ML20039C026

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application to Amend Licenses NPF-4 & NPF-7,removing Specific Values of Fxy,Axial Power Distribution Surveillance & Axial Flux Difference Limits from Tech Specs.Class III Amend Fee Encl
ML20039C026
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 12/15/1981
From: Leasburg R
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To: Clark R, Harold Denton
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20039C027 List:
References
627A, NUDOCS 8112280331
Download: ML20039C026 (3)


Text

r y o

, 3 VInGINIA EtecTnIc Ann Powen CoMIwxy e

R tcint oxo, V HOINIA 20261 R.H.LEAnnena December 15, 1981 E

DEC2 81981> 3 Vaca Pavarpent ma 1'

Nectuam OPERATIONS WW

[q

/ r gr Mr. Harold R. Denton, Director Serial No.: 627A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FR/RWC: plc Attn:

Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Docket Nos.:

50-338 Operating Reactors Branch No. 3 50-339 Division of Licensing License Nos.: NPF-4 U.G. Nuc1 car Regulatory Commission NPF-7 Washington, D.C.

20555 Gentlemen:

AMENDMENT TO OPERATING LICENSES NPF-4 AND NPF-7 NORTH ANNA POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE Pursuant to 10CFR50.90, the Virginia Electric and Power Company requests an amendment, in the form of changes to the Technical Specifications, to Operating License Nos. NPF-4 and NPF-7 for the North Anna Power Station Unit Nos. 1 and 2.

As discussed with members of the Staff on November 6, 1981, the proposed changes would remove the specific values of the Fxy, the axial power distribution surveillance and the axial flux difference limits from the Technical Specifications. The specific values for these limits would be provided in a special Core Surveillance Report to the NRC 60 days prior to a reload cycle startup.

Implementation of this change will reduce the required reload licensing effort in the future by eliminating thoce reload submittals which are required only to address Technical Specifications changes related to the LOCA analysis power distribution limits.

In particular, implementation of this proposed change by January 31, 1982 will eliminate a Technical Specifications change associated with North Anna 2, Cycle 2.

To support this schedule, we are providing the Core Surveillance Reports required for the current North Anna cycles.

The supporting Safety Evaluation for this request as well as the specific changes to the Technical Specifications are provided in Attachments 1 and 2, respectively. Attachments 3 and 4 contain the Core Surveillance Reports required for the current North Anna cycles (Note that reports are provided for both the current (2.10) and recently proposed (2.14) LOCA total peaking factor limits). This request has been reviewed by the Station Nuclear x 8Lg e#

e1122emei eums e

pR -Cs==g

1 e e

Vinoisir Es.rcTate ano Powra COMPm TO Mr. Harold R. Denton Safety and Operating Committee and the Safety Evaluation and Control staff.

It has been determined that this request does not involve any unreviewed safety questions as defined in 10CFR50.59.

We have evaluated this request in accordance with the criteria in 10CFR170.22.

It has been determined that this request requires a Class III amendment fee. Accordingly, a voucher check in the amount of

$4,400.00 is enclosed in payment of the required fee.

Very trul y urs, I

i ML /

R. H. Leasburg Attachments (1) Safety Evaluation for North Anna Unit Nos. 1 and 2 (2) Proposed Technical Specifications Changes (3) Core Surveillance Reports for Current North Anna Cycles For FQ = 2.1 (4) Core Surveillance Reports for Current North Anna Cycles For FQ = 2.14 (5) Voucher Check for $4,400.00 cc:

Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region II

. =.....

i C0!910NWEALTH OF VIRGINIA )

)

CITY OF RICHMOND

)

The foregoing document was acknowledged before me, in and for the City and Conunonwealth aforesaid, today by R. H. Leasburg, who is Vice President-Nuclear Operations, of the Virginia Electric and Power Company. He is dely authorized to execute and file the foregoing document in behalf of that Company, and the statements in the document are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

[ec#,

Acknowledged before me this

/I day of 19 J/.

My Commission expires:

2-16

, 19 M.

0. W *W Notary Public (SEAL)

~,.

.. -