t SitettAftY TAftt.E 5' Muthod of OriqInal l' ',Sy0 tem. Structure. Cosaponent Qualification Re-Evaluation deputto Dee.:s ipt ton Concluelon and Romerke 9 i Spectre i Analyslo Pargin Test Analyste Report i Spectra I Cosnpa rison Marcin Report I of i Fig. I Safety j j SectfIleat enchanger X Edloon S&L S&L 29 M/A The new stresses were coe. I (12cluding anchor bolte) rile No. Report report aset servatively estimated by PIS SP4400nn01 S21-7 SL-2682 SDD-DECO on multiplying the original l rigures -003 ylend stresses by the largest g Figures acceleration increase com-li B-31 paring all three direc-.. i B-32 B-31 tions. These new stresse C-16 8-32 are below the new allow-j C-16 able valuess therefore, the equipment le roquall-ut fled to the new ette-dpe-e cific earthquake. s tn 1 1 / / j. de ee arks S sw amre W e I 1

., ea ... = .e.. -me.- 4 ,.m ( / / / VV f 22 SCO2.'*./V?)~ c. ~ .. Decp,n co-, A ' 2 o p 6 m A y f N W **' /b! 7 E.T S = & CC'O i s Y / Of l' W f A i i .. $./d d/^1k '+1. _e rG QSS2.r.5 Mser T fc:3 .,3 ( 3%,eG7 < ?Sjo x jn i 24 t.70 = a j e e a c c e,,nG be'.

~

'kjem o n e j 4.. t l 1 t a I. ? .. 1 i 4 i g i 1 e l I t i e I, 6 4 e 8 a s- ..e-.. ~.- -... -. ~ ~.. .~== * ~ ~. ~ l 1 1 1 6 l. j t 1' l i i ..!....._._4 4 e i I l l l 8 0 j i i t i i 3 i 4 -.... _... a.. ..........i-.

-~~

1 { I e t e ~~~4 - ~ ~ ~. ~ - s 3 e e 3 i e 4 I i i .g* ~.. . =* i

,m f tau t.E 5.3-16 DIESEL CENERAT0ft SERVICF. WATER SEISMIC RI'-EVAI.teATION SUPMARY TAf9f.E l Method of Original Systce, Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Description Concluelon and Deserke t Spectra 4 Analysle Pargin Test Analysis Report i Spectra 0 Comparison Margin Report 8 of Fig. 8 Safety Motor for Dieset X Allis SEL 20t* Stresses are within the, i cener.stor Servico chalmers EMD-e allowqble llette. water s. umps and dated 0029950

totor quellfles to new einergency cepelpment 5-13-75 response spectra.

Equip. No. R) OOC 005-8 location RIIR S&L M 4%) Og I / # g Elevallon 590' EMD-f hdh J*fdXl NNe*1 003791 4 g f* Diesel Cenerator Service X [f } N(g7 j8$ Hater Purage I g j See Section 5.4 f feenhb4. EPA /*lR m For anchorage botte based l on allowalsles.

^

khE,P'"3dL' ykm A je anm/;/m reyaMm is coo i i/ep ax zz x c 0.A 8eS7s Orck Em-i m m +

n TAME 5.3-17 EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT SERVICE NATER SEISMIC RE-EVAT.UATIOt* StiMMARY TADT.R Method of original Syctes, Structure. Cosoponent Qualification Ro-tvaluation Results DeserIptton Conclusion and Remarke i; e Spectra t Analysis l'argin Test Analysis Report 4 Spectra I Coinparison Marcin Report 8 of Fig. I Sa fety e-apergency Equipment Service X Mcdonald /N I S&L EMD-434* Stresses and deflections W.a t e r Pumg.s Equip. No. Eng. Rep. jN gI I 029950 are below allowatiles. P4 50X002 A, 8 I4scallon RilR IME-229 M, ,/ Pump quellfles to new Elevation 590' M4 Q[* - j og response spectruis. 7 5 &Wg1, &/Ok* '5 SsL t'M D. f 001554 Motor for Diesel Generator X Allis /7g S&L EMD-20t** Stresses are within the

Service teater pumps and Chalmers 029950 allowable !!mits. Motor 4

emergency equipment . lated Equip. No. R100C005-8 5-13-76. M 2 g,y quellfles to new response 8' spectra. Inca t i ues RitR

' EN [/

t. Elevatton 590 I' D-M.A y[se Cr%C:s QY 003791 9

h./I

4Jf,

.":2

In staaft deftcetion based on allowable.
- For encleorage isolts leased on allswaleles.

.e. TA~.th S.3-18 CONTROL AIR SEISHic Re-EVAT.UAttow l suertARY Tant.r Method of Original System, Structure Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Desculption Conclusion and pesarks 1 spectra t Analysis Pargin Test Analysis Report i Spectra 0 Comparison Marain Report I of Fig. f Safety l Control air compressor and X Edison-SLL SLL 1894 N/A The new stresses were cov> motor File No. report report TITEP servatively estimated by I (including anchor bolts) 011-179 SL-2682 S DD-Dr.co on multiplying the original PIS I F5002D001 D11-506 rigures -003 yield stresses by the largest 3-29 rigures acceleration increase D-30 3 comparing all three diree-C-16 C-11 tions. These new stressas f e are below the new allow-7 V NN N 'J J g g able valuesa therefore, the eqqipment is requalt- / ( fled to the new site- /g '/ / Qgg specific earthquake. ,9 h i 4 4 e

.m. m TAntz 3.3-19 CONTROL AIR AFTER COOTER SEISHIC RE-EVAL.UAT1068 SUPPt%RY TAfM Method of original

System, Structure Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Resulto Dese 1ption Conclusien and Twrke 1

Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report i Spectra I comparison Marain Report i et Fig. 8 Safety Control alt after-cooler X Edison 2.4;g hors S&L N/A N/A The new site-specifle ,'t (including anchors) rite No. 1.9 g vert report earthquake accelerations FIS IP50020004 011-405 son-Deco are less severe than the -003 acceleration loadinge Fiqures that were used in the n-29 original seismic qualif t-n-10 cations therefore, this C-Il equ!!acnt is requallfled. gAty m a.- Jo e % eachhAL-u. a w~ 3.) gar p,. m.e /rTh 7 l/ar # ::!'h

*2 e %< V 70 7/ ems Terb fM 3' 'cca U

(

l TADLi. 5.3-20 1 MWML ATR SEISHIC RE-EVA!.11A71098 t StfMHARY TABI.E g Method of Original j . System, Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results j tueript ion Concluelea sad Remarks i i f i Spectra t Analysis Pergin Test Analysis Report i Spectre f Comparison Margin Report I of Fig. I Safety

}

Control Air neceiver X Edison S$L S$L N/A N/A The new alte-speelfie PISfr5002A001 ri t e No. Report Report earthquake acceleratione } SL-2682 SDD-Deco-are less severe than Figures 003 the acceleration loadings D-5 Figures that were used in the B-6 B-29 original seismic qualifi-D-29 B-30 cations therefore, this a-30 C-11 C-6 equipment is reque11tled. i i %gg J' k, ts ~7Eg7g ~ i. 77 u i r1

Y ~ E' * '

Verf ~ <7O h' ib W 4 Te IC l l l e

t t l ll d 1c n ta. s

i c: f k

ucl d id. a~ c i re mnr e m seIa".p e ut s D aes. s d e. 'i e d l n a e t a aoci ti mtI a: s .~,e no fet o u h t. " h i dg t su y ih : l eset oo c vtw "t n rn.' o u e d. d ;* s m n t. eI Amd.ulS C oo tf8 f n y i t sf gf e i*% e trof s e a s P S d& t l s u aI n s l eMe e et R yr e l o r n ap f v o ne i AN I t V# % a u p d l i A, IMY a c t v tr E a M u

I' e

R n epN e W ao t 0 rsI 1 ti J T cr. eag ,s M s A f. ppi t f t. 1 I B SmF r t 2 S A A o T C i T V_ d 3 C E 5 D E, R .n ff U eb Y 8 R A O

. n.

I M S c C H a y A c t r P V A i t i e I y+ a T S e T l p M M{a

c E

a S t S n in go i ii f rt t Oa r c o e f, fi p of e ? i R dloa t,f h, f /*. hu s g tQ i e s M y fa3 f4 X l s a 9 n A tseT tnen = o pn so C n ,o ei rt up ti

r tuc e s o

t e t SD co D m r* e C t A s v y fI S i i

p g .m m tab 5.3-23 ESSENTIAL l!VAC DAMPERS Sf'ISHIC RE-EVAI.tfATIOP8 Stf**HARY Tant.E Method of Drlginal System. Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Resulte Dusesletloss Concluelon and Remerks t Spectra t Analysis Pargin test Analyelo Report 8 spectra I Cceparison Marcin Report I of rig. 8 Safety SEL S&l. Report Regort SDD-Deco-Edison SL-2682 003 r!!e No. Figures Figures PD 300 Pire Damper X 09-2175 n-37 n-37 74 N/A The original setseio C-19 C-19 'Tasco stresses were separated on out of the original yield qualification, increened j for the ette-specific sackdraf t Daeq=r X 89-2175 B-37 8-37 1R N/A SSE, and added to the tracific Air Prodesete C-19 C-19 .a u e y Company) pormal operating loade on ort-(in cassa where stresses !ginal were low, the combined us 4110wa-normal operating and o5 ble seismic stresses were ea increased by the worst Air Dampor x B9-2175 8-37 B-37 tot 7% N/A acceleration ratio). Iracific Air Products C-19 C-19 EJacu calculated stresses are Coa.pany) on ort-below the new allowable ginal valuees therefore the allowa-equipment is requalified ble to the alte-specific SSE. Plexible Isose X 89-2175 B-37 B-37 large 1 N N/A C-19 C-19 d( k [ dh (S I h o, laa / e y/I k knx sh-4 man .ng SkNy m ri,y 9 9

.....:. =,;. ;;; ;.,., ; / . C. F/) yoo Fi'R a' D 4 k o &~' ~ ~ GofWhs ' Y e ~~ 8 5.~5'O.b k r Y k 0rW.he~5 /7 ~~ j S 4 M &f'/rJ16/m.D8:E 5 ,9 D 7 ~ --.2 E c 1 N > % / /-* . E T h 2 3 S /.S .<16 GyFOM R./1 4G. e/er~.7770n 4 f G A $. b r / Y o 't k h -.- f /Kiex/Aiw+1,rs.o re d :/'er acc2/ era lM fGtk. 8 k Sib,. E. A_fhtyh 20sb ^ 78(0h /S = 7 / / ' V Ef.h C [* Sf's i ...<cW. // / $*;it,U'7-SC T W 7 i _..L. s ...n 1 -..h/A h/:MPEK s. f + e e. .a .ge. I ..M.ty//:rtpor Of~ T PCs. C 7~ 3D 5~N5/.. ,9 s j -e l~ 4 1 ' he d:.o 74 -r % re m ezu ~,r-4:/. g, ee,eri Qcc es,,...... /.. .. -. s.. - _/ e.:7.non n'c/.:r. i y.:<qm f

/

Wl~ i ' ~ g- . g,. i I A

V-WM

Bl* 2/7) Y

'C f) 628) f '28

31/0B i

~ .s - N : ' jo a _ 'l f S*8 2 = 2 M3 ri... o i 3,/g/ .a._ ...__. 7 4._.___ ._..... '......_i Cr . 2.s. y: 4 i i i. 4 /" 74 J f -v =.. .. /.' . V 78 ~ /..d ~5. 5.~. 3 i /s / i I g 4 j 7/Tss :

7. 'Z %St c G,Q ks'/.. i.d.

,c eW n 54i4 e/ ,.....c.___.... j l .3. _.i._ i I r l i g g i.. I i % 1. ._{ i l r ,i i._..... i i i J.. l l I 1 1 .3 I i l .s t l i. a t l I l 1 1 I

p l .TADLE 5. [. 3 (Continued) { l ESSENTIAL ltVAC DAMPERS SEISHIC Pf'-EVAT.UAf tet* SUPHARY TADf.P Method of original Systose. Structure. Creponent Qualification Re-Cvaluation Fesults i Desetlption Conclusion and Remarks g Spectra l Analysis Fargin 'ol Test Analysis Report I Spectra O Comparison Margin Report 8 of rig. I Safety 3

Fire tAsagwes and Air Control X

89-2131 Test in-B-37 284 E~C N/A The original test lumper (Air Uslance Inc.) or put ac-C-19 response spectra envelops 'j D9-2175 celera-the new alte-specific M TAD IV tion of reponse spectres there-5 g mini-fore, this equipment is it mum requallfled. E D.saper Motor Nuntings for X Edison S&L Report S&L Report 46% N/A The new stresses were 7410nrl57A & D rile No. SL-2682 SDD-DECO- 'TTZlf3" conservatively estimated thau F163A & D Dai-217 4 rigures 003 on by multiplying the B-37 rigures yield original stresses by the g us C-19 D-37 largest acceleration in-j -J C-19 crease comparing all three directions. These new stresses are Isetow the new allowable valuess therefore, the equipment As requalified to the new site-specific earthquake. 'h I 7 : Damper htur Mountings for X Edison S&L Report S&L Report 4.11 v ' N/A The new stresses were T4500F070 thru F073 rile No'. S L-26 8 2 SDD-DECO-naned conservatively estimated D9-2150 rigures 003 on by multiplying the D-37 rigures yield original stresses by the D-38 B-17 largest acceleration in-C-1 D-38 creane comparing all C-19 three directions. These M' IN b / 8(d40$$ 1 4 crefore, tho eq=sipment 7 4 is requalified to the new e 4 88 (U7bd M 89 d "It*~*P'*III* **'th "*'I'* 9 Y' YI [NNQ g d gb(C CPdt ACMf< uwd fl* u'I" eso <t..i G F 30 ps %.t G 240 l yd 3.fs4 v1.n. .1J. L m A

r r' ^ TADLE 5.. 3 (Continued) ESSENTIAL IIVAC DAMPERS Sttstile RE-EVAI.ttATION t StmptARY Tant.E a Method of Original Systsse, Structure, Component Qual!!! cation Re-Evaluation Results 4 Desca lg.t lon Conclusion and Pemarks t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analyals Report i Spectra 8 Comoarlson Marcin Report I of l Fig. 8 Safety Q } Fire Dampers X Edloon S&L Report S&L peport,jj N/A Tne peer' stresses esere T4100F099 & Fl92 File No. S h-26 8 2 SDD-DECO-Isa sci conservatively estimated 74100 Fist & FII2 D9-2184 Figures 003 on by multiplying the T4100F086 B-37 Figures yleid origins 1 stresses by the C-9 B-37 l !argest acceleration in-B-38 crease comparing all C-19 three directions. These new stresses are below the new allowable valueet therefore, the equipment is reguallfled to the new g site-specifle eartlequake. I si eS tit Wutterfly Dampers (Valveel X Edison S g (N-8) S&L Report

13. 2 4 Pt-J5 N/A las above) m Type 4140 D.smper File No.

5g (E-W) SDD-Deco-nasco Sites 8*, IO*, 14 *, 18 ", D9-!!19 3g (Vert) 003 on & 48" Figures yield D-37 B-38 C-19 E Manual 43r D.ampers X Edison S&L Report S&L Report 16% N/A Ttie original selssile Sizes File No. SL 2682 SDD-DECO-td 7 stresses were separated 32 x 30 n9-2176 Figures 003 on out of the original quall-96 x 24 n-37 Figures yield fication, increased for 48 m 48 D-18 n-37 the new site-specific i 16 m J6 C-19 11-38 I cartlequake, and then added o s'<An C-l V to the original normal e yder s'h *mn* a**'s !~ !Y M *- I'1',;"*d"c'":t;'2 W~4ctr./S-s% sedM*. -

'iMi"'"fu"*"th-e-Ms u d, fore, the cegulimient is g {,;

E EQa aONY# T I te'luattricJ to the new p p 4 site-speelfic earttwiuake. 7J0n4 5D7I s --a

l, J a* 4 TABLR S.. 23 (Contixued) g f_ ESSENTIAL IIVAC DAMPERS SI".lSMic RI-EVAL.tlAT E StfMMAftT Tant.E Method of Original System. Structure, Component Qualification Ite-Evaluation Resulte Duseription concluelon and peinarks Spectra Analysis Pargin Test Analysis Report I spectra I comparison Marcin Iteport I of l Fla. I Enfety Type CD31 naispers X cdison 8&L 8&L Report 45% N/A The new stresses were ) 75" x 52" thru File No. Report SDD-DECO-IdWd conservatively estimated 3 l 16" x I6" n9-761 SL-2682 003 on by multiplying the rigures rigures allowa-original stresses by the i n-37 U-37 ble largest acceleration n-38 n-39 huck-increase comparing all C-19 C-19 ling three directions. These load new stresses are below the new allowable valuess therefore, the eqqipment is requalified to the new site-specific earthquake. b

l2* a 33' Control Rooms X

edison W (N-5) SSL Report 162 N/A (as abovel W Dampers P!le No. Qg (E-W) SDD-Deco-base ""'"g (Vert 1003 on 09-761 f. *> rigures yield D-37 n-38 C-19 Firo nampers X edison Qq (NS) S&L Report N/A N/A The new alte-specifle l'ISIT4 t HOF File No. 'g g (tM) Spu-DLCo-earthquske accelerat!One 09-2090 '.. n g (Vert 1001 are less severe than the rigores acceleration loadings Il-17 that were used in tho l Il-18 original scismic qu.slif!= j C-15

.ittons therefore, this i

f ff f/. V 'v' ISN $? 4 % v' n o z. e:7 1

Tant. i.3-24 livAC nETunN AIR FANS Sr.1SMIC RE-INAl.1)ATM SIN 8 MARY TAftl.E E I t Method of Original Systeen, Etructure, Cumponent Qualification Re-Evoluation Results j Duscription Conclusion and Remarks l S Spectra t Analysis Margin I Test Analysis Report i St.*ctra O Cornpa rison Margin Report i of i l F rig. I Safety I Return Air Fan X Edison S&L Report S&L Report weakest N/A The new stresses were conservatively estimated tincluding Anchor Bolts) File No. SL-2692 SDD-DECO-compo-by multiplying the FISIT4100C0J1 D9-365 Figures 003 nent B-37 Figures has a original stresses by the 3 B-39 D-37 On largest acceleration in-C-19 B-30 margin crease comparing all three C-19 based directions. These new on stresses are below the new yield allowable valuess there- /, fore, the equipment le p requalified to the new i Q h N $4@@ kD .41te-specific earthquake. un I m O 4 e

^ s s f $&f l hll S YN M r. un. Ahla. . f. 4 8 h '-' ' ' 6 e 9 / / // art lfCf3 W&br : 2A E Cp3 7 i l i !(.p':.cc/. f

. NS: .707 y i..

( 3.:.. 7 I i s Ve d: /. ssy 's l ? /< 7 . j I 88 3 0. 3 k s's < <ef l 2/ 7 = .c 3.. i a l a h ( 4 i i I l .t 4 I e e + S .4 . -emeue a ..,e, e a_ g S e E 6 9 e o e e m = =w.. g 9 f l j i I 4 e e e e t e f U 9 S er a y-w-, --. i-. - y-u

,q e 4 TA. S.3-2$ IIVAC CLNTRIFtR;AL Cll!LLING UNITS SEISMIC RF-EVAI.UATION SUW1ARY TARI.E l Method of Original System, Structure, Component Qualltfeation Re-Evoluation R$sults DumerIption Conclusion and Romerks 4 Spectra t Analysis Margin i Test Anslysis Report 3 Spectra 8 Comparison Marcin Report 8 of Fig. 8 Safety t 1 Centrifugal chilling Units X Zdison S&L Report S&L Repost, 7 N/A The new stresses were (Includos Anchors) File No. S L-268 2 SDD-Deco-14 sc conservatively estimated PISIT4100u008 & 9 B9-653 Figures 003 on ori-by multiplying the D-37 Figures ginal original stresses by the D-38 B-37 allow-largest acceleration it.- i { C-19 B-30 able crease comparing all three C-19 directions. These new stresses are below the new allowable values there-i W fore, the equilment is 3 requallfled to the new ette-specific earthquake. Rupture Dise for X

Edison, 10 g input S&L Report 21004 N/A The original qualification Cuntrifugal Chilling Units File No.

SDD-Deco-Indicates that the disc i D9-684 003 was subjected to a 10 g Figures input. This acceleration D-37 is well above the new D-38 site-specific response C-19 spectras therefore, the equipment is requalified gj [h M4h?/d$f Q j to the new site-specific / earthquake. [ e e e e e t

Tall [l: 5.3-36 ..s IIVAC CMr.RCENC) MARE-Ut' HOTORS i SE1SMIC RE-EVAf.t'ATION l i StrPHARY Tant.E I Method of Original i l system, structure, Component Qualification Re-Evalustion Results Duscription Conclusion and pesarks r 4 Spectra t Analysis Fargin l Test Analysis Report B Spectra 8 Comparison Margin Report I of rig. I Safety D=argency M. eke-up Motore X Edison S & I. S&L N/A N/A The new site-specific for Fans with PIS l's File No. Report Report earthquake accelers-tions are less severe 741000047 & 16 09-1196 SL-2682 SDD-DECO-than the acceleration Fig's 003 loadings that were used B-37 Fig's in the original seismic D-38 B-37 c-19 B-38 quellfications therefore, c-19 this equipment is requal-ifled. o a/vy5a e 'y myia Ce.e) he s yed A , i;enk.m $ k'cd lybn 4 vsf 91 e e

TADt.F . 3-27 f ~ IIVAC EMEHCENCY MAKE-UP Ah,tECIRCULATION AIR FILTERS UNITS SEISMIC Rr-EVAT.IfATrote SUP* MARY TABl.E = Nothod of Original System, Strw:ture, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Deserlptioss Conclusion and Researks t Spectra 8 Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra f Comparison Marcin Iteport I of Fig. I Safety f Eumorgency Make-up Pans X Edison S&L S&L 214% N/A The new stresses were PIS I T41000047 & 16 File No. Report Peport Taued conservatively estimated by multiplying the orig-B9-1387 51.-2682 SDD-DECO-on Fig's 003 Yield inal stresses by the B-37 Fig's largest acceleration in-B-38 B-37 crease comparing all three C-19 B-38 directions. These new stresses are below the new C-19 allowable valuess thue-fore, the equipment is requalified to the new site-specific earthquake. (n Im (J tame 9ency Make-up Filters X Edison rig's Fig's M N/A The new stresses were PIS I T4100 Doll File No. B-13 8-37 Dased conservatively estimated by multiplying the orig-89-762 8-14 8-38 on C-9 C-19 Yield inal stresses by the largest acceleration in-of of crease comparing all three SsL S& L directions. These new Report Report stresses are below the S L-268 2 SDD-DECO-new allowable values 003 therefore, the equipment g Nfh [ s t - pe e t um \\ /t(ma imum om *VM %4dns. 1 l l i l 1

~. Tr ~ 9 5.J-28 IIVAC MUI.TI-2ONE Cf.IMATE CllANCt:It setsntC no-tyAli_iAftoH

SUMMARY

_TABI.E Method of original System, $tsucttise, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Pesults Description Conclusion and Pemarks t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra 8 Comparison Margin Iteport I of Fig. I Safety 'f J Multi-tone Climate X Edison S&L S&L Weak-N/A The new stresses were Ch.ange r File No. Report Report est conservatively estimated PIS I T41000007 09-544 St.-2682 SDD-DECO-Com-by multiplying the orig. D9-674 003 ponent Inal stresses by the Fig's Fig's has On largest acceleration in-D-37 8-37 Margin cre.ase comparing all three D-38 D-30 pased directions. These new C-19 C-19 on stresses are below the Yield new allowable valulter therefore, the equipment is roqualified to the now sito-specific earth-quake. 1 tn I planum for IIVAC I Edison S&L S&L Weak- <% N/A The new stresses were Multi-Zone Unit File No. Report Report est conservatively estimated 89-2203 St.-2682 SDD-DI W com-by multiplying the orig-Flq's 003 ponent inst stresses by the D-37 Plq's has a largest acceleration in-D-38 B-37 On crease comparing all three D-38 Margin directions. These new C-15 C-15 Dased stresses are below the new on allowable valuess there-Yield fore, the equlgeient is requalified to the new site-specific earthquake. Flensam rasing X l'dison 8 & f. S&L I N/A The new site-spelfic Access (bor for File No. Iteport Itoport carthquake accelerations livAC Hisit t-zone Unit D9-2202 St.-2682 SDn-DECO-are less severe than the Pin's 003 acceleration lomitings D-37 Pig's that were used in the D-38 D-37 original solemic qualifi-C-9 n-30 cations therefore, this e C-19 equipment is requallfled. g. r. e g & d m/s.e ms O Mhimm a~sAb ~4'dy e.zr. zum acwhNe.

.. -.. ~. ~....... l e/ i. i 1 t l g . AfaOi -3me 8N'db. C$2+bret-I i s I I .___d~/ _.7 7.# [ _r,-_._.__._.8 .1. l i i k eff casle f/fl/ cjb7 ' 4/1phhkb+r = f oy i 82- ^ .I I .I.. i i t

/

409 28. 9 = FA 7krt.< . /.L./c__c. ~ I ..1 L. i +. /Gknem $d /%/A'k.%c /Ati [ I l i _ ~. ' _ .fs7dN &V.. E/. G8y'-C". ~ l ^ f .M"* - ) g c?qq/ rs reI'oW__._/._.._.ffr0WS f e m d.eSf/7 f y sigkt'm4O. $8C. F ' 2.3,72K$i. e.rs. O I l I ..f'Cgf75k =, / 2S i.. ._./. /W4rMt4 A f G.'t fQM,/ f/ .{. . j..

?3 7z(t.d = 2M?esik PIW - Map Ue s

f i s e i t 9 i i 8 ^ . t i l e I l i h I i l I l i e t. 4 i I

T s 4 ^ TAD $.J-29 I j IIVAC Cllit.l.ED WATP.R Pi!MP AND MCrrO2 SETSHIC pl*-EVAL.llATION SUPMAnY TADf.E i Method of Original System, St s uct ure, Cosiponont Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Description i Conclusion and Remarks t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report i Spectra 1 Comparison Margin Report 8 of { j rig. I Safety i. Ch!!Ied water Pump X Edison Pumps 8& L M/A N/A The new site-specific sed Motor File No. 3g N-S Report earthquako acceleratlons Pts I T4100C040 & 41 B9-651 3 9 E-W SDD-Deco-are less severe than the B9-1875 2 g vert 003 acceleration loadings rig's that were used in the MTn's D-37 original seismic qualifi-1 3 g N-S D-30 cations therefore, this 4.25 g E-4 C-19 equipment is reque11 tied. 3.6 g Voi t i J Nh ? l W j s Y y/Sy%Abn. = 4 suc t&+a w os e 0 6 0 e 4 d l I I

,i',' ' k, d-n2 o s lrar w dEoS k dao,edo r euf pel lS a tq Eotl ef m ca dS aahl c e i rl eStl tli R maas auw af ^ spnacmcotui d ieieirll eqc o n esgrf oaeree a s icinCborp ernc f s 1roiee.ees z n se ph rrie o i nwe,stsae t s i hn-d hti u gstoeoastns 7, l ie ittoe e c rsfti l ssme n osoasd s s ph z o e c egeeit c e r ti e d n rl u ht ufhditbqo Tsoit atsaet g n y k g i t gf e trof A a a / 2 p3 y f s P S i t l u sI M* s i e st R yr N l o n ap o ne i AR [ t P ? M/ pG m d au n d o l i e l / a g mne r v 4r oaoi E a l Y y 4 M n m e / R n L o ao 8t 4 o s O rsI fr 3 C 1z7 I ti D t :t s ht'; M s T cr. LrD e e t A 'I eag ,9 o-e O. I ppi 31 &pD3 s 1 I D Srnr T 1 ;e, 3 - eD0 s 3 A A o DCSRS0 3 t l t Q, o a t - s V T C f C c r. f 4 a Y l0 (//9 [' A t t 8 I p A 3 2c2 O C c P r 6t s O H a 8 8i M t n a f U t u i , 2re e 1 A C H S c 39 em [/ [ C o S T A S e 31t.Vi V X l p DCS( T [ b' a S I T / I S n r i n / go 8 4 ii o Mt M r rt t nN3 Oa r o 4 e c o se6 fi p il - e of e di9 i R rF8 ?. // dl oa Th[h hu s G 9 f. 4 tQ t e s t c a 7 f. M y S g/ E l X c T a 7 2 3 nA Q wS [ 8 ( t os I GW & t /: k seT 4 4 l ne o [6 n o o C s p rsr mo ero l es c n ol s ,o ooe Cor ei Cp rtup m m3 e o s o t ti oic& y cr ro l uc Ni149 u rs r l 0J2 v t e sD

a. pA000i cm uH0t qut 000 c e

h l' n000 e. m ep c e e twt 1 11 s t irn444 o s wI o7T7R y s S l' C( fe4 I i if j; i, ij1 i!

l ~ j TA6.o 5.3-32 RflR 3400M C001.EltS SEfSMIC pt-LVAI.UATION StrPHARY TART.E Method of original .'l l Systems, St ructure, C:amponent Qualificatfori Re-Evaluation Results j Dusca lpt ion T i Conclusion and messerks .6 Spectra l Analysis Margin I{ Test Analysis Report 1 Spectra f Comparison Margin Report I of

y rig. I safety iq

.I ment anom Cooler X Edison SEL Report S&L Report N/A N/A The new alte-specifie f (Incit=fing Anchor Botta) File No. SL-2682 SDD-DECO-earthquake acceleratione PISIT41000015 B9-554 rigures 003 are less severe than the l B-29 Figures acceleration loadings that n-30 D-29 were used in the original C-14 n-30 selsnic qualifications C-14 therefore, this equipment + P is requallfled. M N a g pQ mys'x 4m see/GWbMb. i

l

.\\ j 1 f L i t 1 l I

a p-. TP E 5.3-13 /==. i' IIVAC Equipment Room Fan-Coll Unit I SEISHic Rf:-EVAI.UATION 2 l-l SUPHARY TAB 12 l + Method of Original [ 4 System, st ructure, Compossent Qualification Re. Evaluation Results i j "****IP"I Conclusion and Demarks f 'g f-j Spectra Analysia Margin i Test Analysis Report I spectra a comparison Margin Report I of i Fig. 8 Safety 4 I i Equipment poum X F,dison SLL Report S&L Report ,))1 L N/A The new stresses were j. Fan-Coll Unit File No. S t.-26 8 2 SDD-DECO-based conservatively estimated 6 by multiplying the origia l'ISIT41000028 D9-554 Figures 003 on D-37 Figures yield nel atresses by the i 3 D-38 D-37 largest acceleration in-2 I C-19 D-38 crease comparing all three C-19 directions. These new j / stressos are below the p I new allowable values f therefore, the equipment { ( { / Mg' M J M to requallflod to the e-del >/ i new site-speciflo earth-i 04< Q /*,<#s l,k q; QjP L8 l f: K l 1 I I

S TADLu 3.3-34 IIVAC RCIC PUMP ROOH COOLER SEISMIC RE-EVAIUATION StfMMARY TABf._E I Method of Original Sy s t esa, Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results f Nscr ipt ion conclusion and Remarks t l Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra f Comparison Margin Report I of Fig. 8 Saf6ty l RCic Punge Room Cooler X Edison S&L Report S&L Report 23.4% N/A The new stresses were PISIT4100B021 File No. SL-2602 SDD-DECO-uawu - conservatively estimaLJd B9-554 Exhibit 2 003 on by multiplying the origi-and Figures yield nel stresses by the Pig. C-11 0-29 1argest acceleration in-D-30 crease comparing all three C-11 directions. These new stresses are below the new allowable valuees (here-fore, the equipment is j / P requalified to the new j e f2 y /etepu cWsfC '- d 1 4 i u, E haYdfNYC~4 /b&dy yjgg/k.gpoy f' OCQb 'O M ?} ~ ts t I l l 4 I ~ l t l l l i i l I i. i I 1 l 1 4 l l 1 l

I Illlll!lI 6 f

! Q: !l f.

le l \\ l . i .9 .f h \\ e s kr ano m m d n a n o i u s u ~ lcn oC 4 n y c A i t gf e trof a a n s F S t l 4 u sI s i e st R yr l o n ap o ne i AR t r a a u n l i a g e v %r y 1 E a e M N o A R n F n p ao G o rsO N t ti I, f cr. y I 5 O 1A E. eag ppi t n 1 1 t t h b c I B SmF - c 3 A A o 5 A : T C Y v 1 n. i - Y ~l T E l 0 H A . i P. M a s t A . c P r 2 I t i T D w A H S c C s e i l p C c a S A S n lV in go i l ii rt t n oa r c o fi p o of e i R dloa hu s %xM tQ i e s M y lan A tse 9 T tnenop w C n ~ ,o ol "r. rtue tl cr ue rs = t o sD m e t m sy s n8JP l

llll, l

l

o e TA' 5.3-35A _p. IIVAC EQUIPMENT ANfIlORS SEISHIC IE-EVAf.IIATION i. StPPdHARif TABl.R Hethod of Original system, structure, cumponent QualifJeation Re-Evaluation Results Description } ;' conclusion and Reseerks t Spectra l Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report i Spectra f Comparison Marcin Report I of Fig. 8 Safety Anchor Dolts for the followin<j Edison S&L Report S&L Report f wquigunent : File No. SL-2682 SDD-DECO-Figures GCs 1: Figures EIEW Pump Itoon Couler X DC-575 B-31 B-31 2574 N/A The anchor bolt stresses l B-32 B-32 M were recalculated by C-16 C-16 on applying the new site-1 yield specific selssio loads. i; The resulting sheek & 5 tension stresses are y; below the new allowable y stressess therefore, the anchors will safely sus-a tain the effect of the to new site-specific earth-quake. Control Air Compressor Cooler X DC-577 B-29 D-29 N/A Same as above B-30 B-30 se C-18 C-18 on yield Esgulpinent Room Fan-coil Unit X DC-582 B-37 B-37 J,th N/A Same as above B-38 B-38 based C-19 C-19 on orig-inal allow-able chilled Water Pu h and Motor X DC-585 D-13 B-37 4 N/A Same as above B-14 D-38 " banco C-9 C-19 on orig-Inal allow-fl [& 85C [f f A,

Tant ~3.3-35A (cont.) O ilVAC EQUIPMENT ANCil0RS i SEISMIC Nt:-EVAf.lfATIOt8 SUMMAftY TA Df.R P Method of Original System, Structure, Component Qualification ha-Evaluation Results Description Conclusion and Remarks ,i l t i Spectra t Analysis Margin L Test Analysis Report I Spoetra 3 Comparison H.nrgin Report 8 of Fig. I Safety

.j i

n:mergency Maku-up Pltter Unit X DC-593 D-13 D-37 95.35 N/A Same as above B9-762 D-14 n-38 TdIUT

C-9 C-19 on yield Multi-sone C11 mate Changer X

DC-589 B-37 B-37 73 W/A Same as above D-38 D-38 44 .I C-19 C-19 on yield .l 4 8,a E::ltchgear Room Coolers X DC-572 - B-33 D-33 N/A N/A The new site-specific D-34 B-34 =""""" carthquake accelera-C-19 C-19 tions are less sovere than the acceleration loadings that wore used in the original solamic anchor bolt calculations therefore, the anchors are requallflod. leCIC Puesp Moima Coolor X DC-579 B-29 D-29 N/A N/A Same as above W B-30 D-30 C-18 C-IS f ? $ f ) y $sfN /b$(0&r. ,, e# c w s,b r4aO $44 wz<-e 9eC4cW, al/ yL;g,/)c$

p e

9 w-ss des./'d a /}" 9.ft s aMm r / ,A n rc efy / "c h' 4 w&&,&sw6ml1f./ -c L <ca 7 eync., .w ~ sens. / e+m-, a sh &e /4se mkoa d 4 yw y m g.: ,. J.n - a. a

o k s-s - tdl r c en np a i ro l oi. s l na m faei aiud g-es oau e irvtent qe nrre b q R ceeariaei ie r ee ~ el sregc f tdhtl rtr A d pe ewiisi nit sioa n scsl rfil usi oh ud a - csetoiha o n t.dccqe l ner eaoca l tu mo n t l chea q c n e gad e e de i e athu,e r iin ad o gyid i sk o tqer e~ i aros r l r l nos s wuahgncos o' aooasn. u eq tniifi o mt o l o lc nhs i me c ceacd sy t nnddsrt

ed m

e n eroaaeien e*l reaeel oC haihosehe hct ahrrrf Tettl ustm Tf sgTf aai )s 9n n y i t e gf e A

rof

/ a a N Cn@4 T s s M S t l e u s8 s i e st R yr Mw ca l o n ap z d ak o ne AR i bl u n fs- (('. a fc d l i a g A 9 / 3 N v 1r H o E a M e e Nn 6 e. e R n ao M to rs6 o 7 I' I ti c s 5 T i S r cr. tE e 8 Y r eaq rD r 1 f. 1 S ppi o-u972 1 5 u. t SmF 1 pD 3 g5 5 6 92 f i 3 G t. A o 5 eD0i 56 s f v. T C 8RS0FDBD 88 N 3 I. I hem ~y fO : Y O t N 4 4 t C l Att 2s 4 i a 4 Ito e r n CI i t t8 e 8 A l. t r6r T l H S c k r& a E o2 u342 W S e 32 t Lp.i-g446 V I l p & et 46 i E a S SHSrDDa DD d D S n i n e Ae go I ii o67 rt t nN00 7 3 Oa r o r6 11 c o se11 6 fi p it - - l& b of e di99 9 }[ i R erd 8 8 dtoa a hn s t () i e s h num u M y l X X a [ n A e m tseT i pg r. mm tn e e (f a, n s o r p o m e l o c f g;q,e, a c s h n n A ,o a ei F2 rt s gL up r n )oa ti e2 i1 cr uc l0 l rs o0 o& t e oC o ~- SD C0 C1 0 0 l0 9 n l7 l s l 4 m eT e0 e wI w0 t yS y7 s rI r4 y DT D l' S nIj E lll ll

m .~. = tao..c 5.3-36 Hitit COMI't.EX llVAC SrtSHIC RF-EVAL.UATION StMtARY TABl.E Method of Original Systte, Structure. Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results

{

Description conclusion and Remarks i t i Spectra 9 Analysis Pargin Test Analysis Report I Spectra 8 Comparison Margin Report 4 of Fig. I Safety 1 j RIllt Cumplex pump Room Ventil-x S&L S&L 20%[ ' Reevaluation was based at ton, Switelegear exhaust EMD-t:MD- "f or un a dynamic analysis ventilation A, B, Diesel Cen-029830 029950 angle of linear elastic struc-erator Ventilation attaches tural mo.let utilizing Div. 1& II EMD-to base the sectliod of response 1.ocation Riilt 029830 plate spectrum analysis. A I Stevations 590' - 617' continuous, uninterupted i operation and structural j !setegrity of the subject systems during and fol-lowing an eartheguake was demonstrated in the i tn above mentionud analysis. 1 Stresses are within AISC j allowables. i Contrul Dan.purs, typo CD31-PB X Huskin SSL 1.27t* Stressos are within the and ou Isolation Dampers, Mfg. Co. EMD-N allowable 11mit9. typo CD R2 92 C0:41-92 029950 Control dampers qualify location RilR 1/29/79 to new response spectra. S&f EMD-037492 3/20/19 FMD-017187 2/14/79 2/27/79 g h [gg Q D W ~ For top blade based on aIlow lelus I l l l l l I l 3

'/t_., f... j.Hi Q $ /rf,/ */ & y Vest k l9 k:b +1 u t j t O NM '1 O S W/ W/ W.Tf( f .... 77..,7 A3~/fff Q HouMWG. SfMSS //m)k. \\ j l l j. We $ecr rkeb le 8 pre assoc la&wik /..... .../... /0 WM0 $/ W$b $$r& (lolC, Ek NQ g $AN NM1 / G / $~ O '1 2/ fN i / -l.. _., /Q.}/ $ffNYf/ /1 /S. C*i _... / p _ - -. /~Of**f 0 O l i i -- y 7.. ... ~ $/ YCex.s. feu'ef = / 2.$.C.h) I dlIa h-Q .r.- i. n fa*>,i. t m.. A O N h .l e I f j, 8M4y 7/k'4 / /n " . 3 4 _7[A r) =. 7 A -44 Ma44p.depy ' 3 t % + y -ay;~ _ l. .4....--6.-- l l l l s ~ 6- ....e -.....--.-..----.--a...*--. - ~ - f I i f e i 8 i I -.==~~- ~ . ~ - _. - p I e e t .e e ....,....e, .....e e s

i ye ' Goi es Owwer.s I 1 .i. _: Pes)n. ace em <%. cwyev,:re n [ i p \\... /c M .7,'ve M /:L kd. h4kT /7-/C9 3 l-l j t 8 i 1 j

s-s 9,Sy5 2,c j

i 9 t: e-w 9, x .ra i i Enz_. .3 f _2, S~ l . l [ l i i p. /b Q CCL*/ t Q. . h/3 / / 4 W-? / /C9s 7 l 4 l s I i l k I g ..i,_.. i.. . g. i t 1 i 4, I, I i l i i j I i c. ..d_ 1 l s e t e e. e. e

~

} 'rAltl.P. *>.1-1f. les en t. I 1 j ltilR COMP l.EX llVAC ] _ SEISMIC RE-EVAI.IIATIOP8 Sitt* MARY TABl.E l Method of Original l System. Structure, component Qualifications Re-Evaluation Results Dukesiption Conclusion and Remarks t Spectra l Analysis Fargin Test Analysis Itepor t i Spectra 8 Comparison Margin Report I of j Fig. I Safet fpp. L. I attet Complex rans X Duffalo S&L 15.0% Stresses are below l Equip. Hu. X-41-03-C01, 02, Forge Co. EMD-N yielding on foundation 01, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08 7 7 K-25508-029950 bolts and within allow-i locatioes RilR 2339/78 ablos on the other j Eluvation 617' S&L sections. Tliis equipment EMD- !s requallfled. 0i6238 gy RilR Complex Fans X Buffalo S&L -13.7De Based on a more sophis-Equip. No. X-41-03-C021, 22, Forge Co. EMD-L!cated analysis the i 23, 24 77K-25526 029950 fans should qualify. Location Rilit 31s 9/78 Reanalysis is underway. i Elevation 617' S & f. See Section 5.4 W EMD-h 016338 E m q W5 IM $6L >100pm. Based on a very con. kilR Complex Fans X Duffalo e Equip. No. X-41-03-Ol7, 018, Forge Co. L EMD-servative evaluation, 019, 020 77K @TT')" hI 480 4Bg950 the stresses in the location MilR 524-27 e same components are

J1h, higher than allowables.

Elevation 590' 9/78 g hg gM i S&L g slowever, when analysed EMD-in detail, the fans may 016338 quality with little or no modification. Re-i analysis is underway. eygg/5.cMay See Section je/,,a<3e gry,,,d.tio.,-tob..ed ggggy f4, ym, riuid 4 fg4-CQ0-4/e#s oco3 93 /@ FN ..,o, int. st...d ..oe on .** For sisaf t over y!ald (. I O,,t. ho+- SJoekt/*btO'7-1 f

6 N O TAul.E 5. 16 (con t. ) ItttR COMl'I.EK llVAC Sr.15MIC NB:-EVAf tfAttoes StitaMARY TABf.E i ~-- 7 Nthod of Original Sy s t ate. St ruct ure CufhpOnent QudlifjCALlQQ $0*EV8)MOL100 Desults twi.esletson Conclusion and penarks i t 1 spectra t Analysis Margin j Test Analysis poport 8 Spectra I Coorpa ri son Margin Report 8 of Fig. I Saluty t, yA I lettu cumples F.snes X Buffato S&L 16.7% e Stresses are below yield-Laulp. No. X-41-03, C009, 010 Forge Co. EMO-N ing limits ell, 012, 01), 014, 085, 016 77M-25516-029950 i location RilR 23 Elevattun 617' S&L EMD-016338 2 t tn I 4 4 j D i ~

ror inlet stan*! based on yiuld

l Y

e e

i ? g. j o n n n n n t n u s o o o o - o s e o k es e es e es es es ee d es r ri r ri r ri ri ri rtrr ri A a r r r r r oe r m ca cn ca cn ca ca ca cnfv ca le i pt i c. i pt io ipt i pt i pt i o i pt E mms m mms m mms mms mms m sa mn s i pa soe sd soe sd soe soe soe sdl n soe d i ct ie ict l e t ct i ct i ct i eeu i ct n e es e es e e e esng e a s y2 sat s y2 sat r y2 s y2 s y2 s a a a. sy2 i 4w b0 bs b0 bs b1 b1 b1 b pI b1 n s 6 s e s 6 s e s 6 s 6 s 6 s s 6 o tsp tst tsp t st tsp tsp tsp tsrd t sP i et - et et - et et - et - et - etan et - s en1 enl eni mnl enl enl enl enl a enl t i e r. u me1 mea mel sea mel mel mel mei - mel i mn mi mI mi mmr mt l mH mn mlI l ei l e le le l eie le t t c l e l ei le n erh erg erh erg erh erh erh ersm erh o.s o nit nii nit nii nit nit nit ni m nit C aui aur aui aur aui aui aui aufi aui P qw P qo Pqw Pqo Pqw P qw P qw Pqot P qw r-4*

k p n

y %e 3 t*

5.

i t

3 8 5 4 gf e 4m 5 7 0 7 8 8 6 1 trof 0 2 s 2-e 2 1 4 2 a a 2 s M S t <( l g eil.* '{ 4 u sI s i e st R yr l o e n ap o ne i AR hc S t t a D u n ,(' { ,e T l i S a c Y v tr S E a M T .e 1 4' nE c e A R P n I N ao C O rsC e ti N I I T cr. 7 H A E. eaq Ap ppi 3 l' t, SmV l t y n I 3 . A A o V T C f c 5 0 E 1 Y E. fT E i 1 ! il e!' l l N R A n O M a m A C C M r I U t T D M S c 4, N S a A I l p o O 2 o O l %/ E a S J N S n O i n go I I T ii m-M- 4 m-M- E8 A rt t e8 E8 2 e8 M7 M7 7 M7 M7 T oa r N c o A E fi p E7O R48 2 E41 E42 . /~ M of e P0! P93 6 P93 P93 tt i R S1! S91 2 S91 S91 i i dl T oa S hu s N tQ i 4n I o s M y J a, l X X a n A go. tse X X X X T k tn o en wn o p moC n S. .o l n. ei E rt N l i l I i i i i i W up A a ti P t cr 3 t uc M 6 2 rs u P 6 t o o e / / Sp l_ 1 2 3 2 3 7 t 2 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 4 6 m u 6 6 6* 6 6 4 6 s l P P s P P P P P 8 t T e i N l l I i l l l l l t l s l l l l O i l l ll t l t t l y C t l I s

bco lif;l.

f\\

..i7t 6la l'.l!!Iil. ,.4: i - ? = i l = l l a i i 1 a a k rt rt r u u n as as a q q-ra o pe pe p ee oe c cmt cmt cm rte rt e a so id i o io i o ik ik p me mc9 mc9 mcl ssa ssa ss o 0 s O s a i u i u a i a. l y8 i yS i yn wq wq s eb obP ebP ebi teh teh a s t c - s - s gt nnt nnt ss sl sl si s e r e r n st e stl stl stre mea mea i eo ee I tnt t not phe ph e ) o t nt tnl i ee ee it it e s eml emh emh emhS u c u c v u mea met met metO qoi qoi o l rn ri ri riR etf etf b c lii li w liw li wP i i a n eug eu eu eu - sdc sd c o nqi nqn nqn n qnl iee iee s C aer aeo aeo aeol hl p hl p a i o Pro Prs Prs Prsl Tfs Tf s ( n y i t 8* %e 8, gf e %= trof 2= 4 9 4 7 6 a a 1n 4 s F S a t l e u sI = s i 4 4 4 e st 9 9 9 R yr 7 7 7 lo F0 P0 P0 n ap R02 R02 R02 o ne DA2 DA2 DA2 i AR S t M E a T u n l i S a g YS v tr E a b M l A e d P R n e I u C N ao n N O rs8 ti i I I t R T cr. c IA E, eaq n F rpi I t. FmF c B TA A o ( IO V T C 7 D E 3 T - Y N E R I 3 O R A M a C C_ M r D I U t I N M S c E. A S e R l p I A N E a S T O S n I in T go i O. A ii M 3 F rt t Eg 3 Wl c o oa r M7 3 E7 M fi p E4s P8 U of e P9l R i R O1 S9I T dl S oa N hu s I tQ i e s M y lan A t se XXXXXX XXXXXXXX T t n enop mo s C l n ,o an ei a rt P up ti cr uc s rs k te c 45678 2 7 n12 St5G7 SD S 7 S ? u 0cnl22 3 a8SSu8u8 m S 9 a a 0OO00c 0 n0uUnOn0 O 0 u l l I t 1 - l' I l' l l I' l' l l' l' - s e P P P P l l t a. 1 1 w1 1 I l i i i 2 2 2 s l l l l l 1 I y l I I l I l i l l I S ,I 4- 't 1

e l la s uq k. ee ra rte m ik e ssa A. R i uwq d teh n nnt a e r mea n phe I o it i u c s qoi u etf i lc sdc n iee o hl p 8" C Tfs I n y e i t m gf e m trof e a a s M S t lu si O s i e st R yr* l o n ap o ne i AR S t M a E u n T l i S a o Y v tr S E a M L e ) A R d P n e I M ao u C o rsJ ti n N r i I f cr. t A A E eag n P L ppi t, o - B SmF I C A A o V T C ( fO E R Y m'. T E R i N R A O M a 8 r . C C t S I t D M S c E. N S e A I l p E a S A N S n T O i s 3 I gc I A T ii 1R A rt t 0 0-T Oa r 0A 0 m c o 6 00 fi p 19 399 N of e 22 0 I I i R HP Rs0 R dl T oa S hu s N tQ i I e s M y l X X anA tse T tnenop moC,no ei rt up ti S F cr ue rs ts A E i SD 6 6 D 9 9 a 2 2 e P P s t 1 1 s 2 2 y S R H @ iso o l i; i ' .i l o ii .9 O I

) ll li ! i' l O e s kra m e e ik R a m 1 1 u 7 7 d q4 3 3 n el 4 a " nt 5 5 3 3 r n n 5 5 l n a o e i o o i i e e s [i c t t l l u c c b b l f e e a a c i S S T T n c o e e e e e C p e e e e s S S S J R (_ n y t N f i t gf e sr of A a a s P S t / lu s8 s i e st o R yr l o f n ap o ne i AR t ? a u n n l i a c k v tr W E a I C M E e ke E R b n s ao t L o rs8 i O ti $ m l R T cr. T A E. eaq 0 N t t ppi 3 O I. D SmF I - C A A o Ya 3 D N T C 5 N I. Y A E R 0 . d R t. m N t a O C D r - A I T T t t I H S c A S e T I l p N E a S E M S n i n U + R go i 5 ii 4 T rt t 2 SN Oa r 7 c o A Ny I fi p 2 of e 6 i R 2 dl fd oa hu s tQ i e s H y l x m anA 4 i tseT 0 n t $e ne ) ) no b b a a p c c m m ) ) o n n 4 0 C ) o o 1 0 n b i i 5 5 e ,o a t t i A /r s ei c a a rt n n t t up y i i r r ti n. m m e o cr uc l r i s s f o e o n n rn r t t i i t o t l l l l e SD m 7 B i 1 S 5 G 9 0 O s 0 s 6 e e r t' P r P l t s I l l i l y i l l l I l S I i l i I t t I t (\\ llljl l t

f [ ,I;tt f pol,lN l lj l ll q 1 1 s s k u r q a ee m rte e ik R ssa Y ^ 1 1 i u 7 7 d wq 3 3 n teh 4 4 a nnt 5 5 3 3 e r n mea n s 3 4 o ph e o o i i e e T itu ci s y t t l l u qoi c c b b l etf e e a a c i S S T T n sdc o iee e e e e c hl p 4 e e e o Tf s S S S JI 4,f g n y t 8 f i t gf e trof 8 M a a g e F s t b/r l 2 u sI 2 s i e st 4 R yr 9 s, e lo hn n ap 7 P0 o ne R0 i AR DA t ta t u n o i l i a c sf v tr W E a C M ? E e E F d i n d e 'P ao L O rsI O ti Mx I R T cr. T A 0 N I ?. eag ppi 3 O I. I SmF H I C A n o 3 V ? C D k@b t 5 N Y A E R 9 d. R A a N ^ M a O C P r .A I p I U t T TA M S c S e T 1 l p N E a S E S n M hn i n U go i 5 R il 4 T rt t 2 S oa r 7 N c o A l' y I fA p 2 t of e 6 R 2 dl td oa hu s fn tQ i e s M y l X a Nu nA F tseT ne t M n e ) ) no b b a a p m c c m ) ) o n n 4 0 C o o 1 0 ) n e b i i 5 5 ,o ^ /r a t t D A n ei e e c a a rt e n n t t .= up i i r r y e ti s. m m e e w cr l r i s s = uc g* e e o n n rs r t t i i e t e n SD ( ( ( ( l 7 8 1 1 S e 5 6 9 0 O m s 8 5 6 E hr t P P P r P t h l I t 1 l o y 'I l t 1 l s e S I I 1 1 it I l 8 1 r L ,lli(j ~

e rAllt.R 5.3-39 INSTittlHl:NTATipH AHit COHTitut.--CONTitOI. AIR SI:ISMIC PI'-tyi.IIATION filltaHANY_ TARI.M Method of Original System. Structute, Coal.or.ent Qualification Re-Evaluation Pesults Description conclusion and 3.eracks t Spectra f. Analysis Margin Test Analysis lleport i Spectra I Comparison Margin Itaport I of Fiq. 8 Safety l50 - Nortle control Air See Section 5.4 Coolsussur Cositral Panel P50-P001 including PSE-P50-g See Section 5.4 Il021A and M/V-P50-6000A PSE-P50-N020A See Section 5.4 13 orth lichydration Unit - X B11-436 See Section 5.4 P50 021:003, 5, 7 y 1111-1914 lrolay rm cab.) X Nuctoar 44 imo 44 margin is based till-y985 Struc-upon the minimum yield tures strength. This compon-f co ent is requalified. ea See section 5.4 Inst-P898A trolay rm cab.) 9 lil 1-P601 41:514) gM See Table 5.3-37 till-Pu68 4terminatlun cab.) See section 5.4

-Zy'em on ensb' " rc~w/l%

2cakA1/5i8 Lve,4(a-menaranda eM te,;; a : ma a m oxf~~. dd yy rde de.nyc,feye/s b/8-s~y=v-fu <w -s ~em e 3&Ab9 Aa-74, =- 3 '= z-s Y m emfWN /sd f+y&dhakhn, 7eeefer-y4(n a Mk I i if l i i l u

=- m m TAl:I.6 5.3-40 INSTRLsHI;NTATION AND CONTitOI.--I'3Sf'HTI AI. IIVAC SEISMIC RC-EVAI.lfATION e

SUMMARY

TABl.E Hethod of Original systee, structure, component Qualification Ite-Evaluatson sicaults Conclusion and sessarks i Description 4 Spectra t Analysis Fargin Test Analysis Report i Spectra l Comparison Harq1n Report 8 of Fig. 8 Gafety H25-P296A ply i IIVAC control York 3, Solsmic Test Report 77113-2 p " Edison File No. 39-lE3f" lasnel with.sil internal con-autmaltted to W. Street trolse solenoids, relays g

9 qualls ** *I

~ 5th flous .s um. I,ia l l d i ng rease M This equipment le requS11= Il21-P296E IIVAC control panel York "M fled to the new site with intern.nl comitrolse 77113-2 specific earthquake solonoids, rolays

I 5tle floor aux, taullding (as alhve) ll28-P285A chillor csumpressor T41-00 D-008-RA-conteol leanal 004 Trane cn 89-1018.

ta8 Selsele Test Report " York ll21-P572 York Solemic Rack York Final Report 77113-2* 77113-2 sutsaltted to W. Street qualif **'" ~ 9

9 teams See section 5.4 TSP-741-Nu61A, -N062A, N063A.

N065A, NH66A, N067A (locall i f See sectIon 5.4 TSE-T41-N1744, N374C, N374E, 18174:1, N175A, N175C, N3751:, s HI?5G, N127A,t;222A TM-T41-Hil1A, 18114 A ~ dj$br$nb,, e N f See Lio .4 ress-T41-14tt'e'J A, Ill2 5A, N 124 A No se4 % + par}$,[deh4.V. %ar/b 4+v/h.%kdn = /.c2 ? M u.& Ag 4sy 5,*Ajbr.af/ a YA1 it#ffem o*, es >47e 6uti A4s4,dme A<h ds >Ho o

r. e Taut.E 5.3-e0 (Continu d) INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL--ESSENTIAL IIVAC SEISMIC pr-EVAM ATION StirMARY TABI.E a Method of Original System. Structure. Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results Dracription Conclusion and pesarks Spectra 1 Analysis Pargin Test Analysis peport I Spectra I comparison Marcin acport I of Piq. 8 Safety PDS-T41-N060A, N325A [Y See Section 5.4 PSE-741-N 326 A See Section 5.4 Seismic Design calculations I T41-00-C-434 Fluor poport RICO-9901-2 fsr ifVAC duct std. Instru-900-Lis-IDEco file No. 1911). moests: pressuae sw & temp. 010 09-Margin based upon yield sexsing elements 1811 stress. This component is requalified. Ut T41 components Damper Motor Fluor 894 (Same as Above) I I Mountings for T-4100 Pioneer I Fl5'#A & a thru FIG 3 A & S Rico 9901-4 89-2174 This equipment la requali-Powers Motor wills positioning K T41-00 fled to the new alte relay 332-2793 NMICO Llenit 000-QX-specific earthquake switcle R:A-700 016 Ill i-PO S B (turnin.ation cab.) p See Section S.4 1111-859 (termination cab.) g See Section 5.4 lin 1 -PG 081s511 See Table S.3-37 ~ 4

, s [ ; r* i l s a k u r q a ee m rte e ik ~. R ssa i u 7 d wq 3 n teh a nnt 3 4 4 e r n mea 5 S 5 o ph e i i l t e s m c s s u c l i i u qoi b t t l etf a c c e e c i T S s n sdc e o iee e e s c, hl p e e e Tf s S S s n y kgk t gf e 4rof gM a a s M S t l u s8 s i e st R yr l o n n ap o ne i AR t A a G u n M l i I. a g t v tr O E a O M +A C e n n d f. N ao f / E O rs8 ti W I Y T cr. R A E. eaq ppi 1 D U. n f 4 D SmF T . A A o f V T C u 3 O 3 t E i - Y M T E R 8 E. I t D A O M a ID C C s t r A I t T D M S c N S e A l p I E a S N S n y O i n 7 I go I T ii 23 A rt t T Oa 13 bn 9 N c t11 E fi r t0 - M of e A09 l i p g18 iH dl T oa /y S hu s N tQ i I e s M y lanA /n ts /e e O T t ~ n ) en b Wo o a p c m l o e n m s C n 2 o o n a 0 l o ,o P 5 t r ~ e ei A a rt l n y up a t l a t. ti c r a l cr n e r e s o r hr uc I rs n L t i ( t e SD A A s B 0 9) B 2 0 Bt 9 e n m 3 B Bo B e P P t-u P t al c a l s 1 i lt S l l l a l y 2 l l c i i I I t

i i '

= m TA. ; 9.3-42 INSTitUMt NTATION AND CONTiot.--RilR CONPt.EX SEISHIC kt -I. vat.IIATION SUPMARY TADt.E I 1 Method of Original Systee, Staucture, Component Qualltfemtion Re-tvaluation Results Di.scaiptlon Conclusion and Remarks ? t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysts Report 8 Spectra 8 Comiparison Margin Report 8 of Fig. I Safety t i CitP f etSEnTS r Illl-t 60l ASGI NilR SW k See table 5.3-37 till-P60lD514 EESW See Table 5.3-37 Ill-P807u510 RilH SW See Table 5.3-37 till-P809A501 Diesel Fuel & till-P6MA%1 Lut,e See Table 5.3-37 S:,e Table 5.3-37 till-P602siD EDGSW f See Table 5.3-37 Y TERNitJATION CAllTNETS lill-P823 kiist SW lill-P868 Hillt SW EESW til l-P86 9 Diesel Fuel & I.ube See section 5.4 II21 -P 350 ll.ocal llVAC Control Panel) - 131cuel Cencrator Ventilation hg See Section 5.4 h Il21-P351 (I.ocal livAC Control l'anell - Diesal Gesierator Ventilation See Section 5.4 skid Terailnal and Relay Dox X ITE SSL >100t* Que11 flee to the new Equip. No. R'0015001-4 Jegierial J EMD-response spectre. TRS 6 1.ocation niin dated 029950 envelopes the new RRS. Elevatlos 590' 12-19-72 S 6 T. 6:ND-0093973 / / l W L.::t.'.'. 5 '"~c' ~ "' Q ; g 6., f $ gsp $)fa,4,gg K9T 2*9 7M & b " " W " gf N 1

~ Taut.E 5. 2 (Cont! Quod) 1HSTHUMBINTATION AHit CONTitOf.--RilR COMPI.EX SEISHIC_Rt-ITAI.tATIOM I SutytAny Tant.E \\ MethoJ of original i Sy si t:n. Structure, Component Qualification Ro-I: valuation Pesults Deseslptson Concluston and Demarks t i Spectra t Analysis Pargin i Test Analysis Report i Spectra I Comparison Margin Report I of Fjq. 8 Safety ..,= Engline l'anel Instrumentation X Wyle I. abs S&L >100t* Instruments quellfy to tu:ation HilR dated EMD-new response spectra. j Elevation 590' 5/1/78 029950 TRS envelopes ttie new N' S&L EMD-013860 EMD-001659 g/Ag N See section 5.4 plesel conerator' Control X Colt Ind. S&L Console R30-Do-EMD-E.guip too. R100S002, 004, 005, S-900-029950 p gg & 007 DA-022 s Ivestion RilN (205981) 00 El eva t iusi 617' 7/2/75 ll21-l'587 Auto Temp control kh See Section 5.4 I l'anul - IX; Vontilation k See Section S.4 l lx1 Ima.1 Sepsweicor X 7 En< pine overstwed Covernor X Colt Ind. S&L } l 00L Oualities to the new E.gup. No. R10015001-4 Resor t EMD-to trig response spectra. location HilR dated 029950 Elevation 590' 1/24/73 551. EMD-001659

For vertical 6 toutluontal d i rec t iuss 1

i TAtllE f 42 (Continued) IN:iTHUMt:wrATION ANI, COMri4OL--kilft COMPIEX 4 SE t r.H IP k t:-rv Ar.t At t twa SitPHARY FAllt.E Method of Original Systeem, Structure, Coog.onceit Qualification pe-Evaluation Results IAmesIption conclusion and penarks j I t spectra t Analysis Fargin Test Analysis poport 8 Spectra 8 Cosnparison Marcin scport I of Fig. I safety vof-sel-NOS6A teoc Itti pg see sectice S.4 TLw-X4l-N0561s (Etx3 012) gwite;iiquar aman tiVAC hM See Section 5.4 vtM-x41-Nos7A TLM-X4 8 -N057C Etxi pouan llVAC See Sectica 5.4 Yt:tf-2 41-N05S A Piemp RouenllVAC See Sectica $.4 LM Operators (ITr) ,o, .. s t i., I,... r. t e l, k g

TADI.E 5.3-45 480 v Ac 6 260 V nc enTon cotrrpol. crl'Tt:M IITE) SEISMIC DE-EVAL.tlATlop

SUMMARY

TABt,E Method of Original syntes, Structure, Cosycnent Qualification Re-Evaluatic.n Results Description Concluelon and penarks t Spectra Analysis-Margio Test Analysis Report i Spectra 1 Comparison Marcin Report I of Plg. I Safety Sist, pit ment Selbaile wit le X R1600S-See Sacticri 5.4 St.indatellity Tebt Iteport 900-II A-MLT-lievitos Oct. O. 1973 003 (C4-H-STS-20 Supplesment 468) Solismic Wittistand.elillity Test X R1600S-See Section 5.4 Nport Oct. IS, 1977 R-STS-36 900-lea-Wyle I.als Naci t 843472-1 003 IE5-4681 Soismic $1mulattiin Tout X R1600S-See Section 5.4 popeer t Ld Ou.ellfy the struc-

00-g Leiru Wolds, lisly 31, 1979 HA-010 M

Q-STS-2n nov, I 105-594) wy e I 33 W[ air t. 8 4 3 0ill-2 R1600S-o g .a* 9 00-It A-012 IES-607) This component is r waali-tivismic Monsiting for HCC X R16003-N/A hg fled to the new sits Ipecific'earthquaissinces 900-RA-y er reass aualif 007 Solsmic Mouesting of Rolays is X New N/A tloo MCC 0 ? ON $ 0f [k'$ $jl y d h D I'4WA P 5" ' nAdsedAm/4 den A"e/s-were e f guan ma<&,& m hez merf *9""S es gg,, o/d&g cg abr ni de kA " " W8/ S e *2 fe ,44,y.m 1nc =s oL w n z< ~ ayh p e /a n. }/u,e = i jf%fk/*sts'4 th&W4/*p/! Kg b'r<G k k IS ~6'1

E

,~ m ~ TADI.E 5.3-46 480 V SWITCIICFAR (ITE) I M SMIC RE-EVAL.lfATION SUPHARY TABLE J I Method of Original System, Structure, Composie.'t Qualification Re-Evaluation Results i , Conclusion and Remarks Description i I t Spectra t Rnalysis Margin Test Analysis Report l Spectra l Comparison Margin Report 8 of j Fig. 8 Safety heO Ok: TRs envelopes the soIseie Cortifleatlon Report X RI400S-RRs. for Class 11: Swys-Electrical 900-RA-Egisilmmonit 010 (ES-tM j 6 ITC Report R-09122 439) I Ok TRS envelopes the gO Tust Raymart Solemic Sliock - I R1400S-N60)

RRs, 610 V seut.at Lielumed Switch-900-01.-

p board ased Comtannosits A.D. 001 g3 f l Itupor t No. 1t-8 792 See Section S.4 Salamic certificat!os Test X Rl400S-m Heport lor 750 EV A Voltago 038-RA-g O Ngulators 005 i y ley te I.al, Repos t 43169-1 B Report Voltage Regialetors 900-01.- LM, gj $;. }.g Oks TRS envelopes the m j Seismic Simislation Tust X Bl400S-RRS. Wylu lel, N pusi No. 42949-1 031 (ES-429) t Solemic Carstifleation voltage X R1400S-g Q Seism!c certification leuqui etair u Itis 9 0 0 - l.B- =g only. No attachments. f 096 P4 [ g g ' Ok t TRS envelopes the 4 84 +J,W Electrical Spalpment Class 1 X Rl400S-M f RRS. Seismic Sinock Cortification - 900-01.- 1500 KVA Tras:s(<sraior tfylo 027 (ES-R4; port No. H-09402 427) Addevedue to Tust RI400S-900-RA-th gmer t H-n940J 007 Ill 4 005-000-f.D-030 d / k pgaKa .m&9+.w,v- & o14.* mL~, /deyrfn%4,

g l l o a k u r g q a g ee s g fe rte s gk ik a a ssa 9 u i u d g wq wq n eh t eh a e nt nnt r e r n a mea o e phe i i t* s c u c " u ai qoi l q f etf c i i n c sdc t e i ee o k p hl p C, O s Tf s n y = 5 =h g i t = g NW gf e trof a a 3 s M S 1 t lu sI f, A s i e st m yr l o N' n ap o ne /g i AR ta P u n l i 1 a g v tr t a M f e 1 ) R d n u E N ao a e ) O rs8 9 n T I ti i I T cr. t ( A E eag i y-no R U. L ppi n SmF c A I ( L' A A o G V T C (. l E 4 C Y T E R l 3 M a + R A IW a 5 S C M r I U t A A b lE. V M S c / / S e N N u 0 I l p A 8 E a S b T 4 3 n in l go I ii rt t SA SA SA a Oa r 0I 0H 0R L b c o 0 - 0 - 0 - fA p 409 403 404 of e l00 101 l01 i R p90 R90 R90 dloa a hu e tQ t 8 e s M y l X X 4 2 anA y/ ts 7 e X T ee tn e J. g e p* n n /a p a n sa d n dy i i o nT t t = m y u u s o nr o k %m 34 C oD M p 6' 0 ,n t9 o c i o ei e. l i rt cH) e m up iVE s s ti f 7 l l cr iu1 e. e uc t p( S S rs t y t e ut g rs rs SO C m al al si uu oe ciu qf yf m isf hl hf v e mys ci cl tG tC t al s i l aa l sy ona wy wy y S SAT Sl sl a a iho~ n

,m m TAul.E 5.. .7 j 4]60 V SWITCl!CEAR (ITE D61*Et4IAL) SEISMIC Hl -INAI.IIATTON

SUMMARY

TABl.E Method of Original Sy s ti.m. Structure, Component Qualificatloa Re-Evalustion Results Duscription Conclusion and Remarks i t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis h port i spectra 0 Cosnparison >tarain Report 8 of rig. 8 Safety t. Selsele certific.ation for X Al4000-See Section 5.4 Cl.a s es IE Elvetalcal registp-000-SC-munt 10usuu 641s, 64c, 65E, 009-E4-65r, 647, 65T. 11 FA, 12 E8, 3)) iTE 833-471961 ?csL b port Seismic Shock X R14000-See Section 5.4 5kV Metal Cl.ed Switchboard 000-RA-and Coengenents. Wyle I 1 003 R-0912I k vi Seismic Withst.snJ. ability X R1400S-See Section 5.4 I I AuxillJry Rul.sy CE 000-ILA-P 12ilrA51A42r 011 Reims t R-09161-IIH This equipssent is roquali-Sei smi c I t h a t.and.shi l i t y X 8 kg fled to the new site over-ttnder Vult.s.je Relay I g" specific earthquake j CE 12tAV5JLIA Apurt it-09168tr Sulsmic Withst.sndability X See section 5.4 OvereurienL Ite 3.sy CE I AC5 3fl104 A (Pus ITE T0-76 29 l'reseesleere) tiepset H-09161-AT Selsemic Wi thst.snd.sbility X R14000-See section 5.4 overcessrent He1.sy UK 000-RA-12PJCllAVIA I t'e r ITE 006 Tis-74.29 Ps escedeiro)

13. g a s s t H-09168-IIRI h

%NSh. M [ & s os &ct VCp4c fffsuk& /*Mbtf SNr k4er Aer4//^wMens d ol4Ysktqk5ngs

m. e ~ TAltl.M 5.I s (l'init i mand ) 4160 V SWITClKW.AR (lTC IMl'ERI AL) Stl$MIC lil:.l: val.tl% Tint 8 i juPf1Al4Y TAijil Nthod of Original System, Structure. Componont Qualificattun Po-Evaluation Beaults Conclusion and stomarks Description t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report 8 Spectra 0 Comparison Margin Report I of Fig. I Safety ( D I ' '9" Selante Withut.ind.ibility X nl4000-II'd " = Inchuut Holay Elcetru Switch 000-RA- -1eg< specific earthquake Typu IDH Cat. 78030 (l'or ITE 007 TD-7629 proccibisc) Report Nu. H-09161-DC See Section 5.4 Sulsele Withstainlebility X R14000-Ove rcu r rcent Hol.sy Ctl 000-RA-121AC66 CIA Ilor ITE 008 T13-7629 l'rocestian o) Report No. H-01161-AV See Section 5.4 Solseld Willent.smlability JI'0 X R14000-H o JI) Relay ITE-STD-t-15/36/ 000-BA-1T 002 (E4-402) This equipment je requali-fled to the now site switchywar Mountisig Seismic X R1400S-specific earthquake 900-RA-Niert by Gif f ulo 013 O This equipment is requali- . 3,4 ; he h % htb fled to the new site X H1400S = p switcli.juar solsele Mounting .,ecifi ..rthqu.te by c.itfoi. g-RA-( e

'{' y l' it '. j

(?i

t s a k r I n t r e N ec a dd A l anI he se ama tp n p c r s i nl e co d teap te n aei s a mbrs dn e ea heo n hst ip o t i an fs ahmo tie is m i al r u snt a l Aioa ud c s c qe e 8 n ydi es .l er ri o asl v E C R.naa se 0abf ir p N n y i h' l- !i l i t 9 gf e 7 trof 0 a a 2 s P S t I 2 lu sI .i. l s i o e st R yr l o ,2 8 n ap 0 o nc 2 i AM M 1 t l Q a u n 9 l i

IIl 1

a g i M g-C v tr b 2 E a P M E e R f / n d 2 .I O N ao N O rs3 8 A 4 I ti P T cr. / A i N R D A E, eag 4 V t 8 ppi g I. I SnF 1 ) S l A o Og /, T V T C S E E N Y ~,. H 4 f 8 i l I E t A 1 li 4 M a A C C T fM r t A I l E M S c / S l S e N t I l p P E a S S n C i n ) I go i l ii N rt t SA I Oa r 0I I A c o 0 - M fi p 201 of e 301 Y t i R R90 f dl E oa TT hu s A tQ i l' l l e s l M y l X anA tse T t c i ne ms n i o e p S m o t C e n n ,o i ei b rt a up C ticr uc e s rs u t e SD F C ~ D( m r e no t ip s ao l t y pI S w ',., @ c l I It ,.i

p t TADt.E 5.3-49 DATTERIES & DATTERY BACMS & T11EIR HouttrING (C&D) SE!SMIC RE-EVAL.llATION StiMMARY TART.E t Method of Original System. Structure. Component Qualification Ro-Evaluation Results conclusion and Remarks Da scr i pt '.on t Spuctra t Analysis Fargin test Analysis Huport l Spectra I Comparison Margin Report I of Fiq. I Safety [e 9 **** g "" og, 24 V DC Battusy--Report of X R3200S. 9 .8' M st critical slab is soismic tout on 2 (3Deu-9) 900-RA-008 (Ell-(M[ slab 85 bldg. aux. lutterles for C&D, firt. Repost 14887 and report 84) 0.665 g 1.5 g. for sulcule test on two ( 3-Dett-3 ) batturlos and one ARR 13n AC 3 cliarger f or C6D. F?rt. I4uiert 15263 Ok, test response spec-110 V In! Battery--Solemic X R32005-900-RA-th. T @ h$ $1; ls) tra envelopes the re-simulation test program on qulred responso spectra tuo EC-13 battery culls & 004 (Ell-(aux. bldg. 6438-6) g H ono Altu 130 HK100 battury 80) M cliaryser Wylo liepos t O I42954-1 (bbo ok. l, g,,,,,* q,,ggg flattery racks for 24 V DC X R3200S-N/A q t>Jtterles--solsele analysis 900-RA-p (3M F1 r aus. b1M ,g { (/ J of C&D lettuny suppott racks 007 (Ell-for the C&D No. 3 DCU-7 85) Isot tu r y Battury racks for 130 V DC X lt 3 200 5-N/A tt +N g*** *q ok. N j> p ~7 B.at t ur ies--a,olumic analys t s 900-PA-h g yQ 003 (v.l l-a ccor t est kCU-17 single tier d battusy rack 818 CCI. Report iA-l19-77 This equipement is requali-Solamic Report of 24/48 V X R32-00S-N/A 464 El 17.31% fled to the new site f g),-M[ specific earthquake em===* 900-DA-tottusy e..ek mounting 1{ Oli Cat-001-tW2-159-156 R32-00S-N/A Pblme 178-gal-0364) 900-i.c-182 fg Nh l b $k kl YNf h l t

~. m t TADI.E 5.3-49 frontinnsd) ] 1 hAffEMIES & DATTERY HACES & TalEIR ltMINTING (C&D) SHISMIC RE.EVAI.lfAT10N i t f

SUMMARY

TAnf.f". l Muthod of original l Cystem, structuso, conoponent Qualification Re-tvaluation Beaults Description Conclusion and Reserks [ i t Spoetra t Analysis Fargin Test Analysis Report f Spoetra 8 comparison Margin Report 8 of Fig. O Safety s scismic design of 110/260 V X R12-00S-N/A 20,49 RSI 20.9% This equipement is requall l 6 24/40 V b.ettery sack sup-900-DA-dt ien s e poi t es, f usa tum & ita 011 g cuppor t s l 74-t;AI-Al 4 3 3 6 Solsmic domign of 130/260 V 3 Part of N/A This equipment is requall-lattery rock supports 24/40 % the DDP. fled to the new este tuttus y rack suppurts No ruport specific earthquake 4 number i Solemic report for Elio destas X No report N/A ( ! This equlpment is requall-

cf tino tuttery racks naambe r 9

fled to the new site b 4 q specirlo earthquake x Ib H 742a ~ jew) c t 9 4 f 6 1

= TAllt.E 5.3-5G IIA 1TERY CilAkGFRS AllD TilEIR MOUNTING (C&D BATTERIES) SEISMIC RI:-f:VAI.IIATION Stf>8MAI4Y TAlli.E Milliod of Original l system, SLtucture, Componont Qualification Re-Evaluation Rusults Duscription Conclusion and Romerks t Spectra t Analysis Margin Test Analysis Report i Spectra 1 Comparison Marisin Report I of Fig. f Safety ) 130 V de battery charger X R32-00S-report of suismic Lust on 900-RA-two ( 3 -lict!- 3 ) 1.stturius and 005 greass

9qualif "
ono APHI 3AC) s:luriper.ind C&D lEll-84)

{ j lut turius Ef f.1.ali 14agen t P l'i2 6 3 2 <a 130 y de battery climrger X R3200S-This equlpment is requali-seismic simulation test pro-900RA-fled to the new site gram on two M*-13 bat tury 006 specific earthquake cul t and urio Al'Ill JilkluO (Ell-80) f laattesy oliaragua p Ifylu !.ab Hi 3ma t 842954-1 i e-a This equipment is reque11-N Scisolu class I attachmont X R3200S-N/A 404 fled to the flew site for 130,V isattury cliariser 900RA-013 specific earthquake 24 V la.ittery a:harger and vol t ams ter -t:Al-0016) R32003 9008.C-075 (Ell-105) kd he JNMMI f M[ [ [ e

. =. m TADI.E *>. 3-51 e Inc FilSED DISTHlbtfflON CAulNET3 ISQtlAltE D) VDP NO. EF2-30,121C SE_ lf;MIC Itt> EVAL.trptiope J SilMMARY TAnLE r t i Method of Original Systcas. Structure, Component Qualification Re-Evaluation Results i Description Coaclusion and penarks j t Spectra t Analysis Fargin i Test Analysis Report 1 Spectra O Comparison Maroin Report 8 of i Fig. I Safety Seismic Oualification for a I n32005-See Section 5.4 250 V DC UMn 1*. enol floard 900-RA-Square D 8990-lo-09-l.16R 015 (t:c-e ll This equipment is roquall-t fled to the new site 82Ismic Class i DC Distribu-X T5100C 000-N/A 524 9 m specific earthquake tion Panet Installation at RA-001 the Reactor taullding (Ell-128) Solomic Class I DC Distribu-X R3200S-N/A 438 mar I This equipment la requalla tion Panel Installation at 063 e fled to the new site in-the Raitt Complux specific earthquake { IW 0-* f f $l h &Mf 4 ds frer71E-/N y& A o.< er my'% my new sa/gy. k M i Ar, O I

e + TAnl.E 5.1-52 e 120 V AC moi) tit.AR POWEll SUl'Pl.Y UNITS (MPUs) SP'ISMIC HM-hVAt.sec"InM e St1>8 MARY TAnf.E Method of Original Ro-Evaluation Results Sy stuas, St ructure, Componont Qisalification conclusion and pesarks IAsserl et ton i t Spectra t Analysis Fargin Tout Analysts Report i Spectra 8 Comp.srlson Marq1n Report 5 of ~ Fly. 8 Safety I* "

**9"* I" 14.024 fico to the new site solemic.scialysis Report of X

R310lS-N/A 003-00-00 spedfic earthquake i the yawur sul1ily p.anut struc-Lure 374021-8 l0 T

h Soluic vilit.itlose tests of X

R3101AS-0.436 g g grease

9ewalif fu 900-RA-I&C powes mus. ply p. enol com-
E8 'pHF 002 lE5-b guenesit a-- Ar.CO t r.ina f or 443) swelcle osel.st asin voltagu roqu-1.itor & t;E furible disconnect

, feegwirt This equipment is requall-74021-1 X Rl6003-N/A .hih-Wied to the new site h An.nlysis of solumic Class IE specific earthquake 900-RA-T M* owenentinqn for m.wiutar twswur 009 (Ell-

units al 6 2:Al-001-EF2-130) 191-118 (70-4;Al-2:8tl og g

e 9 "*III Solonic on.ill*lension of A R310lS. N/A $ 8l6*.. a. gg 9 001- - = = = = =.=y the s0M test switch muunt-(Ell-140) gg in9 for Mi>ue I & 2 s:A:- Onl-EF2-228-269 179-gat-352l ~ x,4mp f m A k,ess. e a owgA/e a/ a /sca kn. i~ %- 6 m &ams des-sm8/ pbym; we - p m&m e. e I i l* i j e

i l s a k u r q k a oe o e e rte n 9 ik 9 ssa i u f d wq i n teh l a n a e u n me q o ph g i it s u c a u qoi l etf e c t s sdcA n a i ee e oC hl P r Tf8 gg n y i t gf e a %rof d a a s F S t a l u s8 s i e st B yr ( l o C n ap 3( 5 o ne i AR l t I, a 9 u n 3 l i a g 2 v tr F E a E M o R O n H N ao O rs8 r ti P I D T cr. o V lA E. eag ppi (J I l. 3 ) D SmF f 5 . A A o P V T C R E 3 ~. 5 C

t R

l e O - Y [M l R A E. X 8 a M A c t A A r ln N A O i, U t / / M S c N N T C S e I l p ( E a S S S n )y N i n O go I ) ) I ii 5 4 T rt t 1 93 XA 8 A oa r 0 03 lD 2 H c o 0 - T fi p 30 5 3085 E of e 29AE 200E N i R TXD( T90( c E dl P oa f.. hu s tQ i o s f H y tW l Y a X X N 2 n D A e ts eT t n i 6 e e r n n t s ey o ce pl a p e1 t m l 1, rs et au o n es c f e 8 l s 7 ,n . os 8 ca 8 o ei

u. r s

3 rt sa S e up i P o P sn I st I ti yo is cr uc li ) si ) at yn.. rs na p l adp t e acdo SD ar r s m e t o ee.c a, soc s na nJ m l e eeJs sods t spna siea s et n s l

e. i rado eldu

- nc - Sadc t s y s caI StaI o! 9 l l } l

/( 6 g 5 IL l i l l s a a k d u r q q a e ee m r rte s ik a s " asa ~ i " l u d wq n t teh a n nnt e r n mea o phe i ! t it s u c u qoi l g etf c g i n sdc o iee c hip n Tfs

n y

r i t ts %uu ) I. m

4. s u

m N gf e u A lrof m M a a 3e 3u m F s P S 7n 4 e i m e F t Ol u sI l t s i u st O S m yr c N lo O n ap I o ne he T i An A t R a T u n E l i N a a E v tr P E a M y t. o ? f n E n W N ao Y O rs8 R ti I D T cr. a A E. eag O I I SunF ppi 4 T I. D 5 f A A o D 3 i V T c 5 i E t Y l e C E R I r. A R A T M a u T C M r N A U t T A A I M S c / / e N N i S Y F I l p X E a s O S_ n D i n ) ) 8n go I 9 6 f ii 0 X 3 A rt t 1 l 11 N Oa r O 0 - l c o Il I A0l t l fi p Sl S12 - l e / of e AE A20AE E i R CI C71 HI T dl &a, o :s DN h '* s tO i A o s S M y l X X E a X n O y A D T t A s N e l T t GI E T t i F n l N oc e a li t a n u C o q e p n4 tp m ca0 n, tsG e o i c mf! ms n af - hn luA co ,o t oB ai ai s F tt rt tN t a up tt t r cr nrii ar ooCN t mp l as uo me0O mn es o. t e I r5 i sD 26 g l n1 0 t g ld ao 6

a. l l

^. t rcpJ r yr u inia-m e uB t A l n i. e mw s ui y n us o TfTa Tdt ys ~. i}}

ML20039C663

Contents

Text

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

Reference:

Subject:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20039C663

Text

Dear Mr. Youngblood:

Reference:

Subject:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search